Heritage Park Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards (refer to elements of the resident environment that have the potential to cause injury or illness) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ingested a cleaning solution left by a housekeeper (HSK 1) in Resident 1's room on March 2, 2025. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to be transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for higher level of care and suffered from additional health issues. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD- serious condition where the kidneys are no longer able to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood treatment used to remove toxins), heart failure (when the heart is not pumping blood as well as it should) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect against physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) forcefully sat Resident 1 in the wheelchair by Resident 1's pants, then pushed the wheelchair into the room and closed the door behind Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury, emotional distress, and a decline in Resident 1's sense of safety and well being.Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility on May 12, 2026, at 1:28 PM, to investigate a facility reported incident regarding an allegation of physical abuse. A review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated an admission date of February 14, 2025. Resident 1 had diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by intense, irrational suspicions (paranoia), auditory hallucinations, and delusions (false beliefs that someone or something is going to cause them harm)). A review of a Mental Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy for Psychotropic (drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) Medication Use was implemented for one of two residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to place Resident 38 at risk of staff not identifying the effectiveness of the psychotropic medication and missing potential side effects placing Resident 38 at risk for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) it indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of intracapsular fracture of left femur (a break in the upper part of thigh bone), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (do not have enough oxygen in blood), and major depressive disorder (a persistent sadness, loss of interest). During a review of Resident 38's Physician Order, dated March 6, 2025, it indicated Resident 38 had a physician order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their medication administration policies and procedures when: 1. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) administered Metoprolol (medication used to lower blood pressure) Extended Release (ER- type of medications designed to be swallowed whole to allow the medication to work gradually over time) crushed to Resident 34. 2. The controlled drug inventory (when a nurse signs verifying that the nurses performed controlled medication counts during shift change- system in place used to prevent discrepancies in narcotic medication counts) had missing signatures on multiple shifts for two carts on Unit 2. These failures had the potential to place Resident 34 at risk for adverse medication side effects and place the facility at risk for potential diversion (illegal distribution of controlled medications for illicit use) of controlled medications by staff in a highly vulnerable population of 19 residents in Unit 2. Findings: 1. During a review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when a License Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not wear PPE (Personal Protective Equipment, such as gloves and gowns) as required under EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions, used to prevent the spread of resistant infections) while providing treatment to a resident in EBP isolation (Resident 117). This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites) to another 65 vulnerable residents and staff in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 117's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 117 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of aftercare following surgery on the digestive system (an operation that fixes or treats problems in organs like the stomach, intestines, or other parts that help break down food) and encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a small opening made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for investigating an allegation of suspected physical abuse for one of three sampled resident (Resident 3), when the facility did initiate an investigation for the incident within specified timeframes after Resident 3 reported an alleged abuse by another resident to the Administrator on April 2, 2025. This failure has the potential to jeopardize Resident ' s 3 health, safety, and well-being at risk and the other vulnerable population of 69 residents. Findings: A review of State of California Form 341 [Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse form], dated April 10, 2025, indicated . While Ombudsman [a person who helps solve complaints and problems between people and organizations, making sure things are fair] was visiting the facility [Resident 3] reported to the Ombudsman that [Resident 2] forced sex on her [Resident 3] last week on a Wednesday night (4/2/25 [April 2, 2025]) between 10:30pm-11:00pm while she was sleeping.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) information for 3 (Residents #2, #26, and #61) of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), dated 11/2017, revealed, 1. The facility shall complete a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by the Center of Medicaid and Medicare [NAME] (CMS), regardless of payer source, in facilities certified by the Medicare/Medicaid programs following the timeframes and instructions specified in the current CMS RAI Manual. The policy revealed, -Each responsible IDT [interdisciplinary team]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #51) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Specifically, Resident #59 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder; however, the resident's Level I PASRR screening indicated the resident did not have a mental disorder. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in 03/2019, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [also referred to as PASRR] process. a. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #51 on 03/11/2024 and readmitted the resident on 03/27/2024. According…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged sexual abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) by another resident to the local, state and agencies. This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised resident (Resident 2)'s health, safety and well-being at risk. Findings: During review of Residents 2's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a condition of mental illness), major depressive disorder (a condition of feeling of sadness) and hypertension (a condition with a high blood pressure). During an interview on April 8, 2024, at 2:30 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, We do investigations and report to the appropriate agencies including CDPH (California Department of Public Health). When asked who does the reporting, the DON stated, The Administrator usually does it, but all licensed staff and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure immediate measures were put into place to provide protections to one of three sampled resident (Resident 3) when a License Vocational Nurse (LVN) and a Program Counselor (PC) were not suspended immediately after an alleged abuse to Resident 3 was reported on February 14, 2024. This failure had the potential for further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment in a vulnerable population of 68 residents as the alleged perpetrators, LVN and PC, continued to have access to the alleged victim, Resident 3, and to other residents while the investigation was still in process. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition that affects your mood and perception of reality) bipolar type (with episodes of manic that can shift to major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) who eloped (leaving a safe area without authorization and/or appropriate supervision from the facility) was assessed to prevent or/and to minimize the risk for recurrence of elopement. This failure had the potential to cause a delay in identifying care and support needs which could place Resident 3 at risk for recurrence of elopement and at risk for injuries related to elopement. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s medical record , the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included of schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior), delusional disorder (a type of mental health condition in which a person can't tell what's real from what's imagined), and bipolar disorder (a mood disorder that can cause intense mood swings). A review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA