No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gramercy Court

2200 Gramercy Drive, Sacramento, CA 95825 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (916) 482-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2008 Morse Ave · (916) 973-7490 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1919 Fulton Ave · (916) 483-5141 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1970 Fulton Ave · (916) 993-8809 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2800 Cottage Way · (916) 414-6459 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2701 Cottage Way · (916) 488-1448

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.5%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.542.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.811.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.8%CMS range 58.8–72.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.6–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge79.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.8–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
43.1%
Total nursing turnover
47.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 1 hit Resident 2's face with his hand. This failure resulted in Resident 2 not being free from abuse and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 2's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted in December 2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects thinking, emotions and behavior). A review of Resident 2's Behavioral Health Note dated 6/6/26 at 8:35 p.m. indicated at approximately 7 p.m. Resident 1 became suddenly agitated during a scheduled smoke break and, without known triggers, struck Resident 2 with a closed hand. Resident 2 was immediately assessed and showed no redness, swelling, bruising, or other visible injuries and denied pain or discomfort. During a review of Resident 2's Change in Condition Note dated 6/7/26 at 1:33 a.m., Resident 2 later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of seven sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6) were free from abuse, when: 1. Resident 2 threw a cup of coffee onto Resident 3;2. Resident 1 pushed his walker into the back of Resident 4's legs;3. Resident 1 put his lit cigarette butt on Resident 5's face;4. Resident 1 hit Resident 2's face with his fist; and5. Resident 7 hit Resident 6 in the back of the head with his hand. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave and includes delusions or hallucinations). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents' (Resident 1) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident when Resident 2 punched Resident 1 in the face. This failure had the potential to cause physical and mental harm to Resident 1.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in February of 2026 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms and a mood disorder).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 2/26/26, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of four sampled resident's (Resident 4) from abuse when Resident 3 threw a chair at Resident 4 who attempted to deflect the chair and sustained an injury.This failure resulted in slight pain and a minor fracture to the ring finger.Findings:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2024 with diagnosis which included schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition combining symptoms of schizophrenia (hallucinations or delusions) with severe mood swings of mania and sometimes depression).During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/10/25, the MDS indicated Resident 4 was alert and oriented, able to make her needs known.During a review of Resident 3's care plan (CP) titled .At risk of becoming physically aggressive towards others.History of harm/assaultive behavior to others, Poor impulse control, fixated delusional thoughts, agitation., revised 12/18/25, the CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for four of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 7), when:1. Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 in the back of the head; 2. Resident 3 hit Resident 4 in the face;3. Resident 4 slapped Resident 5 in the face; and4. Resident 6 pushed Resident 7.This failure caused Resident 1 to feel upset, Resident 4 to feel afraid, Resident 5 to have a cut lip, and Resident 7 to have leg pain. Findings:1.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with diagnosis which included Schizophrenia (a chronic, severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), major depression, and anxiety disorder.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 1/26, the MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 10/15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with diagnosis which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from physical abuse for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4), when: 1. On 12/13/25, Resident 1 spat at Resident 2 in the hallway;2. On 12/24/25 in the dining room, Resident 1 slapped Resident 3 on the back of the head; and3. On 12/26/25 in the dining room, Resident 1 slapped Resident 4 on the face. This failure compromised the residents' ability to maintain their highest practicable physical, emotional and psychological well-being.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26 (print date), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and age-related cognitive (process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought process) decline. During a review of Resident 1's progress note (PN), dated 12/13/25, the PN indicated, At 1600 [4 p.m.] [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food storage and preparation, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, was provided to residents in a census of 101, when: 1. Floors, rolling racks, equipment, pots/pans, grill/stove panel, refrigerator doors, water pitcher preparation area, garbage cans, can opener, and towels were found unclean and unsanitary; 2. Food, and staff's personal food and drink, items were found in refrigerators and in the dry storage room, opened, not labeled, not securely covered, dented, and expired; and 3. Kitchen staff did not know how to explain or demonstrate the proper procedures for testing sanitizing solutions, and expired test strips were being used. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a vulnerable population. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 beginning at 8 a.m. in the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM confirmed the kitchen area and equipment were uncleaned and unsanitary. The CDM acknowledged and verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable room temperatures for three out of 28 sampled residents (Resident 61, Resident 62, and Resident 120) when:Resident 62's and Resident 120's shared room temperature was below 71 F (degrees Fahrenheit); and Resident 61's room temperature was below 71 F.These failures resulted to Resident 61, Resident 62, and Resident 120 verbalizing that their rooms were cold and very uncomfortable.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 62's admission Record (AR), dated 12/5/25, the AR indicated Resident 62 was readmitted to the facility in November of 2025 with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a brain disorder causing recurrent seizures due to abnormal electrical activity) and the need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 62's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/24/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 62 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction) were provided for residents in a census of 101, when:1. There was no efficient system in place to accurately document and secure disposed controlled medications when two stored bags containing controlled substances were easily retrievable; and 2. There was no accurate documentation on controlled medication for Resident 98, when the administration date was missing, and two bottles of controlled substances were documented on only one controlled drug record with a discrepancy on the remaining quantity of the medication.These failures had the potential for drug diversion (theft for personal use or illegal sale), and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions.1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 8:50 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 at the facility medication cart C1 (C1), LN 3 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1), when Resident 2 pushed Resident 1 which caused a fall to the floor. This failure resulted in an injury to Resident 1's left leg.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in mid-2025 with diagnosis which included anxiety disorder, dementia, history of falls, and a mental health condition where a person has hallucinations, delusions and mood swings.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 6/16/25, the MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 14/15 which indicated intact cognition.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnosis which included anxiety disorder, intellectual disabilities, and a mental health condition where a person has hallucinations, delusions and mood swings.During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was punched in the face by Resident 2. This failure caused injury to Resident 1's lip.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with diagnosis which included a mental health disorder marked by hallucinations and delusions, anxiety, impulse disorder, and mood disorder.During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report [OSR], order date 3/11/24, the OSR indicated, Resident is Incapable Of Understanding Rights, Responsibilities, And Informed Consent.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility mid 2025 with diagnosis which included a mental health disorder marked by hallucinations, delusions and extreme mood swings.During a review of Resident 2's OSR, order date 5/14/25, the OSR indicated, Resident is Incapable Of Understanding Rights, Responsibilities, And Informed Consent.During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse when Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 on the left cheek. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing feelings of unsafety, disrespect and physical pain.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission Records indicated Resident 1 was admitted in Summer of 2024 with diagnoses which included a mental health condition that affected how people think, feel and behave and Type 2 Diabetes. A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 6/2/25, the BIMS indicated Resident 1 had a score of 12 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had a moderate cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Note dated 7/14/25 indicated, At approximately 1540 [3:40 p.m.] on 7/13/25, MHW [Mental Health Worker] reported they had heard a slapping sound and saw this resident's [Resident 1] peer strike him on the left side of the face.Resident [Resident 1]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 pushed Resident 1 and hitting Resident 1's head into a wall which resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a skin tear. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not free from abuse by Resident 2. Findings: Review of Resident's 1 admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought and mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/14/25, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Review of facility dcoument titled Health Status Note, for Resident 1 dated 5/18/25, indicated, Resident [1] was assaulted by another resident [2] attempting to break up a fight . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped (left the facility unsupervised without prior authorization) through an unsecured exit gate. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain residents' safety and prevent accidents. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with a diagnosis of bipolar schizoaffective disorder (causes mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs and a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/26/25, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was 14 out of 15 with good memory and judgement. During an interview on 4/21/25 at 1:30 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly for a census of 107, when: 1. Staff stored personal belongings inside Hall C medication room; 2. Expired medications were found in two medication carts; 3. Two multi-dose liquid protein bottles without open dates and an expired inhaler were found in one medication cart; 4. Medication was left at Resident 404's bedside table; and 5. Treatment cart was left unlocked. These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely store medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/24 at 10:42 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6), Hall C medication room was observed. LN 6 confirmed a lunch box, a water bottle, three jackets and a bag were found inside the medication room and stated these were her belongings and she placed them in the medication room. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/24 at 11:28 a.m. with LN 6, Hall C medication cart-1 was observed. 31 expired and discontinued pills of carvedilol (a medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 27), when Resident 27 was wearing a gown while sitting in a wheelchair with her back and side of body exposed. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain residents' dignity and privacy. Findings: A review of Resident 27's admission Record, indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with a diagnosis of left hip fracture. A review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/22/24, indicated Resident 27 had a brief interview for mental status (an assessment tool for cognitive status) scored 12 out of 15 with moderate memory impairment. Resident 27 required substantial to maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with dressing clothes. A review of Resident 27's [Activities of Daily Living] Self-Care Performance Deficit care plan, dated 7/18/24, indicated staff had to promote dignity by ensuring privacy during care . During an observation on 12/3/24 at 9:27 a.m., Resident 27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) was obtained for the use of psychotherapeutic drug (a medication to control a resident's behavior) for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 43), when Resident 43 was prescribed three psychotherapeutic drugs without an informed consent. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to receive unnecessary medications. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record, indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in January 2020 with a diagnosis of anxiety. A review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/13/24, indicated Resident 43 had a brief interview for mental status (an assessment tool for cognitive status) scored 15 out of 15 with intact cognition. A review of Resident 43's Order Summary Report, dated 12/4/24, indicated orders for buspirone (an anti-anxiety medication) 20 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-medication administration assessment was completed for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 43), when Resident 43's medications were accessible and left stored on top of bedside table. This failure increased Resident 43's potential to unsafely self-administer medications. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record, indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in January 2020 with a diagnosis of anxiety. A review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/13/24, indicated Resident 43 had a brief interview for mental status (an assessment tool for cognitive status) scored 15 out of 15 with intact memory. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 9:32 a.m. with Resident 43 inside her room, Resident 43 had a plastic container filled with multiple anti-fungal, anti-itching, and antibiotic creams in packets and tubes placed at bedside table. Resident 43 stated the nurse and certified nursing assistant gave her the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) was completed in accordance with the regulatory timeframe required for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 76), when Resident 76's discharge assessment was not submitted within 14 calendar days of discharge. This failure decreased the facility's potential to complete residents' assessments in a timely manner. Findings: A review of Resident 76's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 7/15/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/24 at 10 a.m. with the Business Office Consultant (BOC), the facility's census of July 2024 was reviewed. BOC confirmed Resident 76 was admitted in the first week of July and was discharged 13 days after admission. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/24 at 10:20 a.m. with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 76's Progress Notes and MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 254), when Resident 254 did not have a care plan for hospice (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person's home or within a health care facility). This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet Resident 254's hospice care needs. Findings: A review of Resident 254's admission Record, indicated Resident 254 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with multiple diagnoses including frequent falls, malnutrition (less than minimum foods or nutrients essential for health), and palliative care (a medical care helps people with serious illnesses live with comfort and dignity). During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/24 at 9:47 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), Resident 254's care plans were reviewed. LN 1 confirmed no hospice care plan had been developed for Resident 254. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/24 at 10:25 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 254's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for three of 30 sampled residents (Resident 254, Resident 255, and Resident 257), when: 1. Resident 254's physician order to admit to hospice care (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person's home or within a health care facility) was not transcribed to the order summary record (OSR); 2. Resident 255's physician's order of heparin sodium (a medication used to prevent blood clots in blood channels in the body) was incorrectly recorded in OSR; and 3. Resident 257 was not given metformin hydrochloride (metformin HCl-a medicine to treat high blood sugars) as prescribed by the physician. These failures increased the residents' potential to have unmet health needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 254's admission Record, indicated Resident 254 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with multiple diagnoses including frequent falls, malnutrition (less than minimum foods or nutrients essential for health),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. A review of an admission record, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with agitation. A review of Resident 30's Order Summary Report, indicated an order dated 2/17/24 for lorazepam one mg to be given every four hours as needed (PRN), with no stop date. A review of Resident 30's Medication Administration Record, indicated the PRN order for lorazepam was administered from 2/17/24 to 7/23/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/24 at 11:02 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and ADON, Resident 30's Medication Regimen Review for February 2024 and progress notes were reviewed. Both DON and ADON confirmed that the doctor's order did not include a rationale/reason to continue Resident 30's order for lorazepam from February 2024 to July 2024. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 1 p.m. with the DON, DON confirmed Resident 30's lorazepam PRN order did not have a stop date and was given more than 14 days. DON stated a doctor's note with a rationale should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide weekly and alternate menus to three of 30 sampled residents (Resident 204, Resident 24, and Resident 38). This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet the residents' nutritional and cultural preferences. Findings: A review of Resident 204's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including disorder of electrolyte and fluid imbalance. A review of Resident 204's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), indicated her brief interview of mental status score was 13 out of 15 with intact cognition. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 204 was up in her wheelchair with breakfast tray not touched. Resident 204 stated breakfast was always the same, she was unable to know what it was until been served, and there was no menu provided by the kitchen or dietician so she could choose her own food preference. A review of an admission record indicated, Resident 24 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 46) was provided with necessary adaptive equipment (special eating equipment) for meals as ordered. This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet the resident's nutritional needs. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in July 2020 with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/4/24, indicated a brief interview of mental status score of three out of 15 with memory problems. During an observation on 12/2/24 at 12:25 p.m., inside Resident 46's room, a lunch tray was given to her. The food consisted of chopped meat, chopped vegetables, and mashed potato. All food was served in one plate. Resident 46 was observed transferring food to a cup before eating then stated it was easier for her to eat in a smaller dish. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for a census of 107, when: 1. Two expired food products were stored in the spice shelf; 2. One box of expired food was stored in the dry storage area; 3. A 12 pack box of expired lactose free drink was stored in the walk-in refrigerator; and 4. Undated food products were stored in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area. These failures increased the potential for food-borne illnesses among the residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 8:30 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) during the initial kitchen tour, two spice bottles were found on the spice shelf past their use by date. The powdered ginger had a use by date of 11/2023 and the ground nutmeg had a use by date of 11/4/23. DS confirmed both bottles were expired. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 8:30 a.m. with DS during the initial kitchen tour, a box of expired dried beans was stored in the dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility did not administer Resident 1's pain medication for several hours upon admission and pain was not assessed in a timely manner for effectiveness of the pain medications. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing uncontrolled pain and suffering for prolonged periods of time, which had the potential to negatively impact his daily activities, rest and sleep. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted the resident at the end of 2023. Resident 1's multiple diagnoses included cellulitis of left leg (infection affecting the skin and tissue, characterized by pain, swelling, redness, and tenderness), chronic pain syndrome, osteoarthritis of both hips (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and osteonecrosis (a chronic condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and report the results of an investigation of a Resident-to-Resident altercation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for two of three sampled Residents, (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure to complete the report investigation had the potential for residents to be subjected to further incidents of abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2021, with diagnosis that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), disorder of psychological development (physical or mental impairment) and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), Resident 1 scored 15 which indicated he had no impairment in cognition. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in March 2024, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer ' s Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff did not keep an accurate inventory of Resident 1's property. This failure resulted in the unrecovered loss of Resident 1's personal mobile phone while Resident 1 was residing in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated Resident was admitted in late 2024. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 1 had multiple diagnoses including multiple fracture of ribs. During an interview on 10/16/24 at 4:44 p.m. with Resident 1's wife, Resident 1's wife stated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with his mobile phone in his possession. Resident 1's wife further stated she was able to speak to Resident 1 on his mobile phone while he was residing in the facility. Resident 1's wife further stated Resident 1 was discharged from the facility without his mobile phone and was unable to find his mobile phone after discharge. Resident 1's wife confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure used to restart a person's heartbeat and breathing after one or both have stopped) policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when two certified nursing assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 2) provided CPR to Resident 1 without maintaining a current CPR certification. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide low quality CPR for residents during emergencies. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder), drug abuse, and diabetes (body's inability to properly regulate blood sugar levels). A review of Resident 1's admission Data Collection and Baseline Care Plan Tool, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1's Code Status: Attempt Resuscitation - Full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped (departed health facility unsupervised and undetected) during a group outdoor walking activity. This failure had the potential to increase Resident 1's risks for experiencing harm while away from the facility unsupervised. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility in late 2023 under conservatorship (when a judge appoints another person, a conservator, to manage the affairs and care for another adult), with diagnoses that included bipolar type schizoaffective disorder (illness that can cause hallucinations, delusions, and dramatic moods swings), diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 6/7/24, indicated resident could walk independently and did not use an elopement alarm (device that would alert…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when he was struck in the face by Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a swollen eye, severe headache and vomiting requiring hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 1's (Res 1) admission record indicated he was admitted in May 2024 with diagnosis of schizophrenia (mental illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors). A review of Resident 2's (Res 2) admission record indicated he was admitted in May 2024 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder). A review of Res 1's progress notes, dated 7/7/24 and written by the Licensed Nurse (LN), indicated Res 1 was struck in the face multiple times by Res 2 which resulted in a swollen eye, severe headache, and vomiting. A review of Res 2's progress note, dated 7/7/24 and written by the LN, indicated Res 2 admitted that he struck Res 1. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 9:34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe pharmaceutical services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the Licensed Nurse left Resident 1's brimonidine eye drops (medication to treat vision loss by lowering pressure) in his room unsupervised. This failure had the potential for abuse or misuse of the medication and the potential for not meeting the resident's therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility July 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care, primary open-angle glaucoma (eye disease that can cause vision loss) and insomnia due to other mental disorder. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/27/24, indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status, a cognitive assessment) of 9, meaning Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 4/3/24, at 11:17 a.m., with the Licensed Nurse (LN), the LN stated during the morning medication pass on 2/29/24, she had left Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe smoking practices for 17 residents (Resident 42; 196; 27, 78, 29, 72, 80, 2, 90, 82, 49, 75, 54, 74, 58, 73, and 71) for a census of 93 when: 1. Resident 42 and Resident 196 were in possession of cigarettes and a lighter and were smoking independently prior to the completion of a smoking assessment; 2. Resident 27 smoked without supervision, did not wear a smoking apron, and possessed cigarettes and a lighter; and, 3. Residents 78, 29, 72, 80, 2, 90, 82, 49, 75, 54, 74, 58, 73, and 71 smoked without using a smoking apron per signed consent/policy. These failures had the potential to jeopardize the residents' safety. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 42's admission record indicated she was admitted in 12/23 with diagnoses including tobacco use. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/30/24, indicated Resident 42 had no memory impairment. A review of Resident 42's clinical record included the following documents:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ,Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store medications for a census of 93 when emergency kits (E-kits) were stored beyond their expiration date and were not replaced in a timely manner. These failure decreased the facility's potential to safely administer medications during emergency situations. Findings During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/30/24 at 1:23 pm with Director of Nursing (DON) at Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], an Antibiotic E-kit had been opened with multiple E-kit logs, dated from the months of September 2023, October 2023, November 2023, December 2023 and January 2024. DON confirmed that the E-kit had been opened and should have been replaced by pharmacy within 72 hours. During a concurrent observation, record review and interview on 1/30/24 at 1:59 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) at Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], four E-kits were observed sealed with a blue plastic tie: -Injectable E-kit 1 of 2 was an E-kit log with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated correctly for a census of 93. This failure decreased the facility's potential to safely store medications. Findings During a concurrent interview and observation at 1/30/24 at 12:18 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6) at Medication Cart 1, the following medications were observed: - an unused and unopened multi-dose insulin (a medication to lower blood sugar) vial found with an open date of 1/29/24; and, - a used multi-dose insulin bottle found with an open date of 1/28/24 and a discard date written as 42 days; LN 6 stated that the unopened insulin vial should be in the fridge if it isn't in current use and the discard date should be in 28 days, not 42 days. During a concurrent interview and observation at 1/30/24 at 1:34 p.m., with LN 7 at Medication Cart 2: - a used Fluticasone Propionate/ Salmeterol DISKUS inhalation Powder (a multi-dose inhaler) 500 micrograms (mcg, a unit of measure)/50 mcg was found with no open date or discard date; - a used multi-dose bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner for a census of 93 when: 1. A snack was stored past its use by date; 2. Several food items were opened and not dated with their open date in the walk-in refrigerator and reach-in freezers; 3. The double ovens were observed with burnt, blackened debris on their bottoms; 4. Food items were opened, undated and did not include use by dates in the dry storage area; 5. The ice machine's interior was dirty; and, 6. The floor beneath the ice machine had areas of blackened debris along the bottom of the wall and between the tiles. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/29/24 beginning at 7:40 a.m., a small plastic bin on a refrigerator shelf contained a slice of buttered white toast in a plastic bag. The label on the bag indicated it had been prepared on 1/25/24. The Assistant Dietary Manager (DMA) stated prepared snacks were good for two days and confirmed the toast was past its use by date and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' health information for a census of 93 when tray tickets were disposed of in the trash. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect residents' personal health information. Findings: In a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/31/24 at 8:50 a.m., Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was at the dirty dish area scraping resident trays and stacking dishes for washing. DA 1 was discarding resident meal tickets in the regular trash with food and stated he normally threw the returned meal tickets into the trash. In an interview, on 1/31/24 at 9:05 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated any returned meal tickets were thrown in the trash. The DM confirmed residents' names and diet orders were on the tickets and agreed it was a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), a law which protects all individually identifiable health information) issue if they were going into the regular trash. A review of the facility's policy titled, Protected Health Information (PHI), Management and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 34, and Resident 36) specifically provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator and convenient venue. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide residents a neutral and fair arbitration process. Findings: A review of resident admission records indicated Resident 1 and Resident 34 were admitted to the facility in September 2023, and Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in February 2022. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 2:31 p.m. with Admissions Director (AD), Resident 1's, Resident 34's, and Resident 36's Resident-Facility Arbitration Agreement, dated 8/15/23, 10/6/23, and 9/29/23 consecutively were reviewed. AD confirmed each of the three residents' signed arbitration agreements did not provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator and convenient venue. During an interview on 1/31/24 at 4:01 p.m. with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated AD should have provided residents with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected one of 24 sampled residents' (Resident 47) status when Resident 47's pressure ulcer was not documented. This failure had the potential for inadequate wound care management. Findings: A review of Resident 47's admission record indicated she was admitted fall of 2021 with diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, an infection that is resistant to some antibiotics) in the wound. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool), dated 11/7/2023, revealed no problems with cognition. Resident 47 had the capacity to understand and participate in the plan of care and health care decisions. A document titled Surgical Consult, dated 2/2/2023, signed by the wound doctor indicated a consultation and evaluation of two stage 4 pressure ulcers (skin injury that has full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their Baseline Care Planning (BCP, identifies the resident's care needs immediately upon admission) policy and procedure for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 296) when Resident 296 was not provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. This failure had the potential to limit communication concerning the resident's goals, medications, diet, and therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 296's admission record indicated she was admitted in 1/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when blood sugar is too high) and obstructive sleep apnea (a disorder in which a person frequently stops breathing during sleep due to an upper airway obstruction). Resident 296 was capable of understanding rights, responsibilities, informed consent, and was able to make her own healthcare decisions. A review of Resident 296's clinical record revealed a BCP, dated 1/26/24, was developed by a nursing staff. In an interview on 1/30/24, at 10:40 a.m., with Resident 296, Resident 296…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 42, Resident 36, and Resident 296 ) when: 1. Resident 42 was not given a medication as ordered by the physician; 2. Oxygen was administered to Resident 36 without a humidifier as indicated in physician's orders; and 3. Resident 296 administered own insulin injection without a physician order. These failures increased the residents' potential to have unmet health needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 42's admission record indicated she was admitted in 12/23 with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening response by the body to infection). A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/30/24, indicated Resident 42 had no memory impairment. A review of Resident 42's clinical record included the following documents: An Order Audit Report, dated 1/30/24, indicated a physician's order on 12/20/23 for cefazolin sodium (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 296) when a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open during sleep) machine had not been applied at bedtime as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 296's respirations during sleep. Findings: A review of Resident 296's admission record indicated she was admitted in 1/2024 with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (a disorder in which a person frequently stops breathing during sleep due to an upper airway obstruction) and type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when blood sugar is too high). Resident 296 was capable of understanding rights, responsibilities, informed consent and was able to make own healthcare decisions. A physician order dated 1/26/2024 indicated Resident 296 must wear a CPAP machine at bedtime. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 10:48 a.m., inside Resident 296's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to maintain nutritive value for 19 residents receiving a therapeutic diet (foods of altered texure) for a census 93 when foods were prepared approximately 3 hours in advance and held in a 300 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement) oven. This failure had the potential to decrease the nutritive value of the foods being served. Findings: A Diet Order Tally Report, dated 1/31/24, indicated 19 residents received therapeutic diets. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/31/24 at 8:41 a.m. the [NAME] (CK) was asked when he prepared the therapeutic diets for lunch and he proceeded to open the oven and stated he had just finished 5 minutes ago. Two ¼ pans of pureed green beans and pureed chopped steak were in the oven along with 1/3 pans of bite-sized green beans, minced and moist green beans, brown rice and minced and moist chopped steak. The CK stated the foods were held in the oven at 300 degrees F until it was closer in time to tray line and then he would turn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. A review of Resident 86's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on 12/2023 and readmitted on 1/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when blood sugar is too high). Makes own health care decisions without memory problems. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/31/2024, at 7:35 a.m., during breakfast, observed Resident 86's meal tray was served by Certified Nurse Assistant 4 (CNA 4) and confirmed the meal tray consisted of 1 glass of milk, scrambled eggs, a piece of toast and a bowl of oatmeal. A concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 1/31/2024, at 7:40 a.m., with Resident 86, he complained he already requested the kitchen staff not to send oatmeal on his breakfast tray, but the tray still included a bowl of oatmeal. CNA 4 checked Resident 86's meal ticket, verified oatmeal was already written as one of his disliked foods. In a review of Resident 86's meal ticket for breakfast indicated Regular, Heart Healthy with Thin Liquids; Standing Order: 8 oz. whole milk; Dislike: Oatmeal. In an interview, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was properly disposed for a census of 93 when the facility's dumpster lids were left open. This failure had the potential to attract unwanted pests and vermin. Findings: In a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/29/24 at 2:57 p.m., the dumpster located near the side entrance to the facility was observed full of trash with both of its lids left open. The Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed the lids had been left open and should have been closed. A review of the facility's policy titled, Food - Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised 10/17, stipulated, All garbage and refuse containers are provided with tight-fitting lids or covers and must be kept covered when stored or not in continuous use.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control practices for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 47) when the Housekeeper did not apply the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, gloves gown and/or goggles/face shield if risk of splash and spray) while cleaning her room. This failure had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: In an observation on 1/29/2024, at 11 a.m., a Housekeeper was observed cleaning inside Resident 47's room, a room on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, infection control intervention to reduce transmission of resistant organisms) without wearing proper PPE. When asked if she's aware of the sign [EBP] posted outside the said room, Housekeeper quickly apologized and admitted to not wearing the proper PPE which she should have done before entering the room. In an interview on 1/29/2024, at 11:07 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 8 (LN 8), LN 8 confirmed the housekeeper was not wearing the appropriate PPE while cleaning inside Resident 47's room. During an interview on 1/31/2024, at 1 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received 12 hours of annual in-service which included dementia management and abuse prevention training for a census of 93 when documentation of the nurse aide in-services could not be provided for one of 5 sampled employees. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care and services provided to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 2:35 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed there was no documented dementia hours training and abuse training for Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3). Review of the facility's policy titled, In-Service Training, All Staff, revised 8/2022, indicated the required annual in-service training topics were dementia management and resident abuse prevention. Review of the facility's policy titled, In-Service Training, Nurse Aide, revised 8/2022, indicated the annual in-services are no less than 12 hours per employment year.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation for discharge for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was sent home without written instructions for medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in incorrect administration of medications and lack of coordination of care after discharge for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses that included perforation of the intestine (hole in the bowel), sepsis (blood poisoning) and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/20/23, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was able to think and reason. During a review of Resident 1's NSG [nursing]: Skilled Charting (NSC), dated 10/31/23, the NSC indicated, Pt. [patient] A&O [alert & oriented] with episodes of forgetfulness. During a review of Resident 1's IDT [interdisciplinary team]: Planned Discharge Summary (IDT), dated 11/1/23, the IDT indicated, Medication Reconciliation, Medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for Resident 1 and Resident 4 when a broken piece of sink linoleum and a pair of discarded gloves were found in the residents' bathroom. This failure had the potential for the residents to be injured, experience an unsanitary environment, and negatively impact residents' highest practicable well-being. Findings: During an observation on 9/18/23 at 11:52 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], an inspection of the bathroom revealed an area of broken linoleum that was separating on the front facing right side of the sink and a pair of used gloves on the floor under the sink. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 1:13 p.m., with the DON, the DON stated that rooms need to be kept clean and maintenance needed to be contacted for repairs in a timely fashion. Upon review of photographic evidence of the damaged area, she stated .that could cause injury to a resident, it could possibly cause skin damage and that could lead to a possible infection.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the proper medication administration policy was followed when a licensed nurse gave Resident 1 a medication that was taken from another resident's supply. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure safe medication administration for Resident 1. During a phone interview on 9/18/23 at 9:58 a.m., with Resident 1's husband, he stated one of the nurses stated he was going to give his wife medication that he took from another resident. During a record review of progress notes, dated 9/9/23 at 1:07 p.m., the health status note indicated on 9/8/23, the pm [after noon] shift nurse was administering meds and mentioned to the resident that one of the meds was borrowed from another resident. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 1:13 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated .that medications should be administered as policy. Medications should not be borrowed from another resident. During a record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised December 2012, indicated Medications ordered for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
2 of 5Horizon Health & Subacute CenterFresno, CA 2 of 5Temecula Healthcare CenterTemecula, CA 2 of 5Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CentWalnut Creek, CA 3 of 5Canyon Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 3 of 5English Oaks Convalescent & Rehabilitation HospitaModesto, CA 3 of 5Newport Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Smith Ranch Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenteSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5The Bradley GardensSan Jacinto, CA 4 of 5Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare CenterConcord, CA 4 of 5Castle Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNational City, CA 4 of 5Cedar Crest Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSunnyvale, CA 4 of 5Coronado Ridge Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CeHenderson, NV 4 of 5Lompoc Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterLompoc, CA 5 of 5Anberry Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAtwater, CA 5 of 5Arbor Hills Nursing CenterLa Mesa, CA 5 of 5Bradley CourtEl Cajon, CA 5 of 5Friendship Manor Nursing & Rehab CenterNational City, CA 5 of 5Heritage Park Nursing CenterUpland, CA 5 of 5Kearny Mesa Convalescent And Nursing HomeSan Diego, CA 5 of 5Lakeside Special Care CenterLakeside, CA 5 of 5Lawton Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Pleasanton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPleasanton, CA 5 of 5Plum Tree Care CenterSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Siena Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterAuburn, CA 5 of 5Stanford Court Skilled Nursing & Rehab CenterSantee, CA 5 of 5Vista Manor Nursing CenterSan Jose, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 10/06/2021
MASTROCOLA, LOISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/1998
OLDS, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/1998

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.2M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 7%Medicare 10%Other / private 83%

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$576per resident / day
operating cost
$17,513per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$542per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555459. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next