No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Crest Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

797 E Fremont Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94087 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (408) 738-4880 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 738-4880 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1021 S Wolfe Rd · (408) 737-7007 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
780 E El Camino Real · (408) 738-9430 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
826 E Fremont Ave · (408) 505-5501 · Call to confirm hours
Park
755 Dartshire Way · (408) 730-7751 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 53768 · (408) 466-1423

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.002.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.761.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 391 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.76U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 266 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.9%CMS range 59.7–69.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.2–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 4.2–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
23.8%
Total nursing turnover
7.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 87.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-11)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drinks were served at a safe and appetizing temperature when cold drinks were served with a temperature higher than 41F (Fahrenheit, unit of measurement).This failure had the potential to discourage residents from increasing the amount they eat and drink.Resident census was 80.Findings:During the kitchen tray line observation on 8/7/25 at 12:03 p.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), temperature of cold drinks being served were checked. Milk was 56.7 F and yogurt was 55.8 F. These drinks were kept in a black bin on a movable shelf and kitchen staff took one from the bin during tray line. DS stated cold drinks must be at temperature below 41 F. DS also stated it was due to the facility not having ice.A review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) entitled Meal Serving Temperatures dated 2023, the P&P indicated, .2.Cold food items shall be held at 41 degrees or below and served at not greater than temperatures of 45-50 degrees F at bedside or dining room to ensure serving temperatures are palatable.5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and maintenance of the ice bin (where ice is stored) when it was found to have black substances in the ice chute (ice dispenser), green substances on the corner edges, fine grayish particles on the exterior front, and was not cleaned according to the manufacturer's manual.Due to these systemic failures (as stated above) with potential to affect all residents and staff who uses and consumes ice from the ice bin, the facility needed to take immediate action to correct the noncompliance.On 8/6/25 at 7:30 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ, a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) was identified and declared, in the presence of the facility's Administrator (ADM) and their Regulatory and Operations Advisor (ROA).On 8/8/2025 at 3:18p.m., the IJ was removed after the ADM submitted an acceptable IJ Removal Plan (IJRP, a plan with interventions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when:1. The filter of Resident 6's oxygen concentrator was dusty;2. Licensed vocational nurse M (LVN M) did not cleanse her hands before administering Pataday eye drops (allergy itch relief eye drops) to Resident 12;3. Licensed vocational nurse N (LVN N) did not cleanse her hands and change gloves before administering Fluticasone nasal spray (used to relieve allergy symptoms in the nose) to Resident 95; and4. Unlabeled personal care items in a shared bathroom by multiple residents.Findings: 1. Review of Resident 6’s admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung). Review of Resident 6’s physician order, dated 7/17/25, indicated she has an order for oxygen at 2-4 liters (L, a metric unit of volume) per minute as needed for shortness of breath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating and sanitary conditions when:A bedside commode (a portable toilet, chair like structure to accommodate different user heights)'s metal pipe was found with dark brown patches and paint peeling off;Sink overflow drain hole area was found with black, white and dark brown spots in room C's bathroom;Lint filter and lint compartment with lint for dryer 1 and 2.The above failures had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of residents in the facility.Findings:1) During an observation on 8/5/2025 at 10:06 a.m., noted bed side commode placed on a toilet commode in a resident (room D)'s bathroom with dark brown patches and paint peeling off on metal pipe below and behind the seat cover.During an observation and interview with facility's maintenance aide (MA) on 10:14 a.m., MA confirmed a bedside commode metal pipe was rusted and painting was feeling off. MA stated this commode was left outside the facility for long time and caused the rust and paint to come off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible and within reach for one of 20 sample residents (Resident 100). This failure had the potential to result in the resident's needs not being met. Findings: During observation and concurrent interview on 8/5/25 at 3:25 p.m. in Resident 100's room, Resident 100 was in bed and was requesting for help. Resident 100's call light was wrapped around the bed side rail and was hanging off the bed. Resident 100's call light was not within the resident's reach. When asked what she needed help with, Resident 100 stated her incontinent brief needed to be changed. When asked whether she was able to reach her call light to ask for help, Resident 100 responded, No. During observation and concurrent interview on 8/5/25 at 3:27 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant O (CNA O) was instructed to assist Resident 100. When asked how Resident 100's call light should be positioned, CNA O did not respond. CNA O unwrapped Resident 100's call light from around the bed side rail and gave it to Resident 100.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to protect resident's confidential personal care and medical information for five out of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 92, 96, 26, 45, and 10) when:Personal care instructions were posted visible to public for Residents 92, 96, 26, and 45;The computer screen was opened and unattended with Resident 10's protected medical information in a hallway.This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the privacy and confidentiality of above sampled residents. Findings: 1. During an initial room rounds on 8/5/2025 at 9:36 a.m., noted open, handwritten care instruction, No straw please, on red color cover page, posted below the light fixture on the wall at the head of the bed (HOB) of Resident 92. This handwritten instruction was not covered and was visible to public in the resident's room. Review of Resident 92's face sheet (FS: a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 92 was admitted to facility on 7/23/2025. During room rounds on 8/5/2025 at 10:04 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the minimum data set (MDS: an assessment tool) for 1 of 3 sample resident (Resident 34) when Resident 34's MDS assessment did not reflect status of the resident. This failure had the potential to affect care and interventions for Resident 34.Findings: Review of Resident 34's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 34 was admitted to facility on 4/14/2021.Review of Resident 34's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), diabetes type 2 (a chronic condition that happens with persistent high blood sugar levels) and congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle is weakened or damaged, making it difficult for the heart to pump blood effectively).Review of Resident 34's physician orders indicated an order dated 7/13/2025 for enoxaparin (medication used to treat to prevent the formation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards for two of 20 residents (8 and 102) when their physician orders for clonazepam (used to treat anxiety - feelings of fear, worry, nervousness, and unease) and trazodone (used to treat depression - a mental disorder that negatively affects how the persons feel, think, act, and perceive the world) did not have indication for the frequency of administration. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8 and Resident 102 being overmedicated with medications capable of causing adverse effects.Findings:1. Review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident 8's physician order, dated 7/30/25, indicated she had an order for clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) as needed for anxiety. However, the order had no frequency of administration indicated.During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 8/11/25, at 2:43 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for one of seven sampled resident (Resident 26) when Resident 26's foley catheter (F/C: a catheter which inserted into a bladder [a body organ that stores the urine] and remains in place to drain urine) drain tube was noted with bloody urine and there was no order to continue use of the F/C. These failures had the potential to result in urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection cause by a bacteria [germ] that get into the bladder) and ill effects on the health and well-being of Resident 26.Findings:During an observation on 8/5/2025 at 3:20 p.m., observed Resident 26's F/C drain tube draining red color urine. Review of Resident 26's face sheet (FS: a document that provides resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 26 was admitted to facility on 7/5/2025.Review of Resident 26's diagnoses included myocardial infarction (a blockage of blood flow to the heart muscle), heart failure (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV, refers to giving medicines or fluids through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) therapy was consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders when one (Resident 97) out of two sampled residents had an unlabeled IV site and had no longer Physician Orders for medications to be administered through IV.This failure had the potential to put Resident 97 at risk for complications related to intravenous therapy such as phlebitis (inflammation of the vein). Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 10:32 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A in Resident 97's room, LVN A verified Resident 97's IV site on his right hand had no label.During an interview on 8/8/25 at 12:56 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated IV site must be labeled with the date when it was changed.During an observation on 8/11/25 at 10:55 a.m. in Resident 97's room, Resident 97 still had his IV on his right hand.During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and treatment services for oxygen (O2, a colorless, odorless gas) use was provided for two of five sampled residents (Residents 29 and 34) when:1. Facility staff did not post an Oxygen in use/No smoking sign on Resident 29's room entrance door;2. Resident 34's nasal cannula (NC, flexible tubing inserted into the nostrils and connected to an oxygen source) was not dated.These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' health and safety. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 29's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated 8/8/2025, indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of skin (an abnormal growth of cells that divide uncontrollably), hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) and anxiety disorder (a condition or excessive worry, feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 6 residents (6) was free from unnecessary medications when Resident 6 received morphine sulfate (used to treat pain) but was not monitored for the side effects and not care-planned on the use of the medication. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience unrecognized adverse effects.Findings:Review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident 6's physician orders, dated 7/17/25, indicated she had orders for morphine sulfate 20 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass)/milliliter (ml, a metric unit of volume) give 0.125 ml every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain and give 0.25 ml every 2 or 4 hours as needed for severe pain. However, the review of Resident 6's clinical record did not indicate that Resident 6 was monitored for the side effects and care-planned on the use of the medication.During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 8/11/25, at 2:36…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 8% when two medication errors occurred out of 25 opportunities during medication administrations for two out of seven residents (60 and 98). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders which resulted in residents not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medications and the residents' medications not accounted for.Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 8/7/25, at 4:53 p.m. with licensed vocational nurse G (LVN G), LVN G stated he did not have Artificial Tears Solution (eye drops used to lubricate dry eyes) on hand to give to Resident 60. Review of Resident 60's physician order, dated 8/8/21, indicated Resident 60 was to receive Artificial Tears Solution one drop in both eyes four times a day at 9 a.m., 1 p.m., 5 p.m., and 9 p.m.2. During a medication pass observation on 8/8/25, at 9:06 a.m. with LVN L, LVN L was to administer tramadol (used to relieve moderate to severe pain) 50 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure supplies were stored appropriately when expired incontinent wash bottle was found in the central supply room. This failure had the potential for the expired incontinent wash being used on the residents.Findings:On [DATE], at 3:54 p.m., during an observation in central supply room with central supply coordinator (CSC), one Ca-Rezz incontinent wash bottle was expired on 3/2025.During a concurrent observation and interview with the CSC, he observed the Ca-Rezz incontinent wash bottle and confirmed that it was expired, and he would put it away.Review of the facility's 2001 policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, indicated . 3. If the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to accommodate liquid consistency for one of five sampled residents (Resident 45). This failure had the potential for decreased meal intake, negative effect on health and well-being of Resident 45.Findings: During an observation of lunch meal in dining room on 8/5/2025 at 12:15 p.m., noted Resident 45 lunch meal tray was served with thick consistency white liquid in a plastic cup, not able to come out of the cup when tilted to the sides. Also noted flowing consistency apple juice in a plastic cup was in lunch tray. Resident 45 refused to drink thick white consistency liquid from lunch tray. Resident 45 consumed 3/4th cup of flowing consistency apple juice when fed by staff.Review of Resident 45's face sheet (FS: a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 45 was admitted to facility on 10/3/2023. Review of Resident 45 diagnoses included cerebral infarction (occurs when blood vessel supplying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans for six out of twenty-two sampled residents (Residents 37, 1, 53, 71, 41, and 2), when the activity care plans of Residents 37, 1, 53, 71, 41, and 2 were not comprehensive and resident-centered. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 37's face sheet (a document that gives the resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified nondisplaced fracture (the bone typically stays aligned in an acceptable position for healing) of surgical neck of left humerus (a bony constriction at the proximal end of shaft of the upper arm bone), subsequent encounter for fracture (broken bone) with routine healing, history of falling, and other abnormalities of gait (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen utensils and equipment were maintained in good condition and stored in accordance with professional standards for safety when baking pans and magnetic knife holder were not kept in good working conditions. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms, which could cause foodborne illness (illness caused by food or water contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) and cross contamination of food that could affect the 81 residents residing and consuming food at the facility. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 3/25/2024 at 9:21 a.m. with the dietary supervisor (DS), observed ten baking pans with brownish to dark colored spots that looked dirty and rusty and one magnetic knife holder with kitchen knives attached to it with brownish discolorations that looked dirty and rusty as well. During an interview with the DS on 3/25/24 at 9:30 a.m., the DS verified the ten baking pans that looked dirty and rusty and removed them right away. The DS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was found that the hospital's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was ineffective. Despite its purpose to proactively identify and prevent medication administration errors, it fell short. This was evident during a medication pass observation conducted during the survey, which revealed a concerning 13% medication error rate (See F759). Findings: On 3/26/24, a review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed a physician's order for Flonase (Fluticasone) 50 micrograms. The instructions were to administer one spray in each nostril once daily for the treatment of allergies. However, during an observation at 8:02 AM on the same day, a Licensed Vocational Nurse A (LVN A) administered Flonase to Resident 19 but did not follow the prescribed instructions. Instead of one spray in each nostril, LVN A sprayed two sprays in each nostril. This discrepancy between the prescribed dosage and the actual administration could potentially result in an excessive dose, leading to adverse effects or reduced treatment efficacy. Later that day, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to treat one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 390) with respect and dignity when Certified Nurse Assistant E (CNA E) was standing while feeding the resident. This failure had the potential to negatively affect residents' emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 390's clinical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During an observation and interview on 3/26/24 at 8:32 a.m. with CNA E, CNA E was observed standing over Resident 390 while feeding the resident. Licensed Vocational Nurse J (LVN J) was observed in the room for medication administration. CNA E confirmed the observation. CNA E stated she should have sit down while feeding residents but she did not sit down on a chair. During an interview on 3/26/24 at 8:35 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse J, she confirmed the above observation. LVN J stated CNA E should have sit down to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the status of the resident's advance directive (AD, a written set of instructions, such as a living will or durable power of attorney, which is a document that authorizes to act on behalf of the resident for health care when the individual is incapacitated) for one of seven residents investigated (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for the resident's wishes to not be fulfilled, and not address. Findings: Review of Resident 2's face sheet (a document that gives residents' information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including angioneurotic edema (which usually presents with episodic and unpredictable swellings of the head and neck, especially of the tongue and oropharynx), subsequent encounter, unspecified heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and unspecified hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of three residents (Resident 79). Failure to accurately assess had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to provide resident-centered discharge care planning and interventions for the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 79's face sheet (a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced (the ends of the bone have come out of alignment) intertrochanteric (located between the greater and lesser trochanters and is composed of dense trabecular bone) fracture (broken bone) of left femur (thigh bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture (a break in the continuity of the bone which does not communicate with the outside of the body) with routine healing, unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 390) when staff failed to ensure oxygen was administered as specified in the physician's order. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' health and safety. Findings: Review of Resident 390's clinical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (inability to keep oxygen and carbon dioxide at normal levels). Review of Resident 390's physician's order, dated 3/21/24, indicated he was to receive oxygen (O2) at 2 liters per minute (LPM, rate of oxygen administration) via a nasal cannula (flexible tubing placed into the nostrils and connected to an oxygen source) every shift. Review of Resident 390's care plan for admitted on oxygen therapy indicated, Administer oxygen as ordered by physician. During an observation on 3/27/24 at 8:08 a.m., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently complete the dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) communication form after dialysis for one of five residents (Resident 381) who received dialysis services. This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to identify and address potential complications after dialysis. Findings: Review of Resident 381's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidneys are no longer able to work as they should to meet the body's needs). The clinical record further indicated Resident 381 received dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of Resident 381's dialysis communication forms indicated that To be filled up by licensed nurse receiving patient from dialysis on the dialysis communication form was not completed consistently. The dialysis communication form was to be completed by the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was found that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During the medication pass, four medication errors were observed out of thirty opportunities for three of seven residents, resulting in an error rate of 13%. Findings: A review on 3/26/24 of Resident 19's clinical record revealed a physician's order for Flonase (Fluticasone) 50 microgram, with the following instructions: *Administration: One spray in each nostril *Frequency: Once daily *Indication: Treatment of allergies During an observation on 03/26/24 at 8:02 AM, a Licensed Vocational Nurse A (LVN A) administered Flonase to Resident 19. LVN A sprayed two sprays in each nostril instead of the prescribed one spray in each nostril as indicated in the physician's orders. This discrepancy between the prescribed dosage and the actual administration could potentially result in an excessive dose, which may lead to adverse effects or reduced treatment efficacy. During an interview conducted on 03/26/24 at 2:45 PM, LVN A confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. One laundry staff did not perform hand hygiene before handling clean linens and residents' personal clothings; and 2. For Resident 381, staff did not perform hand hygiene during her treatment. These failures had the potential to spread infections, and compromise resident's health and safety in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with the maintenance director (MD) on 3/28/24, at 11:00 a.m., in the laundry room, the MD stated that the clean area was located on the right side of the room, designated for linens (such as sheets, blankets, and pillows), towels, bibs, and residents' personal clothing. It was noted that laundry staff H (LS H) entered the laundry room and began folding linens in the designated clean area. Subsequently, LS I entered the laundry room and performed hand hygiene before handling clean linens and residents' personal clothing, while LS H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and services for seven of 41 sampled residents (Residents 12, 11, 45, 66, 7 and 8) when: 1. Staff did not develop a personalized and resident-centered care plan, or document any follow-up treatment/skin reassessment when Resident 12 sustained a hematoma (a collection of blood, usually clotted, outside of a blood vessel that may occur because of an injury to the wall of a blood vessel) and cut on her right eyebrow. 2. Staff did not follow the physician's order to place floor/landing pad next to the bed when Resident 11 was in bed. 3. Staff did not follow the physician's order for bilateral heel floaters while in bed for Resident 45. 4. Licensed nurses did not follow the physician's orders for pain medication based on the residents' pain level for Residents 66 and 7. 5. Licensed nurses did not follow ordered parameters for blood pressure medication for Resident 8. These failures had the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures when: 1. The nebulizer face mask and tubing for two Residents (24 and 28) were found undated and uncovered. 2. Licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not perform hand hygiene and did not change gloves after touching potentially contaminated surfaces during the medication administration for Resident 42. 3. The two staff did not perform hand hygiene during dining observation. These failures put residents, staff and visitors at risk of possible spread of infection. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 24's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and asthma (a long-term disease of the lungs, causing the airways to inflame and narrow, making it hard to breathe). Review of Resident 24's physician order indicated he had an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for two of 41 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 19), to reflect the fall incidents that occurred prior to the scheduled MDS assessment. MDS assessments should be accurate so as to provide the appropriate fall interventions to help prevent residents' further falls. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 12's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated the fall incident with no injury was not coded in item J 1800. Resident 12's fall incident on 9/13/2020 was not addressed on this assessment. 2. A review of Resident 19's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated the fall incident with minor injury was not coded in item J 1800. Resident 19's fall incident on 6/24/21 with minor injury was not addressed on this assessment. During the clinical record review and concurrent interview on 11/4/21 at 11:34 a.m., the minimum data set coordinator (MDSC) confirmed that the fall incidents for Residents 12 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and reconciled for 3 out of 4 randomly selected residents (Residents 66, 329 and 330) and, to ensure safe and effective use of medications for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 32) when: 1. Three out of four randomly selected residents' (Residents 66, 329, and 330) controlled medication (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) records did not reconcile. The nursing staff signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but did not document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate the controlled medications were given to the residents. This failure had the potential for misuse or diversion of controlled medications; and 2. Resident 32 received ferrous sulfate (iron, for prevention/treatment of iron deficiency anemia) and calcium (a medication used to prevent or treat low blood calcium level)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 43) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors, example is antipsychotics) when: 1. Resident 17 received quetiapine (brand name: Seroquel, antipsychotic medication) 50 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) since 5/7/2019 without a gradual dose reduction (GDR, a tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued); and there was no documented clinical rationale by the physician for why an attempted GDR was not indicated. The failure had the potential to result in complications from long term use of Seroquel such as movement disorders, falls with injury, cerebrovascular adverse events [cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), commonly referred to as stroke, and transient ischemic events], and increased risk of death. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had 7.69 percent medication error rate when two medication errors out of 26 opportunities were identified during the medication pass for one of five residents (Resident 42). These failures had the potential to result in an ineffective drug therapy and possible adverse events (such as side effects) for the resident. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 11/01/21 at 9:06 a.m., licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) crushed one tablet of ferrous sulfate (iron pill, to treat or prevent iron deficiency anemia) 325 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement). She mixed it with about 10 milliliters (ml, volume of measurement) of water and administered to Resident 42 through the gastrostomy tube (G-tube or GT, feeding tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach). During an interview with LVN A on 11/01/21 at 9:58 a.m., LVN A stated the facility had been using the same ferrous sulfate brand from Manufacturer A (MNFTR A), and the nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store medications and biologicals when: 1. A bottle of lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) oral liquid solution for Resident 42 was opened but not dated. 2. A vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (to test for tuberculosis [TB]) was opened but not dated. 3. Two Systane eyedrops (Artificial Tears) were opened but not dated in medication cart #4. 4. A vial of Heparin (blood thinner to treat or prevent blood clots) injection solution was opened but not dated in medication cart #2. 5. Breo inhaler (medication for breathing problems) was open but not dated in medication cart #2. The deficient practice had the potential for the products to be used beyond the date they were safe and effective for use. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON), on 11/01/21 at 11:01 a.m., in Medication Room Two, an inspection of the medication refrigerator identified a bottle of lorazepam oral liquid solution for Resident 42, which was opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
Health inspection 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
2 of 5Horizon Health & Subacute CenterFresno, CA 2 of 5Temecula Healthcare CenterTemecula, CA 2 of 5Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CentWalnut Creek, CA 3 of 5Canyon Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 3 of 5English Oaks Convalescent & Rehabilitation HospitaModesto, CA 3 of 5Newport Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Smith Ranch Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenteSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5The Bradley GardensSan Jacinto, CA 4 of 5Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare CenterConcord, CA 4 of 5Castle Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNational City, CA 4 of 5Coronado Ridge Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CeHenderson, NV 4 of 5Gramercy CourtSacramento, CA 4 of 5Lompoc Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterLompoc, CA 5 of 5Anberry Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAtwater, CA 5 of 5Arbor Hills Nursing CenterLa Mesa, CA 5 of 5Bradley CourtEl Cajon, CA 5 of 5Friendship Manor Nursing & Rehab CenterNational City, CA 5 of 5Heritage Park Nursing CenterUpland, CA 5 of 5Kearny Mesa Convalescent And Nursing HomeSan Diego, CA 5 of 5Lakeside Special Care CenterLakeside, CA 5 of 5Lawton Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Pleasanton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPleasanton, CA 5 of 5Plum Tree Care CenterSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Siena Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterAuburn, CA 5 of 5Stanford Court Skilled Nursing & Rehab CenterSantee, CA 5 of 5Vista Manor Nursing CenterSan Jose, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/20/2023
MASTROCOLA, LOISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/1998
OLDS, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/1998

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 26%Other / private 69%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$533per resident / day
operating cost
$16,205per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$615per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555790. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next