Lawton Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
1575 7th Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 68 certified beds · (415) 566-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 311 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 69.7%CMS range 63.6–75.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 6.5–11.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 29.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 4.4–8.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.37 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.38 to 1.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain required screening documents to determine whether one of two sampled residents (Resident 47) required active treatment or other care services appropriate for mental health condition when Resident 47 had no Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement that aims to confirm presence of mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities, to assess applicant's need for nursing facility service, and to assess whether the applicant requires specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services) evaluation in the presence of schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) diagnosis.This failure had the potential for facility admitting Resident 47 to incorrect care setting and implementing incorrect care services that did not meet the resident's needs.Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store foods and maintain kitchen utensils in a sanitary manner. When: 1. An opened Thousand Island dressing container was found undated, and 2. A drawer with kitchen utensils was found to have bread crumbs on the floor of the drawer. These deficient practices will potentially have negative ill effect to the residents' health outcome, and a continous practice of cross contamination of kitchen utensils to food served to all residents in the facility. FINDINGS: 1. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/28/24 at 10:15 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), and the Registered Dietitian (RD), an opened original plastic container of Thousand Island dressing with no open date was found on the top shelf of the produce refrigerator. It is about 1/3 full with spilled, dried and sticky yellowish/orangey dressing spill on the lid to the neck and shoulder of the container. Observed the DM removed the Thousand Island dresssing container from the refrigerator and looked for the label when the container was opened. The DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (medications that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) were fully accounted for when they were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory or count sheet) but not documented on the medication administration record (MAR) for three out of five residents (Residents 12, 19, and 202); and a controlled medication for a resident (Resident 204) was destroyed without a witness' signature as per facility policy and procedure. The failures had the potential for medication errors and controlled drug abuse or diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally). Findings: 1. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 2:27 p.m., with the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) about as needed medications, she explained that when the resident requested a medication, the nurse assesses the resident, reviews the physician's order, obtains the medication from the med cart, administers it to the resident, documents it on the MAR & the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required square footage per resident in multiple bedrooms for 17 out of 28 rooms (Rooms 101, 102,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 115, 126, 127, 131, 132, 134, 136 and 139). This failure had the potential for inadequate usable space for the provision of residents' care and may impact their quality of life. Findings: Review of the facility's request for a waiver dated 3/2/24, indicated the following bedrooms failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident. Room Number Number of Beds in Room Square Feet Per Resident Square Feet Total 101 2 78.75 157.5 102 3 75 225 103 3 75 225 104 2 78.75 157.5 105 2 78.75 157.5 106 3 75 225 107 3 75 225 108 2 78.75 157.5 111 3 75 225 115 3 75 225 126 2 78.75 157.5 127 2 78.75 157.5 131 2 78.75 157.5 132 3 75 225 134 2 78.75 157.5 136 3 75 225 139 2 78.75 157.5 During random observations and interviews of residents that occupied the above-mentioned rooms, during the survey, the residents expressed no concerns about quality of life, quality of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.69% when two medication errors occurred out of 26 opportunities during the medication administration for one out of six residents (Resident 18). The failures resulted in the nursing staff not following the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and had the potential for the resident not receiving full therapeutic effects or causing side effects for the residents. Findings: 1. During the medication administration observation on 10/28/24 at 4:35 p.m., Registered Nurse 1 (RN1) was observed preparing and administering 3 medications to Resident 18: metformin (medication for diabetes) 500 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) 1 tablet, calcium (a supplement) 500 mg 1 tablet, and brimonidine ophthalmic solution (medication for glaucoma) 0.15%. Resident was sitting up in her wheelchair. RN1 did not have the resident tilt her head back. With the resident's head/face looking straight ahead, RN1 instilled 1 drop of brimonidine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when an unlabeled basin containing exposed personal care items were kept on an overbed table in between the beds of Resident 6 and Resident 15. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination and spread of infection in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 10/28/24 at 9:56 AM, an emesis basin (a shallow container used to catch fluids or debris from a patient) containing a tube of toothpaste, an exposed toothbrush, a packaged toothbrush, and a deodorant was found on an overbed table in between the beds of Resident 6 and Resident 15. During further observation on 10/28/24 at 10:48 AM, the kidney basin containing the aforementioned items was still on the overbed table in between the beds of Resident 6 and Resident 15. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/28/24 at 10:52 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated, Not sure, when asked who the personal care items belong to. CNA 1 added, Not supposed to be there. I was going to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent unauthorized departure from the facility of one sampled resident (Resident 1) when, there was no front desk staff to closely monitor individuals coming in and out of the front door on 7/10/23, evening shift. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's unauthorized departure from the facility on 7/10/23. Resident 1 showed up in the emergency room of a nearby Acute Care hospital on 7/10/23 and was returned to the facility the following day, 7/11/23. Elopement as defined in the facility policy is the occurrence of a resident leaving the premises or a safe area without authorization (i.e. an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or any necessary supervision to do so. Findings: Review of the admission Record dated 8/1/23 indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the History & Physical dated 4/24/23 indicated, Resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, on March 20, 2023, the facility failed to ensure that the residents in both the South side and the North side receive their prescribed medications in a timely manner, and the wasted medication (refused med) was disposed of safely according to professional standards when . 1. RN1 observed administering the scheduled 9:00 AM medication on the South side on 3/20/23 between 10:20 AM to 12:20 PM to three of his 27 residents. 2. RN2 observed administering the scheduled 9:00 AM medication on the North side on 3/20/23 at 11:30 AM to two of her 29 residents. 3. RN1 observed discarding (disposing) the resident's refused medication in a regular uncovered garbage bin on the side of the medication cart instead of discarding the pill in the incinerator. The facility's failure to administer medications to 2 of 2 units timely, and disposing of refused medication according to the standard of practices' policy and procedure had the potential to affect the residents negatively.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review on 3/22/23 in the medication room, the facility failed to ensure that the biologicals were labeled and stored according to acceptable professional standards when . 1. Two quality control solutions (high and low) were found on the shelf opened but not dated. 2. A refrigerator storing laboratory (stool) specimen was found in the clean medication storage room. Note: Cross referenced in F880, Infection Control. 3. An opened package of unused, Lidocaine Patch was found in Resident 17's room on 3/20/23. This deficient practices have the potential to: 1. Result in inaccuracies in blood sugar monitoring, 2. Contaminate drugs, biologicals and nutritional supplements, 3. Result in overdosage to the resident or diversion of this drug (illegal use of drugs). Findings: 1. During medication storage observation on 3/22/23 at 9:35 AM the two bottles of quality control solutions for glucometer were found taped together with an ivory paper tape, on one of the shelves. One bottle with yellow cap/cover (Low control solution), one bottle with blue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There was no hands-free trash bin for disposal of used paper towels after handwashing in the kitchen. 2. Unlabeled, undated, and expired food items stored in the kitchen were available for resident consumption. 3. A cart holding two opened jugs of cooking oil was lined with parchment paper soaked in oil. The base and legs of the cart was covered with grimy, gray-colored, fuzzy substance. 4. An exposed and uncovered metal scoop with yellow-colored powdery substance was placed on top of a container of food seasoning. 5. A plastic bottle containing vinegar had a broken plastic cap with an irregular sized hole with jagged, sharp edges. This deficient practice may put the residents who receive food from the facility kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses, for injury, and may affect the appetite of the residents due to loss of potency and flavor of expired food seasonings/flavoring. Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review on 3/22/23 at 9:45 AM the facility failed to maintain infection control practices in the clean medication storage room when . 1. A hazardous waste or biohazard refrigerator used to store laboratory specimens was found in the medication room. 2. The biohazard refrigerator contained an unlabeled container with stool specimen in the lowest shelf. 3. LVN2 was observed taking out the old unlabeled stool specimen from inside the refrigerator with her bare hands. 4. LVN2 discarded the unlabeled stool specimen in the regular garbage bin in the hallway by the sink near the entrance of the nurses' station instead of in the biohazard container in the biohazard room. This failure to maintain appropriate infection control practices has the potential to contaminate sterile and clean drugs, biologicals, and nutritional supplements in the clean medication room, which will affect the health and safety of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/22/23 at 9:45 AM in the clean medication storage room, a small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment were maintained in safe operating condition when preventive maintenance was not done for 6 out of 6 Low Air Loss (LAL) mattresses (composed of inflatable air tubes that alternately inflate and deflate which relieves pressure under the body to help ensure proper air circulation, and help prevent and treat the occurrence of pressure wounds [injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin]) used by residents. This failure did not ensure patient care equipment used were safe and maintained according to the manufacturer's recommendations to ensure optimal function and performance. Findings: During an initial tour observation on 3/20/23 at 10:26 AM, of Room A, the resident in Bed A laid on his bed and was awake. A control box hung on the foot end of the bed which was attached to the mattress. The control box indicated, Lawton Property. The control box had an orange sticker on the side panel that indicated, Preventive Maintenance, Date Performed 8/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required square footage per resident in multiple bedrooms for 17 out of 28 rooms (Rooms 101, 102,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 115, 126, 127, 131, 132, 134, 136 and 139). This failure had the potential for inadequate usable space for the provision of residents' care and may impact their quality of life. Findings: Review of the facility's request for a waiver dated 3/22/23, indicated the following bedrooms failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident. Room Number Number of Beds in Room Square Feet Per Resident Square Feet Total 101 2 78.75 157.5 102 3 75 225 103 3 75 225 104 2 78.75 157.5 105 2 78.75 157.5 106 3 75 225 107 3 75 225 108 2 78.75 157.5 111 3 75 225 115 3 75 225 126 2 78.75 157.5 127 2 78.75 157.5 131 2 78.75 157.5 132 3 75 225 134 2 78.75 157.5 136 3 75 225 139 2 78.75 157.5 During random observations and interviews of residents that occupied the above-mentioned rooms, during the survey, the residents expressed no concerns about quality of life, quality of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident rooms that were maintained and kept in good repair for 6 out of 6 sampled rooms, occupied by residents, (Rooms A, Rooms B, Rooms C, Room D, Room E, and Room F) out of 28 total resident rooms in the building. This failure did not provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/23 that began at 9:45 AM, with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS confirmed and acknowledged the following findings: 1. Room A's wall from behind the residents' beds had wallpaper that peeled off from the wall. 2. Room A's cabinet door panel was broken, with uneven and sharp edges. 3. Room A's threshold trim or transition strip (used to join or bridge the gap between two floors) at the entrance was missing on the floor. 4. Room B's wall from behind the residents' beds had wallpaper and paint that peeled off. 5. Room C's wall from behind the residents' beds had wallpaper and paint that peeled off. 6. Room C's television cables that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered, comprehensive care plan was developed, for a medication prescribed for anxiety, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) on psychotropic (any drug affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. This failure had the potential to not meet and address the resident's preferences and goals to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission record, the record indicated Resident 7's medical history included congestive heart failure (a weak heart causing less blood circulation throughout the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung disease causing breathing problems), depression, and anxiety disorder. During a review of Resident 7's physician's order summary report, dated 3/22/23, the report indicated a medication that included, Hydroxyzine . for anxiety m/b [manifested by] calling nursing station all the time. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of sampled residents (Resident 5) was free from accident and hazards when the facility failed to monitor Resident 5 to prevent Resident 5 from an avoidable fall. The resident was at high risk for falls; Resident 5 was found to have fallen face down in the resident's room on 3/13/23 with injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 5 sustaining laceration on her forehead, some abrasions on her face and cervical injury. Findings: The clinical record of Resident 5 was reviewed. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/12/23, indicated that Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on on 02/28/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which includes: Hypertension (High blood pressure), arthritis (joint pain or joint disease) Osteoporosis (bone mineral and density decline) abnormalities of gait and mobility, spinal stenosis, cervical region (when the space inside the backbone becomes too small) etc. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician-prescribed diet order of double portions for all meals for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 45) when Resident 45 was plated one scoop of rice instead of two scoops. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake, and could result in unplanned weight loss that could further compromise the medical and nutritional status of Resident 45. Findings: Resident 45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, but not limited to, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH - bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain), hydrocephalus (accumulation of too much fluid in the brain), and encephalopathy (disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure). During meal plating observation on 3/22/23 at 12:04 PM with the Kitchen Supervisor (KS) and the Registered Dietitian (RD), Dietary [NAME] 2 (DC 2) plated one scoop of steamed rice for Resident 45. A concurrent interview and review of Resident 45's meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family were implemented when 2 expired peanut butter jars were found in Resident 17's room. This failure had the potential to cause unsafe consumption of expired foods by Resident 17. Findings: During an initial tour observation on 3/20/23 at 11:43 AM, in Resident 17's room, the resident was in bed, awake, but did not respond when greeted. There was a box without a lid on top of the resident's bedside table that contained 2 peanut butter jars. During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/8/22, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated a score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/23 at 12:04 PM, in Resident 17's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), CNA 1 stated the family brought foods for the resident to eat. CNA 1 stated the resident loved to eat peanut butter and bananas. Resident 17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required square footage per resident in multiple bedrooms for 17 out of 28 rooms (Rooms 101, 102,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 115, 126, 127, 131, 132, 134, 136 and 139). This failure had the potential for inadequate usable space for the provision of residents' care and may impact their quality of life. Review of the facility's request for a waiver dated 4/3/26, indicated the following bedrooms failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident.Room Number Number of Beds Room Square Feet Per Resident Square Feet Total 101 2 78.75 157.5102 3 75 225103 3 75 225104 2 78.75 157.5105 2 78.75 157.5106 3 75 225107 3 75 225108 2 78.75 157.5111 3 75 225115 3 75 225126 2 78.75 157.5127 2 78.75 157.5131 2 78.75 157.5132 3 75 225134 2 78.75 157.5136 3 75 225139 2 78.75 157.5 During random observations and interviews of residents that occupied the above-mentioned rooms, during the survey, the residents expressed no concerns about quality of life, quality of care and safety related to the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIFE GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2017 |
| MASTROCOLA, LOIS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2017 |
| OLDS, THOMAS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2017 |
| SMITH, FRED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/20/2017 |
| BME HOLDCO A LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2017 |
| BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2025 |
| GHC MASTER SAN FRAN, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2017 |
| THERAGEN, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2017 |
| CERIN, LUISITO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2020 |
| CLAYSON, DARBY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2019 |
| DALY, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/18/2017 |
| DARAGAN, NATALIYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/30/2017 |
| LEONG, DOROTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/23/2022 |
| LORD, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/29/2024 |
| TIMES, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2021 |
| ZABALA, DOROTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/12/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055175. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.