Arbor Hills Nursing Center
7800 Parkway Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (619) 460-2330 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,831 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-01)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 261 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.5%CMS range 57.0–67.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.4–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.7–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to identify and address a decline in range of motion (ROM - how far a joint can move or stretch) for one of two residents (Resident 27) reviewed for limited range of motion. This failure resulted in a decline Resident 27's full movement potential of his hands (such as fully closing his hands to grasp or make a fist), which made it difficult for Resident 27 to cut up food items and fully grasp utensils during meals. In addition, this failure had the potential for Resident 27 to independently complete all other activities of daily living such as grooming, dressing and personal hygiene. Findings: A review of Resident 27's undated admission Record indicated that Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis (condition in which bones become weak and brittle). During an initial tour of the facility on 10/29/24 at 9:40 A.M., an observation and interview of Resident 27 was conducted. Resident 27 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure completion of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation (a state-required process that determines whether an individual with indicators of serious mental illness is appropriate for nursing facility placement and requires specialized mental health services) was conducted for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (3). As a result, the required Level II evaluation was not conducted, placing Resident 3 at risk of not receiving mental health and specialized services. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE] following a hospitalization, with diagnoses of depression and unspecified psychosis. A record review of Resident 3's PASRR Level I, dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 3 screened positive for serious mental illness and required a Level II evaluation. A record review of the state PASRR authority's correspondence letter, dated 11/20/25, indicated, .NOTICE OF ATTEMPTED EVALUATION.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to the care of the intravenous (IV) access site (used to deliver medicines, fluids, blood products, or nutrition into a patient's bloodstream) for one of one resident reviewed for care planning (Resident 32). This failure had the potential for increased risk of infection and complications related to IV access site.Findings: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure (long-term condition where the heart's main pumping chamber (left ventricle) becomes weak, enlarged, or stiff, reducing its ability to contract and push enough oxygen-rich blood to the body), per the facility's admission record. On 02/10/26 at 9:28 A.M. an observation and an interview was conducted with Resident 32 in his room. Resident 32 was resting in bed while family members were in the room. Resident 32 showed his right arm and expressed concern about his IV access site.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and assess the intravenous (IV) access site (used to deliver medicines, fluids, blood products, or nutrition into a patient's bloodstream) for one of one resident reviewed for IV hydration (Resident 32). This failure had the potential for increased risk of infection and complications related to the IV access site.Findings: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure (long-term condition where the heart's main pumping chamber (left ventricle) becomes weak, enlarged, or stiff, reducing its ability to contract and push enough oxygen-rich blood to the body) and long term use of anticoagulant (blood thinners, are medications that prevent or reduce blood clot formation in veins and arteries), per the facility's admission record. On 02/10/26 at 9:28 A.M. an observation and an interview was conducted with Resident 32 in his room. Resident 32 was resting in bed while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to do an annual performance evaluation to verify competency for one of five certified nursing assistants (CNAs) 1.This failure had the potential to affect clients' well-being, should the staff be unable to perform duties competently. Findings: On 02/12/26 at 10:10 A.M., a concurrent review of the personnel files and interview was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and Assistant Director of Staff Development (ADSD). CNA 1 was hired on 7/30/13. The DSD and ADSD stated the most recent performance evaluations in CNA 1's personnel file was dated 4/16/20. On 02/12/26 at 3:16 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated staff should undergo performance evaluations annually to ensure they have the necessary skills to provide quality care and maintain compliance. A review of the facility's provided documentation titled, Performance Evaluations, dated 9/20, indicated .job performance of each employee shall be reviewed and evaluated at least annually .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for the facility's drying procedure when dietary food service trays and food covers were stacked wet and not allowed to completely air dry. This failure had the potential for resident illness from contamination and bacterial growth.Findings: On 02/10/2026 at 10:15 A.M. an observation was conducted of the sanitization process for the facility dishwasher. Dietary Aide (DA) 5 stacked together a rack of food lids and a rack of meal delivery trays that were still wet. On 2/10/26 at 10:25 A.M. an interview was conducted with DA 5. DA 5 stated all plates, trays and covers are left to air dry for a few minutes after coming out of the dishwasher. DA 5 stated there should not be any moisture at all between items and any moisture on the dishes or utensils would make the paper [the staff] use, like napkins and diet cards, wet and illegible. On 2/10/26 at 10:45 A.M. the Manager for Dietary Services (MDS) was interviewed. The MDS stated it is the policy and expectation that all items are air dried before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure infections control practices were implemented for 3 of 24 sampled residents (1, 90,122) when:a) Linens soiled with an infectious bacteria, clostridium difficile (C.Diff, infection of the intestines that causes severe diarrhea), were not contained,b) Resident 1's urinary drainage bag was positioned above the level of the bladder, andc) A trash bag with dirty and used tissues and meal tray were placed next to each other. This failure had the potential to spread infections to Residents 1, 90 and 122. a) Resident 122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C.Diff, infection of the intestines that causes severe diarrhea) per the facility admission record. During an observation and interview on 2/9/26 at 3:20 PM, a strong odor of stool was noted upon entering Resident 122's room. In the bathroom, multiple towels visibly soiled with yellow stool overflowed from a small open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to communicate among staff members to refer a resident (Resident 1) to a psychiatrist (psych, a medical doctor who can diagnose and treat mental health conditions) or psychologist (psych, scientific discipline that studies mental states and processes and behavior in humans) who had a behavioral manifestation for one of three sampled residents reviewed for behavioral assessment. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to become aggressive to other residents and staff. Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder (MDD, a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), per the facility's admission Record. A record review was conducted of Resident 1. Resident 1's History and Physical (H & P), dated 8/4/24, indicated the attending physician (AP) documented Resident 1 needed further evaluation to determine his mental capacity. Per H&P, Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Resident 1's plan of care of having two-person assistance when one-person assistance provided during care. As a result, Resident 1 had a witnessed fall and sustained a traumatic hematoma of the forehead (closed wound with blood collection following the fall. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant (complete weakness of one side of the body and weakness on one part of the body following a stroke), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) following a stroke and epilepsy per the facility admission Record. A review of Resident 1's physician history and physical examination (H&P) on 1/23/24 indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the fall risk evaluation indicated: 10/25/2025 indicated a score of 24 which meant a high risk of fall 1/30/25 indicated a score of 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was in a palatable (pleasant and appealing), flavorful manner that maintained the nutritional value of the menu items served. This failure had the potential to decrease residents' meal intake and contribute to weight loss. The facility census was 86. Cross-Reference F867 Findings: During a dining observation on 10/29/24 the following confidential resident food concerns occurred: - 8:26 A.M., did not like the food, bad taste. - 9 A.M., did not like food: processed meat, cold food, mashed vegetables, spicy dinner last night .lost weight per preference but also due to not liking the food . - 9:16 A.M., breakfast always scrambled eggs, cold food. - 9:21 A.M., food was always cold. - 9:32 A.M., food not good, no taste, sometimes cold. - 9:52 A.M., food had been cold. - 10:01 A.M., I can't identify it, I won't eat it. - 10:01 A.M., Food dried out, cooked twice, not up to temperature. - 10:46 A.M., food taste was not good. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident's preferences for one of 20 residents (Resident 72) sampled. This failure had the potential for Resident 72 to experience poor meal intake and weight loss due to foods they do not like or tolerate. Findings: A review of Resident 72's admission Record indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). A record review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a nursing assessment tool that is used to develop a plan of care) dated 7/30/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven day period) score of 12 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 72 had minimal cognitive (pertaining to memory, judgement and reasoning ability)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices in dietary services were maintained according to standards of practice when: 1. Two individual sized cereal containers were found on the floor under the food shelves of the dry pantry storage. 2. One large food can item was dented. 3. Food boxes stored above the red line (18 inch) mark from the ceiling from fire sprinkler clearance. 4. Five food seasonings was previously used without an opened date. 5. One dish machine did not have a proper air gap system to adequately prevent backflow of contaminated fluids. 6. A red sanitation bucket was placed on top of a food production table. These failures had the potential to cause widespread food borne illness among all 86 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/29/24 at 8:38 A.M., an observation was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). Upon entry there were two shelves on the left of the dry storage food pantry with brown boxes on the top shelf and food items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not develop and implement resident specific care plans related to PTSD (PTSD-an anxiety disorder that comes from a traumatic event) and limited range of motion (ROM) for 2 of 18 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident 27 and Resident 294) Cross reference F688 and F699 As a result, Resident 27 did not receive care to address the decline in ROM in Resident 27's hands. In addition, Resident 294 had the potential to be retraumatized. Findings: 1.Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis (condition in which bones become weak and brittle) according to the facility's admission Record. During an initial tour of the facility on 10/29/24 at 9:40 A.M., an observation and interview of Resident 27 was conducted. Resident 27 was observed lying in bed in his room with a blanket. Resident 27 stated the facility staff Did not help me cut up my pancakes. Resident 27 stated he needed assistance cutting up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was revised and updated for one of five residents (Resident 15) reviewed for nutrition. As a result, the resident had the potential for further weight loss and health decline. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included protein-calorie malnutrition (not enough protein or calories eaten to meet nutritional needs). A review of Resident 15's Interdisciplinary (IDT) Note indicated Resident 15 had a significant, unplanned weight loss of 18.3 pounds in one month. On 10/31/24 at 2:59 P.M. an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD). The RD stated Resident 15's weight loss .was not an intentional weight loss .She had sudden significant weight loss .its not desirable, it means you are not meeting [Resident 15's] nutritional needs. The RD acknowledged that Resident 15's nutritional care plan was not updated to reflect the recent weight loss. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide interventions (care) according to the comprehensive care plan to prevent foot injury for one of 12 residents (Resident 42) reviewed with diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). As a result, Resident 42 was hospitalized with a left foot swelling (buildup of fluid in the tissues caused by the body's defense response to injury or infection) due to abrasions with the potential for diabetic foot complications. Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of diabetes and gangrene (death of body tissue due to a lack of blood flow or a serious bacterial infection) on the left second toe. A record review of Resident 42's MDS (Minimum data set: nursing facility assessment tool) dated 8/31/24 indicated that Resident 42 was rarely or unable to understand others or make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three resident's (Resident 86) pain medication order was clarified to include parameters (how much medication to give based on the residents stated pain level on a 0-10 scale) and frequency of administration. This failure had the potential for Resident 86 to have uncontrolled pain or to be over medicated. Findings: According to the admission record, Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post laminectomy (back surgery). During a record review of Resident 86's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Resident 86 had an order for Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 mg (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) give 1 tablet by mouth as needed for Twice daily as needed for pain management. 2x daily as needed for pain. Start date 10/24/2024 0900. During an interview on 11/1/2024 at 9:50 A.M., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated a pain medication order needed to have the medication name, dose, route, frequency, length,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care (care that involves recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of traumas) to one of six sampled residents (Resident 294). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 294 to experience re-traumatization that could lead to severe psychosocial harm and affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 294's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included PTSD (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing a terrifying event), depression, and alcohol use. A review of Resident 294's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 10/16/24 indicated Resident 294 had intact cognitive skills (the ability to think, remember, and reason). On 10/29/24 at 11:04 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 294. Resident 294 stated he was a military veteran and had been stationed in Iraq. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (medications with high abuse potential) reconciled with the medication administration record (MAR) for one of three residents (Resident 86). This failure had the potential for drug diversion (the transfer of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use). Findings: According to the admission record, Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 86's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Resident 86 had an order for: Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 mg (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for pain management Start Date 09/11/2024 0900 [9 A.M.] (D/C Date (ending date) 10/23/2024 2046 [8:46 P.M.]. This same order was then restarted on 10/23/2024 at 2100 [9 P.M.] and D/C [discontinued] date of 10/24/2024 0857 [8:57 A.M.] when it was replaced with the order Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 68) who received a psychotropic medication (a medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior) had accurate monitoring for use of the medication. As a result of inaccurate monitoring, there was a potential the facility would not be able to determine if the medicine was effective or if a gradual dose reduction was beneficial which put Resident 68 at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings: According to the admission record, Resident 68 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 68's admitting diagnosis was unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture routine healing (a break in the hip joint that did not require surgery to heal). Resident 68 had a diagnosis of dementia (a long term condition that causes a decrease in brain function) and a diagnosis of depression (a mental health condition that impacts how a person feels,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdoor facility garbage and refuse (recyclable and non-recyclable trash) was not overflowing and was secure with the dumpster's lids closed, for one of three facility dumpsters located outside the kitchen by the parking lots. This had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: On 10/29/24 at 9:30 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). Dietary Aide (DA) 2 was observed pushing a blue wheeled kitchen trash barrel with no lid outside the kitchen towards the facility's garbage and refuse area. The three blue facility dumpsters were located by the parking lot area outside of the kitchen. The first dumpster did not have one of the two lids securely closed and the third dumpster had several bags of trash overflowing to the top of the dumpster that prevented the lids to fully close and secured. The DS stated DA 2 should have had a lid on the kitchen trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 15) reviewed for weight loss had a completed Interdisciplinary Note and SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendations) Communication Form in the resident's electronic health record (EHR). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 15's condition not to be communicated to all healthcare providers. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included protein-calorie malnutrition and type 2 diabetes. On 10/29/24, a review of Resident 15's EHR was conducted. Resident 15's Interdisciplinary (IDT) Note indicated resident had an unplanned weight loss of 18.3 pounds in one month. The IDT note indicated an effective date of 10/4/24. The IDT note indicated Late Entry and was entered into Resident 15's chart on 10/29/24. On 10/31/24 at 2:41 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD). The RD stated Resident 15's weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assure the full understanding of an arbitration agreement was explained to three reviewed residents (Resident 68, Resident 72, and Resident 34) when: 1. Resident 68 entered into a legal agreement when they did not have the capacity to understand what they were signing. 2. Resident 72's family member who was not the responsible party (RP) or legal representative signed the agreement without explaining to Resident 72 what the agreement was about. 3. Resident 34 was not given a copy of the signed arbitration agreement and did not fully understand that they had 30 days from the date they signed to cancel the agreement. As a result, the residents (Resident 68, Resident 72 and Resident 34) entered into a legal agreement when they did not fully understand what they were signing and posed the risk for the residents to give up their judicial (judgments made in a court) rights for any medical malpractice. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 68's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA-facility group that monitors concerning trends in a facility) failed to identify areas of improvement and include in the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan (QAPI-plan developed by QAA to help improve conditions in the facility), complaints identified in resident council meetings and by surveyors during the recertification survey concerning food served to the residents. Cross reference F804 and F806 This failure resulted in unresolved issues affecting the residents' quality of life. Findings: On 11/1/24 at 4:20 P.M. an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) and a review of the QAPI program was conducted. The DON stated the issues discussed in the QAPI meetings were falls, diabetic care, inaccurate orders from the hospital, unsafe discharges, and weight loss. The DON stated the issues in the resident council meetings pertaining to food from the months of May, June, July, August, and September 2024 were not addressed in the QAPI meetings. The DON stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN) 11 provided care to a resident, Resident 65, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-stronger infection control requirements requiring gowns and masks in addition to gloves) without wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments). 2. Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 did not perform hand hygiene (the practice of cleaning hands to remove germs, dirt, or other harmful substances) consistently after removing her gloves. In addition, LN 4 wore bandages on both hands and fingertips which prevented her hands from being fully cleaned. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection among residents, staff, and visitors. FINDINGS: 1. During an observation on 11/1/2024, at 10:25 A.M. in the hallway outside of room A, CAN 11 was observed transferring (assisting a patient with movement) Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify a physician ' s order for a medication for one of two residents reviewed for plan of care (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the medication for 12 days, with the potential for blood clots or other complications. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft (a build-up of plaque in the arteries of the heart, which can cause blockage, or heart attack), per the facility admission Record. On 8/12/24 at 3:45 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). Per the DON, Resident 1 went out of the facility to many types of doctor appointments. The DON stated the process for communicating with the doctors was for the doctor to write any prescriptions or progress notes to send back from their office to the facility. The facility Licensed Nurse (LN) who received the orders should document the order in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide communication in the native language of one resident, Resident 1, in his native Arabic dialect when: 1. The facility had a policy for communication which was not implemented A review of the facility policy entitled Facility Services - Translation and/ or Interpretation dated 7/1/20 indicated, This facility's language access program will ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility.6. Competent oral translation of vital information that is not available in written translation, and non-vital information shall be provided in a timely manner and at no cost to the resident through the following means (as available to the facility): a. A staff member who is trained and competent in the skill of interpreting; b. A staff interpreter who is trained and competent in the skill of interpreting; c. Contracted interpreter service; d. Voluntary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control program when two staff members did not wear proper full personal protective equipment (PPE- consisted of gown, gloves, N-95 [highly particulate-filtering facepiece] mask, and face shield/goggles) while providing care to residents who were tested with COVID-19 (highly infectious disease), and one staff member failed to properly discard used N95 mask. These failures had the potential for contamination of supplies and spread of infection among staff and residents. Findings: On 4/4/24, the Department received a facility reported incident related to infection control. On 4/9/24, an unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted. During an observation on 4/9/24 at 9:26 A.M. in the east hall was conducted. There was a poster on the wall indicated, all staff should be wearing full PPE: gown, gloves, N-95 mask, a face shield or goggles while inside the residents' rooms. Outside the residents' room, there were PPE carts (cart which contained the PPE supplies for the staff to wear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with toileting, were provided assistance when requested and in a timely manner for six residents (Residents 39, 163, 162, 20, 10 and 8) and for six out of seven confidential residents (CR). This failure had the potential for residents to not have their toileting needs met and to experience a health decline or to lose the ability to control bowel and or bladder. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 39's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness (bleeding in or around the brain), fall from bed, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of Resident 39's MDS assessment (minimum data set, an assessment tool) dated 2/16/22, indicated the resident required extensive assistance from two or more staff for toileting. On 4/12/22 at 12:41 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 sampled resident's (Resident 13) Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POSLT- end of life medical care decisions) was consistent with other physician orders, and updated after a change of condition. This failure had the potential to cause confusion amongst the healthcare providers and may have resulted in end-of-life treatments that were against Resident 13's wishes. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the left breast and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 13's POLST, dated [DATE], the resident's end-of-life wishes included do not attempt resuscitation (DNR), selective treatment, and a trial period of artificial nutrition, including feeding tubes. A review of Resident 13's progress notes dated 2/1, 3/1, and [DATE], .Code Status: The patient states that in the event of experiencing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure written care plans were revised for two of 19 residents (Resident 18 and 26). This failure had the potential for residents' current care needs to not be accurately reflected in the written plan of care. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 18's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 18's written plan of care for risk of transmitting an infection dated 4/16/21, indicated, .Approaches droplet precautions [required masking, gown and gloves to enter the room] . On 4/12/22 at 10:51 A.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 18 inside the resident's room. Resident 18's room was not observed to be on any isolation precautions (requiring interventions to contain infectious organisms such as wearing personal protective equipment inside the room). A review of Resident 18's written plan of care for smoking dated 5/3/21 and revised on 1/6/22, indicated, . Approaches . The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 110) Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIVC- a catheter placed into a peripheral vein for venous access to administer intravenous therapy such as medication fluids) was dated in accordance to the facility's policy. As a result, Resident 110 was put at risk for infection. Findings: Resident 110 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dysphasia (deficiency in the generation of speech and comprehension due to brain disease or damage) following cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain). On 4/14/22 at 9:15 A.M., a concurrent observation of Resident 110's PIVC and interview with LN 11 was conducted. The saline lock (the part of the PIVC inserted through the skin and into a vein) was observed to have a transparent dressing over it. The transparent dressing appeared loosened where the saline lock exited from beneath the occlusive dressing. The dressing did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safe and/or effective pharmaceutical services procedures to meet the needs of a universe of 75 residents. This occurred when three of three expired medications were available for use. This failure had the potential for residents to receive ineffective or expired medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/12/22 at 10:15 A.M. of medication storage room located at the [NAME] Wing with licensed nurse (LN) 11, an opened Northera (medication used for dizziness and/or lightheadedness) bottle with manufacturer expiration date of 2/2022, vitamin d3 (a vitamin that helps the body with absorption of nutrients from food) bottle with manufacturer expiration date of 2/2022, and nicotine patches (a medication used to help people stop smoking cigarettes) manufacturer expiration date 1/2022. LN 11 acknowledged the medications and read the expiration dates. LN 11 stated all medications should be properly disposed of when they were expired. LN 11 explained that giving expired medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 27) was free from significant medication errors, when Resident 27's olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication used for psychosis; a condition that affects the way the brain processes the environment) was not administered in accordance with physician's orders for eight doses. This failure had the potential for Resident 27 to experience serious adverse health outcomes. Findings: Review of Resident 27 clinical record indicated that he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27 had multiple diagnosis, such as but not limited to, dementia (a disease which cause loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities), psychotic disorder (a condition that affects the way the brain processes the environment), and chronic kidney disease (a disease that affects the ability of kidneys to filter blood). During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure improperly labeled medications/biologicals were not available for use. This occurred when four of four medications were observed without open dates in accordance with current standards of practice, expiration dates when applicable, and/or resident identification tags in accordance with facility policy for a universe of 75 residents. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving ineffective or expired medications and had the potential of exposing residents to infections due to cross contamination. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/12/22 at 9:53 A.M. of medication storage room located at the East Wing with licensed nurse (LN) 11, an opened tuberculin (a medication that is used for diagnosis of tuberculosis - a highly contagious bacterial infection that primarily affects the lungs) vial without labeled beyond use date or date opened information in the medication refrigerator. LN 11 acknowledged the presence of the vial without any label to indicate when the vial should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 resident's (Resident 161) meal preferences (food likes/dislikes) were honored. This failure had the potential for Resident 161 to not eat food that she disliked which could contribute to inadequate food intake and possible weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 161's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 4/12/22 at 4:34 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 161. Resident 161 stated the facility frequently did not honor her food preferences. Resident 161 stated she did not like eggs, but would eat an egg if it was hard boiled. Resident 161 stated several times a week she was served scrambled eggs for breakfast. Resident 161 stated she made her dislike food known and had it recorded on her meal ticket for no eggs except a hard boiled egg. On 4/13/22 at 8:43 A.M., a joint observation, interview, and record review was conducted with Resident 161 inside the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one of three sampled residents on hospice (Resident 13). This failure had the potential to affect the coordination and continuity of care for Resident 13. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the left breast and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 13's medical record, the resident was referred to hospice on 3/18/22 and began hospice services on 3/30/22. During an interview with licensed nurse (LN 25) on 4/15/22 at 9: 02 A.M., LN 25 stated that when a resident received a hospice referral, a resident interdisciplinary team met for a care conference, which included the development of a new plan of care. During a concurrent interview and record review with LN 25 on 4/15/22 at 9:09 A.M., LN 25 stated Resident 13's record did not have a note regarding a care conference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-01 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an admission Comprehensive Assessment according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS-A clinical assessment tool), a Federal requirement by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one of 16 resident's (Resident 109) reviewed during a re-visit for Resident Assessments. This failure had the potential for Resident 109 not to be completely assessed for potential health issues and for CMS to be unaware of the resident current health status or location. Findings: According to the facility's admission Record, dated 11/14/24, Resident 109 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included falls and fractures left femur (left thigh). On 12/12/24 Resident 109's clinical record was reviewed: The admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the comprehensive assessment was, in progress. An interview and record review was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 12/12/24 at 3:44 P.M., of Resident 109's MDS admission comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,831 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,831 — penalty dated 2024-11-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MASTROCOLA, LOIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 9% | since 02/01/1998 |
| OLDS, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 78% | since 02/01/1998 |
| BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 09/20/2023 |
| LIFE GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/1998 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.