No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pearl Of Elk Grove, The

1920 Nerge Road, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 · For profit - Corporation · 190 certified beds · (847) 301-0550 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$144,133 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jun 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $144,133 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
800 Biesterfield Rd Ste 106 · (847) 981-8866 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
641 Meacham Rd · (847) 352-4061 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi<0.1 mi
905 Meacham Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1414 Armstrong Ln · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
777 Meacham Rd · (847) 985-6446

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.4%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.7%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.7%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.0%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine49.2%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.762.221.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 332 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 49.5–62.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 8.4–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.2–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
47.3%
Total nursing turnover
27.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 156.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to conduct a thorough investigation of a sexual abuse allegation. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy when V3 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to V1 (Administrator) that she observed R2 exposing his genitals to R1 and attempting to insert his penis into R1's mouth. The facility unsubstantiated sexual abuse without interviewing all possible witnesses. The immediate jeopardy began on September 10, 2024 when the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on September 24, 2024 at 11:44 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on September 25, 2024 at 1:48 PM, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. This failure has the potential to affect all 148…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident with known sexual behaviors and public displays of affection. This failure resulted in R2, a [AGE] year old male resident exposing his genitals to R1, a [AGE] year old female resident and attempting to insert his penis into R1's mouth. R1 has severe cognitive impairment and is unable to consent to sexual relations. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy when the facility lacked interventions and processes to protect female residents from a resident with known sexual behaviors. The immediate jeopardy began on August 6, 2024 when R2 was moved from a secure Dementia Unit after allegedly kissing and hugging R3. R2's new room was located directly next to R1. No interventions were put in place to ensure other female residents were protected from R2 after moving R2's room. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on September 24, 2024 at 11:44 AM. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's (R4) right to be free from sexual abuse by a facility staff member. This failure resulted in R4 experiencing psycho-social harm from V13's (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) inappropriate sexual touching. The facility also failed to protect a resident's (R2) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R1). This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R2 and R4) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. On 6/03/2025 at 10:00 AM, R4 said V13 (CNA) had sexually touched her private vaginal area with his gloved hand and fingers when rendering incontinence care on the early morning of 6/01/2025. R4 said she told V13 to stop touching her because he was causing her pain in her private area. R4 said V13 would take approximately thirty minutes when providing her incontinence care, which was unusual for her. R4 said V13 had done this to her three times prior when rendering incontinence care. R4 said the prior incidents had occurred in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and report the side effects of a resident's anti-psychotic medication. This failure resulted in R4 continuing to receive Seroquel and experiencing a hospitalization, increased falls, and inability to participate in his rehab care. This applies to 1 out of 3 (R4) residents reviewed for psychotropics. The findings include: R4's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including a history of falls, metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, depression, epilepsy, convulsions, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, urinary tract infections, and left femur fracture. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/18/2024 showed he was severely cognitively impaired and receiving high-risk medications including antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants. R4's EMR showed he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two staff assisted a dependent resident while providing incontinent care. This failure resulted in R2 falling from the bed to the floor, sustaining a left eye laceration along her hairline. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for falls and accidents in a sample of 9. Findings include: V3's (Registered Nurse) witness statement dated 06/23/2024 showed R2 falling on the floor while V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing incontinent care. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed R2 was dependent on most of the activities of daily living, including toileting, hygiene, and rolling left to right, and required two or more assistance to provide incontinent care. The hospital emergency physician progress notes on 06/23/2024 showed R2 fell out of bed with multiple lacerations to the head; CT (Computed Tomography) of the head revealed subdural hematoma, and R2 was admitted for further management to ICU (Intensive Care Unit) V4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight, assess the resident's nutritional status, and assist the resident with eating to prevent significant weight loss. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a weight loss of 11.5% in one month. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R11) reviewed for nutrition. The finding includes: R11's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed an admission date of 3/15/2024 with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, facial weakness, pneumonia, acute kidney failure, dysphagia, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, assistance with personal care, pressure ulcer, delirium, dementia, and depression. R11's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/15/2024 showed R11 was cognitively impaired and required moderate assistance with eating. On 6/12/2024 at 12:34 PM, R11 was in bed sleeping, he appeared thin with dry skin. Then at 1:40 PM R11 was awake and said he was hungry. R11 started to fidget and lean on his right side trying to reach for a cup of water on his bedside table. V27 (Registered Nurse/RN) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-06-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility consistently failed to serve food items on their facility planned and approved menu to ensure adequate nutritional intake. This failure resulted in weight loss for R3 and R20 due to insufficient calories, prolonged feelings of sadness, anger, frustration, and low self-worth for R1, R2, R4, R13, and R18, and financial hardship to the residents and families of R1, R3, R13, and R21 who brought in food to supplement their food intake. This applies to 19 of 19 residents (R1-R4, R6-R14, R16-R21) reviewed for menus served as planned in a sample of 22. The findings include: Facility Week At A Glance menu, dated 6/2/24 to 6/8/24 and distributed to facility residents, shows the following menu items were planned to be served at the facility: Sunday, 6/2/24 Breakfast: Juice of choice, milk of choice, coffee/tea, hot/cold cereal, pancakes with margarine/syrup, scrambled eggs Lunch: Hot dog on a bun, onion rings, potato salad, lemon cake, milk, beverage Dinner:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility consistently failed to provide palatable, appetizing meals to residents. This failure resulted in weight loss for R3 and R20 due to insufficient calories, prolonged feelings of sadness, anger, frustration, and low self-worth for R1, R2, R4, R13, and R18, and financial hardship to the residents and families of R1, R3, R13, and R21 who bought food to supplement their food intake. This applies to 12 of 12 residents (R1-R4, R6, R9, R13, R14-R15, R18, R20 and R21) reviewed for food palatability a sample of 22. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated 6/5/24, shows R3's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type 1 diabetes, deficiency of Vitamin K, and depression. POS (Physician Order Sheet), dated 6/5/24, shows R3's diet order included carbohydrate controlled, renal, low concentrated sweets, low potassium. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/25/24, shows R3 was cognitively intact. Nutrition progress note, dated 1/22/24, shows R3's weight after dialysis was 174 pounds and R3's appetite varies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This resulted in R1's left pinky finger being pulled backwards during care and x-ray showed a non-displaced fracture of the left finger. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, macular degeneration, atrial fibrillation and non-displaced fracture of distal phalanx of left little finger. R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] show she is cognitively intact, has no behaviors, rejections of care, or delusions. She requires partial moderate assist with showers/bathing. The facility's Initial Report dated 3/19/24 documents R1 verbalized today, on Saturday March 16, 2024, that CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided her a shower and was not gentle to her. R1's statement dated 3/19/24 documented by V3 states, On Saturday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed heights were at the lowest level and failed to provide two staff assist to prevent injuries. As a result, R1 and R3 sustained left and right hip fractures, respectively, and were admitted to the hospital. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of 14. Findings include: 1. R1's progress notes showed R1 had two falls on 03/23/2023 and one on 03/24/2023 and 03/30/2023. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed R1 was dependent on her daily living activities and required two or more assistance for daily living care activities. The universal fall precaution in part showed Place the hospital bed in a low position when a patient (Resident) is resting in bed. On 12/14/2023 at 09:32, V9 (R1's Physician) said he had known R1 for a long time and her health conditions were deteriorating. V9 said R1 was bedbound and required two assists. On 12/14/2023 at 09:55 AM, V19 (Director of Rehab Therapy) said R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Medication Storage Policy by failing to ensure medications are secured and by failing to ensure medications are labeled. This failure has the capacity to affect 20 residents reviewed for medications in a total sample of 31 and 1 cart of 7 reviewed for medication storage.Findings include: 1.On 12-17-25 at 4:56 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) left the medication cart unlocked and unattended while passing R45's medication. At 5:15 AM, V3 left the medication cart unlocked and unattended while passing R12's medication. At 5:18 AM, V3 left the medication cart unlocked and unattended while passing R137's medication. On 12-17-25 at 5:34 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) said the nurse is responsible for securing medication storage by locking the cart while passing medications. V3 said this prevent people from taking medications from the medication cart. On 12-18-25 at 3:49 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said all medication should be locked in medication cart to ensure only nurses have access to the medications. Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Acute Respiratory Infection Policy when V3 (Registered Nurse) failed to wear a mask during a facility wide COVID outbreak and the facility failed to follow the Enhanced Barrier Precaution Policy when V3 was not wearing a gown when applying pain patch (direct physical contact) on a resident with Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This failure has the capacity to affect 4 residents in a total sample of 31.Findings include:On 12-16-25 at 9:00 AM, while entering the facility, front desk receptionist informed the survey team about facility outbreak of COVID and advised the survey team to wear a mask. Surveyor observed masks and hand sanitizer station in the lobby. Surveyor observed most staff and all visitors wearing masks and sanitizing their hands appropriately. V2 also told survey team about COVID outbreak status.On 12-17-25 at 4:56 AM, V3 was observed passing medications to R45 without wearing a mask. At 5:15 AM, V3 was observed passing medications to R12 without a mask. At 5:18 AM, V3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Call Light Policy by not ensuring the call light was placed within easy reach of a resident. This deficient practice affected one resident (R83) out of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, within a total sample of 31 residents.R83 is a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R83's medical diagnoses include, but not limited to Secondary parkinsonism, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, bipolar, hypertension, gout, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism. On 12/16/2025 at 9:54 AM during room rounds, R83 was observed in bed awake and resting. R83's call light string was noted on top of the bedside table and not within R83's reach. V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) entered the room and was asked why R83's call light was positioned out of her reach; the CNA stated, It's because she always plays with the call light. When the CNA was asked how R83 could request assistance if the call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the Fall Prevention and Management Policy by not completing post fall assessment dated [DATE] after a fall incident. This failure affected 1 resident (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a total sample of 31.Findings include:On 12-17-25 at 12:49 PM, V14 (Restorative Nurse) said R3's Fall Event dated 3-16-25 documents In Progress and nothing is entered. V14 said this event occurred before V14 was the Restorative Nurse. V14 said she does not have knowledge of this incident. V14 said the nurse on duty is responsible for completing the Fall Event form.On 12-18-25 at 10:46 Am, V2 (Director of Nursing) said the nurse on duty was an agency nurse who didn't complete the Fall Event form and did not enter any new interventions. V2 said the fall team completed a soft copy Fall Event form however did not enter the form in computer because she was not the nurse on duty at that time. V2 said the team decided to continue the current interventions however…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate the Level II PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process for residents identified with mental illness. This deficient practice affected 3 residents (R133, R12, and R9) reviewed for PASRR within a total sample of 31 residents. 1 -R9 is a [AGE] year-old female, admission record documents initial admission date to the facility was on 6/19/2019 with diagnosis of, not limited to, Dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, onset date 10/01/2022. Major depressive disorder single episode unspecified, onset date 7/22/2020. Unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known psychological condition, onset date 7/29/2020. Personal history of other mental behavioral disorders, onset date 10/01/2020. Depression unspecified, onset date 5/20/2024. R9's OBRA I- Initial Screening dated: 6/26/2019, reads: based upon all information and data available to me for this person there is a reasonable basis for suspecting DD or MI,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and Level II screenings for 1 (R31) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR screening in the sample of 31. R31 is a [AGE] year-old-male, admission record documents initial admission date 9/5/2025, with diagnosis of, not limited to anxiety disorder onset date 5/4/2020, bipolar disorder 1/27/2020, major depressive disorder recurrent moderate onset date 3/7/2018, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition onset date 8/18/2013, unspecified dementia onset date 10/15/2010.On 12/18/2025 at 10:18AM, V7 (Social Service Coordinator) and V8 (Social Service Director) stated there was no Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) completed for R31 prior to admission. Review of Notice of PASRR Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level I screen Outcome, Notice Date: December 17, 2025PASRR Level I Determination: No Level II Required- No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure common areas are free of accident hazards for one of three residents (R42) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 31. Findings include:On 12/16/2025 at 10:02AM during unit rounds, R42 was lying on bed with discoloration on left eyebrow area. R42 stated that R42 fell on [DATE] in the lounge area within the unit. R42 got up on his wheelchair, went with surveyor to the lounge area and showed the surveyor how he fell. R42 stated that R42 stood up from wheelchair to transfer to the regular chair by holding on the table in the middle of the room but the table was wobbly so R42 fell on his left side. R42 touched the table and the table was wobbling. R42 stated that the table was wobblier when R42 fell. On 12/16/2025 at 10:52AM during observation with V12 (Registered Nurse), V12 touched the table in the lounge area and was wobbling. On 12/16/2025 at 10:52AM during interview with V12, V12 stated that the wobbling table is not safe for anyone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents who needed help with toileting, grooming, eating, and transfers.This applies to 5 out of 5 residents (R1, R2, R6, R7, and R8) reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include:1. On 7/29/2025 at 9:30 AM, R1 was in bed. R1 said he required staff assistance with his toileting hygiene because he was incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R1 said he filed a grievance concern on 7/25/2025 because he was not assisted with his request for incontinence care. R1 said he then developed skin irritation on his scrotal area and was uncomfortable. At 9:50 AM, V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) assessed R1's catheter and scrotal area. R1's catheter tubing had soiled residue present, was not secured properly and the catheter's port was directly rubbing on his right inner thigh area. R1 also had a gauze dressing on his scrotal area. V4 removed the dressing, and R1 had soiled dry residue and skin irritation on the area. V4 applied a new gauze dressing to R1's scrotal area without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and immediately report an allegation of abuse to the abuse coordinator. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and right below the knee amputation. On May 7, 2025, at 12:16 PM, V4 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) said he was providing incontinence care to R1 on May 6, 2025. V4 said R1 told V4 during the previous shift, when V3 (CNA) was providing care to R1, V3 (CNA) told R1 to shut up multiple times. V4 said he told R1 to report this to his sister or a manager because it was verbal abuse, and staff should not talk to residents that way. V4 said he did not report the allegation to anyone because he doesn't know V3 and didn't know if V3 would do something to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were given at the correct time for 12 of 13 residents (R1, R2, R4-R13) reviewed for medications in the sample of 14. The findings include: 1. On 3/27/25 at 10:20 AM, V4 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) gave R4 the following medications: escitalopram, ezetimibe, ferrous sulfate, loratadine, potassium chloride, senna-s, vitamin D3, Coreg, Eliquis, levetiracetam, and sodium bicarbonate. R4's March 2025 MAR (Medication Administration Record) showed these medications were scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM. R4's Face Sheet dated 3/27/25 showed diagnoses including left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, long term use of anticoagulants, hyperlipidemia, unspecified convulsions, depression, hypokalemia, chronic kidney disease, dysarthria and anarthria. On 3/27/25 at 10:52 AM, V4 LPN gave R5 the following medications: loratadine, senna plus, and sodium chloride. R5's March 2025 MAR showed these medications were scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was maintained to ensure residents were able to get out of bed for 4 of 4 residents (R1,R2,R3,R6) reviewed for full body mechanical sling lifts in the sample of 4. The findings include: On 01/15/2025 at 9:10AM, the #2 full body mechanical sling lift inspection sticker showed inspection was performed October 2024 and is due for re-inspection January 2025. On the lift arm that supported the resident there was exposed wires and what looked like part of a broken cover. At 9:30AM, there was a sign on lift #2 that showed, OUT of ORDER. The #8 full body mechanical sling lift inspection sticker showed, Preventative Maintenance 05/31/19. On 01/15/2025 at 9:20AM, V3 Maintenance said, I have not received any reports from the Nursing Staff on the need for mechanical lift maintenance or repair. There is a portal in our computer system that generates a workorder, that would be the proper way to request maintenance. Usually staff just call me, leave a voice mail, email, or report directly to me,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to resolve resident grievances for 5 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5 R6) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 6. The findings include: On 12/17/24 at 9:55 AM, R1 stated he has seen R2 standing at the lunch time steam cart in the hall. R1 said R2 continually touches the trays and removes plate lids with his bare hands. R1 said it is unsanitary and spreads germs. R1 said it has been discussed at group meetings when staff members are present. Nothing is being done about it. On 12/17/24 at 12:37 PM, R4 stated she has seen R2 pick food off resident trays and hovers over the steam carts to find his tray. R4 said she has seen R2 pick food off used trays and then touch fresh food trays. R4 said R2 touches the warming covers with his dirty hands. R4 said it was discussed at the last food focus meeting and staff know about the issue. R4 said no one is doing anything about it. On 12/17/24 at 11:21 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) said R2 does touch the food trays at mealtimes. R2 is alert and has OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder). Timing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient amount of nursing staff/providers to notify family of change in condition, provide grooming needs, and distribute meals in a timely manner. This applies to 7 of 11 residents (R2-R8) reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: 1.R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) showed R3's diagnoses include paraplegia, congenital hydrocephalus, heart failure, and palliative care. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R3 was cognitively moderately impaired and dependent on one to two staff assistants for daily care activities. During the observation on 11/02/2024 at 1:35 PM, R3 was in bed sleeping with noisy breathing, and the meal tray was by his bedside untouched. V15 (Agency- Certified Nursing Assistant) said he didn't know about R3. Since morning, he has had noisy breathing and didn't even eat breakfast. V15 said V6(Agency Registered Nurse) is aware of R3's condition. Around 1:45 PM, R6 said he had been having the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the family, physician, and hospice provider in a timely manner about the change of conditions for a resident. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R3) who was reviewed for significant change in condition in a sample of 12. Findings include: During the observation on 11/02/2024 at 1:35 PM, R3 was in bed sleeping with noisy breathing, and the meal tray was by his bedside untouched. V15 (Agency- -Certified Nursing Assistant) said he is from the agency and does not know about R3. V15 said that since morning, he has had noisy breathing sounds and hasn't even eaten breakfast. V15 said that V6(Agency Registered Nurse) knows R3's condition. Around 1:45 PM, R6 said they did not feed him to avoid R3 from aspirating on food. When the writer asked R6 whether the family and provider knew about the change in conditions of R3, V6 said she did not get a chance and would notify them soon. On 11/04/2024 at 10:54 AM, V18 (R3's family member) said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for residents' dependent on staff. This applies to 3 of 8 residents (R2, R4, and R8) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in a sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R2's EMR showed R2's diagnoses include morbid obesity, acute kidney failure, h/o fracture, osteoarthritis, bipolar, anxiety, and mood disorder. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that R2 was cognitively intact and required one to two extensive assists for most of his daily activities. R2 had quarter inch-long right-hand fingers with blackish dirt under the nails and said that only once the staff cut his nails and they don't care. 2. On 11/02/2024 at noon, observed R4 with about an inch-long nails on both hands, with sharp edges and brownish dirt under the nails. R4 said no one cuts her nails. R4's EMR showed R4 had diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease, acute kidney disease, palliative care, dementia, and cerebrovascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R5-R7) reviewed for meal service. Finding includes: Observation of the lunch meal on 11/02/2024 between 12:10 PM and 1:15 PM at the 100 halls, where the residents were served meals to rooms. A random temperature check of R5, R6, and R7 trays showed that sweet potatoes and beans delivered to residents were below 100 degrees Fahrenheit. On 11/04/2024 at 1:15 PM, V3 (Food Service Director) said the temperature of the meal tray should not be going below 135 degrees Fahrenheit. V3 said she addressed the concerns about cold food due to staff distributing it on time with management several times before the new administrator started, and it continues to be a problem. On 11/02/2024, between 12:15 PM and 1:00 PM, V5(Cook) recorded the temperature of random residents' meal trays and said that during lunchtime meal trays are sent with hot plates, but they sit on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement a fluid restriction for a resident with congestive heart failure (CHF) and failed to do daily weights for residents with CHF. This applies to 3 of 29 residents (R6, R13, and R82) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R6's Face Sheet printed on 10/22/24 showed R6 had a diagnosis of CHF. R6's Order Summary report showed an order for a fluid restriction of 2-2.5 liters per day. The order had a start date of 10/10/24. On 10/22/24 at 10:27 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R6 was on a fluid restriction for CHF. On 10/22/24 at 11:15 AM, R6 said she was not aware if she was on a fluid restriction. On 10/21/24 at 12:18 PM, on R6's bedside table was a large disposable foam cup, two plastic cups, a dietary supplement drink (in its original container), and a container of milk. The large disposable foam cup appeared to be full. One plastic cup was half full. The other plastic cup was three quarters full. The dietary supplement drink appeared full. The container of milk was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's arm was supported by a sling during a transfer and while up in the wheelchair for 1 of 6 residents (R105) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 10/21/24 at 10:30 AM , R105 was in bed. R105's left arm was resting on her stomach. R105 said she had a stroke and was unable to move her left arm or hand. There was a sign on the wall above R105's bed that read Must wear sling when being transported. At 10:32 AM, V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V16 (Occupational Therapy) came into the room and provided incontinence care. V15 and V16 then rolled R105 from side to side to place a mechanical lift sling underneath her. R105 held her left wrist with her right hand while being rolled. V15 and V16 connected the mechanical lift sling the the lift machine and began raising R105 in the air. V16 told R105 to hold her arm. R105 was transferred via the mechanical lift to her wheelchair. R105 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was cued/followed safe swallowing strategies, failed to transfer a resident in a safe manner, and failed to have a fall intervention in place for a resident at risk for falling. This applies to 3 of 29 residents (R3, R73, and R92) reviewed for safety in the sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R3's Face Sheet printed on 10/21/24 showed R3 was diagnosed with adult failure to thrive and dysphagia. On 10/21/24 at 1:10 PM, R3 was eating in her room with no staff present. R3 fed herself three consecutive spoonfuls of mechanical soft chicken. The spoonfuls appeared full with food falling off of the spoon as R3 moved the spoon towards her mouth. R3 did not alternate between food/solids and liquids. On 10/21/24 at 1:18 PM, R3 said she was done eating. Food was falling out of R3's mouth as she was talking. R3 had a cup of water and juice sitting on the meal tray. The cups…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety (psychotropic) medications had a duration/end date for 4 of 8 residents (R66, R40, R299, R106) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 29. 1. R66's Order Summary Report dated 10/22/24 shows an active order for Lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 2mg (milligram)/mL (milliliter) give 0.5mL by mouth every 2 hours as needed for severe anxiety/nausea started on 5/31/24 with no duration listed. On 10/23/24 at 11:04 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said PRN (as needed) antipsychotic and psychotropic medications should have a stop date or duration. 2. R40's Physician Orders for October 2024 shows an order dated 9/19/24 for Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5mg tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for restlessness related to anxiety disorder. There is no stop date listed for this order. 3. R299's Order Summary Report printed on 10/22/24 showed an order for Lorazepam (anti-anxiety psychotropic medication) to be given every 2 hours as needed starting on 10/20/24. There was no stop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired medications in the medication refrigerator for 2 of 29 residents (R120, R89) reviewed for medications in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 10/23/24 at 10:17 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist) with this surveyor reviewed the medication room refrigerator. The refrigerator contained R120's used insulin pen with an opened date of 9/3/24 and an expiration date of 10/1/24 (22 days ago). The same refrigerator contained a bottle of liquid medicated mouthwash for R89 with an opened date of 7/12/24 written on the pharmacy sticker. The same pharmacy sticker shows discard after 14 days. V7 said those medications should have been thrown away since they are expired and she will dispose of them. The facility's Storage of Medications Policy dated 10/17/24 shows All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility,regardless of amount remaining.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gowns when providing direct patient care to 1 of 29 residents (R73) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the sample of 29 reviewed for infection control. The findings include: On 10/21/24 at 9:51 AM, V18, (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), changed R73's shirt and adjusted his neck pillow, wiped saliva from his mouth, and adjusted him in his wheelchair. V18 was not wearing a gown when providing R73's care. R73's room had PPE (personal protective equipment) in a container outside of his room and a sign on his door showing he is on EBP. On 10/22/24 at 1:40 PM, V7, (Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist), said the staff is expected to wear a gown and gloves when providing high contact care (transferring, repositioning, toileting) a resident on EBP. R73's admission Record dated 10/22/24 shows R73 is a [AGE] year-old man, and his diagnoses include, but are not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan when a resident exhibited sexual behaviors and public displays of affection and required a room change. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for resident-to-resident sexual assault in the sample of 5. The findings include: On September 18, 2024 at 1:39 PM, and on September 23, 2024 at 2:09 PM, V3 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said on September 10, 2024 she was walking up and down the corridor, picking up dinner trays. V3 noticed R2 was out of his room. V3 said she approached R1's room and the privacy curtain was closed. V3 said she was surprised by this because the staff never leave R1's privacy curtain closed when they are not in the room because R1 is a high fall risk and requires frequent observation. V3 said she went to pull the privacy curtain back and found R2 standing at R1's bedside with one knee on R1's bed. R2's khaki shorts and belt were down around R2's ankles. V3 could see R2's bare buttocks. V3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by their attending physician as shown in the facility's policy. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for physician visits in the sample of 5. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2 has multiple diagnoses including, Parkinson's Disease, dementia with behaviors, anxiety, falls, psychotic disorder with delusions, insomnia, and depression. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 24, 2024 shows R2 is cognitively intact, requires setup assistance with eating, supervision with oral hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers between surfaces, substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, showers, and lower body dressing, and is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The EMR shows V8 (Physician) is R2's primary care physician. On May 23, 2024 at 12:30 PM, V8 (Physician) documented the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered a medication that was not prescribed for them, and failed to notify the Director of Nursing, or a nurse manager, regarding a medication error in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication error in the sample of 8. The findings include: R1's admission Record, printed by the facility on 8/15/24, showed she had diagnoses including Charcot's Joint, left ankle and foot, Covid-19, Type II diabetes mellitus, Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus infection (MRSA), and displaced comminuted fractures of shafts of left fibula and left tibia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she is cognitively intact. R1's care plan initiated on 5/14/24 showed she is on diuretic therapy related to hypertensive heart disease. The care plan showed R1 was on Lasix and hydralazine. The care plan also showed that many other medications may interact with antihypertensive medications to potentiate their effect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-10 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted to return to the facility following a behavioral hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for involuntary discharge in the sample of 3. The findings include: R2's electronic medical record accessed on 8/9/24 show R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's diagnoses include Alzheimer disease, schizoaffective disorder, diabetes and cognitive communication deficits. R2's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R2 has moderately impaired cognition. R2's progress notes dated 7/15/24 show R2 was sent out to the emergency room due to aggressive behaviors towards staff via involuntary petition. Daughter was informed A progress notes dated 7/16/24 show R2 was transferred to a behavioral health (in Indiana) A progress noted dated 7/23/24 by V7 (Social Services) show V8 (R2's daughter) reports that the hospital behavioral health is ready to discharge R2. Writer advised daughter to contact social worker at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident who is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 4. The findings include: R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R1 has no cognitive impairment. The same assessment show R1 is dependent on staff for toileting and R1 is always incontinent for bladder functions. On 8/9/24 at 9:45 AM, R1 was in bed alert and pleasant R1 said, an agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was assigned to him on day shift last 8/2/24 and 8/3/24. R2 1 said he did not get changed. R1 said last 7/31/24 on PM shift, he again had an agency CNA and he waited long to be changed. R1 said he had to sit on a wet diaper. R1 said he has some redness on his bottom that is why he wanted to be changed sooner. R1 said he already reported his concerns to V2 (Director of Nursing-DON.) that he did not get the care he needed on those three days. On 8/9/24 at 10:10 AM, V2 (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed accurately for a resident who fell and hit her head, and failed to complete post-fall documentation and include it in the resident's medical record. This applies to 1 out of 5 (R1) residents reviewed for falls. The finding includes: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed an admission date of 6/03/2024 with diagnoses including cerebral ischemia, refractory anemia, malignant neoplasm of left breast, secondary neoplasm of the bone marrow, antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced pancytopenia, slurred speech, and weakness. R1's admission Minimum Data Set showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired. R1's admission Fall Assessment risk form dated 6/03/2024 showed R1 was at low risk for falls. On 6/07/2024 at 1:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R1 had an unwitnessed fall on 6/04/2024 around 10 PM. V2 said the facility staff notified her after the incident and reported R1 was observed on the floor in her room trying to reach for something. V2 said R1 had sustained a small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were documented and timely resolutions were provided. This applies to all 151 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Daily Census, dated 6/2/24, shows the facility census was 151 residents. 1. On 6/3/24 at 2:00 PM, R2 stated he was the Resident Council President and he canceled the resident council meeting last week because he did not want to participate in another meeting listening to the same complaints from residents, the facility promising to address the problems and then doing nothing. R2 stated the issues of poor quality of food, residents not receiving what they ordered, palatability, the food service not serving the planned menus, the hot food being served cold came up frequently at resident council meetings. R2 stated the complaints of food service were so numerous the facility decided to have a separate food council to discuss the concerns. R2 stated he was tired of discussing the concerns with administration including poor quality food services, lack of activities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to residents who required staff assistance with toileting hygiene. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, and R13) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in a sample of 22. The findings include: 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/8/24, shows R1 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 6/3/24 at 2:32 PM with V9 (LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse), and V2 (Director of Nursing) in the library, R1 was sitting in his wheelchair smelled of very strong urine and his red shorts were soaked in urine. V2 and V9 observed R1's urine-soaked shorts and stated R1 should be checked and changed every 2 hours. R1 stated his incontinence brief had not been checked/changed since approximately 9:30 AM that morning. R1 stated he can not feel that he urinates in his brief unless he has a very large rush of urine. R1 stated he never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were reordered in a timely fashion to be available for medication administration. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for medications in the sample of 22. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS(Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/8/24, shows R1 was cognitively intact. MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 6/2024, shows R1 had physician orders for the following eye medications: 1. Refresh Lacri-Lube Ophthalmic Ointment instill 1 application in both eyes every 8 yours as needed for dry eyes (3/2/24) 2. Refresh Tears Solution instill 1 drop in both eyes every 4 hours as needed for dry eyes (3/13/24) 3. Systane Balance Ophthalmic Solution 0.6% instill 2 drops in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes. (3/29/24) On 6/3/24 during initial tour of the facility, R1 stated he brought eye drops from his eye physician office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store resident diabetic medication resulting in a delay of the medication administration. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for medications in a sample of 22. The findings include: Face sheet, dated 6/4/24, shows R5's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and humerus fracture. MAR (Medication Administration Record) report, dated 4/2024, shows R5 had a physician order (dated 4/9/24) for Ozempic (2mg (milligrams)/dose) once a day every Tuesday for diabetes. The MAR report shows R5 received her scheduled Ozempic dose on 4/30/24. On 6/3/24 during initial tour of the facility, R5 stated the facility lost the Ozempic pen she personally bought and provided to a nurse at the facility. R5 stated she received one of the four doses from the pen at the facility and when the next dose was due the pen was missing. R5 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that state survey results were available to residents and visitors. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for accessing survey results in the sample of 14. On 12/12/2023 at 1:16PM, V11(R1's family) said he asked for survey results after he had some concerns about R1's care, and the last survey result available to review was dated 12/12/2022. On 12/12/2023 at 1:45PM, R3 and V12 (R3's family) said he was not aware of the availability of the survey reports. A review of the list of surveys for the facility showed the Department of Health initiated an annual survey on 09/12/2023 and complaints surveys on 01/24/2023, 02/03/2023, 03/16/2023, 04/11/2023, 05/03/2023, 05/30/2023, 06/01/2023, 06/05/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/27/2023, 07/14/2023, 09/29/2023,10/20/2023, and 11/29/2023. On 11/12/2023 at 3:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) indicated she updated the survey binder with the 2023 survey result after V11 (R1's family) called her and asked for it. V1 said she was responsible for ensuring results were posted/updated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide toileting, bathing/showering and transfer help to residents who required staff assistance for ADLs. (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 10 of 12 residents (R1-R3 and R6-R12) reviewed for ADL assistance in a sample of 12. The findings include: 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/25/23, shows R1 required modified independence for cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS shows R1 required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and personal hygiene, was totally dependent on staff for transfers and bathing, and was always incontinent of bowel. MDS, dated [DATE], shows R2 was cognitively intact, was totally dependent on staff for toileting, bathing/showering, and transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. On 11/9/23 at 1:30 PM, R1 and R2 were in their room lying in their beds. R1 stated he had only had two showers during the month of 11/2023. R1 stated he and R2 were told by staff that there were not enough people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to assist residents who require help to perform ADLs. (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 10 of 12 residents (R1-R3 and R6-R12) reviewed for ADL assistance in a sample of 12. The findings include: 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/25/23, shows R1 required modified independence for cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS shows R1 required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and personal hygiene, was totally dependent on staff for transfers and bathing, and was always incontinent of bowel. MDS, dated [DATE], shows R2 was cognitively intact, was totally dependent on staff for toileting, bathing/showering, and transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. On 11/9/23 at 1:30 PM, R1 and R2 were in their room lying in their beds. R1 stated he had only had two showers during the month of 10/2023 and they were told by staff that there were not enough staff to give showers. R1 and R2 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attend to call lights in a timely manner as per facility policy. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R1-R3, R8) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 10. The findings include: Facility Resident Council meeting minutes for July, August and September 2023 recorded resident concerns with call light response. R8 was the President of the Resident Council. 1.R8's diagnoses on face sheet included MS (Multiple Sclerosis), spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, paraplegia, unspecified, functional quadriplegia, central pain syndrome, personal history of urinary (tract) infections. R8's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated 9/13/23 showed that R8 was cognitively intact and required extensive 2 person assist for transfer and toilet use. On 9/29/23 at 9:44 AM, R8 verified the residents concerns about call light response voiced at the Resident Council. R8 stated The aides from the agency turn the call lights off and disappear. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with nail care and shaving/trimming facial hair. This applies to 5 of 32 residents (R43, R52, R54, R106, R99) reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) in a sample of 32. The findings include: 1. On 9/12/23 at 10:32 AM, R52 was lying in bed talking about random topics that did not make sense. R52 was very confused and was unable to be interviewed. R52's fingernails were long and yellow with an accumulation of a black substance. R52's face sheet documents the following diagnoses: spinal stenosis, lumbosacral region, need for assistance with personal care, other signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, unspecified osteoarthritis, and idiopathic chronic gout, unspecified shoulder without tophus. R52's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/20/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) summary score of 2, which means he is severely cognitively impaired. For personal hygiene, he was assessed as 3/2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. On 9/12/23 at 10:29 AM, R34 was lying in bed and eating her breakfast. Next to her tray was a medication cup with 7 oral pills. Surveyor asked R34 who gave her these medications. R34 replied, The girl outside gave it to me in the morning. It was like 15 minutes ago. On 9/12/23 at 10:32 AM, V14 (RN-Registered Nurse) stated, Yes, I am (R34's) nurse this morning. I brought (R34's medications) to her, but she said she would be nauseated if she didn't take it after breakfast. So, I left it there because I thought she would take it after breakfast. It's still there? Review of R34's EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record shows the following medications were in R34's medication cup: Sertraline HCL Oral tablet 50 MG (Milligrams), Theragran-M Oral Tablet (Multivitamins with minerals), Vitamin C 500 MG, Vitamin D3 25 MCG (Micrograms), Apixaban 5 MG, Glimepiride 2 MG, and Metformin HCL 1000 MG. 5. On 9/12/23 at 11:10 AM, R23 was not in her room. On top of her end table, there was 2.5 OZ (Ounces) antifungal powder (Miconzale Nitrate 2%) and 5 OZ Inzo antifungal cream (Miconzaole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene while administering medications, while providing incontinence care, before putting on gloves and removing gloves, failed to properly sanitize a glucometer, failed to provide a resident with a clean, unused mechanical lift sling, failed to empty and store a resident's urinal, and failed to properly dispose of biohazard waste. This effects 12 residents (R6, R12, R32, R80, R106, R110, R125, R88, R11, R24, R66, & R127) in a sample of 32. Findings: 1. On 9/12/23 at 11:53 AM, a paper towel with blood on it was observed in R11 and R24's shared bathroom sink. 2. on 9/12/23 at 1:02 PM V6 (CNA/Certified Nurse Aide) provided incontinence care for R66. V6 put on gloves and provided perineal care, removed soiled brief, applied cream to perineal area, applied clean brief, and repositioned R66 and adjusted R66's bed and never changed her gloves or cleaned her hands. On 9/12/23 at 1:18 PM, V6 said, I forgot to clean my hands, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have call lights accessible to dependent resident. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 32. The findings include: On 9/12/23 at 11:35 AM, R57 was observed sitting in wheelchair in her room by the window. R57's call light was on the bedside table close to the bed. R57 said she could not reach the call light and would like the call light placed within her reach. R57's face sheet (9/13/23) showed that R57 had the following diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic after care following surgical amputation, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care and fall. R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R57's cognition is intact, R57 needs extensive assistance with two or more person physical assist with toilet use and extensive assistance with one person physical assist with personal hygiene. R57's care plan (initiated 8/12/23) shows that R57 is at risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively communicate with 1 resident (R53) that did not speak English, in a sample of 32. The findings include: R53 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], who's primary language is Italian. R53's diagnoses include heart failure, stage 4 kidney disease, pain of joints and lower back, and depression. On 9/12/23 at 2:19 PM R53 was in bed watching TV. The surveyor asked R53 how was the service that she was receiving at the facility, but the surveyor was unable to understand her reply because R53 replied in a foreign language. On 9/14/23 at 9:00 - 9:19 AM, R53 was in bed eating her breakfast. The surveyor asked R53 what she ate for breakfast, V7 (Nurse) was present, R53 replied in her native language. The surveyor asked V7 what R53's reply was, and the nurse said she did not know, but she thought she wanted something. V7 then asked R53, What do you want? V7 showed R53 a piece of paper that had pictures on it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain vital information regarding residents' pacemakers and ensure that it was readily available in the resident's medical record. This applies to 3 out of 3 residents (R4, R34, R52) reviewed for pacemakers in a sample of 32. Findings include: 1. R4's face sheet documents an admission date of 8/28/2017. R4's face sheet documents the following diagnoses: unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, anemia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. On 9/13/23 at 2:24 PM, R4's medical record was reviewed with V2 (DON-Director of Nursing). There was no physician order on the POS (Physician Order Sheet) documenting the pacemaker and how often it should be checked. There was nothing in the progress notes, admission assessment or care plans that document the manufacturer, model, and serial number of the pacemaker. It was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer and monitor a resident on intravenous fluid therapy. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R119) reviewed for intravenous therapy in a sample of 32. The findings include: On 9/14/23 at 09:02 AM, R119 was observed in bed with IV (Intravenous) fluids hung on an IV pole and the tubing attached to an IV on the resident's right hand. R119 was sleeping. R119's IV fluid bag was full and the IV chamber was not dripping or administering the IV fluid therapy to R119. R119's IV fluid bag and tubing also did not have labels on them. At 09:30 AM, the IV fluids were still attached to R119, and the fluids were still not infusing into R119's IV and he was not receiving the IV therapy. At 10:25 AM, R119's IV fluids were still not infusing into R119's IV. At 10:25 AM, V4 entered R119's room and said R119 had not received any fluids from the bag hanging and there was something wrong with R119's IV. R119's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R119 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to contain reusable nebulizer treatment masks, and incentive spirometers. This effects 3 residents (R3, R11, and R68) in a sample of 32. Findings: 1. On 9/12/23 at 1:45 PM, R3's nebulizer mask was observed on her bedside table not covered. R3's diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease and asthma. 2. On 9/12/23 at 11:53 AM, R11's nebulizer mask was observed uncovered in her opened drawer of her bedside table. R11 said, The last time I used it was a week ago. R11's diagnosis included asthma. 3. On 9/12/23 01:27 PM, R68's incentive spirometer was observed uncovered on his bedside table. R68's diagnosis include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease and dementia. On 9/13/23 at 2:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said incentive spirometer and respiratory equipment including masks should be covered for infection control. The facility Nebulizer therapy policy dated 4/1/23 showed that masks should be stored in a plastic bag.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$144,133 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $18,915 — penalty dated 2025-06-04
  • $58,852 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
  • $14,307 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
  • $42,224 — penalty dated 2024-06-07
  • $9,835 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-02 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PEARL HEALTHCARE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ELK GROVE HOLDING COMPANY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2023
BEN COHEN TRUST FBO JOANNA DAVISONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2023
BEN COHEN TRUST FBO JOHN C. DAVISONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2023
BEN COHEN TRUST FBO MARK EDWARD DAVISONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2023
AHMED, WAHAJIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2023
WAHEED, MADIHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2023
ZEFFREN, EITANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2023

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$923K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 11%Other / private 18%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $923K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,796per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145689. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next