No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pearl Of St Charles, The

850 Dunham Rd, Saint Charles, IL 60174 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 109 certified beds · (630) 443-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$41,294 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $41,294 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2900 Foxfield Rd Ste 200 · (630) 377-7900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
652 Kirk Rd · (630) 587-0855 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
652 Kirk Rd · (630) 587-0847 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%13.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms70.4%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.5%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.3%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%63.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.6%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.382.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.852.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.3%CMS range 49.8–67.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 5.9–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.1–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
59.1%
Total nursing turnover
65.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-28 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe discharge for a resident with insulin-dependent diabetes and end-stage renal failure, requiring hemodialysis. This failure resulted in R1 being discharged from the facility and sent to a homeless shelter without the shelter's knowledge or ability to accept and care for the resident. Because of the resident's homelessness, R1 was transported to the local hospital, where he remained as of August 22, 2024, awaiting placement in another long-term care facility. These failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 3. The findings include: The immediate jeopardy began on August 14, 2024 when the facility involuntarily discharged R1 to a homeless shelter. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on August 22, 2024 at 1:33 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the immediacy was removed on August 26, 2024, at 2:36 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely assist and position a resident (R1) in bed when rendering care. This failure resulted in the resident falling out of bed and sustaining left tibial and ankle fractures. This applies to 1 out of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, post-orthopedic surgery to both ankle tendons, history of other disease of the nervous system, and history of malignant neoplasm of the brain. R1's Hospital Records dated 12/8/2024, said [R1] fell approx. (approximately) 4 ft from bed while being changed by CNA. She states she rolled off on the right side of the bed landed on left side. The hospital records continued to say R1 sustained left tibial and ankle fractures. On 12/12/2024 at 12:50 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-11-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was being managed after being discharged from the hospital for an ankle fracture. This failure resulted R1 experiencing uncontrolled pain for 4 days. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain (R1) in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local community hospital with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Mood Disorder, Depression and Pathological fracture to her right ankle. R1's 10/20/23 facility assessment shows her cognition is intact and she has no memory impairments. R1's hospital records show she was admitted to a local community hospital on [DATE] following a fall resulting in displaced fractures of the medical and lateral malleoli (ankle bone fractures). R1's hospital discharge transfer summary completed on 10/17/23 shows R1 should continue to take the following medications for pain at the facility Hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to call to clarify a medication order and failed to obtain prescriptions for a resident's medication. This failure resulted in a 4-day delay in R1 receiving her psychotropic medications and experiencing symptoms of mania. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local community hospital with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Mood Disorder, Depression and Pathological fracture to her right ankle. R1's 10/20/23 facility assessment shows her cognition is intact and she has no memory impairments. R1's hospital records show she was admitted to a local community hospital on [DATE] following a fall resulting in an ankle fracture. R1's hospital discharge transfer summary completed on 10/17/23 shows R1 should continue to take the following medications upon admission to the facility: Dextroamphetamine-amphetamine XR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-01-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained for a resident receiving enteral nutrition. This failure resulted in R73 sustaining an 18.2 lb (10.47%) weight loss in three weeks. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R73) reviewed for enteral nutrition in the sample of 19. The findings include: R73's admission Record sheet shows the following diagnoses: right humerus fracture, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure, dysphagia, cerebral infarction, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Barrett's esophagus, dysphagia, aphasia, and chronic kidney disease stage 2. R73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R73 was receiving 51 percent (%) or more of total calories through a tube feeding. R73's Order Summary Report printed on 1/24/23 at 4:26 PM, shows an active order for weekly weights with a start date of 9/16/2022. The directions state, to weigh R73 in the morning every 7 days for weight monitoring *MUST BE WEIGHED R/T…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with foot care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for foot care in a sample of 3. The findings include:R1's Face sheet, dated 1/28/26, shows R1's diagnoses included Type 2 hemiplegia/hemiparesis, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease. MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 1/2/26, shows R1's cognition was severely impaired and R1 was dependent on staff for putting on and taking off footwear, lower body dressing, and showering/bathing and R1 required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene. The MDS shows R1 had no skin problems at the time of assessment. Physician Order Sheet, dated 1/28/26, shows R1 had physician orders for daily skin check every night shift for prevention if moderate to high risk based on Braden scale and perform daily skin check if any skin issues are identified and a weekly skin check every Monday for his skin assessment. R1 also had physician orders for betadine paint/foam daily to be applied to his right foot daily and an order to apply house stock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error for 1 of 10 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors.The findings include:R1's face sheet documents diagnoses which include fracture of left calcaneus with delayed healing, fracture of first metatarsal bone, left foot, fractured shaft of left tibia, displaced fracture of left acetabulum, fractured shaft of left fibula, fractured left pubis and fractured left ileum due to motorcycle driver injury. R1 also with diagnoses of anemia, intestinal obstruction, and hypertension. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 12/28/25 documents he has intact cognitive functions.On 1/6/26 at 11:00 AM, R1 said on October 19, 2025, around midnight, V17 (Registered Nurse/RN) administered the wrong IV (Intravascular) medication. He said after the medication was infused, he noticed that the medication had a different resident's name. He said he informed the nurse immediately.On 1/6/26 at between 11:20 AM and 12:00 PM, separate interviews with V7 (RN) and V9 (RN/Unit Manager) said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow sanitary practices in the facility kitchen. This applies to 74 residents that received foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings include: Facility's CMS Form 671 dated February 24, 2025 showed that the facility census was 76 residents. Facility provided information that there were 2 residents on NPO (nothing by mouth). On February 24 at 9:15 AM, during initial tour of the facility kitchen, the following observations were made. At the side of the ice machine there was a plastic scoop placed inverted (scoop handle up) in a plastic scoop holder that was attached to the wall. Inside the bottom of the scoop holder there was some pooled water with blackish substances that was touching the inverted top of the scoop. V5 (Dietary Manager) who had come into the vicinity was notified of the same. On a counter in the kitchen, there were several cardboard boxes of various types of breaded items. One box contained four plastic packets (12 count each packet) of hot dog buns with whitish substance noted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dining room in a sanitary condition during meal service and failed to clean a resident room. This applies to 8 of 18 residents (R1, R7, R12, R27, R51, R58, R125 and R126) reviewed for environment in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On February 25, 2025 at 8:40 AM, V9 (Restorative Aide) was seen taking breakfast meal trays from a free standing cart in the small dining room that served residents that needed supervision or assistance. V9 set up each tray before handing it out to the residents. The dining room tables appeared very dirty with smears of unknown substance and crumbs/debris on it. The floor also was littered with covers of the straws, bits and pieces of paper and food crumbs. R1 was seen seated in a wheelchair wiping the soiled table she was seated at with a disposable wipe. Other residents in the dining room included R7, R27, R51, R58, R125 and R126 who were seated at tables that were soiled with above mentioned unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming and hygiene for residents who requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. This applies to 5 of 18 residents (R12, R41, R51, R125, and R225) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R51 is 92 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include dementia and legal blindness. R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows that she is cognitively impaired and requires substantial/maximal assistance for grooming and hygiene. On February 24, 2025, at 11:21 AM, R51 was sitting in the dayroom, staring in space. R51 displays long jagged fingernails with black/brown substance underneath. 2. Face sheet shows that R125 is 89 years-old has multiple medical diagnoses which include dementia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone. R125's MDS dated [DATE], shows that he is cognitively impaired and requires substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide lunch meal options of similar nutritive value and failed to accommodate a resident's dietary intolerances. This applies to 4 of 4 (R35, R43, R58, R59) residents reviewed for dining in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. Facility daily production sheet for February 24, 2025 lunch meal included Italian Herb chicken (3 oz/ounce), buttered noodles (4 oz), Brussels sprouts (4 oz) dinner roll, and cake of the day. On February 24 at 12:22 PM, V6 (Chef) was seen making a grilled cheese sandwich with 2 slices of bread and 2 slices of cheese for R58 whose tray card showed a diet order of Vegetarian diet. R58 received the same with a 4 oz portion each of noodles and Brussels sprouts and a side of cake for dessert. V10 (Cook) who was on the tray line, stated that R58 gets grilled cheese every day. Facility daily production sheet for February 25, 2025 lunch meal included pork fried rice (8 oz), oriental vegetables, dinner roll, tropical fruit mix. Facility provided information that each 8 oz serving of pork…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide high calorie nutrition supplement as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R19, R27, R20 and R326) reviewed for supplements in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R19's face sheet included quadriplegia, other acute osteomyelitis, left femur, dysphagia, unspecified. R19's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that R19 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for eating. R19's diet order on POS (Physician Order Sheet) included General diet, Regular texture, Regular (Thin) consistency, High Calorie Drink four times a day for (Brand Name) Plus High Protein with meals and at bedtime (start date October 11, 2024). On February 24, 2025 at 11:00 AM, R19 was lying in bed watching television with head propped up on a pillow. R19 stated that he is unable to use arms as both were contracted. Stated that he is fed by staff, regular consistency food and did not get any (Brand Name) nutrition supplement for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions), TBP (Transmission Based Precautions), and hand hygiene during provisions of care. This applies to 4 of 18 residents (R41, R44, R57, and R326) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R326 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. R326's hospital records dated February 13, 2025, showed R326 had a history of Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (a drug resistant organism). On February 25, 2025, at 8:29 AM, V15 (Registered Nurse/RN) said R326 needed to be repositioned in bed. V15 and V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) entered R326's room. V15 and V16 did not wear an isolation gown while repositioning R326 in bed. On February 26, 2025, at 11:02 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide education regarding the seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R1, R53, R57, R58) reviewed for immunization in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R1's medical record showed R1 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including cerebral palsy, anemia, and essential hypertension. There was no documentation to show R1 was offered or provided education regarding the seasonal influenza vaccine for 2024-2025 season. 2. R53's medical record showed R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis due to cerebral infarction, cardiac arrythmia, myalgia and essential hypertension. There was no documentation to show R53 was offered or provided education regarding the seasonal influenza vaccine for the 2024-2025 season. 3. R57's medical record showed R57 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education and obtain consent or declination for the COVID-19 booster vaccine for the 2024-2025 vaccine. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R1, R47, R53, R57, and R58) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R1's medical record showed R1 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including cerebral palsy, anemia, and essential hypertension. There was no documentation to show R1 was offered, or education provided regarding the COVID-19 booster vaccine for 2024-2025. 2. R47's medical record showed R47 was [AGE] years old, and was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including human immunodeficiency virus, anoxic brain damage, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis due to cerebral infarction, unspecified asthma, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. There was no documentation to show R47 or representative was offered, or education provided regarding the COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed treat a resident with dignity by offering the resident slippers that were soiled with stool and by not cleaning the same slippers. This applies to 1 of 18 residents (R12) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 18. The findings include: R12's Face Sheet showed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, Partial intestinal obstruction, Ileostomy Status, malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the colon, and reduced mobility. R12's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed R12 was cognitively intact. On February 24, 2025 at 10:42 AM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) entered R12's room to change R12's ileostomy. R12's gown, abdomen, fitted sheet, and back were wet with liquid stool. V18 wiped R12's abdominal area with an incontinence wipe and changed her ileostomy dressing. V18 left the room and said she would send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the indwelling urinary catheters of residents were secured, and the urinary bag was not resting on the floor. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R11, R41, and R57) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows, R57 is 66 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 3B, urethral stricture, male, unspecified site, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms, presence of urogenital implants. R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows, R57 is alert and oriented and requires assistance for toileting. R57's Care Plan with revision date of February 11, 2025, shows: R57 has chronic indwelling catheter related to BPH and urethral stricture. The goal is for R57 to be free from complications related to the use of catheter. The same care plan shows multiple interventions which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for management of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R57) reviewed for care of intravenous catheter in the sample of 18. The findings include: On February 25, 2025, at 9:37 AM, V15 (Registered Nurse) administered an IV (Intravenous) antibiotic (Ceftriaxone 2 grams) medication to R57 who had a PICC line on his right upper arm. The PICC line dressing, which was dated February 3, 2025, was loose and opened halfway. Physician Order Summary (POS) Report dated February 9, 2025, shows PICC line dressing change once a week and as needed one time a day every 7 days for infection prevention. R57's care plan with revision dated of February 11, 2025, shows R57 has PICC line on the right basilic for IV antibiotic infusion. The goal is for the PICC line to remain free from signs of infection. This same care plan shows multiple interventions which include to change dressing weekly, or sooner, if it is soiled, loose, or damp. Use sterile aseptic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a physician order and care plan for oxygen administration in accordance with their policy. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R325) reviewed for oxygen use in the sample of 18. The findings include: R325 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on oxygen, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, centrilobular emphysema, influenza A, and cyst of the pancreas. On February 24, 2025, at 12:10 PM, R325 was observed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. R325's Health Status note dated February 24, 2025, at 11:12 PM showed continuous oxygen was administered at 3L (Liters) per NC (Nasal Cannula). On February 26, 2025, at 10:10 AM, R325 was observed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. V15 (RN/registered Nurse) stated the oxygen was infusing at 3L per NC and R325 can have 4L per NC if R325 gets anxious. R325's hospital H&P (History and Physical) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's medical records within two working days upon request for two of three residents (R1, R7) reviewed for medical records request in the sample of eight. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet dated February 20, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, low back pain, history of falling, urinary retention, and lack of coordination. R1 was discharged from the facility January 16, 2025. On February 20, 2025 at 9:34 AM, V7 (R1's Spouse) said he has been waiting to receive R1's medical records for over a month. V7 said they requested the records from V8 (Medical Records). V7 said that R1 just had another surgery on her back. V7 said R1 is entitled to those records. V7 said that he nor R1 has heard anything back from the facility regarding their medical records request. On February 20, 2025 at 11:18 AM, V8 (Medical Records) said if someone is requesting medical records, then she has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a fall assessment and monitor a resident after a fall for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of eight. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated February 20, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, low back pain, history of falling, muscle wasting, urinary retention, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and lack of coordination. R1's Fall assessment dated [DATE] shows she is a high risk for falls. R1's Progress Note dated January 13, 2025 shows, R1 was reported to be lowered on the floor in her room. Per CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) she was transferring R1 from her chair to her bed and R1's legs gave out and R1 was lowered to the floor. R1 denied any pain or discomfort. There was no fall report, fall assessment, or follow up assessment provided by the facility regarding R1's fall. On February 20, 2025 at 12:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident verbal abuse. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include: On 11/1/24 at 10:36 AM, R1 said R2 and R3 told him to get out of the city, they don't want Mexicans here. On 11/1/24 at 11:45 AM, R3 was propelling backward in his wheelchair using his right leg. R3's left side appeared to be non-functional. R3 said he called R1 a p*y and R1 called him one arm. R1's current care plan provided by the facility shows R1 may have an increased susceptibility to abuse and is considered a vulnerable adult. R1 is to be treated with respect and dignity and will reside in the facility free of abuse. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R1 is cognitively intact and has no behaviors including hallucinations, delusions, physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, rejection of care, or wandering. R1's Progress Notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to administer antipsychotic drug, sleeping pill, nicotine patch and pain medication as ordered by the physician. The facility also failed to obtain physician order regarding administration of time-critical scheduled medications to ensure doses were evenly spaced to achieve accurate peak and maintain effectiveness. This applies to 12 of 19 residents (R3, R6, R10 through R19) reviewed for medications in the sample of 19. The findings include: The facility roster showed that R3, R6, R10 through R19 were all residing in the XXX unit of the facility. The roster also showed that census of the XXX unit was 27 residents. The staffing schedule of August 1, 2024, for the night shift nurses showed that V5 (Agency Registered Nurse) was assigned to the XXX unit for the night shift. The schedule time for night shift nurses was from 7:00 P.M. through 7:00 A.M. (12-hour shift). The staffing schedule showed that V5 came late at 11:30 P.M. on August 1,2024 P.M. 1. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was cared for in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 16. The findings include: R6's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include epilepsy, malignant neoplasm of brain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, malignant neoplasm of right female breast, and malignant neoplasm of left female breast. R6's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has no cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for showers. R6's care plan initiated 2/2/24 showed, The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit needs and participation may vary related to weakness and multiple medical comorbidities . On 4/23/24 at 12:18 PM, R6 said a few weeks ago she had some issues during a shower. R6 said she was in the shower and the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) who was assisting her had ear buds in her ears. R6 said the CNA was having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's (R1) Power of Attorney (POA) for a change in medical condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 16. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 4/25/24 showed R1 had diagnoses including but not limited to acute on chronic congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, end stage renal disease, and pleural effusion. R1's progress notes dated 4/11/24 showed, Around 1AM, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) made writer aware that resident complained of shortness of breath, even with oxygen on at 2L/min. Oxygen was 77%, blood pressure 122/69, pulse 70, clear lung sounds. Called physician and received orders to increase oxygen to 5L/min to keep oxygen saturations above 90%. Resident's oxygen improved to 86%. Bumex 2mg to be given. Tablet given at 2:16AM. STAT chest x-ray and STAT BNP/CMP (b-type natriuretic peptide/comprehensive metabolic panel) to be completed. Orders placed. R1's nursing progress notes from 4/9/24-4/11/24 were reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily of living were provided for a resident dependent on staff for cares for 1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 16. The findings include: R6's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include epilepsy, malignant neoplasm of brain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, malignant neoplasm of right female breast, and malignant neoplasm of left female breast. R6's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has no cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for showers. R6's care plan initiated 2/2/24 showed, The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit needs and participation may vary related to weakness and multiple medical comorbidities . On 4/23/24 at 12:18 PM, R6 said she has issue with staff on the weekends. R6 said this previous weekend she was not assisted to get dressed, get out of bed, or brush her teeth on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use a gait belt while transferring a resident, failed to re-evaluate interventions put in place for a resident identified as an elopement risk. These failures apply to 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 16. The findings include: 1) R3's electronic face sheet printed on 4/25/24 showed R3 has diagnoses including but not limited to senile degeneration of the brain, dementia with behaviors, overactive bladder, and primary generalized osteoarthritis. R3's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R3 has severe cognitive impairment and has no wandering behaviors. R3's care plan dated 11/20/23 showed, The resident is an elopement risk/wandered related to dementia, confusion, impaired safety awareness, agitation, wandering, looking to keep busy, resident able to propel wheelchair around facility, residents is noted to attempt pushing exit doors. Resident is noted to wander into other resident rooms. R3's elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to wear hairnets in the kitchen, failed to store thickener in a sanitary manner, and failed to maintain a lunch tray for a dialysis resident in a safe manner. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. On 3/12/24 at 10:11 AM the initial kitchen tour was initiated with V19 (Dietary Manager). V19 had a black hat on his head and his long, dark hair was pulled back in a low ponytail, resting on his shoulders. V19 had several shorter, loose strands of hair around his neck and ponytail. V19 did not have his hair contained in a hair net while he toured the dry storage, food preparation area, freezers, and refrigerators with the surveyor. During the time, the noon meal was being prepared in the kitchen. At 10:54 AM the surveyor returned to the kitchen to observe the pureed food preparation with V22 (Cook). V22 had a hair net on, but a large bunch of shoulder length hair was outside her hairnet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for advanced directive information regarding the resident's choice for life-sustaining medical treatment was obtained and the information was readily available in case of an emergency for 1 of 1 resident (R22) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 26. The findings include: R22's admission Record, printed by the facility on [DATE], showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:16 AM, a review of R22's electronic medical record showed no order for R22's advanced directive information. R22's banner page (where this information can usually be found in a resident's electronic medical record), did not have any information regarding advanced directives for R22. The miscellaneous tab in R22's electronic medical record did not have any POLST (Practitioner Order of Life-Sustaining Treatment) document. On [DATE] at 3:37 PM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Restorative Nurse) said if a resident was in cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance to a resident and failed to provide two showers per week as requested by a resident. This applies to two of three residents (R237 and R65) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. The facility face sheet for R237 shows an admission date of 3/5/24 and diagnoses to include vascular dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. The functional abilities and goals assessment completed on admission shows R237 requires partial to moderate assistance with eating. On 3/12/24 at 9:30 AM, R237 was observed sitting in her bed with her breakfast tray in front of her not attempting to eat anything. On 3/13/24 at 10:44 AM, R237 was in bed with her breakfast tray in front of her. Approximately 15% of the meal was gone. R237 said if she could get the food to her mouth, she would eat more because she was still hungry. That same day, R237 was observed in the lounge at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided to a resident before leaving for dialysis (R2) and failed to obtain daily weights for residents with CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) for 2 of 2 residents (R54, R22) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 26 and 1 resident (R2) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. On 3/13/24 at 9:04 AM, V4 (Agency Registered Nurse/RN) was standing in the middle of R2's hallway, at the medication cart, typing on his personal cell phone. When V4 looked up and realized he was being watched by the surveyor, he stopped typing and put his personal cell phone back in his scrubs pocket. At 9:07 AM, the surveyor approached V4 to observe medication administration. V4 stated, I'm about to go check [R2's] blood pressure (BP) because she has to go for dialysis at 10 AM. I'll take her BP and see if she needs her Midodrine. I don't think she takes any other medications before dialysis besides her pain medication. She told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident with swallowing difficulties during her meals and failed to safely transfer a resident. This applies to two of five residents (R237 and R1) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. The facility face sheet for R237 shows an admission date of 3/5/24 and diagnoses to include vascular dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. The functional abilities and goals assessment completed on admission shows R237 requires partial to moderate assistance with eating. On 3/12/24 at 9:30 AM, R237 was observed sitting in her bed with her breakfast tray in front of her not attempting to eat anything. On 3/13/24 at 10:44 AM, R237 was in bed with her breakfast tray in front of her. Approximately 15% of the meal was gone. R237 said if she could get the food to her mouth she would eat more because she was still hungry. On 3/14/24 at 9:00 AM, R237 was observed in bed attempting to eat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary drainage bag remained below the bladder and staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during catheter care (R60). The facility also failed to ensure catheter care orders were in place, catheter tubing was secure, and a urologist follow up appointment was scheduled (R238) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R60's face sheet printed on 3/13/24 showed diagnoses including but not limited to quadriplegia, pneumonia, anxiety, and neuromuscular bladder. R60's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed staff assistance needed for toilet hygiene, bathing, dressing, and transfers. The same assessment showed R60 uses an indwelling catheter for urinary incontinence and is always incontinent of bowel. On 3/12/24 at 11:20 AM, R60 was lying in bed covered with a light blanket. An empty blue dignity bag cover was noted hanging from the left side of the bed. V16 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's feeding tube pump was clean for 1 of 2 residents (R57) reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 26. The findings include: R57's face sheet printed on 3/14/24 showed diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and aphasia (communication disorder). R57's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and requires total staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toileting, and hygiene. The same assessment showed additional diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus disease (blood disease). The assessment showed R57 uses a PEG tube for nutrition (percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube inserted directly into the stomach). R57's March physician orders showed an order start dated 3/2/24 for: Enteral Feed Order one time a day .via feeding tube at 65 milliliters per hour .up at 5 PM, to run…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received oxygen therapy as prescribed by her physician for 1 resident (R2) reviewed for oxygen outside of the sample. The findings include: On 3/13/24 at 9:07 AM, the surveyor approached V4 (Agency Registered Nurse/RN) to observe medication administration. V4 stated, I'm about to go check [R2's] blood pressure (BP) because she has to go for dialysis at 10 AM. I'll take her BP and see if she needs her Midodrine. I don't think she takes any other medications before dialysis besides her pain medication. She told me she wants pain medication. V4 obtained an automated, wrist BP cuff and a pulse oximeter from the medication cart and entered R2's room. R2 was sitting up in her wheelchair, fully dressed. V4 told R2 he needed to check her BP and placed the wrist cuff on her left wrist. R2 had a nasal cannula in her nose, and it was attached to an empty, portable oxygen tank that was attached to her wheelchair. The needle on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a provider evaluate a resident for the use of as needed antipsychotic medication after 14 days and failed to have a stop date for an as needed antipsychotic medication. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R62) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 26. The findings include: R62's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 12/4/23. R62's Order Summary Report (Physician Order Sheet, provided 3/14/24) showed an active order for Haloperidol Lactate Oral Concentrate 2 milligrams per milliliter and to give 0.5 milliliters by mouth every 6 hours as needed for restlessness/agitation. The order shows it was started on 2/26/24 (17 days prior). The End Date column for this order was blank. R1's Order Summary Report showed R62 had not been on this medication since her admission date. R62's Progress Notes showed no provider evaluation for R62's as needed haloperidol on or about 3/11/24. R62's provider progress note on 3/4/24 at 12:18 PM (most recent documented progress note before 3/14/24)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform quarterly restorative assessments for a resident receiving restorative services then discontinued the resident's preferred restorative interventions without the resident's input or assessment. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for rehabilitation in the sample of 26. The findings include: R13's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an Original admission date of 4/15/22 with diagnoses to include reduced mobility, abnormal posture, heart failure, and depression. R13's 12/12/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS showed R13 required partial/moderate assistance for rolling in bed and substantial/maximal assistance for transferring from bed to chair. The MDS showed R13 used a wheelchair for mobility. On 3/12/24 at 3:15 PM, R13 stated, I haven't done restorative for 3 weeks. Administration told us they weren't doing it because they were revamping the restorative program. R13 stated she enjoyed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have the correct isolation signage for a resident with COVID-19 resulting in staff entering 1 resident's (R35) room with the incorrect personal protective equipment (PPE), and failed to wear the correct PPE while providing care for 2 residents (R65, R18) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R35, R65, R18) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R35's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 6/27/19. R35's Order Summary Report (provided 3/13/24) showed an order for Contact and Droplet Isolation precautions for COVID-19 to begin on 3/5/24 for 10 days. R35's 3/5/24 Progress Note from 10:45 PM showed, Routine rapid covid test done, results positive, patient now isolated. R35's 3/11/24 Health Status Note from 6:14 PM showed, Resident on contact isolation no complaint of pain . On 3/12/24 at 10:01 AM, R35's door had a contact isolation sign on the door.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide timely care and treatment to facility residents. This applies to all 88 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Facility Resident List Report, dated 2/13/24, shows the facility census was 88 residents. 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/20/24, shows R8's cognition was intact. On 2/21/24 at 11:46 AM, R8 stated on the morning of 1/1/24 at approximately 7:00 AM, he became nervous because he was having difficulty breathing. R8 stated an hour prior he was forced to ask an aid to retrieve his nurse from the other side of the building because he needed pain medication for severe pain in his chest and the nurses were working short and were covering residents on both sides of the building. R8 stated when he became short of breath, he placed his call light on and waited 45 minutes with no answer from staff. R8 stated when he finally called 911 for assistance, he told the 911 operator he had waited 45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to determine her POA (Power of Attorney) agent and make decisions regarding her care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 16. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated [DATE], shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and R1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, unspecified psychosis, and insomnia. The face sheet shows V40 (Caregiver, The Company - Outside vendor providing healthcare navigation for clients) as R1's Guardian, Responsible Party, and Emergency Contact #2. The face sheet also shows V10 (Director of Operations, The Company) as R1's POAHC (Health Care Power of Attorney for Health Care), POA-Care, and Emergency Contact #1. On [DATE] at 11:52 AM, V1 (Administrator) reviewed R1's face sheet and stated the face sheet was incorrect because R1 had no legal guardian established. MDS (Minimum Data Set)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely care and treatment to residents in respiratory distress. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R8) reviewed for improper nursing in a sample of 16. The findings include: 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/20/24, shows R8's cognition was intact. On 2/21/24 at 11:46 AM, R8 stated on the morning of 1/1/24 at approximately 7:00 AM, he became nervous because he was having difficulty breathing. R8 stated an hour prior he was forced to ask an aid to retrieve his nurse from the other side of the building because he needed pain medication for severe pain in his chest and the nurses were working short and were covering residents on both sides of the building. R8 stated when he became short of breath, he placed his call light on and waited 45 minutes with no answer from staff. R8 stated when he finally called 911 for assistance, he told the 911 operator he had waited 45 minutes with no response from facility staff. Review of R8's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility Social Services failed to clarify POA (Power of Attorney) and guardianship status of a resident residing at the facility. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for social services in a sample of 16. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated [DATE], shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and R1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, unspecified psychosis, and insomnia. The face sheet shows V40 (Caregiver, The Company - Outside vendor providing healthcare navigation for clients) as R1's Guardian, Responsible Party, and Emergency Contact #2. The face sheet also shows V10 (Director of Operations, The Company) as R1's POAHC (Power of Attorney for Health Care), POA-Care and Emergency Contact #1. On [DATE] at 11:52 AM, V1 (Administrator) reviewed R1's face sheet and stated the face sheet was incorrect because R1 had no legal guardian established. MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle, store, wash, and sanitize dishes and utensils in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Resident Census and Condition of Residents (CMS 672 form) dated 1/23/2023, shows there are 93 residents residing in the facility. 1. On 1/23/2023 at 9:58 AM, V9 (Dietary Aide) and V10 (Dietary Aide) were washing dishes wearing gloves. V9 was removing food debris from soiled dishes while V10 was pre rinsing the soiled dishes and then putting them into a dish rack before loading it into the dish machine. V10 then removed clean and sanitized dishes from dish racks in the drying area without changing his gloves. At 10:05 AM, V8 (Food Service Manager) said that the proper process of handling dishes is to grab the dishes, put them into the dish rack, pre spray them and then put them through the dish machine. Before removing the clean dishes from the racks, employees are to change gloves or wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adjust an antibiotic start and end date on a Medication Administration Record (MAR) when the medication became available, failed to inform a Nurse Practitioner when several doses of an antibiotic were missed, and failed to ensure medications were not left at residents' bedside for 4 of 19 residents (R3, R29, R58, and R72) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. On 01/23/23 at 10:31 AM, R29 said she did not get all of her antibiotic. R29's Progress Note dated 10/27/22 entered by V15 (Nurse Practitioner) showed R29 was complaining of, pain and pressure with urination. The same note showed R29 was started on an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. R29's order history report showed the antibiotic was to be given 3 times a day for 7 days. On 1/25/23 at 11:45 AM, V23 (Pharmacy Customer Service Lead) said the antibiotic was approved to be dispensed on 10/28/22 and delivered to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a room set up which allows unobstructed access to the bathroom and entrance/exit door for 1 of 19 residents (R4) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 19. The findings include: On 1/23/23 at 1:05 PM, R4 was sitting in the dining room. R4 said her roommate has extra storage furniture in their room and uses a mechanical lift which blocks the bathroom door, and she has had accidents because she could not get to the bathroom. On 1/24/23 at 9:01 AM, V18 (Registered Nurse/RN) was passing medications to R16 (R4's roommate) in their room. R16 was sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed with her bedside table behind and to her left side next to the sink. As V18 was giving R16's medications, R4 tried to exit the room with her walker and there was no room to get by in order to access the door (or bathroom had it been needed). V18 asked this surveyor to move R16's table so R4 could leave the room. V18 ended up moving R16's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide R89 with bed hold policy and return when discharged to the hospital for one of two residents (R89) reviewed for discharge in the sample of nineteen. The findings include: On 01/25/2023 V1 (Administrator) was unable to provide a copy or documentation of R89 being provided with the facility's bed hold policy and return. On 01/25/2023 at 12:45PM, V21 (Admissions) said, I provide the resident with a copy of the bed hold policy on admission. I do not provide a copy at the time of transfer. R89's Progress Notes dated 12/09/2022 shows, Laboratory Note, Note Text: hospitalized as of 12/8/22. No nursing documentation related to R89's discharge were found in R89's Progress Notes. The facility's Bed-Hold Policy revised 4/21/2021 shows, bed-hold policy should be provided, at the time of transfer and if applicable, given with in advance to the transfer.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents requiring extensive assistance were provided personal cares for 2 of 19 residents (R23 and R240) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. On 1/23/23 at 10:54 AM, R23 was lying in bed in her room. V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) began changing R23's brief. R23's brief was saturated with urine which soaked through a draw sheet, a fitted sheet, and left the mattress wet, as well. V19 said she began her shift at 7:00 AM today and has not yet changed R23 since she arrived. V19 said residents are changed every two hours. R23 said she was last changed by the night shift before they left around 7:00 AM that morning. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows she is cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R23's current Care Plan provided by the facility shows R23 has an ADL self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were being implemented and failed to ensure a physician prescribed pressure injury dressing was re- applied for 1 of 4 residents (R240) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 19. The findings include: On 1/23/23 at 10:00 AM R240 was lying in bed. He had no pillows underneath his feet, and they were not being off loaded. His right heel and left ankle were flat against the mattress. There were green pressure reduction boots sitting across the room in his wheelchair. On 1/23/23 at 12:49 PM, R240's heels were still flat against the mattress with no pillows underneath them. R240 did not have an air mattress on his bed. On 1/24/23 at 8:20 AM, R240 was in bed. R240's legs were curled up and his left ankle and right heel were lying flat on the mattress. There was no dressing covering R240's pressure injury to the outer aspect of his left ankle. The open pressure injury was exposed, and he was rubbing it back and forth against the bottom sheet. On 1/24/23 at 8:46 AM, V7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was kept off the floor for 1 of 2 residents (R47) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 19. The findings include: R47's Infection Disease Consult Note dated 1/16/23 showed R47 had a history of a urinary tract infection that required intravenous antibiotics. On 1/23/23 at 10:47 AM, R47 was in bed. R47's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was not hanging from anything, and the bottom half of the bag was resting directly on the floor. The collection bag was in the same position at the following times: 11:28 AM, 12:50 PM, and 1:30 PM. On 1/24/23 at 1:05 PM, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said the urinary drainage bag should be kept off the floor to help prevent a urinary tract infection. The facility's Standards and Guidelines: SG Indwelling Catheters policy with a revised date of 3/27/21 showed, Catheter care should be provided in a manner that promotes infection control .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 4 residents (R29) reviewed for medications in the sample of 19. The findings include: On 01/23/23 at 10:31 AM, R29 said she did not get all of her antibiotic. R29's Progress Note dated 10/27/22 showed R29 was started on a 7-day course of antibiotics for a urinary tract infection. R29's order history report showed an order for an antibiotic that was to be given 3 times a day for 7 days. R29's October and November 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the antibiotic was to start on 10/27/22 and end on 11/3/22. The MAR indicated the medication was not available or not given for the following doses: 10/27/22 at 10:00 PM, 10/28/22 at 6:00 AM, 10/28/22 at 2:00 PM, 10/28/22 at 10:00 PM, 10/29/22 at 6:00 AM, and 10/30/22 at 2:00 PM. The MAR indicated R29 missed 6 out of 21 doses of the antibiotic. On 1/24/23 at 9:09 AM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said medications should be given as ordered. On 01/23/23 at 01:45 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide radiological services in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R73) reviewed for radiological services in the sample of 19. The findings include: R73's admission Record sheet shows the following diagnoses: right humerus fracture, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure, dysphagia, cerebral infarction, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Barrett's esophagus, dysphagia, aphasia, and chronic kidney disease stage 2. R73's Health Status Note dated 1/4/2023 at 9:55 PM, showed R73 was found seated on wheelchair leg stands in her room. R73 was assessed and assisted to bed. R73's Post Fall Day 2 Health Status Note dated 1/6/2023 at 11:48 PM, states that R73 vocalized cries of pain and discomfort during touch to right upper extremity and noted bruising and discoloration.have STAT x-ray performed to right upper extremity to r/o fracture. R73's Health Status Note dated 1/6/2023 at 8:19 PM, showed the x-ray company was unable to conduct the x-ray because she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$41,294 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $10,269 — penalty dated 2024-12-13
  • $17,102 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
  • $13,923 — penalty dated 2023-11-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PEARL HEALTHCARE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PHC ST CHARLES HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2023
HOOLI OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 12/01/2023
GRINBLATT, ELIYAHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 12/01/2023
850 DUNHAM RD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
CCG BARBADOS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
RAJCHENBACH, CHAIMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
SCHNEIDER, MENDELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2023
SHABAT, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2023
ZEFFREN, EITANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
CUBIS, SANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
THAKKAR, JAYESHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
MAGENCE, MEYERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
CASCADE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
GPN FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$396K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 10%Other / private 28%

This home reported $396K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,934per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145980. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next