Signature Healthcare Of Bremen
316 Woodies Lane, Bremen, IN 46506 · Government - Hospital district · 73 certified beds · (574) 546-3494 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.2% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.3% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 8.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.76 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.74 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.7%CMS range 33.0–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.9–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 57.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan related to food allergies was followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dietary needs. (Resident B)Finding includes:On 10/8/25 at 12:12 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, feeding difficulties, stroke, gastro-esophageal reflux, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and atrial fibrillation.Resident B's most recent Face Sheet, dated 10/4/25, indicated the resident had an allergy to Tomatoes. Physician's orders included but were not limited to, a dietary order dated 2/28/25, that indicated the resident was allergic to tomatoes.Resident B's Care Plans included but were not limited to,1. Resident B had cognitive loss and dementia with impaired decision-making skills, dated 7/18/23. 2. Resident had an allergy to tomato, dated 2/20/24, and indicated the resident would not be served tomato at meals. 3. Resident B was at nutritional risk due to dementia, dated 7/26/23, and indicated the facility would provide his diet as ordered, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders related to treatment of a pressure ulcer were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care, (Resident B).Finding includes: On 10/8/25 at 12:12 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, hypertensive heart disease, stroke, vascular dementia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, need for assistance with personal care, muscle wasting and atrophy. A facility Event Report, dated 8/19/25 at 3:00 P.M., indicated Resident B had developed a Stage 2 pressure wound to the right heel that measured 5 cm long, 7.5 cm wide and 0.2 cm in depth. A physician's order, dated 8/19/25 through 8/27/25, indicated to cleanse the wound to the right heel with wound wash, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to the wound bed and cover with ABD (specialized medical dressing designed for managing moderate to heavily seeping wounds) and rolled gauze, every morning. A new physician's order, dated 8/27/25 with no end date,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during a medication pass for 2 of 4 residents observed. (Resident 8 & 20) Finding includes: During an observation of a medication pass, on 2/12/2025 at 8:01 A.M., LPN 6 prepared Resident 8's medications. LPN 6, with her bare hands, broke 2 potassium chloride tablets in half. She indicated this was the only way she could break the tablets in half and she had sanitized her hands prior to starting the preparation of medication. During an observation, on 2/12/2025 at 8:08 A.M, LPN 6 was at the medication cart and coughed into her bare hand. During an observation, on 2/12/2025 at 8:10 A.M., LPN 6 prepared Resident 20's insulin injection. LPN 6 did not sanitize her hands prior to the preparation of the insulin. LPN 6 administered Resident 20's insulin injection without gloved hands. LPN 6 indicated she should have sanitized her hands between the resident's medication administration. During an interview, on 2/17/2025 at 11:52 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated LPN 6 should have worn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchens and 2 of 2 resident nutrition pantries. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 59 of 61 residents who received meals out of the kitchen. (main kitchen, north unit nutrition pantry & south unit nutrition pantry). Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 2/11/2025 at 10: 26 A.M., with the Dietary Manager the following was observed: In the walk in freezer: - there was an opened bag of chicken pieces not sealed. - the floor had pieces of food and other debris. 2. In the walk in cooler: - there was an opened container of Med Plus (supplement) with an expiration date of 1/8/2025. - there was 2 opened containers of Thickened liquid with no date when they had been opened. - there was an opened bag of hash browns with a use by date of 2/6/2025. - and a metal container of shredded pork with a use by date of 2/8/2025. 3. In the dry storage area: - there was an opened bag of graham crackers crumbs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive was completed upon admission for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident 63). Finding includes: A record review was completed on 2/13/2025 at 10:21 A.M. for Resident 63 and indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/28/2025 indicated the resident's cognition was significantly impaired. A Physician's Order, dated 1/22/2025 indicated the following: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The record lacked documentation of a completed DNR form signed by Resident 63 and/or the resident's representative. During an interview on 2/13/2025 at 3:00 P.M., the Administrator indicated the resident should have had a signed DNR form upon admission. On 2/13/2025 at 2:35 P.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled, Advance Directives, dated 5/13/2024 and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. The policy indicated, .During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of hospital transfers for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 52) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 52 was completed on 2/13/2025 at 10:13 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder and obstructive and reflux uropathy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/14/2025, indicated Resident 52 had severe cognitive impairment and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 9/7/2024 at 2:20 P.M., indicated Resident 52 was transferred to a neuropsychological hospital. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 9/23/2024 at 11:42 A.M., indicated Resident 52 returned to the facility. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 9/27/2024 at 9:09 P.M., indicated Resident 52 had removed her urinary catheter. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 10/2/2025 at 11:24 P.M., indicated Resident 52 returned to the facility from the hospital. A report was provided from the hospital that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 54) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/11/2025 at 11:16 A.M., Resident 54 indicated she had fallen about 5 times with no major injuries within the last few months. A record review was completed on 2/14/2025 at 1:15 P.M. for Resident 54. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic bronchitis and generalized anxiety disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/2025, indicated Resident 54's cognition was intact, she had no behavior issues, no functional impairments, ambulated without assistive device, was independent with toileting and transfers, and had no falls since the previous MDS assessment. The Events section of the clinical record for Resident 54 indicated the resident had two falls in January 2025, on 1/2/2025 and on 1/3/2025. There were no major injuries. During an interview on 2/14/2025 at 2:21 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for skin issues and abusive behaviors for 3 of 19 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Residents 5, 38 and 52) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 2/11/2025 at 11:53 A.M., Resident 5 indicated she picked at the areas on her face. Two scabbed areas with redness were bserved on the residents' face. The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 2/14/2025 at 9:44 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: arthritis, osteoporosis and dysphagia. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 6/24/2024, indicated the following: 3.2 x 2.0 x 0 circle redness to the left cheek. The resident denies pain to the area, itchy at times. Current Physician Orders included: Triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.025 % apply topical to irritation to left cheek twice a day, ordered on 6/26/2024. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 6/26/2024, indicated triamcinolone 0.025 twice daily ordered for irritated spot-on left cheek. The resident states she has had it for years and it's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received scheduled showers for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL) care. (Residents 57 & 48) Findings include: 1.During an observation, on 2/11/2025 at 12:05 P.M, Resident 57 was observed in the dining room and had greasy and disheveled hair. During an observation, on 2/12/2025 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 57 was observed in the dining room and had greasy and disheveled hair. During an observation, on 2/14/2025 at 11:58 A.M., Resident 57 was observed in his room with his hair disheveled, greasy and with white specks in his hair. Resident 52 indicated he had not refused his showers and received a shower the other night. A record review for Resident 57 was completed on 2/13/2025 at 9:23 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia and diabetes mellitus type 2. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/2024, indicated Resident 57 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision for bathing. A Physician's Order, dated 12/20/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who returned from a hospital stay was assessed for new and or existing skin issues for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin issues. (Resident 38) Finding includes: During an interview, on 2/12/2025 at 9:09 A.M., Resident 38 was observed with numerous purple areas to both arms and hands. The record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 2/13/2025 at 2:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to congestive heart failure, diabetes, renal disease and hypertension. Current Physician Orders included: - Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) every day. - Weekly Skin Assessment . A Nursing Progress Note, dated 2/3/2025, indicated the resident returned to the facility and numerous bruises on his upper extremities bilaterally were observed, related to IV's and blood draws. An admission Assessment, dated 2/3/2025, indicated the resident had a Skin Impairment upon admission and staff were directed to complete a Skin Event assessment. The clinical record lacked a skin event and documentation/assessment of the numerous bruised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement effective behavior monitoring to prevent resident to resident altercations from recurring. (Resident 52) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/12/2025 at 9:25 A.M., Resident 52 was crying at an activity. A record review for Resident 52 was completed on 2/13/2025 at 10:13 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and delusional disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, on 1/14/2025, indicated Resident 52 had severe cognitive impairment, no mood or behavior issues and was taking an antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant medication. A Physician's Order, dated 11/7/2024, indicated behavior monitoring for pointing fingers at other residents and taking her clothing off. A Psychiatry Initial Consult note, dated 11/8/2024, indicated Resident 52 was observed pacing, restless, crying, confused and mildly agitated. Resident 52 was difficult for staff to redirect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided for 8 of 17 residents reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). (Residents H, J, L, C, N, P, M & Q) Findings include: 1. The record review for Resident H was completed on 10/31/2024 at 10:34 A.M. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to dementia, anxiety, need for assistance with personal care and dysphagia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/21/2024, indicated Resident H resident was dependent on staff for showers. Shower documentation for Resident H, dated 10/1/2024 thru 10/31/2024, indicted the resident had only received a shower on 10/13/2024 and 10/19/2024. A current Care Plan, dated 9/13/2024, indicated the resident needed staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. During an interview, on 11/1/2024 at 8:45 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the resident should have received two showers a week. 2. During an interview, on 10/30/2024 at 11:41 A.M., Resident J indicated he did not always receive a shower two times a week. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a continent resident timely assistance for toileting that resulted in an incontinence episode for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for toileting. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/30/2024 at 12:20 P.M., Resident C was in a small dining room sitting in a reclining chair. The resident asked CNA 10, who walked by her, to take her to the bathroom. CNA 10 responded I'll see what your aides are doing now. At 12:21 P.M., the resident started to moan and stated Please help!, while trying to reposition herself in the reclining chair. Resident C was observed to bang her right hand down numerous times on the armrest of the chair while still moaning. CNA 10 observed to entered the dining room and asked Resident C,What's going on?, Resident C replied,I need to go to the bathroom. CNA 10 indicated Well, we are about to eat. Resident C indicated, I know but I have asked for ½ hour to go to the bathroom and they say I can't go by myself. CNA 10 left the dining room without assisting Resident C to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of an elevated heart rate and seizure activity and missed medications for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for pharmaceuticals. (Resident N and E) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident N was reviewed on 10/30/2024 at 11:45 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, anxiety, depression, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation and chronic venous hypertension. Physician Orders for Resident N, dated 1/2/2024, included Eliquis (anticoagulant) 2.5 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet twice a day for atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that begins in the heart's upper chambers or atria). A current Care Plan, reviewed 8/21/2024, indicated Resident N had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Interventions included but were not limited to: observe for and report heart palpitations, irregular heartbeat and tachycardia (a heart rate that is faster than a hundred beats per minute), and notify physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for seizures for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for medication. (Resident E) Finding includes: A record review for Resident E was completed on 10/30/2024 at 2:07 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (severe form of epilepsy), severe intellectual disabilities, autistic disorder and schizophreniform disorder. Resident E was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review for Resident E was completed on 10/30/2024 at 2:07 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, severe intellectual disabilities, autistic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, and epilepsy. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/23/2024, indicated Resident E had severe cognitive disability and received medications of an antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant. He had an active diagnosis of seizure disorder Current Physician's Orders for medications to treat seizures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were administered for 2 of 10 residents whose medications were reviewed. (Residents J & L) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident J was completed on 10/31/2024 at 10:16 A.M. Diagnoses included: Parkinson's disease, dementia, neurogenic bladder and diabetes and pain in joints. Current Physician Orders for Resident J included: Hydrocodone (narcotic pain medication) 5/325 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet every 6 hours for pain at midnight, 6:00 A.M., noon and 6:00 P.M. Resident J's narcotic Controlled Drug Record for the Hydrocodone, dated October 2024, indicated he had not received the 4 scheduled doses on 10/25/2024 and the midnight dose on 10/26/2024. During an interview, on 11/1/2024 at 8:45 A.M., the Administrator indicated the resident should have received the medication. 2. The record for Resident L was completed on 10/31/2024 at 11:26 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, depression, dementia and chronic cluster headaches. Resident L's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were available and dispensed according to physician's orders for 3 out of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Residents M, L and C) Findings include: 1. The medical record for Resident M was reviewed on 10/30/2024 at 2:19 P.M. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, acute kidney failure, ventral hernia, urinary tract infection, frequent falls, depression, other artificial opening of the urinary tract, post-traumatic stress disorder, sepsis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. Physician Orders for Resident M included Mupirocin ointment 2% 1 application topically twice a day, dated 8/31/2024 until 10/30/2024, and Clonazepam 0.25 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day, dated 10/3/2024. The October MAR indicated Resident M did not receive Mupirocin as ordered on the following dates: 10/18/2024 Evening dose due to medication unavailable, 10/19/2024 Morning and evening doses due to medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antianxiety drug was not adiministered for an excessive duration for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services (Resident M). Finding includes: The medical record for Resident M was reviewed on 10/30/2024 at 2:19 P.M. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, acute kidney failure, ventral hernia, urinary tract infection, frequent falls, depression, other artificial opening of the urinary tract, post-traumatic stress disorder, sepsis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. Physician's Orders for Resident M included Ativan (an antianxiety medication) 2 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day as needed, initiated on 7/29/2024, and Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.25 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day, initiated on 10/3/2024. The PRN Clonazepam did not have a stop date for the medication use. A current Care Plan, reviewed 10/14/2024, indicated Resident M was at risk for drug related side effect due to psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents reviewed for medication use was free from significant medication errors related to omissions and overdosing/underdosing of antiseizure medications. (Resident E) Finding includes: A record review for Resident E was completed on 10/30/2024 at 2:07 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, severe intellectual disabilities, autistic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, and epilepsy. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/23/2024, indicated Resident E had severe cognitive disabilities and received medications of an antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant. Physician's Orders for medications included, but were not limited to: -Clobazam (anti-seizure medication) 20 milligrams at bedtime starting 8/29/2024, given in the morning from 8/17/24-8/28/24. -Fycompa (anti-seizure medication) 30milliters equals15milligrams at bedtime starting on 8/ 817/2024. -Lamotrigine (anti-epileptic medication) 200 milligrams 2 tabs twice daily starting 8/17/2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter equipment was positioned and maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter use. (Resident J) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/30/2024 at 11:41 A.M., Resident J's catheter tubing and urine collection bag was lying on the floor under his wheelchair. During an interview, on 10/30/2024 at 11:43 A.M., CNA 11 indicated the tubing and the drainage bag should not be on the floor. During an observation, on 10/31/2024 at 10:20 A.M., Resident J's urine collection bag was lying on the floor. During an observation, on 11/1/2024 at 9:10 A.M., Resident J was in the dining room with the urine collection bag lying on the floor. During an interview, on 10/30/2024 at 11:43 A.M., CNA 11 indicated the tubing and the drainage bag should not be on the floor. On 10/30/2024 at 11:59 A.M., Resident J was brought into the dining room with the urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag dragging on the floor. During an observation, on 10/30/2024 at 3:42 P.M., Resident J's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a removal of a PICC line (a peripherally inserted central catheter is a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) and resident discharge and failed to notify the physician of low blood glucose levels for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for physician notification. (Residents B & C). Findings include: 1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/4/2024 at 10:49 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, amputation of left lower leg, diabetes, hypertension, Bipolar disorder and infection of left lower stump. Resident B had been admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 8/28/2024. Physician Orders for Resident B, dated 8/21/2024, included Vancomycin (antibiotic) 1.5 gram/250 ml (milliliter) intravenous. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 8/22/2024, indicated a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) was inserted in the resident's right upper arm. A Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a transfer/discharge form was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident C) Finding includes: A record review for Resident C was completed on 10/4/2024 at 10: 37 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, fracture of the neck, lumbar and thoracic vertebra and right humerus. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/13/2024 at 1:14 A.M., indicated at 12:23 A.M., Resident C was transferred a to local hospital. Resident C was found unresponsive by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and when assessed by the nurse, Resident C was found to be cold, clammy, and with pupils non-reactive to light, labored breathing and weak hand grips. Resident C's blood sugar was 49 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/13/2024 at 3:17 A.M., indicated Resident C returned from the hospital. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/22/2024 at 12:04 P.M., indicated Resident C's left abdomen was swollen and firm with bruising to the right arm and had increased pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold form was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed transfer and discharge. (Resident C) Finding includes: A record review for Resident C was completed on 10/4/2024 at 10: 37 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, fracture of the neck, lumbar and thoracic vertebra and right humerus. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/22/2024 at 12:04 P.M., indicated Resident C's left abdomen was swollen and firm with bruising and the resident's right arm had increased pain and swelling. Resident C was transferred to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/22/2024 at 5:18 P.M., indicated Resident C was admitted to the hospital. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/22/2024 at 5:19 P.M., indicated Resident C would be transferred to another hospital for surgery due to a large hematoma. There was no documentation a bed hol form was sent by the facility to the hospital or provided to Resident C's Power of Attorney (POA) for either transfer. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to write an order to send a resident to the emergency room or have adequate orders in place for diabetes management, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident C) Finding includes: 1. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/13/2024 at 1:14 A.M., indicated at 12:23 A.M., Resident C was transferred a to local hospital. Resident C was found unresponsive by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and when assessed by the nurse, Resident C was found to be cold, clammy, their pupils were non-reactive to light, their breathing was labored and she had weak hand grips. Resident B's blood sugar was 49 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). A packet of sugar was administered to the resident with no change in her condition, except Resident C's blood sugar increased to 56 mg/dL. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/13/2024 at 3:17 A.M., indicated Resident C had returned from the hospital. The physician was notified, but an order was not written to send Resident C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dressing changes for a PICC (a peripherally inserted central catheter is a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) site for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident D) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/4/2024 at 11:00 A.M. The diagnoses included but not limited to: osteomyelitis, alcohol abuse with withdrawal, psychoactive substance abuse, malnutrition, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and patient non-compliance. The Physician Orders, included, but were not limited to: PICC line dressing changes every week. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 5/8/2024, indicated Resident D arrived at the facility with a PICC line in place. The May 2024 Medication Administration Record indicated Resident D received a PICC line dressing change on 5/17/2024, 5/24/2024, 5/31/2024 and 6/4/2024. A current Care Plan, initiated on 5/8/2024, indicated Resident D had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred, as ordered. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 6/11/24 at 12:46 P.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident C was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to; heart failure, end stage renal disease, insulin dependent diabetic and right hip fracture (prior to admission-due to a fall at home) and malnutrition. An Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated 4/3/24, indicated the resident had a self care deficit related to impaired physical functioning and medical conditions. The interventions included, but were not limited to: .provide the amount of assistance resident needs for completion of ADL care, dated 4/26/24, resident is non-weight bearing to right lower extremity . A Care Plan related to health related complications - hip fracture with complications of pressure ulcer, falls and pain, dated 4/3/24 had interventions including but not limited to .assist resident to T & R [turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident preferences related to bathing choices, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 48) Finding includes: During an interview, on 3/6/2024 at 2:47 P.M., Resident 48 indicated she received a shower every other week, and did receive bed baths, but would like a shower weekly at a minimum. A record review for Resident 48 was completed on 3/11/2024 at 8:48 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: quadriplegia, rheumatoid arthritis, and atrial fibrillation. A Care Plan, dated 1/18/2024 and updated 2/23/2024, indicated Resident 48 was limited in physical mobility, bedfast all or most of the time related to quadriplegia and muscle spasms, a required extensive assistance to full dependence on staff for mobility, transfers, toileting, and eating. A Social Service Initial History, dated 1/22/2024 at 9:40 A.M., indicated Resident 48 preferred to have a bathing performed in the morning three times a week. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/25/2024, indicated Resident 48 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete written notice of transfer or discharge was provided, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 23 and 49) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 3/8/2024 at 9:03 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: malignant neoplasm of the right breast, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, schizophrenia (7/18/2023), major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), restless leg syndrome, and insomnia. The record indicated the resident had no family or guardian and was her own responsible person. The Nursing Progress Notes for February 2024 indicated the resident had displayed episodes of daily mood instability, delusional behaviors, at times expressed suicidal ideation and had attempted to exit the building. The resident was discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital on 2/28/2024. There was no written notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of the bed hold policy form was provided, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 23, 48 and 49) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 3/8/2024 at 9:03 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: malignant neoplasm of the right breast, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, schizophrenia (7/18/2023), major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), restless leg syndrome, and insomnia. The record indicated the resident had no family or guardian and was her own responsible person. The Nursing Progress Notes for February 2024, indicated the resident had displayed episodes of daily mood instability, delusional behaviors, at times expressed suicidal ideations and had attempted to exit the building. The resident was discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital on 2/28/2024. There was no written notice of discharge or transfer located in the clinical record. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for activities was developed, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During the initial tour of the facility, on 3/6/2024 between 9:45 A.M. - 11:00 A.M., Resident 42 was observed seated in a high back wheelchair in the unit lounge. He was seated behind three large broda-type recliner chairs. The television in the room was turned on, but the volume was not very loud. Resident 42 was noted to be fiddling with the looped strap of the mechanical lift pad that was underneath him. Resident 42 was observed on 3/7/2024 from approximately 8:30 AM. - 11:14 A.M. He was in his wheelchair and was either located in the hallway across from the nurse's station or in the day lounge behind the large broda-type recliner chairs. The resident was noted to alternate between wakefulness and sleeping. Other than the television on a low volume in the day lounge, there was no activity provided to Resident 42. Resident 42 was observed on 3/8/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted timely, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 35) Finding includes: During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 35's spouse indicated she had not been invited to a care plan meeting in a long time. She could not recall the last time but, did know that one was not held this year. A record review was completed on 3/8/2024 at 2:00 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: aphasia following cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and left foot drop. The last documented care plan meeting in the electronic medical record indicated it was completed on 8/9/2023. A Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living Functional/rehabilitation status, dated 10/26/2023, included an intervention to invite the Resident and his family to care plan meetings. During an interview on 3/11/2024 at 10:39 A.M., the Social Service Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADL (activities of daily living assistance was provided, related to grooming and personal hygiene, for 2 out of 3 dependent residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Residents 22 & 35) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/6/2024 at 11:40 A.M., Resident 22 was in her bed. She had long jagged fingernails on both hands with a brown substance under them, and long facial hair under her chin. During observations on 3/7/2024 at 8:45 A.M., on 3/8/2024 at 9:31 A.M., and on 3/11/2024 at 8:49 A.M., Resident 22 was seated in the dining room eating her breakfast. Her fingernails were still long and jagged with a brown substance under them, and she still had long facial hair under her chin. A record review for Resident 22 was completed on 3/8/2024 at 1:30 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a person-centered activity program for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During the initial tour of the facility, on 3/6/2024 between 9:45 A.M. - 11:00 A.M., Resident 42 was observed seated in a high back wheelchair in the unit lounge. He was seated behind three large broda- type recliner chairs. The television in the room was turned on, but the volume was not very loud. Resident 42 was noted to be fiddling with the looped strap of the mechanical lift pad that was underneath him. Resident 42 was observed on 3/7/2024 from approximately 8:30 AM. - 11:14 A.M. He was in his wheelchair and was either located in the hallway across from the nurse's station or in the day lounge behind the large broda-type recliner chairs. The resident was noted to alternate between wakefulness and sleeping. Other than the television on a low volume in the day lounge, there was no activity provided to Resident 42. Resident 42 was observed on 3/8/2024 8:30 A.M., seated in his wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide transportation to essential medical appointments as scheduled for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion and failed to identify and monitor a bruising for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents 35 & 22) Findings include: 1. On 3/6/2024 at 10:00 A.M., a family member who was standing in hallway, was overheard complaining that her husband had missed appointments in the past, and she was worried there was no transportation set up for the next week for his scheduled appointments. During an interview and observation on 3/6/2024 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 35's spouse indicated he had missed an appointment in January 2024. The appointments, scheduled every 12 weeks, were for Botox injections to his left leg, which was helping him. During an interview, on 3/11/2024 at 9:21 A.M., Resident 35 indicated he had missed his appointment in January and as a result,, had increased pain in his leg and felt his progress in moving his knee had slowed. He indicated in the past, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a splint and brace were applied as ordered, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited range of motion. (Resident 35) Finding includes: During an interview and observation on 3/6/2024 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 35 and his spouse indicated he did not wear a splint on his left hand and ankle. He indicated when he was in therapy, they used to put splints on, but no one put them on him currently. During an interview and observation on 3/7/2024 at 10:52 A.M., Resident 35's left ankle was contracted inward, resting against the footboard of the bed. He and his wife indicated staff used to put on a brace (to his left ankle) but had stopped when his therapy had ended. Staff were also not applying any splints to his hand. During an interview and observation on 3/11/2024 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 35 was not wearing any splint or brace. He indicated he had not worn a hand splint or ankle brace during the past weekend. A record review was completed on 3/8/2024 at 2:00 P.M. for Resident 35. His diagnoses included, but were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for the use of a Foley (indwelling urinary catheter) catheter, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 26) Finding includes: During an interview on 3/7/2024 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 26 indicated she had a Foley catheter when admitted to the facility. A record review was completed on 3/11/2024 at 10:16 A.M. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: multiple sclerosis, overactive bladder, and constipation. A Hospital Progress Note, dated 3/12/2024, indicated Resident 26 possibly had a neurogenic bladder. An admission Observation, dated 1/16/2024 at 10:29 P.M., indicated Resident 26 was incontinent of urine with the inability to recognize to void, and had an indwelling urinary catheter in place. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/23/2024, indicated Resident 26 was incontinent of bladder. A Nurse's Note, dated 2/5/2024 at 1:44 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address a Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendations timely, related to significant weight loss, for 1 of 3 reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 22) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 22 was completed on 3/8/2024 at 1:30 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. An RD Progress Note, dated 8/28/2023, indicated Resident 22 had a significant weight loss in 30 days of 6.6%. She consumed a regular diet and ate an average of 50% of her meals with some refusals documented. Resident 22's weights were as follows: 8/25/2023 - 125.4 pounds (#), 7/26/2023 133#, 6/2/2023- 132.6#, 5/4/2023- 128#, and 1/3/2023- 120#. The RD recommendations, on 8/28/2023, were to add fortified foods with the meals and to continue monitoring intakes, labs, weight, skin, and medications. An RD Progress Note, dated 9/17/2023, indicated Resident 22 continued to have a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to pharmacy recommendations timely, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. (Resident 2) Finding includes: During the initial tour of the facility, on 3/6/2024 between 9:45 A.M. - 11:00 A.M., Resident 2 was observed lying in his bed asleep. The resident was noted to be very thin with severely contracted wrists. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 3/8/24 at 10:23 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, insomnia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder and depression. The current Physician's Orders for medications for Resident 2 included the following: - aripiprazole tablet (an antipsychotic medication) 20 mg (milligrams) tablet, one tablet once a day, and aripiprazole 5 mg, one tablet once a day. There were instructions to give the two tablets together to equal 25 mg of aripiprazole to treat the resident's Bipolar disorder. - citalopram tablet (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a Physician's Order for the use of Ativan (anti-anxiety medication), and limit an Ativan as needed (prn) order to 14 days, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 49) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 49 was completed on 3/8/2024 at 8:55 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm, and hemiplegia of the non-dominant left side. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/2024, indicated Resident 49 was cognitively intact. He received an antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications. Resident 49 had moods of feeling down, depressed, or hopeless for 12-14 days of 14 days reviewed; trouble falling asleep or sleeping too much for 12-14 days of 14 days reviewed; feeling tired or having little energy for 12-14 days of 14 days reviewed; trouble concentrating on things, such as newspaper or watching television for 12-14 days of 14 days reviewed; and moving or speaking slowly that other people could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an anticoagulant medication was continued upon readmission after hospitalization, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication use. (Resident 48). Finding includes: During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 2:57 P.M., Resident 48's husband indicated Resident 48 was to be receiving Heparin (anticoagulant) related to a hospitalization for blood clots. A record review was completed on 3/11/2024 at 8:48 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: quadriplegia, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, and history of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/25/2024, indicated Resident 48 was receiving an anticoagulant. A Physician's Order, dated 1/18/2024, indicated Resident 48 received Heparin (anticoagulant medication) 5,000 units per milliliter twice daily from 1/18/2024-2/9/2024. A Hospital Progress Note, dated 2/8/2024, indicated lifelong anticoagulation would be needed per hematology. A Physician Progress Note, dated 2/14/2024, indicated Eliquis would be needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide accommodations for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. (Resident B) Finding includes: A clinical record review was completed on 2/14/2023 at 2:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, right femur, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and [NAME]-Danlos syndrome. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 1/16/2023 indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. She had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others that significantly disrupted care or the living environment for 1 to 3 days of the 14-day assessment period. She was occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. She was able to make herself understood and understand others. The assessment indicated it was very important for Resident B to take care of her personal belongings and to have snacks available between meals. A Nurse's Note on 11/2/2022 at 4:48 P.M., by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were in place for 1 of 22 Residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 27) Finding includes: A clinical record was reviewed for Resident 27 on 2/14/2023 at 9:43 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: anxiety disorder, dementia, lack of coordination and difficulty walking. A skin event was initiated on 2/2/2023 for a skin tear to the peri-area. A Physician Order, dated, 2/2/2023, indicated apply antibiotic ointment, skin tear to peri-area until healed, once a day. Resident 27's medical record indicated no skin integrity or an acute care plan for the skin tear was in place. During an interview, on 2/14/2023 at 12:58 P.M., the MDS Nurse indicated that she does not see a care plan for skin integrity or for the skin tear on 2/2/2023 and there should have been one. On 2/16/2023 at 8:03 A.M., the Director of Nursing provided a policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 7/19/2018, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for 1 out of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 27) Finding includes: A clinical record was reviewed for Resident 27 on 2/14/2023 at 9:43 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: anxiety disorder, dementia, lack of coordination and difficulty walking. During an observation, on 2/9/2023 at 2:35 P.M., the resident was awake in bed, her bed was next to the wall and a bed bolster along the side you would exit the bed, a hoyer pad was sitting in a broda chair. A Physician Order, dated 1/25/2023, indicated utilize mechanical lift for transfers every shift, day, evening, night. Resident 27's medical record did not indicate she was using a bed bolster on her bed. During an interview, on 2/14/2023 at 10:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the bed bolster was used to define the edges of the bed. She did not see any documentation for the bed bolster in the medical record or when it was initiated and there should have been. The bed bolster was put in place as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for blood sugars indicated in an order for less than 100 milligrams per deciliter for 1 of 3 residents reviewd for insulin administration. (Resident 157) Finding includes: During an initial interview on 2/10/2023 at 11:22 A.M., Resident 157 indicated he received insulin injections. A clinical record review was completed on 2/13/2023 at 9:14 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, generalized anxiety, and hypertension. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 1/20/2023 indicated Resident 157 received insulin injections for 7 days of the 7 days look back period. Physician Orders indicated Resident 157 received: 1. Lantus U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) solution 100 units/milliliter with 45 units injected subcutaneously daily. 2. Lispro 300 units/3 milliliter with 12 units injected subcutaneously before meals. 3. Humalog 300 units/3 milliliter sliding scale to be injected subcutaneously as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide skin integrity assessments while an AFO (ankle foot orthotic) was in place to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Residents 33) Finding includes: On 2/10/2023 at 9:25 A.M., Resident 33 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room with an orthopedic sandal on his left foot. He indicated at this time during an interview, he has two sores on his heel and ankle. He indicated the staff took away his AFO when they determined the AFO was causing skin damage. A clinical record review was completed on 2/14/2023 at 10:27 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and emphysema. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 12/6/2022 indicated Resident 33 had an unstageable deep tissue injury. He required extensive assistance with two or more staff members for dressing. A Braden Scale was completed on 11/17/2022. The score indicated Resident 33 was at mild risk for skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the prescribed supplementation for a resident with significant weight loss and document consumption of prescribed supplementation for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 1) Finding includes: A clinical record review was completed on 2/13/2023 at 11:22 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 12/20/2022 indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance with one staff member for eating. He had no weight loss and had an unstageable pressure ulcer present on admission. A Dietician note on 10/13/2022 indicated Resident 1's current body weight was 91.5 pounds. He had a body mass index of 16.28. He was prescribed Boost High Protein shakes daily, and a new order for health shakes three times daily with meals was obtained. The Dietician Note then indicated, .Will recommend to discontinue health shake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly store the resident's C-PAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory devices. (Resident 33) Finding includes: During an observation on 2/9/2023 at 10:14 A.M. and 2:25 P.M., Resident 33's C-PAP mask was lying across his made bed. On 2/10/2023, the C-PAP mask was placed in the upper nightstand drawer without any protection. During an interview, Resident 33 indicated the mask and tubing for the C-PAP does not get cleaned regularly. On 2/13/2023 the C-PAP mask was observed lying across the C-PAP machine on the nightstand. A clinical record review was completed on 2/14/2023 at 10:27 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and emphysema. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 12/6/2022 indicated Resident 33 had a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. A Care Plan developed on 2/12/2021, and revised on 12/20/2022, indicated Resident 33 had a diagnosis of COPD, emphysema, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were dated/labeled and store pots, mixing bowls, and colanders in a sanitary manner. Findings include: During a brief tour of the kitchen on 2/9/2023 between 9:35 and 9:55 A.M., observed in the walk- in refrigerator 4 dessert cups with fresh fruit uncovered, sausage gravy, brown gravy, scrambled eggs, cinnamon rolls, applesauce in containers with no date/label, 2 open gallons of chocolate milk and quart of lactose free milk undated, one pound of butter half gone wrap in plastic and dry parmesan cheese open in plastic bag undated. During an interview, on 2/9/2023 at 9:53 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated that anything that is opened needs to be labeled with the date open and the date it expires. During another tour of the kitchen on 9/16/2023 at 8:55 A.M., observed pots, mixing bowls and colanders on a bottom open shelf approximately 8 inches from the floor not inverted, with visible crumbs, grit and dust when hand swept across the shelf. During an interview, on 2/16/2023 at 8:57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/01/2014 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/23/2023 |
| BEVERS, SUSAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| FISH, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| GILLILAND, TERRENCE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| HARPE, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| KLEBER, COURTNEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MANN, DEBORAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/10/2014 |
| MARKEL, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MCCORY, JACK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| REEDY, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| SMITH, RICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| STOREY, MARC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ASBR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2018 |
| HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| LP BREMEN MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| BLIMLING, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2024 |
| GETTINGER, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| HARRISON, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| HOUCK, JARED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2024 |
| LEHNER, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| LEWIS, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2024 |
| MOORE, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/12/2024 |
| RAPP, ROLAND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| REVELETTE, BARBARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/17/2022 |
| SMEDRA, IRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| STEIER III, ELMER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| STIGLER, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| SYER, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| WINTNER, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| LP BREMEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/26/2025 |
| SHC MEDICAL PARTNERS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| SHC MEDICAL PARTNERS OF INDIANA, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2020 |
| SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| STAKEHOLDER PAYROLL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| DOYLE, MARIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 61 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.