No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Signature Healthcare Of Terre Haute

3500 Maple Ave, Terre Haute, IN 47804 · For profit - Corporation · 176 certified beds · (812) 238-1555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$66,207 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $66,207 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2215 6th Ave · (800) 622-3602 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
焼山中央2丁目9-40 · +81823365838 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3250 N 25th St · (812) 236-1145 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.7%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.4%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.7%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.8%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.441.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.941.441.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
15.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.1%CMS range 35.9–53.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF15.4%CMS range 12.3–18.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.1–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.06
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
54.9%
Total nursing turnover
57.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 118.9 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-09-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident residing on the same locked unit for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents B and C) resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy when the facility failed to keep the residents separated and prevent further abuse. The immediate jeopardy began on 9/22/24 when a cognitive impaired resident (Resident B) was observed by staff touching another cognitively impaired resident (Resident C) in the genital region in the common area after breakfast. Later that same day, Residents B and C were found together in bed with Resident B's hand was on Resident C's bare stomach and legs intertwined. In the afternoon, Residents B and C were observed in another resident's room with Resident B's pants down without a brief and his back turned towards the door and his hands on Resident C's shoulders. The Administrator (ADM) was notified of the immediate jeopardy at 4:45 p.m. on 9/25/24. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, a facility staff member failed to follow a resident's plan-of-care intervention requiring the use of a gait belt for transfers, which resulted in a resident fall with fracture that required a hospital visit and follow-up care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident C). The deficient practice was corrected by 5/11/26 after the facility implemented a systemic plan and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: During an interview on 5/20/26 at 1:09 p.m., Resident C indicated he fell during a transfer when CNA 2 snatched him up by the back of his pants, real quick. She did not use a gait belt as other staff had done. He lost his balance and fell to the floor, landing on his left side. He indicated he had no use of that arm afterward and was in pain. The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 5/20/26 at 11:25 a.m. Diagnoses included hemiparesis (neurological condition caused by brain damage that causes partial weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side, need for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-05-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident specific interventions were implemented for a dementia resident who was known to have behaviors upon admitting to the facility and intrusive wandering for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident J). This deficient practice resulted in harm when Resident J wandered into Resident F's room unsupervised and then exited with three circular bruises on the right lower arm and scratches with fresh blood on them. Resident F was found on the ground of her room with skin tears, and was diagnosed at the hospital with a non-displaced acute distal right clavicle fracture, and a subdural hematoma with mild midline shift. Findings include: A confidential interview during the survey indicated that local police responded to a nearby hospital to speak with Resident F who was being treated for injuries that occurred at the nursing home. The resident died on [DATE]. There was concern that the deceased resident had been beaten by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify responsible party of changes of condition and physician notifications for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for notification (Resident Q). B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified when medications were unavailable to administer as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident L). Findings include:A. On 3/02/26 at 12:47 p.m., during a phone interview Resident Q's daughter indicated she and her sister were durable power of attorney (POA) with healthcare and neither of them had been notified of changes in their mother's condition, medication changes, or of an incident when the resident had fallen in her room. On 3/3/26 at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident Q was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure critical abnormal lab results were reported to the physician in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for labs (Resident D) and failed to obtain STAT (immediate) labs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for labs (Resident Q). Findings include:1. On 3/5/26 at 1:00 p.m., the medical record of Resident D was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and required maximum assistance from the staff for daily care needs. The most recent hospital stay was on 6/28/25. The resident was sent to the emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preference for his meals was met for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for food and food preferences (Resident J). Findings include:During the initial pool interview, on 3/2/26 at 3:30 p.m., Resident J indicated he had requested more food with his meals, but they had not been giving him bigger portions. He had requested this quite a while back, but they still just gave him the regular small amounts. He got hungry in between his meals. During the lunch meal observation, on 3/5/26 at 12:06 p.m., Resident J's lunch tray was observed. Double portions were not observed, in the resident's meal tray, when compared to a regular portion meal tray. Observation of the resident's meal ticket lacked documentation that double portions were to be served. At the same time, the Dietary Manager observed the order as written in the resident's diet orders. She indicated she needed to check the resident's diet orders as they presented in the kitchen. Resident J's record was reviewed on 3/5/26 at 1:50 p.m. The profile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to development and implement a baseline care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for admission. (Resident B)Findings include:A clinical record review for Resident B was completed on 12/9/25 at 10:29 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD), need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus II, atrial fibrillation, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, altered mental status, and history of stroke. The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 3:51 a.m., following an acute care hospital stay. The clinical record lacked a nursing admission assessment and development of a baseline care plan until the afternoon on 3/17/25. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 9:46 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she had not found documentation regarding Resident B's admission in the clinical record. The resident's baseline care plan was not completed in a timely manner. There had been no documented physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident had quality of care when staff failed to complete a nursing admission assessment, wound assessments, and admission orders for two respiratory medications and a urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for admission. (Resident B) Findings include: A clinical record review for Resident B was completed on 12/9/25 at 10:29 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus II, atrial fibrillation, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, altered mental status, and history of stroke. The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 3:51 a.m., following an acute care hospital stay. The clinical record lacked a nursing admission assessment including vital signs, skin assessment, and catheter assessment. A review of the resident's progress notes lacked nursing documentation regarding the resident's arrival to the facility. The record lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect changes in regard to a resident's access to smoking for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident B). Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 11/5/25 at 10:44 a.m. Diagnoses included nicotine dependence and major depressive disorder. His smoking status on his profile page included current everyday smoker. A current health care plan, dated 5/19/22 and edited 10/9/25, indicated the resident chose to smoke and was a risk for injury related to smoking. The resident had been evaluated and was deemed a safe smoker. Interventions included, but was not limited to, the following: resident must be at dining room door to enter courtyard on time in order to participate in supervised smoking breaks; resident will be allowed two cigarettes, or 15 minutes per smoking pass; resident will smoke in designated area in courtyard of southwest of building; smoking/tobacco material will be made available to resident by facility staff at designated smoke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained for psychotropic medications for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 8, 11, 5, 99, and 103). The deficient practice was corrected on 9/9/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:1. Resident 8's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 11:48 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/20/25, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and received an antipsychotic (treats psychosis), antianxiety (treats anxiety), anticonvulsant (treats seizures and can be used as mood stabilizers), and antidepressant (treats depression) medication during the look-back period. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder unspecified, major depressive disorder recurrent and mild, and bipolar disorder (extreme…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were informed of the contact information regarding how to file a complaint with the State (the government entity responsible for inspecting and certifying long-term care facilities to ensure they meet federal and state health and safety standards for resident care) for 1 of 1 Resident Council interview and 3 of 3 months of Resident Council meeting minutes reviewed. Findings include:On 9/22/25 at 11:18 a.m., the Resident Council meeting minutes for June, July, and August 2025 were reviewed. The minutes lacked documentation that the Resident Council members had been informed of where to locate the information on how to file a complaint with the State. During the Resident Council interview, on 9/22/25 at 2:23 p.m., the President of the Resident Council indicated she was not sure what the process was for contacting the State if she had a complaint. She could not remember ever discussing that topic at the Resident Council meetings. At the same time, Resident 76 indicated he had never been informed about how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 4 of 27 residents MDS assessments reviewed (Residents 14, 15, 16, and 145). Findings include: 1. Resident 14's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 8:28 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (occurs when damage to the brain, spinal cord, or nerves disrupts the signals between bladder and the brain, leading to problems with bladder control) and urinary retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/25, indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of urine. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/24/25, indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of urine. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/22/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, had an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were initiated after falls for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 16). B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transport residents on the facility bus for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 132, 76, 145, and 65). Findings include:A. On 9/22/25 at 11:53 a.m., Resident 16 was observed lying in bed. The resident had a bariatric (wide) bed with borders on the mattress and the head and the foot with a gap in the middle of the mattress. There were non-skid strips on the floor at the head and foot of the bed, however there were no non-skid strips in the center area, where the gap in the mattress borders was located. A body pillow was on a table. On 9/22/25 at 11:58 a.m., the Regional Clinical Consultant observed Resident 16's room. At the same time, the Regional Clinical Consultant acknowledged the non-skid strips were missing in the middle area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of high blood sugars for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 6). Findings include:On 9/17/25 at 11:04 a.m., during an initial observation and interview, Resident 6 indicated he had elevated blood sugar (BS) levels due to infections and repeated urinary tract infections. On 9/22/25 at 2:30 p.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DNS) indicated prior to 8/24/25 the parameter for notification for Resident 6 was to notify the physician of a BS over 400. She provided a copy of the physician order, dated 10/30/23, indicating to notify the physician of BS over 400. The DON acknowledged the order had not been brought forward under the physician's orders. The DON acknowledged a BS reading above 400 or a BS reading of HI should be reported to the physician immediately. The article, Diabetes, dated 5/15/24, was retrieved on 9/22/25 from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) website at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects for residents who received antipsychotic medications for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 8, 5, and 99). The deficient practice was corrected on 8/8/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance Findings include: 1. Resident 8's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 11:48 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels, characterized by periods of mania and depression) unspecified. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/20/25, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and received an antipsychotic (treats psychosis) medication during the look-back period. An admission observation, dated 2/22/25, indicated the resident had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy review of resident medications were completed quarterly and failed to ensure the physician was notified of recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 5). Findings include:On 9/19/25 at 10:16 a.m., the medical record of Resident 5 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnosis included, but not limited to, depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities that you normally enjoy, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities, for at least two weeks), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). On 5/12/25 a pharmacy recommendation suggested the following labs for medication monitoring:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 3 of 6 residents (Resident 26, 3, and 152) observed during the medication pass. There were 27 opportunities for error observed with 3 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.1 percent. Findings include:1. On 9/18/25 at 9:24 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 7 prepared and administered medication to Resident 26. The medication included propranolol (treats high blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth. Resident 26's record was reviewed on 9/22/25 at 10:04 a.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, essential, primary hypertension (high blood pressure). A physician's order, dated 8/28/25 and discontinued on 9/15/25, indicated propranolol 20 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily for coronary artery disease. A physician's order, dated 9/15/25, indicated propranolol 10 mg, give 2 tablets by mouth twice daily coronary artery disease. On 9/19/25 at 10:25 a.m., the Regional Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during direct patient care services for 3 of 3 random resident observations. (Residents 1,102, and 8). B. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) tubing was kept off the floor for 1 of 2 reviewed for catheter use (Resident 14). Findings include:A1. On 9/23/25 at 11:57 a.m., observed Registered Nurse (RN) 10 washing her hands. The RN turned off the faucet with her bare hand and then dried her hands on a paper towel. The nurse then donned (put on) gloves and picked up the glucometer device from the resident's dresser. On 9/23/25 at 11:59 a.m., observed RN 10 lay glucometer device (a small, portable device that measures the amount of glucose (sugar) in your blood) on the bed of Resident 1. After completing the procedure, she laid the glucometer on the resident's dresser.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, a facility dietary staff member failed to don gloves prior to handling sandwich bread during preparation of sandwiches during an initial tour of the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 of 10 residents consuming the prepared sandwiches. Findings include: An observation of the facility's kitchen was completed on 8/4/25 at 10:10 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager. Dietary Aide 2 was observed standing at a preparation table with bread laid out in a row. He held one piece of bread in a bare hand and had a knife with peanut butter in the other. He began to spread peanut butter onto the piece of bread. Dietary Aide 2 indicated he was preparing peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for lunch service and for snacks during the day. He indicated he should be wearing gloves and not touching food with his bare hands. He began to don gloves, when he was stopped by the Dietary Manager and asked to perform hand hygiene prior to donning the gloves.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 11:03 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer scheduled doses of comfort medication per physician order without nursing assessment and physician notification for 1 of 8 resident reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). The deficient practice was corrected by 6/5/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: During a telephone interview on 6/12/25 at 3:20 p.m., Resident B's family member indicated the staff were not able to explain needs or symptoms that would be managed with the hospice ordered medications. They appeared confused about the administration of the medications and when they were to be given. The residents breathing would become rapid at times and he would begin to move his shoulders and grunt as if he were uncomfortable. When the medications were given, he seemed more comfortable and seemed to breath easier. One Qualified Medication aide (QMA) had entered the room and attempted to administer his medications, but indicated he was clenching his teeth and she was not able to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of suspected resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for resident abuse (Resident F). Findings include: A facility reportable incident (FRI), dated [DATE] at 11:51 a.m., indicated Resident F was attempting to ambulate in her room in the memory care and fell. Resident F complained of right shoulder and bilateral lower extremities pain. The resident was transported by ambulance to the emergency room (ER) where she was diagnosed with a non-displaced acute distal right clavicle fracture, diffuse osteopenia, and a subdural hematoma with mild midline shift. A confidential concern during the survey indicated that local police responded to a nearby hospital to speak with Resident F who was being treated for injuries that occurred at the nursing home. The resident died on [DATE]. There was concern that the deceased resident had been beaten by another resident. A concern from a local hospital employee, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to issue a 30-day notice of discharge prior to the planned date of a facility-initiated discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharges (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview, on 3/14/25 at 9:30 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 indicated she was working the unit Resident B resided on. He was discharging from the facility today, but she was not sure what time. QMA 5 indicated she was not sure where the resident planned to discharge, but the Social Services Director (SSD) should know. During an observation, on 3/14/25 at 9:33 a.m., Resident B was lying in bed with 3.5 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula, and a catheter drainage bag was hanging on the side of the bed. At the same time, the resident indicated they have something planned but was unable to say what when asked if he planned to discharge from the facility that day. The resident did not know the year or who the president was. The resident's facial hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to plan for, and ensure the resident was prepared for, a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for a resident with significant clinical needs including catheter care, oxygen use, and wound care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharges (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview, on 3/14/25 at 9:30 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 indicated she was working the unit Resident B resided on. He was discharging from the facility today, but she was not sure what time. QMA 5 indicated she was not sure where the resident planned to discharge, but the Social Services Director (SSD) should know. During an observation, on 3/14/25 at 9:33 a.m., Resident B was lying in bed with 3.5 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula, and a catheter drainage bag was hanging on the side of the bed. At the same time, the resident indicated they have something planned but was unable to say what when asked if he planned to discharge from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse when a resident was called a derogatory name by a staff member for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident E). The deficient practice was corrected on 12/28/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) Incident Report was dated 12/27/24 at 4:33 a.m. The report indicated the staff called the Administrator and alleged verbal abuse by contract staff Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 towards Resident E. LPN 4 and Resident E exchanged inappropriate remarks. Immediate actions included resident separated from LPN 4 and taken to her room with another staff member, another staff nurse notified, Administrator notified, Administrator suspended LPN 4 via phone, LPN 4 left the facility without incident, the resident's physician, responsible party, and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified. The facility's incident investigation file included the following witness statements. A witness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an incident of verbal abuse from a nurse to a resident was reported to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) accurately for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident E). Findings include: An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) Incident Report was dated 12/27/24 at 4:33 a.m. The report indicated the staff called the Administrator and alleged verbal abuse by contract staff Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 towards Resident E. LPN 4 and Resident E exchanged inappropriate remarks. Immediate actions included resident separated from LPN 4 and taken to her room with another staff member, another staff nurse notified, Administrator notified, Administrator suspended LPN 4 via phone, LPN 4 left the facility without incident, the resident's physician, responsible party, and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified. The follow-up, dated 1/2/25, indicated upon investigation the abuse allegation was unsubstantiated. The facility's incident investigation file included the following witness statements. A witness statement from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Transfer/Discharge forms were completed and provided to residents and/or their representatives for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 18, 165, 138, and 54). Findings include: 1. Resident 18's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:25 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly damages memory and thinking skills, eventually leading to dementia). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and had exhibited behavioral symptoms directed towards others. A discharge, return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had been discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital. The census indicated that the resident had been hospitalized from [DATE] through [DATE]. A progress note, dated [DATE] at 10:46 a.m., indicated the resident had been diagnosed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bed hold forms were completed and provided to residents and/or their representatives for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 18, 165, and 138). Findings include: 1. Resident 18's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:25 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly damages memory and thinking skills, eventually leading to dementia). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and had exhibited behavioral symptoms directed towards others. A discharge, return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had been discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital. The census indicated that the resident had been hospitalized from [DATE] through [DATE]. A progress note, dated [DATE] at 10:46 a.m., indicated the resident had been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of not administering medications as ordered for 2 of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 76 and 74). Findings include: 1. On 1/23/25 at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 76 was reviewed. Diagnoses included but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), dilated cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle), heart failure (a condition in which your heart's main pumping chamber becomes stiff and unable to fill properly), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness. It might cause you to sweat, feel restless and tense, and have a rapid heartbeat. It can be a normal reaction to stress), schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions), major depressive disorder (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (a person who serves as an advocate for patients and consumers) had been notified of resident transfers from the facility, in the month of [DATE], for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 18, 165, and 138). Findings include: 1. Resident 18's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:25 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly damages memory and thinking skills, eventually leading to dementia). The census indicated that the resident had been hospitalized from [DATE] through [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and had exhibited behavioral symptoms directed towards others. A discharge, return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had been discharged to an inpatient psychiatric hospital. The record lacked documentation that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the QMAs (qualified medication aides) followed proper standards of practice for 1 of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 92). Findings include: Resident 92's record was reviewed, on 1/23/25 at 11:06 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), pressure ulcer (injury to skin an underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on skin) of right buttock, sacral region, left buttock, stage 3, and skin tear/laceration to left heel. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and had 3 stage 3 pressure ulcers. A care plan, dated 8/1/22, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent new pressure wounds on 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure wounds (Resident 131). Findings include: On 1/21/25 at 3:13 p.m., during an initial observation Resident 131 was lying in bed on the right side on a low air loss mattress. No off-loading heel boots were observed on bilateral feet. On 1/22/25 at 9:48 a.m., during a routine observation the resident was lying in bed on her right side on a low air loss mattress. No offloading boots were observed. Boots were in the wheelchair next to the bed. On 1/23/25 at 11:00 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed on her right side on a low air loss mattress. No offloading boots were observed on bilateral feet. On 1/24/25 at 11:30 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed on her right side. No offloading boots to bilateral feet observed. Boots were in the wheelchair next to the bed. On 1/24/25 at 12:10 p.m., the medical record of Resident 131 was reviewed. Diagnosis included but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration for 2 of 32 residents reviewed for hydration and nutrition (Residents 131 and 109). Findings include: 1. On 1/21/25 at 3:14 p.m., during an initial observation, Resident 131 was lying in bed on her right side. Skin and mouth were observed dry. A styrofoam cup with a small amount of brown liquid was observed inside on the overbed table next to the wall, which was outside of the resident's reach. On 1/22/25 at 9:48 a.m., during a routine observation, Resident 131 was lying in bed on her right side. An empty styrofoam cup was on the bedside overbed table. Resident tried to drink from the cup. On 1/24/25 at 2:00 p.m., during a general observation, Resident 131 was lying in bed on her right side. A partially melted cup of ice cream and a styrofoam cup with a small amount of water were on the overbed table. On 1/27/25 at 3:17 p.m., Resident 131 was lying in bed. Overbed table was next to the wall on the far side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated when changed and was maintained and stored in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory (Resident 26). Findings include: During an observation, on 1/22/25 at 9:36 a.m., Resident 26 was asleep in his bed. His oxygen concentrator (a medical device that separates nitrogen from the air to provide oxygen-enriched air for breathing) was on, and his nasal cannula (a medical device that supplies oxygen to a patient through their nose) was in his nose. The resident's oxygen tubing was undated, and no storage bag was observed. During an observation, on 1/23/25 at 2:17 p.m., the resident was sleeping in his bed. The oxygen concentrator was running, and his nasal cannula was observed out of his nose, un-bagged, and laying inside of his trash can next to his bed. There was visible trash items in the trash can along with his nasal cannula. His oxygen tubing was undated, and no storage bag was observed. During an observation, on 1/24/25 at 10:02 a.m., the resident was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessments were completed for 1 of 5 residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 92). Findings include: Resident 92's record was reviewed, on 1/23/25 at 11:06 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterizer by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was on anti-psychotic and anti- depressant medication. A care plan, dated 8/15/22, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of insomnia and anxiety and is at risk for drug related symptoms due to use of psychotropic medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated with the date medications were opened and stored in 4 of 5 medication administration carts observed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: 1. On 1/27/25 at 9:00 a.m., an observation of the medication administration cart on 400 hall with QMA 18. The following was observed. Resident 66 had a physician order, dated 10/18/24, for Admelog U-100 Insulin lispro (insulin lispro) solution; 100 unit/mL (milliliter) administer injection per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime for diagnosis of diabetes. Multi dose insulin vial was opened and undated. 2. On 1/27/25 at 9:10 a.m., the 300-hall medication administration cart was observed with the Director of Nursing (DNS). Resident 2 had a physician order, dated 12/30/24, for Basaglar KwikPen U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) administer 30 units subcutaneous (under the skin) once daily for diagnosis of diabetes. Basaglar insulin pen was opened and undated. Resident 111 had a physician order, dated 1/8/25, for Lantus SoloStar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure post fall assessmetns and vitals were completed for 72 hours post fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident P). Findings include: On 11/13/24 at 1:00 p.m., the facility list of falls was reviewed, it was noted Resident P slid from his wheelchair in his room resulting in the resident being found on the floor next to his wheelchair on 9/3/24. A progress note, dated 9/3/24 at 3:19 p.m., indicated Resident P was observed to be on the floor on the left side of his wheelchair. The resident was found to be incontinent of urine. No injuries noted after skin sweep (skin assessment). Vital signs were obtained, and the resident was lifted off the floor with the assistance of 3 staff. The note indicated that family and doctor were notified. An IDT (interdisciplinary team) note, dated 9/4/24 at 9:56 a.m., indicated they had discussed Resident P's fall and the root cause was determined to be urinary incontinence and an intervention to toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assist the resident in transportation from the facility to a physician office appointment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transportation (Resident C). Findings include: On 11/12/24 at 11:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident C was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnosis included but not limited to, diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), osteomyelitis (a painful bone infection that causes inflammation and swelling in the bone) of bilateral heels (both heels), hypertension (high blood pressure), functional quadriplegia (a condition that causes a person to be completely unable to move due to a severe disability or frailty from another medical condition). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and the resident required maximum assistance for daily care needs including physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator and/or designee and to the Indiana Department of Health for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse (Resident B and C). Findings include: On 9/24/24 at 10:29 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) help desk email correspondence with the DON, dated 9/19/24, 9/23/24, and 9/24/24. The DON indicated she had an abuse incident about Resident B and Resident C that she was trying to input into the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) facility reported incident record (FRI) system but kept getting an error message. She had emailed the IDOH help desk, on 9/19/24 and emailed the help desk again on 9/24/24 at 10:05 a.m., and indicated in the email, .My updates from last 3 reportables and reportable from Sunday (9/22/24) is not even on my list today to follow up on. When I sent my reply, I thought they were complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident abuse was investigated for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for investigating abuse allegations (Resident B and C). Findings include: During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 10:29 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she had an incident that she was trying to input into the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) facility reported incident record (FRI) system about Resident B and Resident C. Resident B was going around and leading Resident C by the hand. Resident C had on a gold belt buckle that Resident B kept trying to touch the buckle. Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 5 and CNA 6, thought Resident B was being inappropriate with Resident C and Resident B was touching Resident C's private area. DON contacted the Administrator (ADM), Social Services (SS), and the behavioral health services. The behavioral health services staff called back and changed Resident B's medication order for Xanax (medication used to treat anxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide personalized care and interventions for a resident (Resident F) with the diagnoses of schizophrenia (serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave) and behaviors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for behavior management which resulted in Resident F having resident to resident altercations with 4 cognitively impaired residents residing on the same locked unit (Residents B, G, H, and J). Findings include: During the survey a document titled, All About Me, undated, was observed in Resident F's room. The document described the resident's likes and dislikes, such as her favorite hobbies, food, movies, snacks, etc. Her dislikes included when people touched her without letting her know and when people tried to make her eat when she didn't want to eat. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 7/30/24 at 1:43 p.m. Resident F was [AGE] years old and resided in the facility's secured behavioral unit. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen nebulizer tubing, and equipment were dated, timed, and signed for 1of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident F). Findings include: On 4/3/24 at 1:50 p.m., during a routine room observation, Resident F's nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) mask and tubing were unbagged. Tubing was dated 1/25/24 and a clear liquid was within the nebulizer medication cup. On 4/3/24 at 1:55 p.m., during an interview, Resident F indicated he used half of the solution and leaves the other half for later. He used the nebulizer treatment a few times a week. On 4/3/24 at 2:00 p.m., during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) 4 indicated the nebulizer treatment order had been discontinued on March 6th. On 4/4/24 at 11:00 a.m., during a routine room observation, Resident F indicated the nebulizer machine had been removed. The resident indicated the nurse removed it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order and failed to notify physician of medications not being available to administer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident F). Findings include: On 4/3/24 at 11:31 a.m., during an observation and interview, Resident E indicated a nurse gave her 28 units of Trojeo insulin on 4/2/24. She only took 20 units because if she took the full dose her blood sugars bottomed out later in the day and early evening. She indicated she told the nurses she took 20 units, and the nurses reduced the dose to 20 units. On 4/3/24 at 12:00 p.m., the medical record for Resident E was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (kidney failure) dated 2/14/2024, anemia in chronic kidney disease (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells) dated 2/14/2024, atrial fibrillation an irregular heart rhythm (arrhythmia) that begins in the upper (atria) of your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and provided to1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, (Resident E). Findings include: On 4/3/24 at 11:31 a.m., during an observation and interview, Resident E indicated her medications and insulin were often late. She could not recall if insulin had been administered. On 4/3/24 at 12:00 p.m., the medical record for Resident E was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (kidney failure) dated 2/14/2024, anemia in chronic kidney disease (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells) dated 2/14/2024, atrial fibrillation an irregular heart rhythm (arrhythmia) that begins in the upper (atria) of your heart) dated 2/14/2024, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high) dated 2/14/2024, and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure) dated 2/14/24. Physician Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishware and silverware had adequate sanitation and did not have a hard water buildup during 1 of 2 kitchen observations, and failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed by staff when assisting two residents with eating during 1 of 2 dining observations (Residents 60 and 78). Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 12/11/23 at 10:00 a.m., a thick white cloudy substance was observed on multiple dishware of pellet bases, plate covers to the pellet bases, and silverware. The DM observed the white, cloudy substance and indicated, the dishware and silverware had a heavy lime buildup from the city water. The dishware needed to be run through the dishwasher again and the silverware needed to be soaked in the delime solution to help remove the lime buildup. On 12/14/23 at 10:40 a.m., the DM indicated, the dietary staff got the silverware cleaned by descaling in the power solution and the appliance and chemical maintenance company got the dishwasher and water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided showers as preferred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for choices (Resident C). Findings include: During an interview, on 12/12/23 at 9:35 a.m., Resident C indicated she was not receiving showers regularly. Resident C's record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 2:00 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, spina bifida (a congenital defect of the spine in which part of the spinal cord and its meninges are exposed through a gap in the backbone, often causing paralysis of the lower limbs). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/20/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial to maximal assistance for bathing and personal hygiene. A care plan, dated 8/11/22 and edited 10/25/23, indicated the resident was limited in mobility/functional status and required the use of a right sided enabler to aide in repositioning, transfers, and bed mobility. An intervention of the care plan included, but was not limited to, the resident required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident from exiting the facility unattended and crossing the street to a nearby house for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement (when a resident leaves a healthcare facility against medical advice) (Resident B). The deficient practice was corrected on 11/7/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore, past noncompliance. Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 11:14 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness (problems with memory, language or judgment), encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), and sequelae of cerebral infarction (residual effects or conditions produced after the acute phase of an illness or injury has ended). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit and experienced behaviors of rejection of care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure initial wound assessment documentation was completed in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wound documentation (Residents E and L). Findings include: 1. Resident E's record was reviewed on 8/1/23 at 9:08 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (paralysis below the neck that affects all of a person's limbs). The census indicated the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 5/26/23. A care plan, dated 5/25/23, indicated the resident was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue). A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 5/30/23, indicated the resident had a stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of the middle layer of skin of the body presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available from the Pharmacy for administration for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for available medications (Resident B and K). Findings include: 1. During a telephone interview with Resident B's family member, on 8/2/23 at 1:40 p.m., they indicated there had been many instances where the resident's medications had not been available to be administered, since his admission in January. The family would take the resident out of the facility for visits and had been told by the nursing staff that some of his medications were not available to send home with him. They had spoken to the previous Director of Nursing (DON) about this situation and how the resident could have behavior events if he did not receive the medication as ordered. On 7/17/23, they were told that he had been out of his mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication) for 3 days. The family had planned to take the resident out on this date, (8/2/23), and was told that he was out of his Clariton (a medication that relieves symptoms of sneezing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and equipment sanitation was completed during medication administration for 3 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident H, M, and N). Findings include: On 8/1/23 at 12:10 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 was observed entering Resident H's room to obtain the resident's blood glucose (the main sugar found in blood) reading. The resident was in contact isolation precautions (precautions to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-a germ that does not get better with the type of antibiotics that usually cure staph infections) in a wound. A sign on the door to the room indicated a gown, gloves and mask were to be put on prior to entering the room for any contact with the resident. The nurse put on gloves and a face mask before entering the room. The nurse placed the glucometer (a device used to measure the amount of glucose in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$66,207 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $21,083 — penalty dated 2024-09-27
  • $45,124 — penalty dated 2023-12-19
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-23 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.9-1.9 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Danville Centre for Health & RehabilitationDanville, KY 1 of 5Liberty Care & Rehabilitation CenterLiberty, KY 1 of 5Mayfair ManorLexington, KY 1 of 5Signature Health Of Portland Rehab & Wellness CentPortland, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of BremenBremen, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ErinErin, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of MuncieMuncie, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Putnam CountyCookeville, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Colonial Rehab & WellnessBardstown, KY 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Heritage Hall Rehab & WellLawrenceburg, KY 1 of 5Sunrise Manor Nursing HomeHodgenville, KY 2 of 5Fountain Circle Care & Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, KY 2 of 5Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCalvert City, KY 2 of 5Rockcastle Health & Rehabilitation CenterBrodhead, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClarksvilleClarksville, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Fentress CountyJamestown, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at North Hardin Rehab & WellnRadcliff, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at Summerfield Rehab & WellneLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of East LouisvilleLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of ElizabethtownElizabethtown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of GeorgetownGeorgetown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of McCreary County Rehab andPine Knot, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Roanoke RapidsRoanoke Rapids, NC 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Spencer CountyTaylorsville, KY 3 of 5Harrodsburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5Lee County Care & Rehabilitation CenterBeattyville, KY 3 of 5Morgantown Care & Rehabilitation CenterMorgantown, KY 3 of 5Pickett Care And Rehabilitation CenterByrdstown, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & WellnessMonteagle, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of NorfolkNorfolk, VA 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&wellness CtrRidgely, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & WeSouth Pittsburg, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at HillcrestOwensboro, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at Jackson Manor Rehab and WeAnnville, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of KinstonKinston, NC 3 of 5Spring City Care And Rehabilitation CenterSpring City, TN 3 of 5Westmoreland Care & Rehab CtrWestmoreland, TN 4 of 5Bluegrass Care & Rehabilitation CenterLexington, KY

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC — REIT · Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2013
JJLA LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2013
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/12/2015
BEVERS, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2020
GILLILAND, TERRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
HARPE, BRANDONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2020
KLEBER, COURTNEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2020
MARKEL, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2020
MCCORY, JACKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
REEDY, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
SMITH, RICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
DOYLE, MARIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
FISH, ERICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2020
HARRISON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
HOUCK, JAREDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2024
LEHNER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MANN, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/05/2026
MOORE, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2024
REVELETTE, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2022
ASBR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2018
LP TERRE HAUTE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
IOCOANGELI, ALICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
MACKE, CATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MARTIN, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/05/2023
STOREY, MARCIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHC IN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 9%Other / private 13%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$431per resident / day
operating cost
$13,111per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$400per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155426. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next