Signature Healthcare Of Muncie
4301 N Walnut St, Muncie, IN 47303 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (765) 282-0053 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.2% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.2% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.6% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.2% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.7% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.2% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.0% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.61 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.69 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 192 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.0%CMS range 46.9–60.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 25.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 88.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 4.0–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective monitoring and services were provided when Resident B requested to be transferred to the hospital after experiencing acute abdominal pain with nausea for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. This deficient practice resulted in the resident a delay in treatment that required emergent hospitalization for treatment of a perforated bowel with sepsis (severe infection throughout body), a hemicolectomy (a surgical intervention to permanently open the bowel), intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy via a PICC (a central intravenous line) line, and a permanent colostomy. Findings include: Resident B's closed clinical record was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 11:00 a.m. Diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, fracture of lower end of right femur, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right lower extremity, rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and constipation. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishware and utensils were washed in a method to ensure proper sanitization. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 111 of 111 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: During an observation of dishwasher testing, on 3/16/26 at 10:35 a.m., the Dietary Manager tested the dishwasher on three separate occasions. Each attempt registered no sanitizing solution in the final rinse water. The Dietary Manager obtained a second container of sanitation test strips and ran the dishwasher cycle again, which resulted in an indication of no sanitizing solution in the final rinse. The facility testing log, posted on the wall in the dish room, indicated the sanitizer that morning had indicated 100 parts per million (ppm). The signature of the person who completed the test was illegible. When interviewed, no employee present in the dietary department indicated they made the log entry. The two employees working in the dish room when the Dietary Manager completed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — patternProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from involuntary seclusion related to placement in a secured unit without meeting criteria when the facility failed to ensure a locked dementia unit was approved by the Indiana Department of Health prior to the unit being locked and failed to ensure residents who resided on the unit required a locked unit to treat a medical/behavioral condition for 5 of 5 residents reviewed of 18 who resided on the secured unit. (Residents 6, 87, 94, 12, and 3).Findings include:During the entrance conference, on 3/16/26 at 9:48 a.m., the Interim Administrator indicated the facility had a secure dementia unit.An Alzheimer's/Dementia Special Care Unit, State Form 48896, dated 3/17/26 and provided via email by the Corporate Nurse Consultant on 3/18/26 at 12:50 p.m., indicated the following:The facility did not have a mission or philosophy statement concerning the needs of residents with Alzheimer's disease, a related disorders or dementia.The criteria for admission, transfer, and discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment was completed prior to leaving medications unattended in a resident's room for 1 of 8 residents observed for medication administration (Resident 29). Finding includes: During a continuous medication administration observation, beginning on 3/18/26 at 9:12 a.m., RN 3 prepared the following medications for Resident 29: acetaminophen (Tylenol) 325 mg (2 tabs), acetazolamide 250 mg (for fluid retention), bumetanide (for swelling) 1 mg, carvedilol 12.5 mg (for hypertension), multivitamin, ferrous sulfate (iron) 325 mg, omeprazole 40 mg (for gastroesophageal reflux disease) delayed release, and spironolactone 25 mg (for fluid around the lungs). She took the medications into Resident 29's room. Resident 29 questioned why an additional pill was in the medication cup. RN 3 indicated the resident took acetazolamide on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for the resident's swelling. The resident indicated she did not want to take another water pill. She took enough of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and protect a resident's right to make choices concerning his personal attire when going outdoors to smoke for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 43) Findings include:During an interview on 3/18/26 at 10:48 a.m., Resident 43 indicated on the previous evening (3/17/26 at 4:30 p.m.), the Interim Administrator had informed him he had to wear a hood up to go out to smoke. The resident indicated he did not want to wear a hood, and it was his right to refuse to wear his hood up. He was wearing a hooded coat over a hooded sweatshirt and was dressed for cold weather. The Interim Administrator told him, I make the rules here. The resident indicated the Interim Administrator put hands on me! The Interim Administrator put his hands on the resident's shoulders and yanked the hood up on the resident's head. The resident then pushed the hood down. The Interim Administrator again yanked the hood back up on the resident's head. This action was followed by the resident pushing the hood back down. The Interim…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer/discharge and a bed hold policy were provided to the resident and/or resident representatives and information was communicated to the receiving facility to ensure continuity of care for 3 of 4 resident's reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident's 105, 113, and 30) Findings include: 1.Resident 105's record was reviewed on 3/17/2026 3:38 p.m Medical diagnoses included vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. A 1/15/26 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A 1/22/26, nurse's note indicated the resident was found pale, hypoxic (low oxygen saturation), and breathing strenuously. 911 was called for transfer to the emergency room (ER). The Physician, facility management, and resident's daughter were made aware of her transfer. A 1/22/26 Change of Condition event note indicated a notice of transfer/discharge was reviewed and given to the resident. The clinical record lacked notification of transfer to the receiving facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for 1 newly admitted resident of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 47)Finding includes: Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 3:18 p.m. Diagnoses included acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, gastrostomy status, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition.Current physician orders included enteral feeding tube site care- cleanse site with normal saline and cover with dry dressing once daily (3/13/26) and Jevity 1.5 (feeding tube nutrition) 52 ml per hour via feeding tube to run every shift when not eating during meal service (3/13/26).The clinical record lacked a baseline care plan.A 3/5/26, progress note indicated the resident admitted to the facility with a feeding tube in place.During an interview on 3/20/26 at 1:06 p.m., LPN 14 indicated she was uncertain who was responsible for completion of residents' baseline care plans for new admissions.On 3/20/26 at 1:10 p.m., RN 15 indicated the admitting nurse was required to follow the new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent complications related to clogging and skin impairment around the insertion site for a resident with a feeding tube for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 47)Finding includes: During an interview on 3/17/26 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 47 indicated she had a feeding tube and only received her tube feeding through the night. She took her medications by mouth and ate some food by mouth, but it was painful to eat. The facility staff managed her feeding tube. They performed feeding tube site care every other day. Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 3:18 p.m. Diagnoses included acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, gastrostomy status, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition.Current physician orders included enteral feeding tube site care- cleanse site with normal saline and cover with dry dressing once daily (3/13/26) and Jevity 1.5 (feeding tube nutrition) 52 ml per hour via feeding tube to run every shift when not eating during meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post current and accurate nursing staff information daily for residents and visitors. This deficiency had the potential to affect 114 of 114 residents in the facility.Findings include:During an observation on 3/16/26 at 9:23 a.m., the facility nurse staffing, dated 3/11/26, was posted on a clipboard at the front receptionist desk. The nursing staff posting, dated 3/11/26, included the following:Census: 116 Number of Registered Nurses (RN): Day shift hours: 15.50, Evening shift hours: 9.00, Night shift hours: 0.00, and Total hours: 24.50.Number of Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN): Day shift hours: 24.00, Evening shift hours: 29.50, Night shift hours: 30.00, and Total hours: 83.50. Number of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA): Day shift hours: 72.50, Evening shift hours: 47.00, Night shift hours: 43.50, and Total hours: 163.00.During an observation on 3/17/26 at 9:55 a.m., the facility nurse staffing, dated 3/17/26, was posted on a clipboard at the front receptionist desk. The nursing staff posting, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies.Findings include:Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for the facility's last annual recertification and licensure survey completed on January 23, 2025, indicated the facility had deficiencies related to failure to ensure the self-administration of medications assessment was completed prior to medications being left unattended in a resident's room.During an interview, on 3/20/26 at 2:03 p.m., the VP of Operations indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met quarterly to review current facility concerns. The QAA committee utilized an online program to assist with streamlining the process, assessing trends, and documentation of these meetings. The areas of concern cited previously in a survey would be followed per the plan of correction, which was usually for a period of six (6) months. If the audit tools indicated continued deficiency, then the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during feeding tube site care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 47)Finding includes: During an interview on 3/17/26 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 47 indicated staff managed her feeding tube. Staff did not wear a gown over their clothing when they manipulated her feeding tube.Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 3:18 p.m. Diagnoses included acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, gastrostomy status, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition.Current physician orders included enteral feeding tube site care- cleanse site with normal saline and cover with dry dressing once daily (3/13/26) and enhanced barrier precaution every shift (3/9/26).A 3/10/26, admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A current care plan, dated 3/16/26, indicated the resident required enhanced barrier precautions related to enteral feeding. Interventions included personal protective equipment as indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to distribute food with the correct temperatures for safety and palatability. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 114 of 114 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings include:During a test meal tray temperature check observation on 2/20/26 at 12:47 p.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following was observed: Milk temperature was 46 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and coleslaw was 64.2 degrees F. The Dietary Manager indicated the temperature was too high for the milk to be served.During an interview on 2/20/26 at 11:40 a.m., the Dietary Manger indicated food had temperature checks prior to plating and placed in the meal carts. The food was then delivered to the appropriate halls for food distribution.A current policy, dated 5/2014, titled Food: Quality and Palatability was provided by the Administrator on 2/24/26 at 3:46 p.m. The policy indicated the following: Policy StatementFood will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments as indicated by facility protocol following falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C)Finding includes:Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 11/17/25 at 2:42 p.m. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, essential primary hypertension, repeated falls, unspecified fracture of facial bones, unsteadiness on feet, and generalized muscle weakness. Current orders included tramadol (narcotic for pain) 25 mg three times daily as needed for pain, metoprolol succinate (blood pressure) 25 mg 0.5 tablet once daily, and aspirin (blood thinner for coronary artery disease) 81 mg once daily. A physician order for clopidogrel (blood thinner for coronary artery disease) 75 mg once daily was ordered on 7/15/25 and discontinued on 11/14/25. Review of the Medication Administration Records for August, September, October and November 2025 indicated the resident was taking both aspirin and clopidogrel during those months. Clopidogrel was discontinued by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) an unusual occurrence, related to potential neglect, when an unprescribed controlled medication was found in a dependent resident's system during a hospital stay for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident B)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 10/22/25 at 11:09 a.m. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, essential primary hypertension, unspecified asthma, unspecified convulsions, and heart failure. The medication allergy list included gabapentin. Physician's orders included levothyroxine (thyroid medication) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth once every morning and primidone (seizure medication) 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. An 8/20/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She required set-up assistance from staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and rolling left to right. The resident did not take opioids. A hospital progress note, dated 9/25/25 at 9:51 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an unusual occurrence related to potential neglect when an unprescribed substance was found in a resident during a hospital stay for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident B)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 10/22/25 at 11:09 a.m. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, essential primary hypertension, unspecified asthma, unspecified convulsions, and heart failure. The medication allergy list included gabapentin (seizure medication). Physician's orders included levothyroxine (thyroid medication) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth once every morning and primidone (seizure medication) 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. An 8/20/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She required set-up assistance from staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and rolling left to right. The resident did not take opioids. A care plan, revised 8/26/25, indicated the resident had an allergy to gabapentin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and intervene to promote the healing of pressure injuries for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for injuries (Resident C). Finding includes:Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 9/30/25 at 9:39 a.m. Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and dementia. Orders included wound nurse practitioner (NP) to provide wound management assessment and treatment by provider as needed (9/9/25), heel protectors while in bed, as tolerated (9/9/25), pressure relieving/redistribution mattress (9/8/25), pressure redistribution cushion to wheelchair (9/8/25), quetiapine (antipsychotic) 100 mg daily, trazodone (antidepressant) 100 mg daily, and sertraline (antidepressant) 25 mg daily. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/12/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She had an impairment to her functional range of motion to her lower extremity on one side. She required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative and/or family when an accident, resulting in injury, occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident M)Findings include:Resident M's closed clinical record was reviewed on 9/15/25 at 2:40 p.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and mild intellectual disabilities.Resident M's first emergency contact was a community social services employee and the second contact was a relative. Current physician's orders included buspirone 5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for depression, and diclofenac sodium gel 1% to be applied to right knee for pain four times a day.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/11/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, did not exhibit hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors, and had an intellectual disability. It was very important for Resident M's family and/or close friends to be involved in discussions about her care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from willful intimidation and verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident N) This deficient practice was corrected on 8/24/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:Resident N's clinical record was reviewed on 9/15/25 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting his right, dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unsteadiness on feet, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and congestive heart failure.Current physician's orders included hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 milligrams (mg) every six hours for pain, memantine 10 mg twice a day for dementia, sertraline 100 mg once a day for depression, alprazolam 0.25 mg twice a day for anxiety, and galantamine 8 mg twice a day for dementia.An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a suspected drug diversion to the appropriate regulatory agencies for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for narcotic medication administration. (Residents H, J, K, and M) Findings include: 1. Resident H's record was reviewed on 7/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included migraine, osteoarthritis (bone pain), fibromyalgia (nerve pain) , and chronic pain syndrome. Physician orders included oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 7.5-325 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours only while awake. Resident H's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated she received a dose of oxycodone on 6/2/25 scheduled at 6:00 p.m. but was charted at 8:22 p.m. with the comment per lpn by LPN 15. A dose of oxycodone scheduled for 6/2/25 at 10:00 p.m. was charted on 6/3/25 at 9:39 a.m. as not given due to condition, signed by QMA 20. A dose scheduled for 6/3/25 at 2:00 a.m. was charted as refused on 6/3/25 at 4:10 a.m. by QMA 2 due to the resident sleeping. Resident H's narcotic sign out sheet, provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a through investigation of an suspected drug diversion for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for medication admnistration. (Residents H, K, L,and M) Findings include: 1. Resident H's record was reviewed on 7/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included migraine, osteoarthritis (bone pain), fibromyalgia (nerve pain) , and chronic pain syndrome. Physician orders included oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 7.5-325 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours only while awake. Resident H's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated she received a dose of oxycodone on 6/2/25 scheduled at 6:00 p.m. but was charted at 8:22 p.m. with the comment per lpn by LPN 15. A dose of oxycodone scheduled for 6/2/25 at 10:00 p.m. was charted on 6/3/25 at 9:39 a.m. as not given due to condition, signed by QMA 20. A dose scheduled for 6/3/25 at 2:00 a.m. was charted as refused on 6/3/25 at 4:10 a.m. by QMA 2 due to the resident sleeping. Resident H's narcotic sign out sheet, provided by the Corporate Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medication administration was accurately documented and medication amounts reconciled according to facility policy for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Residents H, K, L, and M) Findings included: 1. Resident H's record was reviewed on 7/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included migraine, osteoarthritis (bone pain), fibromyalgia (nerve pain) , and chronic pain syndrome. Physician orders included oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 7.5-325 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours only while awake. Resident H's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated she received a dose of oxycodone on 6/2/25 scheduled at 6:00 p.m. but was charted at 8:22 p.m. with the comment per lpn by LPN 15. A dose of oxycodone scheduled for 6/2/25 at 10:00 p.m. was charted on 6/3/25 at 9:39 a.m. as not given due to condition, signed by QMA 20. A dose scheduled for 6/3/25 at 2:00 a.m. was charted as refused on 6/3/25 at 4:10 a.m. by QMA 2 due to the resident sleeping. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility following a hospital outpatient observation and failed to indicate supporting rationale or documentation for the discharge . (Resident C) Findings include: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 6/2/25 at 11:01 a.m Diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pressure ulcer of sacral region, chronic osteomyelitis, polyneuropathy, muscle spasm, chronic stage 3 kidney disease, opioid use, chronic pain syndrome, and depressive disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A 3/28/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident C was cognitively intact and had moderate depression. Review of Resident C's care plans indicated the resident displayed verbal aggression. The clinical record lacked a care plan for physical aggression. Review of a progress note, dated 5/1/25 at 1:35 p.m., indicated Unit Manager 1 heard Resident C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate dietary staff to ensure room tray meals were delivered in a timely manner for 3 of 9 Units. (100 Unit, 300 Unit, and 400 Unit) Findings include: Review of a Meal/Cart Delivery Time schedule, provided by the facility on 1/15/25, indicated the dinner service meal carts were scheduled to arrive at the following times on the specified units: 100 Unit - 5:35 p.m. 300 Unit - 5:55 p.m. 400 Unit - 6:05 p.m. During observations of dinner service meal tray delivery, on 1/21/25, the meal trays were observed delivered at the following times on the specified units: 100 Unit - 6:19 p.m.: This was a 44 minute delay. The last tray was delivered at 6:25 p.m. 300 Unit - 6:52 p.m.: This was a 57 minute delay. The last tray was delivered at 6:59 p.m. 400 Unit - 7:02 p.m.: This was a 57 minute delay. The last tray was delivered at 7:12 p.m. During an observation on 1/21/25 at 7:03 p.m., Resident 76 was seated in her wheelchair in the doorway of her room with the door open and gazed down the unit. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who entered into a binding arbitration agreement were granted the right to verbally rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing it and were granted the right to rescind the original agreement for a subsequent stay if discharged and re-admitted to the facility or admitted to another facility owned by the same corporation in the future. This deficiency has the potential to affect 57 of the 127 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: During an interview, during the entrance conference, on 1/15/25 at 10:10 a.m., the Administrator indicated the facility utilized arbitration agreements. The facility's arbitration agreement provided by the administrator with entrance conference paperwork on 1/15/25, was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 9:15 a.m. The arbitration agreement was included in the residents' admission paperwork and indicated the following: .Unless rescinded within thirty (30) days under Paragraph 10 below, this agreement will also remain valid and of full force and effect even if the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment was completed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 17) Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/15/25 at 11:11 a.m., Resident 17 was in bed with a plastic container on her bedside table. The plastic container held five bottles of eye drops. During an interview, on 1/16/25 at 10:41 a.m., Resident 17 was seated in her wheelchair at the side of her bed. There was a plastic container and a rectangular white box on her bedside table. The plastic container held five bottles of eye drops. The white box contained one bottle of eye drops. Resident 17 indicated she used her eye drops twice a day, was allowed to keep them in her room, and the staff were aware. The plastic container had the following eye drop bottles: 1. Rocklatan (netarsudil and latanoprost) 0.02% drops (a prescription eye drop to reduce eye pressure) without a label or resident identifiers. 2. Systane (an over the counter eye lubricant) night gel 10 grams (g). 1 to 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident funds for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal property. (Resident B) Finding includes: A 12/24/24, facility reported incident indicated Resident B reported that he discovered his debit card, grocery card from insurance company and drivers license missing from wallet upon returning from dialysis on 12/24/24. Reported that CNA 31 had assisted him with an online order that night before. The immediate actions taken included reported to the Administrator, local police were called and CNA 31 was suspended pending outcome. The investigation was underway. Preventative measures taken included the suspension of CNA 31 and the police were called. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 1:31 p.m. Diagnoses included dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and need for assistance with personal care. A 11/25/24, Admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated Resident B was cognitively intact and had reasonably consistent decision making. Resident B required partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide increased monitoring and assessment and interventions for a resident experiencing a worsening change in condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a urinary tract infection. (Resident 76) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/15/25 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 76 indicated, in November 2024, she had a really bad urinary tract infection (UTI). She had vomiting and diarrhea, and two nurses would not send her out to the hospital for further evaluation. She begged them to send her out. When she finally was sent out, the hospital gave her a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line and admitted her. She was concerned because the facility was so slow to give antibiotics. The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 10:10 a.m. Diagnoses included sepsis, unspecified organism, overactive bladder, dysuria, and post COVID-19. A current physician order, dated 12/14/24, included Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) capsule by mouth once daily given for UTI prevention. A physician order,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident smoking materials were securely stored for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 86) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/16/25 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 86 was in her room. She indicated she was a smoker and signed herself out to go smoke. She received her cigarettes and lighter from the facility when she signed out on leave of absence early in the day. Then, she kept her smoking paraphernalia for the day, in her purse in bed on her side. She returned the smoking paraphernalia to the facility at the end of the day. Resident 86's clinical record was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 10:26 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and current tobacco use. A current physician order, dated 8/10/24, indicated the resident used oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. She used tobacco. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/16/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications, treatments, and biological products were properly labeled and stored for 2 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (Medication Room East for 100/200/300/400 halls, Medication Room [NAME] for the 500/600/700 halls, Medication Cart for the 200 hall, and Treatment Cart for the 500/800 halls) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 1/21/25 at 10:11 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the refrigerator in the Medication Room East contained an open vial of influenza vaccine and an open vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD). The vial and box containing the influenza vaccine vial lacked an open date. The vial and plastic package containing the PPD lacked an open date. The temperature log indicated the temperature was taken daily. The DON indicated, at the time of the observation, that the temperature was taken daily on the medication refrigerators and the vials should have open dates. 2. During an observation, on 1/21/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies. Finding includes: Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for the facility's last annual recertification and licensure survey completed on 2/9/24, indicated the facility had deficiencies related to failure to follow infection control guidelines related to isolation procedures and failure to ensure medications were labeled with resident identifiers and directions. During an interview, on 1/23/25 at 4:19 p.m., the Administration indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met quarterly to review current facility concerns. The QAA committee utilized an online program to assist with streamlining the process, assessing trends, and documentation of these meetings. The current nursing topics were wounds and falls. During a follow-up interview, on 1/23/25 at 4:43 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have any current QAPI or Performance Improvement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an infection control program which provided Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and/or isolation services in order to eliminate or reduce the risk of spread of contagions for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for infection prevention. (Residents 66 and 86) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 11:39 a.m., Resident 66's door had two signs posted. The first sign was a red stop sign posted on pink paper. The second sign was instructions regarding how to correctly apply PPE (personal protective equipment). The door signs did not contain direction regarding what type of isolation the resident was under, what was required to enter the room, when a staff or visitor needed to wear P.P.E. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 11:42 a.m., QMA 19 indicated Resident 66 was on some type of precautions, however she was unsure of the type and it might be droplet isolation. She left and quickly returned stating the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) or contact isolation due to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the automated external defibrillator (AED) was maintained in safe operating condition. (Resident F) Finding includes: Resident F's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:23 p.m. A progress note, dated [DATE] at 11:13 a.m., indicated the resident was observed unresponsive without a pulse. Facility staff had called a code (a medical term for cardiac arrest) and begun cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Emergency services (EMS) were contacted. A progress note, dated [DATE] at 12:11 p.m., indicated the facility staff had transferred CPR and rescue breathing to the EMS, who continued without success. CPR was ceased at 11:28 a.m. During an interview, on [DATE] at 11:51 a.m., RN 29 indicated when a code blue (a medical term for cardiac arrest) was called the staff would get the crash cart from the end of the 700 hall and the AED off the wall, at the junction of the 800 hallway. He indicated the AED was in working order as it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse from a staff member and failed to implement the facility abuse policy to protect the resident from the possibility of further abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident F) Findings include: An 11/5/24, facility self-reported incident indicated the following: Brief Description of Incident: A resident reported that a staff member was impatient, making comments regarding her incontinence and pushed her back towards the bathroom when the resident attempted to leave bathroom. The immediate actions taken were the completion of a skin assessment with no signs of injury and the suspension of the staff member pending an investigation. The Director of Nursing, Administrator, and Physician were notified. Preventative measures taken included the social services department was to do a psychosocial follow-up and the staff member was to remain suspended pending investigation. Resident F's clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24 at 3:11 p.m. Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, adult failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately and consistently assess a new pressure injury and failed to promptly initiate wound treatment to promote healing of pressure injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident B). Findings include: Resident B's closed clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24 at 11:07 a.m. Diagnoses included ventricular tachycardia, subsequent encounter for closed fracture of the neck of the left femur, muscle weakness, and unspecified dementia. A 9/3/24, admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated Resident B was cognitively intact, had no wounds or pressure ulcers, and required partial assistance from staff for bed mobility and transferring. A skin integrity care plan, initiated 9/3/24, indicated the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers related to decreased mobility. Approaches included to report changes in skin status and to complete treatments per physician order. A Skin Integrity Event, dated 9/9/24, indicated a skin tear to the sacrum, measuring 2.5 centimeters (cm) length x 2.0 cm width x…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered careplan and interventions to address a resident's use of alcohol and physical aggressive behaviors. (Resident K) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 8/29/24 at 9:34 a.m. Diagnoses included history of pulmonary embolism, history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, fracture of neck of right femur, pressure ulcer of sacral region, osteomyelitis, acute kidney failure, polyneuropathy, chronic stage 3 kidney disease, opioid use, chronic congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, hyperkalemia, and vitamin D deficiency. The most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/30/24 indicated Resident K was cognitively intact. Review of the clinical record indicated a lack of a care plan and interventions to address Resident K's alcohol consumption and physical aggression. A progress note, dated 08/19/24 at 3:59 p.m., indicated Resident K had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse from a staff member for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident F) Findings include: During an interview with Resident L, on 7/3/24 at 11:03 a.m., she indicated she witnessed CNA 6 tell Resident F that the resident needed to get out of the facility. She didn't need to live there, and needed to move in with her ex-husband and mooch off him. The CNA also told Resident F that her grandkids didn't love her. During an interview with Resident K, on 7/3/24 at 11:58 a.m., she indicated she had witnessed CNA 6 arguing with Resident F because she intentionally did not pass ice to Resident F. Resident F reported it, and CNA 6 told Resident F that she was a bully and she needed to move back in with her husband and that her children only wanted her for her money. During an interview with Resident F, on 7/3/24 at 12:29 p.m., she indicated CNA 6 would not give her ice water and told her that she had to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner for 1 of 3 reportable abuse allegations reviewed. Findings include: A facility reported incident indicated an allegation of verbal abuse occurred on 6/27/24 at 4:45 p.m. when Resident F alleged CNA 6 intentionally skipped providing ice water to her because CNA 6 felt Resident F could get it herself. This led to a loud verbal exchange during which angry language was used by each party. The confirmation email for the incident indicated it was submitted to the Indiana State Department of Health on 6/30/24 at 8:27 a.m. During an interview with the Administrator, on 7/3/24 at 4:18 p.m., he indicated abuse was to be reported within 24 hours unless it involved physical abuse, then it was to be reported within two hours. A current facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, provided by the Nurse Consultant on 7/3/24 at 4:51 p.m., indicated the following: .Reporting Guidelines: Any abuse allegations must be reported to State within 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers/bed baths per the resident care plan and resident preference for 2 of 4 residents reviewed of activities of daily living. (Residents E and M) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/5/2024 at 11:21 a.m. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hydronephrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, hearing loss, and chronic pain syndrome. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident E was cognitively intact and required supervision and touch assistance for showers and shower transfers. Review of the facility shower schedule indicated Resident E was scheduled for showers on Mondays, Thursdays and Saturday evenings. Review of Resident E's care plans indicated bathing preferences had not been assessed and recorded. Review of Resident E's care plans indicated a history of refusal for treatment/care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medication was obtained to continue treatment for a resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident B) Findings include: The closed clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/2/24 at 6:45 p.m. Diagnoses included anemia, nausea with vomiting, history of stroke with right side hemiplegia, and copper deficiency. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 7:00 p.m., from an acute care hospital stay. The hospital discharge orders included copper sulfate (supplement) 2 mg (milligram) daily for the duration of 30 days for anemia due to gastrointestinal blood loss. A physician hematology consultation report, dated 6/3/24, completed during the resident's acute hospital stay included the following: Copper deficiency. Start copper sulfate 2 mg orally daily, to continue even on discharge, for 1 month. The resident's physician admission orders, dated 6/7/24, included Copper Sulfate (cupric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, served, and distributed in a manner to prevent possible cross contamination for 1 of 1 food service line observations on 2/7/24 lunch meal service. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 116 of 116 resident who consumed meals prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an observation of the lunch meal service line on 2/7/24 from 11:30 a.m. to 11:48 a.m., the following concerns regarding possible cross contamination of foods were observed: At 11:40 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM), using gloved hands, touched a bun, left the meal service area wearing the same gloves, opened drawers and retrieved utensils with the same gloves, and returned to the food service area wearing the same contaminated gloves. Using the same contaminated gloves, she touched lettuce, cheese, pickles, and tomatoes. She left the food service area again and returned to the area with the same gloves and continued meal service. At 11:41 a.m., [NAME] 2 touched a bread slice with her gloved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the grievance process to promptly resolve resident grievances/concerns/complaints and follow up with a corrective action for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident F and G) and 6 of 6 residents interviewed in a group setting. Findings include: Confidential interviews were completed during the survey. During a confidential interview, it was indicated there was nothing to look forward to when it came to meals. The portion sizes were much like toddler portions and they would still be hungry if family didn't keep their room stocked with groceries. The pizza tasted like a biscuit with ketchup on it and a small amount of cheese. Yesterday, the sweet potatoes were water-logged, lacked flavor due to being over cooked, and mushy. Many of the different meats were gray on the inside and tough, and were difficult to chew. The bread was served soggy on the plate along with undrained vegetables. Nearly every meal, the food needed to be reheated which made the tough meat worse. As recent as last night, grilled cheese…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was attractive, palatable, and contained satisfying portions for 12 of 12 residents reviewed for food satisfaction and palatability, and 6 of 6 residents interviewed in a group setting. Findings include: Confidential interviews were completed during the survey. During confidential resident interviews, the following concerns were expressed regarding food attractiveness, portion size, and palatability: a. The portions are not large enough. I am usually hungry after I finish eating. The food is often unappetizing. Regarding a recent breakfast, all I got was a biscuit, nothing else. I did not have funds to purchase a snack. b. They are frequently not careful when they place the food on the plate. They got a lot of veggie juice on the plate and the roll would be all wet and soggy, so I didn't eat it. It was not attractive or palatable. c. Many times, the menu does not reflect what was served. Last night, the tray card that lists menu items to be served, listed tomato soup and grilled cheese. The tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete thorough investigations of alleged abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents E and L) Findings include: 1. Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 2/6/24 at 4:33 p.m. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, need for assistance with personal care, and other reduced mobility. A Nurse's Note, dated 12/13/23 at 4:19 p.m., indicated the resident verbalized a CNA was mean to her. The resident was more tearful and had increased confusion. The family, provider, and DON were aware. A review of the facility's investigation of the abuse allegation was completed on 2/7/24 at 4:04 p.m. The investigation documentation, dated 12/13/23, lacked interviews/statements from the following individuals: the alleged perpetrator, the nurse on duty during the alleged event, and other staff members who worked with the alleged perpetrator. The file included an undated skin assessment. The alleged perpetrator continued to work with residents during the investigation. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of resident discharge for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Ombudsman notification. (Residents 112 & G) Findings include: 1. Resident 112's closed clinical record was reviewed on 2/8/24 at 11:21 a.m. The resident's discharge diagnoses included acute duodenal ulcer with perforation, peptic ulcer, and anemia. The resident was discharged to the hospital via ambulance on 12/12/23 and was admitted . The resident chose not to return to the facility following his hospitalization. Review of a facility email indicated the Ombudsman notification of residents who were discharge in December 2023 was sent to the Ombudsman 2/9/24. The December 2023 Discharge and Transfer Form Ombudsman Fax Log, listed Resident 112's name and date of discharge. During an interview, on 2/9/24 at 12:18 p.m., the Social Services Director indicated the December 2023 discharge form had not been sent in January as required. The lack of timely notification was caused by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge care plan and assist a resident to obtain his discharge goals for 1 of 1 residents who desired to discharge home following therapy. (Resident 12) Findings include: During an interview on 2/6/24 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 12 indicated he had come to the facility for therapy and desired to return to a home living environment now that his therapy was completed. He didn't really know what the plan was. He believed he needed to get on a list for income based housing. He needed some help with the process and hoped the facility would help him. At this point, he was unsure of what was happening. During an observation at this time, the resident was neat and clean. He was dressed appropriately for the weather. He was wearing rubber soled shoes and walking independently with a cane. Resident 12's clinical records was reviewed 2/8/24 at 10:33 a.m. Current diagnoses include, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, and atrial fibrillation. A 11/13/23 at 4:52 p.m., admission progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of weights outside the ordered parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for edema. (Resident 265) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 265 was reviewed on 2/6/24 at 3:27 p.m. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, diastolic congestive heart failure, acute osteomyelitis right foot/ankle, and peripheral vascular disease. A current physician's order, dated 1/18/24, indicated to obtain daily weights and to notify the physician or nurse practitioner for a greater than two pound weight gain in one day or greater than five pound weight gain in a week. A care plan, dated 1/29/24, indicated the resident was at risk for actual fluid imbalance related to diuretic therapy. The goal included the resident would be free of complications from fluid overload. An approach for the care plan included to obtain weights as indicated and to report significant changes to the physician or nurse practitioner. The resident had weights documented as follows: On 1/18/24, the resident's weight was documented as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were reconciled per facility policy for 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (800 hall cart) Findings include: During a medication storage observation of the 800 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 11 on 2/9/24 at 11:02 a.m., the Narcotics Sheet Count was reviewed, and the following dates lacked shift to shift reconciliation of controlled medications: In December 2023- 12/6: 7:00 a.m.- 7:00 p.m. shift and 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/7: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/8: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/9: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/10: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/11: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/16: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/21: 7:00 a.m.- 7:00 p.m. shift 12/26: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 12/27: 7:00 a.m.- 7:00 p.m. shift 12/28: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift In January 2024- 1/1: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 1/2: 7:00 a.m.- 7:00 p.m. shift and 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 1/3: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 1/8: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 1/9: 7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. shift 1/10: 7:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications stored in the medication refrigerator in the hall medication storage room were labeled with resident identifiers and directions for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed (100 hall) and for 13 of 13 residents' treatments stored in the treatment carts. (800 and 500 halls) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the 100 unit medication room, accompanied by LPN 8 on 2/8/24 at 9:47 a.m., sixteen unlabeled 650 mg (milligrams) acetaminophen (to treat fevers or mild pain) suppositories were in the refrigerator. During an interview, at the time of the observation, LPN 8 indicated there were no labels present on the medication and she did not know why the suppositories were stored in the medication room. 2. During a medication storage observation of the treatment cart for the 800 and 500 halls, accompanied by LPN 11 on 2/9/24 at 11:30 a.m., the following medications were observed without resident identifiers and directions: Two tubes of Woun'Dres collagen hydrogel (to promote wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to isolation procedures for 1 of 1 residents on isolation precautions. (Resident 267) Finding include: During an observation on 2/5/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 267's room door had signage indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions and had a personal protective equipment (PPE) cart outside her door. RN 15 and an unidentified CNA were observed entering the resident's room to pull her up in the bed. The staff had not donned PPE. During an interview at the time of the observation, RN 15 indicated she was unsure if the resident was actually on transmission based precautions and thought the PPE was not longer necessary. She had not had a chance to check. During an observation on 2/7/24 at 12:33 p.m., the resident's door continued to have signage indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions and a PPE supply cart outside her door. Resident 267's clinical record was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 12:40 p.m. Diagnoses included vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (resistant bacterial infection) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nursing services. (Resident G) Findings include: Resident G's clinical record was reviewed on 11/29/23 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses include muscle weakness (generalized) other reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/22/23, indicated she was cognitively intact. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/20/23, indicated her cognitive status was not assessed. She required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. She was dependent on staff to roll left and right. She was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. A facility investigation for Resident G, reviewed on 11/29/23 at 12:20 p.m., indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident' representative regarding an allegation of neglect in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for notifications. (Resident G) Findings include: Resident G's clinical record was reviewed on 11/29/23 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses include muscle weakness (generalized) other reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact. A facility investigation for Resident G, reviewed on 11/29/23 at 12:20 p.m., indicated the following: A typed interview statement for Resident G, completed by the interim DON and dated 11/28/23, indicated Resident G stated CNA 6 came into her room assisted her into bed. Once she was in bed, CNA 6 left and she never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was immediately reported to the Administrator for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident G) Findings include: Resident G's clinical record was reviewed on 11/29/23 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses include muscle weakness (generalized) other reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated her cognitive status was not assessed. She required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. She was dependent on staff to roll left and right. She was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate infection control practices while providing care for a resident in transmission-based precautions during a random observation. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 11/30/23 at 10:04 a.m. Diagnoses include dementia, hypertension, and COVID-19. During an observation on 11/29/23 at 11:37 a.m., CNA 1 was delivering lunch room trays. The CNA entered an isolation room (Resident J's room) without donning additional PPE. The door to the resident's room displayed signage for appropriate PPE use. An isolation cart was located outside the door. CNA 1 exited the room carrying an empty tray (from breakfast). During an interview, at the time of the observation, CNA 1 indicated they did not don the appropriate PPE, but should have. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 11:42 a.m., The Rehab Unit Manager indicated CNA 1 should have donned the appropriate PPE before entering an isolation room. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 3:34 p.m., LPN 3 indicated all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician when blood sugars were outside of parameters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for blood sugars (Resident C and Resident M). Findings include: 1. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 10:00 a.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, dietary counseling and surveillance, type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. His medications included take blood sugar at 6:00 a.m. daily, insulin glargine (treat high blood sugar) 22 units daily (7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.), insulin lispro (treat high blood sugar) 5 units before meals (7:00 a.m., 11:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.), insulin lispro per sliding scale three time daily (8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.) , if his blood sugar was less than 60, call the physician .if his blood sugar was greater than 500, call the physician, Glucagon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by CNA 4 for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B and CNA 4). Findings include: On 9/26/23 at 3:09 p.m., Resident B was observed ambulating with her walker in the hallway. She indicated staff was nice to her and they better be. No one had ever been mean to her and she wouldn't put up with it, she paid the bill at the facility. On 9/28/23 at 4:02 p.m., Resident B was observed ambulating with her walker in the hallway. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 11:45 a.m. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, recurrent, Alzheimer's disease. unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/5/23, indicated she was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). She had a current care plan for being at risk for change in mood state, she report a stakeholder hit and grabbed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency timely for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse allegations (Resident L and CNA 6, Resident K and CNA 6 and Resident F and CNA 13.) Findings include: Confidential interviews were conducted during the course of the survey. During a confidential interview, it was indicated Resident L yelled at CNA 6 to get out of her face because she didn't want her hair brushed. CNA 6 told Resident L when someone told her to get out of her face, she won't, because no one would talk to her like that. That same day, Resident K said something about CNA 6's mom. CNA 6 told Resident K that no one talked about her mom and if she did she was going to go to jail. Resident K had anxiety and with CNA 6 telling her she was going to go to jail caused her more anxiety and she began to cry and got worked up. They were taught about the signs of abuse through education and to report. The incidents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse allegations (Resident L and CNA 6, Resident K and CNA 6 and Resident F and CNA 13). Findings include: Confidential interviews were conducted during the course of the survey. During a confidential interview, it was indicated Resident L yelled at CNA 6 to get out of her face because she didn't want her hair brushed. CNA 6 told Resident L when someone told her to get out of her face, she won't, because no one would talk to her like that. That same day, Resident K said something about CNA 6's mom. CNA 6 told Resident K that no one talked about her mom and if she did she was going to go to jail. Resident K had anxiety and with CNA 6 telling her she was going to go to jail caused her more anxiety and she began to cry and got worked up. They were taught about the signs of abuse through education and to report. The incidents were immediately reported to the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents B, Resident D, CNA 13 and CNA 14 ) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/11/2023 at 10:44 a.m. Diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, hypertension, depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the most current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/2/2023, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a facility reportable, dated 8/25/2023, indicated on 8/25/2023 CNA 13 used inappropriate language with Resident B when he requested assistance. During an interview, on 9/11/2023 at 11:58 a.m., Resident B indicated CNA 13 cussed him out when he requested assistance getting off the bedpan and told him he needed to get his a _ _ up and go to the bathroom. She would not let it go. She kept yelling and cussing. Finally, I lost it and started yelling back. 2. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of staff to resident abuse for 1 of 3 allegations of abuse reviewed (CNA 14 and Resident D). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 9/11/2023 at 3:25 p.m. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the most current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/2/2023, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. During an interview Employee 7 indicated they witnessed CNA 14 using an excessively loud voice and inappropriate language with Resident D. The Employee indicated they felt CNA 14 was being intimidating towards Resident D. Employee 7 did not report the incident. They indicated they should have reported the incident to the Administrator. During an interview on 9/11/2023 at 1:45 p.m., RN 11 indicated on 9/10/2023 they witnessed Resident D taking ice from the ice chest in the clean utility. CNA 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/01/2013 |
| MIDCAP FINCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/23/2023 |
| BEVERS, SUSAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| FISH, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| GILLILAND, TERRENCE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| HARPE, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| KLEBER, COURTNEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MANN, DEBORAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/10/2014 |
| MARKEL, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MCCORY, JACK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| REEDY, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| SMITH, RICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| STOREY, MARC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ASBR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2018 |
| HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| LP MUNCIE MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| SIGNATURE REHAB CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| BERRYMAN, CHRISTY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/02/2025 |
| HARRISON, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| HILTZ, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| HOUCK, JARED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2024 |
| LEHNER, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOORE, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/12/2024 |
| RAPP, ROLAND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| REVELETTE, BARBARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/17/2022 |
| SMEDRA, IRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| STEIER III, ELMER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| STIGLER, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| THOMAS, EILEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/16/2025 |
| WINTNER, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| CAPITAL ONE NA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/07/2018 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/18/2024 |
| JJLA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| LP MUNCIE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/03/2025 |
| LPSNF LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| PHARMACY CORPORATION OF AMERICA-MA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2018 |
| PHARMERICA HOLDINGS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2018 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/12/2015 |
| SHC IN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/03/2025 |
| SHC MEDICAL PARTNERS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| SHC MEDICAL PARTNERS OF INDIANA, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2020 |
| SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| STAKEHOLDER PAYROLL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| WHEATEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| DOYLE, MARIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 82 rows in the source record cover these 46 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
21 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155242. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.