Signature Healthcare of Kinston

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide 1 of 3 meals observed at the regular scheduled times (lunch 12/01/25). The lunch meal was served 2 hours after the posted mealtimes to the dining room and all 5 halls. The findings included: The posted mealtimes documented lunch service in the dining room was to begin at 12:00 PM, the 500 hall at 12:15 PM, the 400 Hall at 12:30 PM, the 300 Hall at 12:45 PM, the 200 Hall at 1:00 PM, and the 100 Hall at 1:15 PM. Observation of the lunch meal service on 12/01/25 revealed the lunch meal trays arrived at 2:15 PM in the dining room, at 2:20 on the 500 Hall, at 2:23 PM on the 400 Hall, at 2:25 PM on the 300 Hall, at 2:32 PM on the 200 Hall, and at 2:40 PM on the 100 Hall. In an interview on 12/01/25 at 2:21 PM, the Regional Dietary Manager (acting as the interim dietary manager) confirmed the lunch trays were still being plated in the kitchen and had not been served to the 300, 200, and 100 Halls. She stated the lunch meal was being served late due to staffing issues in the kitchen. The dishes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #101). The findings included: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (stroke). He was discharged from the facility to the community on 9/19/25. Resident #101's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he was cognitively intact, had no behaviors or signs of depression, and propelled himself in his wheelchair independently. A facility Investigation Report dated 4/08/25 documented that on 4/05/25 at 1:40 PM, Housekeeper #1 started cursing at him because he wasn't moving his wheelchair down the hallway and had blocked her cart. Housekeeper #1 was witnessed cursing at the resident and was escorted out of the building during the investigation. The facility investigation found two other employees heard the interaction and confirmed Housekeeper #1 did curse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation property and exploitation for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #103 and Resident #4) reviewed for abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of property/exploitation. (1) In November 2024, Resident #103 reported her debit card account had been depleted to $9.34 after giving Nurse Aide (NA) #3 her debit card to pay her (NA #3's) light bill. The unauthorized spending to Resident #103's debit card totaled $2265.15. (2) In July 2025, NA #2 told Resident #4 she needed money to feed her children and Resident #4 gave NA #2 $65 dollars and was not reimbursed by the facility. Findings included: 1. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #103 was moderately cognitively impaired. An initial report dated 11/24/2024 alleging…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of property/exploitation to Adult Protective Services (APS) for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and/or exploitation (Resident #103, Resident #101 and Resident #74). Findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property policy statement last reviewed 1/31/2025 indicated the facility Administrator was responsible for reporting all investigation results of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property to applicable State agencies as required by Federal and State law. 1. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An initial report dated 11/24/2024 for misappropriation of property was completed by the former Director of Nursing #1 and faxed to the State Agency. The initial report recorded the facility became aware on 11/24/2024 at 5:00 pm that Resident #108 alleged an employee, Nurse Aide (NA) #3 had borrowed money from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident who was admitted to the facility with serious mental health diagnoses for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #18).Findings included:A PASRR Level 1 Determination Notification Letter dated 8/11/25 indicated Resident #18 had a Level I PASRR with no expiration date and no mental or behavioral health restrictions. The hospital's Discharge summary dated [DATE] included bipolar disorder as a secondary diagnosis for Resident #18 and recorded Resident #18's psychiatric history consisted of bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression that included significant anxiety and trauma history.Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a bipolar disorder, an anxiety disorder, depression, PTSD and tremors.Physician progress notes dated 8/27/25 recorded Resident #18 had an history…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and Medical Director interview, the (a) facility failed to ensure that required emergency tracheostomy (trach) equipment, including an Ambu bag (self-inflating bag that pushes air into lungs), was kept at the bedside as ordered and as required by facility policy and (b) failed to ensure infection-control practices were followed during tracheostomy care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident #8).Findings included:(a) A review of the facility's Tracheostomy Policy revealed that, for emergency management, an emergency tracheostomy tube and an Ambu bag were required to be kept at the resident's bedside.A review of standing admission orders included maintain trach equipment at the bedside at all times, including the obturator (An obturator is a curved rod that fits inside the tracheal cannula, which is a tube inserted into the trachea during tracheostomy), a spare trach tube, and an Ambu bag.On 10/13/2025 Resident #8 was admitted with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to follow the approved menu for 1 of 7 residents on a pureed diet (Residents #80). The findings included: The Week 2 dietitian approved menu indicated residents on a pureed diet were to receive pureed cornbread. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident #80's physician orders dated [DATE] documented he was to receive a pureed diet. During an observation of tray line on [DATE] at 12:07 PM, [NAME] #1 plated Resident #80's meal which included pureed chicken, pureed broccoli, and pureed candied yams. There was no pureed cornbread or pureed bread product available to serve and none was observed on his tray. Resident #80's tray was then covered and put into the dining room cart for service. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:08 PM, [NAME] #1 stated she forgot to make a pureed bread item to serve. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:09 PM, the Corporate Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident Interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of medications, smoking, elimination and behaviors for 4 of 28 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed (Resident #14, #17, #13, and #33). Findings included: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus. There was a physician order for the following hypoglycemic medications on Resident #14's electronic medical record (EMR): * On 11/23/2023, Novolin Regular flex pen insulin 100 units per milliliter, give 11 units subcutaneous three times a day * On 11/23/2023, Novolin Regular flex pen insulin 100 units per milliliter per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. * For blood glucose reading 200-250, give 3 units subcutaneous. * For blood glucose reading 251 -300, give 5 units subcutaneous. * For blood glucose reading 301-350, give 7 units subcutaneous. * For blood glucose reading 351-400,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess the ability of a resident to self-administer medications prior to leaving the resident's medications on the overbed table in the resident's room for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #18). Resident #18 indicated she could not take a lot of medications together at one time and the medications were left on her overbed table to take when she wanted to. Findings included: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #18 was cognitively intact. Physician orders included the following medication orders for Resident #18 that were active on 10/14/24: - Acetaminophen 325 milligram (mg) tablets give two tablets for pain or fever every six hours as needed. - Augmentin 875-125 mg tablet give twice a day ending 10/15/2024. - Ciprofloxacin HCL 500 mg tablet give one tablet twice daily for seven days. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the required Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (form 10123) and the and failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review (Resident #75). The findings included: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare Part A skilled services. Resident #75's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #75's Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 4/12/24 and her Medicare Part A Skilled Nursing Facility benefit was not exhausted. She remained in the facility. Record review revealed no evidence that Resident #75 or the resident's responsible party were provided the NOMNC notice or the ABN. During an interview with the Business Office Manager on 10/16/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC