Signature Healthcare of East Louisville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to develop and implement the care plan for one of three sampled residents, Residient (R) 1. On 01/22/2024, R1 became a ward of the state and was deemed as wholly disabled. She required assistance with managing both her personal and financial affairs. The facility, however, failed to develop the resident's care plan to include her becoming a ward of the state. On 09/17/2024, the resident exhibited exit-seeking behaviors and was placed on 15 minute checks, however, the facility failed to develop the resident's care plan to include the exit-seeking behaviors. Further, interview with facility staff revealed the resident roamed throughout the facility with personal items in her wheelchair or on her walker and verbalized delusions of going home. The facility, however, failed to develop the resident's care plan to include her behaviors of roaming and expressions of wanting to leave the facility. On 11/27/2024, exact time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, facility policy review and Google Maps review, the facility failed to provide residents with adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of three sampled residents, Resident (R)1. R1 became a ward of the state on 01/22/2024 and although the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (indicating cognitively intact), the resident was legally deemed wholly disabled for managing both personal and financial resources, including the right to vote, and required supervision when leaving the facility. The facility, however, failed to ensure staff were aware the resident could not exit the facility unsupervised. On 11/27/2024, exact time unknown, R1 exited the facility through the main entrance after informing the employee working at the reception desk that she was going to step outside. The employee working the reception desk allowed R1 to exit the building. At approximately 12:15 PM, on the same day, R1 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, 2022, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During observation on 08/20/2024 of the kitchen walk in refrigerator, multiple produce items were rotting. Additionally, multiple sleeves of bread were found with no label or expiration date. Also, leftover tomatoes were observed in container with no use by date. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 02/2023, revealed all Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, were to be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. Further review revealed all foods were to be stored, wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the facility's policy, Food Storage: Dry Goods, revised 02/2023, revealed all dry goods were to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of standard of practice reference, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of six sampled residents, Resident (R) 65. Observation of medication administration revealed Registered Nurse (RN) 7 failed to perform hand hygiene after administering medications for the resident, and prior to preparing medications for another. The findings include: Review of the facility's reference book, Fundamentals of Nursing, 10th Edition, by [NAME] and [NAME], pages 439 and 618, revealed the most effective basic technique for preventing and controlling the transmission of infection was hand hygiene. Per review, hand hygiene was defined as a general term that applied to four techniques: handwashing, antiseptic hand wash, antiseptic hand rub, or surgical hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, personnel record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure it had a process in place to ensure contracted employees had the Kentucky Adult Caregiver Misconduct Registry checked as required by KRS 209.032 for 2 of 5 employee files sampled. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property revised 09/15/2023 revealed the facility included screening to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident residing in the facility. Continued review revealed the screening included conducting criminal background checks and a search of the State Nurse Aide Abuse Registry. Review further revealed however, the Kentucky Adult Caregiver Misconduct Registry (KACMR) checks were not included as part of the screening. Review of the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 209.032 revealed a vulnerable adult services provider, such as a long term care facility was to, Query as to whether prospective or current employee has validated substantiated finding of adult abuse, neglect, or exploitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with State and Federal laws for one (1) of three (3) facility medication storage refrigerators. In addition, the facility also failed to ensure medications were secured during medication administration for 1 medication cart. Observation of the medication room on the facility's 100 unit revealed a personal lunch bag with food and drinks stored inside the locked medication refrigerator located in the room. Additionally, observation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) 7 prepared a resident's medications, then stepped away from the medication cart leaving the pills in a medication cup unattended, and out of view of staff. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration, last revised 6/24/2024, revealed medications were administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. Continued review revealed medications were also administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-11-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy it was determined the facility failed to employ sufficient dietary staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition service for 96 residents nine (nine residents received tube feeding) of 105 residents who received meals at the facility. Review of the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, signed by the DON (Director of Nursing) on 11/12/19 revealed there were one hundred five (105) total residents and nine (9) residents received tube feeding. Observation and interview revealed there was not enough dietary staff to ensure meals were served to residents in a timely manner, per the facility posted meal times. (Refer to F809). In addition, resident food allergies and intolerances were not followed for Resident #79 with regards to gluten free diet and dietary staff interview revealed no training on gluten free diets. (Refer to F806). Frosted Spice Cake was not served per the menu on 11/12/19, per interview, due to lack of staff (Refer to F803). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-11-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care. Review of the facility posted Meal Times, which was not dated, revealed the lunch meal was to be served to the Gold/Main Dining Room at 12:30 PM. Observations during the meal service on 11/12/19 revealed the lunch meal was served late. Interviews with Resident's #18, #22, #28, and #155, revealed meals were often served late. Interview with Resident #155 revealed he/she would refuse prescribed short acting insulin until he/she knew for sure the trays were on the unit, due to the short acting insulin would make his/her sugar drop. The findings include: Review of the facility Meal Times, undated, revealed the lunch meal times for the Gold/Main Dining Room was at 12:30 PM. Further review revealed 200 Hall lunch was at 11:30 AM. Per the Meal Times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's Policies, it was determined the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observation of the kitchen, on 11/12/19 revealed low fat cottage cheese with an open date 10/27/19, and turkey, which was labeled with two labels, one label documenting use by 10/7/19 and one label with the date 11/5/19, and a use by date of 11/20/19. Continued observation revealed chocolate pudding, dated to use by 11/10/19, an opened gallon of 2 percent milk with manufacturer use by date of 11/10/19, and potato salad opened 11/07/19. Furthermore, observation on 11/12/19 revealed ground pepper and ginger powder opened with no date, ground cumin dated opened 05/15/18, Mediterranean ground oregano labeled 09/22/17, and black pepper, which was not dated and the label was such that the date received could not be read. Observations revealed sugar, rice and flour bins were observed with brown substance on the containers. Moreover, observations of the walk in freezer on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. (Refer to F689) Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #9 on 05/23/11. Record review revealed Resident #9 had diagnoses which included Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance; Displaced fracture of left radial styloid process, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing; Muscle weakness; and Difficulty in walking, not otherwise classified. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], a Significant Change assessment, revealed the facility assessed Resident #9 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of eleven (11) out of fifteen (15). Per the MDS Assessment, the facility assessed Resident #9 as independent with no setup or physical help from staff for ambulating in room and corridor. Continued review revealed Resident #9 was assessed as having one (1) fall with major injury since the prior assessment. Review of the Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/04/19, revealed the facility assessed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-11-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment and care for one (1) of the thirty (30) sampled residents, Resident #51. Resident #51 had a physician order to be sent to the emergency room because the resident had complained of chest pain and was not sent until the following day. The physician was not notified until the next day that Resident #51 did not go out to the emergency room as the physician had ordered. The findings include: Review of Resident #51's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident 06/16/17 and readmitted the resident on 10/21/19, with diagnosis of sepsis, pulmonary embolism, chronic respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, resident has intellectual diagnosis of borderline intellectual functioning, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #51's annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for two (2) of three (3) units. Observations and interviews revealed the facility had an odor of urine and the resident shower rooms for two (2) of three (3) units, had toilets with identified fecal matter. In addition, metal poles used in resident rooms were rusted and caked with white sticky matter. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy for homelike conditions upon request. Review of the facility's policy, Maintenance Service, dated January 2005, revealed the maintenance department was responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. Observation, on 11/12/19 at 09:50 AM, revealed physical entry to the 100 hallway had an odor of ammonia. Observation, on 11/12/19 at 10:48 AM, upon physical passage through the facility door to the residential area by the dining hall entrance, revealed a strong musty ammonia odor. Continued observation of the two-hundred (200) hallway again…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,364 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,182 — penalty dated 2025-01-03
• $5,182 — penalty dated 2025-01-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY