No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Signature Healthcare Of Norfolk

1005 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk, VA 23507 · For profit - Corporation · 169 certified beds · (757) 623-5602 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (757) 623-5602 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2019Resident-funds citation (F0567)3 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2019
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
902 Graydon Ave · (757) 622-1661 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
601 Childrens Ln · (757) 668-6877 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1320 Colonial Ave · (757) 533-9284 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 W Princess Anne Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.5%20.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.5%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.9%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.031.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.731.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 44.7–62.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.5–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting80.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.7–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
45.4%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 150.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-07-21)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2019-10-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, the facility staff failed to ensure the necessary treatment, care and services were provided to prevent development of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 63 residents (Resident #11), resulting in harm. Resident #11's sacral pressure ulcer was not identified until it was found at a stage 3. The findings included: Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #11 included but not limited to, *Pressure ulcer of other site, unspecified stage. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/22/19 coded the resident with a 14 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #11 requiring total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2018-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to prevent and identify in a timely manner, a pressure ulcer for 1 of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident #108, resulting in harm. The facility staff failed to identify Resident #108 had developed a sacral pressure ulcer until it had advanced to a stage 3; measuring 6 centimeters by 4 centimeters by 0.1 centimeters, with dark pink tissue, slough, and right side rolled edges with maceration, which constitutes harm. The findings included: Resident #108 was originally admitted to the facility 4/23/18 and readmitted [DATE] from a local acute care hospital, after repair of a hip fracture. The current diagnoses included; a left hip fracture, advanced dementia and an anxiety disorder. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/31/18 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2018-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 38 residents (#9 and # 25) in the survey sample were free of accident hazards 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #9 was free of accident hazards due to the resident sustaining second degree burns to the upper chest from hot liquids (a cup of noodle soup), which constituted harm for this resident. 2. The facility staff failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for one resident (#25) in the survey sample when she ingested paint left accessible to her by a contracted painting company. The findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the nursing facility on 4/4/14 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and severe morbid obesity. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an Annual and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible 15 which indicated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity by not ensuring the residents' rights to retain personal possessions for two of two sampled residents (Residents (R)52 and R82) reviewed for resident rights. This failure had the possibility to have a negative impact on numerous residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of R52's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, heart failure, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, aphasia, and anxiety disorder. Review of R52's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 05/31/23, located under the RAI tab indicated R52 was extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received written discharge notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for four (Resident (R)119, R15, R64, and R70) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer/Discharge Notice dated 11/01/22 revealed for the Emergent Transfers to Acute Care section, the facility will send a written notice of discharge to the resident and/or resident representative when the resident was transferred/discharged to the hospital. 1. Review of Resident 119's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/16/23 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. On 07/18/23 at 1:48 PM, R119 was asked if she was sent to the hospital recently and she stated she had and that she did not get a written transfer. Review of the Census tab of Resident 119's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on family interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to invite 1 out of 50 resident (Resident #46) or their Responsible Representative (RR) to attend their person-centered care plan meeting. The findings included: Resident #46 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 05/14/21. Diagnosis for Resident #46 included but not limited to acute subdural hemorrhage, dementia with behavioral disturbance and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/28/23 coded Resident #46 with a 03 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. A phone interview was conducted with Resident #46's Responsible Representative (RR) on 07/19/23 at approximately 12:51 p.m. He stated he had never been invited to attend a care plan meeting for Resident #46. An interview was conducted with the Director of Social Services on 07/21/23 at 3:21 p.m. She stated she was not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 59 residents (Resident #236) in the survey sample were free of significant medication errors. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the significant medication Lopressor (used to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg was administered twice a day to Resident #326 from 11/14/20 through 11/20/20. Resident #236 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to an acute care setting on 11/24/20. The resident did not return to the nursing facility. Diagnosis included but are not limited to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #236's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/17/20 coded Resident #236's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 15 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #236's person-centered care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to immediately inform the physician of the need to assess/evaluate, start, or alter treatment when there was a significant deterioration in the resident's condition for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #46) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #46 had four (4) falls between 04/24/23 - 05/22/23 and during that time she had behavioral and neurological changes. She was at risk for major injury related to being on an anticoagulation medication (blood thinner), independent with ambulation, and a diagnosis of dementia. The resident was not assessed after significant behavioral and neurological changes were identified. The resident was transferred to the local emergency room (ER), and diagnosed with subdural hematoma/hemorrhage. Resident #46 was transferred via 911 (emergent) to the local hospital on [DATE] due to acute left-sided weakness and altered mental status following a ground-level fall at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the sink in Resident #120's room drained after use for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #120), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #120 was originally admitted to the facility 3/8/23 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident had never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; high blood pressure, high cholesterol and hypothyroidism. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/13/23 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #120's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring physical help of one person with bathing, limited assistance of one person with dressing, supervision of one person with transfers, locomotion, toileting, and personal hygiene, independent after set-up with eating and walking, and independent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident interview, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assist and develop a discharge plan for a resident to make a successful discharge into the community after the initial option failed for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #114), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #114 was originally admitted to the facility 11/2/22 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included diabetes and bilateral above the knee amputations secondary to peripheral vascular disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/2/23 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #114's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bathing, extensive assistance of one person with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a dependent resident's activities of daily living (ADL) were completed for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility 7/19/22 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; malnutrition, hyperparathyroidism, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/7/23 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bathing and toileting, extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, personal hygiene and dressing, and supervision after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services to monitor, assess and treat one resident timely who presented with sign and symptoms and complications of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 out 59 residents (Resident #46) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #46 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 05/14/21. Diagnosis for Resident #46 included but not limited to acute subdural hemorrhage, dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) a significant change assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/12/23 coded Resident #46 with a 03 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS coded Resident #46 total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use and supervision with one assist with eating for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to handle, prepare and store food in a manner to prevent foodborne illness potentially affecting all residents. The findings included: During the Initial Kitchen Inspection at 10:31 A.M. on 10/22/19 a side salad with a use by date of 10/14/19 was observed in the two door glass refrigerator. Shredded cheese with a use by date of 10/09/19 was observed in the two door glass refrigerator. A French Silk Pie with a use by date of 10/09/19 was observed in the two door glass refrigerator. A container of Tuna with a use by date of 10/10/19 was observed in the two door glass refrigerator. A bag of cooked link sausage with a use by date of 10/19/19 was observed in the two glass refrigerator. A plastic scoop was observed in a 50 pound bag of sugar with the scoop was touching the sugar. The bag was not sealed nor in a container. Boxes of food items were stored on the floor of the dry storage room. The floor was noted to have dirt, debris, spilled food crumbs and paper. Two male staff members were observed in the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control system/program potentially affecting all residents. The findings included: During the kitchen inspection on 10/22/19 at 10:31 A.M. house flies were observed in the kitchen area. Drain flies were observed in the mop room and dishwasher room. Fruit flies and house flies were observed in the conference room. House flies were observed in the dining room area. Flies were observed on all units. During an interview on 10/23/19 at 3:50 P.M. with the Maintenance Director he stated, the drain flies, fruit flies and house flies have been a concern and there is a need for pest control. The Maintenance Director stated The Pest Control company comes out to service the facility. The Maintenance Director stated the flies will be in the building like this until it turns cold out side. A review of the Pest Management policy indicated: Mission-We shall first seek to understand the unique needs of each customer, formulate effective solutions, and implement the actions in a timely professional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were able to formulate advance directives, obtain advance directives, and/or send them upon transfer to hospital; and have these documents maintained in the clinical record, readily accessible to the direct care staff for 16 of 63 residents in the survey sample (#64, #95, #128, 78, #11, #51, #50, #15, #90, #42, #88, #61, #72, #61, #139 and #124). The findings include: 1. Resident #64 did not have an advance directive readily available for direct care staff. Upon inquiry, an advance directive was located in a file drawer in the business office, not in the clinical record. Additionally, there was no evidence the resident's advance directive was sent with her when the resident was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] or [DATE]. Resident #64 was admitted to the nursing facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, bipolar disease and schizophrenia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation review and the facility's policy; the facility's staff failed to covey a copy of the resident's comprehensive care plan goals to the transferring facility for 10 of 63 residents (Resident #88, #112, #78, #64, #95, #128, #32, #11, #94, and #605) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility's policy titled Discharge or Transfer Summary (Last Revision date: 06/28/19). Guidelines include but not limited to: -1. G: For the residents transferred to another provider the following will be documented and communicated to the receiver provider: Comprehensive Care Plan goals. 1. Resident #88 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 8/1/19. Resident #88's diagnoses included paraplegia, multiple sclerosis and anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/16/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation review and the facility's policy; the facility's staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or resident representative explaining how a resident's bed is held while the resident is absent from the facility due to hospitalization for 9 of 63 residents (Resident #88, #112, #78, #64, #95, #128, #11, #94 and #605) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #88 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 8/1/19. Resident #88's diagnoses included paraplegia, multiple sclerosis and anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/16/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #88's cognitive abilities for daily decision making are intact. Review of the clinical record reveal Resident #88 was discharged from the facility return anticipated to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, family interview, facility documentation review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan as their condition changed for 5 of 63 residents (Resident #88, #112, #11, #94 and #105) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #88 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 8/1/19. Resident #88's diagnoses included paraplegia, multiple sclerosis and anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/16/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #88's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care with eating, personal hygiene and bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, extensive assistance of one with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure dialysis services to include ongoing communication with the dialysis center was in place for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #18. The findings included: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease and Schizoaffective Disorder Resident #18 attended dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturdays. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a Quarterly with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/19. Resident #18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Under Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs Resident #18 was coded for Dialysis while a resident. On 10/22/19 at approximately 1:00 P.M. the resident was not observed in the facility and the staff stated she was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, resident interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that the physician was notified of a positive urine culture in a timely manner for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #78. The findings included: Resident #78 was a [AGE] year old originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Urine Retention and Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/6/19. Resident #78's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 13 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #78's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: 10/15/2019 15:46 (3:46 P.M.): urinalysis results received and placed in md (medical doctor) folder, greater than 100,000 gram negative rods, resident positive for uti (urinary tract infection), urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on identified quality deficiencies determined during this survey the QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) committee failed to develop and implement an appropriate plan of action to correct repeat harm deficiencies in the area of Quality of Care-Pressure Injuries affecting 1 of 63 residents and potentially affecting all residents. The findings included: The facility was cited with harm in the area of Quality of Care for Pressure Injuries during the last survey ending 7/13/18. During the current survey, the facility was cited with a level 3 isolated (G) harm deficiency in the same area. The plan of correction for the last survey did not correct the deficient practice.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) meetings were conducted as required and required members were in attendance. The findings included: During the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) review conducted on 10/24/19 at approximately 6:30 p.m., the Administrator was asked to provide evidence of quarterly QAA meetings to include the sign in sheets. The Administrator stated that he had identified that the facility QAA committee was lacking in participation from all department heads. He stated they have QAPI every month and revamped the QAPI process. The Administrator stated he did not have all the sign in sheets to show evidence of quarterly QAA committee attendance. The third quarter July 2019 QAPI meeting signature sheet did not have the Medical Director or his/her designee in attendance. No other information was provided to the survey team about the facility's QAPI quarterly meetings prior to exit.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure privacy curtains were maintained in a sanitary condition in three resident rooms which included 6 of 169 beds. The findings included: On 10/22/19, 10/23/19 and 10/24/19 the privacy curtains in rooms 205, 206 and 208 were observed with visible stains; and food debris was noted on the curtains in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 10/24/19 at approximately 10:00 a.m., an Environmental Services Staff (other staff #12) was asked how often are privacy curtains cleaned. He stated whenever the housekeeping staff let him know. He was asked to check the three rooms with the dirty curtains, he stated they need to be changed out. The Housekeeping Staff (other staff #11) who was responsible for cleaning the rooms on that hallway was interviewed. She was asked the process on how dirty privacy curtains get changed. She stated that if she finds any privacy curtains that need to be cleaned she writes them down and forwards the information. She was asked about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #20) in the survey sample had a patient trust fund account. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #20 had a patient trust fund account. Resident #20 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #20 included but not limited to: Mild Intellectual disabilities. Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/02/19 coded Resident #20's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 99 indicating short and long term memory problems and with severe cognitive impairment - never/rarely made decisions. An interview was conducted with Resident #20 on 10/22/19 at approximately 11:53 p.m. She said the facility would not put money in her account until her niece got involved. She said her niece was putting money into her account every month. An interview was conducted with the Business Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure care equipment, a wheelchair and gel cushion, were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The findings included: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admit on 2/7/17 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, major depression, and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment date of 8/16/19 coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. The resident was identified as utilizing a wheelchair for mobility and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 10/22/19 at 12:03 p.m., Resident #51 was observed in bed. She stated she did not sleep well last night and was not going to get up today. A strong smell of urine was in the room. An inspection to identify the origin of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Facility Reported Incident, staff interview and the clinical record, facility staff failed to ensure that one of 63 residents was free from sexual abuse. The findings include: Resident # 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission occurring on 11/15/2018 with the latest diagnosis including, but not limited to, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, cervical spina bifida without hydrocephalus, unspecified convulsions conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions. Resident # 90's MDS (Minimum Data Set), Quarterly Review Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 9/18/2019 coded Resident #90 with a BIM (Brief Interview of Mental Status) as 14 out of a possible 15, cognitively intact with decisions of daily living. A review of Resident #90 Care Plan indicated limitations in ease of joining other residents in activities with a long term goal to express satisfaction with activity involvement; and, limited ability to maintain grooming/personal hygiene with a long term goal to be well…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that a Baseline Care Plan was developed for 1 of 63 resident's in the survey sample, Resident #155. The findings included: Resident #155 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay with diagnoses to include but not limited to Dementia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Resident #155's Facility Face Sheet was reviewed and documented in part, as follows: admit date : [DATE] discharged : 5/20/2019 Resident #155's Electronic Medical Record was reviewed for the Baseline Care Plan and was not identified. On 10/24/19 12:06 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Social Worker as to if a baseline care plan was completed. The Social Worker stated, No I cannot find a baseline care plan, the admitting nurse should have done it on admission. I guess it wasn't done because she was a respite resident we don't normally do them for respite stays. On 10/24/19 at approximately 2:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to address Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 63 resident's in the survey sample, Resident #403. The findings included: Resident #403 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Dementia and Cerebral Infarction. Resident #403's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/13/2019 coded Resident #403 with short term memory problems and long term memory problems and with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #403 as requiring limited assistance of 1 with transfer, extensive assistance of 1 with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene, and total dependence of 1 for toilet use and bathing. On 10/24/2019 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #403's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and did not include information communicating the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practices for 1 out of 63 residents (Resident #11) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to obtain physician orders for a newly developed stage III sacral pressure ulcer for Resident #11. The findings included: Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #11 included but not limited to *Pressure ulcer of other site, unspecified stage. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/22/19, coded the resident with a 14 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #11 requiring total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene for Activities of Daily Living care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that Discharge Planning was implemented for 1 of 63 resident's in the survey sample, Resident #155. The findings included: Resident #155 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay with diagnoses to include but not limited to, Dementia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Resident #155's Facility Face Sheet was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: admit date : [DATE] discharged : 5/20/2019 Resident #155's Electronic Medical Record was reviewed for Discharge Planning and there were none identified. On 10/24/19 at 12:06 P.M. an interview was conducted with the Social Worker regarding Resident #155's Discharge Planning. The Social Worker stated There was no discharge planning completed because she was respite and we knew she would be going back home and the PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly) would be in place . On 10/24/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that a Discharge Summary was completed at discharge for 1 of 63 resident's in the survey sample, Resident #155. The findings included: Resident #155 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay with diagnoses to include but not limited to, Dementia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Resident #155's Facility Face Sheet was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: admit date : [DATE] discharged : 5/20/2019 Resident #155's Electronic Medical Record was reviewed for the Discharge Summary but one was not identified. On 10/24/19 12:06 P.M. an interview was conducted with the Social Worker regarding Resident #155's Discharge Summary. The Social Worker stated, There is no discharge summary, we didn't do one. I guess it wasn't done because she was a respite resident. On 10/24/19 at approximately 2:10 P.M. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, family interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 16 residents in the survey sample was free from an avoidable fall from the bed during the provision of care, Resident #113. The findings included: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke, contracture of left arm, and muscle weakness. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment reference date of 9/10/19 coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating the resident's cognition was intact. The resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene and was totally dependent on two staff for transfers. The Comprehensive person centered plan of care identified the resident was a fall risk and had a history of a total of two falls in addition to the current fall on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the physician orders to obtain weekly weights for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #94. The findings included: Resident #94 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission date of 9/3/19 with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, and schizophrenia. The current Minimum Data Set an annual with an assessment reference date of 9/17/19 coded the resident as scoring a 9 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The resident's weight was 109 pounds. The physician orders dated 9/3/19 directed the staff to obtain the resident's weight on admission and then weekly for four weeks following a hospitalization. The clinical record evidenced the resident's weight was obtained on 9/4/19 at 108.6 pounds, and 9/11/19 at 108.8 pounds, there were no other weekly weights obtained. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to follow the physician order for the oxygen flow rate for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #94. The findings included: Resident #94 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission date of 9/3/19 with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The current Minimum Data Set an annual with an assessment reference date of 9/17/19 coded the resident as scoring a 9 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The resident was coded as receiving oxygen therapy. The comprehensive person-centered plan of care dated 9/25/19 identified as a problem, that the resident requires oxygen therapy related to COPD. The goal was that the resident will not exhibit signs of hypoxia (low levels of oxygen). One of the approaches was to administer oxygen at 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review the facility's staff failed to ensure the medication Procrit (a red blood cell producing drug) was available to be administered as ordered to 1 of 63 residents (Resident #88) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #88 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and with a readmission date of 8/1/19. Resident #88's diagnoses included anemia, paraplegia, multiple sclerosis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/16/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #88's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. Review of the current physician order summary revealed Resident #88 had an order dated 9/20/19 for Procrit 10,000 units/milliliter injection once per week on Mondays between 7:15 a.m., and 11:00 a.m., for anemia. PROCRIT is indicated for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review the facility's staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #88) in the survey sample was free from significant medication error. The findings included: Resident #88 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 8/1/19. Resident #88's diagnoses included anemia, paraplegia, multiple sclerosis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/16/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #88's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. Review of the current physician order summary revealed Resident #88 had an order dated 9/20/19 for Procrit (a red blood cell producing drug) 10,000 units/milliliter injection once per week on Mondays between 7:15 a.m., and 11:00 a.m., for anemia. PROCRIT is indicated for the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate medical record for 1 of 63 residents (Resident #304) in the survey sample. The findings include: Resident #304 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Adrenomyeloneurpathy, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Jewish Family Services was Resident #304's court appointed Legal Guardian. Resident #304 expired in the facility on [DATE]. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a Quarterly with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE]. Resident #18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #304's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: [DATE] 9:30 A.M.: Resident LOA (leave of absence) to urology appointment via stretcher. NAD (no apparent distress) noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during wound care for 1 of 63 residents, Resident #32. The Findings included: Resident #32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #32 included but not limited to Pressure Ulcer of unspecified buttock stage 2 and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/02/19 coded the resident with a staff assessment for mental status because resident was unable to complete the interview. Staff assessment for mental status coded the resident as having short-term and long-term memory problems. On 10/23/19 at approximately 10:46 AM wound care observation was conducted. The wound care nurse Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 sanitized the resident's bedside table, allowed it to dry, placed a drape on the table, and added wound care items. After the completion of wound care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-07-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide notice of Bed Hold and Reserve Bed Payment Policy for five Residents (Resident #6, #82, #89, #1, #108 ) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to provide notice of Bed Hold and Reserve Bed Payment Policy to Resident #6 upon discharge to the hospital. 2. The facility staff failed to provide notice of Bed Hold and Reserve Bed Payment Policy to Resident #82 upon discharge to the hospital. 3. The facility staff failed to provide notice of Bed Hold and Reserve bed Payment Policy to Resident #89 upon discharge to the hospital. 4. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #1 was made aware of the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer/discharge to the hospital on 1/23/18 and 6/12/18. 5. The facility staff failed to provide notice of Bed Hold and Reserve Bed Payment Policy to Resident #108 upon discharge to the hospital. The findings included: 1. Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biological were secured and stored and discarded per professional guidelines. 1. The facility staff failed to discard 3 expired Culture Swab Collection and Transport System tubes that were located in the medication room on Unit 2. 2. The facility staff failed to discard an expired Lantus insulin located in the medication cart on Unit 2 (Long hall medication cart). 3. The facility staff failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when not in direct site of the nurse for 1 of 3 units (Unit 3). 4. The facility staff failed to assure medications were secure and inaccessible to Resident #139 who ingested anti-fungal ointment. 5. The facility staff failed to ensure that 3 medications supplied by the Resident #13's family were stored appropriately and not left at the resident's bedside. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at approximately 8:15 a.m., the Medication Storage Room on Unit 3 was inspected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-07-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 2 of 38 residents (Resident #101 and 126) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) letter to Resident #101 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. 2. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) letter to Resident #126 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. The findings included: 1. Resident #101 was readmitted to the nursing facility on 02/13/18. Diagnosis for Resident #101 included but not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease - stage IV (kidney failure). Resident #101's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 5/23/18 coded Resident #101 a 3 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated the resident with severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately complete each required section of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 2 out of 38 residents (Resident #126 & #135) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to complete the required section of Resident #126 quarterly MDS: section C-Brief Interview for Mental Status. 2. The facility staff failed to code Resident #135 for hospice care. The findings included: Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #126 included but are not limited to Hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #126 MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/25/18 coded the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 11 of a possible 15 with moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the quarterly MDS with ARD of 06/13/18 noted it was marked with dashes under section C-Brief Interview for Mental Status. On 07/12/18 at 8:10 a.m., an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility document review and staff interviews the facility failed to revise the Person Centered Care Plan's for 2 of 38 Resident's in the Survey Sample, Resident #34 and Resident #108. 1. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #34's Person Centered Care Plan in the area of Activities to include the resident's assessed activities of preference. 2. The facility staff failed to review effectiveness of interventions and review/revise Resident #108's person centered care plan after a fall resulting in a left hip fracture. The Findings Included: 1. Resident #34 is a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility 4/26/16 with diagnoses to include Depression and Dementia. The most recent Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/3/18. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #34 was attempted but unable to be completed by the Resident. Under Section C Cognitive Patterns Resident #34 was coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-10-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that the daily Nursing Staffing Information to include worked hours were posted daily potentially affecting all residents. The findings included: On 10/22/19 the posted Daily Staffing document was observed in the front lobby. The Daily Staffing document did not include the actual hours worked for that day. On 10/23/19 the posted Daily Staffing document was observed in the front lobby. The Daily Staffing document did not include the actual hours worked for that day. On 10/24/19 the posted Daily Staffing document was observed in the front lobby. The Daily Staffing document did not include the actual hours worked for that day. On 10/24/19 at 9:29 A.M. an interview was conducted with the Facility Scheduler regarding the posted Daily Nursing Staffing. The Facility Scheduler was informed that the Posted Nursing Staffing for past 3 days was missing nursing worked hours. The Facility Scheduler stated, I don't ever put the hours on the posting until the next day because of callouts, so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-10-24 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to make 3 years of survey results and corresponding plans of correction available for review, in a 169 bed facility with a census of 156. The findings include: An initial inspection of the facility on October 22, 2019 through October 24, 2019, revealed that the facility survey manual contained 2 out of the required 3 years of survey results. During an interview on October 23, 2019 at approximately 4:30 p.m. the Facility Administrator was asked how many survey results were provided for resident/public review, answered 2 years. The Administrator was informed that the requirement is 3 years of survey results and corresponding corrective action plans, responded, I'll get right on that. The Facility Resident Handbook states, the facility is subject to visits by federal, state and other regulatory officials. These representatives may review medical records and other written information pursuant to the inspection of the facility for continued certification and licensure. The results of the most recent federal and state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of hospital discharges for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11. The findings included: Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #11 included but not limited to Thromobocytopenia. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/22/19 coded the resident with a 14 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. On 09/16/19, according to the facility's documentation, Resident #11, left the facility via ambulance service as a direct admit to the hospital, pending a surgical procedure. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 09/16/19 - discharged with return anticipated. An interview was conducted with the Social Worker on 10/24/19 at approximately 9:30 a.m., who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review , it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected Resident #42's status, 1 of 63 resident's in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to Anemia and Hypertension. Resident #42's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/09/2019 coded Resident #42 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/24/2019 review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS, Section K0300 - Weight Loss, revealed that the resident was coded as Yes, on physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. On 10/24/2019 Resident #42's Physician Order Summary was reviewed. There was no evidence that the resident had orders to be on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. On 10/24/2019 at 5:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Danville Centre for Health & RehabilitationDanville, KY 1 of 5Liberty Care & Rehabilitation CenterLiberty, KY 1 of 5Mayfair ManorLexington, KY 1 of 5Signature Health Of Portland Rehab & Wellness CentPortland, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of BremenBremen, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ErinErin, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of MuncieMuncie, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Putnam CountyCookeville, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Terre HauteTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Colonial Rehab & WellnessBardstown, KY 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Heritage Hall Rehab & WellLawrenceburg, KY 1 of 5Sunrise Manor Nursing HomeHodgenville, KY 2 of 5Fountain Circle Care & Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, KY 2 of 5Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCalvert City, KY 2 of 5Rockcastle Health & Rehabilitation CenterBrodhead, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClarksvilleClarksville, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Fentress CountyJamestown, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at North Hardin Rehab & WellnRadcliff, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at Summerfield Rehab & WellneLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of East LouisvilleLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of ElizabethtownElizabethtown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of GeorgetownGeorgetown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of McCreary County Rehab andPine Knot, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Roanoke RapidsRoanoke Rapids, NC 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Spencer CountyTaylorsville, KY 3 of 5Harrodsburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5Lee County Care & Rehabilitation CenterBeattyville, KY 3 of 5Morgantown Care & Rehabilitation CenterMorgantown, KY 3 of 5Pickett Care And Rehabilitation CenterByrdstown, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & WellnessMonteagle, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&wellness CtrRidgely, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & WeSouth Pittsburg, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at HillcrestOwensboro, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at Jackson Manor Rehab and WeAnnville, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of KinstonKinston, NC 3 of 5Spring City Care And Rehabilitation CenterSpring City, TN 3 of 5Westmoreland Care & Rehab CtrWestmoreland, TN 4 of 5Bluegrass Care & Rehabilitation CenterLexington, KY

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHC LP HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2014
JJLA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 08/01/2014
LPSNF LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST72%since 08/01/2014
WHEATEN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 08/01/2014
STEIER III, ELMERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 08/01/2014
DRAKE, CIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/24/2023
HARRISON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2014

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 4%Other / private 8%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$295per resident / day
operating cost
$8,966per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$268per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495068. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-07-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next