No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunrise Manor Nursing Home

717 North Lincoln Boulevard, Hodgenville, KY 42748 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 137 certified beds · (270) 358-3103 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
4 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
207 W Main St · (270) 358-3829 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
415 N Lincoln Blvd · (270) 358-3186 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
93 Shawnee Dr · (270) 358-3705 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Hodgenville City Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1136 Old Elizabethtown Rd · (270) 358-9812

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.4%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.1%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.5%29.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.7%19.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.5%16.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.1%83.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.7%24.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.941.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.742.141.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 39.5–53.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 10.0–18.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 5.7–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.90
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
50.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 126.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-04-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the facility's Administrator's Job Description, it was determined the facility failed to be administered in a manner which enabled effective use of its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's administration failed to ensure thorough actions were taken after the 02/25/2021 misappropriate/drug diversion involving eight (8) residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents to prevent falls for a resident assessed as a high risk for falls. Additionally, the facility's administration failed to maintain substantial compliance, after the 01/24/2019, Recertification Survey, in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656, F657); 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Life (F689); and 42 CFR 483.45 Pharmacy Services (F755). Further, the facility's administration failed to maintain substantial compliance, after the 11/05/2019, Abbreviated Survey, in the areas of CFR 483.12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-04-14 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility's Governing Body failed to ensure facility policies were implemented regarding management and operation of the facility. The Governing Body failed to ensure compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 482.12 Freedom from Abuse, F600, F602, and F610; 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, F655, F656, F657; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, F689; 42 CFR 483.45 Pharmacy Services, F755; CRF 42 483.60 Food and Nutrition Services, F812; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration, F835 and F837; 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance, F867; and 42 CFR 483.80 Infection Prevention and Control, F880 during the Recertification Survey 03/20/2022 through 04/14/2022. Continued non-compliance was cited during this Survey at 42 CFR 482.12 Freedom from Abuse, F610; 42 CFR 483.20; 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, F656, F657; and 42 CFR 483.45 Pharmacy Services, F755. The facility failure to provide oversight to ensure compliance has caused or is likely to cause serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-04-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the facility's Plans of Correction (POC) submitted for the 01/24/2019 and 11/05/2019 surveys, it was determined the facility failed to have effective processes in place to address system failures through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. As a result, the facility failed to identify quality of care deficiencies; failed to develop and implement plans of action to correct identified quality of care deficiencies; and failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. This was evidenced by deficient practice cited at F656, F657, F689, and F755, on the 01/24/2019 survey; and F610, and F656, which were cited on the 11/05/2019 survey. During the 04/14/2022 Recertification Survey, Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified at 42 CFR 483.12 Freedom from Abuse (F602), at a scope and severity (S/S) of K; 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656), at a S/S of J; 42 CFR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Resident Assessment Instrument Manual 3.0, it was determined the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) which included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (2) of seventy-one (71) sampled residents (Residents #12 and #49) 1. Review of Resident #49's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revealed an intervention to place the resident near the nurses' station when out of bed on 09/08/2020. On 05/28/2021, the facility added the intervention to keep the resident near the nurses' station when up in the wheelchair (w/c). On 09/27/2021, the facility initiated the intervention for the resident to be in the direct view of staff when up in the w/c. However, record review and staff interviews revealed they would be busy and unable to monitor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the facility's fall investigation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine maintenance of assistive devices to prevent an avoidable accident for one (1) of thirty-one (31) sampled residents, Resident #82. On 12/06/18, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 was pulling the resident backwards in a shower chair, over a lip in the floor, and the chair broke causing the resident to fall and sustain a broken hip. Interview and record review revealed a thorough investigation had not been completed because the shower chair was not fully examined in order to determine how it had malfunctioned. Interview and record review also revealed the shower chair had not been routinely checked by maintenance per the facility's policy and procedures. In addition, interview revealed staff had not been trained on how to maneuver the shower chair safely over the lip in the floor and the incident had not been reviewed by the Quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 127 of the facility's 127 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage: Dry Goods and Cold Foods, revised 09/2017, stated all foods will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. FDA Food Code states, 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under S3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C) of this section, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: (1) At 57 C (135 F) or above, except that roasts cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in 3-401.11(B) or reheated as specified in 3-403.11(E) may be held at a temperature of 54 C (130 F) or above; (2) At 5 C (41 F) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to store, handle, prepare, distribute, serve food, maintain safe temperatures of food in storage, in order to ensure food safety. Observation, on 03/20/2022 during the initial kitchen tour at 2:00 PM, revealed dirty floors, staff members with their masks positioned below the nose, open food not labeled or dated, a dirty stove, pitchers of tea and coffee uncovered and not labeled, a trash can with its lid open, the dishwasher was broken, the sanitizing solution in the three (3) compartment sink and the sanitizing bucket were not maintained at the correct concentration. Additionally, observation, on 03/20/2022, revealed inconsistencies with documentation logs for the standing refrigerator and dry storage, and the dishwasher was not in use/broken. Further observation, on 03/21/2022 at 11:35 AM, during lunch meal service, revealed two (2) male staff with hair on their face and neck with no beard restraint, and another staff person was observed with the mask below the nose. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, review of the Centers' for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines; and the CDC's website, HTTPS://www/Coronavirus, it was determined the facility failed to implement the CDC's and CMS's interventions to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, and sanitary environment to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases including COVID-19. Total census was 97. Observations on 03/20/2022, revealed staff did not use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in residents' rooms, who were under Droplet Precautions and Contact Precautions. Resident #299 and Resident #12 had Physician's Orders to be in isolation. However, observations revealed the facility's staff entered Resident #299's and Resident #12's room without donning (putting on) PPE required in order to enter the room. An additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Baseline Care Plan was developed and implemented to provide effective person-centered care for one (1) of seventy-one (71) sampled residents (Resident #299). Resident #299's Baseline Care Plan, initiated on 03/17/2022, revealed the resident required isolation as warranted per the resident's condition. However, the facility failed to further implement the Baseline Care Plan to include interventions related to Resident #299's Droplet Precaution isolation. Observations on 03/20/2022, revealed staff entered the resident's room to provide care without appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Further observations on 03/20/2022 revealed staff exited the resident's room without following proper infection control guidelines. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plan Process, dated 07/18/2018, revealed the charge nurse who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity for four (4) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Residents #19, #74, #88, and #91. Interviews revealed the facility failed to meet the personal care needs of the residents in a timely manner. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised 08/16/18, revealed all residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. The residents' rights were protected and promoted by the facility in a manner that maintained or enhanced the residents' quality of life. When staff provided care and services, they respected the residents' individuality and valued their input by providing a dignified existence, through self-determination and communication, and with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. Observation of the first floor north hall, on 01/23/19 at 9:39 AM, revealed the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy and resident rights, it was determined the facility failed to invite one (1) of two (2) sampled residents, Resident #91, to participate in his/her care plan conference. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 07/19/18, revealed the resident and the representative participated in the interdisciplinary team meeting as much as practicable for the resident and the representative. Each resident had the right to participate in choosing his/her treatment options, and was able to participate in the development, review, and revision of their care plan and was considered part of the interdisciplinary team. When a resident refused to participate in the development of the care plan, the facility staff entered the appropriate documentation into the resident's medical record. Review of the facility's Resident Rights, revised on 08/16/18, revealed the resident had a right to participate in decisions and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's Census and Conditions, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient amount of nursing staff to meet resident needs for eight (8) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #16, #19, #28, #64 #74, #88, #91, and #102. Nursing staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner to address the residents' needs. The findings include: Review of the facility's Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 01/21/19, revealed the facility had one hundred and twenty-three (123) residents. One hundred and eight (108) residents required the assist of one (1) or two (2) staff for transferring and toilet use. Review of the facility's Weekly Schedule, dated 01/11/19 to 01/17/19, revealed on 01/11/19, the facility scheduled sixteen (16) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA); however, review of the facility's Punch Variances Report (time staff clocked in/out) revealed only nine (9) CNAs worked. Continued review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were maintained to account for controlled drugs for five (5) of eight (8) medication carts. Record review revealed missing staff signatures on the controlled drug accountability forms, which were used to count and reconcile controlled drugs at shift change. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy for controlled medication accountability. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Accountability Count form, dated January 2013, revealed the form was used to verify controlled drugs on hand had been counted, and each medication count was in agreement with the quantity stated on Controlled Drug Record(s). The form was to be dated, the shift identified, and signed by the on-coming nurse and the off-going nurse. Review of the Controlled Substance Accountability Count form, dated January 2019, for the Rehab Unit, revealed missing staff signatures on 01/02/19 at 7:00 AM, 01/03/19 at 7:00 PM, 01/04/19 at 7:00 PM, 01/05/19 at 7:00 PM, 01/07/19 at 7:00 PM, 01/08/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure refrigerated narcotics were stored in a permanent affixed compartment in the medication refrigerators in two (2) of four (4) medication rooms. In addition, the medication refrigerators were small and not secured and could be removed from the medication rooms. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy for the security of refrigerated scheduled medications or medication refrigerators. Observation of the second floor south hall medication room, on 01/24/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed a small locked medication refrigerator not affixed to the wall or to a counter. The refrigerator contained Dronabinol (scheduled III medication) 2.5 milligrams (mg) tablets, not secured in a separate affixed box in the refrigerator. Further observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 picked up the small refrigerator and moved off the cart toward the door. Observation of the second floor north hall medication room, on 01/24/19 at 11:34 AM, revealed a small locked medication refrigerator not affixed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for two (2) of thirty-one (31) sampled residents, Resident #55 and #102. Observation and interview revealed Resident #55's mattress was deteriorated, and the soap holder in Resident #102's shower was broken with sharp, protruding edges. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy pertaining to resident mattresses. Review of the facility's policy, Maintenance Service, dated January 2005, revealed the maintenance department was responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. The maintenance department would maintain the building in good repair and free from hazards. 1. Interview with Resident #55, on 01/21/19 at 3:00 PM, revealed his/her mattress was broken down and hurt his/her back. Observation, on 01/21/19 at 3:12 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #4 revealed Resident #55's mattress's outer waterproof cover was worn off, exposing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to follow the care plan for four (4) of thirty-one (31) sampled residents, Resident #19, #88, #91, and #168. The facility care planned for staff to assist with Activities of Daily Living needs; however, interviews revealed staff failed to meet the needs of the residents timely. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 07/19/18, revealed the care plan included objectives and timetables to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs. In addition, the care plan included how the facility would assist the resident to meet their needs, goals, and preferences and aided the resident in reducing declines in functional status and/or functional levels. 1. Review of Resident #168's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/10/19, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to revise the care plan for one (1) of thirty-one (31) sampled residents, Resident #316. Resident #316 sustained a non-injury fall on 01/20/19, and the facility failed to revise the care plan after the fall with interventions to prevent further falls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans dated 09/21/16, revealed a person-centered comprehensive care plan that included measureable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs was developed for each resident. The care plan included how the facility would assist the resident to meet their needs, goals, and preference. The care plans were ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition changed. The nurse/Interdisciplinary Team was responsible for the review and updating of care plans. The care plan should reflect the status of the resident and updated with changes in the resident status and when residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to toilet for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #168, who was unable to toilet himself/herself. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy for provision of Activities of Daily Living. Record review for Resident #168 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/10/19, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty Walking. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident required the assistance of one (1) staff for transfers, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing, and the resident was occasionally incontinent of urine. The facility assessed the resident with Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was not interviewable. Review of the facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Care Record, dated January 2019, revealed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services related to enteral feeding (directly into the stomach) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #110. Observation of the resident's tube feeding bags revealed there was no label to include the resident's name, date, time, or initials of staff that hung the tube-feeding. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Gastrostomy Feeding, reviewed 06/05/18, revealed feeding administration systems were to be changed every twenty-four (24) hours. The piston syringe was to be replaced every twenty-four (24) hours. Review of the facility's policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised October 2018, revealed an element of the infection control program was the prevention of infections, which included instituting measures to prevent complications, education, and ensuring staff adhered to proper techniques…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Danville Centre for Health & RehabilitationDanville, KY 1 of 5Liberty Care & Rehabilitation CenterLiberty, KY 1 of 5Mayfair ManorLexington, KY 1 of 5Signature Health Of Portland Rehab & Wellness CentPortland, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of BremenBremen, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ErinErin, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of MuncieMuncie, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Putnam CountyCookeville, TN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Terre HauteTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Colonial Rehab & WellnessBardstown, KY 1 of 5Signature Healthcare at Heritage Hall Rehab & WellLawrenceburg, KY 2 of 5Fountain Circle Care & Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, KY 2 of 5Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCalvert City, KY 2 of 5Rockcastle Health & Rehabilitation CenterBrodhead, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClarksvilleClarksville, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Fentress CountyJamestown, TN 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at North Hardin Rehab & WellnRadcliff, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare at Summerfield Rehab & WellneLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of East LouisvilleLouisville, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of ElizabethtownElizabethtown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of GeorgetownGeorgetown, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of McCreary County Rehab andPine Knot, KY 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Roanoke RapidsRoanoke Rapids, NC 2 of 5Signature Healthcare of Spencer CountyTaylorsville, KY 3 of 5Harrodsburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5Lee County Care & Rehabilitation CenterBeattyville, KY 3 of 5Morgantown Care & Rehabilitation CenterMorgantown, KY 3 of 5Pickett Care And Rehabilitation CenterByrdstown, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & WellnessMonteagle, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of NorfolkNorfolk, VA 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&wellness CtrRidgely, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & WeSouth Pittsburg, TN 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at HillcrestOwensboro, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare at Jackson Manor Rehab and WeAnnville, KY 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 3 of 5Signature Healthcare of KinstonKinston, NC 3 of 5Spring City Care And Rehabilitation CenterSpring City, TN 3 of 5Westmoreland Care & Rehab CtrWestmoreland, TN 4 of 5Bluegrass Care & Rehabilitation CenterLexington, KY

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DISTINCT GROUP HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2018
JJLA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2011
LPSNF LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2011
WHEATEN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2011
STEIER III, ELMERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/12/2011
DURBIN, AMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/13/2023
HARRISON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2011
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 8%Other / private 16%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$316per resident / day
operating cost
$9,593per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185057. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next