River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 130.2 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (#2) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from physical abuse by Resident #1. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm on 10/28/2025 for Resident #2 when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 in the face with a chair. Resident #2 obtained an Acute right orbital floor and anterior orbital rim fractures with no signs of entrapment, acute fracture of the anterior and posterolateral wall of the right maxillary sinus, and a comminuted fracture of the nasal bone with recommended surgical repair. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse/Neglect Policy with a revised date of 04/03/2025, revealed the following, in part:Policy:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 (#3 and #6) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #3 was free from physical abuse by Resident #4; and 2. Resident #6 was free from physical abuse by Resident #5. This deficient practice resulted in an actual physical harm on 02/23/2025 when Resident #4, a severely cognitively impaired resident, pushed Resident #3, a severely cognitively impaired resident, onto the floor in the hallway causing Resident #3 to sustain a left eyebrow laceration. Resident #3 was sent to the local emergency room (ER) where he received 9 sutures to his left eyebrow. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse/Neglect Policy Statement dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 residents observed for incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Incontinent Care: Bladder revealed the following, in part:Policy: Perineal management is the cleansing of the perineal area that includes the genitalia and rectal areas.Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel.8. Put on disposable gloves.10. For male perineal care: e. Turn to sidelying position and wash, rinse, and dry the anal area.11. Remove and discard gloves.12. Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel. 13. Change the gown and bed linens if needed. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 2 (#7 and #9) of 4 (#5, #7, #9, and #19) sampled residents reviewed for PASRR Level II.Resident #7 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed he was diagnosed with Undifferentiated Schizophrenia on 01/09/2023. Review of Resident #7’s Form 142 dated 09/22/2014 revealed he did not meet the criteria for PASRR Level II services. On 07/16/2025 at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3SSD. She stated she was responsible for submitting Resident Review Forms to OBH. She reviewed Resident #7’s Form 142 dated 09/22/2014 and confirmed it was the most recent on file. She then reviewed Resident #7’s diagnoses, which included Undifferentiated Schizophrenia with an onset date of 01/09/2023. S3SSD confirmed a Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to:1. Ensure opened foods were sealed properly; and2. Ensured expired food items were disposed.This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 130 residents served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled Food Safety and Sanitation Policy and Procedure revealed the following, in part:Food Storage1. Food that is stored is protected from contamination and growth of any pathogenic organisms.10. Foods with expiration dates are used prior to the use by date on the package Review of the provider's policy dated 2021 and titled Food Storage Safety revealed the following, in part:Food storage from top to bottom when items are stored in the same refrigerator or freezer - Cooked foods are stored over Raw Poultry. On 07/14/2025 at 10:30 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S4DM. The following observations were made and confirmed: Freezer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 (#22 and #101) of 3 (#9, #22, and #101) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's manual with a revision date of 04/03/2025 and titled Abuse-Neglect Prevention Manual, revealed the following, in part:iii. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping. Resident #22Review of Resident #22's Clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/03/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. On 07/14/2025 at 1:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #22. Resident #22 stated he got into an altercation with Resident #101 about two weeks ago. He stated he was unable to recall the exact date. Resident #22 stated he was going to his seat in the dining room, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident involving abuse was reported to the facility administrator and State Agency in accordance with the mandated reporting guidelines for 2 (#22 and #101) of 3 (#9, #22, and #101) residents sampled for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's manual with a revision date of 04/03/2025 and titled Abuse-Neglect Prevention Manual revealed the following, in part:iii. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching.5. Investigation and Protection: in the event that any evidence involving.abuse.the issue will be reported immediately to the administrator or his designee of the facility, who will immediately notify corporate office and the appropriate state officials per state guidelines.1. Any person who has knowledge of any act or suspected act of abuse. will notify his/her supervisor immediately.Internal Reporting a. Employees must always report any abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the Administrator or his designee of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#3) resident out of a total of 28 sampled residents by failing to ensure Resident #3 was accurately coded for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review). Findings: Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Recurrent Depressive Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of Resident #3's Form 142 titled Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Medicaid Program Notice of Medical Certification dated 05/22/2024, revealed an approval for admission by the state Level II Authority for a temporary period effective 05/22/2024 through 05/21/2025. Review of Resident #3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/29/2025 revealed Section A1500: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was coded 0-No. Section A1510: Serious…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy and confidentiality was maintained for 1 (#1) of 10 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #R10) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure S5A did not take and keep an unauthorized photograph of Resident #1. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 130 residents on the current census. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident's Rights dated 12/01/1991, revealed the following, in part: A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights: (e) Privacy and Confidentiality Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Moderate with Other Behavioral Disturbances, Aphasia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Other Cerebrovascular Disease, and Recurrent Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to: 1. Ensure medications were in locked compartments permitting only authorized personnel to have access for 1 (#33) of 8 (#1, #5, #15, #33, #46, #47, #73, and #106) residents observed during the initial pool; and 2. Ensure Schedule III-IV medications were stored in a permanently affixed compartment and/or a single unit package drug distribution system for 1 (Room A) of 1 Medication Storage Room reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility revealed the following: Policy Statement: Medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing or medical personnel and pharmacy personnel. Procedure: 2. Only licensed nurses, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 (#43 and #120) of 28 residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with meals in a dignified manner as evidenced by staff standing over and sitting on Residents #43 and #120's beds while assisting them to eat. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Feeding A Resident revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 5. Sit in a chair to feed the resident. Resident #43 Review of Resident #43's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Senile Degeneration of Brain and Dementia. On 08/20/2024 at 7:35 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #43 in bed. S11CNA was observed feeding Resident #43 while standing next to his bed. S11CNA then sat on Resident #43's bed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal abuse were reported immediately but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#33) of 8 (#1, #5, #15, #33, #46, #47, #73, and #106) residents interviewed during the initial pool and reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Abuse/Neglect Policy Statement dated March 2016 revealed in part, the following: Definitions: Abuse - the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Alleged Violation - the terminology used when a verbal allegation of resident abuse has been made either by a resident, family member, visitor, or employee . Verbal Abuse - the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,388 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-11-12
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA