Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 114.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.453 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for accidents received the necessary supervision to prevent avoidable accidents including a fall. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #1 on 08/22/2024 at 12:25 p.m. when Resident #1 suffered major injuries from falling out of the bed to the floor while left unattended during a bed bath. S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing a bed bath to Resident #1. S4 CNA left the room to get more supplies for the bath and Resident #1 rolled off the bed and to the floor. Resident #1 was sent to a local hospital ER (Emergency Room) on 08/22/2024. Review of the hospital records revealed Resident #1 suffered bilateral supracondylar fractures of the right and left femurs requiring ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) of the right femur and a closed reduction and Ex-Fix application of the left distal femur on 08/22/2024. Resident #1 remained in the hospital at the time of the investigation. The facility implemented corrective actions which were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse and psychosocial harm by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1,#2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice resulted in actual harm for resident #1 (who was cognitively impaired with communication deficits) on 05/19/2024 at 6:10 p.m. when S3CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) physically and verbally abused resident #1 by forcefully grabbing resident #1's lower extremities, hands and arms in an attempt to reposition resident #1 and the resident sustained two red bruises that were identified on the left upper arm, and a reddened bruise was noted to the left hand, between thumb and index finger, red bruise was noted on top of right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. S3CNA cursed resident #1 and expressed anger at resident #1. Even though there was no significant decline in mental or physical functioning, it can be determined that the reasonable person would have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to 1) Identify Resident #14 had a MDRO infection and implement contact precautions, and 2) implement EBP for Resident #23 and #94.Findings:Resident #14 Review of the facility's undated Infection Control Precautions (Isolation) Policy revealed the following in part: Policy: Prevent the spread of infection Equipment: Provided by infection control coordinator Procedure: 5. All residents placed in isolation, for suspected or confirmed infections, shall have isolation precautions implemented in accordance with procedures established in the CDC Guidelines for Isolation Precautions in Hospitals. Review of the record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/02/2025 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications for 1 (#51) of 1 sampled residents observed for medications available at the bedside. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Medication Storage in the Facility policy revealed the following, in part: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing or medical personnel and pharmacy personnel. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 01/28/2026. Resident #51 had diagnoses that included depression, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia, and presbyopia. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had a BIMS score of 13 which indicated intact cognition for daily decision making. On 03/08/2026 at 9:00 a.m., and 12:10 p.m., observations of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 3 (#16, #29 and #51) of 3 residents reviewed for environment by 1) having unsanitary overbed tables for resident use (#16 and #29) and having an air conditioner unit in need of repair for resident #51. Findings: Resident 16 On 03/08/2026 at 11:15 a.m., 4:03 p.m. and on 03/09/2026 at 1:45 p.m. observations of Resident #16's overbed table revealed spills and splatters on top of the table. On 03/09/2026 at 2:05 p.m. observation of Resident #16's overbed table with S4Housekeeping Supervisor revealed spills and splatters on top of the table. Interview with S4Housekeeping Supervisor on 03/09/2026 at 2:10 p.m. confirmed Resident #16's overbed table was dirty and needed to be cleaned. Resident 29 On 03/08/2026 at 11:15 a.m., 4:03 p.m. and on 03/09/2026 at 1:45 p.m. observations of Resident #29's overbed table revealed spills and splatters on top of the table. On 03/09/2026 at 2:05 p.m. observation of Resident #29's overbed table with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the provider failed to ensure MDS assessments were completed and submitted timely for 3 (#3, #96, and #107) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for assessments.Findings: Resident #3Review of Resident #3's record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's MDS assessments revealed a discharge (death in facility) MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not completed and transmitted to CMS until [DATE]. An interview on [DATE] at 1:10 p.m. with S7MDS/LPN confirmed Resident #3 expired in the facility on [DATE]. S7MDS/LPN revealed she failed to complete and transmit Resident #3's discharge (death in facility) MDS assessment dated [DATE] to CMS within 7 days ([DATE]). Resident #96 Review of Resident #96's record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Review of Resident #96's MDS assessments revealed no documented evidence a discharge MDS assessment was completed or transmitted to CMS for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#99) of 2 sampled resident reviewed for ADLs. The provider failed to develop an ADLs care plan for Resident #99.Findings:Record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complication, stage 2 pressure ulcer sacral region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere specified right shoulder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism, obstructive sleep apnea, and obesity. Review of the current March 2026 Physician orders revealed an order dated 12/24/2025: requires x1 person assist with ADLs. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed no evidence to support…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure residents' fingernails were clean and trimmed in a timely manner for 1 (#99) of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings:Record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complication, stage 2 pressure ulcer sacral region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere specified right shoulder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism, obstructive sleep apnea, and obesity. Review of the current March 2026 Physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff are able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for the resident needs for 1 (#6) of 5 residents sampled for the unnecessary medication review. This was evidenced by the nurses failing to administer as needed blood pressure medication as ordered for Resident #6.Findings:Review of Resident #6's record revealed an admission date of 07/18/2020 with readmission of 11/23/2024. Resident #6 had the following diagnoses chronic systolic congestive heart failure, shortness of breath, chest pain, angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #6's March 2026 Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 02/10/2026 for Clonidine HCL oral tablet 0.1 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for hypertension, and parameters for blood pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to monitor for edema while a resident was receiving a diuretic for 1 (#92) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of 10/22/2024. Resident #92 had diagnoses that included edema, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had a BIMS score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making and required assistance with ADLs. Review of Resident #92's March 2026 physician orders revealed an order dated 03/04/2026 for Lasix (diuretic) 20 mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day related to edema. Review of the March 2026 MAR and nurses notes revealed no documented evidence the nurses monitored Resident #92 for edema. Interview on 03/10/2026 at 10:10 a.m. with S3LPN confirmed there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it assessed residents using the quarterly review instrument approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) not less frequently than once every 3 months by failing to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment at least every 3 months for 4 (#8, #15, #55, #63) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for timeliness of MDS assessments. Findings: Review of the MDS for resident #8 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 09/10/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #15 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 08/02/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #55 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 08/30/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #63 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 09/11/2024. On 01/25/2025 at 10:30 a.m., interview with #S3Clinical Care Coordinator confirmed the MDS assessments were not completed at least every 3 months for residents #8, #15, #55 and #63.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for 1 (#24) of 1 resident reviewed for constipation and 2 (#26, #60) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking. Findings: Resident #24 0n 01/13/2025 at 9:06 a.m., interview with resident #24 revealed she had recurrent problems with constipation. Review of the medical record for resident #24 revealed she had a diagnosis of constipation. Review of the care plan revealed it addressed the constipation with an intervention to assess bowel patterns. Review of the January 2025 documentation for the resident's bowel status revealed it was not recorded for 13 of 13 day shifts, for 4 of 13 evening shifts, and for 7 of 13 night shifts. On 01/15/2025 at 8:30 a.m., an interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility had not been consistently assessing the resident's bowel movements. Resident #26 Review of the medical record for resident #26 revealed he was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,869 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,851 — penalty dated 2024-09-05
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA