Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect by failing to provide the necessary care and services to 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings:The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1 on 07/24/2025 at approximately 2:30 a.m. when Resident #1 was found on the floor by S3 LPN and complained of neck pain. Resident #1 was placed back into bed and S3 LPN failed to notify the Physician of Resident #1's fall and failed to medicate Resident #1 for complaints of pain. Resident #1 sustained a second fall on 07/24/2025 at 4:30 a.m. and then complained of neck, back, and head pain at that time. Resident #1 was transported to the hospital on [DATE] at 7:40 a.m. and was diagnosed with a fracture of his C-4, C-5 and C-6. Pain medications that were ordered and available for Resident #1 were not administered.S1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents, by failing to ensure physician orders were followed timely for the management of pain, and timely hospital transfer after a fall.Findings:The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1 on 07/24/2025 at approximately 2:30 a.m. when Resident #1 complained of neck pain after being found on the floor by S3 LPN. S3 LPN failed to notify the physician of the fall and failed to administer pain medications that were ordered and available to give. Resident #1 sustained a second fall on 07/24/2025 at 4:30 a.m. and complained of neck, back, and head pain at a 10 out of 10 on the pain scale at that time. Resident #1 was not transferred to the hospital for evaluation until 3 hours after transfer orders had been given to S3 LPN. On 07/24/2025 at 1:20 p.m. the hospital notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition/weight loss. The facility failed to provide dietary interventions for a resident with significant weight loss. Findings:Review of the undated facility Nutrition/Hydration Management Policy revealed in part .It is the goal of the ID team, with participation by the RD consultant, that residents of this facility maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent medically possible. At a minimum, the following residents will be referred to the High Risk committee: Significant weight change (5% or greater in 30 days or less, 10% or greater in 180 days or less). Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/2025 with a re-entry date of 02/05/2026 with diagnoses that included in part .Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant Side,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 9 residents who received a puree diet. The facility failed to ensure staff were wearing a beard restraint during meal preparation.Findings:Observation on 02/09/2026 at 11:15 a.m., revealed S13 [NAME] with a hair net on and a full beard/goatee with no beard restraint while preparing the puree recipe for all 9 residents. S13 [NAME] stated he always prepared the puree meals for the residents in the facility.In an interview on 02/09/2026 at 12:45 p.m., S4 Dietary Manager confirmed, S13 [NAME] did not have on a beard restraint net to cover his beard during puree meal preparation and should have.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff by failing to provide an adequate number of clean washcloths and towels. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.Findings:On 02/09/2026 at 1:30 p.m., the Resident Council Meeting was conducted, and it was revealed that two of the residents expressed concerns over not having enough towels or washcloths available in the clean linen storage on the hall to properly clean and dry themselves.Interview with S7 Laundry on 02/10/2026 at 8:58 a.m. revealed that linens, towels, and washcloths are delivered to the halls between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m.Observation of linen closets on 02/10/2026 at 12:10 p.m. revealed that Hall X had six towels and no washcloths.Observation of linen closets on 02/10/2026 at 3:02 p.m. revealed that Hall V had no towels and four washcloths and Hall W had one towel and four washcloths.Interview with S8 Laundry on 02/10/2026 at 3:45 p.m. revealed that linens, towels,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.Findings:Review of the facility admission packet dated 02/2023, revealed in part- under the Mail section of Resident Rights .The resident has the right to- (1) Send and promptly receive mail that is unopened.On 02/09/2026 at 1:30 p.m., the Resident Council Meeting was conducted, and it was revealed that the residents did not receive mail on Saturdays. The Resident Council were in agreement that if resident mail was delivered on a Saturday, they would like to received their personal mail on the same day as it was delivered to the facility. During this same Resident Council meeting, the S5 SSD stated that the residents do not receive mail on Saturdays and that she received all of the weekend mail on Monday mornings to then sort and distribute to the residents on Monday.In an interview on 02/11/2026 at 9:31 a.m., S2 Assistant Admin stated that the Weekend Activity Director should distribute resident mail on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #11) residents of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure the Physician and Registered Dietician was notified of significant weight loss for Resident #11, who was at high risk for malnutrition according to their plan of care.Findings: Review of the undated facility Nutrition/Hydration Management Policy revealed in part .It is the goal of the ID team, with participation by the RD consultant, that residents of this facility maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent medically possible. At a minimum, the following residents will be referred to the High Risk committee: Significant weight change (5% or greater in 30 days or less, 10% or greater in 180 days or less). Review of Resident #11's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain bed mobility. The facility failed to provide bed mobility/repositioning as ordered for 1 (Resident #5) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings:Review of undated policy on 02/11/2026 at 2:15 p.m. titled, Positioning (Movement in Bed) revealed the following on page 6.4) Change position at least every 2 hours if resident is unable to move in bed without assistance, base frequency decisions on the resident's age, size, weight, circulatory and integumentary status and medical diagnosis. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/21/2022 and a re-entry date of 11/04/2024 with diagnoses that included in part.Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Other Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Other Specified Depressive Disorder, Alcohol Abuse, and Other Hypotension. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS with an ARD date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent incidents and accidents. The facility failed to ensure a resident received supervision while smoking for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy on 02/11/2026 at 9:59 a.m. titled Smoking Policy read in part . Residents and Visitors: Do Not Allow residents who have been classified as non-responsible to smoke alone. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed she was admitted to facility on 06/06/2011 and had diagnoses that included in part Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Lack of Coordination, Anxiety Disorder, and Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia. Record review of Resident #34's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/09/2026 revealed Resident #34 had a BIMS of 12, and was a current tobacco user. Record review of Resident #34's 02/2026 physician orders revealed in part.Resident is an unsafe smoker. Smoking plan is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents received a mechanically altered diet as ordered by the physician for 3 (#4, #49, #50) of 3 residents reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 9 residents receiving pureed diets. Findings: Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/26/2025.with diagnoses that included in part.Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis of Other Specified Veins, and Localized Edema. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 01/09/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #4 required setup or clean-up assist with eating. Review of Resident #4's physician orders dated 01/26/2026 revealed an order for Regular NSOT (no salt on tray) diet, pureed texture, and Regular/thin consistency liquids. Review of Resident's #4's care plan revealed in part. Intervention:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure personnel stored and processed linens so as to prevent the spread of infection by not drying and storing laundered lift slings, privacy curtains, mattress protectors, and Geri-chair cushions in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 89 residents living in the facility. On 02/10/2026 at 3:45 p.m. and on 02/11/2026 at 7:45 a.m., an observation was conducted of an area outside the laundry room door which revealed lift slings and a privacy curtain draped on a metal rack. These items were piled on top of each other and open to outside air and elements.In an interview on 02/11/2026 at 7:45 a.m. with S9 Laundry revealed this was how lift slings and privacy curtains were dried and stored because the laundry had nowhere else to dry or store large items.On 02/11/2026 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was conducted of the area outside the laundry room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the nurse staffing pattern was posted daily. The facility census was 89.Findings: Observation on 08/25/2025 at 11:00 a.m. of the posted facility staffing pattern revealed a date of 08/13/2025. Observation and interview on 08/25/2025 at 2:35 p.m. with S2 DON and S10 RN/Charge Nurse stated the [NAME] Clerk had quit abruptly and she was responsible for the daily posting of the facility's staffing pattern. S2 DON confirmed the posted facility staffing sheet was dated 08/13/2025 and did not reflect the current date or staffing, and it should.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,387 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,387 — penalty dated 2025-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA