Plantation Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 58.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Immediate Jeopardy situation began on 06/08/2024, around approximately 3:40 p.m., when S4CNA physically abused resident #1. S4CNA and S5CNA were providing care to resident #1 when resident #1 hollered and pointed his finger at S4CNA. S4CNA bent resident #1's finger on left hand back, bent his left foot back, and slapped resident in the chest. S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered resident #1's room and observed resident #1 and S4CNA arguing. She then witnessed when the resident pointed his finger at S4CNA and S4CNA grabbed both of the resident's hands and held them down on the bed. After the abuse incident occurred on 06/08/2024, S4CNA continued to work her shift on 06/08/2024 and also worked double shifts on 06/09/2024 and 06/10/2024. The facility did not initiate quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff reported physical abuse of a resident to administration immediately and failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act within 24 hours to one or more law enforcement entities for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Immediate Jeopardy situation began on 06/08/2024, around approximately 3:40 p.m., as a result of resident #1 being physically abused on 06/08/2024 by S4Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and witnessed by S5CNA and S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). The physical abuse of resident #1 was not reported immediately to S1Administration or S2Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/08/2024 by S4CNA, S5CNA or S6LPN. S1Administrator and S2DON were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/02/2024 at 5:53 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 07/03/2024 at 1:19 p.m., as confirmed by onsite verification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from chemical restraints imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The facility did not ensure that residents who are prescribed psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 (#7) of 5 (#2, #5, #7, #12, #23) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, repeated falls, other schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe without psychotic features.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management for 1 (#24) of 1 (#24) sampled resident reviewed for pain management. Findings: Review of the Resident #24's record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, aftercare following joint replacement surgery of right knee, and pain in unspecified knee. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required assistance for most activities of daily living. Review of Resident #24's Pain Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility had assessed the resident to be at a high risk for pain. Review of the resident's current care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies to care for resident needs. The facility staff failed to respond to call light assistance requests in a timely manner for 1 (#41) of 1 residents reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. Findings:On 09/22/2025 at 10:00 a.m., a meeting with regular attendees of the facility's resident council revealed complaints from Resident #51 and Resident #24 of excessive wait times for call light response from facility staff. Other attendees in the meeting concurred with Resident #51 and Resident #24's complaint. Resident #41Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, unspecified; weakness; other reduced mobility; and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The facility failed to 1) maintain oxygen concentrator filters as ordered for 1 (#7) of 1 (#7) residents reviewed for respiratory care, and 2) utilize disinfectant solution per manufacturer's instructions for use in the facility shower room where 40 of 52 residents are showered. Findings:Resident #7Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, repeated falls, other schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe without psychotic features.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident. The facility failed to ensure that interventions were implemented for an unsafe smoker as indicated in the plan of care for 1 (#45) of 3 (#7, #16, #45) residents reviewed for accidents.Findings:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, acquired absence of left leg below knee, history of falling, and dysphagia.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 which indicated that Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment for daily decision making. The MDS documented that Resident #45 had impairment to upper and lower extremities bilaterally with range of motion.Review of the active electronic Plan of Care as of 09/23/2025 revealed Resident #45 had a potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent state inspection results since the last annual survey were available for resident review. Findings: An observation on 09/09/2024 at 7:35 a.m. revealed the results of the last annual survey results 10/04/2023 posted by the front entrance, but the last complaint survey dated 07/08/2024 was not posted. An interview with S1Administrator on 09/10/2024 at 12:45 p.m. confirmed the most recent state inspection results from 07/08/2024 were not posted for resident review.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 (#7, #22, #46 and #55) of 8 (#1, #2, #7, #12, #22, #46, #51 and #55) resident rooms/bathrooms observed. The failed practice was evidenced by the resident rooms/bathrooms listed above being in need of cleaning along with the laundry room being in need of cleaning with cleaning supplies being stored directly on the floor of the laundry room. Findings: Resident #7 On 09/09/2024 at 2:12 p.m., and 09/10/2024 at 1:35 p.m., observations of resident #7's room revealed a wash cloth was in between the air vents and the air conditioner vents contained dirt and grime. Resident #22 On 09/09/2024 at 10:16 a.m., an observation of resident #22's room revealed the air conditioner vents contained grime and debris and had a paper towel in between the vents. On 09/10/2024 at 1:40 p.m., observation of resident #22's room revealed the air conditioner vents contained a black substance. Resident #55 On 09/09/2024 at 3:27 p.m., an observation of resident #55's room revealed the air…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident`s plan of care was implemented for 1 (#11) of 1 (#11) resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The failed practice was evidenced by resident #11 not having his urinary catheter bag covered in a privacy bag when outside of his room. Findings: Record review revealed resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia, epilepsy, traumatic brain dysfunction, fractures and other multiple trauma, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, cerebral infarction, and depression. The record review revealed resident #11 had a suprapubic urinary catheter upon admission. Further review of the record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. The cognitive pattern section of the MDS data recorded a Brief Interview of Mental Status score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated resident #11 had no cognitive impairment. Review of active orders for September 2024 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for 1 (#53) of 3 (#33, #44, and #53) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of resident #53's record revealed an admission date of 11/23/2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, abrasion to the right knee, urinary tract infection, dysphagia, history of falling, aphasia, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee, cognitive communication deficit, pneumonia, and anorexia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed resident requires assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. An observation of resident #53 on 09/09/2024 at 9:15 a.m. revealed the resident was sitting up in a high back wheelchair with both of her feet dangling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who require colostomy services received care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan. The failed practice was evidenced by 1 (#11) of 1 (#11) resident reviewed for colostomy care by not having colostomy bags available in accordance with his plan of care. Findings: Record review revealed resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia, epilepsy, traumatic brain dysfunction, fractures and other multiple trauma, cog communication deficit, lack of coordination, cerebral infarction, and depression. The record review revealed resident #11 had a colostomy to his left side upon admission. Further review of the record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. The cognitive pattern section of the MDS data recorded a brief interview of mental status score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated resident #11 had no cognitive impairment. Review of active orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$128,001 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $128,001 — penalty dated 2024-07-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA