Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 108.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  I. Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the likelihood of foodborne illnesses to the 110 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 08/18/2024 at 9:15 a.m. when the following was observed during multiple visits in the facility's kitchen: 1. Equipment: a. Excessive food residue on the stove top. b. Black residue under the ice machine's filter. Water dripped down over the black residue. c. Collection receptacle of the oven's grill top with old food, thick black burnt residue, and uncooked pasta. d. Dry food particles and grease on the oven handle. e. Burnt food particles on the stove burners. f. Food splatter on the shelf of the stove. g. Grease on the backsplash of the fryer. h. Dried grease on the back surface of the stove and grill. i. Ice buildup on the floor located on the back wall in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Dish and cookware storage and cleanliness: a. Four rack shelf…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-08-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of residents by failing to provide oversight in the kitchen. This lack of oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 08/18/2024 at 9:15 a.m., when the kitchen was observed to have equipment, environment, food storage, preparation practices; and dinnerware storage practices that were unsanitary and unsafe for meal distribution to residents with the high likelihood to cause foodborne illness. S1ADM (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 08/18/2024 at 5:51 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/20/2024 at 10:40 a.m., after it was verified through observations, interviews, and record reviews that the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal prior to the survey exit. This deficient practice had the potential to cause foodborne illness in 110 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. Findings: Cross Reference F812 On 08/19/24 3:36 p.m., an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: opened food item not labeled with the date; expired foods in the kitchen walk in cooler, and dry storage area;grease splatter and thick layer of debris on the deep fryer cover and cooking oil collection area; andexposed facial hairThis deficient practice had the potential to affect the 103 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.Findings:On 08/18/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Refrigerated Food, with a last revision date of October 2018, revealed in part. Policy: The facility ensures the quality and safety of refrigerated food through accepted storage practices. Procedure:.4. All non-hazardous, opened foods are labeled with name of food and date stored.On 08/18/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary Dress Code, with no known revision date, revealed in part.Proper Work Attire.b. The food service employee observes the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a discharge in writing for 1 (#110) of 1 (#110) resident reviewed for discharge requirements out of a final sample of 36.Findings:Review of Resident #110's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 06/11/2025, with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Further review of Resident #110's EMR revealed a progress note indicating the resident was discharged on 06/13/2025.Continued review of Resident #110's EMR failed to reveal evidence that the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified in writing of Resident #110's discharge from the facility on 06/13/2025.On 08/20/2025 at 10:01 A.M., an interview was conducted with S8ADM (Administrator). S8ADM stated the Ombudsman had not been notified of the resident's discharge as this was something the facility did not do.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) within 14 days after determining there was a significant change in 2 (#2, #4) of 36 sampled resident's reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 105.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Policy with no review date, revealed the following; Significant Change Assessments: Significant Change Assessments will be completed as soon as needed to provide appropriate care to the resident, but in no case, later than 14 days after determining a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition has occurred.Resident #2Review of Resident #2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date 04/07/2023 with diagnosis that included combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, hypokalemia, and depression. A comparison review of MDS Assessments with an ARD (Assessment Reference Dates) of 03/25/2025 and 06/11/2025 revealed Resident #2 had a decline in his functional status in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to accurately code a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) for use of an antipsychotic medication for 1(#25) out of 36 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #25's electronic health record revealed an admit date of 06/18/2015 with diagnoses including delusional disorder and major depressive disorder. Resident #25's current physician orders revealed an order for Aripiprazole (an atypical antipsychotic medication) 2 mg (milligrams) daily.Review of Resident #25's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) for May 2025 through June 2025 revealed she received Aripiprazole daily.Review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/03/2025, revealed in part: Section N. Medications. N0415. High Risk Drug Classes: Use. A. Antipsychotic.Is resident taking.marked No.On 08/20/2025 at 1:15 p.m. an interview and electronic record review was conducted with S6CCC (Clinical Care Coordinator). She verified Resident #25 received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility's kitchen was free from insects. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 110 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 8/18/2024 at 4:05 p.m., an interview and observation of the dishwashing room was conducted with S16DM (Dietary Manager), S1ADM (Administrator), and S19MA (Maintenance Assistant). A large swarm of gnats were observed flying around the dishwashing room. S16DM stated that a bug light was out of order in the kitchen. On 8/18/2024 at 4:45 p.m. a tour of the kitchen by the survey team was conducted with S15PM (Production Manager) and S16DM during which the following was observed: 1. One live cockroach crawling behind the stove; 2. One live cockroach crawling in the dry food storage room; and 3. Three dead roaches in a small red bucket stored under the food prep counter. On 8/19/2024 at 3:36 p.m., an interview with S22RD (Registered Dietician) was conducted.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the resident's plan of care to provide the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 (#1, #4, and #5) residents in a final sample of 44 residents by: 1. failing to follow physician's orders for tube feeding for Resident #1; 2. failing to follow physician's orders for applying prevalon heel protector to Resident #4's right foot; 3. failing to ensure that interventions were care planned after Resident #5 sustained a fall. Findings: Resident # 1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/17/2020 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Hyperosmolality and Hypernatremia, and Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of the physician's orders dated 07/05/2024 revealed an order for Jevity 1.5 cal (calories) at 44ml/hour (milliliter/hour) with water flushes at 45ml/hr per continuous pump. On 08/18/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an observation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan as evidenced by: 1. failing to ensure assessment of the resident's condition before dialysis treatments, and 2. failing maintain an effective communication system between the facility and the dialysis center for 1(#68) of 1(#68) investigated for dialysis care out of 44 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #68's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Encounter for Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery On The Circulatory System, Dependence of Renal Dialysis, and Deficiency of Other Vitamins. A review of Resident #68's physician orders revealed she received dialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at an offsite dialysis center. A review of Resident #68's Dialysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#4) of 3 (#1, #4, and #32) residents reviewed for tube feeding by failing to ensure the tube feeding container was appropriately labeled. Findings: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/17/2020 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Dysphagia, and Multiple Sclerosis. Review of Resident #4's dietitian orders revealed in part, Jevity at 55ml/hr (milliliter/hour) with 40ml/hr H2O (water). Observation on 08/18/2024 at 10:15 a.m. revealed Resident #4's was receiving Jevity via feeding pump. Further observation revealed Resident #4's tube feeding formula label failed to include the date and time the feeding was hung. A second observation on 08/18/2024 at 10:39 a.m. revealed Resident #4's was receiving Jevity via feeding pump. Further observation revealed Resident #4's tube feeding formula label failed to include the date and time the feeding was hung. During an interview and observation on 08/18/2024 at 1:07 p.m. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly stored when not in use for 2 (#27, #31) of 2 (#27, #31) residents investigated for respiratory care in a final sample of 44 residents. Findings: On 08/19/24 at 12:00 p.m., a review of the facility's policy titled Nebulizer Treatments, with no dates listed on policy, read in part: Procedure . 11 . Place nebulizer, mouthpiece and t-piece in closed plastic bag when not in use. Resident #31 Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Shortness of breath, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of August 2024 Physician Orders revealed orders for: Yupelri Inhalation Solution 175 mcg (micrograms)/3ml (milliliters) - 1 vial inhaled once daily; Budesonide Inhalation Suspension 0.5 mg/2ml- 1 vial inhaled two times a day; and Formoterol Fumarate inhalation nebulization solution 20 mcg/2ml- 1 vial inhaled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff followed facility policies and procedures for medication administration. This deficient practice is evidenced by a nurse leaving medications at the resident's bedside for 1 (#26) of 44 sampled residents. Findings: On 08/20/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy General Guidelines with a last reviewed date of 02/19/2024 read in part: Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices .Procedure: Medications are administered at the time they are prepared . The person administering medication must remain with the resident until all medication has been swallowed. On 08/20/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medication with a last reviewed date of 02/19/2024 read in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to self-administer medications, but is the responsibility of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,369 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,369 — penalty dated 2024-08-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA