No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Plantation Manor Nursing And Rehab Center, LLC

6340 Highway 4, Winnsboro, LA 71295 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 135 certified beds · (318) 435-2225 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 435-2225 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2104 Loop Rd · (318) 435-4084 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
K&S Drugs0.7 mi
802 Adams St · (318) 435-7858 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1304 Cornell St · (318) 435-1455 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%17.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.7%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.3%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%22.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.4%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%28.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.2%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.622.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.492.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.9%CMS range 32.8–49.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.7–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.5%CMS range 6.3–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
24.1%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 129.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-10)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses assessed resident's needs for 1 (#14) of 1 (#14) resident sampled for urinary catheter or urinary tract infections (UTI). The failed practice was evidenced by Resident #14 being diagnosed with a UTI on 12/23/2025 with no record of assessments or interventions in the medical record by licensed nursing staff on 12/24/2024 or 12/25/2025 directly related to her diagnoses of a UTI. Findings:Resident #14Record review revealed Resident #14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a readmission from a hospital on [DATE]. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated she had no cognitive impairment. Review of diagnoses revealed Resident #14 had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, history of UTI, and chronic kidney disease.Further review of the medical record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed quarterly for 1 (#37) of 4 (#30, #37, #43, and #124) residents sampled for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure 1) Resident #37 was assessed quarterly for self-administration of medications, 2) a specific order was obtained for self-administration of medications for Resident #37, and 3) the care plan for Resident #37's included self-administration of medications with the specified medications to be self-administered.Findings:Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medication, undated, Policy and Procedure revealed the following, in part:It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to self-administer medications, but is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to determine that it is safe prior to the resident exercising that right.2. If the resident wishes to self-administer medications, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) must assess the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new diagnosis of schizophrenia was referred to the appropriate state agency for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (#12) of 2 (#12, #13) residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings:Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominate side, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, muscle wasting and atrophy both thighs, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and other lack of coordination. Further review revealed Resident #12 was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, on 04/01/2025.Review of Form142 (Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Medicaid Program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored properly by having medications at resident's bedside for 1 (#71) of 1 resident reviewed for medication storage. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy (undated) revealed the following in part: Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing or medical personnel and pharmacy personnel. 2. Only licensed nurses, the consultant pharmacist, and those lawfully authorized to administer mediations are allowed access to medications. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 01/09/2025. Resident #71 had diagnoses that included altered mental status, hypertensive heart disease, depression, reflux, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, rhabdomyolysis, dementia, muscle wasting, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. The facility failed to date multi dose insulin pens when first used for 6 (#33, #39, #50, #100, #104, #225) of 6 (#33, #39, #50, #100, #104, #225) insulin pens observed without a date and by not discarding 1 (#225) of 1 (#225) insulin pens within 28 days after the first use. Findings: On 07/10/2024 at 3:07 p.m. observation of Hall A medication cart revealed the following insulin pens were not dated upon first use: Resident #33: Novolog and Basaglar (Lantus) pens were not dated when first used. Resident #39: Novolog and Basaglar (Lantus) pens were not dated when first used. On 07/10/2024 at 3:15 p.m., an interview with S3Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the insulin pens should have been dated when first used and were not for resident #33 and resident #39. On 07/10/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure random and personal items were not stored in the laundry department. Findings: On 07/08/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an observation of the laundry department revealed the following items were observed on a shelf that was designated for clean mops: 1-large pair of scissors, 1-insulated pink colored drinking glass, 4-sharpies, 1-pair of ear pods, and 1-pair of eye glasses. Further observation revealed the following: 1-large hand held tape dispenser and a purse were stored on a shelf with clean clothing. 1-long cord and cell phone charger was stored on a table that was designated for folding resident clean clothing and linens. The cell phone charger and cord was laying on top of and in direct contact with the table top. 1-gray tote bag was on the floor between a large and small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 1 (#56) of 1 (#56) resident reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings: Record review revealed resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, edema, and glaucoma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for resident #56 revealed a brief interview of mental status could not be completed due to memory problems, and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Further review of the MDS data revealed resident #56 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living care which included personal hygiene. On 07/08/2024 at 1:55 p.m., observation revealed resident #56 had long fingernails with jagged edges to both hands. The right hand was noted to be contracted. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#73) of 2 (#71 & #73) residents reviewed for positioning. The facility failed to address the positioning needs for resident #73. Findings: Review of the record for resident #73 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Down syndrome, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, muscle wasting and atrophy, congestive heart failure, incontinence without sensory awareness, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had modified independent cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident's mobility device was a wheelchair. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with toilet hygiene and dressing and the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and shower/bathe. The resident was always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care to attain or maintain a resident`s highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#109) of 1 (#109) residents reviewed for the use of a wander guard as a restraint along with the use of compression stockings. Findings: On 07/18/2023 at 12:55 pm, observation revealed Resident #109 was sitting near the front door next to staff. One to two plus edema was noted to both feet. Compression socks were not on Resident #109`s lower extremities. Resident #109 had a wander guard bracelet on her left ankle. On 07/19/2023 at 08:27 am, an observation conducted in Resident #109`s room revealed she was sitting in a chair at a bedside table eating breakfast. Two plus edema was observed to both feet. Resident #109 had a wander guard bracelet on her left ankle. Record review revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#98 & #120) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility failed to identify skin tears for residents #98 and #120. Findings: Resident #98 Observation on 07/17/2023 at 9:15 a.m. revealed resident #98 was up in her wheelchair in her room. Resident #98 had skin tear and bruise to right forearm approximately an inch long. There was a band-aid above the skin tear. Review of the medical record for resident #98 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of insomnia, fracture 5th metacarpal bone left hand, chronic pain, mild protein - calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, anxiety and history of falling. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident #98 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident fed by enternal means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications including but not limited to dehydration and metabolic abnormalities for 2 (#40, #73) of 2 (#40, #73) residents investigated for tube feeding. Findings: Resident #73 On 07/17/2023 at 02:36 p.m., an observation of Resident #73 revealed her tube feeding bag did not have a legible date on the bag or the specific type of tube feeding written on the bag. On 07/17/2023 at 03:01 p.m., an observation was conducted in Resident #73's room with S3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). S3LPN confirmed Resident #73`s tube feeding bag was not labeled correctly. Record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia following stroke, gastrostomy, dysphagia following stroke, and muscle wasting. Most recent minimum data set assessment completed on 05/24/2023 revealed Resident #73 had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLCBaton Rouge, LA 1 of 5Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPineville, LA 1 of 5Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, LLCBaton Rouge, LA 1 of 5Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, LLCLake Charles, LA 2 of 5Belle Teche Nursing & Rehab CenterNew Iberia, LA 2 of 5Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West MonWest Monroe, LA 2 of 5Plantation Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWisner, LA 2 of 5Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterShreveport, LA 3 of 5Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehab Center, LLCWinnfield, LA 3 of 5Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAlexandria, LA 3 of 5Belle Maison Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLCHammond, LA 3 of 5Forest Haven Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLCJonesboro, LA 3 of 5Garden Park Nursing & Rehab CTR, LLCShreveport, LA 3 of 5Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLCShreveport, LA 3 of 5River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLCBaker, LA 3 of 5Southern Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterShreveport, LA 3 of 5Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterZachary, LA 4 of 5Ascension Oaks Nursing & Rehab CenterGonzales, LA 4 of 5Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterBossier City, LA 4 of 5Harmony House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, IShreveport, LA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KISATCHIE HEALTH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF51%since 02/01/2001
PRICO, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF29%since 02/01/2001
ZIMMERMAN, FREDAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 03/31/2025
PRICE, TEDDYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
BOLWAHNN, SHEILAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2008
CANTRELL, JEFFREY LEEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2013
COLVIN, THOMASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
COMBETTA, JEFFREYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
FERRINGTON, KEITH B.IndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
ROGERS, DAWNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/1993
SHELTON, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/23/1990

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.7M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 12%Other / private 20%

This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$275per resident / day
operating cost
$8,358per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$302per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195257. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next