Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 70.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a person centered care plan by failing to ensure nursing staff followed the physician's order to notify the MD of an elevated blood glucose level for 1 (#2) of 3 residents reviewed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Other Hypoglycemia, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Long-Term Use of Insulin. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/03/2026 revealed a BIMS assessment was not conducted related to the resident was rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #2's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part:Problem: MD orders - need to follow; andInterventions: Humalog KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/mL (Insulin Lispro).Problem: The resident has Diabetes Mellitus; andInterventions: Diabetes medication as ordered by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' Medication Administration Record (MAR) were accurately documented for 2 (#3 and #4) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accurate documentation. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Insulin Guidelines revealed the following, in part: Policy: Insulin is utilized to control blood sugar levels in residents with diabetes mellitus. Insulin therapy may include various regimens, which are carried out per doctor's orders. Insulin lowers the blood glucose by decreasing the release of glucose from the liver and increasing the utilization of glucose by muscle and fat cells.Guidelines: Whenever a physician orders Regular insulin on a sliding scale, care must be taken to document finger stick blood sugar and administration of insulin as ordered. Charting on MAR and/or nurses' notes should include the following:a. Date, time, and results of finger stick blood sugar testingb. Dose of insulin administration in accordance with sliding scale…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (#37 and #71) out of 28 residents in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 and #71 were coded accurately on the Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Resident #37 Review of Resident #37's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Dementia Psychotic Disturbance, Catatonic Disorder Depressive Disorders, and Mental Disorder. Review of Resident #37's Entry MDS with an ARD of 04/17/2025 revealed the following, in part: Section A1500 Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR), Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and or intellectual disability or a related condition was coded as no. Review of Resident #37's Behavioral Health State Form 142 with a date of 03/18/2025 revealed Resident #37 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#76) of 29 residents reviewed during the initial pool.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Light Systems, undated, revealed the following, in part:Policy: To respond to resident's request and needs. Essential Points: Unless indicated in the care plan, each resident, when in their room or in bed, must have the call light placed within reach at all times. when out of bed, call bell is to be pulled so it is accessible from wheelchair or bedside chair. Review of Resident #76's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unsteadiness On Feet, Parkinson's Disease, and Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #76's Entry MDS, with an ARD of 01/28/2026, indicated the resident was assessed by the facility and required substantial assistance for transfers. Review of Resident #76's current Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect each residents' right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 (#33) of 29 residents reviewed for abuse in the initial pool. The facility failed to protect Resident #33 from verbal abuse by Resident #11.Findings: Review of facility's policy titled Abuse-Neglect Prevention Manual with a revision date of 04/03/2025 revealed the following:II. Policy: It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse.Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from verbal abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents.Definitions:Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds to residents within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Resident #33 Review of Resident #33's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of physical and verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency immediately, but no later than 2 hours, for 1 (#33) of 29 residents reviewed for abuse in the initial pool. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled Abuse-Neglect Prevention Manual with a revision date of 04/03/2025 revealed the following:6. Reporting and Response: it is the policy of the facility that abuse allegations are reported per Federal and State Law. Reports are to be no later than 2 hours to health standards if the incident or allegation involves abuse with or without serious bodily harm.Definitions:Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds to residents within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Physical Abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, biting, and kicking. B. Alleged Violation: is the terminology used when a verbal allegation of resident abuse. has been made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#24) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to trim and clean Resident #24's fingernails.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy, Nail Management, revealed the following, in part:Policy: Nail management is the regular care of the toenails and fingernails to promote cleanliness, and skin integrity of tissues, to prevent infection, and injury from scratching by fingernails.It includes cleansing, trimming, smoothing, and cuticle care and is usually done during the bath. Non diabetic residents may have nail care performed by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). Review of Resident #24's Medical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Muscle Wasting and Atrophy of Right and Left Shoulder and Need for Assistance with Personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#68) of 5 residents reviewed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing direct care for Resident #68 who was on EBP.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure, dated 08/12/2024, revealed the following, in part: Definitions: Precautions involve gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for residents.at increased risk of multi drug resistant organism acquisition (for example residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices.)High-contact resident activities include:Device care or use: feeding tubeCare and use of indwelling medical devices would mean any dressing changes, injecting or infusing medication or tube feedings with indwelling medical device. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have sufficient Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff to provide direct care and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident based on the facility assessment. This deficiency had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 68 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Minimum Staffing Requirements assessment revealed the following: Hall A Days: 1-2 CNA Evenings: 1 CNA Nights: 1 CNA Hall B Days: 2 CNA Evenings: 2 CNA Nights: 1 CNA Hall C Days: 2 CNA Evenings: 2 CNA Nights: 1 CNA Review of the facility's Staffing Pattern dated 03/04/2025 revealed the following: Staff assigned: Day shift - 7 CNA; Evening shift- 2-CNA; Night shift- 2 CNA On 04/06/2025 at 9:16 a.m. an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She revealed the facility was often short staffed. She further stated it was most often Hall B and Hall C that was short staffed. On 04/06/2025 at 9:35 a.m. an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She revealed the facility was often short…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#R1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #R1 ) residents reviewed. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Call Light System, revealed, in part: Unless indicated in the care plan, each resident, when in their room or in bed, must have the call light placed within reach at all times, regardless of staff assessment of resident ability to use it. A review of the medical record for Resident #R1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy right shoulder, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Unsteadiness on feet, History of falling, Dementia, Lack of Coordination, and Alzheimer's Disease. A review of the current Care Plan for Resident #R1 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to Gait/balance problems. Interventions included encourage resident to call for assist. On 04/06/2025 at 8:51 a.m., an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA