Ascension Oaks Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 98.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assistive device was available for use to decrease the risk of falls for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm on 02/21/2024 at 6:26 p.m. when S2Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) removed Resident #1's wheelchair from her room and placed it in the hallway. Resident #1 was unable to access her wheelchair to assist with mobility. On 02/21/2024 at 7:48 p.m. Resident #1 was found sitting on a fall matt next to her bed. On 02/22/2024 Resident #1 complained of pain in the left upper leg and was diagnosed with a left femur fracture which required hospitalization and surgical repair. Resident #1 had a decline in functional mobility and continence due to the fall and resulting fracture. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Fall Prevention Program policy on 03/05/2024 at 1:05 p.m. revealed, in part, the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff knocked before entering a resident's room for 2 (S4Housekeeper, S5Housekeeper) of 2 staff identified not respecting residents' dignity. Findings:Review of the facility's admission Packet, dated 02/2023, revealed, in part, the facility must promote care for residents in a manner that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect. Resident #24Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/03/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, which indicated Resident #24 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #24's hearing was adequate. Observation on 06/08/2026 at 10:30AM revealed Resident #24's room door was partially open with the room lights off, and Resident #24 was lying in bed. Further observation revealed S4Housekeeper entered Resident #24's room without knocking and turned the light switch on without saying anything to Resident #24. Further observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was maintained in a clean and homelike manner for 1 (Resident #81) of 4 sampled residents investigated for environment. Findings:Review of the facility's admission Packet, dated 02/2023, revealed, in part, the facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Further review revealed the facility must provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic cough, shortness of breath, seasonal allergies, and communication deficit. Review of Resident #81's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/05/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #81 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 15, which indicated Resident #81 was cognitively intact. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) were maintained and accurately documented for 2 (Resident #38, Resident #60) of 22 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #8, Resident #13, Resident #19, Resident #21, Resident #22, Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #37, Resident #38,Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #53, Resident #60, Resident #71, Resident #77, Resident #79, Resident #81, Resident #83, Resident #85, and Resident #302) sample residents reviewed for accurate records. Findings: Review of the facility's undated General Medical Records policy/procedure revealed, in part, staff were to record all care given, including medication and treatments. Further review revealed staff were to record any adverse reactions, anything abnormal, or anything out of the ordinary. Review of Resident #38's June 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, the following orders: -Mirtazapine (a medication used to treat insomnia) 15 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) at bedtime for insomnia; -Sennosides-Docusate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record reviews, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence that ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after identifying that coffee temperatures needed to be monitored. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Guidelines policy revealed, in part, the policy was to establish procedures within the facility for QAPI by incorporating monitoring. Further review revealed the facility should put in place systems to monitor care and services. Further review revealed the facility would use performance indicators to monitor care process and outcomes, and review findings. Review of the facility's In-Service Training Report dated 05/28/2025 revealed, in part, staff were to allow coffee to cool to a temperature of 120 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit before serving to residents. Review of the facility's QAPI plan related to coffee temperatures dated May 2025 revealed, in part, coffee temperatures were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a serious mental illness was referred to the Louisiana Office of Behavioral Health for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (Resident #85) of 2 (Resident #2, Resident #85) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Review of Resident #85'a clinical record, reveled, in part, Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes mood swings). Review of Resident #85's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/15/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #85 had an active diagnosis of bipolar disorder. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, a referral was made to the Louisiana Office of Behavioral Health's PASARR program regarding Resident #85's diagnosis of bipolar disorder since admission on [DATE] as required. In an interview on 06/11/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve residents' food at an acceptable temperature as required. Findings: In an interview on 06/09/25 at 10:20 AM, Resident #71 (who resided on Hall a) indicated the facility's food is terrible and cold. Observation on 06/11/2025 at 11:51AM revealed a facility staff member transported the lunch trays down Hall a on a tray cart. Further observation revealed the door to the tray cart was left opened and Resident #72's lunch tray could be visualized. On 06/11/2025 at 11:51AM the surveyor collected Resident #72's lunch tray to be used as a test tray. Upon sampling the food on Resident #72's tray, surveyors found the black eyed peas, fried pork fritter, and cooked turnip greens to be lukewarm (not at a temperature consistent with a palatable food temperatures). Observation on 06/11/2025 at 11:55AM, revealed S14DM checked the temperatures of the food on Resident #72's above mentioned lunch tray. Further observation revealed the black eyed peas were 103 degrees Fahrenheit, the cooked turnip greens were 107 degrees Fahrenheit, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food stored in the facility's freezer was properly contained and labeled with an opened date; and, 2. Ensure staff followed the manufacturer's instructions for the 3 compartment sink to correctly sanitize dishware. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Storage of Frozen Food policy and procedure revised on 12/2012 revealed, in part, the facility ensured the quality and safety of frozen food through accepted storage practices. Further review revealed the facility staff were to ensure no food was left uncovered and opened boxes of frozen foods should be closed and sealed tightly, and dated when opened. Observation of the facility's freezer with S14Dietary Manager on 06/09/2025 at 9:31AM, revealed an opened box of okra. Further observation revealed the bag of okra was not closed and was unlabeled with an opened date. In an interview on 06/09/2025 at 9:31AM, S14Dietary Manager indicated the bag of frozen okra was not sealed and was not labeled with an opened date, and should have been. 2. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes when performing wound care for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2, Resident #40) residents observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Universal Precautions policy and procedure, revealed, in part, handwashing was to be performed before and after each contact with a resident whether gloves are worn or not, and handwashing was to be performed following exposure of hands to body fluids, blood, excretions, or other contaminates (see Handwashing Technique policy and procedure). Review of the facility's undated Handwashing Technique policy and procedure revealed, in part, hands must be washed during performance of duties such as handling dressings. Observation on 06/11/2025 at 9:14AM revealed S12Wound Care Nurse sanitized her hands and applied a gown and gloves before she performed Resident #2's right foot dressing change. Further observation revealed S12Wound Care Nurse removed Resident #2's right foot dressing and placed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident in a semiprivate room had a ceiling suspended curtain around the bed for 1 (Resident #79) of 14 (Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #13, Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #37, Resident #38, Resident #60, Resident #71, Resident #77, Resident #79, Resident #81, Resident #83, Resident #302) sampled residents observed for privacy. Findings: Observation on 06/09/2025 at 10:28AM revealed Resident #79 did not have a ceiling suspended privacy curtain suspended around Resident #79's bed as required, to ensure privacy. Observation on 06/10/2025 at 10:40AM revealed Resident #79 did not have a ceiling suspended privacy curtain suspended around Resident #79's bed as required, to ensure privacy. In an interview on 06/10/2025 at 11:08AM, S11Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated Resident #79 was in a semi-private room and currently had a roommate. S11CNA further indicated Resident #79's ceiling suspended privacy curtain was missing and should not have been. In an interview on 06/11/2025 at 2:22PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff locked the kitchen doors to prevent a confused and wandering resident (Resident #33) from entering/exiting the kitchen (Door j and Door k) 2. Ensure free standing oxygen cylinders were secured (Lounge d) in a manner that prevented the potential for serious harm or injury for all 96 residents; and 3. Ensure electrical rooms and/or housekeeping closets (Electrical Room a, Electrical Room b, Electrical Room c, and Closet e) were secured. This deficient practice was identified for 4 rooms. There were 9 residents identified as being confused and have the ability to wander (Resident #14, Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #28, Resident #33, Resident #45, Resident #57, Resident #71, and Resident #89) of 9 (Resident #14, Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #28, Resident #33, Resident #45, Resident #57, Resident #71, and Resident #89) as documented on the facility's Physician Orders list for Wanderguards. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$158,838 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $150,326 — penalty dated 2024-06-26
• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA