Resthaven Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to inform the resident's responsible party (RP) of a resident's change in condition for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP when Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital. Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a revision date of May 2017, revealed the following, in part:Policy StatementOur facility shall promptly notify the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Policy Interpretation and Implementation4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when:b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; e. It is necessary to transfer the resident to a hospital. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Cerebral Infarct and Cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by failing to give medications as ordered for 2 (#67 and #85) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with 3 medication errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 12.00%. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications with revision date April 2019 revealed the following, in part:Policy StatementMedications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Policy Interpretation and Implementation3. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 9. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication Resident #67On 01/13/2026 at 10:37 a.m., an observation was made of S4LPN during medication pass for Resident #67. S4LPN prepared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute foods under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure:1. The ice machine was maintained in safe operating and sanitary condition; and2. Pots and pans were sanitized.This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 81 residents who ate from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 01/11/2026 at 8:30 a.m., an observation was made of the ice machine in the kitchen with a low level of ice mixed with pink sludge. Further observation revealed pink sludge in the right front corner. On 01/11/2026 at 8:34 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DM. She stated the ice machine was serviced and cleaned on 01/09/2026. She observed and confirmed the pink sludge in the ice machine and confirmed this was not sanitary. 2. On 01/11/2026 at 8:45 a.m., an observation was made of S8CK washing pots in the 3 compartment sink. She stated pots and pan were washed and sanitized in the 3 compartment sink. She showed her method while stating she washed, sanitized, and rinsed. Further observation was made of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure refuse containers were in good condition and waste was properly contained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 01/11/2026 at 9:15 a.m., an observation was made of a large open bulk grease disposal container outside, next to the facility wall, behind the kitchen with the lid open. A further observation was made of a large amount of black grease on top of the container and on the surrounding concrete area with leaves mixed in. On 01/11/2026 at 9:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DM. She stated the bulk grease disposal container was in poor condition. She confirmed the lid was open and had grease on top and on the surrounding concreate area since September 2025. She confirmed this was unsanitary. On 01/11/2026 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He stated he was aware of the bulk grease disposal container located behind the kitchen. He stated the lid had been left open and when it rained the grease spilled over onto the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure the residents' Shower Room A was comfortable and sanitary. Findings: On 01/13/2026 at 3:00 p.m., an observation was made of Shower Room A. The observation revealed a black, fuzzy substance on the tile below the shower head where the wall tile met the floor. On 01/13/2026 at 3:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. She confirmed the above observation. She stated Shower Room A was not a comfortable and sanitary environment. She stated the black fuzzy substance had been present for a long time and was an ongoing problem. She stated S7MNT and S1ADM were both aware of Shower Room A's condition. On 01/13/2026 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7MNT. He stated he was aware Shower Room A used by residents had a black fuzzy substance on the tile below the shower head where the wall met the floor. He stated the substance had been present for months. He confirmed Shower Room A was not maintained in a comfortable and sanitary manner.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 (#2 and #51) of 22 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Call Light System, revised 06/2023, revealed the following, in part:Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. General Guideline: 4. Ensure that the call light is easily reachable by the resident. Resident #2Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip, Mild Neurocognitive Disorder with Behavioral Disturbance, Wedge Compression Fracture of T9-T10 Vertebra, Intellectual Disabilities, Schizophrenia, and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 12/03/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 11, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #2's current Care Plan revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately coded the correct discharge location for 1 (#92) of 3 residents reviewed for closed records.Review of Resident #92's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/10/2025 revealed Resident #92 was discharged to a Short-Term General Hospital. Review of Resident #92's Nurse's Notes revealed the following, in part:12/10/2025 at 11:20 a.m. Resident #92 left facility via wheelchair accompanied by his own transportation. On 01/14/2026 at 5:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9MDS. S9MDS confirmed Resident #92 left the facility against medical advice. She reviewed Resident #92's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 12/10/2025 and confirmed it indicated he discharged to a Short-Term General Hospital. S9MDS confirmed Resident #92's discharge status was not coded accurately and should have been coded as discharged to home/community. On 01/14/2026 at 5:20 p.m., an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation with accurate mental health diagnoses for 1 (#67) of 2 sampled residents' records reviewed for PASRR.Review of Resident #67's Clinical Record revealed Resident #67 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #67's PASRR Level 1 Form dated 07/30/2025 revealed mental health diagnoses which included Major Depression and Anxiety Disorder. Further review revealed Bipolar Disorder diagnosis was not listed. An interview was conducted on 01/14/2026 at 5:25 p.m. with S10LPNADM. S10LPNADM stated she completed Resident #67's PASRR Level 1 Form, dated 07/30/2025. S10LPNADM stated she reviewed Resident #67's clinical records from the referring Hospice Agency, and the clinical records did not include the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#95) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper PPE while providing direct care to Resident #95, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Implementation of Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions with a revision date of 03/2024, revealed the following, in part:3. Enhanced Barrier Precautions - Expand the use of PPE and refers to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDRO to staff hands and clothing. I. Examples of EBP residents:-Indwelling Medical Devices- Include central linesII. EBP are indicated during:-Device care or use: central lineb. PPE:-Gowns and glove.-PPE for EBP is only…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by failing to have a certified dietary manager on staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 84 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: On 12/09/2024 at 9:06 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DA. S3DA stated the Dietary manager was fired 2-3 weeks ago and he has been acting manager until the facility was hired a new dietary manager. He stated he did not have certification in food service or dietary management. On 12/09/2024 at 11:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM further confirm him nor did any other staff in the facility have a certificate in food service or dietary management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA