St Joseph Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
2301 Sterlington Road, Monroe, LA 71203 · For profit - Partnership · 130 certified beds · (318) 323-3426 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (100%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.6% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 48.6% | 17.9% | 16.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.0% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 15.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.4% | 22.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 3.1% | 1.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 76.3% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.7% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.8% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 2.56 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.36 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 39.3–57.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.3–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.9–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 88.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by: 1) failure to effectively decontaminate the environment of residents on contact isolation with confirmed or suspected C. Difficile infection and 2) failure to properly identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they spread. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 85 residents in the facility. Findings:1. On 12/09/2025 at 9:24 a.m., S9Housekeeper reported one product was used in contact isolation rooms with confirmed or suspected C. Difficile infection and the product had to sit for 2-3 minutes on surfaces.On 12/09/2025 at 9:37 a.m., S10Housekeeper reported there were two products used in contact isolation rooms with confirmed or suspected C. Difficile infection and the product had to sit for 2-3 minutes.On 12/09/2025 at 10:34 a.m., S2DON reported that S8Housekeeping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for COVID-19 immunizations for 5 (#8, #20, #32, #92, & #106) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records included documentation that indicated the residents or resident representatives received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of COVID-19 immunization. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 85 residents residing in facility. Findings:Review of the facility's Coronavirus-COVID-19 Protocols policy dated September 2024 revealed, in part:13) All facilities must educate residents and staff on the COVID-19 vaccine (including additional doses/boosters) and offer to help get them vaccinated.Review of the medical records for Resident #8, Resident #20, Resident #32, Resident #92 and Resident #106 revealed there was no documented evidence of education regarding the benefits and potential side effects related to the COVID-19 vaccine. On 12/10/2025 at 4:00 p.m., S4RN confirmed there was no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications for 2 (#46 & #109) of 2 sampled residents observed for medications available at the bedside. Findings:Facility's Self-Administration Medications policy dated 06/14/2006 revealed, in part. Policy: A Patient may self-administer medications if the Patient is determined safe for the Patient and other Patients of the Facility by the Facility's Interdisciplinary Team. Procedure: An Assessment for Self-Administration of Medications) See [NAME] Form CFS 1-14HH) must be completed on each Patient requesting to self-administer medications and quarterly thereafter. An Assessment for Self-Administration of Medications is kept with the Patient's medical record under the Assessments tab. Resident #46 Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility 11/10/2023 with diagnoses that included polyosteoarthritis, unspecified; morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories; diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the SNF ABN Form, CMS-10055 was provided to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services for 2 (#116, #117) of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification who required the notification.Findings: Resident #116Record review revealed Resident #116's Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date was 06/24/2025. The last covered day of Part A services was 07/21/2025. The facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining. Resident #116 was discharged home. Further review revealed no documented evidence Resident #116 was provided the SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055 prior to being discharged from Medicare Part A Services. On 12/11/2025 at 8:45 a.m. an interview with S6SW and S7Business Office Manager, confirmed a SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055 was not provided to the resident or their responsible party as required prior to the resident's discharge from Medicare Part A Services. Resident #117Record review revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of chemical restraints for 1 (#38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings: Review of Resident #38's record revealed an admission date of 07/18/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, bipolar disorder current episode depressed mild or moderate severity unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #38's current physician's orders revealed the following orders, in part: 11/12/2025- Aripiprazole (AP) oral tablet 10 mg give 10 mg po 1 time a day r/t bipolar disorder;11/12/2025- Fluoxetine Hydrochloride (AD) capsule 20 mg give 1 capsule po 1 time a day for depression; and 11/17/2025- monitor for behaviors q shift, antidepressant side effect monitoring, antipsychotic side effect monitoring every shift Review of Resident #38's End…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the discharge notices were sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 (#107, #108) of 2 residents sampled for discharges. Findings:Resident #108 Review of the MDS assessments revealed Resident #108 was admitted on [DATE] and the resident left the facility Against Medical Advice which was a voluntary discharge on [DATE]. Review of the monthly emergency transfer log revealed it only included notifications for the month of December 2025. On 12/20/2025 at 2:40 p.m., interview with S3RN revealed the facility did not have access to the monthly emergency transfer logs prior to December 2025. Resident #107 Review of the MDS assessments revealed Resident #107 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The MDS assessments also revealed resident #107 was readmitted to the nursing facility on 10/14/2025 and discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the monthly emergency transfer log revealed it only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to clean and store piston syringes in accordance with facility policy for 1 (# 74) of 1 residents reviewed for enteral feedings.Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #74 had an admission date of 10/22/2025 with diagnoses which included diabetes, encephalopathy, muscle weakness and communication deficits. Review of the December 2025 physician orders revealed the resident received medications and nutritional support by way of a PEG tube.On 12/08/2025 at 1:34 p.m., observation of Resident #74's syringe at the bedside revealed the tip was filled with a yellowish fluid. The syringe was capped and the plunger was in the syringe.Review of the facility policy on piston syringe use dated May 2012 read in part.syringes used for liquids other than clear water must be rinsed appropriately, dried, and replaced in a proper storage bag or other approved container. Store syringe and plunger separately in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bedrails prior to installation for 2 (#53 and #77) of 3 residents identified for having side rails in use.Findings:Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails Policy and Procedure, revised December 2016, revealed the following, in part:General Guidelines3. An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a review of the resident's:c. Risk of entrapment from the use of side rails.Resident #77Review of Resident #77's record revealed an admission date of 09/11/2025 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, depression, unspecified dementia, and metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 (#38) of 5 residents sampled for medication review. Findings:Review of Resident #38's record revealed an admission date of 07/18/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, other seizures, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #38's current physician's orders revealed the following orders, in part: 11/11/2025- Eliquis (anticoagulant) oral tablet 5 mg give 5 mg po 2 times a day;11/11/2025- Levetiracetam (anticonvulsant) oral tablet 500 mg give 500 mg po 2 times day; and 11/13/2025- anticoagulant side effect monitoring and anticonvulsant side effect monitoring every shift.Review of Resident #38's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure grievances were investigated for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to investigate a grievance by Resident #1's RP (responsible party) promptly.Findings:Review of the facility's grievance policy dated November 2017 revealed in part:The patient or patient representative has a right to voice grievances to the facility or other entity that hears grievances without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Grievances include those with respect to care and treatment, the behavior of staff and other concerns.Guidelines:3. When the facility is made aware of a problem or concern voiced by a Patient or on behalf of the Patient, the facility must make every effort for prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights.4. The following steps should be taken for concern resolution:a. Attempt to solve the problem yourself and check back with the Patient to see if they are satisfied with the outcome.b. Involve your Executive Director or Director of Nursing Services.5. A grievance form must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to use infection control standards of practice for 1(#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents by not properly storing a resident's Foley catheter bag preventing an increased risk of contamination and infection. Resident #2's Foley catheter bag was improperly stored on the floor. Findings:Review of the facility's Catheter Care, Urinary policy (revised September 2014) presented by S1 DON (Director of Nursing) revealed in part:Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated UTI (urinary tract infections).Infection Control: Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag is kept off the floorObservation on 7/29/2025 at 11:25 a.m. with S2 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) revealed resident #2's Foley catheter noted to be lying on the floor. Resident #2 noted to be on enhanced barrier precautions according to the sign on her door.Observation on 07/30/2025 at 10:30 a.m. revealed resident #2's Foley catheter bag positioned on the floor at the side of the bed. Review of resident #2's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure nurses started a medication that had been ordered by the physician for 1(#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to start the medication Naltrexone for resident #2. Findings: Review of resident #2's record revealed in part, a Psych Evaluation, date of service July 3, 2025. Chief complaint and history of present illness, history of dementia and insomnia.Case Conceptualization: Speech unintelligible. Information obtained from staff. They describe resident #2 as being 'hypersexual' and gave examples on behavior. Resident #2 is not aggressive. Resident #2 has a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube for nutrition. Resident #2 does sleep well. Will make recommendations below and will re-assess in 1 month, sooner if needed. -Recommendations: Start trial of Naltrexone 25 mg (milligram) daily. Rationale: Naltrexone shown to reduce inappropriate behavior.Review of resident #2's July 2025 MAR (medication administration record) failed to reveal the medication Naltrexone had been started as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0627 — patternEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1) ensure a resident was permitted return to the facility after hospitalization for 3 (#1, #2, #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for transfer and discharge and; 2) have documentation a resident or resident's responsible party and the Ombudsman being notified in writing of the transfer/discharge and appeals right for 3 (#1, #2, #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. Review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated policy dated 2022 revealed the following in-part: Transfer and discharge includes movement of a resident from a certified bed in the facility to a non-certified bed in another part of the facility, or to a non-certified bed outside the facility. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same certified facility. Specifically: a. transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documentation a resident received information on resident rights and the temporary leave-bed hold policy for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings: Record review revealed resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical records revealed there was no documentation resident #2 or his responsible party received information on resident rights and all regulations governing the resident conduct and responsibilities during his stay. On 04/30/2025 at 12:25 p.m. an interview with S1Administrator revealed he was not able to locate resident #2's admission packet. S1Administrator confirmed they did not have documentation resident #2 or his responsible party received information on resident rights and the temporary leave-bed hold policy.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 (#323) of 1 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Self -Administration of Medications policy and procedure dated 06/14/2006 revealed: A patient may self-administer medications if the patient is determined safe for the patient and other patients of the facility by the facility's interdisciplinary team. Procedure: An assessment for Self-Administration of Medications must be competed on each Patient requesting to self-administer medications and quarterly thereafter. An assessment for self-administration of Medications is kept with the Patient's medical record under the Assessment tab. If it has been determined the Patient is capable of self-administering his/her medications, a physician order must be obtained, a care plan formulated, and staff in-serviced. The nursing staff must interview the Patient on every shift to verify that all self-administered doses on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #62 Review of the medical record for resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/14/2024 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, epilepsy, malignant neoplasm, protein calorie malnutrition, and dehydration. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #62's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99 which indicated that the resident was unable to complete the interview. Resident #62 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the current care plan revealed resident #62 required extensive assistance with eating. Further review of the care plan revealed interventions were to allow the resident adequate time to eat, monitor his food intake at each meal, and to document the meal percentage consumed. Review of the resident #62's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Verification Worksheet for daily meal intake percentages revealed there was no documented evidence of the breakfast, lunch and dinner meal percentage intakes on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 7 (#3, #16, #41, #45,#58, #62 and #221) of 11 (#3, #16, #37, #40, #41, #45, #58, #62, 221, #223, and #324) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. The facility failed to ensure 1) residents' fingernails were kept clean and/or trimmed for #16, #41, #58 and #62, and 2) residents #3, #45 and #221 received baths as scheduled. Findings: Resident #62 Review of the medical record for resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/14/2024 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, hypertension, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, malignant neoplasm, protein calorie malnutrition, dehydration and chronic pain. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #62's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99 which indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible by not completing an Accident/Incident report when a resident was found sitting on the floor for 1 (#62) of 3 (#51, #62, and #222) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's Accident/Incidents Policy dated May 2016 revealed: 1 An Accident/Incident Report must be completed immediately upon facility staff becoming aware of the occurrence of an accident/incident (to include medication errors) involving a Patient and, if necessary, the Patient's Care Plan must be updated. Review of the facility's Fall Management Guidelines policy dated November 2022 revealed: 1. Definition Unintentional change in position coming to rest on the ground, floor or onto the next lower surface. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. Review of the medical record for resident #62…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (#2, #323, and #325) of 3 (#2, #323, #325) residents sampled for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure 1) Resident's oxygen concentrator filters were clean for (#2, #323) and 2) The resident's nebulizer equipment and tubing were dated and stored appropriately for (#323, #325). Findings: Resident #2 On 09/30/2024 at 3:16 p.m. observation of resident #2's oxygen concentrator revealed the filter on the back of the machine was dirty. Further observation of the oxygen administration revealed resident #2 received 2 liters per minute (lpm) per nasal cannula. Observation of the oxygen tubing revealed there was no date or initial on the humidification bottle or the oxygen tubing. On 10/01/2024 at 8:57 a.m. observation of the oxygen concentrator revealed the filter remained dirty. On 10/01/2024 at 11:58 a.m. observation of the oxygen concentrator with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the filter on the back of the machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and/or reviewed the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident's representative and/or obtain an informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for 5 (#9, #16, #31, #40, and #62) of 6 (#9, #16, #31, #40, #51, and #62) residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Bed Safety and Bed Rails dated August 2022 revealed in part: Policy Statement Resident beds meet the safety specifications established by the Hospital Bed Safety Workgroup. The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met. 7. The resident assessment also determines potential risks to the resident associated with the use of bed rails, including the following: a. Accident hazards: (1) The resident could attempt to climb over, around, between, or through the rails. Or over the foot board; and/or (2) A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was free from unnecessary medication use for 5 (#3, #37, #43, #49, and #51) of 5 (#3, #37, #43, #49, and #51) residents sampled for unnecessary medication review. The physician/prescriber failed to provide a rationale for continuation of psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #3 Review of resident #3's record revealed an admission date of 06/17/2021 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, other schizoaffective disorders, pain unspecified, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and long term use of opiate analgesics. Review of resident #3's September 2024 Physician's Orders revealed orders for the following psychotropic medications which require a gradual dose reduction (GDR): Seroquel, Buspirone, Lorazepam, Fluoxetine, and Haloperidol. Review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber for resident #3 dated 05/27/2024 revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to securely store medications in a resident's room per the policy and procedure when self-administering medication for 1 (#323) of 1 (#323) residents self-administering medications. Findings: Resident #323 Review of the faclity's Self - Administration of Medications policy and procedure dated 06/14/2006 revealed: A patient may self-administer medications if the patient is determined safe for the patient and other patients of the facility by the facility's interdisciplinary team. Procedure: An assessment for Self-Administration of Medications must be competed on each patient requesting to self-administer medications and quarterly thereafter. An assessment for self-administration of medications is kept with the patient's medical record under the Assessment tab. If it has been determined the patient is capable of self-administering his/her medications, a physician order must be obtained, a care plan formulated, and staff in-serviced. The nursing staff must interview the patient on every shift to verify that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interviews the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 4 (#7, #45, #321, #322,) of 4 (#7, #45, #321, #322) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precations (EBP) policy dated March 2024 revealed in part: EBP is an infection control intervention to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Infections or colonization with a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) targeted MDRO when Contact Precautions do not apply otherwise; or Chronic wounds (pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds and venous stasis ulcers) and/or indwelling medical devices (devices fully embedded in the body, ie central lines, hemodialysis catheters, urinary catheters, feeding tubes and trach tubes) even if the resident is not known to be infected or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to retain the resident's personal possessions, including clothing, by not having a system in place to record residents' personal belongings. The facility failed to have an inventory record of the resident's personal belongings for 1 (#62) of 2 (#42 and #62) residents reviewed for personal property. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/14/2024 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, hypertension, epilepsy, insomnia, acute kidney failure, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, malignant neoplasm, protein calorie malnutrition, dehydration, and chronic pain. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #62's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99 which indicated the resident was unable to complete the interview. Resident #62 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the record revealed resident #62 did not have an inventory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent state inspection results since the last annual survey were available for resident or family review. Findings: An observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 7:35 a.m. revealed the results of the last survey in the facility's survey binder was the last annual survey dated 09/13/2023. Further review of the survey binder revealed the last complaint survey results dated 08/16/2024 were not in the binder. An interview on 09/30/2024 at 7:40 a.m. with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility's survey binder did not have the most recent survey results for the complaint dated 08/16/2024.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#3) of 3 (#3, #62, and #222) residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to transport resident #3 to her appointment in a timely manner to ensure she was seen by the physician. Findings: A telephone interview on 10/01/2024 at 11:53 a.m. with resident #3's son revealed that resident was taken to an appointment out of town today by the facility, and the appointment had to be rescheduled for 10/25/2024 due to resident #3 arrived late for her appointment. Review of the transportation appointments for 10/01/2024 revealed resident #3 had an appointment with a psychiatrist out of town at 9:00 a.m. Review of the current care plan revealed resident #3 currently takes psychotropic medications as evidenced by depression, anxiety, and insomnia and to obtain a psychiatric consult as needed. An interview on 10/01/2024 at 12:15 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to obtain a hemoglobin A1C and lipid panel for 1 (#49) of 5 (#3, #37, #43, #49, #51) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Record review revealed resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, insomnia, anemia, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, arthritis, pain unspecified, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and mood disturbance. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Nursing letter dated 08/29/2024 revealed the following recommendation: I did not find any labs ordered routinely. Please verify we are monitoring labs (lithium, hemoglobin A1C, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Complete Metabolic Profile (CMP) and Lipid levels), if not please follow up with the prescriber to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted to the facility with a surgical wound was provided care and treatment to the wound for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1 - #5) sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Review of the resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/2023 with diagnoses that included gross hematuria, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, cachexia, left hip fracture, hypertension, and anemia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively aware and able to make daily decisions. Further review revealed he needed assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Further review revealed under skin conditions the surgical wound was noted. Review of the nursing admission assessment completed on 12/15/2023 revealed no documentation of the surgical wound to the left hip. Review of the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for 2 (#2 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 and Resident #3 from inappropriate sexual advances by Resident #1. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Protocol dated April 2019 revealed the following, in part: 1. The Patient has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required in treating the Patient's symptoms. 7. e. Sexual abuse is defined as, but is not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault, or any nonconsensual sexual contact of any type with the Patient. Resident #1 A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/01/2023 with diagnoses of acute kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to inform the resident's responsible party of a resident's change in condition for 2 (#5 and #6) of 4 (#4, #5, #6 and #7) records reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify 1) resident #5's responsible party when she expired on [DATE], and 2) resident #6's responsible party when the facility had to reschedule 2 psychiatric appointments. Findings: Review of the facility's Change in Condition Policy and Procedure with a revised date of [DATE] revealed: Policy: To identify and evaluate a change in condition and notify the Physician and Responsible Party when indicated. A significant change in Resident's status is any sign or symptom that is: Acute or sudden onset A marked change (i.e., more severe) in relation to usual signs and symptoms New or worsening symptom Examples include but are not limited to the following: cardiovascular, respiratory, behavioral, fall with major injury, infection, dehydration, altered mental status, pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene by, not having documented evidence that residents received baths as scheduled for 1 (#6) of 3 (#5, #6 and #7) records reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #6 revealed an admission date of 06/17/2021 with diagnoses including anemia, acute bronchitis, edema, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revealed a problem regarding ADL functions with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (#6) of 3 (#4, #6 and #7) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #6 revealed an admission date of 06/17/2021 with diagnoses including anemia, acute bronchitis, edema, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the care plan revealed resident #6 was at risk for skin integrity and for a soft brace to be worn while in the bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. The facility failed to ensure 1) resident #1 was administered medications per physician orders, and 2) the nurses documented the amount of sliding scale insulin administered to resident #2 in a total of 3 residents reviewed for medications. Findings: Resident 1 Review of the medical record for sampled resident #1 revealed an admission date of 11/03/2023 and a discharge date of 11/30/2023. Resident #1 had diagnoses including cellulitis of the umbilicus, transient ischemic attack, Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, acute kidney failure, anemia, diabetes mellitus and epilepsy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition for daily decision making and required assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (#74) of 2 (#74, #131) sampled residents reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice was evidenced by staff members calling resident #74 a name other than his legal name. Findings: Record review revealed resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cervical spinal stenosis, hemiplegia following cerebrovascular accident, muscle weakness, pain, and skin damage. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) data dated 08/10/2023 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Section G- Mobility in the MDS revealed resident #74 was dependent on staff with at least one person assistance for bed mobility, transferring, locomotion on the unit, locomotion off the unit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the type of care giver or professional that will be providing services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 70 residents who resided in the facility as per the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Form. Findings: Review of the current policy and procedure titled Identification Name Badges revealed all employees were required to wear identification name tags or badges during their work shift. On 09/12/2023 at 09:30 a.m. wound care was observed for Resident #74 by S3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Treatment Nurse. As S3 LPN/Treatment Nurse provided wound care, S15 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) knocked on the door and entered the room. S15 CNA asked S3LPN if she needed assistance. S3 LPN/Treatment Nurse accepted the offer for help. S15 CNA did not have a name tag on her uniform and she did not introduce herself to anyone in the room. Observation on 09/11/2023 at 8:08 a.m. revealed S10LPN did not have a name tag displayed. Observation on 09/12/2023 at 7:46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment which included the resident's dental assessment for 1 (#6) of 1 (#6) residents reviewed for dental care. Findings: Record review for resident #6 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type 2 diabetes, and morbid obesity. On 09/12/2023 at 4:25 p.m., resident # 6 was in her room in bed. Resident reported that she would like to have her front teeth removed. An observation revealed she had missing and broken front upper teeth. Review of resident #6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review of Section L (Oral/Dental Status) revealed the facility failed to identify that resident #6 had broken natural teeth. On 09/13/2023 at 3:30 p.m., an interview with S7Licensed Practical Nurse/Minimum Data Set Nurse (LPN/MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered plan of care to attain or maintain a resident's highest practicable physical well-being for 2 (#74, #131) of 4 (#60, #70, #74, #131) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to have evidence that the residents were turned and repositioned every 2 hours and received incontinent care as stated in the careplan for resident #74 and resident #131. Findings: Resident 131 Review of the medical record for sampled resident #131 revealed an admission date of 01/13/2014 with diagnoses that include dementia, acute cystitis with hematuria, coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with right side paralysis, blindness, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicates the resident is cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) by failing to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (#13, #36, and #281) of 7 (#13, #36, #45, #67, #74, #131, and #281) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings: Resident #36 Review of the medical record for resident #36 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part of osteomyelitis, diabetes, hypertension, and bilaterally below the knee amputation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had independent cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident required one person extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene and the resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the care plan revealed: personal hygiene - resident requires extensive assistance. Further review of the interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#35) of 1 resident reviewed for nonpressure related wound care and for 1 (#54) of 1 resident reviewed for positioning. The facility failed to provide wound care for resident #35 as ordered by the physician and failed to provide appropriate positioning while feeding resident #54. Findings: Resident #35 Review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses, in part: nutritional deficiency, pain, wound on right great toe, cerebral infarction, multiple sclerosis, and epileptic seizures related to external causes. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure ulcers by failing to have evidence that the residents were turned and repositioned every 2 hours, and received incontinent care for 2 (#74, #131) of 4 (#60, #70, #74, #131) residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident 131 Review of the medical record for sampled resident #131 revealed an admission date of 01/13/2014 with diagnoses that include dementia, acute cystitis with hematuria, coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with right side paralysis, blindness, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicates the resident is cognitively impaired and unable to make daily decisions. Further review revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who requires such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and resident's preference by failing to administer pain medication for 1 (#281) of 2 (#17, #281) residents reviewed for pain management. Findings: On 09/11/2023 at 8:39 a.m. an interview with Resident #281 revealed both hands were numb and he had knots all over his back that are very painful. Resident #281 revealed he has pain all the time. He reported he only gets some Tylenol and Aspirin. Resident #281 reported he received hospice services at home and thought he was supposed to receive hospice services at the facility. He reported he was getting Morphine at home. Resident #281 reported he had a terminal illness and he didn`t understand why he had to be in pain if he was not going to survives. On 09/12/2023 at 9:20 a.m. an interview with Resident #281 revealed he got some pain medicine last night and early this morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for a resident's needs by: 1.) nurses failing to respond to a resident's call light in a timely manner for 1 (#131) of 1 (#131) resident's call lights observed, and 2.) having a Licensed Practical Nurse change the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dressings instead of a Registered Nurse for 1 (#60) of 1 (#60) resident that had a PICC line. Findings: Resident #131 Record review for sampled resident #131 revealed an admission date of 01/13/2014 with diagnoses that include dementia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident with right side paralysis, blindness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and was unable to make daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0729 — patternVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure State Registry verifications were obtained prior to hire for 4 (S5Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), S11CNA, S12CNA, S14CNA) and also failed to ensure they were obtained monthly for 5 (S5CNA, S6CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S14CNA) of 5 (S5CNA, S6CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S14CNA) personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of the personnel file for S5Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed a hire date of 07/20/2023. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence of a CNA state registry verification that was obtained upon hire or monthly thereafter. Review of the personnel file for S6CNA Supervisor revealed a hire date of 05/07/2007. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence that a CNA state registry verification was obtained monthly. Review of the personnel file for S11CNA revealed a hire date of 03/02/2022. Further review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence of a CNA state registry verification that was obtained upon hire or monthly thereafter. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 3 (#62, #70, and #74) of 6 (#6, #7, #22 #62, #70, and #74) sampled resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to follow parameters for the administration of a blood pressure medication for resident #62 and failed to monitor resident #70 and #74 for edema while receiving a diuretic. Findings: Resident #62 Review of the record revealed resident #62 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Human Immunodeficiency Virus, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, heart failure, and hypertension. Review of the September 2023 physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/12/2023 for Lisinopril 5 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth (PO) daily. Review of the August 2023 and September 2023 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed parameters for administering blood pressure medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAUDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BOULWARE ST JAMES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 12/01/2025 |
| STEVEN BOULWARE FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BAUDER, KELLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BAUDER, MADISON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BAUDER, PARKER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BOULWARE, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 12/01/2025 |
| WALKER, KATIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 12/01/2025 |
| BOULWARE, DOUGLAS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| BOULWARE, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| PRIORITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| BAUDER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/11/2026 |
| BRIDGEPOINTE FINANICAL SERVICES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195359. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.