No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spring Lake Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

8622 Line Avenue, Shreveport, LA 71106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (318) 868-4126 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 868-4126 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 14 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8525 Line Ave · (318) 300-4926 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8625 Line Ave · (318) 673-8360 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
300 W 84th St · (207) 874-7483 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S Emerald Loop · (318) 212-0220 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.1%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms65.5%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.8%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%15.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.1%22.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%76.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%28.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%14.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.212.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.562.741.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
86.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.64U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 86.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.6%CMS range 35.2–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.8–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge86.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 5.8–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 120.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 (#10, #86) of 40 sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for Resident #10 and Resident #86. Findings:Review of Resident #10's medical records revealed an admit date of 10/21/2025 including the following diagnoses, in part: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile recurrent (11/01/2025).Review of Resident #10's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/10/2025 for Fluconozole 50mg (milligram) by mouth once daily for 7 days.Review of Resident #10's November medication administration record failed to reveal Fluconazole 50mg once daily x 7 days was administered for the full 7 days. Further review revealed the first dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 1 (#113) of 40 residents in the sample. The facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices by leaving medications at the bedside.Findings:Review of facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy with a Revision date of December 2016 revealed in part:Policy StatementResidents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff with the assistance from the practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident.2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the interdisciplinary team will perform an assessment of Self Administration of Medications Form, or equivalent including (but not limited to) the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) for 2 (#17, #131) of 3 (#17, #31, #131) residents reviewed for ADL care of dependent residents. The facility failed to trim and clean Resident #17's fingernails and bathe/shower Resident #131. Findings: Review of the facility's Care of Fingernails/Toenails policy revised 10/2010 included in part:PurposeThe purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infectionsGeneral Guidelines1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming.4. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. Review of Facility's Shower/Tub Bath policy and procedure revised October 2010 revealed in part: Documentation - The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason (s) why and the intervention taken. 6. The signature and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to follow up with the physician in a timely manner to implement the registered dieticians (RD) recommendation for 1 (#99) of 6 (#1, #16, #25, #86, #99 and #132) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings:Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/28/2025 with the following diagnoses, not limited to, muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness (generalized) and need for assistance with personal care.Review of Resident #99's weights revealed a significant 17.93% (33 pounds) weight loss in 73 days from dates 08/29/2025 (184 pounds) and 11/10/2025 (151 pounds).Review of Resident #99's physician orders for dates 09/01/2025 through 12/03/2025 failed to reveal recommendations from S7RD and S8RD were implemented:On 09/16/2025 S8 RD recommended: three times a day house shake supplements for 90 days.On 11/20/2025 S7RD recommended: two times a day house shake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interview, the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#117) of 1 (#117) resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to date and store hand held nebulizer mask and tubing in a covered bag. Findings: Review of Facility's policy and procedure for oxygen administration revised February 2025 revealed in part: 6. Nebulizer tubing will be changed within 7-10 days, or if visibly soiled. 6. Store nebulizer equipment in a covered device (i.e. plastic bag, kangaroo pouch) between uses.Review of Resident #117's medical records revealed an admit date of 11/05/2025 with the following diagnoses, in part: severe persistent asthma uncomplicated and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of Resident #117's physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/25/2025 for Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 mcg(microgram)/Act(actuation)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to complete their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain proper grooming for 1 (#48) of 3 (#2, #34, #48) residents reviewed for ADL. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48 received nail care. Findings: Review of Resident #48's medical diagnoses revealed the following, but not limited to cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Review of Resident #48's September 2024 physician orders dated 05/08/2024 revealed: Activity as tolerated. Licensed nurse may clip and trim diabetic finger and toenails as indicated. Review of Resident #48's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) dated 07/08/2024 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) was 15 out of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Review of Resident #48's care plan revealed resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit and requires assistance with ADL. Observation on 09/23/2024 at 11:03 A.M. revealed Resident #48 sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to accurately submit mandatory direct care staffing information to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 3 2024 (April 1-June 31). Findings: Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1-June 31) revealed triggers for the following: One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. During an interview on 09/25/2024 at 12:30 p.m. S1 Administrator reported he did not understand why the facility triggered for low staffing. S1 Administrator reported he is the only person at the facility that submits agency invoices to the corporate office. S1 Administrator further reported the corporate office submits the PBJ data to the CMS system.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and skin conditions. The facility failed to perform a skin and wound evaluation upon admission and weekly for Resident #1. Findings: Review of medical records revealed Resident #1 with an admit date of 04/18/2024 with the following diagnosis, in part: muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified/multiples sites, primary generalized (osteo) arthritis, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty walking/not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet, Peripheral Vascular Disease/unspecified, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents plan of care reviewed. Findings: Review of medical records revealed Resident #1 with an admit date of 04/18/2024 and discharge date of 05/11/2024 with the following diagnosis, in part: muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified/multiples sites, primary generalized (osteo) arthritis, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty walking/not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet, Peripheral Vascular Disease/unspecified, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) admission Assessment revealed a date of 04/21/2024. The comprehensive care plan was initiated on 04/19/2024 with only one problem and approach - activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. During an interview on 06/04/2023 at 8:25 a.m. S4 MDS Nurse acknowledged Resident #1's care plan included one problem and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The facility failed to administer pain medication for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents receiving pain medication. Findings: Review of medical records revealed Resident #1 with an admit date of 04/18/2024 with the following diagnosis, in part: muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified/multiples sites, primary generalized (osteo) arthritis, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty walking/not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet, Peripheral Vascular Disease/unspecified, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed the following orders: - 05/09/24 - hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 7.5-325mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity and care in a manner that promotes maintenance of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 resident (#102) of 3 residents (#62, #102, #106) residents investigated for dignity. Findings: Review of Resident #102's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #102's clinical record revealed an admission date of 03/02/2023 with the following diagnoses in part: aphasia, hemiplegia affecting the left side, muscle wasting and atrophy, cognitive communication deficit. Review of Occupational Therapy Notes dated 06/30/2023 revealed Resident #102 was feeling mistreated at the facility due to CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) not answering the call light. During an interview on 08/07/2023 at 1:49 a.m. Resident #102 reported every time S6CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each Resident's basic needs. The facility failed to provide the minimum required staffing hours for 8 of 25 weekend days reviewed. Findings: Review on the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 to March 31) revealed the submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. Review of the facility's staffing pattern reports for weekends from FY Quarter 2 2023 revealed the facility provided 238 hours on 01/08/2023 and were required to provide 268 hours. Further review revealed the facility provided 267 hours on 01/14/2023 and were required to provide 277 hours, provided 249 hours on 01/22/2023 and were required to provide 280 hours, provided 260 hours on 01/29/2023 and were required to provide 261 hours, provided 247 hours on 02/19/2023 and were required to provide 260 hours, provided 214 hours on 02/26/2023 and were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competencies to provide care, assure residents' safety, and maintain the residents' highest practicable physical well-being. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff assessed a resident for injury in a timely manner and before the resident was moved following a witnessed fall for 1 (#16) of 3 (#2, #16, #77) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of Resident #16's record revealed an admit date of 11/07/2020 and diagnoses including Paraplegia unspecified, unspecified muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and a history of falling. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/14/2023 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's incident logs revealed Resident #16 had a witnessed fall in his room on 07/09/2023 at 6:58 a.m. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the provider failed to ensure a Medical Director or designee attended a quarterly QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee meeting for the second quarter of the year 2023. Findings: Record review of the provider's quarterly QAA Committee meetings failed to reveal a signature of the Medical Director or designee for the second quarter of the year 2023. During an interview on 08/09/2023 at 4:50 p.m., S2 Director of Nursing reviewed the quarterly QAA Committee meetings that were held on the months of April, May, and June of 2023. S2 Director of Nursing verified a signature was not completed by the Medical Director or designee for the second quarter of 2023 QAA Committee meetings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.4+1.6 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpine Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationRuston, LA 1 of 5Bridgeport Medical LodgeBridgeport, TX 1 of 5Camelot Rehabilitation At Magnolia ParkLafayette, LA 1 of 5Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationBossier City, LA 1 of 5Hilltop Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationBossier City, LA 1 of 5Shreveport Manor Skilled Nursing & RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5St Joseph Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationMonroe, LA 1 of 5The Bradford Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5The Guest House Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationShreveport, LA 2 of 5Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and RehabilitShreveport, LA 2 of 5Decatur Medical LodgeDecatur, TX 2 of 5Resthaven Living CenterBogalusa, LA 2 of 5Ridgmar Medical LodgeFort Worth, TX 3 of 5Broadmoor Medical LodgeRockwall, TX 3 of 5Camelot Of BroussardBroussard, LA 3 of 5Chateau St. James Rehab And RetirementLutcher, LA 3 of 5Louisiana Extended Care Hospital Of LafayetteLafayette, LA 3 of 5Mabank Nursing CenterMabank, TX 3 of 5Royse City Medical LodgeRoyse City, TX 3 of 5The Homestead of DenisonDenison, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Healthcare CenterLeesville, LA 3 of 5Timber Springs Rehab and RetirementSpringhill, LA 4 of 5Belterra Health & RehabMcKinney, TX 4 of 5College Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWeatherford, TX 4 of 5Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent CenterNew Orleans, LA 4 of 5Mansfield Medical LodgeMansfield, TX 4 of 5The Parks at Garland Healthcare and RehabGarland, TX 4 of 5Victoria Gardens Of AllenAllen, TX 4 of 5Victoria Gardens of FriscoFrisco, TX 4 of 5Vista Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 4 of 5Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care CenterLubbock, TX 5 of 5Camelot BrooksideJennings, LA 5 of 5Chateau D'Ville Rehab and RetirementDonaldsonville, LA 5 of 5Chateau Terrebonne Health Care CenterHouma, LA 5 of 5Grapevine Medical LodgeGrapevine, TX 5 of 5Springtown Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterSpringtown, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SDB HOLDINGSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2019
BAUDER, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2019
BOULWARE, DOUGLASIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2019
BOULWARE, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2019
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
PROGRESSIVE REHAB SOLUTIONS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
COLVIN, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
GREGGS, LATONYAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/26/2021
LEBON, CHARLESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 23%Other / private 18%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$389per resident / day
operating cost
$11,839per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next