No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Camelot Rehabilitation At Magnolia Park

1511 Dulles Drive, Lafayette, LA 70506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (337) 216-0950 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (337) 216-0950 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0568)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 35% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
609 Guilbeau Rd · (337) 981-6430 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid<0.1 mi
2252 Ambassador Caffery Pkwy · (337) 988-7280 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2308 Ambassador Caffery Pkwy · (337) 989-7149 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1919 Eraste Landry Rd · (337) 291-8370 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1709 Dulles Dr · (337) 981-6438

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.6%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.8%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.1%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.8%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%22.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%76.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%28.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%14.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.072.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.322.741.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.77U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.9%CMS range 30.7–47.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.9–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.8–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.501.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.12
RN hours/ resident / day
1.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.07
RN hoursweekends
62.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 125.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-04)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for safe administration of medications evidenced by the staff nurse leaving 20 medications unattended at the bedside for 1 (#74) out of 32 initial pool residents.Findings:Review of Resident #74's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, gout, epilepsy, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus.A review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of Resident #74's March 2026 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed S6ALPN had initialed that the following medications had been administered on the morning of 03/02/2026: Amiodarone HCl (hydrochloride) oral tablet 200 mg (milligram); Ascorbic Acid tablet 500 mg; Cholecalciferol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to:1. Maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen; and 2. Store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety;This had the potential to affect 101 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. The facility's census was 125.Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Sanitization, with a last review date of 10/13/2025, revealed in part: Policy Statement: The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. 1. All kitchen, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies and other insects. 2. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosion, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Seals, hinges and fasteners will be kept in good repair. 3. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure individual financial records were provided to the resident through quarterly statements for 1 (Resident #68) out of 1 (Resident #68) resident investigated for personal funds.Findings:Review of Resident #68's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.A review of Resident #68's admission Record under the Contacts section revealed Resident #68's name, contact type: Responsible Party (RP), and relationship: self.On 03/02/2026 at 11:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #68. Resident #68 stated she did not receive quarterly statements for her personal funds account.On 03/04/2026 at 8:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5BM. S5BM stated financial statements for personal fund accounts were sent out quarterly. She stated if a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed accurately for 3 (Resident #12, Resident # 74, and Resident #91) out of 37 sampled residents, as evidenced by:Inaccurate coding of administration of Insulin injections and orders for insulin in Section N- Medications for Resident #12 and Resident #74, and Inaccurate coding for serious mental illness in Section A for Resident #91.Findings:Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, encephalopathy, gastrostomy status, tracheostomy status, dysphagia, aphasia and persistent vegetative state. Further review of the record revealed no evidence the resident was diabetic and receiving insulin. Review of Resident #12's February 2026 eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed the resident was not administered insulin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was developed, implemented, and/or maintained in an effective and comprehensive manner. The facility failed to maintain documentation of evidence of its ongoing facility QAPI program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 133 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 02/04/2025 at 3:00 PM titled, QAPI Program (unknown original date documented) with a revised date of 12/2016, revealed the following in part .all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts .the QAPI program has been developed to incorporate the continuous quality improvement and quality assurance processes consisting of ongoing analysis of clinical data and program results, identifying and prioritizing opportunities for improvement, implementing interventions, and evaluating the effectiveness of those intervention on the quality of care and services. On 02/04/2025 at 11:40 AM and 2:45 PM, the surveyor requested that S2DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addresses the facility's performance improvement activities and projects. The facility failed to provide evidence of the number and frequency of improvement projects conducted, which addressed the scope and complexity of the facility's provided services. This deficient practice had to potential to affect 133 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 02/04/2025 at 3:00 PM titled, QAPI Program (unknown original date) with a revised date of 12/2016 revealed the following in part .all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts .the QAPI program has been developed to incorporate the continuous quality improvement and quality assurance processes consisting of ongoing analysis of clinical data and program results, identifying and prioritizing opportunities for improvement, implementing interventions, and evaluating the effectiveness of those intervention on the quality of care and services .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Provide evidence that Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly and as needed; and 2. Provide evidence that ensured the QAA committee was composed of at a minimum: the DON (Director of Nursing, Medical Director or his/her designee, the Infection Preventionist (IP), and at least three other staff, one of whom must be the facility's administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role who has knowledge of facility systems and the authority to change those systems. This deficient practice had to potential to affect 133 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 02/04/2025 at 3:00 PM titled, QAPI Program (unknown original date) with a revised date of 12/2016, revealed the following in part .all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts .the QAPI program has been developed to incorporate the continuous quality improvement and quality assurance processes consisting of ongoing analysis of clinical data and program results,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evidenced by: 1. Observations made on 02/05/2025 on Hall U of multiple rooms walls with damaged sheetrock, unfinished sheetrock repair, and a call light unit detached from wall; 2. Housekeeping staff failing to clean and sanitize room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall U after a resident was discharged to the hospital; 3. Observation made on 02/02/2025 at 2:50 PM of a light fixture that was not working properly in room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall Y; 4. Observation made on 02/02/2025 at 1:07 PM of a call light box that was detached from the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall Y; and 5. Observation made on 02/02/2025 at 2:01 PM of an electrical outlet cover plate that was bent away from wall making electrical wiring visible in room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall Y. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Maintenance Service with a revised date 10/30/24 revealed the following in part, Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers for 2 (#95 and #108) out of 6 (#8, #10, #53, #95, #108 and #112) residents investigated for pressure ulcers by: 1. Filing to perform weekly wound assessments for pressure ulcers for Resident # 95; and 2. Failing to conduct accurate skin assessments for Resident # 108 Resident #95 Review of Resident #95's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 01/14/2025 with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Morbid Severe Obesity Due To Excess Calories, Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure, Cirrhosis Of Liver, and Diarrhea. Review of Resident #95's Nurses' Notes dated 01/15/2025 revealed in part: Resident admitted from LGMC .Wound care assessment done .Resident noted having stage 3 pressure ulcer to sacral cornu .measuring 1.5cm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents in 1 (Med Room C) of 4 (Med Room A, Med Room B, Med Room C, and Med Room D) medication rooms. This deficient practice had to potential to affect 133 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 02/04/2025 at 12:38 PM titled Storage of Medications (unknown original date) with a revised date of 04/2019, revealed the following in part . the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner . 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas are in a safe manner . 5. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed . Observation on 02/02/2025 at 2:50 PM, of Med Room C with S9LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: 1. opened food items in the walk in cooler not labeled with the date and time; and 2. expired foods in the dry storage area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 116 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: On 02/02/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a last revision date of July 2014, last reviewed date of 10/30/2024, revealed in part . Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .6. Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). Such foods will be rotated using a first in-first out system. 7. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) . On 02/02/2025 at 8:30 AM, a tour of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was worn while proving care for 3 (#53, #95, #118) out of 36 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #95 On 02/04/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Cheat Sheet with a last reviewed date of 10/30/2024 read in part, Examples of Enhanced-Based Precaution Residents: Wounds-includes .pressure ulcers .indwelling medical devices .feeding tubes .Enhanced-Based Precautions are indicated during: .changing briefs or assisting with toileting .Implementation: gowns and gloves are used during high-contact sessions . Review of Resident #95's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) was coded accurately for use of Bipap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) for 1 (#19) resident of 5 (#19, #41, #78, #95 and #112) residents investigated for respiratory care. Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with unspecified complications, Major Depressive Disorder and other, Sleep Apnea. Review of Resident #19's current physician's orders read, RCU (Respiratory Care Unit): Bipap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) S/T (Spontaneous/Timed) 16/12 RR (Respiration Rate) = 12 @ 21% at HS (Hour of Sleep) six times a day. Review of Resident #19's care plan read in part, Focus: The resident has Bipap related to sleep apnea. Review of Resident #19's MAR/TAR (Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record) for November 2024 revealed Resident #19 used a Bipap nightly as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services, treatment, and care according to standards of professional practice for 1 (#3) of 4 (#3, #38, #62, and #78) residents that were reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI (urinary tract infection). The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's urinary catheter drainage tubing was properly secured off of the floor. Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Bladder Neck Obstruction. Review of Resident #3 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed in Section GG Chair/bed-to-chair transfer that Resident #3 was coded as 3, indicating that the resident required partial/moderate assistance. On 02/02/2025 at 9:55 AM, an observation was conducted of Resident #3 in his room. The resident had a urinary catheter drainage bag laying on the floor roughly one foot away from the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's respiratory equipment was stored properly for 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #41) out of 5 (Resident #19, #41, #78, #95 and #112) 36 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. On 02/04/2025 review of the facility's policy titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention Infection with a review date of 10/30/2024 read in part, Infection Control Considerations Related to Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol: 7. Store the circuit in plastic bag marked with date and resident's name, between uses. On 02/04/2025 at 4:17 PM, S2DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed that this is the policy used for proper storage of all respiratory equipment. Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Unspecified Complications, Major Depressive Disorder and Other, Sleep Apnea. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information posted daily was current and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility's census was 133. Findings: On 02/04/2025 at 2:00 PM, an observation was made of staffing data sheets filed in a closed binder. The binder was set in a window at the nurses' station directly across the hall from the administrative offices. The hall was not in a pathway frequently used by residents or visitors. The staffing sheets for 02/03/2025 and 02/04/2025 were not in the binder. On 02/04/2025 at 2:09 PM, an interview was conducted with S7ASADMIN (Assistant Administrator). She confirmed that staffing data sheets for 02/03/2025 and 02/04/2025 were not in the binder and staffing sheets that are in a closed binder are not readily accessible to residents or visitors.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure hallway hand rails were securely affixed to the walls on 1 (Hall W) of 6 (Hall U, Hall V, Hall W, Hall X, Hall Y, and Hall Z) hallways observed in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect all mobile residents that reside on Hall W. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 02/04/2025 at 12:38 PM titled, Maintenance Service with a revision date of 12/2009 revealed the following in part . 1. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. 2. Functions of the maintenance personnel include . a. Maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines. b. Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards. 9. Maintenance personnel shall follow established safety regulations to ensure the safety and well-being of all concerned . Observations made on 02/02/2025 at 9:52 AM, 02/02/2025 at 11:20 AM, 02/02/2025 at 12:10 PM, and 02/02/2025 at 12:15 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided as outlined in the comprehensive plan of care for 2 (#28 and #63) out of 45 sampled residents by failing to ensure that: 1. Resident #28 had appropriate interventions for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care related to Amputation. 2. Resident #63's physician orders were followed. Findings: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Type Two Diabetes, Acquired Absence of left leg above the knee, and Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below the Knee. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that he was care planned on 01/29/2024 for ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) amputation, with the following interventions in part: 1) Bathing: Resident is independent with bathing. No assistance required. 2) Bed mobility: Resident is independent with bed mobility. No assistance required.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure compromised cans in the dry storage room were disposed; 2. Failed to ensure food products were discarded on or before the expiration date; 3. Failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in sanitary condition. Findings: An observation was made on 01/29/2024 at 08: 36 a.m. of the facility's walk-in pantry with S5FKS (Kitchen Supervisor) which included: -Five compromised dented cans which included: 1 can of slice beets, 2 cans of Mandarin, 1 can of apple slices, and 1 can of cream style corn) -Three expired loaves of bread with expiration date of 01/20/2024 -Two expired loaves of bread with expiration date of 01/27/2024 -Scoops stored in plastic Ziploc bags that had dried food particles on it -Old and dried food matter was observed on the wall above the food preparation table. On 1/29/2024 at 8:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5KS. She confirmed the cans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess 2 residents (#56 and #70) out of 45 sampled residents for self-administration of medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Self- Administration of Medications read in part .Residents have the right to self - administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so .4. The resident must sign the Consent for Administration of Medication Form regarding and agree to abide by the restrictions for handling and storage of medication according to one of the following plans. 5. Any bedside medications will meet all the required labeling specifications and guidelines required of any medications in the facility .9. The nursing staff will routinely check self- administered medications and will remove expired, discontinued, or recalled medications. Resident #56: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate and take corrective actions for a grievance made by 1 (#56) out of a total sample of 45 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating read in part: Policy Statement. All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievance(s). Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other circulatory Complications and Long Term Use of Aspirin. A review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/17/2023 revealed she had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, indicating her cognition was intact. On 01/29/2024 at 9:19 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #56 in her room. The resident stated she washed her underclothes herself because sometimes when her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the status of 2 (#130 and #14) residents out of a total of 45 sampled residents by failing to ensure that: 1. Resident #130 was coded correctly for weight loss on discharge assessment. 2. Resident #14 was coded correctly for discharge on discharge assessment. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #130's electronic health record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Morbid Obesity, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb, Anxiety Disorder and Edema, Unspecified. Review of Resident #130's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/29/2023 Section A - Identification Information, A2105 Discharge Status was coded as 04 indicating she was discharged to Short-Term General Hospital. Further review of Resident #130's electronic health records nurses notes dated 11/29/2023 at 15:35 (3:35 p.m.) read in part, Resident dc'd (discharged ) home in stable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #129) of 2 (Resident #129 and Resident #183) investigated for activities of daily living out of a sample of 45. Findings: Review of Resident #129's electronic health record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Displaced Supracondylar Fracture without Intracondylar Extension of Lower End of Left Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routing Healing, Difficulty in Walking, and Contusion of the Left Hip. Review of Resident #129's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/09/2024 Section C - Cognitive Patterns C0500 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary revealed a score of 13 indicating she was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #129's MDS Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals, E. Shower/Bathe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day for 7 days per week. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 31) revealed a trigger for One Star Staffing Rating. Review of the Time Card Report for the PBJ time period Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 31) revealed the following: On 07/09/2023, S7ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) clocked in for 6.22 hours. On 07/29/2023, S7ADON clocked in for 7.93 hours. On 08/27/2023, S7ADON clocked in at 7:56 a.m. and clocked out at 4:25 p.m. total of 7.98 hours and S8RN clocked in at 7:52 a.m. and clocked out at 3:53 p.m. total of 7.52 hours. On 09/09/2023, S4MDS (Minimum Data Set) Registered Nurse clocked in for 2.21 hours. On 09/10/2023, S4MDS clocked in for 2.38 hours. On 09/23/2023, S7ADON clocked in for 5.95 hours. On 01/30/2024 at 4:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). S2DON stated that there must be 8 hour consecutive RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services provided to meet the needs of each resident were consistent with state and federal requirements and reflect current standards of practice for 1 (#2) of 3 residents (#1, #2, and #483) observed during medication pass. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 122. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Administering Oral Medications, read in part: Steps in the Procedure .7. Check the expiration date on the medication. Return any expired Medications to the pharmacy. On 01/30/2024 at 7:51 a.m., an observation was conducted of S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) during D1 medication pass on HallW. An observation of Resident #2's Metformin (Anti-diabetic medication) blister pack revealed an expiration date of 12/13/2023. Further review revealed it was sent by the pharmacy on 12/30/2023. There were two pills remaining out of the packet of 30 pills. S10LPN confirmed that the medication was expired and stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 (#1) out of 6 residents (#1, #24, #109, #110, #112 and #129) investigated for environment, by failing to ensure that the resident's wheelchair and wheelchair pad were cleaned. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who used a wheelchair. The Facility's census was 122. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/08/2023, revealed in section C that he had a BIMS (Basic Interview of Mental Status) of 15, indicating that his cognition was intact. Further review revealed in section GG that the resident used a wheelchair. On 01/29/2024 at 8:52 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #1 in his room. The resident's wheelchair was at his bedside. There was moderate dust…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update the facility wide assessment as evidenced by failing to: 1. Identify the resident population acuity levels, specifically ventilator dependent residents and residents requiring tracheostomy care 2. Include facility staff competencies regarding mechanical ventilator alarms 3. Include Respiratory Therapy Director or Respiratory Therapists as facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for the facility's resident population daily and during emergencies 4. Include how respiratory therapists were staffed on the mechanical ventilator and tracheostomy unit 5. Update the facility wide electronic medical record system to reflect the current system used This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 135 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Facility Assessment, read in part: A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for 3 (#1 #2, and #4) residents out of a total sample of 4 residents as evidenced by: 1. Failing to implement a tracheostomy/ventilator plan of care for residents #1 and #4 and 2. Failing to implement physician's orders to obtain vital signs for resident #2. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered read in part: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measureable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will .b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident # 1: Review of Resident # 1's record revealed he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents with a urinary catheter had a privacy bag or covering over their urinary catheter collection bag to promote dignity for 2 (#1 and #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Quality of Life - Dignity read in part . Policy Statement: Each resident shall be care for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .11. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: a. Helping the resident keep urinary catheter bags contained and private. Resident # 1: Review of Resident # 1's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Other Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's plan of care and clinical record accurately reflected their advanced directives for 1 (#4) out of 4 sampled residents (#1, #2, #3 and #4). Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Advance Directives revealed, in part, the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 10. The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Resident #4: Review of Resident #4's health record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, and Tracheostomy Status. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order dated [DATE] that read: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of Resident #4's care plan revealed a focus of Resident/Responsible Party (RP) has elected a DNR status with an intervention of to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1's EHR (Electronic Health Record) tracheostomy supplies were accurately documented for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1-#4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident # 1's record revealed he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Other Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Pneumonitis Due to Inhalation of Food and Vomit, Tracheostomy Status and Bed Confinement Status. Review of November 2023 physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/13/2023 RCU (Respiratory Care Unit): Change trach (tracheostomy) every month and prn (as needed) for airway maintenance #8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to provide bathing on 08/18/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/23/2023, 08/25/2023, 08/28/2023, and 08/29/2023 for 1 (#3) of 2 (#2 and 3) residents who were dependent on staff for bathing, out of 3 (#1-3) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Tracheostomy, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Cerebral Infarct, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Myocardial Infarction, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Pneumonia, Gastrostomy, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Parkinson's disease, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. A review of Resident #3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score was 09, indicating that he was moderately impaired for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require urostomy services, receive such care consistent with professional standards of practice as evidenced by the facility failing to assess a new Suprapubic catheter insertion site and failing to change the dressing to the Suprapubic catheter site from 08/21/2023 until the resident was discharged on 08/31/2023, for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1-3) sampled residents, out of a census of 135. Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Cerebral Infarct, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. A review of the facility's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed that he was incontinent of his bladder, and had a Foley catheter in place upon admission. A review of Resident #3's Physician Telephone Orders revealed on order dated 08/18/2023 for: Suprapubic cath insertion on 08/21/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpine Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationRuston, LA 1 of 5Bridgeport Medical LodgeBridgeport, TX 1 of 5Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationBossier City, LA 1 of 5Hilltop Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationBossier City, LA 1 of 5Shreveport Manor Skilled Nursing & RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5St Joseph Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationMonroe, LA 1 of 5The Bradford Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5The Guest House Skilled Nursing and RehabilitationShreveport, LA 2 of 5Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and RehabilitShreveport, LA 2 of 5Decatur Medical LodgeDecatur, TX 2 of 5Resthaven Living CenterBogalusa, LA 2 of 5Ridgmar Medical LodgeFort Worth, TX 3 of 5Broadmoor Medical LodgeRockwall, TX 3 of 5Camelot Of BroussardBroussard, LA 3 of 5Chateau St. James Rehab And RetirementLutcher, LA 3 of 5Louisiana Extended Care Hospital Of LafayetteLafayette, LA 3 of 5Mabank Nursing CenterMabank, TX 3 of 5Royse City Medical LodgeRoyse City, TX 3 of 5The Homestead of DenisonDenison, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Healthcare CenterLeesville, LA 3 of 5Timber Springs Rehab and RetirementSpringhill, LA 4 of 5Belterra Health & RehabMcKinney, TX 4 of 5College Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWeatherford, TX 4 of 5Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent CenterNew Orleans, LA 4 of 5Mansfield Medical LodgeMansfield, TX 4 of 5The Parks at Garland Healthcare and RehabGarland, TX 4 of 5Victoria Gardens Of AllenAllen, TX 4 of 5Victoria Gardens of FriscoFrisco, TX 4 of 5Vista Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 4 of 5Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care CenterLubbock, TX 5 of 5Camelot BrooksideJennings, LA 5 of 5Chateau D'Ville Rehab and RetirementDonaldsonville, LA 5 of 5Chateau Terrebonne Health Care CenterHouma, LA 5 of 5Grapevine Medical LodgeGrapevine, TX 5 of 5Spring Lake Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationShreveport, LA 5 of 5Springtown Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterSpringtown, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAUDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 01/01/2022
BOULWARE ST JAMES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 01/01/2022
BOULWARE, STEVENIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BAUDER, KELLYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2022
BAUDER, MADISONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2022
BAUDER, PARKERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2022
BOULWARE, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2022
WALKER, KATIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2022
BAUDER, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
PROGRESSIVE REHAB SOLUTIONS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BOULWARE, DOUGLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025
GRUBB, TERRAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
JOHNSON, SEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025
REED, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.1M
Related-party expense35% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 15%Other / private 19%

This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$370per resident / day
operating cost
$11,243per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$363per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195573. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next