Vista Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.95 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 82.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 (who was ordered a pureed diet and was a known aspiration risk) was provided with adequate supervision during the lunch meal on 04/01/25. Resident #1 was sat at a table with another resident who offered her a cookie, which Resident #1 accepted and ate, which led to her coughing several times before finishing the cookie. Five staff were in the dining room but no one was supervising the resident at the time to ensure safety or noticed she was eating outside her modified diet texture. An IJ was identified on 04/01/25 at 4:55 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:57 PM. While the IJ was removed on 04/02/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for one of seven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from verbal abuse by CNA A. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse or neglect that could lead to serious harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: dysarthria (a motor speech disorder caused by nervous system damage that weakens, paralyzes, or reduces coordination of the muscles used for speech) and anarthria (the complete loss of the ability to produce articulate speech due to severe neuromuscular damage), cognitive communication deficit (an underlying disruption in thinking like poor memory, attention, or executive functioning impairs a person's ability to effectively speak, listen, read, or write), muscle weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for reporting according to the facility policy.The facility failed to follow the facility's policy to report allegation of abuse when Resident #5 made an outcry to the Psychologist regarding sexual abuse from her FM on 3/24/26.This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of abuse and lack of timely reporting of incidents.Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 10, which meant she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #5 had unclear speech, sometimes made herself understood and usually understood others. Resident #5 needed substantial/maximal assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #5 needed substantial assistance to roll left and right and to sit to lying.Record review of Resident #5's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to other officials (including the State Survey Agency where state law provided for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for abuse or neglect.The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) after they learned Resident #5 had made an allegation of sexual abuse against her FM on 3/24/26. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, allegations of abuse not being reported immediately, and could result in physical and psychological harm. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident.The facility failed to submit a completed investigation regarding the allegation sexual abuse of Resident #5 by her FM to the State Survey Agency.This failure placed residents at risk of further abuse and a lack of oversight by the State Survey Agency.Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included: Aphasia (a communication disorder resulting from damage to brain areas responsible for language) following Cerebral Infarction (stroke), Dysphagia (a language disorder characterized by partial impairment of comprehension or expression of spoken words) following Cerebral Infarction, Major Depressive Disorder (mental health condition characterized by a persistent, intense and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure stored canned goods had uncompromised seals and were free from dents.The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sink #2 of #2 garbage receptacle contained only paper towels.These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, cross contamination, and infection.findings included: During an observation of the #1 handwashing sink's garbage receptacle on 03/17/2026 at 11:15 a.m., the following was revealed: #1 of #2 handwashing sinks had garbage receptacles that contained items other than disposable paper towels, which included styrofoam cups, used gloves, and coffee grounds.During an observation of the dry storage room on 03/17/2026 at 11:48 a.m., the following was revealed:1 Lemon pie filling or topping 116 oz (7 lbs. 4 oz) dent on the top seal, delivery date written 12/29/2025, no expiration date.3x…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of four staff members (MA A, MA B and CNA C) and six of six residents (Resident #71, #89, #4, #13, #88 and #76) reviewed for infection control procedures. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA A performed hand hygiene after direct contact with Resident #71, while serving meals in the dining room. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between vital sign checks for Resident #89 and Resident #4. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA B disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between vital sign checks for Resident #13 and Resident #88. 4. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed their soiled gloves and performed hand hygiene during incontinent care on Residents #76. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #55, and Resident #71) reviewed for rights. The facility failed to ensure the staff in the main dining room served Resident #55, and Resident #71, at the same time the other residents were served the lunch meal. These failures could place residents at risk of feeling like their dignity was being invaded or the facility was not their home. Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/06/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included: Cancer (degeneration of tissue), dementia (forgetfulness), and malnutrition (low in weight and nutrition). Resident #55 had moderate cognitive impairment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 5%, based on 34 opportunities, which involved 1 of 7 residents (Residents #47) and one of two staff (MA A) observed during medication administration for medication error. 1. MA A failed to administer Resident #47's Miralax Oral powder 17grm (for constipation) with the appropriate amount of fluid. 2. MA A failed to confirm Resident #47's MiraLAX Oral powder 17grm (for constipation) was administered. MA A left the cup of medication with Resident # 47. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a decreased health status. Findings include: Record review of Resident #47'squaterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47had diagnosis which include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to provide Resident #71 with her regular ground foods (mechanically altered diet that was prescribed for individuals who have difficulty chewing or swallowing food) as designated on her meal ticket on 03/17/2026. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for poor food intake, weight loss, and not having their nutritional needs met.The findings include: Record review of Resident #71's admission MDS assessment, dated 01/16/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #71 had diagnoses which included: heart failure (weak heart muscle), malnutrition (poor weight and nutrition), dementia (forgetfulness), and hypertension (increased blood pressure). Resident #71 had severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the nurse call system was accessible for residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member of a centralized staff work area for seven of ten residents (Residents #1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #9) reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #9's rooms were in a position accessible to the residents on 10/07/25 on the 200, 300, and 400 halls. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 10/07/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,348 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,348 — penalty dated 2025-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $472K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX