Camelot Of Broussard
418 Albertson Parkway, Broussard, LA 70518 · For profit - Corporation · 148 certified beds · (337) 839-9005 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,207 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-28)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 37% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 17.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.9% | 17.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.2% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.1% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 76.3% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 14.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.69 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.06 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.5%CMS range 40.4–54.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.8–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.5–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.44 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 131.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the likelihood of foodborne illnesses to the 127 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 02/26/2024 at 8:45 a.m. when the following was observed in the facility's kitchen: 1.Equipment: a. The six-burner stove and deep fryer was observed with thick layer of debris and grease build-up on the top, front, inside, and sides. Plastic bubble wrap and debris was observed on the floor underneath the six-burner stove. The doors that enclosed the deep fryer noted on the outside was held together by rubber bands. The deep fryer's cooking oil collection area was observed to be full. A thick layer of oil and debris noted on the floor underneath the deep fryer. b. Build-up of grease and residue on the outside of all refrigerators and all walk-in coolers. c. Build-up of debris on the outside of all ice machines and brown substance noted on the inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of residents by failing to provide oversight in the kitchen after unsanitary findings were discovered by the Registered Dietitian on 1/11/2024 and 2/1/2024 and reported to the administrator. This lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 02/27/2024 at 4:01 p.m. when the kitchen was observed to have equipment; food storage, preparation practices; and dinnerware storage practices that were unsanitary and unsafe for meal distribution to residents. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/27/2024 at 4:01 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/28/2024 at 9:39 a.m., after it was verified through observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. This deficient practice had the potential to cause foodborne illness in 127 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to accurately code a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 (#115) out of 38 residents sampled.Findings:Review of Resident #115's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Review of Resident #115's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A review of section L - Oral/ Dental Status revealed none of the above were present. On 04/15/2026 at 8:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #115. Resident #115 was alert and oriented to place and time and able to converse clearly with the surveyor. Resident #115 stated that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (#115) out of 38 sampled residents as evidenced by failing to develop a plan of care for Resident #115's oral/dental health.Findings:A review of Resident #115's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition.A review of Resident #115's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #115's care plan revealed no focus area related to Dentures, dental/oral care.On 04/15/2026 at 8:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14LPN. S14LPN reviewed resident #115's care plan and confirmed he was not care planned for Dentures, dental/ oral care. On 04/15/2026 at 10:25 a.m., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was accurately updated to reflect the discontinuation of an anticoagulant, a blood thinner medication, for 1 (#114) out of 38 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #114's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses included heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and thrombosis. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed Eliquis (blood thinner) was ordered on 06/24/2025 and discontinued on 08/21/2025. Review of the resident's current care plan revealed that anticoagulant remained on the resident's care plan and Eliquis was discontinued on 08/21/2025. On 04/14/2026 at 2:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10MDS and S11MDS. Both reviewed the resident's physician's orders and confirmed Resident #114's Eliquis was discontinued on 08/21/2025. Both reviewed the resident's care plan and confirmed that anticoagulants remained on the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided services that meet professional standards, as evidenced by nursing staff:Failing to document administration of a PRN (as needed) medication and the resident response to the medication for Resident #76; andLeaving medications at the bedside of Resident #120 who was not approved to self-administer medications. Findings: 1. On 04/15/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Medication Administration with a last reviewed date of 01/21/2026, read in part: Policy Statement: The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. A nurse or Certified Medication Aide (where applicable) shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). 2. Administration of medication must be documented after .it is given. 3. Documentation must include,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedures review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance, received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#76) of 38 sampled residents.Findings:On 04/15/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting with a last reviewed date of 01/21/2026, read in part: Policy Statement .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care).Review of Resident #76's records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered for 1 (#34) of 38 residents sampled.Findings:Review of Resident #34's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, which indicated resident #34 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #34's MDS section O was coded as oxygen therapy, non-invasive mechanical ventilator, and respiratory therapy. Review of Resident #34's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, insomnia, anxiety disorder, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Review of Resident #34's April 2026 physician's orders revealed an order for Oxygen: CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) 5/2L (Liters) at bedtime related to heart failure, with an order date of 06/27/2025. Review of Resident #34's MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed Oxygen: CPAP 5/2L at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety by failing to wear appropriate hair restraints. The facility had a census of 125 residents.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, with a last review date of 01/21/2026, read in part.Policy Statement: Food Service employees shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Policy Interpretation and Implementation.12. Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens.On 04/13/2026 at 8:42 a.m., initial tour of kitchen was conducted with S1DM. Throughout the tour, S1DM was observed with his facial hair exposed and was not wearing a beard restraint.On 04/13/2026 at 9:13 a.m., at conclusion of initial tour, S1DM confirmed that his facial hair should be covered and was not.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to ensure:1. Clean, laundered mop heads and blankets were stored away from soiled linens; and2. Resident #81's urinary catheter drainage bag avoided contact with the floor. The facility had a census of 125 residents.Findings:1.Review of a facility policy titled Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, with a last reviewed date of 01/21/2026, revealed in part, 1. Clean linen is stored separately, away from soiled linens, at all times.3. Clean linen is kept separate from contaminated linen. The use of separate rooms, closets, or other designated spaces with a closing door are used to reduce the risk of accidental contamination.On 04/14/2026 at 2:58 p.m., an observation was made of the soiled linen room of the laundry department with S3HLS. There were 3 covered plastic bins stored on the soiled side of the laundry room. S3HLS stated two of the bins contained clean mop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failing to: 1. perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration; and 2. wear appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) to care for Resident #13 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility's census was 121 residents. Findings: 1. On 03/10/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with a last reviewed date of 12/27/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents and visitors .7. Use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety by failing to wear appropriate hair restraints. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 124 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. A review of the facility's policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices with a last review date of 12/27/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Food Service employees shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .12. Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens. On 03/09/25 at 09:30 AM, an observation was made in the kitchen of S1DM (Dietary Manager) not wearing a beard restraint, with facial hair exposed. On 03/09/25 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made in the kitchen of S2MD (Maintenance Director). S2MD was observed wearing a hair net on the top of his head, but with a large amount of hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident were cared for in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced his or her dignity by placing a sign outside the residents door visible to the public indicating she required feeding assistance for 1 (Resident #14) out of 39 sampled residents, This failure could have caused decreased feeling of self-worth, feelings of embarrassment and a diminished quality of life. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Quality of Life- Dignity, with a reviewed date of 12/27/2024 revealed: read in part, Policy statement, each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality 9. Staff shall maintain an environment in which confidential clinical information is protected, for example .b. signs indicating the resident's clinical status or care needs shall not be openly posted . Review of Resident #14's medical records revealed an admit date of 02/05/2010 with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure rounding was conducted every two hours for 1 (#99) resident out of a final sample of 39 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, anxiety, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #99's plan of care initiated on 11/15/2023 revealed the resident was moderate risk for falls related to psychoactive drug use. Further review of the resident's plan of care revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to Alzheimer's, Dementia. On 03/09/2025 at 12:48 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #99's RP (Responsible Party) who stated the staff were not rounding on the resident as they should. She further stated that the resident had a fall on 01/30/2025 and was not rounded on for six hours. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality as evidenced by S2LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) borrowing medication from one resident to give to 1 (Resident #1) out 3 (Resident #1-3) sampled resident investigated during a complaint survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 127 residents in the nursing home. Findings: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included in part, Generalized Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Weakness, Essential Hypertension and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. He expired on [DATE]. Review of the Resident #1's [DATE] MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed an order dated [DATE] for Zofran (nausea medication) 4mg (milligram) by mouth three times a day for nausea until [DATE]. The start date was [DATE]. Review of a list of medications available in the facility's medication pyxis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assure the accurate administering of a medication for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 (Resident #1-3) sampled residents investigated during a complaint survey. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the 127 resident in the nursing home. Findings: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included in part, Generalized Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Weakness, Essential Hypertension and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. He expired on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Documentation of Medication Administration policy with a revision date of [DATE] read the following in part .The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medication administered. A Nurse .shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). Administration of medication must be documented after (never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#2 and #3) sampled residents. S2LPN failed to accurately document on the EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) and/or nurse's notes the administration of a medication. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 127 residents in the nursing home. Findings: On 12/10/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Medication Administration with a last revision date of April 2007, read in part, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: A Nurse or Certified Medication Aide (where applicable) shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's EMAR (electronic medication administration record). The policy also indicated that the following information is to be documented in the resident's medical record: Name and strength of the drug, dosage, method of administration,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse. The facility failed to protect: 1. Resident #2 from verbal abuse and mental abuse by S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), and 2. Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #3. Findings: On 11/06/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol with a last reviewed date of 12/27/2023, read in part, . Policy Statement: The facility will ensure that each resident had the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Policy interpretation and Implementation: . Staff to Resident Abuse of any Types: . The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident . Staff are expected to be in control of their behavior and behave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided privacy during personal care for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings: On 11/06/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity with a last reviewed date of 12/27/2023, read in part, . Policy Statement: Each resident shall be care for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 10. Staff shall promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care . Review of Resident #2's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Disease of Basal Ganglia, Muscle Weakness, Parkinson's Disease, and Tremor. Review of Resident #2's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, and review of facility's manual the facility failed to report to the administrator of the facility an event involving verbal abuse for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled resident reviewed for reporting alleged violations. Findings: On 11/06/2024, a review of the facility's manual titled, Abuse Neglect Reporting with a last revision date of 09/01/2016, read in part, Verbal Abuse - the use of oral, written or gesture language that willfully include disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . regardless of their age, ability to comprehend . Mental Abuse - this includes but is not limited to humiliation, harassment, and threats of punishment or deprivation . additional definitions: mistreatment: means to inappropriately treat or exploit a resident.In the event of any evidence involving mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, or other crime, including injuries of an unknown source, and an occurrence will be reported to the administrator of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was immediatley reported for 2 (#1, #2) residents out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents as evidenced by: 1. S8VD/CNA (Van Driver/Certified Nursing Assistant) failing to report complaints of pain for Resident #1 and; 2. S6RN (Registered Nurse) failing to notify Resident #2's responsible party (RP) and physician of a significant change in Resident #2's physical condition. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, with a last reviewed date of 12/27/2023, read in part .Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician Nurse Practitioner and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician, Nurse Practitioner, or physician on call when there has been a(n): d. significant change in the resident's physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and/or physician's orders for 2 (#1 and #3) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled resident as evidence by failing to: 1. implement a physician's order to monitor for changes post incident for Resident #1; and 2. develop appropriate interventions to prevent future falls from occurring for Resident #3. Findings: On 10/08/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes with a last reviewed date of 12/27/2023, read in part, Documentation: When a resident fall, the following information should be recorded in the resident's (electronic medical record): . 6. Appropriate interventions taken to prevent future falls . Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Alzheimer 's Disease, Pain, and Dorsalgia. Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to effectively monitor a resident's intake and output, consistent with the resident's assessed needs and goals, to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration status for 1 resident (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, Overactive Bladder, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Acute Cystitis without Hematuria. Review of Section H of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder. Review of Resident #2's progress notes revealed a visit note written by S11NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 09/16/2024 that read in part: .labs obtained today, labs are reviewed and does show acute elevation of creatinine at 5 (Reference range 0.7 to 1.4 ) .Plan: .Acute kidney injury: Will transfer to ER for evaluation . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the provider failed to post in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors, the daily nurse staffing data which reflect the current daily totals of the number of hours worked by the nursing staff. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 129. Findings: On 02/27/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S16HR (Human Resources). S16HR revealed she is responsible for posting the daily nursing hours. At that time, an observation was made with S16HR that revealed the posting on the wall with the facility's nursing staffing hours. Further review of this document with S16HR confirmed that the data on the form was for 2/24/2024 was not current.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of Resident #34's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 02/26/2024 at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #34's room. A urinal with 400 ml (milliliter) of dark amber urine was observed standing upright on bedside table. A dark brown ring was observed around the top of the urinal with yellow and brown debris observed in and around the bottom portion of the urinal. On 02/26/2024 at 11:10 a.m., an interview and room observation was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). S3ADON confirmed the urinal was on the bedside table, with a dark brown ring around top of urinal, with yellow and brown debris in and around the bottom portion of the urinal. S3ADON stated the urinal should have been discarded and replaced with a new urinal. On 02/26/2024 at 11:34 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #103's room. The wall next to the resident's window and bed had chipped paint and 3 holes exposing the sheetrock. On 02/27/2024 at 8:52 a.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary physical restraint for 2 (Resident #61 and #86) of 2 (Resident #61 and #86) sampled resident reviewed for restraints. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Use of Restraints, revealed in part, the following: Policy Statement: Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never fore discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls . Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement of restricts normal access to one's body . 3. Examples of devices that are//may be considered physical restraints include leg restraints, arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties or vest, wheelchair safety bars, geri-chairs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents identified with Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability had an accurately completed PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level I and/or Level II for 2 (#16, #45) of 4 (#8, #16,#45,#83) residents reviewed for PASARR screening. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring revealed, in part: .1. As part of the initial assessment, the nursing staff and Attending Physician will identify individuals with a history of impaired cognition, altered behavior .or mental disorder. a. All residents will receive a Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screen prior to admission. b. If the level I screen indicated that the individual may meet the criteria for a mental disorder, intellectual disability or related condition he or she will be referred to the state PASARR representative for the Level II (evaluation and determination) screening process .5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 3 (#6, #33, # 45) residents out of 3 (#6, #33, #45) sampled residents reviewed by: 1. Failing to follow physician's orders for using SASH (Saline, Administer, Saline, Heparin) after disconnecting a medication infusion from Resident #6's intravenous catheter; 2. Failing to implement an intervention of nebulizer treatment for Resident #33 with a diagnosis of Shortness of Breath; and 3. Failing to develop a care plan for impaired vision for Resident #45. Findings: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute Cystitis without Hematuria. Review of the resident's physician orders dated 02/22/2024 revealed the following order: - Flush Peripheral Intravenous (IV) per SASH (Saline, Administer, Saline, and Heparin) protocol, administer medication, follow up and disconnect when medication infusion is complete then provide post administration flush per SASH…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment for 5 residents (#25, #33, #83, #101, and #104) out of 5 residents (#25, #33, #83, #101, and #104) investigated for respiratory care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection read in part, Steps in the Procedure, Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration: 8. Keep the oxygen cannulae and tubing used PRN in a plastic bag when not in use. Infection Control Considerations Related to Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol: 7. Store circuit in plastic bag, marked with date and resident's name, between uses. Findings: Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's electronic health record revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Shortness of Breath and Acute on Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of Resident #25's Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for 2 (#10 and #29) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. A total of 28 opportunities were observed with 5 medication errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 17.86%. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #10's Ferrous Sulfate and Azelastine HCL (Hydrogen Chloride) Nasal Solution .1% was administered per physician orders. 2. Resident #29's Potassium, Protonix, and Guaifenesin were not administered per manufacturer's recommendations. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications revealed the following, in part: . 3. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's current physician's orders revealed the following, in part: Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg (milligrams) PO (by mouth), every day. Azelastine HCL Nasal Solution .1%. 1 spray in both nostril two times a day. Resident #29 Review of Resident #29's current physician's orders revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. The facility failed to provide nail care to dependent residents for 1 (Resident #49) out of 1 (Resident #49) resident sampled for ADLs. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, revealed in part, the following: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections . General Guidelines 1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. 2. Proper nail can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed . 4. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. Resident #49 Review of Resident #49's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Weakness, Other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to identify and provide resident centered care and services according to the resident's preferences to self-administer medications in order to attain the highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice was evidenced when facility staff failed to assess and initiate a care plan for Resident #119 to self-administer medications out of a finalized sample of 39 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #119's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #119's February 2024 eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed the medication Diclofenac Sodium External Gel 1% to be applied to affected area topically (a body surface including the skin) every 12 hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident #119's electronic health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's enteral feeding was properly labeled for 2 (#34, #474) residents out of 2 (#34, #474) sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump under the heading of Initiate Feeding read, in part .5. On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered . Review of Resident #34's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Muscle wasting and atrophy, Mild protein-calorie malnutrition, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Dysphagia and Encounter for attention to Gastrostomy. Review of Resident #34's February 2024 physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/01/2023 that read in part .Change feeding administration set daily, label the formula container, syringe and administration set with resident's name, date, time and nurse's initial. On 02/26/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to accurately obtain pharmaceutical services, including supplying routine medications with the appropriate strength as ordered by the physician, for 1 (#10) of 5 residents observed during medication administration pass. Findings: Review of Resident #10's February 2024 eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed the medication Cranberry oral capsule to be administered as followed: Give 200 mg (milligrams) by mouth two times a day. Further review of the resident's February 2024 eMAR revealed S18LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered 200 mg Cranberry oral capsule on 02/28/2024 for the morning dose. On 02/28/2024 at 11:27 a.m., an interview was conducted with S18LPN. S18LPN confirmed he administered Resident #10's ordered morning medications, which included 200 mg Cranberry oral capsule. Review of Cart A was conducted with S18LPN who confirmed there was no 200 mg Cranberry oral capsules available in the medication cart. Cart A revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were re-evaluated for the continued use of PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medications after 14 days for 2 (#44, #51) residents out of a final sample of 39 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use read in part .The Attending Physician and/or Nurse Practitioner will identify, evaluate, with input from other disciplines and consults as needed, symptoms, that may warrant the use of antipsychotic medication.The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rational for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. PRN orders for antipsychotic medications will not be renewed beyond 14 days unless the healthcare practitioner has evaluated the resident for appropriateness of that medication. Review of Resident #44's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store drugs as evidenced by loose pills found in the bottom of medication cart drawers for 1 (Cart A) of 3 medication carts reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner .3. Nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 02/27/2024 at 3:00 p.m., Cart A was observed with S17LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). Thirteen and one half pills were observed underneath resident medication blister packs. These pills included the following: one large oblong tablet, seven white round tablets, two square peach tablets, one round pink tablet, one half white oblong tablet, one yellow oval tablet, and one white oval tablet. S17LPN confirmed that loose pills should not have been in the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet individual needs for residents who received pureed diets. Findings: On 02/28/2024 at 9:20 a.m., an observation was made of S5DM (Dietary Manager) puree vegetable medley for the 4 residents who received pureed diets. The vegetable medley contained green beans, corn, and carrots. S5DM poured the vegetable medley into the food processor and began to puree the vegetables. S5DM proceeded to add 3 more scoops of vegetable medley to the food processor. He then added thickener to a 1 and ¼ cup measuring cup. S5DM stated that he was not adding all of the thickener to the pureed vegetables and proceeded to add a portion of the thickener to the pureed vegetables. S5DM stated that he usually eyeballed the amount of thickener added to dishes and he was not sure of how much thickener he added. S5DM proceeded to puree the vegetable medley. Upon completion, an observation was made of the pureed vegetable medley. The medley had small clumps and was not smooth. Small seeds from the green beans were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced when S17LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to perform hand hygiene according to accepted standards of practice before, during, and after medication administration for 3 (# 10, # 29 and # 523) of 5 residents observed during medication pass. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revealed in part .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene .3. Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub .for the following situations: .b. Before and after direct contact with residents; c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse notified the RP (Responsible Party) that resident #2 had a fall for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #2. Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Assessing Falls and Their Causes revealed, .Defining Details of Falls: 2. For each individual, distinguish falls in the following categories: a. Rolling, sliding, or dropping from an object (e.g., from bed or chair to floor) .Documentation: When a resident fall, the following information should be recorded in the resident's (electronic medical record): 4. Notification of the physician and family . Review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with Degenerative Disease of Basal Ganglia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Parkinson's Disease. Review of the resident's nursing progress note dated 10/22/2023 at 3:55 p.m. revealed, This nurse made aware of resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 (#3) of 5 (#1- #5) sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by S5CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) slamming the room door of Resident #3, after he requested she assist him in getting out of bed. Findings: Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] read in part Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan dated 07/20/2022 read in part .at risk for falls with an intervention for one staff member to assist for all ambulation. Review of Physician Orders dated 07/01/2022 - activity as tolerated. On 08/15/2023 at 9:54 a.m., an interview was conducted with the resident, who stated that he has been in the bed for days and that S5CNA kept making excuses as to why she couldn't help him with getting out of bed. At this time, S5CNA entered the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the provider failed to ensure staff provided assistance with transfers, and ambulation for 1 (#3) of 5 (#1- #5) sampled residents. Finding: Review of Resident #3's electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #3's functional status was assessed as 3 meaning he required extensive two person assistance with transfers. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan, dated 7/20/2022, read in part, Risk for falls due to Hemiparesis and limited mobility (uses a wheelchair for long distances) with interventions in part to remind resident to ask staff for assistance with ambulation and requires one staff member assistance for all ambulation. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competencies to provide care, assure residents' safety, and maintain the residents' highest practicable physical well-being. The facility failed to ensure S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) completed rounds every two hours for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1-#5) residents sampled. Findings: Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admit date of 02/06/2023 and diagnoses including Displaced Comminuted fracture of shaft of humerus, left arm , Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, Muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/28/2023 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's incident logs revealed Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 04/27/2023 approximately 4:00 a.m. The report was written by S7 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), which read in part .resident noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,207 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $21,207 — penalty dated 2024-02-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAUDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 01/01/2022 |
| BOULWARE ST JAMES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 01/01/2022 |
| BOULWARE, STEVEN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| BAUDER, KELLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2022 |
| BAUDER, MADISON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2022 |
| BAUDER, PARKER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2022 |
| BOULWARE, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2022 |
| WALKER, KATIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2022 |
| BAUDER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| PRIORITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| PROGRESSIVE REHAB SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| BLANCO, LUISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| BOULWARE, DOUGLAS | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| RICHARDSON, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| SHANMUGANATHAN, SUSILA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 37% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195592. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.