Mabank Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 76.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that was, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. 1. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #1's change in condition including head leaning heavily to the left, heavy incontinence, confusion, weakness, and need for 2-person assist on 7/15/24. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #1's respiratory distress on 7/20/24 at 10:47 a.m. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 7/15/24 and ended on 7/26/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could result in residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1.The facility failed to recognize Resident #1's head leaning heavily to the left, heavy incontinence, confusion, weakness, and need for 2-person assist on 07/15/24 as a change of condition. 2. The facility failed to ensure fluid intake was encouraged or increased for Resident #1 after receiving lab results on 7/18/24 which indicated Resident #1 was positive for a UTI. 3. The facility failed to follow-up for 2 days regarding Resident #1's lab results which were positive for UTI. 4. The facility failed to ensure RN A provided oxygen therapy to Resident #1 when she was in respiratory distress. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 7/15/24 and ended on 7/26/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 6 of 6 residents (Resident's #30, # 70, #81, #40, #58, and #6) reviewed for accidents.1.The facility failed to ensure CNA E and CNA B locked the mechanical lift during a transfer for Resident #30 on 05/19/26.2. The facility failed to ensure the mechanical lift was locked when transferring Resident #70.3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #81 had bilateral landing mats when in bed. 4.The facility did not ensure Alcohol Wipes was not stored in Residents #40 and #58's bathroom.5.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not have bath wash left out in the bathroom sitting on the toilet. These failures could place residents at risk of injury or harm. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 05/21/26, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable for 4 of 22 residents (Resident #6, Resident #38, Resident #8, and Resident #90) and 2 of 10 medication carts (Hall 500 hall nurse's medication cart and the hall 400 nurse medication cart) observed for medication storage.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not have zinc oxide wound care cream in her bathroom left in the caddy by the sink.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's Novolog (fast-acting insulin to control high blood sugar) insulin was dated when opened on Hall 400's nurse's medication cart.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's Lantus (Long-acting insulin that regulates blood sugar levels at a stable rate throughout the day) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0849 — pattern
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #44,Resident #75 and Resident #87) reviewed for hospice services.1.The facility failed to maintain Resident #44's hospice binder containing information related to hospice services provided for the resident such as the Physician certification of the terminal illness, the last two IDG also known as Interdisciplinary Group meetings (a regular, collaborative team review of a patient's care meetings),or updated recertification form.2.The facility failed to obtain Resident #75's most current Interdisciplinary Group Meeting. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's hospice binder included the updated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 22 residents (Resident #52, Resident #4, Resident #87, Resident #91, Resident #12, Resident #82, and Resident #44) rooms reviewed for infection control practices and enhanced barrier precautions.1. The facility failed to ensure LVN F used the proper PPE while administering gastrostomy tube medications and feeding for Resident #52 on 05/20/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, Resident #87, Resident #91, and Resident #12 had their toothbrushes stored and labeled in the bathrooms to distinguish from one another. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA E wiped correctly and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care for Resident #82 on 05/18/26.4. The facility did not ensure CNA E performed hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #75) for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure MA L did not call Resident #75 a feeder while assisting her to eat on 05/18/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased self-worth, loss of dignity, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/20/2026 indicated Resident #75 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain (condition that causes decrease function of the brain) and a secondary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (extreme sadness). Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #75 usually makes self-understood and only sometimes understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #75 had a BIMS score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #61) reviewed for reasonable accommodation.The facility failed to ensure Resident #61's call button was within reach while Resident #61 was in his bed on 05/18/26 and 05/19/26.This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in assistance and dignity.Findings included:Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 05/21/26, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia ( loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), type 2 diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar), depression (low mood), and high blood pressure.Record review of Resident #61's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/20/26, indicated Resident #61 understood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to formulate an advanced directive was provided for 2 of 22 residents (Residents #40 and #64) reviewed for advanced directives. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's OOH-DNR included the legal guardian's signature, printed name, and date the document was signed. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's OOH-DNR included the date the document was signed by the two witnesses. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #64s OOH-DNR included the physician's signature. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their end-of-life wishes honored. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Angelman syndrome (neuro-genetic disorder that impairs nervous system development). Record review of Resident #40's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, 2 of 7 (Residents #56 and #49) reviewed for abuse.The facility did not ensure the Abuse Coordinator implemented their policy on reporting abuse to state agency for a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 12/05/25 between Resident #56 and Resident #49. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and a decreased quality of life. Findings includedRecord review of the facility policy for Abuse Prohibition Policy, revised 10/15/22 reflected, Policy Statement All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Policy Interpretation and Implementation :4.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 2 of 7 (Residents #56 and #49) residents reviewed for reporting abuse.The facility did not report the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #56 and Resident #49 to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours of being notified on 12/05/25. This failure to report could place the residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:1.Record review of Resident #56's face sheet, dated 05/21/26, reflected Resident #56 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included dementia (forgetfulness) , anxiety, (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms ), depression (sadness), and high blood sugars.Record review of Resident #56's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/20/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were coordinated with Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program under Medicated in subpart C to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort and coordination included incorporating the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for PASRR.The facility did not ensure the correct PASRR (a preliminary assessment completed for all individuals before admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to determine whether they might have a mental illness or intellectual disability) Level 1 Screening was submitted to the local authority for Resident #5 who had a diagnosis of mental illness upon admission. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,234 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX