The Woodlands Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 136.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 (#R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R7) of 10 Sampled Residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident's received proper assistance for elimination and bed mobility.Findings:Review of the facility policy on 03/16/2026 at 1:22 p.m. titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting and dated 03/2018 read in part. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: 1. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); 2. Mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure residents received services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 2 (#R1 and #R6) of 10 Sampled Residents.Findings: #R1 Observation on 03/12/2026 at 4:29 a.m. of Resident # R1, in her room revealed a strong BM odor upon entrance. S6CNA revealed the 2 Y Hall CNAs had just changed Resident #R1. Observation with S6CNA revealed a large amount of smeared BM throughout the resident's bed linen. S6CNA revealed the 2 Y Hall CNAs should have changed Resident #R1's bed linen when they changed the brief during toileting care, but had not. #R6Observation on 03/12/2026 at 4:54 a.m. of Resident #R6, in her room revealed a strong urine and BM odor and uncontained soiled clothing near the door area of the room and pants on the floor with BM present. Resident #R6 revealed staff had not been by to check on her, and she was up and going to get coffee. Interview on 03/12/2026 at 5:03 a.m. with S10LPN confirmed residents who require…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a situation as an alleged violation involving abuse, and immediately report the alleged violation involving abuse to the administrator of the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 10 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 03/16/2026 at 1:22 p.m. titled Abuse and Neglect- Clinical Protocol dated 10/15/2022 read in part.Altercations between residents should be reviewed as a potential situation of abuse. Both residents having a mental disorder or cognitive impairment does not automatically preclude a resident from engaging in deliberate or non-accidental actions. It is important to remember that abuse included the term willful which means that the individual's action was deliberate (not inadvertent or accidental), regardless of whether the individual intended to inflict injury or harm. Example of a deliberate (willful) action would be a cognitively impaired resident who strikes out at a resident within his/her reach, as opposed to a resident with a neurological disease who has involuntary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her own quality of life for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #27) of 39 sampled residents. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #2 received incontinence care before meal service, and2. Ensure Resident #27 received her meal along with the other residents at the lunch table. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled “Assistance with Meals” on 09/04/2025 at 10:48 a.m. revealed in part… facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating for dining room residents and residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity. Resident #27 Record review revealed an admission date of 03/06/2025 with admitting diagnosis of Unspecified Protein –calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, other lack of coordination, unspecified dementia moderate without behavioral disturbance, psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: [NAME], RUBY (7) Ford, [NAME] - Advance Directives No NotesBRITT, RUBY (7) Ford, [NAME] - RESIDENT NOTE [DATE] 1:42 PM Record Review: Res admitted on [DATE] and re-entered on [DATE], DOB [DATE], 93yo, W/F, DNR with selective treatment code status, DX: Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage without Loss of Consciousness, subsequent encounterDX in part:Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Unspecified, Unspecified Dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; Cognitive Communication DeficitMDS:Annual MDS with ARD date of [DATE] revealed in part.Section C: BIMS 99, indicating severe impaired cognitionSection E: No behaviorsSection GG: Eating-setup or clean-up assistance; oral hygiene-dependent; toileting hygiene-dependent; shower/bathe self-dependent; upper body assistance-substantial/maximal assistance; lower body assistance-dependent; putting on/taking off footwear-dependent; personal hygiene-supervision or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #9) of 39 sampled residents. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/16/2023 with diagnoses including Dysphagia, Cerebral Infarction, and Unspecified Convulsions.Review of Resident #9's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 08/13/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9 experienced coughing or choking during meals or when taking medications. Review of Resident #9's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part. 08/08/2025 May perform oral suctioning.Review of Resident #9's Care Plan revealed Resident #9 was not care planned for suctioning.Interview with S2DON on 09/04/2025 at 2:00 p.m. confirmed Resident #9 should have been care planned for suctioning, but was not.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care had been revised for 1 (Resident #7) of 39 resident care plans reviewed. Findings: Review of facility's Advance Directives policy on 09/03/2025 at 2:38 p.m. revealed the following in part.The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Resident #7Record review revealed an admission date of 06/21/2021 and re-entered on 12/14/20222 with admitting diagnosis of Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage without Loss of Consciousness, subsequent encounter. Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/01/2025 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 99 which indicated Resident #7's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #7 Care Plan with initiate date of 06/20/2023 and next review date of 11/07/2025 revealed a problem of Resident #7 had elected a Full Code status with an intervention to inform all caregivers of full code status.Review of Resident #7 Physician Orders on 09/03/2025 at 1:42 p.m., revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all care and services were provided according to accepted professional standards of clinical practice. The facility failed to:1. Ensure proper physician orders were obtained for oxygen therapy requirements for 1 (Resident #100) of 2 (Resident #73 and Resident #100) residents reviewed for respiratory care; and 2. Ensure a wound dressing was properly labeled with the date/time of the treatment and initials of who performed the wound care for 1 (Resident #100) of 2 (Resident #63 and Resident #100) residents review for skin conditions. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 09/03/2025 at 3:17 p.m. titled, Oxygen Administration with a revision date of 02/2025 revealed the following in part .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration, and infection prevention associated with respiratory therapy goals. Preparation; 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Equipment and Supplies: 2. Nasal cannula, nasal catheter, mask (as ordered). Review of an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1(#73) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly labeled, and stored. Findings: Review of the Facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revision dated of 02/2025 read in part . the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration, and infection prevention, associated with respiratory therapy task. Steps in the procedure: 5. Store in a covered device (i.e. plastic bag, kangaroo pouch) between use. Review of Resident #73's 09/2025 Physician Orders read in part.08/26/2025: Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath and hypoxia. Observation on 09/02/2025 at 12:30 p.m. revealed Resident #73's nasal cannula lying on the floor, without a bag. Observation on 09/03/2025 at 10:26 a.m. revealed Resident #73's nasal cannula lying on the floor, without a bag. Resident #73 stated that he used the oxygen last night on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were utilized from 1 (Resident #102) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #76, and Resident #102) residents reviewed for infection control;2. Ensure proper hand hygiene and gloving was followed during meal service on Hall Z;3. Ensure staff followed proper infection prevention and control practices during wound care for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #103) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 09/03/2025 at 2:15 p.m. titled, “Implementation of Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions” dated 03/2024 revealed the following in part…Infection control measures are implemented in attempts to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. 3. Enhanced-Barrier Precautions (EBP):…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY MANAGEMENT — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA