No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Courtland, LLC

7920 Scotts Level Road, Baltimore, MD 21208 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (410) 521-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$20,251 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,251 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-24)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8136 Liberty Rd Unit C · (301) 536-0044 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
8050 Liberty Rd · (410) 496-2117 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3602 Milford Mill Rd · (410) 655-1384 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Gwynns Fall Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.7%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.2%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.6%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.3%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.8%25.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.8%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.621.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.491.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 197 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.9%CMS range 40.8–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.7–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.8–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.05
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 141.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
40
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-07-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe sanitary environment related to sewage water backup. This was found on 1 of 8 days of the survey.The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 3:25 PM on 7/15/25. The findings include:On 7/15/25 at 8:44 AM, at the entrance conference the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility was having a problem with a drainage pipe and that they were dealing with a sewage issue.On 7/15/25 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor observed the kitchen. A pooling of sewer water was noted over a circular drain in the floor. Four other square drains throughout the kitchen were filled with liquid, 3 were noted with a brown color with a foul odor. One of the drains had a bleach smell as if it had just been cleaned.On 7/15/25 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor interviewed the kitchen manager. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a Resident's Representative the right to be involved in the vaccination consent process. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #73) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. The findings include: On 7/24/25 at 9:02 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #73's medical record. The review revealed an evaluation titled, Physician's Certification of Incapacity to Make an Informed Decision completed by two providers dated 7/21/22 and 8/4/22. Both providers indicated the Resident #73 was unable to make a rational evaluation of the burdens, risks, and benefits of the treatment, or course of treatment. On further review it was noted that Resident #73's spouse was indicated on the Surrogate Identification Form. The surveyor reviewed the consent forms for the administration of the influenza (flu) vaccinations. In the 2022 flu season a telephone consent was obtained and documented by Resident #73's spouse. However, in the 2023 flu season, the consent form indicated the Resident had given consent and the form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with a reasonable accommodation of need. This was found evident during one random observation on the survey for Resident #77. The findings include: On 7/16/25 at 8:56 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident was laying in bed awake and noted that his/her food tray was on the over-the-bed table next to Resident #77's bed. Resident #77 stated that his/her bed stopped working yesterday evening and that he/she was unable to raise the head of the bed up to eat. Resident #77 stated the bed has been fixed before but occasionally stops working. Resident #77 stated that he/she was told to hold off on eating until he/she could be set upright to eat. On 7/16/25 at 8:08 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #77's Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #13. GNA #13 stated that she was aware the Resident #77's bed was not working and she informed her Unit Manager. She confirmed that she instructed the Resident to wait to eat because he/she needed to be upright for safety concerns. On 7/16/25 at 8:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of facility investigation, resident medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from abuse. This was true for 1 (Residents #2) of 16 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual re-certification survey. The findings include:Nursing Practice Act: 10.27.19.02:D. A nurse may not engage in sexual misconduct. Sexual misconduct includes but is not limited to: (3) Solicitation of a sexual relationship, whether consensual or nonconsensual, with a client.On 7/16/2025 at 8:15 AM the facility reported incident (FRI) was reviewed. Staff #37, GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) and Staff #38, RN (Registered Nurse) walked into the room on 10/6/2024 on evening shift and witnessed Staff#39, GNA touching Resident #2 in their vaginal area and kissing Resident #2's breast. Later the Administrator interviewed Staff #39, the GNA accused of the allegations. Staff #39, GNA stated that they cleaned Resident #2, and the Resident asked them to put barrier cream on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to acquire and document the appropriate consents and procedures prior to the implementation of a restraint. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 residents (R-165) reviewed for restraints. The findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #165 on 7/22/25 at 12:06 PM revealed this resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation post-acute hospital stay where a gastrostomy tube was placed secondary to the resident developing dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) after a stroke. An abdominal binder was placed on resident as well as a care plan was developed on 9/13/23. However, further record review revealed that the abdominal binder was placed on Resident #165 as early as 9/1/23.Further review of the consents form 'Physical restraint/Siderail consent Form' for the use of restraints revealed that consent for the use of the abdominal binder was not acquired from the family until 9/18/23. Additionally, according to the consent, the facility is to document what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an incident of abuse. This was evident for 1 (#176) resident reviewed for 1 of 16 reports of abuse.The findings include:A facility reported incident of resident-to-resident abuse was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 12:31 PM.The report revealed that on 3/12/23 at 11:00 PM Resident #176 assaulted Resident #175. The facility Executive Director (ED) reported the incident and investigated. The investigation consisted of interviews that the ED conducted with staff.Staff #29 the Housekeeping Supervisor indicated she overheard screaming from a resident's room. She went to the room and observed Resident #175 who was standing next to the bed, struck Resident 176, who was lying in the bed. She sent Resident #175 out of the room, 2 nurses came to the room, and she informed them of what she observed. They walked Resident #175 to his/her room down the hall. The 2 nurses were not identified by Staff #29. -There were no interviews/statements from Staff #22 the RN (Registered Nurse) who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to 1) notify the Ombudsman of resident's transfers, 2) provide the Resident and/or Representative with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer. This was found evident of 2 (Resident #10 & #141) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization 3. Failed to provide the resident/family/RP with discharge instructions. (#161) This was evident for 1 of 3 discharge records reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1a) On 7/16/25 at 9:29 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #10’s medical record. The review revealed that Resident #10 was sent to the hospital on 4/25/25 and returned to the facility on 5/2/25. On 7/21/25 at 1:18 PM, the surveyor requested documentation to demonstrate that the Ombudsman was made aware of the hospitalization. On 7/21/25 at 1:42 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Regional Clinical Director of Operations Staff #5. During the interview Staff #5 confirmed that during that time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop/revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan specifically including measurable objectives-ideal healthy weight and timeframes to meet residents' significant weigh change concern. This was evident for 1 (Resident #64) out of 132 residents reviewed for care plan development to meet medical and psychosocial needs during an annual survey.The findings include: During a rounding on 07/15/2025 at 9:45 AM, Resident #64 stated I like to lose some weight. Observed the resident was wearing oversize clothes and seemed too small. Interview, on 7/16/25 at 1:50 pm, Resident #64 revealed that she came back from an emergency room visit due to a mental melt-down episode; feeling depressed and wanted to kill herself. The resident stated that I felt bad and looked at me I can not do anything for myself but getting big.Record Review, on 07/18/2025 at 11:00 AM, of Resident #64's record indicated 8/23/2024 the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility's standard of oxygen care consistently. This was found evident of 1 out of (Resident #12) residents reviewed for respiratory care during an annual survey.Observation, on 07/15/2025 at 3:04 PM, Resident #12 was found on 2 liters of oxygen with nasal cannula in use and there was no label on the humidifier water bottle nor the oxygen nasal cannula tubing with a change date/time.Nasal cannula- a tubbing used to provide supplemental oxygen.Record review, on 07/16/2025 at 1:08 PM, of this resident's record indicated 1/18/25 the resident was admitted to this facility after a complicated hospitalization with diagnoses of new seizure disorder, heart attack, hypoxia, dysphagia and post medical diagnoses: intellectual disability, end of renal disease on hemodialysis MWF. The admission oxygen order was continuing oxygen 2-liter nasal canula and check every shift. Further review Futurecare Nursing Practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a complaint, medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the attending physician failed to review the full program of care at each visit, ensuring the medication ordered and documented in the progress notes were accurate. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (161) reviewed for physician services. The findings include:Review on 7/21/25 at 8:28 AM revealed that Resident #161 was initially admitted to the facility for rehabilitation post hospitalization and needed medication management. Resident #161 was admitted on Cellcept and Tacrolimus, they are immunosuppressant medications used in organ transplant recipients to prevent rejection. Secondary to abnormal labs, Resident #161 was sent to the hospital on 7/8/24. On 7/18/24, Resident #161 was re-admitted to the facility. However, the record review revealed that although Attending staff #20 wrote in his notes that Resident #161 was receiving the Tacrolimus on readmission, the medication was never reordered and therefore, Resident #161, did not receive the medication from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication without adequate monitoring. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:On 7/21/25 at 8 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #14's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #14 had three cardiovascular medications ordered in which administration instructions were based off of Resident #14's blood pressure and/or heart rate. The medication instructions were as follows:Amlodipine Besylate 10 mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension (high blood pressure), hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 110.Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER) 25 mg, give one tablet by mouth one time per day for chronic heart failure (CHF), hold for heart rate less than 60.Hydralazine HCL 25mg give one table by mouth two times a day for hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 63 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to track proper diet orders, to process the repeat insufficient proportion requests from residents and to honor residents' right to meet personal dietary proportion needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) out of 2 residents reviewed for food during an annual survey.The findings include:Observation, on 07/15/2025 at 1:30 PM, Resident #12 finished everything on the lunch tray and yelled, I'm hungry and they did not bring enough food, Geriatric Nursing Assistant Staff #34 in the hallway stated that she notified the kitchen for additional food which it has been on-going for a while.Observation, on 07/16/2025 at 8:30 AM, this resident's main dish consisted of 3 parts of thin watery pureed food on a plate. Overheard this resident yelling out later, I'm hungry and need food. Observed the breakfast tray meal was completely finished by this resident. Record review, on 07/16/2025 at 01:08 PM, of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0841 — isolated
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record, review of a complaint, and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility's Medical Director failed to ensure adequate implementation of resident care intervention and/or policy review. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #98) of 1 resident reviewed for insulin use. The findings include: On 7/16/25 at 12:32 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #98. During the interview Resident #98 described that when he/she was admitted to the facility he/she was prescribed a glucose monitoring device that was utilized to monitor blood glucose levels without the use of a finger stick. Resident #98 stated he/she was very happy with the use of the device but shortly after the device was ordered it was discontinued. On 7/23/25 at 11:35 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #98's medical record. The review revealed an order was placed for 3/27/24 for Resident 98 to have a continuous glucose monitoring device. On further review, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #42 documented, on 4/6/24 in a progress note, that the patient was seen for a follow-up. Patient and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records by:1) Failing to document the disposition of a discharged residents personal property. This was evident for 1 (#163) of 1 resident reviewed for Misappropriation of Property. 2) Failing to document resident behavior. This was evident for 1 (#176) resident reviewed for 1 of 16 abuse reports reviewed. The findings include:1) Resident #163's medical record was reviewed on 7/15/25 at 11:55 AM due to complaints which included but were not limited to an allegation that the resident's wheelchair was stolen and was replaced by the facility with a broken chair. The resident was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital in Maryland. According to the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], he/she had resided in a Long Term Care facility in another state prior to the hospitalization. During an interview on 7/16/25 at 12:20 PM Staff #10 the Rehabilitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain practices to help prevent the transmission of infections. This was found evident on 2 out of 3 observations of the laundry area. The findings include: On 7/15/25 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor observed the clean laundry room. The door to a linen closet was opened and linens were not covered. Additionally, two carts in the clean laundry room, in which the staff had just folded and placed laundry, were left uncovered and exposed to the sewer water on the floor. Staff #1 stated that all the linens would be re-washed and the room terminally cleaned after this was brought to his attention. On 7/18/25 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor again observed the door to a linen closet was opened and linens were not covered. The surveyor interviewed the Laundry Staff #40. Staff #40 stated that currently the clean laundry bin in the closet was prohibiting the door from closing but that she would be folding them next and after the bin was removed the the door would be closed. Next the surveyor went into the hallway where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to document the rationale for non-administration of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #66) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations during an annual survey. Influenza (flu) immunizations are usually offered during the flu season, which is considered October 1 through March 31 annually. The findings include: On 7/22/25 at 1:50 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #66's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #66 refused all vaccinations offered to him/her on 4/4/25. On Resident #66's influenza vaccination form it was documented that Resident #66 declined to have the influenza vaccination administered. Further on the form no rationale was given for the refusal even though the form asks for the reason to be indicated. The form was signed by the resident, indicating it was offered, and did not state that the refusal was due to the recently ending flu season. On further review the pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and reviews of facility documents and medical records, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure that the dishwasher hot water temperatures are frequently checked to ensure cleanliness and sanitation of dishware, and 2) store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and 3) ensure meals were provided in a manner that maintained safe quality control temperatures to meet the individual needs of dialysis residents. This was evident for 2 (Residents #51 and #111) of 17 residents reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey for food quality and kitchen practices. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that consumed food that was prepared by the kitchen. The findings include: 1) An initial environmental kitchen food services inspection was conducted on 1/23/23 at 8:15 AM. Dishwasher temperature logs were not found/observed in the dishwashing machine area or any other area in the kitchen. A male dietary worker (staff #28) was asked about the dishwashing temperature log, and he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program and facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease by;1) failing to screen tuberculosis (TB) for new admit residents, this was evident for 2 (Resident #125 and #142) of 5 residents TB screening reviewed; 2) failing to order contact precautions for a resident who diagnosis E. coli infection, this was evident for 1 (Resident #343) of 6 residents review for infection disease; 3) failing to follow infection control practices in residents' rooms, this was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and #205) of residents reviewed; 4) failing to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and 5) failed to implement measures to prevent contamination of resident care products for 1 (#65) of 8 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury. These practices had the potential to affect all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by 1) ensuring residents were treated with respect and dignity by labeling residents who required physical assistance with meals as feeders and this was evident for 11 residents listed on 2 of 3 posted staffing assignment boards in the facility, 2) identifying, labeling and posting the residents level of dependency on others on 1 of 3 nursing units in the facility, and 3) failing to have an effective process in place to assist the residents to obtain and wear personal clothing for 2 (#70 and #137) of 78 residents reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) A lunchtime meal test tray observation was conducted with the Food Service Director staff #20 in the 1st-floor unit on 2/3/23. A review of the unit staffing assignment board revealed the word feeders at the bottom left corner, with room numbers (indicating the residents requiring assistance with eating) listed across the row under each GNA assignment. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and initiate comprehensive, resident-centered care plans with measurable objectives and goals for residents residing in the facility. This was evident for 6 (#14, #30, #131, #52, #51, #35) of 78 residents reviewed during the LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Resident #131's care plans were reviewed on 2/10/23. A care plan problem initiated on 2/6/23 related to functional maintenance was reviewed. Two goals were written as resident will be able to make basic needs known with use of GoTalk device, and Resident will demonstrate effective use writing skills with use writing skills with use of white board to copy letters/simple words. The only intervention was written as communication 3 x a week for 53 weeks The one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and interviews with facility staff, the facility failed to update residents' care plans after each assessment and failed to consistently conduct quarterly care plan meetings. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #48, #131, #23, #35) of 78 residents reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes and non-critical access hospitals with Medicare swing bed agreements. The Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents (regardless of payer) of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. Each care plan provides a framework for guiding the review of trigger areas and clarifying a resident's functional status and related causes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure staff followed physician orders as evidenced by failing to apply Multi Podus boots and hand splints to a resident, and 2) to ensure ordered consults were addressed, 3) follow a consult physician's dressing change orders, 4) provide care for a resident who had shortness of breath, including failing to ensure the resident's x-ray was taken STAT (immediately) per the Physician's order, and 5) delay care regarding critical lab results. This was evident for 5 (Resident #53, #199, #297, #403, #405) of 78 residents reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. This noncompliance resulted in no actual harm to the residents, it has a potential for more than minimal harm if the practice is not corrected. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 12:00 PM, Resident # 53 was observed in room and not wearing hand splints and/or Multi podus boots. A follow-up observation was made on [DATE] at 12:26 PM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, reviews of medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) initiate nursing interventions to prevent further falls, and 2) implement measures to minimize the residents' risk of injury. This was evident for 2 (Residents #65, and #129) of 11 residents reviewed for accidents during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #65 was observed on 1/25/23 at 10:08 AM lying in his/her bed. His/her bed was in an elevated position approximately 3 feet above the floor, no fall mats were observed in the room. Another observation on 1/27/23 at 12:35 PM revealed the resident was again observed in his/her bed which was elevated approximately 3 feet above the floor. When asked at that time if he/she adjusted the height of the bed, the resident stated I don't do shit with it. Another observation was made on 1/30/23 when the surveyor entered Resident #65d room with Staff #52 the wound nurse and #53 a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of the medical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) conduct accurate ongoing assessments and oversight of the resident before and after dialysis treatments, and also failed to develop a resident-centered plan of care for a resident receiving dialysis. This was evident for 2 (Residents #51, and #297) of 5 residents reviewed for Dialysis during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Dialysis Communication Forms are utilized by the facility and dialysis center to assess and communicate the residents status before, during and after dialysis treatments. The facilities Dialysis Communication form consisted of 3 sections. The first section FN1, provided space for the facility nurse to document any communication to the dialysis nurse, and space to record the residents most recent vital signs and blood glucose with the date and time each were obtained. The second section DN provided space for the dialysis nurse to post dialysis vital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, administrative policy review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that appropriate alternatives are attempted prior to installation of side rails, assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails, obtain informed consent, and ensure bed rails were properly installed prior to the utilization of side rails for any resident. This was evident for 3 (Resident #30, #48, #131) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards during the annual survey. The findings included. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that prior to the installation or use of bed rails, the facility attempts to use alternatives. If the attempted alternatives were not adequate to meet the resident's needs, the resident is assessed for the use of bed rails, which includes a review of risks including entrapment; and informed consent is obtained from the resident or if applicable, the resident representative. The facility must ensure the bed is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the Physician failed to 1) review the resident's total plan of care as evidenced by the physician continuing to write orders related to a condition no longer existed, and 2) reconcile the correct dose, or the amount of the medication the resident received per day, of Depakote. This was evident for 2 (Resident's #35, #49) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #35's medical record was reviewed on 2/2/23 at 11:52 AM. The review revealed a physician order written 11/26/22 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) every shift. In an interview on 2/2/23 at 1:28 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) who was also the acting Infection Preventionist, was asked why the resident was on EBP. She indicated that the resident had a wound on their leg and thought that the wound was resolved in December. Resident #35's most recent Skin and Wound record dated 12/5/22 revealed that a left calf wound was resolved on 12/5/22. Further review of Resident #35's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of medical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) have a process to ensure the clinical pharmacist's monthly medication reviews were reviewed by the physician with a documented response in the resident's medical record, 2) to ensure that monthly medication regimen review was completed by the facility pharmacist, and 3) ensure the physician reviewed and addressed irregularities identified by the clinical pharmacist. This was evident for 6 (Residents #48, #30, #93, #35, #129, and #33) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough monthly evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review it was determined that facility staff failed to 1) keep medication carts locked when unattended, 2) discard multi-dose vials which have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle-punctured) within 28 days, 3) label medications upon opening, and 4) dispose of expired medications. This was evident in 2 of 3 nursing units observed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) 01/31/23, at 12 noon, during an observation of the lunch meal on the 100 hall, an observation was made of an unlocked medication outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor waited approximately 5 minutes for the nurse to return and lock the medication cart. 02/13/23, at 10:05 AM, during an observation of the second floor nursing unit, an observation was made of an unlocked medication outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor notified the charge nurse who locked the medication cart. 02/13/23, at 2:01 PM, during an observation of the second floor nursing unit, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document that resident and/or their Responsible Parties (RPs) were provided education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines before requesting consent, and document residents' vaccination consent form including agree to receive the vaccine or refuse it. This was evident for 4 (Resident #51, #128, #133, and #142) of 5 residents reviewed who were eligible for Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines during the annual survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal vaccine helps prevent pneumococcal disease, which is any type of illness caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a pneumococcal vaccine for age [AGE] years or older and adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease) Flu is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document providing education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine to residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #51 and #128) of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination during the annual survey. The findings include: On 01/25/23 at 01:45 PM, randomly selected five residents COVID-19 vaccination medical records were reviewed. Resident #51 has resided in the facility since August 2021 and received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines on 03/08/22. The second dose of COVID-19 vaccine was documented as consent refused under the electronic medical record immunization tab. However, no COVID-19 vaccine refusal form was filed under his/her medical records. Also, no documentation was found to support the facility educating the resident regarding the vaccine. A review of Resident #128's medical records on 01/25/23 at 2:00 PM revealed that the resident has resided in the facility since August 2022 and had been refused COVID-19 vaccine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse aide competency training (including dementia management and resident abuse prevention training) occurred no less than 12 hours per year. This was evident for 3 (GNAs #48, #49, and #50) of 3 employee training records reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: A review was conducted of GNA personnel files on 2/14/23 at 11:25 AM. A review of GNA #48's personnel file revealed GNA #48 was hired on 1/9/19. A review of GNA #49's personnel file revealed GNA #49 was hired on 8/16/19. A review of GNA #50's personnel file revealed GNA #50 was hired on 9/17/19. An interview was conducted with the Human Resources director (staff #38) on 2/14/23 at 11:35 AM. She was asked about education transcripts and the process of monitoring. She indicated that the facility does not control the electronic system that is utilized for employee education. She indicated that employees are sent emails to notify each employee of due education requirements and the expected date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed treat residents with dignity and respect by failing to encourage and assist residents to dress in their own clothing. This was evident for 1 (#90) of 78 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Resident #90 was observed on 1/27/23 at 10:08 AM walking in the hallway toward the nurses' station wearing a hospital gown in his/her bare feet the gown was open in the back and the residents brief was visible. He/She was observed again on 1/31/23 at 12:20 PM sitting on the side of his/her bed wearing a hospital gown and nonskid socks. Review of Resident #90s medical record on 1/31/23 at 12:31 PM revealed an inventory of belongings list dated 9/19/19 which listed 2 shirts. Resident #90 was observed again on 2/3/23 at 8:57 AM sitting on the side of his/her bed wearing a hospital gown and nonskid socks. A blanket was wrapped around his/her shoulders and back. An observation of Resident #90's room was made with Staff #19 on 2/15/23 at 8:49 AM. Resident #90 was in his/her room wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) notify a resident's physician and family member when a significant weight loss was identified, and 2) notify a resident's Surrogate Decision Maker when changes were made in the residents' psychotropic medications. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 #93) of 78 residents reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) A review of the facility Change in Resident Condition, physician notification policy on 02/06/23 at 11 AM revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure that resident care problems are communicated to the medical staff in a timely, efficient and effective manner, and to ensure that all significant changes in resident condition are assessed and documented in the medical record. The policy for notifying a resident's physician for non-immediate resident changes, that includes a weight change of 5% or more within 30 days, should be minimally notified the next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility staff failed to 1) have an effective process in place to protect resident's property from loss or theft. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for Personal Property, and 2) failed to have a safe clean and comfortable environment on 1 of 3 units observed throughout the survey. The findings include: 1) In an interview on 1/24/23 at 11:22 AM Resident #43 was asked if he/she had any belongings go missing. He/she indicated that he/she had clothing go missing over the past 4 years, that he/she had been reimbursed for some things but not everything. The Resident indicated that a [NAME] blanket had been missing for the past month. When asked if it was reported to anyone the resident indicated that he/she had spoken to the Administrator who said that they can't afford to keep replacing his/her items. In an interview on 1/31/23 02:11 PM Staff #19 the Unit Manager was asked to explain the protocol for resident inventory of belongings. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that all written grievance decisions include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued, and 2) promptly resolve resident grievances. This was evident for 2 (Resident #131 and #43) of 3 residents reviewed for the grievance process during the LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/30/23, a phone interview was conducted with resident #131's representative at 2:48 PM reporting various concerns with the facility and not receiving written responses/notifications related to grievances filed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a facility-reported incident, closed clinical record review, staff interview, and reviews of the facility abuse policy, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free of staff abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) out of 16 residents reviewed for abuse during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings are: A review of facility-reported incident MD00151687 on 02/06/23 revealed that the facility reported an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse on 02/20/20 which was observed by another staff member. The facility also reported the incident to the local police who conducted an onsite investigation. The resident's physician and responsible party were also made aware of the allegations. A review of the facility abuse and resident reporting policy on 02/01/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to comply with the entire measure and intent of Article 43, Section 565 A of the Patients' [NAME] of Rights law to ensure the protection of patients entrusted to our care. The first line of the [NAME] of Rights reiterates the resident's right to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, reviews of the facility investigation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement abuse prevention polices as evidenced by staff's failure to, 1) immediately notify the facility administrator of an allegation of resident abuse, 2) immediately initiate an investigation into the allegation of resident abuse, and 3) report an allegation of resident abuse to the State Regulatory Agency (Office of Health Care Quality). This was evident for 1 of 16 (Resident #57) residents reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During the initial stages of the LTCSP survey, the surveyor interviewed Resident #57's family member who stated that Resident #57 was kicked in the chest by his/her former roommate 1.5 years ago. Resident #57's family member stated that the facility had taken care of the incident immediately. Review of the facility abuse, resident reporting policy on 02/01/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to comply with the entire measure and intent of Article 43, Section 565 A of the Patients…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#48) of 14 residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. The findings include. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Resident #48 was interviewed on 1/25/23 at 2 PM. During the interview resident, #48 revealed he/she did not have any teeth as he/she wore dentures. The resident's medical record was reviewed on 1/27/23. A review of the annual MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/16/22 revealed a miscoding at L0200 (B) as Z none of the above was coded. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to screen a resident to determine if the resident had or may have had a mental disorder (MD), intellectual disability (ID), or related condition. This was identified for 1 of (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASSR) requirements during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: A review of Resident #9's medical record on 01/25/23 revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and anemia. An admission PASSR was not available in the medical record. In an interview with he nursing unit manager on 01/25/23 at 2:14 PM, the unit manager stated that Resident #9's admission PASSR was located on a facility computer hard drive. Further review of Resident #9's medical record revealed that Resident #9 was sent to the hospital and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission. The facility did not have records to show the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 screening was completed prior to admission. This is evident for 2 (#30, #9) of 34 residents in the initial sample of the annual survey. The findings include: The PASARR level 1 screening is federally mandated and must be completed for all applicants to nursing facilities which participate in the Maryland Medical Assistance Program regardless of an applicant's payment source. The purpose of the screening is to help ensure that residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. The program assists in the placement and provision of services for individuals with severe mental illness and/or intellectual disability. 1) Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and or residents' responsible party (RP) a copy of their baseline care plan along with a copy of their admission medications. This was evident for 1 (#131) of 1 resident interviewed about baseline care plans during the annual survey. The findings include: The baseline care plan is given to residents within 48 hours of their admission and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. In addition to the baseline care plan, residents are also expected to receive a list of their admission medications. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. 1) On 1/25/23 at 4:15 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #131. When he/she was asked if the facility provided a baseline care plan or medication list, resident #131 responded no. A phone interview was conducted with the resident's responsible party (RP) on 1/30/23 at 2:48 PM. The RP responded that the resident nor the family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaints, medical record reviews, and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with a shower during the past four weeks of his/her stay. This was evident for 2 (Residents #52, and #195) of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) A complaint was obtained during the survey regarding Resident #52, on 02/06/23 at 1:30 PM, with an allegation that the nursing staff is not providing showers to Resident #52 for the past four weeks. It was also alleged that the nursing staff is instructing Resident #52 to bathe himself/herself. In an interview with Resident #52 on 02/08/23 at 2:40 PM, Resident #52 stated S/he is to receive a shower once a week and that the last shower that S/he received was 3-4 weeks ago. Resident #52 stated that the facility shower chair is not big enough for/him/her. A review of Resident #52's shower/bathing records on 02/09/23 revealed that the nursing staff documented that Resident #52 did not receive a bath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain vision (Resident #52). This is evident for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for vision/hearing during the annual LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: A complaint was obtained during the survey regarding Resident #52, on 02/06/23 at 1:30 PM, with an allegation that the nursing staff are not providing any type of vision support. The complainant stated that Resident #52 is blind and that the nursing staff do not assist Resident #52 were his/her personal items are located or where the food items are located on his/her meal tray. A review of Resident #52's medical record on 02/06/23 revealed that Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, unspecified cataracts, hemodialysis, and amputations of the right and left below the knee/lower legs. In an interview with Resident #52 on 02/08/23 at 2:40 PM, Resident #52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, observation, reviews of medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) cleanse a wound with the prescribed solution, 2) implement measures to minimize the residents' risk of injury, 3) ensure a wound consult was completed timely, and 4) monitor and document treatments and services to promote healing of pressure ulcers. This was evident for 2 (Residents #65, #401, and #405) of 10 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 9:23 AM the surveyor observed Staff #52 the Wound Nurse perform wound care for Resident #65. Staff #52 gathered supplies including Optiform dressing, Aquacel, skin prep, cotton tipped swabs, sterile 4 x 4 gauze pads, a drape, and a 16 ounce spray bottle of Skintegrity wound cleanser. Upon entering Resident 65's room, Staff #52 placed the supplies onto the drape on the residents overbed table. She cleansed her hands and applied gloves. She removed the old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined facility staff failed to follow up on Podiatry consultation report recommendations. This is identified for 1 (resident #131) of 1 resident reviewed for foot concerns. The findings include: Podiatry is a branch of medicine devoted to the study, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of foot, ankle, and lower extremity disorders. A review of resident #131's medical record on 2/13/23 revealed a physician's order for Podiatry Consult was written on 10/19/2022. A review of the medical record did not reveal if resident #131 had been seen by a Podiatrist. An interview was conducted with the unit manager/nurse (staff #37) at 11:45 PM on 2/13/23. When asked if the resident was seen by podiatry, she indicated that the resident was seen. She was informed that the podiatry consultation report was not in the medical record. She looked in a binder and found the original Health Dive initiation on the podiatry consult dated 10/19/22. She could not find the podiatry consult or documentation of when resident #131 was seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's body weight, who had potential nutritional risks due to tube feeding. This was evident for 1 (Resident #33) of 14 residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. The findings include: A PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) feeding tube insertion is the placement of a feeding tube through the skin and the stomach wall. It goes directly into the stomach. Parenteral and enteral feedings are considered in patients with insufficient oral intake or contraindications to anything by mouth. A review of the medical record for Resident #33 on 01/31/23 at 11:30 AM revealed that the resident had a PEG tube since his/her origin admission in August 2022 for Resident #33's history of poor oral intakes. Resident #33 had an order of 1800ml total volume of nutrients and a regular texture thin liquids consistency diet. A review of Resident #33's care plan revealed that the intervention, obtain/ monitor/document weight as ordered, was placed under risk for a deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of residents medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a plan of care that addressed the needs of a resident with dementia. This was evident for 1 (#129) of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. The findings include: Dementia is a general term that describes symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells. Resident #129's electronic and paper medical record was reviewed on 1/30/23 at 2:02 PM. During the review, it was found that the resident was diagnosed with unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, Parkinson's disease. Resident #129 was receiving medications such as Carbidopa-Levodopa or Nuplazid (discontinued on 11/23/22) that were used in treating those diagnoses. Further review of the resident's care plan and interventions revealed that the care plan failed to address the needs of a dementia resident to achieve the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure adequate rationale for increasing antianxiety and antidepressant medications and monitoring of behaviors, behavior interventions and effectiveness for a resident receiving psychotropic medications for anxiety and depression. This was evident for 1 (#35) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. The findings include: Review of Resident #35s medical record on 2/2/23 at 11:52 AM revealed diagnoses which included but were not limited to Dementia, Psychotic disturbance, Mood disturbance and Anxiety. A Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 9/19/22 at 9:44 PM indicated that Resident #35 was irritable, anxious, loud, yelling at staff and complained of anxiety. The note indicated: Medication intervention with rationale: Start Buspar (also known as Buspirone, an anxiety medication) 5 mg (milligrams) twice per day. The physicians' orders reflected an order written on 9/19/22 for Buspirone 5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, as evidenced by administrating overdose of psychotropic medication with the same ingredient but different forms (tablet and sprinkles capsule) for two days. This was evident for 1 (#49) of 5 residents reviewed for an unnecessary medication review during the annual survey. The findings include: The medication Depakote (divalproex sodium) is an anticonvulsant. It is prescribed to treat seizure disorders and to manage the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Depakote has three different forms: Depakote (delayed-release tablets), Depakote ER (extended-release tablets), and Depakote Sprinkle Capsules (delayed-release Capsules). Depakote Sprinkle Capsules work the same way as Depakote Delayed-Release tablets, although they are in capsule form instead of a tablet. Some patients (for example, those with difficulty swallowing) may find it easier to take Depakote Sprinkle Capsules because they can be swallowed whole or opened and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a complaint, reviews of a closed medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a STAT urine sample when a resident was observed with a change in condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #195) of 36 complaints reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: A review of complaint MD00161773 on 02/14/23 revealed an allegation that Resident #195 was not provided with care while residing in the facility. A review of Resident #195's closed medical record on 02/14/23 revealed that Resident #195 was observed with increased confusion on 10/20/20 at 4:48 PM. The nurse notified Resident #195's physician who instructed the nurse to obtain a STAT urinalysis and urine culture. Bloodwork was also ordered at this time on a routine basis. Further review of Resident #195's closed medical record revealed a nurse's progress note, dated 10/20/20 at 5:31 PM, that indicated the nurse was unable to obtain a STAT urine specimen to send to the lab. In an interview with Resident #195's 10/20/20 evening shift charge nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility failed to have sufficient dietary support personnel to provide social dining services in the dining room. This was evident throughout the survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) Observations were made of the facility's only dining room, located on the first floor of the building, from approximately 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM on 1/23/23-1/27/23 and 1/30/23-2/3/23. Group activities were observed taking place however no dining services were provided during that time frame. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes on 1/26/23 at 10:31 AM revealed that the Administrator shared with the council on 1/4/23 that dining room service would return ASAP when the new director starts in the beginning of January. Minutes from a Special Resident Council Meeting held 1/19/23 to discuss Food complaints revealed that the new Food Service Manager, Staff #20 indicated that service in the main dining room would resume when staffing allows. In an interview on 2/3/23 at 10:10 AM Staff #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, observation, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop, prepare, distribute, and serve menus that reflect a resident's nutritional wishes. This was evident for 1 (Resident #96) of 78 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #96 on 1/25/2023 at 12:36 PM, Resident #96 complained that the food was usually cold, and s/he was not given a menu to choose from. Resident # 96 added that what was served did not match what they had on the meal ticket, and they don't give you alternate food choices. While the surveyor was in the resident's room, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #27) brought in Resident #96's lunch tray. Surveyor observed that the food items on the lunch tray did not match what was written on the meal ticket. Resident #96 refused the meal and stated that s/he did not like the food. GNA #27 took the tray out without offering the resident any alternate food choice or substitute. Surveyor immediately interviewed GNA #27 who confirmed that the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, observation, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food that accommodates resident preferences and/or appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice. This was evident for 2 (#96, #342)) of 78 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) In an interview with Resident #96 on 1/25/2023 at 12:36 PM, Resident #96 complained that the food was usually cold, and s/he was not given a menu to choose from. Resident # 96 added that what was served did not match what they had on the meal ticket, and they don't give you alternate food choices. While the surveyor was in the resident's room, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #27) brought in Resident #96's lunch tray. Surveyor observed that the food items on the lunch tray did not match what was written on the meal ticket. Resident #96 refused the meal and stated that s/he did not like the food. GNA #27 took the tray out without offering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint, reviews of a closed medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to correctly evaluate and provide a resident with a full cognitive workup as recommended by a speech-language pathologist (SLP). This was evident for 1 (Resident #195) of 36 complaints reviewed during an LTCSP recertification survey. The findings include: A review of complaint MD00161773 on 02/14/23 revealed an allegation that Resident #195 was not provided with care while residing in the facility. A review of Resident #195's closed medical record on 02/14/23 revealed that Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At that time, Resident #195's physician instructed the staff to obtain a Speech-Language Pathology screen and to treat as indicated. A review of the 10/08/20 SLP, staff member #60, screening criteria noted that Resident #195 had a mental status change, having problems with memory, orientation, or problem-solving, and a change in the resident's condition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure 1) accurate documentation of oxygen administration for 1 (#111) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care, and 2) failed to maintain complete and accurate inventory of belongings for 3 (#70, #137, and #90) of 78 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #111's medical record on 2/13/24 at 8:37 AM revealed a physician order written 12/27/22 for Oxygen via Nasal Cannula at 2-3 LPM (liters per minute) Goal O2 saturation greater than 95%. Review of the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for January and February 2023 revealed the physicians order for oxygen. The spaces provided for administration times were labeled PRN (as needed). The oxygen was not signed off by the nursing staff as administered to the resident nor did it reflect how many liters of oxygen were administered. Staff #19 the 2A Unit Manager was interviewed on 2/13/23 at 12:41 PM. She was shown the TAR and made aware that the order indicated a range of 2-3 liters, the TAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the information used to complete the Annual and Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1) Functional Status; Activities of Daily Living and 2) Bladder and Bowel were accurate. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 4 residents (Resident #119, Resident #44 and Resident #26) reviewed for activities of daily living and 1 out of 1 (Resident #26) reviewed for bladder and bowel during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include: MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Activities of Daily Living or ADL's are basic self-care tasks. They include bed mobility, toileting, grooming, maintaining continence, putting on clothes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, record review, and staff interview it was the determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident-centered care plans to address: 1) the the resident's choice to not have facial hair shaved and 2) the care of a resident's Permacath (a catheter used for dialysis). This was found to be true with 2 of 2 residents (Resident #31 and Resident #96) reviewed for patient centered care plans during the survey. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #31 and their Resident Representative (RR) on 12/11/18 at 1:41 PM. During the interview the resident alerted surveyor to an area on the right side of their cheek near the mouth. Surveyor noted several small white raised bumps clustered reaching from the corner fold of the mouth to just under the right nostril. Also observed were 5 to 6 clusters of flat white circles and numerous short strands of thick hair along the cheek, jawline, and upper neck of the resident. Several of the strands were curled toward their skin. Resident #31 rubbed the raised bumps and stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to update care plans to 1) meet the specific needs for a resident with a history of falls and 2) a resident diagnosed with anemia (a condition where the patient does not have enough red blood cells to carry oxygen to parts of the body). This was found to be evident for 2 of 30 residents (Resident's #109 and #131) that were investigated during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: 1. A medical record review was conducted on Resident #109 on 12/18/18 at 2:30 PM and it revealed the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 12/8/18 and 12/9/18 resulting in a cervical fracture and laceration to head. Review of Resident #109's medical record revealed a history of resisting care and agitation at times and impulsivity. Review of the Incident/Accident report indicated that on 12/8/18 Resident #109 was observed sitting on the floor close to his/her bed and wheel chair, in his/her room bleeding from forehead. Additionally, on 12/9/18 Resident #109 was noted on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-12-18 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to put a system in place to ensure that food and beverages are healthy and satisfying to residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: During a meeting with the facility's Resident Council on 12/13/18 at 9:21 AM, members stated that they have expressed concerns in several council meetings regarding the temperature, appearance, and taste and timeliness of meals. Residents stated that for the past several months, the meal trays and service carts arrived late to the units and dining rooms resulting in cold food. They added that the dinner meal services have arrived at least 1 to 2 hours late and that the previous evening (12/12/18) the first of the delivery carts for the 2nd floor unit did not come until 6:30 PM. Because of the delays, the servers in the dining room are rushed which resulted in food served cold, and/or burnt, and messily plated. During an interview with the Food Service Director and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to: 1) follow resident's meal tickets and 2) provide foods that are consistent with the resident diet plan and 3) provide meals on time 4) put a system in place to provide food and drink that was attractive, appetizing, at acceptable temperatures, and assure that food is stored in a way to maintain its nutritional value for residents. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #41, Resident #95 and Resident #110) investigated for food concerns and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident #41 on 12/11/18 at 2:00 PM and s/he complained that the food is not correct when it is brought to them by dietary. The resident went on to say that the dietary department is unable to read the dietary slips and stated that if they are reading the diet slips correctly, why was s/he served a pureed diet, when my diet slips reads regular? An observation was made of Resident #41's plate of food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-12-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to put a system in place to ensure that residents meals and snacks were offered at scheduled times. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: During a meeting with resident representatives on 12/13/18 at 9:21 AM it was revealed that they have expressed concerns in the past several months regarding the lack of timeliness of the delivery of meals and snacks in the facility. The dinner meal services have arrived at least 1 to 2 hours late and that the previous evening (12/12/18) the first of the delivery carts for the 2nd floor unit did not come until 6:30 PM. The residents added that snacks are not provided consistently and that they must request several times during the evening to receive them. Residents stated that on 12/12/18 evening snacks for Diabetic residents were not delivered at all. During an interview with the Food Service Director and the Administrator on 12/13/18 at 11:00 AM, the FSD admitted that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: An observation of the kitchen on 12/18/18 at 12:46 pm was conducted. Surveyors noted several food tray lids were on the floor. Additional observation revealed that Staff #31 bent down, pick the trays off the floor, placed then on a nearby food prep counter, then proceeded to grab clean plates and continued to serve meals without removing gloves, sanitizing their hands or removing the tray lids from the service area. The Administrator was alerted to surveyor's findings and redirected staff after surveyor's intervention. (Cross Reference F 880) Further observation at 12:51 pm revealed that the bin containing individual milk cartons for lunch distribution failed to have ice in it. Additional observation revealed that the temperature of the milk in one of the cartons was 48 degrees.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) promote care for a resident in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity and respect by failing to provide a privacy cover to a resident with Foley drainage bag and 2) failure to knock and wait for permission to enter a resident room. This was found to be true for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #44 and Resident #31) reviewed for dignity. The findings include: A Foley catheter is a urinary collection system consisting of a tube inserted into the bladder. The urine then drains through the tubing into a drainage bag that is attached to the side of the bed or chair. A privacy cover is placed over the drainage bag to hide the contents thus ensuring privacy and preventing embarrassment for the resident, roommate or visitors. 1. During a tour of unit 2 on 12/10/18, Resident #44 was observed from the hallway with his/her Foley drainage bag exposed. Review of the medical records on 12/10/18 revealed that Resident #44…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to promote care for a resident in a manner that would ensure the resident's dignity. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 44 residents (Resident #44) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: An observation was made on 12/12/18 at 12:50 PM of Staff #21, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), assisting Resident #44 with his/her lunch in their room. The GNA stood above the resident and fed him/her their lunch. Staff #22, a nurse, walked into the resident room at that time to check on the resident. As Staff #22 exited the room, at 12:52 PM, the surveyor asked Staff #22 if there was a reason why the GNA was standing and feeding Resident #44 and s/he responded that there was no chair in the resident room. The nurse, Staff # 22, went into another room and retrieved a chair and took it into Resident #44's room and the GNA, Staff #21 sat down and continued to assist the resident with his/her meal. During the interim while the nurse retrieved the chair, the GNA Staff #21 continued to stand above the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview with staff and family members, the facility failed to ensure that resident bathing areas were free of hazards that may cause injury to the residents. This has the potential to affect any resident that utilized the shower in Hall 1A. The facility also failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for Resident #2. This was evident for 1 out of 45 Residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 12/18/18 at 1:40 PM during an environmental tour of Hall 1A with Staff #23, the residents' shower area floor (first shower stall) had a 4 inch x 2 inch area of cracked and peeling paint with raised edges that may cause injury to a resident while barefoot. Staff #23 and the administrator did acknowledge the surveyor's concerns during the tour. 2. A family interview was conducted on 12/10/18 at 9:30 AM with Resident #2's spouse and child. Family members stated that for months they have talked to the laundry staff and the unit manager and repeatedly requested that the facility not do the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon resident interviews, record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to consider or act upon Resident Council's grievances regarding food service. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents receiving food/meal services in the facility. The findings include; Resident Council is a group of residents that meets regularly on behalf of all residents in the facility to discuss and offer suggestions about facility policies and procedures affecting residents' care, treatment, and quality of life. Facility staff are required to consider residents' views and act upon grievances and recommendations. Facility staff must consider these recommendations and attempt to accommodate them, to the extent practicable. On 12/13/18 at 9:21 AM a meeting with the facility's Resident Council was conducted. Members stated that they have expressed concerns in several council meetings regarding the temperature, appearance, taste and timeliness of meals. Residents stated that for the past several months, the meal trays and service carts arrived…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or resident's representative were notified in writing of the resident's transfer and the rationale for the transfer. This was found to be evident for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #103 and Resident #119) reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative stage of the survey. The finding includes: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 on 12/12/18 at 2:45 PM revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in November 2018 and then discharged to the hospital within the first few weeks of admission to the facility. During an interview with the resident on 12/12/18 the surveyor asked if he/she received any documentation from the facility indicating why the resident was being transferred/discharged to the hospital. The resident's response was that they did not give me anything. Further review of the medical records failed to reveal any documentation that the facility provided a copy of the notice of reason for transfer/discharge to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative manual review, medical records review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and or their resident representative (RP) with the documentation of the facility's bed-hold policy. This was evident for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #103 and Resident #119) reviewed for planned and unplanned hospitalizations during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: Review of the facility bed-hold policy revealed that the resident and his/her surrogate decision maker or court appointed legal representative would be provided written and or verbal information regarding the bed-hold policy at the facility 1. On 12/12/18 Resident #103's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident had an unplanned transfer to the hospital 2 weeks after admission. Further review of the medical records revealed that the facility failed to provide the resident or RP with a copy of the bed-hold policy upon transfer/admission to the hospital. During an interview with the Director of Nursing(DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers. This was found to be evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #99) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following but not limited diagnosis: Peripheral Arterial Disease (A circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). A medical record review was conducted for Resident #99 on 12/14/18 at 10:45 AM. Review of the resident care plan revealed the resident had a care plan in place for actual pressure ulcer related to disease process, history of ulcers and immobility that was initiated on 5/18/18. Another care plan for an actual arterial ulcer related to history of ulcers, limited joint mobility and peripheral arterial disease that was initiated on 9/26/18. Further review revealed the facility failed to have a potential for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Blood glucose level is the amount of glucose (sugar) in the blood. The amount of glucose in the blood is measured in units of mg/dl or mmol/l. Blood sugar levels that are too high or too low can be a dangerous condition and without immediate treatment can cause serious complications. A review of the medical for Resident #96 was conducted on 12/10/18 at 10:00 AM. Review of a physician order dated 10/17/18 stated to check the resident's blood sugar level twice a day and notify the physician if the resident's blood sugar level was below 80 mg/dl or above 250 mg/dl. However, review of the October 2018 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) conducted on 12/13/18 indicated that the order was started on 10/22/18. Further review of the resident's TAR revealed that from October 2018 to December 2018, there were five entries by staff that indicated blood sugar levels above 250 mg/dl and one entry the level was below 80 mg/dl. However, there was no documentation to support that the physician was notified about the levels as ordered. The Director of Nursing was made aware of surveyor's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor behaviors for a resident who was prescribed antipsychotic medication. This was evident for 1 out of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A family interview was conducted on 12/10/18 at 10:10 AM with Resident #2's spouse. Spouse stated that he/she felt the Resident was less interactive and had slowly been declining in awareness of his/her surroundings since the Resident was first admitted . A record review conducted on 12/10/18 at 2:20 PM revealed Resident #2 had a diagnosis of depression and had been prescribed two medications for this condition prior to admission and continued on both medications after admission. Record review conducted on 12/12/18 at 1:30 PM revealed a physician order dated 7/11/18 for a third medication for depression and a physician order dated 7/31/18 for an antipsychotic medication for agitation. Record review on 12/13/18 at 10:45 AM of behavioral health progress notes from the previous 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with a resident and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide what was on the menu for a resident who was served lunch. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident # 41) while observing lunch being served during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #41 on 12/11/18 at 2:00 PM and s/he complained that the food was not correct when it is brought to them by dietary. The resident went on to say that the dietary department is unable to read the dietary slips and stated that if they are reading the diet slips correctly, why was s/he served a pureed diet, when my diet slips reads regular? An observation was made of Resident #41's plate of food and there was a serving of pureed spinach on his/her plate. The resident also stated that dinner is sometimes served as late as 7:00 PM at times. Review of Resident #41's diet slip that was on his/her tray indicated a regular diet. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/17/18. The DM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) follow infection control practices and guidelines while performing duties and caring for residents and 2) provide sanitary storage conditions to prevent the development and transmission of disease by not providing proper storage of resident mattress and fall mats after disinfection by central supply. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. 1a. During an observation of the 1A Unit on 12/11/18 at 01:26 pm, surveyor noted Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) (Staff #33) enter room [ROOM NUMBER] with a white Styrofoam cup labeled Rm #120 and placed on top of a dispenser to care for a resident in the room. The GNA exited the room, sat the cup on a nearby medication cart, poured water into cup from a pitcher and took it to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The GNA was interviewed immediately after the observation in the presence of their Unit Manager (UM) (Staff #5). The GNA acknowledged surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-02-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Geriatric Nurse Aides (GNA) per shift, and failed to have the staff data requirements available in an accurate, clear and readable format. This was evident for the initial 4 days of the annual survey beginning on 1/23/23. The findings include. An initial tour of the facility on 1/23/23 did not reveal a facility-wide staff posting indicating the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses (RN), Licensed practical nurses (LPN), and Certified nursing aides (CNA) per shift. Each subsequent survey day did not reveal the Federal requirements for the posting of nursing staffing. An interview was conducted with the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/26/23 at 2:34 PM. The Nursing home administrator was asked the whereabouts of the Federal requirements for the posting of staffing. The NHA showed a document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,251 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,251 — penalty dated 2025-07-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.8-2.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COURTLAND OPERATING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 09/01/2014
GINGER CAT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 09/01/2014
NJM794, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/01/2014
PRACTICE DYNAMICS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST49%since 03/01/2016
LIFEBRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST49%since 03/01/2016
SPADARO, JOHNIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2014
MUSA, VICTORIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/16/2020
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2014
ATTMAN, LEONARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2014
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2014
FC OF COURTLAND INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 8%Other / private 92%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,132per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next