No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Future Care Cold Spring

4700 Harford Road, Baltimore, MD 21214 · For profit - Corporation · 137 certified beds · (410) 254-3300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 254-3300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,042 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,042 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3216 Batavia Ave · (443) 486-3866 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4226 Harford Rd · (443) 497-7777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4717 Harford Rd
Park
3001 Parkside Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.1%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.0%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.3%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.0%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.6%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.3%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.801.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 279 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.9%CMS range 46.5–58.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 9.2–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.1–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.24
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.06
RN hoursweekends
59.2%
Total nursing turnover
54.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 126.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.476 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.24 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.32 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-07)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

75 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 64 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident #92 received adequate supervision and failed to prevent elopement. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's recertification survey. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy. After the incident, the facility developed, initiated, and completed a plan of correction to prevent further elopement of residents. Therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past non-compliance. The date of correction was 1/28/2022. The findings include: On 3/4/24 at 12:46 PM the surveyor reviewed the facility's self-report form sent to the Office of Health Care Quality for an incident that occurred on 1/26/22 regarding Resident #92. The self-report form indicated the facility's Administrator (during that time) received a call from the hospital regarding the resident having been found by EMS walking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety. This was evident in 2 of 3 kitchen observations and 2 of 2 nourishment room observations during an annual survey. The findings included: On 9/29/25 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor made an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. Upon entering the kitchen, the surveyor noted dripping from the ceiling outside of the walk-in refrigerator/freezer. A bread cart was next to the refrigerator/freezer door, and a spice rack was across from it. Two containers collected the dripping water on the floor. On 9/29/25 at 8:17 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director Staff #1. During the interview, Staff #1 stated he believed the dripping was from condensation. On 9/29/25 at 8:34 AM, the surveyor asked the Nursing Home Administrator if he was aware of the dripping from the kitchen ceiling. The NHA stated he was not but would follow-up. On 9/29/25 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor conducted a follow-up interview with the NHA. During the interview, the NHA stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by keeping complete and accurate documentation. This was found evident in 3 (Resident #124, #127 and #137) out of 51 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/01/25 at 9:05 AM a review of the facility's investigation of an incident pertaining to Resident # 124 revealed the staffing sheet dated 06/25/25 Unit 3B on 06/25/25 7:00 AM -3:00 PM shift indicated Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #8 had an assignment on the unit. The surveyor asked the Administrator where the statement from GNA #8 was since he/she worked on the unit where the alleged incident occurred. The Administrator verbalized GNA #8 assignment was changed, and he/she was moved to Unit 3B. The surveyor asked the Administrator when the GNA assignment changed should the staffing sheet have been updated. The Administrator verbalized, yes. On 10/01/25 at 10:02 am a review of the Change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain practices to help prevent the transmission of infections. This was evident in 1 (Resident #137) of 9 residents reviewed for indwelling medical devices/wounds and observations of the laundry area during the recertification survey.The findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with an MDRO, as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices).1) On 9/29/25 at 9:11 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #137 had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in his/her right upper arm, a foley catheter, multiple pressure ulcers, and an ostomy. The surveyor further observed no sign or indication to staff that they should be utilizing EBP while performing any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate conditions of equipment. This was evident during 2 of 3 observations of ice machines and 1 of 1 of the laundry room. The findings include:On 10/6/25 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor observed the 3rd floor nourishment room located close to the elevator. Upon opening the door, the surveyor noted water on the floor just below the ice maker machine, and the ice machine's tray was filled to the top with water. Next, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #24 and asked if she was aware of the ice machine's condition. She stated she was not and would let maintenance know. On 10/6/25 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor observed the 2nd floor nourishment room located close to the elevator. The surveyor noted moist tan particles at the bottom of the ice machine's tray. The Regional Director of Nursing (RDON) was on the floor and the surveyor asked if the ice machine was clean. The RDON stated she believed that cleaning could not remove some of the white areas seen on the tray. Next, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with a reasonable accommodation of need, as evidenced during one (Resident #138) random observation on the survey. The findings included: On 9/29/25 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #138 and his/her family member. Resident #138 stated the facility recently removed his/her side rails, and he/she was not able to move in the bed. On 9/29/25 at 1:32 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA confirmed that the facility removed the side rails from Resident's beds and was reassessing if they needed them. He further stated that the facility was ensuring assessments were completed, and that residents were care planned for side rails. The surveyor requested Resident #138's side rail assessment. Next, the surveyor reviewed Resident #138's side rail assessment, completed on 9/20/25. The assessment recommended 1/4 siderail assist handles to serve as an enabler to promote independence. On further review, the surveyor noted in Resident #138's physical therapy evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if a Resident had an Advanced Directive and/or offer to help formulate one if determined not to have one. This was evident in 2 (Resident #138 & #4) of 3 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives during an annual survey. The findings included: 1a) On 9/30/25 at 8:11 AM, the surveyor reviewed the paper medical record for Resident #138. The paper medical record did not contain Advanced Directives (AD)s. On 9/30/25 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Social Service Director, Staff #3. During the interview, the surveyor asked if Resident #138 was asked about AD or offered to make them. Staff #3 stated she had met with the resident and was not sure. She stated that recently she had help from the corporate social workers to help review residents' ADs and would follow back up. On 10/1/25, Staff #3 wrote a progress note related to reaching out for ADs. However, this was documented after the surveyor requested this documentation. At the time of exit, no documentation was provided to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff physically/verbally abused a resident. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#126) of two facility reported incidents reviewed for alleged abuse during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 10/01/25 at 10:22 AM the surveyor reviewed the investigation related to Resident #126 allegation of abuse. According to the investigation on 03/27/25 Maintenance Assistant #38 reported he/she witnessed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)# 18 pull their hand back and swung hitting the resident on the left shoulder. The swung had enough force that Resident #126 stumbled back into the wardrobe armoire behind them. Director of Social Services #3 interviewed Resident #126 roommate who was in the room during the time of the alleged incident. The roommate did not see the incident but verbalized they heard Resident #126 yell, why did you hit me, and they heard a stumble. GNA #18 denied hitting the resident but told Resident #126, I'm going to bop you. Director of Social Services #3 interviewed Resident #126…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately prescribe psychotropic medication for a resident without documented need for one. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #4) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Psychotropic medications are used to treat mental health disorders and are considered any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception. There are five main types of psychotropic medications, and each type has its own specific uses, benefits, and side effects. The five main types are: antidepressants, anti-anxiety, stimulants, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. On 10/1/25 at 7:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #4's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] and was ordered Quetiapine (also known as Seroquel) (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder) 50 mg at bedtime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the state agency within the two-hour allotted time frame. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#124 & #126) of 3 facility reported incident investigations reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 09/30/25 at 12:59 PM a review of the facility's investigation of the facility reported incident related to Resident #124 revealed the facility staff became aware of the alleged incident on 06/26/25 at 6:50 AM. The incident was reported to the state agency on 06/26/25 at 9:23 AM which was outside of the two-hour allotted timeframe for reporting incidents. On 10/01/25 at 1:50 PM a review of the facility's investigation of the facility reported incident related to Resident #126 revealed the facility staff became aware of the alleged incident occurred on 03/27/25 at 1:40 PM. The incident was reported to the state agency on 03/27/25 at 03/27/25 at 3:51 PM, which was outside of the two-hour allotted timeframe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement patient-centered comprehensive care plans to meet the needs of residents. This was evident for 2 (Residents #1 and #4) out of 51 residents reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:A care plan is a formal document that outlines a nursing home resident's medical and personal care needs. 1) During a record review of Resident #1's Care Plan on 10/01/2025 at 12:17 PM, a care plan problem was identified that read, (SPECIFY Impaired memory / cognition) r/t (SPECIFY neurological disorder) as evidenced by ______. The Regional Clinical Service Manager (RCSM) was asked about the expectation was for filling in brackets when creating care plans. The RCSM stated Social Services was responsible for that entry and the expectation was that details should be documented when the care plan is written. Social Worker #3 acknowledged on 10/02/2025 at 12:09 PM that the care plan should be patient-specific and the bracketed information needed to be patient-centered. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 64 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the standard of practice for nurses as evidenced that a nurse failed to notify the physician when a resident refused a treatment and a nurse completed a Change in Condition Evaluation 11 days after the change occurred. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#124 & #125) of 5 resident records reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 09/30/25 at 11:35 AM a review of Resident #124 electronic health record (EHR) revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #10 completed a change in condition evaluation on 07/07/25 and the form was back dated to 06/26/25. On 09/30/25 at 12:13 PM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) the surveyor asked when the staff are expected to document when a change occurs with a resident. The DON verbalized a change in condition evaluation form should be completed before the end of the shift. The Unit Managers or supervisors are supposed to ensure the staff completes documentation in a timely manner. On 10/03/25 at 8:55 AM a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent Residents. This was evident in 1(Resident #4) out of 2 Residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care. The findings included: On 10/1/25 at 8:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #4's medical record. A note written by Physician # 27 on 9/25/25 stated Resident #4 was recently admitted to the facility after functional decline in ambulation and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to a fall with fractures and right upper extremity weakness. On 9/30/25 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in the lounge area in a reclining chair. The surveyor noted long nails on all of Resident's left fingers which all appeared to be 1/2 inch long and had a dark substance under them. The surveyor reviewed the TASK documentation for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) cares for personal hygiene for Resident #4 for the month of September. Resident #4 was documented as dependent for ability to maintain personal hygiene. No refusals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for residents and address significant weight gain. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) out of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. Significant weight change is defined as a gain or loss of 5% of a person's weight within 30 days, 7.5% within 90 days, or 10% within 180 days. Significant weight change requires clinical evaluation and, if the change is not beneficial, intervention. The findings include: On 10/1/25 at 12:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #8. The review revealed that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January of 2024. Resident #8's past medical history included major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, acquired absence of the leg above the knee, and dementia. Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed weights taken:9/1/25 212.6 Pounds (lbs)8/13/25- 211 lbs8/8/25- 202.8 lbs7/31/25- 203.4 lbs7/2/25- 203.2 lbs6/24/25- 203.26/17/25- 211.2 lbs6/11/25- 212.3 lbs6/6/26- 209…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a tube feeding bag was labeled. This was evident for 1 resident ( #89) of 3 residents reviewed for tube feedings during the annual survey. The findings include: On 09/29/2025 at 10:57 AM during an initial observation of Resident #89, both the tube feeding formula bag and the flush bag were found hanging on the tube feeding pump. The formula bag was full, and the flush bag was half full. Neither bag was labeled with the resident's name, the type of formula, the date and time the bag was hung, or the name/initials of the staff member who hung them. On 09/29/2025 at 11:15 AM Staff #6, a Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed that Resident #89 receives daily tube feedings. When shown the unlabeled bags and asked about the formula, the recipient, the hanging time, and the staff member responsible, Staff #6, RN stated, I am not sure if Resident #89 received the tube feeding because another shift hangs the bag and night shift takes the bag down by 6:00 AM. Staff #6,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility's physician failed to acknowledge and/or address recommended interventions for a resident with significant weight gain. This was evident in 1 (Resident #8) out of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: On 10/1/25 at 12:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #8. The review revealed that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2024. Resident #8's past medical history included major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, acquired absence of the leg above the knee, and dementia. Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed weight changes over a year. Resident #8 had an 11.13% weight gain from 10/3/24 to 3/6/25 during this 6-month time period, and a 23.75% weight gain from 3/6/25 to 9/1/25, during this 6-month time period. Next, the surveyor reviewed the dietary progress notes. On 6/12/25, a note written by Dietitian #31 confirmed weight gain from the reweight obtained and stated she continued to question a +41 pound weight gain in 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete required annual performance reviews for Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) at least once every 12 months. This finding was identified for 2 of the 3 GNA staff members (GNA #22 and #23) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 10/6/2025 at 9:45 PM, annual competencies for three random GNA's were requested. Record reviews revealed that Staff #22, GNA and Staff #23, GNA did not have their annual performance reviews for 2024 and 2025. On 10/06/2025 at 11:56 AM Staff #5, the Regional Clinical Service Manager (RCSM), was interviewed and asked if any additional documentation could be provided for Staff #22 and Staff #23's annual GNA performance reviews. Currently, Staff #22's last annual GNA performance review was on 6/27/2023 and Staff #23's last annual GNA performance review was on 6/29/2023. Staff # 5 RCSM stated what I have given you is all the documentation that I have for these staff members. Staff #5, the RCSM, verbalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility staff failed to 1) obtain and administer medications according to procedures and, 2) failed to accurately and safely to conduct and apply before each meal's insulin sliding scale. This was evident for two residents (#133 and #43) out of 10 reviewed for medications. The findings include:1) On 10/6/25, at 1:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #133's medical record. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2024 indicated that four different medications were coded 9 (other, see progress notes) in the administration documentation. Three of those medications had progress notes that stated the medication was ordered, but the pharmacy still needed to deliver them to the facility. The medications were: Famotidine (start date of April 9, 2024) coded 9 on May 3, 2024. Levothyroxine (start date of December 2, 2023) coded 9 on May 29, 2024. Nasal Moist Nasal Solution (start date of May 25, 2024) coded 9 on May 26, 2024. On 10/6/25, at 1:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed Staff #5, the Regional Clinical Service Manager.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the medical record and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists. This was evident for 1 (#12) of 51 residents reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:During a review of the consulting pharmacist's monthly recommendations for Resident #12 on 10/03/2025 at 8:30 AM, it was recommended that the prescriber document a rational for use and a duration date for lorazepam. The physician reviewed the recommendation and signed that they would refer to end of life consultant. The current order read, LORazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML (Lorazepam) Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety, agitation end of life care -Start Date08/05/2025 1045. No end date was written. The review was signed as completed by Physician #30. During an interview Physician #30 acknowledged on 10/03/2025 at 11:40 AM, that although the recommendation for the indication for end of life care was made, there was no stop date added as recommended by the Clinical Pharmacist. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services in a timely manner. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for laboratory services reviewed during the annual survey The findings include: On 10/1/25 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #2's medical record. The review revealed Resident #2 had a past medical history of dementia and behavioral disturbances. Resident #2's care plan listed a risk for complications related to aphasia and apraxia, affecting response to care, and noted refusal of laboratory (Lab) samples. Next, the surveyor reviewed the progress notes. On 9/26/25, Registered Nurse (RN) #29 documented that a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) result was cancelled due to a missing date of birth (DOB) identifier. The note further states that the provider was informed, and a new order for a BMP for Monday 9/29/25 was given. On 10/1/25 at 12:59 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #2's orders. No order was found for a redraw of the BMP lab. On 10/2/25 at 1:46 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure two Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) received Dementia training upon hire and failed to complete an annual employee evaluation. This deficient practice was evidenced in three GNA records reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 09/30/25 at 2:47 pm a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #17 employee training record revealed the GNA was hired in March 2025 and did not receive Dementia training. On 10/01/25 at 2:22 pm a review of GNA #18 employee training record revealed there was no documentation to verify the GNA received Dementia training. The GNA was hired on 07/08/24 and was terminated on 04/04/25. A review of GNA #36 employee record revealed the GNA was hired on 04/24/24 and is currently working in the facility. The GNA did not have their annual evaluation after one year of employment. On 10/01/25 10:06 am during an interview with Regional Director of Operations #37 verbalized they don't have evidence to verify GNA#17 received Dementia training,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the amount of the surety bond was comparable to the amount of the resident funds entrusted to the facility. This was evident during a review of Personal Funds during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/07/24 at 8:42 AM during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Corporate Accounts Receivable Manager (Staff #33), Staff #33 indicated that resident's personal funds were kept in separate accounts and that the facility had a surety bond to cover the total amount of residents' personal funds. The surveyor asked for a list of residents who had personal fund accounts, the total amount of resident personal funds held by the facility, and for a copy of the surety bond. On 3/07/24 at 12:55 PM a review of the document titled Trial Balance which indicated an as of 03/07/24 date, revealed a list of 75 residents and their corresponding account balances which totaled $172,021.92. A review of the surety bond revealed the Bond Amount: $170,000.00 with an effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview of facility residents and staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 2/23/24 at 9:02AM the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #22 who reported the following concern: The person in charge of the kitchen is no longer here, we were getting really good food, but now, we get food like chicken a'la king with no taste to it, I couldn't eat it. By the time food gets to us, it is cold, our cart is the third cart. On 2/22/24 at 10:50AM the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #116 who described the facility's food as terrible and reported that most of the time, they did not eat it. On 2/23/24 at 8:50AM the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident # 57 who reported they did not like the food, and it is always cold, never get a warm meal. On 3/11/24 at 12:24PM the surveyor observed the serving line and steam table as lunch was being served and noted that steam was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's kitchen, review of kitchen records and interviews of dietary staff, it was determined that the facility: 1.) failed to ensure sanitary practices were followed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; 2.) failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, 3.) failed to store, label, and monitor expiration, of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and 4.) failed to ensure monitoring and oversight of kitchen equipment and environment. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1.) On 2/21/24 at 7:58AM, the surveyor conducted observations of the facility's kitchen at which time the surveyor observed Staff #46, Dietary Aide, without a hair restraint, and Staff #45, Dietary Cook, standing over the steam table stirring hot cereal with no hair restraint covering their beard. On 2/21/24 at 8:02AM the surveyor observed Staff #46 obtain and put on a hair restraint. On 2/21/24 at 8:02AM the surveyor conducted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility 1.) failed to utilize appropriate infection control process with the hanging of a urinary bag (Resident #51) 2.) failed to ensure that the Infection Prevention Control program (IPCP) policy was reviewed and updated annually and 3.) failed to assure that staff were educated to handle and process dirty laundry in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. This was evident during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. Upon surveyor's initial tour on 2/21/23 at 9:39AM an observation was made of Resident #51 lying in bed, Further observation revealed that he had a Urinary catheter a device that drains urine from the bladder. The urinary bag was hanging on a Velcro attached to the bed frame, half of the bag was in contact with the bare floor. On 2/21/24 at 9: 22 AM Staff #15 came into the room while the surveyor was still there, she was shown the urinary catheter touching the floor, she readjusted the bag, so it did not touch the floor and stated that she was just starting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to failed to assure that each resident receives an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, and ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (Resident #128, #93, #291) of 5 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy, and 1 (Resident #89) of 10 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. A pressure ulcer, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) On 2/23/2024 at 9:00 AM, in an interview with Resident #57, the resident stated that s/he had facility acquired right buttocks bed sores and a right leg wound. Resident #57 further stated that the wounds were improving, and dressings changed daily. During a review of Resident #57's medical record conducted on 2/29/2024 at 8:45 AM, surveyor noted active physician orders dated 2/6/2024 for right buttock and right calf wounds to Cleanse with NSS (normal saline solution). Apply Calcium Alginate with Medi-honey cover with a border gauze daily, every day shift for wound care. On 2/29/2024 at 11:35 AM, a review of Resident #57's care plan was completed: A Plan of Care was developed for Resident #57 for Actual impaired skin integrity to right lower calf and bilateral buttocks r/t declined mobility as evidenced by pressure injury created on 2/5/2024 with revision on 2/5/2024. The interventions included but were not limited to: Monitor dressing at least every shift to ensure it is intact and adhering. However, the plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plan meetings were conducted as required. This was evident for 4 (Resident #33, #82, #91 and #98) out of 67 residents reviewed for resident care, and one complaint (MD00178503) of 16 complaints reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 2/28/24 at 12:44 PM a record review of Resident #91's MDS assessment entries revealed that the resident had a quarterly MDS assessment completed for the assessment reference date 11/21/23. Further record review revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3) A review of Resident #98's monthly Medication Regimen Review (MMR) on 2/28/24 at 12:49 PM revealed that the pharmacist recommendations were made on 7/14/23, 8/15/23, 9/07/23, 10/05/23, 11/08/23, 12/08/23, 1/05/24, and 2/09/24 with details: On 7/14/23, the pharmacist recommended changing the hydrocortisone (for anti-itching) cream to PRN (as needed) or discontinuing it. On 8/15/23, the pharmacist commented that to clarify directions as either one tablet or two tablets for resident has a new order for Oxycodone 5mg give two tabs every 6 hours PRN for give one tab every 6 hours PRN for pain 7-10. On 9/07/23, the pharmacist recommended clarifying the same order as last month (8/15/23). On 10/05/23, the resident ordered Bio-freeze gel twice a day for the back and Menthyl 5% patch for the lower back twice a day. The pharmacist recommended clarifying which medication the resident should be receiving for the lower back. On 11/08/23, the pharmacist commented to change menthol patch and Lidoderm path order one of these to apply one at 9 AM and remove at 9 PM and other patch to be applied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of administrative documents, and interviews of residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievances and concerns from the resident (group) council were documented, reviewed, and responses provided to the group in writing. This was evident in a review of 9 of 9 resident council meeting minutes reviewed. The findings include: An introduction interview was held with the resident council president (Resident #78) on 2/27/24 at 12:00 PM. The resident council president revealed that he/she has lived at the facility for approximately 4.5 years. Upon request the resident council president provided permission for the survey team to review resident council minutes from the past 6-months. The resident council president revealed that the activity's staff assist in conducting the meetings and recording the minutes. Additionally, the resident council president revealed that he/she has not ever reviewed the bimonthly meeting minutes. Copies of the requested resident council minutes were received on 2/28/24. Review of the resident council meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident on 2 of 4 nursing units reviewed during both the Infection Control facility task and the Resident Council facility task. The findings include: On 3/8/24 at 10:39 AM an abbreviated tour of the environment was conducted with the maintenance director (staff #10). In the 3A central bathing room he confirmed some trash, and a broom was in a dirty nonfunctioning electronic jet tub, One of the 3 shower stalls was without a light, and in another shower stall, water was puddled in 2 areas. In the stall with the inoperable bathing tub were several holes punctured through the wallboard into the hollowness behind the wallboard. The wall on the left side upon entering the bathing room was shown to have a approximate 4 foot by 5 foot unfinished repair with noted white spackle and some scrapes and dings into the unpainted spackle. The maintenance director was unaware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident's representative in writing of the bed-hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (R#118, R#12) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The bed-hold policy describes the facility's policy of holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. 1) On 2/21/24 at 12:56 PM during the initial rounds on the unit, Resident #118 revealed that s/he was sent out to the hospital late last year for a medical condition. Resident was asked if s/he was provided a notification for a bed hold prior to hospitalization and s/he stated they were unsure. A review of Resident #118's medical records on 3/5/24 at 2:11 PM revealed a nurse progress noted dated 11/24/23 which documented that resident was sent out to the hospital on November 2023 for a medical condition. On 3/6/24 at 10:10 AM a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice as evidenced by 1) failing to ensure nursing staff documenting opioid use on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Controlled Drug Administration Record (also known as control sheet). This was evident for 2 (Resident #88 and #124) out of 3 residents reviewed for administration of narcotic medication, and 2) failing to ensure that a licensed nurse had specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for a dialysis resident. This was evident during a review of a complaint incident during an annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 02/22/24 at 9:10 AM review of a complaint intake MD00200471 had that an arterial needle and clamp was left in Resident #82's dialysis access point prior to discharging resident from the dialysis session on 11/30/23. Further this was not discovered by the nurse until more than 2 hours later when the resident was found bleeding from the access site with the needle and clamp pulled out. Review of the nurses note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) to maintain safety by allowing the bed of a resident at risk for fall to be in the up position when care was not being provided thereby placing resident at high risk for injury. This was evident for 1 (#51) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents; 2) to assess residents' fall risk after the fall incident occurred. This was evident of 1 (Resident #98) out of 6 residents reviewed for falls; 3) ensure resident's outside consult appointment had follow-up. This was evident for 1 (Resident #292) out of 67 residents reviewed for following appointments during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/5/24 at 8:52 AM the surveyor observed Resident #51 in bed, fast asleep. The resident's bed was elevated up to about 3 feet high, there was no one in the room and no sign that care was being rendered at the time. Review of the resident's care plan with a completion date of 1/22/24 on 3/5/24 at 9:00 AM revealed that resident had a care plan for fall related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for the care of a resident with a urostomy upon admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) of 1 resident reviewed for urostomy care during the survey. The findings include: Urostomy is a result of a surgery that creates a way for urine to leave your body in cases where your bladder is damaged or removed. During an interview with Resident #88 on 2/21/24 at 10:52 AM, the resident said, I was diagnosed with bladder cancer in 2022. Since then, I had a bag for urine. Also, the resident stated that the facility nurses did not empty, monitor, and assess his/her urostomy. A review of Resident #88's medical record on 2/27/24 at 8:20 AM revealed that the resident had an order to change urostomy per physician order within 24 hours as needed and change catheter tubing and bag for malfunction, contamination, odor or sedimentation as needed. However, there was no order and documentation for urostomy care, including monitoring and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide required care to the residents' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) sites. This was evident for 1 (Resident #290) out of 2 residents reviewed for PEG site management during the survey. The findings include: A PEG is a tube that is inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach. It is used to provide nutrition and medication to a resident. The routine care of a PEG tube site must include the regular monitoring and cleaning of the insertion site to prevent skin break down, leakage, and infections. Review on 3/11/24 at 3:23 PM of Resident #290's closed record found that he/she was admitted in March 2022 with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction, dysphagia with PEG tube placement, and dementia. However, on 3/11/24 at 3:53 PM, review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from 3/24/22 through 10/22/23, revealed that the PEG site care was not included in the TAR form and subsequently there was no evidence that the PEG site care had been completed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to place a physician's order for the indication of Oxygen administration and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan with resident-centered goals for respiratory care to include oxygen therapy. This was evident for 1 (Resident #302) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care during the survey. The findings include: On 2/22/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #302 had a settled Oxygen nasal cannula 4L (liter) prepped at the bedside. However, Resident #302 did not apply Oxygen. Further observation Resident #302 on 2/28/24 at 10:03 AM, the resident had 2 L of Oxygen via nasal cannula. A record review of Resident #302's medical record on 2/28/24 at 10:20 AM revealed that the resident had an order of Oxygen via Nasal Cannula at 2 Liter started on 2/27/24. However, the order did not indicate why the resident needed Oxygen therapy. Also, no care plan was developed for Resident #302 ' s Oxygen therapy. On 2/28/24 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the nurse failed to do a timely assessment on a resident post dialysis, this was evident during a review of a complaint MD00200471 during the survey. The findings include: On 02/22/24 at 9:10 AM review of a complaint MD00200471 alleged that Resident #82 was not assessed immediately upon return to the unit from dialysis and that it took an hour before an assessment was completed. Review of the nurse note documented on 11/29/23 that resident returned back to unit from dialysis at 12pm. Nurse obtained blood pressure at 12:48pm on pt. (patient) right arm and administered pt. medication at 12:49. GNA took pt to room to assist pt back in bed to be changed and setup for lunch at 12:51pm Review on 3/4/24 at 11:55AM of the nurses note dated 11/29/23 documented that the nurse found Resident #82's Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) a connection between an artery and vein for dialysis access bleeding out at 2:30 PM while doing rounds. A needle and a white clamp were found on the resident's lap in bed. The bleeding was controlled, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse was competent to care for a dialysis resident. This was evident during a review of a complaint incident MD00200471 during an the survey. The findings include: On 02/22/24 at 9:10 AM review of a complaint intake MD00200471, alleged that an arterial needle and clamp was left in Resident #82's dialysis access point prior to discharging resident from the dialysis session on 11/30/23. Further this was not discovered until more than 2 hours later when the resident was found bleeding from the access site with the needle and clamp pulled out. Review on 3/4/24 at 11:55AM of the nurses note dated 11/29/23 documented that the nurse found Resident #82's Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) a connection between an artery and vein for dialysis access bleeding out at 2:30 PM while doing rounds. A needle and a white clamp were found on the resident's lap at the bedside. The bleeding was controlled, the physician was notified and follow up interventions implemented. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to monitor and/or document the resident's inappropriate behavior related to mental health. This was evident for 1 (Resident #24) of 5 residents who were reviewed for behavioral-emotional issues during the survey. The findings include: A review of the facility's self-report regarding Resident #24 on 3/06/24 at 9:26 AM revealed that the resident had inappropriate behavior, such as entering other resident's rooms, taking their food, and hitting them in June 2023. Further record review for Resident #24 revealed that the Psychologist had followed the resident regularly and as needed after the incident. The Psychologist ordered that Resident #24 be monitored for mood/sleep/appetite/behavior and documented. A review of Resident #24's medical records on 3/06/24 at 10:00 AM revealed that the resident had orders of monitoring inappropriate behaviors but not limited to wandering, disturbed mood, smearing feces on items throughout their room, getting in other residents' beds, eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to ensure narcotics removed from the resident's supply were administered to the resident, as evidenced by staff documenting the removal of narcotics without documentation of the need for the narcotic or documentation that the narcotic was administered to the resident. This was evident for 3 (#88 and #124) of 3 residents reviewed for Controlled drug administration and medication administration records reviewed during the survey, and 2) failed to timely provide medication to meet the needs of the residents. This was evident for 1 (#116) of 5 residents reviewed for medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Oxycodone hydrochloride is part of a group of drugs known as opioids. Opioids include any drug that acts on opioid receptors in the brain and any natural or synthetic drugs that are derived from or related to the opium poppy. Tramadol is a strong pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow physician orders by administering as needed (PRN) pain medication outside the prescribed parameters. By failing to follow the prescribed parameters for the medication administration, the resident was given an unnecessary medication. This was identified for 2 (#116, #57) of 67 residents reviewed for medications during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/26/2024 at 8:08 AM, review of Resident #116's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with medical diagnosis that include but not limited to: Non-pressure chronic ulcer of right heel and midfoot with necrosis of muscle, pain in right hand, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and Atrial Fibrillation. On 2/26/2024 at 8:20 AM, review of physician orders revealed an active order with a start date of 11/15/2023, for Oxycodone tablet 15 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain 5-10. Further review of the orders revealed a discontinued order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to implement a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident receiving a psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for psychiatric medications during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 2/28/24 at 10:45AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #37 which revealed the following information in their active medical order: Seroquel oral tablet 25mg, Give one tablet by mouth two times a day. On 2/28/24 at 11:04AM the surveyor reviewed the psychiatry note dated 2/21/24 for Resident #37 which revealed the following information: Current Psychiatric Medications: Quetiapine 25 mg po (by mouth) bid (twice per day.) Decreased from 37.5mg bid to 25mg bid on 2/25/23. GDR Seroquel 25mg po qd (every day) 2/21/24. Upon further review of the note dated 2/21/24 the following recommendation had been made by Staff #61, Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP-PMH): GDR of Seroquel is clinically indicated at this time due to improvement in mood and behaviors.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to remove expired medications and properly store medications. This was evident found on 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 3 medication cart, and 1 medication cart left unattended by nursing staff. The findings include: The surveyor observed a refrigerator in the medication storage room at unit 3 B on 2/26/24 at 10:18 AM with attending Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #4). The surveyor found 2 bags of 100ml (milli-litter) Intravenous Ertapenem (antibiotic medication) in the refrigerator. The bags had labeled with used by 2/15/24. The LPN #4 verified that the medications were expired. On 2/26/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed 3A unit medication cart with LPN #5. The surveyor noticed that unlabeled med cup with 11 unidentifiable pills located in the 1st drawer of 3A unit med cart. LPN #5 said, these are for Resident #40. She/he just reported having upset stomach, I wanted to hold them at this point. LPN #5 was asked was there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received needed dental services. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 2 residents reviewed for dental services during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 2/21/24 at 10:42 AM in an observation and interview with Resident #101, the surveyor observed that the resident did not have any teeth. During the interview the resident explained that follow-up with a dentist regarding dentures was supposed to have happened in September 2023 but had not happened yet. On 3/05/24 at 9:58 AM a review of Resident #101's medical records revealed documentation dated 7/26/23 that the resident had a dental visit with impressions made for dentures, and that a follow up was to be done on 8/15/23. No documentation of any follow-up was found in the record. On 3/05/24 at 10:15 am in an interview with the Unit Manager (Staff #12), she said that there has been a problem with the company that provided dental services, and that the resident was scheduled to have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure certification for medical ineffectiveness of treatment documentation was complete (Resident #102), and 2.) ensure the accuracy of a medical order (Resident #39). This was evident for one out of one certification of medical ineffectiveness of treatment form reviewed by the surveyor, and one out of one medical order for insulin reviewed by the surveyor. The findings include: 1.) On 2/21/24 at 2:17PM the surveyor observed a form located in the paper chart for Resident #102 which provided certification from two providers regarding the medical ineffectiveness of treatment for the resident. Upon review of this form, it was found that the first certification documented by Staff #43, Physician, failed to identify what treatment(s) were being certified to be medically ineffective. On 2/26/24 at 11:20AM the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing who reported Staff #43 was an attending physician for the facility until July 2023, and provided their contact information.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the proper information for residents who received hospice services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/05/24 at 2:10 PM a review of Resident #47's electronic medical record revealed an order to admit the resident to hospice services on 5/18/23. No hospice documentation was found in the electronic medical record. On 3/06/24 at 11:29 AM a review of Resident #47's paper chart revealed that there was no Hospice Certification or Recertification forms, no hospice election form, and no hospice plan of care in the resident's record. On 3/06/24 at 12:01 PM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she was asked where the hospice certification, election form, and hospice plan of care could be found. The DON said that the hospice documentation should be in the resident's paper chart, and that she would look for these documents.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed: 1) to maintain 2 bathtubs in operating condition. This was evident during environmental rounds of the facility for 2 of 2 bathtubs found out of 4 observed bathing areas of the facility; 2) ensure lift equipment utilized for resident care was maintained in a safe condition for use. This was evident for 2 out of 2 lift devices observed during the survey. The findings include. 1. Environmental observations conducted on 3/5/24 at 2:26 PM in the 3A central bathing room found The Bather 2001 electronic jet tub with trash and a broom in the dirty tub. The tub was not in working condition. Observation of the 2A central bathing room found The bather 2001 in non-working order. On 3/8/24 at 10:39 AM the maintenance director (staff #10) confirmed the dirty non-operational electronic jet tub in the 3A central bathing room and per discussion he indicated that both electronic jet tubs did not work. On 3/12/24 at 3:45 PM, a concern related to the in operational tubs in the 3A and 2A central bathing rooms was shared with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for new and existing staff. This was evident for Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #50) and Registered Nurse (RN #53) of 8 employees' training records reviewed during this recertification survey. The findings include: 1) The surveyor review of staff training records on 3/13/24 at 11:05 AM revealed that GNA #50 was hired on 12/20/23, and the GNA facility orientation form (a checklist for care areas like resident care, mobility, devices, vital signs, infection control, others, and documentation with the completed date and observed person's signature) filled out on 1/08/24. However, the review revealed that some skilled areas did not have the completed date and signatures of the observed person. The blank session included, but was not limited to, nail care, suprapubic care, ostomy care, wheelchair seatbelt, lap buddy, side rails, temperature, feeding, meal set up, encouraging fluid intakes, thick liquids, intake/output, care of enteral residents, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee file documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process to ensure all Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) have no less than 12 hours of education per year, and the education included annual dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. This is evident for 1 (GNA #52) of 5 GNA employment files reviewed during this recertificate survey. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed randomly selected 5 GNAs employee files on 3/13/24 at 11:05 AM. The review revealed that GNA #52 was hired in October 2021. The file contained the staff who received training upon hire in 2023. However, there were no annual training records, including dementia management and resident abuse prevention, in 2022. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/13/24 at 1:32 PM, the DON stated that the corporate office would assign employees' annual training through a computer-based training program and in-person training provided as needed. The surveyor shared GNA #52' s training records with the DON. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident's need and preferences. This was evident for 1 (R#33) of 5 residents reviewed for personal property during the survey. The findings include: On 3/8/24 at 1:02 PM review of the investigative report of a facility reported incident MD00200936 revealed that Resident #33 reported to the unit manager that s/he lost $57 dollars left on their bedside table. This incident was investigated by the facility and was not substantiated. The facility report had that Resident #33 was provided a key to their nightstand for safekeeping of their belongings. In an interview with Resident #33 on 3/11/24 at 12:29 PM, the resident was asked about the incident. S/he stated that the money was left on their table before they fell asleep, was gone before they woke up, Resident was asked why s/he left the money on the bedside table. Resident #33 explained that their nightstand did not have a lock. Resident stated further that the facility administrator was yet to provide a key…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility self-report investigation records, observation, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide a safe/secure storage space for resident's personal belongings. This was evident for 1 (Resident #279) out of 16 residents reviewed for facility self-reported incidents. The findings include: Record review, on 03/04/24 at 9:20 AM, revealed that Resident #279 had complained on 07/25/23 to the Staff #12 who filled out a Resident Concern Form. In this complaint, the resident stated that he/she expected to be reimbursed $2,332 for missing or damaged items. Further review of the facility self-report investigation of the resident's allegation found that it could not be clarified whether and how the resident's personal belongings went missing or were damaged. Observation, on 3/4/24 at 12:20 PM, of a storage room for residents' personal belongings on the second floor across from the nursing station found the following: multiple large black trash bags on the floor and multiple boxes stocked in piles holding residents' belongings. Some of the boxes were open and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to timely report an allegation of abuse/harassment and resident elopement to the State Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. This was evident for 2 (Resident #279 and Resident 392) out of 2 residents reviewed for elopement and abuse during survey. The findings include: 1. On 3/4/24 at 12:46PM the surveyor reviewed the facility's self-report form sent to the Office of Health Care Quality for an incident which occurred on 1/26/22 regarding Resident #92. The self-report form indicated Staff #59, Executive Director, Nursing Home Administrator, received a call on 1/26/22 at approximately 5:45PM from the hospital regarding the resident having been found by EMS walking in the facility neighborhood and was brought to the emergency room. The surveyor noted the time on the self report form dated 1/26/22 was documented as 8:17PM, and it was documented that local law enforcement was contacted at 8:17PM. On 3/4/24 at 12:46PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of: 1.) misappropriation of resident property, and 2.) elopement. This was evident 2 out of 4 residents reviewed for personal property (Resident #116 and Resident #99) and 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #92) during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/26/2024 at 11:05 AM, review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), MD00196890, revealed that Resident #116 reported on 9/12/2023 missing a $100 bill from a pair of joggers. The facility initiated an investigation and did not determine misappropriation of property. Further review of the facility investigation report of the incident revealed that there were witness statements from staff and the resident's roommate. However, review of interview statements dated 9/19/2023 did not indicate the titles nor identify the persons completing the forms. The interview statement of the resident's roommate was not signed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to provide correct notice to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility and to provide sufficient skilled rehabilitation treatment, and to assure the safe discharge of a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #282) out of 1 resident reviewed for proper notice of stay and safe discharge during the survey. The findings include: Review on 3/12/24 at 11:00 AM, of Resident #282's closed record found that the resident was a skilled admission on [DATE] to the facility and Physician Staff #35 ordered the skilled rehabilitation therapy four times per week for 12 weeks including allowing time for caregiver education and discharge planning and dialysis treatments. Further review found that the resident's discharge was improperly planned, as evidenced by: a) Review on 3/12/24 at 1:23 PM, of social service notes, dated 7/11/23 at 5:11 PM, revealed that social worker staff #36 issued the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure physician ordered wound treatments are performed and receive timely wound consultation and 2) provide accurate ongoing assessment of skin and wounds and receive timely wound consultation. This was evident for 2 ( #295, #293) out of 10 residents reviewed for wounds during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #295's closed medical record was reviewed on 2/27/24, in relation to MD00192462, MD00192745, and MD00193830. Resident #295 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Skin and wound record dated 4/7/23 revealed that the facility staff identified a pressure injury on the resident buttock. Documentation revealed that the resident's attending physician was notified and indicated treatment to clean left buttocks wound with wound cleanser, dry apply bacitracin daily till healed. Review of the April 2023 treatment administration record did not show that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's care was directed by a physician. This was evident for 1 facility reported incident (MD00203534) of 27 facility reported incidents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/13/24 at 9:15 am a review of the facility reported incident MD00203534 revealed that Resident #71 went on a leave of absence (LOA) on 3/02/24 and returned later that same day. A review of the resident's medical record revealed documentation that confirmed the resident left the faciity on 3/02/24 and returned to the facility later the same day. Further review of the resident record revealed that there was no order for the resident's leave of absence on 3/02/24. On 3/14/24 at 10:55 am an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. When asked if she could locate the physician's order for the LOA on 3/02/24 she explained that the resident had an order to go on a LOA on 3/01/24 but the resident did not go that day. The DON explained that there was a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a cord used to turn on/off a call light was attached to the call system. This was evident for 3 of 5 call lights in the 3A central bathing room. The findings include: On 3/5/24 at 2:26 PM observations of the 3A central bathing room revealed that 2 of 3 shower stalls did not have a cord attached to the call switch wall panel. The call switch wall panel for the toilet did not have an attached cord. The call system should be accessible to a resident lying on the floor and without a cord that reaches the floor a resident would not be able to access the call system. On 03/08/24 at 10:39 AM, the maintenance director (staff #10) confirmed the findings with the surveyor of call cords not attached to the 3 of the 5 call switch wall panels in the 3A central bathing room. On 03/11/24 at 1:30 PM the nursing home administrator was informed of the observations made with the maintenance director of the call system that lack cords to the shower room floor in the 3A central shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#36 and #50) with showers and failed to provide Resident (#63) with food preferences. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents selected for review of choices during the survey process and 3 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident #36. Surveyor interview with Resident #36 on 3/14/19 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident is not provided showers, but only bed baths. Review of facility staff documentation revealed the facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident #36 on: 2/20/19, 2/23/19, 2/27/19, 3/2/19, 3/6/19, 3/9/19, 3/13/19 and 3/16/19. It is the expectation residents be provided showers at least 2 times a week unless medically contraindicated. Review of the medical record also failed to reveal any evidence of Resident #36 refusing showers. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 3/21/19 at 1:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide showers to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Residents (#44, #90, #118 and #326) with care that promoted the highest practicable well-being. This was evident for 4 of 47 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to apply a wet to dry dressing to surgical wound on back as ordered for Resident #44. Medical record review for Resident #44 revealed on 02/27/19 the physician ordered: Wound to back - clean with wound cleanser. Pat dry and apply wet to dry dressing. Cover with tegaderm film. Change two times a day. Surveyor interview of the resident on 03/15/19 at 12:29 PM revealed the resident 's commented that his/her wound on his/her back was supposed to have a dressing change twice a day and sometimes, the wound dressing is only changed one time a day. Further medical record review revealed the treatment record failed to demonstrate that the surgical wound dressing was changed twice a day: a. on 3/5/19 the evening shift dressing change was not completed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication for Residents (#63 and #90). This was evident for 2 of 2 resident selected for pain assessment and 2 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. 1. Medical record review for Resident #63 revealed on 7/9/18 the physician ordered: Oxycodone 5 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain level 6-10. Oxycodone is a strong narcotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to hold blood pressure medication for Resident (#34 and #123) when the documented blood pressure was below the set parameter as ordered by the physician, failed to document the heart rate and blood pressure for Resident (#36) when the physician ordered parameters, and failed to document the use of a medication (#274). This was evident for 4 of 6 residents selected for un-necessary medication review and 4 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to hold blood pressure medication for Resident (#34) when the documented blood pressure was below the set parameter as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed on 12/4/18 the physician ordered: Coreg 25 milligrams by mouth 2 times a day, hold for systolic blood pressure (top number) less than 110 or heart rate less than 60. Coreg is used for treating high blood pressure. Coreg reduces the heart's rate and force of contraction and thereby…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#54) with the most dignified existence, failed to honor a resident's right to explore living arrangements in the community (#61), and failed to promote and enhance a resident's dignity and rights by obtaining weights and blood pressures on Resident (#174). This was evident for 3 out of 3 residents investigated for dignity during the survey process and 3 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to feed Resident #54 in a timely manner. Surveyor observation of Resident #54's lunch on 3/14/19 at 12:23 PM revealed the resident's lunch was in the room, sitting on the over-bed table. Further observation revealed the facility staff failed to feed the resident until 12:33 PM (at least 10 minutes after the tray had been sitting in the room) and the facility staff failed to re-heat the resident's lunch per surveyor's observations. 1 B. The facility staff failed to feed the resident in the most dignified manner.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment accurately reflected a resident's status (#100). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they require. Resident #100's MDS' transmitted to the state on 2/23/19, 11/23/18, and 8/23/18 reflect Resident #100's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as a score of 15/15 which means alert and oriented to person, place and time, with no impairment. On 3/13/19 at 11:00 AM during the initial interview Resident #100 could answer most of this surveyor's questions but had to be prompted and many questions clarified before she could understand what was being asked. A second review on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident (#61, #274, and #123). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for presence of a urinary catheter and 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a written guideline of care based on the individual resident's needs developed by an interdisciplinary team which includes nursing, rehabilitation staff, and dietary that communicates to other health care professionals. A written care plan decreases the risk of incomplete, incorrect or inaccurate care. 1. During an interview with Staff #8 on 3/18/19 at 9:00 AM it was revealed that Resident #61 empties his/her urinary catheter device bag when filled with urine and changes the bag without the assistance of the facility staff. Review of Resident #61's care plans revealed no care plan that showed Resident #61 was capable of caring for their urinary catheter nor was doing the required tasks. On 3/18/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly review dental recommendations for Resident (#36) and act upon those recommendations. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for dental review and 1 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #36 was seen by the dentist on 12/18/18. At that time, the dentist assessed the resident and determined Resident #36 had poor teeth condition and heavy plaque buildup. Tartar/plaque is a yellow or brown colored deposit that forms when plaque hardens on your teeth. Tartar forms below and above the gum line. It is rough and porous and can lead to receding gums and gum disease. At that time, the dentist stated Resident #36 would benefit from Peridex and consult with physician. Peridex Mouthwash. Peridex is a medication used along with regular tooth brushing/flossing to treat gingivitis, a gum disease that causes red, swollen, and easily bleeding gums. Peridex oral rinse to treat gingivitis, to help reduce the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide services that would allow resident the ability to achieve the greatest independence with performing Activities of Daily Living to Resident (#63). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for review of ADL during the survey process and 1 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Activities of daily living are routine activities people do every day without assistance. There are six basic ADLs: eating, bathing, getting dressed, toileting, transferring and continence. It is the expectation the facility staff will provide dietary assistance to residents; cut food up, open milk and juice containers, butter breads and ensure the food is within reach to the resident. Surveyor observation of Resident 63's lunch on 3/19/19 at 1:00 PM revealed the resident in bed; however, the resident was noted to be positioned in low fowlers position, approximately elevated 30 degrees. The Semi-Fowler's position is a position in which a patient, typically in a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to implement protective measures to prevent a sacral pressure ulcer (#274) from occurring. This was evident for 1 of 6 resident's selected for review of pressure ulcers during the annual survey. A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). The findings included: Resident #274 was admitted from the hospital without a pressure ulcer in the sacral (coccyx) area according to the 1/17/19 nursing admission evaluation. On 2/28/19 Resident #274 developed a Stage 1 reddened area on the sacrum which progressed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication pass and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain an environment free from potential accidents for Resident (#19). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication observation and 1 of 27 opportunities for error. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed on 3/1/19 the physician ordered: Humalog 5 units SQ (subcutaneous) with meals for diabetes. Humalog (a fast-acting insulin) works to manage blood sugar and may help keep the sugar levels in balance. Humalog should be taken within 15 minutes before eating or right after eating a meal. A subcutaneous injection is administered into the layer of skin directly below the dermis and epidermis, collectively referred to as the cutis. Subcutaneous injections are highly effective in administering medications such as insulin. Observation of medication pass on 3/18/19 at 8:20 AM revealed the facility staff nurse #13 drew the insulin up from the bottle; however, the nurse failed to slide the protective shield down to cover and protect the needle.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to adequately use Provale cups for Resident (#36) with as ordered. This was evident for 1 of 8 residents selected for review of Nutrition during the annual survey process and 1 of 47 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The finding includes: Medical record review revealed on 2/25/19 the physician ordered: 5 cc blue lid Provale cup on all trays. Provale cups are designed to deliver small swallows (specific predetermined volume of thin liquid in a normal drinking motion. Prevents over delivery and promotes safer swallowing and more independence. Use one or two easy-grip removable handles. Separate chamber inside delivers the specific volume in each mouthful without the need to suck. Plastic. Clear base. Comes apart easily and is dishwasher safe. Available in 5cc or 10cc delivery. Surveyor observation of the resident's breakfast trays on 3/14/19 at 8:20 AM and 3/18/19 at 8:40 AM revealed the facility staff supplied the resident with the blue lid Provale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the physician staff provided contradictory medical information concerning a resident's end of life wishes (#84). This is evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12-28-18 Resident #84 was admitted to the facility with dementia. On admission Physician #2 completed a MOLST (Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) document with Resident #84. The MOLST is a portable and enduring medical order covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a resident's or a Medical Power of Attorney's wishes about medical treatments. Physician #2, with the resident, made the complex medical decision to do CPR if Resident #84's heart stops. The MOLST was originally dated 12-28-18 and changed to 12-26-18. At the same time on 12-28-18 Physician #2 completed a Physician's Certification of Incapacity To Make an Informed Decision form stating Resident #84 incapable of making complex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews it was determined that the facility's pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in Resident #326's drug regimen. This was evident for 1 (#326) of 10 residents whose medications were reviewed. The findings include: On 3/18/2019 medical record review for Resident #326 revealed a physician order dated 3/2/19 for the medication Propranolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure.) The order indicated to hold (do not administer) the medication if the resident's Systolic Blood Pressure was (SBP) was greater than (>) 110. However, review of the resident's Medication Administration Record for March 2019 showed that the medication was administered when SBP was greater than 110. In addition, a review of the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (Staff #15) medication regimen review for Resident # 326 indicated that there were No Irregularities found regarding the order or the administration of the medication. The findings were discussed with the Regional Clinical Service Manager (Staff #11) on 3/18/2019 at 10:06 AM who acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the initial tour of the kitchen and garbage disposal area, it was determined that facility staff failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings include: An observation of the facility's dumpster/trash disposal area was conducted on 3/13/2019 at 8:00 AM. Various debris including discarded gloves, plastic spoons and cups were observed on the ground beside the dumpster. Garbage and refuse should be disposed of properly to prevent harborage and feeding of pests. The findings were acknowledged by the Food Service Manager (Staff #14) at 8:15 AM.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record in the most complete and accurate form for Residents (#22, #46 and #123). This was evident for 3 of 47 residents selected for medical record review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A medical record is simply a record of a resident's health and medical history. Consistent, current and complete documentation in the medical record is an essential component of quality resident care. 1. The facility staff failed to document the administration of a medication for Resident #22. Medical record review for Resident #22 revealed on 2/26/19 the physician ordered: Oxycodone 10 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain. Oxycodone is used to relieve pain severe enough to require opioid treatment and when other pain medicines did not work well enough or cannot be tolerated. It belongs to the group of medicines called narcotic analgesics (pain medicines). Oxycodone acts on the central nervous system (CNS) to relieve pain. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently post the nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift, the ratio of licensed and unlicensed staff to residents, and failed to retain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. This was evident on 4 of 4 nursing units and in the facility lobby during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include. 1. On 3/8/2024 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor requested from the Director of Nursing (DON) copies of the daily assignment sheets for the past three (3) months (December 2023 through February 2024). On 3/8/2024 at 1:02 PM, review of the Daily Assignment sheets for 3B Unit was completed for the month of December 2023. Random review of the daily assignment sheets to exemplify the missing data follows: On 12/1/2023 on Unit 3B (census 38): for 3-11 P (evening shift) 3 nurses (no title) and 1 supervisor (no title). For 11- 7 (night shift) 2 nurses (no title). On 12/2/2023 on Unit 3B (census 39): for 3-11 (evening) and 11-7 (night)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,042 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,042 — penalty dated 2024-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE LIFE OPER 2011 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2011
CARLYN ALEXANDRA ATTMAN 2005 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2011
GABINIA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2011
SARAH ROSE ATTMAN 2005 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2011
GUNTHORPE, JAHIRIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/03/2018
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2011
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2011
SPADARO, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/05/2013
FC OF HARFORD ROAD INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2011
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2011

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 13%Other / private 87%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,070per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215253. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next