Future Care Old Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 266 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 137.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0944 — pattern
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff received ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. This deficient practice was evident for 4 of 5 employee files reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 03/13/2026 at 10:45 AM, a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #4, GNA #13, GNA #14 and GNA #15 employee files failed to show evidence of ongoing QAPI training following initial hire. The GNA hire dates ranged from 2010 through 2025, indicating continued employment without documented QAPI training.During an interview on 03/13/2026, with the Administrator, the surveyor inquired about the facility's QAPI training for staff. The Administrator stated the facility conducts performance improvement town hall meetings; however, the meetings do not include required ongoing QAPI training. The surveyor informed the Administrator of the missing QAPI training for GNA #4, GNA #13, GNA #14 and GNA #15.On 03/17/2026 at 9:27 AM, the Administrator acknowledged that ongoing QAPI training had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to a keep a sanitary environment in the kitchen. This was evident during the initial observation of the kitchen during the annual re-certification survey. The findings include: Observation on 03/10/2026 at 8:05 AM: During the initial tour of the kitchen with Staff #9, the Dietary Manager, the following conditions were observed: At least five torn areas on the floor were noted, with the underlying red brick exposed. In the dishwashing area, the floor was torn in several places, and the red brick underneath was exposed. A rusted bait trap was observed under the triple sink. Chipped flooring was noted in the corner by the walk-in freezer and the walk-in refrigerator. The baseboard was detached from the walls in the dishwasher area. The baseboard behind the ice machine was chipped and detached from the wall separating the walk-in freezer and walk-in refrigerator. The ceiling above the walk-in refrigerator, adjacent to the ice machine, showed peeling with visible light-colored large pieces…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the kitchen tour and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that stored food items were properly labeled and dated. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The Findings Include: On 12/04/24 at 07:45 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (Staff#10), the following deficiencies were observed: 1. The walk-in refrigerator revealed a stand-alone plastic bag of chicken breast, approximately 20 frozen pieces, and a plastic bag of link sausages that did not have labels and were not dated. 2. A bottle of honey was found in the dry storage area with a prep date of 11/26/2024 and a used date of 12/03/2024. Staff #10 stated, honey is good for 3 years. 3. The dry food section had a container of graham crackers in individual packets that were not dated. An original box of graham crackers had a date. However, there was no way to identify which box the individual crackers came from. 4. Two of one gallon bottles of Cattlemen's BBQ Sauce: one had a sticker label with prep on 11/30/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and administrative record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide all geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) with the required annual dementia training. This deficient practice was evident for 32 out of 43 GNA's reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 12/09/2024 at 8:59 AM, review of employee records for GNA #27, GNA #28, GNA #29, and GNA #31 failed to show evidence of required annual dementia training. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 on 12/09/24 at 10:43 AM she explained that annual competency for GNA includes a skills fair. The fair covers education on dementia care, abuse prevention and reporting, resident rights, infection control, and additional in-services to address any concerns that may have arisen during the year. The DON #2 reported that the most recent skills fair was held on 6/27/24. On 12/9/24 at 11:48 AM, a review of the in-service dementia training provided during the GNA annual skills fair, compared to the facility's current list of active GNA's, revealed that only 11 out of 43 employees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity while assisting residents with meals. This was evident for 1 (Resident #283) of 1 resident observed being fed by staff. The findings include: On 12/10/24 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA, Staff #46) standing over Resident #283 when feeding the resident. On 12/10/24 at 1:06 PM, an interview with agency GNA #46 revealed that she was agency staff and she was not aware that staff should not stand when feeding residents. On 12/11/24 at 8:43 AM, an interview with agency GNA (Staff #45) revealed that she was agency staff and she was not aware that staff should not stand when feeding residents. On 12/11/24 at 12:43 PM, an interview with the Staffing Coordinator (Staff #22) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA, Staff #1) revealed that agency GNAs are not educated on maintaining resident dignity pertaining to feeding upon working at the facility. Staff #22 indicated that GNA's are educated on such skills in school to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on reviews of a facility reported incident, interviews, and record review, it was determined that a staff member had removed money from a resident's account without permission. This was evident for 1 of 36 facility reported incidents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: On 12/06/2024 at 12:09 PM, a review of the facility-reported incident, MD00183120, reported on 11/16/2022, revealed an allegation of misappropriation of funds. Resident #23 reported that she/he did not have his/her checkbook. Resident #23's daughter reported that two checks had cleared Resident #23's account, one for $600 and another for $400. Resident #23's bank confirmed that the name on the two checks was Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #32. The facility confirmed that GNA#32 worked as an agency GNA on 11/16/2022 on 7-3 and 3-11 shifts. The investigation conducted by the facility determined that two checks totaling $1000 were written to GNA #32 and were cashed. Resident #23's bank blocked her/his account and reimbursed Resident #23. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation of abuse was made. This was evident for 2 (Resident #34 and #147) out of 15 residents investigated for abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/5/2024 at 1:45PM, the Surveyor reported an allegation of abuse which involved Resident #34 to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) #1. On 12/6/2024 at 11:38AM, the NHA #1 provided the Surveyor with the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) initial report form for the abuse investigation. During a review of the FRI document, the Surveyor discovered that the report was completed on 12/6/2024 at 9:45AM and not within the two-hour timeframe. During an interview with NHA #1 and Regional Nurse #3 on 12//6/2024 at 1:40PM, the Surveyor confirmed that the FRI initial report form was not completed within the two-hour timeframe of the abuse allegation. 2) On 12.06.24 at 2:00 PM the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #103) out of 61 residents reviewed during survey. The findings include: A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage a resident's care. On 12/9/2024 at 7:00AM, during an interview with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #55, the Surveyor was informed that residents are scheduled to have two showers a week and showers are usually given during the 7AM-3PM shift or 3PM-11PM shift. During review of Resident #103's task care report for November 2024 and December 2024 on 12/9/2024 at 1:30PM, the Surveyor discovered a GNA task for showers/tub bath on Mondays and Thursdays during the 3pm-11pm shift. Further review revealed documentation of N, the resident did not receive a shower or RR, the resident refused a shower on Mondays and Thursdays from November through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to facilitate timely care plan meetings after a resident's quarterly assessment to allow the resident and resident representative to participate in the care planning process. This was evident for 1 (Resident #48) out of 2 residents investigated for care planning during the survey. The findings include: Interdisciplinary team (IDT) is a team of medical professionals that provide specific patient centered care to the residents within a facility. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs. A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary Range of Motion (ROM) exercises for a resident in the functional maintenance program. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) out of the 5 residents reviewed for mobility during the survey. The findings include: A functional maintenance program (FMP) is a set of activities designed to help residents maintain or improve their functional abilities, including range of motion (ROM), after therapy. The program aims to maintain the strength, independence, and functionality gained during therapy and prevent or slow further decline in function. On 12/04/24 at 08:09 AM, during an interview with Resident #11, she/he stated that staff did not provide ROM exercises to his/her wrist and hands. The resident had a history of multiple sclerosis with contractures (permanent restriction to the ROM of a joint). On 12/09/24 at 09:15 AM, the restorative aide (staff # 23) was interviewed. She explained that her job as a restorative aide is to carry out the orders written by the Physical Therapist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD