No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Future Care Northpoint

1046 Old North Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21224 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (410) 282-0100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 282-0100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6730 Holabird Ave · (410) 288-6226 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6510 Odonnell St · (410) 633-5050 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1000 Dundalk Ave · (410) 633-4004 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6000 Eastern Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6616 Graceland Ave · (410) 633-0315

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.6%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.8%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.5%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.3%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.4%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.1%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.351.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.811.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 489 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 178 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.5%CMS range 52.4–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 8.6–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 6.7–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
40.1%
Total nursing turnover
25.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 143.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, administrative and medical record reviews, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff followed the infection control processes related to the hanging of the nephrostomy tube bag off the floor. This was evident to be true for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents observed with urinary drainage bags during a complaint survey. The findings include:A nephrostomy bag is a drainage bag that collects urine directly from the kidney through a tube to outside of the body.On 10/23/2025 at 08:00 AM the surveyor initiated a tour of the 2nd floor clinical unit. Breakfast trays were being served at that time. At 08:15 AM the surveyor observed resident #1 in room [ROOM NUMBER] in bed by the door. The surveyor observed two bags containing urine on the left side of the bed, bag A was a foley catheter bag cover in place, bag B was the nephrostomy bag lying on top of a white towel folded on the floor mat to the left of the bed. At 08:20 AM the surveyor observed LPN # 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, review of the medical record, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that advance directives were discussed with residents and/or responsible representatives and ensure that a current copy of residents' advanced directives were in the residents' medical record. This was evident for 6 (Resident #130, #74, #47, #20, #189, and #95) out of 47 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: An advance directive is a legal document outlining a person's wishes for medical care should they become unable to make decisions for themselves because of illness, injury, or incapacity. It allows individuals to specify their preferences for treatment, including life-sustaining measures, and to appoint a healthcare agent to make decisions on their behalf. Essentially, it is a way to ensure your healthcare preferences are followed, even when you cannot communicate them directly. On 6/16/25 at 11:55 AM review of Resident #74's medical record failed to reveal an advance directive. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment as evidenced by a heavily soiled privacy curtain. This was evident for 1 (Resident #67) of 7 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 6/23/25 at 9:08 AM in an interview with Resident #67, s/he stated the privacy curtain was dirty and s/he had asked them to change it. During the interview, s/he also stated that in his/her previous room, the curtain became soiled and was not changed for months. S/he stated that in both instances, various facility staff verified it was soiled and dirty and still it was not changed timely. On 6/23/25 at 9:34 AM during dual observations with both the Regional Mobile Director of Nursing (RMDON#26) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #18) they observed and verified Resident #67's privacy curtain was dirty and soiled with brown marks all over it. When asked if that is how a resident's curtain should look LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation and failed to report the results of all investigations within 5 working days of the incident, to the State Survey Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 (Resident #194) of 47 residents reviewed during a recertification survey. The findings include: On 6/17/2025 at 7:50 AM during initial pool screen, Resident #194 reported to the surveyor that the Aide [Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)] who worked on the night shift was very rough while changing her/him. The resident stated that when s/he asked the Aide to stop, the Aide said, How am I going to get this diaper into your creases. When asked if the resident told anybody about this, Resident #194 stated s/he told the night nurse that the Aide was rough and mean. On 6/17/2025 at 8:15 AM Surveyor informed the Unit Manager (UM #7) about Resident #194's allegations of abuse by a nightshift GNA. UM #7 stated that she was not aware of the above allegation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing about the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged from the facility to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) of 2 residents reviewed who were transferred to an acute care facility during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 on 06/26/25 12:55 PM revealed that the Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was sent to an acute care facility on 06/23/25 for a change in his/her medical condition. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the Resident and/or the Resident representative were given written notice of the bed hold policy. The facility's documentation on change in condition transfer form, nurse's progress notes, and the eINTERACT SBAR Summary dated 6/23/2025 23:03 revealed that the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint reviews, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide needed activities of daily living (ADL) for a resident dependent on bathing assistance. This was evident for 1 (Resident #386) of 15 complaints reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Review of complaints MD00214746 and MD00213586 on 06/17/25 revealed allegations that Resident #386 was not receiving showers or baths. On 06/23/25 at 2:20 PM Resident #386's closed medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #386 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with a history of having seizures, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the surveyor's observation, medical record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician and sanitize or wash hands before the administration of medication. This was evident for 1 (#83) of 3 Residents reviewed for medication administration via gastrostomy tube, during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/26/25 at 8:30 AM, Review of Resident #83's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was receiving long-term care. The physician ordered: 1. Aspirin 81 mg, one tablet via G Tube one time a day. 2. Polyethylene Glycol powder, give 17 grams enterally, one time a day for bowel regimen and hold for loose stool. 3. Theragran-M tablet, give one tablet via G tube, one time a day as a supplement. 4. Proheal liquid protein, two times a day for supplement, 30 ml via peg tube. 5. Captopril tablet 25mg, give one tablet via G tube, every eight hours, for hypertension.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain vision. This is evident for 1 out of 8 residents (Resident #38) selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: On 06/16/25 at 08:15 AM during the screening process of the survey, the surveyor observed Resident #36 eating breakfast with eyes closed, not wearing glasses, and feeling with hands for food items. During an interview on 06/16/25 at 12:45 PM, surveyor asked the resident if they has difficulty seeing, and resident replied yes. The resident was opening and closing eyes during the interview and was not making eye contact. Review of the resident's medical record on 06/16/25 at 12:58 PM revealed the resident MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment on May 21, 2025, at 07:39AM in section B1000. Vision Ability to see in adequate light (with glasses or other visual appliances) identified Resident as Impaired. B1200. Corrective Lenses Corrective lenses (contacts, glasses, or magnifying glass) used in completing B1000…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was given pain medication consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 2 (#131, #189) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management during the survey. The findings include: 1) During an initial pool screen of Resident #131 on 6/16/2025 at 9:15 AM, the resident complaint of pain rating it at 10/10 to the back of his/her neck going down their back. Resident #131 further stated that the staff did not give them pain medications regularly and were making him/her wait for long periods. Review of Resident #131's clinical records on 6/18/2025 at 8:00 AM revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in June 2025 with medical diagnoses that include but not limited to acquired absence of other left toe(s) encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, type 2 diabetes with other skin complications, bacteremia, unspecified atrial fibrillation, need for assistance with personal care. On 6/18/2025 at 8:09 AM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staff records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews of Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs). This was evident for 1 (GNA #34) of 2 randomly selected GNAs' employee files reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: Performance reviews are to be completed for every GNA at least every 12 months to identify in-service education based on the outcome of those reviews. On 6/26/25 at 9:46 AM, the employee files of 2 GNA's were reviewed during the staffing facility task. During the review, it was noted that GNA #34 was hired on 4/7/22; however, failed to reveal a performance evaluation had been completed for GNA #34 in the 2023 calendar year. On 6/26/25 at 10:02 AM the Human Resources Director (HRD #31) stated that everything was in the employees' files except for the online training from HealthStream and Relias. On 6/26/25 at 10:17 AM the surveyor shared the concern with HRD #31that there was no performance review for 2023 in GNA #34's employee file. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists and agreed upon by the medical director in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #87) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: The Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a review of the medication regimen (plan) of each resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse (negative) consequences and potential risks associated with medications. The MRR must be completed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the residents' medical record to identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, errors, and/or other irregularities. Lorazepam, also known by the brand name Ativan, is a psychotropic medication and classified as a Schedule IV controlled substance. It is commonly used to treat anxiety disorders and is also used for short-term relief of the symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents, review of the medical record, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (#20) out of 47 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 6/16/25 at 9:25 AM in an interview with Resident #20 s/he stated s/he had bad teeth and needed to see the dentist. On 6/18/25 at 8:06 AM review of Resident #20's medical record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed 3 HealthDrive (facility's dental provider) notes from the Registered Dental Hygienist (RDH #37) dated 5/3/24, 11/5/24, and 5/7/25. The 5/3/24 dental note from RDH #37 stated, Periodic oral exam 10/16/24 and Annual exam 4/16/25; however, there was no documentation that the resident had been seen by a dentist for his/her periodic oral exam or annual exam. The 11/5/24 dental note from RDH #37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's kitchen, review of kitchen records, and interview of staff, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent ice from building up in the walk-in freezer and in the refrigerator. This was evident for two refrigerators/freezers observed during the survey. The findings include: On 06/16/25 at 07:39 AM, Surveyor's initial observation of the cold storage/Freezer room in the kitchen, accompanied by the dietary staff, # 41 revealed that Ice was built on the floor and Ice particles were covering almost 75% of the freezer room Ceiling. Staff #41 was not aware of the preventive maintenance schedule for the freezer room. On 06/16/25 at 12:40 PM, the Surveyor observed the refrigerator/freezer in the second-floor nourishment room, to store residents' food, brought from outside. More than an inch of ice was built around the freezer. The surveyor also noted that the residents' snacks were placed in the refrigerator. On 06/25/25 at 11:45 AM, findings were reviewed with Dietary staff # 41 and with the Nursing home administrator. On 06/25/25 at 2:15 pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 2 (Residents #344, #340) of 15 complaints reviewed during the survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) A review of Resident #344's closed medical record on 06/24/25 at 1 PM revealed 2 physician certifications of incapacity. The first physician certification of incapacity was regarding Resident #344. It was dated and signed on 09/06/2022 at 12 PM by Resident #344's physician due to dementia. The second certificate of incapacity was regarding a totally different Resident. It was dated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure: 1.) Staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when administering medications to residents on droplet precautions and 2.) Residents' medical equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. This was found to be evident for 6 of 32 residents observed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey (Residents #169, #170, #171, and #53). The findings include: 1. A medication administration observation was done on 7/1/22 at 9:40 AM and the following concerns were identified: a. At 9:40 AM of Staff #16, a Registered Nurse (RN) administered medications to Resident #169. There was a sign posted on the door that read Droplet and Contact Precautions with instructions on PPE ( eye protection) is to be worn before entering the room. Staff #16 wore glasses and did not put on goggles or a face shield before entering the resident's room carrying the resident's medications inside small medication cups. Staff #16 placed the medication onto the resident bedside table which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of residents by failing to ensure residents received preferred incontinent brief sizes (Residents #45 and #66). The findings include: 1. On 6/27/22 at 9:00 am, during initial observation rounds, the surveyor interviewed Resident #45 regarding the resident's preferences. Resident #45 stated that the facility runs out of his/her preferred incontinent brief size regularly. Facility staff will use a smaller incontinent brief and Resident #45 stated that the smaller incontinent brief size causes excessive chafing. On 6/29/22 at 8:26 am, an interview with Clinical Care Coordinator #8 revealed the facility's supply order process. Clinical Care Coordinator #8 stated that when facility staff observes a low number of needed supplies, facility staff will tell the unit manager. The unit manager will check the main unit supply closet for the item. If the item isn't available for restocking, the unit manager will contact Supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment as evidenced by residents having scrapped paint and drywall and broken equipment in residents' rooms. This was evident for 3 of 5 residents assessed for a clean and comfortable homelike environment (#26, #34 & #87). The finding includes: On 6/28/2022 at 10:59 a.m. while performing observation rounds on the second floor, the surveyor observed: an exposed wire on the floor at the foot of Resident #26's bed, scraped drywall, and paint on the wall behind the bed, and a pillow stuck under the resident's bed. On 6/28/2022 at 11:44 a.m. the surveyor observed scraped paint on the wall behind Resident #87 bed. On 6/28/2022 at 11:55 a.m. the surveyor observed a missing dresser drawer on the left side of Resident #34's dresser. On 7/5/2022 at 12:05 p.m. during an interview with the Director of Maintenance #13 regarding the regular maintenance in the facility. He/she stated the facility utilize the TELS electronic system for maintenance request and they have daily and monthly logs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate a care plan for a resident who had a significant weight loss. This was evident in 1(#107) of 3 resident records reviewed for care plan timing. The findings include: A review of Resident # 107 electronic medical record on 06/29/22 at 11:53 am revealed on 05/09/22 the resident's weight was documented as 199 pounds. On 06/22/22 the resident's weight was documented as 188 pounds which was a 5.53% weight loss. On 07/05/22 at 12:05 pm during an interview with Staff #11, he/she was asked what type of interventions were put in place for the resident's weight loss? He/she made the surveyor aware the resident's notes were reviewed and made aware of the resident's weight loss. He/she reported not putting any interventions in place or reducing food from his/her end. Staff#11 was unable to provide documentation that a care plan was initiated to address the resident's weight loss.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to carry out physician's orders for treatment administration. This was evident in 1 in 3 resident records reviewed for timely treatment administration (Resident #26). The findings include: On 07/01/22 at 9:30 am a review of Resident #26's treatment administration record (TAR) revealed multiple orders were not initialed as completed in the electronic medical record: On 01/14/21 at 7:00 am Resident #26 was ordered to have the sacral (lower back and tailbone) wound cleaned with an antimicrobial solution every day and evening shift. The treatment was not initialed as provided on the day shift on 04/02/22. On 02/11/21 at 3:00 pm Resident #26 received orders to have an antimicrobial solution and skin prep the area surrounding the sacral wound and water-insoluble dressing to the wound bed and to cover the wound with a foam dressing. The treatment was not signed off as completed on 04/02/22 on the day shift and 06/23/22 on the evening shift. On 03/25/22 at 7:00 am Resident #26 was ordered a topical antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, a medical record review, and an interview with the staff, the facility's staff failed to consistently apply interventions to prevent fall-related injury for a resident that is a known fall risk (Resident #54). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for accidents during an annual survey. The findings include: On 6/27/22 at 9:30 am Resident #54 was observed unattended and in bed. There were no fall mats on the floor near the resident's bed. On 6/28/22 at 7:13 am, a review of Resident #54's medical record revealed that the resident had a fall incident on 6/6/22. A review of the facility's fall investigation dated, 6/12/22, revealed that the resident was recommended to have fall mats on the right side of the bed. Resident #54's care plan was changed to include fall mats on the right side of the resident's bed to assist in preventing injury from falls. On 6/28/22 at 10:00 am, Resident #54 was observed in bed. Staff was not present in the resident's room. There were no fall mats on the floor near the resident's bed. An interview with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to address the nutritional needs of a resident who had a significant weight loss. This was evident in 1 of 2 resident records reviewed for nutritional assessments (Resident #107). The findings include: A review of Resident #107 ' s electronic medical record on 06/29/22 at 11:53 am revealed on 05/09/22 the resident's weight was documented as 199 pounds. On 06/22/22 the resident's weight was documented as 188 pounds. This is a 5.53% decrease in the resident ' s weight. On 07/05/22 at 12:03 pm, a review of Resident #107 ' s electronic medical record revealed a weight change note dated, 06/24/22. The note read, Value: 188.0 pounds Vital Date: 2022-06-22 change from the last weight of 5.5%. The resident will have a re-weight. Snack daily at bedtime. Referral to a dietician for the addition of supplements if warranted. Further review of the resident ' s record did not reveal evidence of the facility completing a nutritional assessment on Resident #107 after they documented a decline in the resident ' s weight.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 observed errors out of 27 opportunities for error resulting in an error rate of 7.41 %. This was found to be evident for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration observation conducted during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: A medication administration observation was conducted on 7/5/22 at 9:40 AM with Staff #16, a Registered Nurse (RN). Staff #16 prepared and administered medications for Resident #169. While preparing the resident's medications, Staff #16 observed that the following medications were not in the medication cart: 1. Incruse Ellipta Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 62.5 mcg/inhalation (umeclidinium Bromide- a class of medication called anticholinergics 1 puff inhale orally one time a day for COPD (a type of lung disease that makes it hard to breathe). 2. Advair Diskus Aerosol (Powder Breath Activated 500-50 MCG/Act) 1 puff inhale orally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to adhere to the policy for storage of controlled substances by ensuring that the narcotic keys remain with the assigned nurse. This was found to be evident during a medication administration observation during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: While conducting a medication administration observation for Resident #170 on 7/5/22 with Staff 16, another Staff #17, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) approached Staff #16 and asked her for the medication keys. Staff #16 gave the medication keys to Staff #17. She then went to the medication cart that was approximately 15-20 feet away and diagonally across from where we were standing and opened the lock on the medication cart and then unlocked the narcotic medication box and retrieved medications from the narcotic medication box. After retrieving the medications, Staff #17 brought the keys back to Staff #16. They did not do a medication narcotic count. Staff #16 was asked to explain why she gave the narcotic keys to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure that sanitary practices were followed, equipment was maintained, and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 06/27/22 at 12:00 PM a tour of the facility's main kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Manager. The following was observations were made during the tour: 1. The kitchen walls were missing random baseboard tiles and had holes in the baseboard where the tiles used to be. 2. The surveyor observed a full cart of trays with slices of cake in the refrigerator uncovered. 3. In the refrigerator surveyor identified Caesar salad dressing open with a date of 3/9/22 and sweet relish open with a date of 3/9/22. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the date of 3/9/22 was when the product was open. 4. The freezer had a build-up of ice on the fan, ceiling, and shelving units. These deficiencies were confirmed with the food service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards. This was evident in 2 of 7 resident records reviewed for documentation (#26 & #107). The finds include: On 07/01/22 at 11:25 am a review of Resident #26's treatment administration record (TAR) revealed on 03/04/21 the resident was ordered Calazime skin protectant paste to be applied topically to the sacrum and perineal areas every shift and as needed (PRN). In May of 2022, 20 of 31 days the nurses who were assigned to care for the resident documented NA (not applicable) on the TAR where the site of the cream was ordered to be applied. The chart Codes/Follow-Up Codes listed at the bottom of the TAR does not include not applicable (NA) in the legend. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) Staff 2, she was unable to tell the surveyor the meaning of NA in the medical record. On 07/01/22 at 1:43 pm during an interview with RN #5, he/she stated the order says where to place the skin protectant. When asked why he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide urinary catheter care to Resident #13 as ordered. This is evident for 1 of 66 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was seen by the urologist on 7/7/17. Urologist are physicians who specialize in the genitourinary tract-the kidneys, urinary bladder, adrenal glands, urethra and male reproductive organs-and male fertility. Urologists are also trained in the surgical and medical treatment of diseases that affect these organs. It was noted at the time Resident #13 had a suprapubic catheter due to chronic urinary retention. A suprapubic catheter is a hollow flexible tube that is used to drain urine from the bladder. It is inserted into the bladder through a cut in the tummy, a few inches below the navel (tummy button). Urinary retention is an inability to completely empty the bladder. It was noted on 7/7/17 the urologist made the recommendations: catheter drainage approximately 50 cc (1 ½ ounce)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. This was evident for 6 of 66 residents (#11; #38; #66; #77; #110 & #428) reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #11 and an interview with the unit Manager Staff #2 failed to reveal documentation regarding the care and cleaning of Resident #11's BiPAP machine. BiPAP and CPAP machines are Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure /Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machines which are non-invasive forms of therapy used to treat patients suffering from sleep apnea. Sleep apnea is a serious sleep disorder that occurs when a person's breathing is interrupted during sleep. In an interview with Unit Manager Staff #2 on 10/19/18 at 8:00 AM surveyor asked who is responsible for cleaning BiPAP and CPAP machines, how often they are cleaned and where this information is documented? Staff #2 stated that she didn't know and would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide resident (#109) with the most dignified existence. This was evident for 1 of 66 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Based on review of nursing progress notes, resident and staff interviews and it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident #109 with the proper equipment to promote a safe, comfortable and dignified environment for his/her shower. In an interview on 10/16/18 at 1:07 PM Resident #109 stated that on Saturday evening when s/he was scheduled to have a shower the available shower chair was too small. S/he told Geriatric Nursing Assistant staff #1 (GNA) that s/he would need a larger chair. GNA Staff #1 stated that she was too busy (listing all the things she had to do) and could not go get another chair at that time. Resident #109 stated that s/he didn't want to be a nuisance, so s/he decided not to push it any further. Resident #109 stated that s/he sat in the smaller chair and when s/he attempted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a private space to support residents right to privacy while conducting their monthly resident council meeting. The findings include: This surveyor was invited to attend the Resident Council meeting held on 10/17/18 at 2:00 PM in the second-floor dining room. The Activities Director who was also invited assisted the Resident Council President to conduct the meeting. During the meeting a family visitor entered the dining room uninvited, to purchase snacks from the vending machine. In an interview with the Director of Nursing, The Corporate Nurse and the Activities Director on 10/17/18 at 3:25 PM they were made aware of this concern. the Activities Director stated that going forward she will be posting a sign on the dining room doors to ensure that everyone will be aware that there is a private meeting in progress.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a resident's personal funds consistently available to the residents on the weekends. This was evident for 1 (Resident #90) of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Resident #90 was interviewed on 10/16/18 at 10:58 AM and was asked Can you get your money when you need it, including weekends? Resident #90 stated I cannot get any money on the weekends because no one is here. In an interview with the facility Business Office Manager (BOM) on 10/19/18 at 8:59 AM, the BOM stated the facility banking services are closed on the weekends and there is no one here to hand out cash to the residents. The facility must make arrangements to allow all residents access to their personal funds including on the weekends.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and a review of the personal funds accounts for selected residents it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide an interested family member of a resident's (#72) quarterly statement of their personal funds account. This was true for 1 out of the 2 residents reviewed for this survey task. The findings include: An interview with Resident #72 on 10/19/18 at 12:25 PM revealed that the resident has not received a quarterly statement for the resident's personal funds account. The Business Office Manager was interviewed on 10/19/18 at 12:25 PM. She stated she does not have record of the sister being the Responsible party (RP)/Power of Attorney (POA) for the resident. She shared copies of the quarterly statements and showed that the resident did not sign the paperwork. A review of Resident #72's clinical record revealed that the resident's sister signed the Resident's Agent Financial Agreement with Futurecare Northpoint form. The sister signed on the blank entitled Resident's Authorized Representative. The resident's sister is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement resident-centered care plan related to 1) a resident's pain management and 2) observing a resident for bruising. This was evident for 2 (Residents #8, #231) of 66 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #231's closed medical record on 10/18/18, revealed that the nursing staff had created a care plan on 09/20/18 to address Resident #231's pain related to a disease process. Nursing interventions included: administering analgesia as per physician order, monitor for side effects and effectiveness, anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain, monitor and document for probable cause of each pain episode and remove or limit each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview revealed the facility staff failed to provide 1:1 supervision for eating as ordered by the physician for Resident #43. This was evident for 1 of 66 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #43 revealed on 10/12/18 the physician ordered: resident needs 1:1 supervision during meals to prevent aspiration. Pulmonary aspiration is food, stomach acid, or saliva is inhaled into the lungs. You can also aspirate food that travels back up from your stomach to your esophagus. Surveyor observation of the resident on 10/19/18 at 8:05 AM revealed the facility staff delivered Resident #43 breakfast tray and left the room. Further surveyor observation of Resident #43 at 8:10 AM and 8:20 AM revealed the resident in the room, eating breakfast; however, there was no noted facility staff noted in the room to supervise the eating of breakfast. The Director of Nursing was made aware of the same on 10/19/18 at 9:00 AM. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/19/18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most accurate form for 2 residents (#91 and #100). This was evident for 2 of 66 residents reviewed in the annual survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. Resident #91's chart had a request on 8-3-18 for a nephrology consult. The consult was not in the medical record. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10-18-18 at 1:00 PM confirmed that the nephrologist examines the residents in the on-site dialysis unit but does not document in the facilities medical records. The nephrologist maintains the visit notes in their office chart. The nephrologist information is not accessible to the facility physicians. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SEVEN GRAND C, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2007
SIMBA, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2007
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2007
ATTMAN, LEONARDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2007
GILDEN, SHELLYEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2007
LEVITAS, WENDEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2007
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2007
HARRINGTON, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2007
FC OF EASTPOINTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
SPADARO, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.7M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 17%Other / private 83%

This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$393per resident / day
operating cost
$11,946per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$403per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215147. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next