No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Future Care Capital Region

1051 Brightseat Road, Landover, MD 20785 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (240) 487-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (240) 487-4400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jan 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (15% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1019 Brightseat Rd · (301) 350-6009 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9701 Apollo Dr Ste 400 · (301) 477-3367 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Shoppers0.9 mi
806 Largo Center Dr · (301) 808-0129 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8550 Chatsfield Way · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8501 Jericho City Dr · (301) 333-0500

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.5%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.1%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.4%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers17.8%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.8%25.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.101.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.731.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,091 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.76U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 434 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.8%CMS range 63.3–70.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 10.7–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 4.6–7.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.11
RN hoursweekends
14.9%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 143.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.02 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.64 to 1.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interviews, Ombudsman interview and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide notification to the facility's Ombudsman of Resident transfers and discharges to the hospital. This finding was found to be evident in 8 out of 8 hospitalizations for 4 (Resident #9, #10, #14 and #17) out of 4 Residents reviewed for discharge process.The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility census and noted that Resident #9 was not in the facility and in the hospital. On further review it appeared that Resident #9 was admitted to the hospital several times in the last few months and are as follows: 11/7/25 12/13/25 1/14/26 The surveyor requested documentation that the Ombudsman was notified of Resident #9 transfers in November and December of 2025. On 1/23/26 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Nursing Home Administration (NHA). During the interview the NHA confirmed that transfers were not being communicated to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, surveyor record reviews, review of facility policies, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards during 1) medication ordering 2) medication administration documenting 3) medication order clarification 4) medication administering and 5) documenting care and services provided to a Resident accurately. These findings were found to be evident in 3 (Residents #168, #15 & #16) out of 7 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 2 (Residents #138 & #103) out of 4 Residents observed for medication administration and 1 (Resident #96) out of 5 Residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. Controlled Drugs are classified into five (5) distinct categories or schedules depending upon the drug's acceptable medical use and the drug's abuse or dependency potential. Schedule II drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, Resident and staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care and services for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 5 (Resident #1, 4, 7, 96 and 140) out of 10 Residents reviewed for respiratory care and services.The findings include:1) Ventilator is a machine that helps or takes over the function of breathing for a person who is unable to breathe adequately on their own. The ventilator is controlled by a healthcare professional to deliver air and oxygen into the lungs using a breathing tube or mask.On tour of the PCU Nursing Unit at 9:56 AM on 1/20/2026 the surveyor observed an emergency tank of oxygen attached with straps to the ventilator stand at Residents #1, #7 and #96's bedside. There was no oxygen usage signage on these Resident room doors.The surveyor conducted a record review of Residents #1, #7 and #96's medical record on 1/22/2026, specifically the physician orders. There were active physician orders in Resident #1, #7 and #96's medical records that indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility staff interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations. This was identified during multiple observations of the kitchen and dining areas on the annual survey. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8:48 AM the surveyor conducted the initial tour of the kitchen. On the tour, the surveyor observed:A multi- nozzle beverage dispenser with black substance on each nozzleAn ice scoop was observed horizontally on top of the ice machine. The scoop was not in a position for proper drainage between uses.On 1/20/26 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor shared concerns with Food Service Director (FSD).On 01/28/2026 at 8:20 AM the surveyor observed 4 white blankets, separately folded, resting under the boiler free steamer. The surveyor made the FSD aware and the FSD removed them immediately.At 8:23 AM the surveyor reviewed the food service temperature logs for food items prepared for each meal service. The review revealed that the documentation failed to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility staff interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately document food temperature logs to prevent foodborne illness. This was identified during multiple observations of the kitchen and dining areas on the annual survey. The findings include:A follow-up tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 1/28/26 at 7:40 AM which revealed:At 7:58 AM the surveyor asked the FSD how staff ensure proper chemical sanitization within the 3- compartment sink. The FSD attempted to test the chemical levels in the sanitization part of the 30compartment sink and the test revealed that there was not enough chemical detected to sanitize any dishes. The FSD attempted to pump the chemical solution into the sink and test the levels in the sanitization sink and the levels were again too low (less than 200 parts per million (ppm). The FSD attempted to manually add the chemical solution to the sanitization part of the 3-compartment sink and test the levels of the chemical which then revealed the required the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review. it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents' dignity, honor the exercise of residents' rights, and provide necessary in-house podiatry service in a timely manner. This was found to be evident of 1 (Resident #13) out of 2 reviewed for dignity of care during an annual survey. The findings are as follows:During an initial observation on 01/20/2026 at 10:34 AM, it was noted that Resident #13's bed linen had multiple yellow drainage stains originating from a wound on the right heel. Additionally, the resident was found to have severely overgrown and thickened toenails on both feet.During a subsequent interview, the resident stated they were unable to trim their own nails and had informed staff of this need upon admission. Regional Clinical Services Staff #23 was in the room witnessing the drainage on the resident's bed-drawsheet and the overgrown toenails and indicated that she would follow up on these issues.A record review conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a resident's advanced directive. This was evident in 1 (Resident #15) of 5 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives during an annual survey. An advance directive is a legal document, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare. These documents specify preferences for medical care, including life-sustaining treatments, and/or indicate individuals who are chosen to make decisions if you become unable to communicate decisions. The findings include: On [DATE] at 7:34 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #15's paper medical record. The review revealed that Resident #15's Maryland Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form indicated that Resident's choices were based on the patient's advanced directive. However, the surveyor was unable to find the advanced directive in the medical record. On [DATE] at 7:25 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During the interview the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and facility staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 1 Resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) out of 23 Resident rooms reviewed during tour of the PCU unit. The findings include:While rounding on the PCU Nursing Unit on 1/20/2026 at 1:15 PM, it was observed that the wall next to the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was severely marred and chipped including the doorframe to the bathroom.The TELS platform connects facility teams to data including work orders, assets, compliance, and capital planning all in one place. TELS is a facilities management system designed to streamline and simplify work order creation, tracking, and completion, and to assist with managing preventative maintenance (PM) programs.In an interview with the PCU Nurse Manager at 9:15 AM on 1/28/2026, she stated that the marred and chipped wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] was from the Hoyer lift and the shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy documentation, facility employee files and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure criminal background checks were completed prior to allowing an employee to work with residents. This was evident for 1 out of 5 facility employee files reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy revealed the following: Screening Prospective employees will have a background screening completed per Human Resource Policies for applicant screening.On 1/28/26 at 10 AM review of geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #16's employee file revealed the employee was hired on 8/14/24.Review of GNA #16's timesheet data revealed worked with residents on August 14, 15, 16,19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 2024; and September 2 and 3, 2024.Further review of the employee's file revealed a criminal background check document that initiated and completed on 9/25/24.During an interview conducted on 1/28/26 at 1:36 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor record review and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented on a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #140) out of 2 Residents reviewed for a comprehensive care plan for dialysis. The findings include:Hemodialysis is a procedure used to treat individuals with acute or chronic kidney failure. Hemodialysis uses a machine and a specialized filter (dialyzer) to remove waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood. Hemodialysis replaces kidney function. Hemodialysis requires vascular access, usually through an arteriovenous (AV) fistula. An AV fistula is an abnormal, direct connection between an artery and a vein. Additionally, a permacath may be used for hemodialysis. A permacath is a special catheter used for short-term dialysis treatment. The catheter is placed inside a blood vessel in the neck or under the collarbone and threaded into the right side of the heart.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #140's medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor record review and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timing, revision and updates of Resident care plans. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #1 and #140) out of 10 Residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision.The findings include:In an interview with Resident #1 at 9:29 AM on 1/21/2026 about care plan meeting, he/she stated that he/she has not attended a care plan meeting. Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #1's medical record on 1/22/2026 at 7:56 AM. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed that there was no documentation that a care plan meeting was held for Resident #1. In an interview with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) on 1/22/2026 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor requested any documentation that a care plan meeting occurred for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility staff interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper tube feeding management for a Resident. This finding was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #10) out of 3 Residents reviewed for tube feeding.The findings include:Gastrostomy tube (G-Tube)/feeding tube is a tube surgically placed into the stomach through an opening in the abdomen to provide nutrition, fluids and medication when a person cannot eat or drink safely by mouth.Enteral nutrition/feedings is a medical method of providing nutrition and fluids through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract using a feeding tube. The liquid formula contains essential nutrients like protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins, and minerals.On tour of the PCU Unit on 1/20/2026 at 8:50 AM the surveyor observed Resident #10 in bed in no distress. Hanging on a pole next to Resident #10's bed were 2 bags of fluid; one bag was labeled with the enteral feeding, and the other bag had a clear liquid substance contained in the bag. The clear liquid bag did not have a label on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care and services to a resident with intravenous access devices. This was evident for 1 (Resident #168) out of 2 residents reviewed for fluids and dehydration. A central venous catheter (CVC) is a long, flexible tube that a provider inserts into a vein. It can be found in the neck, chest, arm or groin. The tube leads to your vena cava, a large vein that empties into your heart. A CVC helps a person receive drugs, fluids, or blood, for long-term treatments. A type of CVC is a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter). CVCs have risks which include infection, blood clots, vein inflammation and (rarely) displacement or vessel damage and need to be cared for appropriately. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #168. During the interview Resident #168 stated that he/she had recently been in the hospital. Next the surveyor observed that Resident #168 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medications consistent with professional standards. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #168) out of 4 Residents reviewed for pain management during the survey. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8:47 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #168. During the interview Resident #168 stated that he/she learned that he/she had to maintain a schedule with pain medication because if he/she waited too long to take the medication it was hard to bring the pain back down to an acceptable level. On 1/22/26 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's medical record. The review revealed on 1/10/26 Resident #168 had an order written for Oxycodone 10mg, with instructions, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain of 5-10 on a pain scale. On further review this same order was written again on 1/16/26. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to document medication administration according to procedures that ensure accurate disposition of medications. This was found evident of 28 of 48 narcotic medications removed for Residents #168 and #16. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8:47 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #168. During the interview Resident #168 stated that he/she had been taking pain medications related to a recent surgery. On 1/22/26 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's medical record. The review revealed on 1/10/26 Resident # 168 had an order written for Oxycodone 10mg, with instructions, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain of 5-10 on a pain scale. On further review this same order was written again on 1/16/26. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR). The review revealed Resident #168 had 20 documented administrations of oxycodone from 1/11/26-1/21/26. The surveyor requested to review the controlled drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adequately monitor a resident's drug regimen which allowed an unnecessary duplicate order for a medication. This finding was evident for 1 (Resident #168) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 8:47 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #168. During the interview Resident #168 stated that he/she had been taking pain medications related to a recent surgery. On 1/22/26 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's medical record. The review revealed on 1/10/26 Resident # 168 had an order written for Oxycodone 10mg, with instructions, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain of 5-10 on a pain scale. On further review this same order was written again on 1/16/26. However, the order written on 1/10/26 was not discontinued so Resident #168 had two current orders for same medication. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #168's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured in a locked compartment and not expired. This finding was found to be evident on 2 (PCU and Vital Strong) out of 4 nursing units and review of the PCU medication room during the annual survey.The findings include: On tour of the PCU Unit at 1:35 PM on [DATE] the surveyor and the PCU Nursing Manager observed a medication cart unattended and unlocked with the top drawer of the medication cart opened outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The PCU Manager closed the top drawer of the medication cart and locked the medication cart as Registered Nurse (RN) #9 was exiting a Resident room. The PCU Manager stated to RN #9 that the medication cart was observed opened and should have been locked. In an interview with the PCU Manager at 1:40 PM on [DATE] the surveyor asked the PCU Manager what the expectation was for the medication carts to be secured when unattended by nursing staff. The PCU…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory results in a timely manner. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #154) out of 2 residents reviewed for hydration. A peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter is a short, flexible tube inserted into a small vein for short-term (approximately 3-4 days) use to administer fluids, medications, or blood products. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #34 removed Resident #154's IV site. The surveyor asked LPN #34 why Resident #154 had an IV placed and was told that the resident just completed the course of IV fluids that was ordered for hydration. On 1/22/26 at 9:55 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #154's medical record. The review revealed a change of condition was written on 1/16/26 by LPN #35. The note stated that laboratory (lab) results were reviewed by the Nurse Practitioner #36 and an order was placed for Resident #154 to receive IV fluids and have a repeat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that food menus were followed and prepared in advance to meet residents' meal choices. This was found to be evident of 2 (Resident #11 and #27) out of 10 Residents reviewed for food during an annual survey. The findings include: On 1/21/26 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #11. During the interview the Resident alleged that sometimes he/she does not receive the food items that are listed on the meal ticket menu and sometimes his/her meal is delivered in disposable containers. The surveyor observed that Resident #11's breakfast was in a plastic square takeout container however it appeared that the order ticket menu was accurate with the Resident's meal. On 1/23/26 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor observed Unit Manager (UM) #22 deliver Resident #11's lunch tray and placed the lunch on Resident #11's over-the-bed table. UM #22 stated that she would be back with additional gravy for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards for accuracy. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #15) out of 55 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 1/21/26 at 8:22 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #15's family member. During the interview the family member stated that Resident #15 had multiple chronic conditions and had been in and out of the hospital recently. On 1/22/26 at 8:13 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #15's medical record. The review revealed Resident #15 had a past medical history, that included but not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and history of colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal and bringing and end of the large intestine to the exterior creating a stoma). Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #15's care plans. The review revealed that a care plan was placed in Resident # 15's care plan on 10/2/25 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that 1) the facility failed to maintain practices to help prevent the transmission of infections and 2) failed to follow infection control protocols of the laundry process, maintain laundry dryers in sanitary and hazard free condition, and maintain a copy of the manufacturer's instructions for the washer and dryer. These findings were found to be evident in 2 out of 3 medication administration observations and 1 random observation of shared equipment, and in 3 out of 3 dryers observed during the annual survey. The findings include:1) On 1/28/26 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor observed License Practical Nurse (LPN) # 20 prepare medications for Resident #138. The surveyor observed LPN #20 take Resident #138's multidose lispro (short acting) insulin pen and apply the needle and then administer the medication. The surveyor noted that LPN #20 did not clean the port prior to applying the needle. On 1/28/26 at 9:01 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with LPN #20 and asked if the pen was supposed to be cleaned before applying the needle.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a call light device accessible and functioning properly for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #96 and #125) out of 19 Residents reviewed for Resident call system.The findings include: During tour of the Resident rooms on the PCU Nursing Unit on 1/20/2026 at 1:15 PM the surveyor observed that Resident #96 was lying in bed, with head of bed (HOB) elevated and in no distress. The call light device was hanging on the bed frame at the HOB. In an interview with the PCU Nursing Unit Manager on 1/20/2026 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor conveyed that Resident #96 did not have an accessible call light device. The PCU Nursing Unit Manager and the surveyor observed Resident #96 in bed with the call light device hanging on the HOB bed frame. The PCU Nursing Unit Manager removed the call light device from the HOB bed frame and positioned the call light device to be accessible for Resident #96. The PCU…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were provided reasonable accommodations as evidenced by call lights not readily available for Residents (#6, #46, #62, #97,100, #124). This was found to be evident for 6 out of 6 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The findings include: During the initial tour of the PPCU-1 unit on 7/15/2024 at 9:15 AM, the surveyors observed the following residents without a call light in reach. Resident (#6) was in bed and the call light cord was observed hanging on the oxygen gauge on the wall, and Residents (#62 and #100) were in bed and the call light was observed on the floor. In addition, the surveyors observed that Residents (#46, #97 and #124) did not have an available call light. On 7/15/2024 at 11:00 AM the surveyors conducted an interview with the Regional Clinical Services Manager (RCSM) RN #2 on the PPCU-1 unit after the surveyor's initial tour. The surveyors conveyed to the Regional Clinical Services Manager (RCSM) RN #2 that call lights were not available or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate tube feeding care and services. This was evident in 4 (Resident #24, #62, #83 and #100) out of 4 residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The findings include: Enteral tube/feeding tube/gastrostomy tube is a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation. The state of being fed by a feeding tube is called gavage, enteral feeding or tube feeding. A variety of feeding tubes are used in medical practice. The tube is inserted through the abdomen and into the stomach or intestines. Enteral feeding syringes are designed for delivering enteral tube feed, water, and medications via enteral feeding tube and/or to aspirate (suction) a feeding tube. On the initial tour of the PPCU-1 unit on 7/15/2024 at 9:15 AM the surveyors observed Resident #62, #83 and #100 in bed with a 60-cc enteral feeding syringe at the bedside which was not labeled with a date. In addition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) the accuracy of the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) in place and 2) to identify a resident's surrogate as per the authority granted by the Health Care Decisions Act. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #116 and #448) out of 5 residents reviewed for the MOLST as part of the instruction. The findings include: MOLST is a medical order form that relays instructions between health professionals about patient care. The MOLST form certifies orders that were agreed to by a patient or a patient's health care agent as named in the patient's advance directive. MOLST determines resuscitation status and includes other 8 sections of treatment choices, for example, medication administration and nutrition. 1) Interview, on 07/16/24 at 09:22 AM, found that Resident #116 was confused, only knew his name and unable to understand simple questions. The family at the bed side stated that he/she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide notification to the Ombudsman of the resident that transferred to the hospital. This was evident in 1 Resident (#24) out of 1 Resident reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: On 7/17/2024 at 7:30 AM the surveyor reviewed Resident #24's medical record. The review of the medical record revealed that Resident #24 was transferred to the hospital on 4/25/24 and 5/4/2024. In an interview at 8:15 AM on 7/19/2024 the surveyor requested from the Regional Clinical Services Manager (RCSM) Registered Nurse (RN) #1 the documentation of the Ombudsman notification of Resident #24's transfer to the hospital on 4/25/24 and 5/4/2024. In a follow-up interview with the Regional Clinical Services Manager (RCSM) RN #1 at 8:45 AM on 7/19/2024 the RCSM RN #1 stated to the surveyor that the notification to the Ombudsman had not been completed for Resident #24's transfers to the hospital on 4/25/2024 and 5/4/2024. At 9:20 AM on 7/19/2024 the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged from the facility to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#116 and #53) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: A Bed Hold is the act of holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. It must be provided to all facility residents regardless of payment source. The Bed Hold policy should be disclosed in the admission packet during an initial admission to the facility and it should be disclosed to resident/resident representatives at the time of transfer. 1a) During the interview, on 07/15/24 at 12:23 PM, it was revealed that the family was notified by phone on 06/11/24 regarding the transfer of Resident #116 to the hospital. Record review, on 07/17/24 at 12:19 PM, revealed that a transfer order and a transfer form were in place dated 06/11/24 at 10:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure: 1) that Resident (#131) was administered medication and 2) an outside medical appointment was scheduled for Resident (#435) in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #131 and #435) out 2 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. The findings include: 1) During record review for Resident #131 on 07/23/24 at 01:29 PM, it was documented that Resident #131 had been evaluated by a medical provider on 05/26/24 for complaints of nausea without vomiting. The surveyor reviewed the medication administration record, it was revealed that Resident #131 did not receive the medication as ordered. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/24/24 at 08:20 AM, she was asked to provide records that showed the resident received medication per their complaint. The DON reported she did not know if the medications were given, and that progress notes stated they were awaiting delivery of the medication. A Pyxis MedStation is an automated medication dispensing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate respiratory care and services. This was evident in 2 (Resident #24 and #62) out of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: On the initial tour of the PPCU-1 unit on 7/15/2024 at 9:15 AM the surveyor observed an oxygen humidifier bottle dated 7/3 attached to the oxygen gauge on the wall in Resident #24's room. The surveyor observed Resident #24 in bed with oxygen in place to the nostrils at 12:29 PM on 7/16/2024. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a tool used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to standardize assessments and care management for residents of Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. The MDS process evaluates a resident's functional capabilities and clinical needs, including their treatments, therapies, and psychosocial functioning. This information helps nursing home staff identify health problems and improve care management. MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a follow up after a psychiatric consult for (Resident #60). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident's reviewed for physician services. The findings include: During a review of Resident #60's physician orders conducted on 07/18/24 at 01:26 PM, the surveyor reviewed an order for a psychiatric consult ordered on 01/24/23. Following the order, a psychiatric consult comumnity Health Services completed an evaluation for Resident #60 on 01/26/23. It was documented in the subject area under the PLAN that the patient did not require two antidepressants based on current presentation. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/25/24 at 01:39 PM, she was asked about the documented psychiatric plan for the resident and was also asked about the follow-up physician or nursing notes based on the psychiatric consult conducted by the community Health Services. During an interview with the DON on 07/26/24 at 10:38 AM, she stated that the resident was found to have depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed by the medical provider. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #337) out of 1 resident's reviewed for medication timeliness. The findings include: A medical provider, also known as a health care provider, is a licensed individual or organization that provides health care services. During an interview on 07/15/24 at 12:35 PM, Resident #337's daughter stated that the night nurse had changed the time on a seizure medication without checking it with the doctor. No documentation was found on the record related to the medication time change. The surveyor requested additional information from the facility. 07/25/24 at 10:25 AM Review of the Clinical Incident Report written on 7/9/24, stated that Registered Nurse (RN) #22 did not administer a medication as ordered and scheduled. Education was provided to RN #22 on medication administration in relation to notifying the Medical Doctor or Nurse Practioner before making any timing changes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sanitary and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This was found for 2 out of 4 food refrigerator and storage areas observed during the annual survey. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director on 07/15/24 at 08:02 AM, the surveyor identified concerns with outdated food. Lemon pie was dated use by 2/14 with no open date or year in the freezer, a container was labeled opened 1/16 with no discard date or year in the dry storage area, and containers of teriyaki sauce and soy sauce were not labeled or dated in the cooking area. The Food Service Director stated that all items should be dated with the received, opened and discard dates including the year and she would educate staff. On 07/17/24 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor requested that Registered Nurse (RN) #11 to unlock the refrigerator door on the Vital Strong 2 (VS2) unit. An unlabeled, undated container of fruit, an undated bag with a resident name and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately document the Morse Fall Scale assessments for (Resident #60). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident's reviewed for falls. The findings include: The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is a tool that estimates a patient's risk of falling in various settings by assigning a score between 0 - 45 and higher points. During a review of Resident #60's medical record on 07/18/24 at 08:42 AM, it was revealed that Resident #60 fell on 09/22, 10/22, 8/23, 2/24, and 3/24. A review of the MFS assessment dated [DATE] did not accurately record the past history of falls as noted above. Therefore the resident fall risk was assessed inaccurately at a fall risk factor for moderate risk for falls. A review of the MFS assessment dated [DATE] did not accurately record the past history of falls as noted above. Therefore, the resident fall risk was assessed inaccurately at a fall risk factor for low risk for falls. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices before donning personal protective equipment (PPE). This was evident during an annual survey. The findings include: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is clothing or equipment that protects the wearer from injury or the spread of infection or illness. In healthcare settings, PPE can include items such as: protective clothing, helmets, gloves, face shields, goggles, and respirators. During observation on 07/24/24 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor observed the PPE cart with a sign posted that stated, Reminder, sanitize your hands before taking a gown. The sign was visible to everyone. The surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse Staff #28, remove PPE from the cart without performing hand hygiene before removing the PPE. The surveyor also observed two more facility staff remove PPE without performing hand hygiene first. During an interview with Registered Nurse Staff #29 on 07/24/24 at 12:28 PM, she was directed to the PPE cart, then asked what the process was for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a resident council meeting and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to post signs identifying the location of survey results in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. This was evident on all nursing units in the facility. The findings include: On 08/15/19 at 10:28 AM, during a resident council meeting with Residents #9, #53, #27, #40, #44, #50, and #7, when asked if they knew where the State Survey results were kept, none of the seven residents had seen nor knew the location of the State Survey results for the facility. During an interview on 8/15/19 at 1:00 PM, the nursing home administrator stated there was only one copy of the survey results available to residents. The Administrator stated that the results were kept in the facility's lobby. The Administrator and Director of Nursing was aware of this concern prior to and during survey exit.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that documentation of residents' care plan goals were sent with the resident to the receiving facility when the resident was hospitalized . This was evident for 3 (Residents #30, #54, and #43) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) Resident #30's medical record was reviewed on 8/8/19 at 2:42 PM. During the review, it was found that the resident was hospitalized twice in April, 2019; once was resident-initiated and the other was facility-initiated. Documentation that was sent with the resident for the facility-initiated transfer was reviewed and no documentation could be found that stated the resident's care plan goals. For the resident-initiated transfer, the resident was transported privately to the hospital and it was documented that the resident refused to take facility paperwork with him/her. This was confirmed in interview with the resident on 8/8/19 at 2:50 PM. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1. ensure that resident care plans were implemented for the elevation of the heels of a resident with pressure ulcers on both heels, and 2. develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objective related to a residents diagnosis and respirator needs. This was evident for 2 (Residents #33 and #277) of 51 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #33 was observed in bed on 8/15/19 at 9:39 AM. The resident was found to be on his/her back with the covers drawn up to his/her chin. The resident appeared comfortable, clean, and well groomed. The silhouette of the resident's feet suggested that the resident's heels were in direct contact with the mattress. Resident #33's medical record was reviewed contemporaneously. A care plan topic entitled, Pressure ulcer related to immobility was found with the intervention, Float/suspend heels while in bed. The Pulmonary Care Unit Manager was interviewed at 9:50 AM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately document fluid intake for Resident #92. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis during the survey. The findings include: On 8/8/19 at 9:16 AM during an interview with Resident #92, he/she was asked if he/she was on a fluid restriction. The resident indicated he/she was but did not know if staff were recording it or not. A cup was noted on the bedside table partially filled with water, but with no measurements printed on the side. Beginning on 8/8/19 at about 1:00 PM, the medical record for Resident #92 was reviewed. During the review it was noted the resident had a physician order for hemodialysis three times a week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for end stage renal disease (kidney failure). According to https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/hemodialysis, it states, You need dialysis if your kidneys no longer remove enough wastes and fluid from your blood to keep you healthy .In hemodialysis, a dialysis machine and a special filter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with residents, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident meals arrived at an appropriate temperature and near the scheduled time of meal delivery. This was evident for 1 of 2 observations of lunchtime tray delivery. The findings include: Resident #91 was interviewed on 8/7/19 at 12:46 PM. During the interview, the resident stated that there was often a significant delay between when the tray cart arrived and when staff brought trays to resident rooms. The resident illustrated this by saying that on the day prior, 8/6/19, the resident witnessed the food cart arrive to the unit at 1:10 PM but that s/he didn't receive his/her lunch tray until 1:40 PM. The resident stated these times were typical based on his/her experience. The resident further stated that entree items often arrive cold and ice cream arrives melted. The resident gave the opinion that not enough staff were available to assist in delivering trays and that the ones who did deliver the trays were slow about it. Resident #53 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure Resident #92 received lunch prior to the routinely scheduled pick-up time for dialysis, failed to ensure the resident was transferred to a geriatric chair (Geri Chair) in order to be ready for dialysis on time, and failed to ensure that dialysis staff picked up the resident on time; and 2) failed to ensure residents' meal selections and dietary preferences were honored during meal service. This was evident for 1 (Resident #92) of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis during the survey and 1 (Resident #26) of 51 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #92's medical record was reviewed on 8/8/19 at about 1:00 PM. During the review it was noted the resident had a physician order for hemodialysis three times a week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for end stage renal disease (kidney failure). It was also noted that the resident had Diabetes Mellitus type 2. According to https://www.diabetes.org/diabetes/type-2, Type 2 means…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication cart observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medical records were kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 3 out of 9 medication carts. The findings include: During an observation that took place on 8/7/19 at 8:49 AM of the [NAME] and Vent units, the surveyor observed the nursing shift-to-shift report laying on top of an unattended medication cart. This document is used by the facility's nursing staff for assigned nursing tasks that need to be preformed during the nurse's shift. This shift-to shift-report that the surveyor viewed contained residents' names, room numbers, vital signs, pain medications, labs, code status, bowel movement status with nursing medication and treatment comments visible for the public to view for the residents in rooms 210 - 218. This document was on top of medication cart-1. On 8/7/19 at 9:00 AM on the Vent unit, the surveyor observed another shift-to-shift report on top of the unattended medication cart-3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined facility staff erroneously coded the discharge destination on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) report for Resident #125. This was evident for 1 (Resident #125) of 3 closed records reviewed for discharge during the survey and for 1 (Resident #277) of 51 residents reviewed in the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening questions that provide the foundation for the RAI process. Providers must complete the MDS screening assessments at specified times during resident admissions. Some MDS assessments are comprehensive and others are abbreviated updates to the comprehensive assessments. After completion of any comprehensive MDS assessment, the MDS triggers care areas based on the responses to the MDS questions (also referred to as MDS Items). Each triggered care area must then be assessed in order to determine if care planning is needed; and if so to drive an effective plan that will ensure the assessed needs of each resident are met when care is delivered 1) On 8/14/19 beginning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with residents, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were given the opportunity to select meals from a menu in advance of the meal being serviced and that residents received the items that they selected from the menu. This was evident for 1 (Resident #30) of 2 residents reviewed for food. The findings include: Resident #30's medical record was reviewed on 8/8/19 at 2:47 PM. During the review, it was found that the resident was legally blind and that the resident experienced weight loss from weighing 164 lbs on 4/9/19 to weighing 148 lbs on 6/16/19. Resident #30 was interviewed on 8/9/19 at 12:17 PM. During the interview, the resident stated that s/he was able to feed him/herself with only minor assistance from facility staff in setting up the tray. However, the resident stated that s/he would often receive food that s/he did not like. Resident #30 stated that the facility used to provide menus in advance and would come ask the resident at the beginning of the week which entrees s/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-30 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. This has the potential to affect all the residents and visitors within the facility.The findings include:On 01/21/2026 at 8:35 AM, the surveyor did not observe a survey results binder in the front lobby. The surveyor requested the survey binder at the receptionist desk. Guest Services Staff #8 removed it from a cabinet behind the desk and stated that the desk was manned 24/7.A review of the survey binder on 01/21/2026 at 8:40 AM revealed it did not contain the most recent recertification survey. The Administrator stated that the survey binder was not current and committed to updating it immediately. On 01/21/2026 at 8:58 AM, the Administrator provided an updated survey binder and stated that the facility would keep it at the front desk.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-01-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the facility name and the total hours worked by staff on its Daily Staffing Schedule. This was evident for one (Vital Strong 1) of four units. The findings include: On 01/30/2026 at 7:45 AM, a review of the daily unit staffing and assignment form revealed that it did not include the facility name or the total number of hours worked by staff per shift.On 01/30/2026 at 7:52 AM, the surveyors observed a laminated report titled Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care posted in the lobby. The report displayed the date, licensed nursing staff ratio, and the unlicensed nursing staff ratio written with a dry-erase marker; however, the resident census was not posted in the lobby.On 01/30/26 at 9:45 AM, the surveyors conducted a record review of staffing documentation. The review revealed that on 12/28/2025 (day shift), 01/02/2026 (evening shift), and on 01/06/2026 (night shift), nursing hours were not listed for one of four units. On 01/30/2026 at 10:10 AM, surveyors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LJSW OPER 2013 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST67%since 08/01/2013
MILO PG LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 08/01/2013
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/29/2016
SPADARO, JOHNIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2018
PIPKIN, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2018
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2013
ATTMAN, LEONARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2013
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2013
FC OF PGPA INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2018
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$29.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.3M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 44%Other / private 56%

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$548per resident / day
operating cost
$16,654per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$581per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215364. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next