Future Care Pineview
9106 Pineview Lane, Clinton, MD 20735 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (410) 880-4353 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.8% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.8% | 22.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.8% | 25.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.2% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.6% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.3% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 302 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.4%CMS range 41.8–55.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.4%CMS range 11.9–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.3%CMS range 8.2–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 164.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of administrative and all pertinent documents, and interviews with facility staff members, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident #1's representative with a copy of the resident's medical record timely. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:On 12/30/25 the Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint concerning the facility not providing a copy of Resident #1's medical record after a written request. Review of complaint 2657295 on 01/12/26 at 10:30 am revealed an allegation that the facility failed to provide a copy of Resident #1's medical record when requested.Review of Resident #1's clinical record on 01/12/26 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has been deemed incapable of making all medical decisions by 2 physicians on 04/08/24.A review of the facility Access to PHI (protected health information) policy on 01/12/26 revealed that All requests should be submitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of medical records and all pertinent documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify 1) Resident #1's representative in a timely manner after a significant change occurred, and 2) immediately notify a resident's physician and representative when a resident developed tachycardia. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1 and #2) of 2 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/30/25 the Office of Health Care Quality received 2 complaints, 2657295 and #2704179, concerning the facility staff notifying Resident #1's representative when there was an issue with seeing a medical consultant. Review of Resident #1's clinical record on 01/12/26 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has been deemed incapable of making all medical decisions by 2 physicians on 04/08/24.Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a podiatry consult dated 08/28/2025 that indicated Resident #1 refused to be seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record and all pertinent documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a physician's orders to document the output from a Foley catheter was completed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Review of complaint 2618283 on 10/22/25 revealed an allegation Resident #1's Foley catheter was not working properly and Resident #1 had to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE].During review of complaint 2618283 on 10/22/25, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to a spinal cord injury, paraplegia, and an indwelling Foley catheter. On 08/20/25, Resident #1's physician instructed the nursing staff to Record Resident #1's Foley Output every Shift.Further review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed an August 2025 treatment administration record (TAR) that identified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents or family representatives with an opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive. This was evident for 6 (Residents #5, #6, #18, #37, #50 and #56) out of 9 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 07/31/25 at 7:22 AM, Resident #5's medical record was reviewed. During the medical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate an Advance Directives or evidence that an Advance Directive was offered to the resident or family representative.On 07/31/25 at 7:31 AM, Resident #6's medical record was reviewed. During the medical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate an Advance Directives or evidence that an Advance Directive was offered to the resident or family representative.On 07/31/25 at 7:37 AM, Resident #18's medical record was reviewed. During the medical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate an Advance Directives or evidence that an Advance Directive was offered to the resident or family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that the kitchen is clean and free of dirty dishes; 2) Ensure that the low temp dish wash machine maintained the required temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle; 3) Ensure that expired foods were discarded; 4) Remove all standing water located on the floor in the kitchen. This was found to be evident during an initial and follow-up tour of the kitchen survey has the potential to impact residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: An initial tour was conducted of the kitchen on 7/30/25 at 07:55 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) Staff # 11 present. The following concerns were identified: 1. A staff member was observed washing dishes in the 3-Compartment Sink. Next to the sink there was a large puddle of water observed on the floor. A fly was observed in the area that landed on the wall inside the kitchen along with several knats flying around.During a follow-up visit to the kitchen on 8/4/25 at 11:30AM, an observation was made of a large puddle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to: 1) accurately reflect on its facility matrix the number of residents on transmissions precautions, and/or contact precautions, and/or the number of facility acquired pressure ulcers and/or pressure ulcers acquired during a resident's admission. This was evident to be true for the three submissions of the facility matrix presented to the survey team; 2) The facility failed to document the start times on the continuous tube feeding bag. This was evident for 1 (Resident #166) of 2 residents with continuous tube feedings; 3) update residents infection control status in the electronic medical record. This was evident for 3 resident rooms (Resident #4, #14, and #162's room) out of 24 resident rooms screened on the second floor and 4) initiate an order and complete documentation for the use of resting hand splints. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) out of 6 residents reviewed for position/range of motion. The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) completed required annual in-service training timely. This was evident for 3 (GNA #16, #31, and #34) out of 4 employee records reviewed for required in-service training during the annual survey. The findings include:On 8/7/2025 at 9:15AM, the Surveyor reviewed the employee files of 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants, GNA #16, #31, #34, and #35. A review of GNA #16, #31, and #34 employee files failed to reveal timely completion of annual in-service training courses due every 12 months for 2024 and 2025.On 8/7/2025 at 1:00PM, during an interview with Regional Clinical Nurse #4, the Surveyor requested copies of the GNA's assigned in-service courses for 2024 and 2025. A review of the Student Assignment Completion Report with a due date range of 1/1/2024 through 8/6/2025 revealed that GNA #16, #31, and #34 had incomplete required in-service training for 2024 and 2025.The Surveyor expressed the concern that the GNA's were non-compliant with completing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment in residents' rooms. This was evident for 3 out of 26 rooms observed during the survey.The findings include:On 7/30/25 at 8:05 AM, during the initial observation of the 3rd floor, identifiable wall damage was found in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. There were multiple areas where the baseboard was coming off the walls, and the door protectors were cracked and peeling off the door itself.On 7/31/25 at 7:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to accompany the surveyor to the 3rd floor to review the identifiable wall damage to the walls and baseboards. The DON saw the areas that needed to be repaired and stated that she would notify maintenance. The DON took pictures of all the areas reviewed with the surveyor and sent them to her team.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined the facility failed to: 1) develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's preference for future discharge. This was determined to be true for 1 (Resident #14) out of 34 residents reviewed for discharge planning ; 2) develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's need for oral hygiene care while on a NPO status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #34) out of 2 residents reviewed for a comprehensive care plan; 3) follow the resident care plan of ensuring that a resident who is dependent on staff for assistance with transfers receives assistance out of bed. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 3) of 46 residents reviewed; 4) develop a person-centered care plan for a resident who had a diagnosis of insomnia. This was evident for 1 (Resident #72) out of 9 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) out of 37 resident care plans reviewed during the survey.The findings include:1. A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care while in the facility. Restorative Nursing Program is a program that aims to help residents in skilled nursing facilities achieve and maintain their highest possible level of independent function. The program is tailored to each resident's specific needs and abilities. Restorative interventions include range of motion exercises both active (where the resident moves their own limbs) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene care to residents with nothing by mouth (NPO) status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #34) out of 2 residents observed during the survey.On 8/01/2025 at 9:40 AM, while speaking with Resident #34, the surveyor noted the resident's breath smelled badly and their mouth was very dry, and their lips were cracked. On 8/04/2025 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #34 alert and smiling, and that Resident #34's lips were dry and cracked. After leaving the resident, the surveyor went to speak with the GNA who works with the resident. GNA #32 was asked if she does oral hygiene care for the residents who are NPO. GNA #32 responded that she does oral care when she does her ADLs in the morning with the resident and again in the afternoon before leaving for the day. The surveyor then went to speak with the nurse for the resident. The surveyor asked Staff #33 if they provide oral hygiene care for the resident, and he stated that they do it at least once a shift. On 8/04/2025 at 11:45 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents, the facility failed to prepare meals that were attractive, flavorful, and appetizing to the residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #59 and #151) residents out of 5 interviewed for meals during survey. On 7/30/2025 at 11:31 AM, the surveyor spoke with Resident #151 about the food at the facility. Resident #151 stated that the food just isn't that good. I don't eat most of my meals. Resident #151 was unable to provide examples of what they meant. On 8/01/2025 at 1:45 PM, Resident #59 was interviewed about the food at the facility. Resident #59 complained that the food is terrible, with no taste. Resident #59 also stated that they (the facility) need someone better to cook the food. It's either not cooked enough or overcooked. On 8/05/2025 at 12:26 PM, the surveyor visited Resident #151 to find that they were not happy with their lunch. They stated that they always get the same stuff that they don't like. It doesn't look appetizing or taste good. I get the alternative lunch most times. A salad or a PBJ sandwich. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention policies and procedures were carried out by its employees. This was determined to be true for one (Resident #86) out of six residents reviewed for infection control and prevention during the survey. The findings include: On 07/31/2025 at 1:55 PM, Resident #8 and Resident #86 were observed lying in their beds. The surveyor observed during a tour of the 2nd floor clinical unit that Resident# 86's door was open and that an employee was engaged in conversation with Resident #86. The surveyor observed that there were two isolation signs posted on room door. The posted signs were contact isolation and enhanced barrier precautions. The surveyor observed that Staff #26, physical therapy assistant, was not wearing an isolation gown while speaking to Resident #86 and was observed touching the resident's linens during the conversation. Staff #26 came to the open doorway of the room and asked if she could assist the surveyor before returning to the bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-26 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of residents medical records, facility COVID-19 testing documentation, facility policy interview with facility staff, and interview with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and follow a system of testing residents for COVID-19 according to the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the facility's own policies during an outbreak of COVID-19. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: A line listing is an infection prevention and control tool that is used to track individuals who may have actively infectious disease. It lists each potentially infectious individual and includes information such as date of symptom onset, a list of symptoms, results of testing, and treatments given to address the potentially infectious disease. It is common practice to maintain a distinct line listing for a specific infectious disease when an organization is experiencing an outbreak. The survey, which took place between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents and policies it was determined that the facility failed to take appropriate actions to thoroughly investigate and follow up on a reported allegation of abuse (Resident # 14). This was evident for 1 of 2 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed. The findings include: On 10/06/22 at 09:30 AM, review of the Facility Reported Investigation (FRI) MD00173298 and complaint investigation report MD00173683 revealed the allegation that 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) were rough with Resident #14 while they were providing ADL care. In the report, on 10/19/21, Resident #14 reported that over the weekend while 2 GNA's were working with him/her, they were rough with her/him while providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Activities of daily living are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating. Although the FRI was not specific to a day or shift, or the identity of the accused, 4 staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents and policies it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse or create a safe environment by failing to implement the facility policy on abuse as evidenced by failing to complete in-services on all employees after alleged incidents of abuse occurred in the facility, failing to appropriately investigate an allegation of abuse, and failing to follow-up with a resident grievance. This was found to be true in 1 (Resident #14) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse investigations. The findings include: On 10/06/22 at 09:30 AM, surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Investigation (FRI) MD00173298 and complaint investigation report MD00173683 regarding the allegation of 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) were rough with Resident #14 while they were providing ADL care. In the report, on 10/19/21, Resident #14 reported that over the weekend while 2 GNAs were working with him/her, they were rough with her/him while providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility policy and training record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse as evidenced by failing to complete in-services on all employees after alleged incidents of abuse occurred in the facility. This was evident during the review of 1 of 2 of 2 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) on abuse. The findings include: On 10/06/2022 at 09:30 AM Surveyor reviewed an FRI MD00173298 that was reported on 10/19/21 regarding an allegation of abuse. After the facility completed their investigation, the allegation was unsubstantiated. Further review found 4 staff members (Staff#39, Staff #41, Staff #44, and Staff#55) were identified to be directly involved in the incident. During an interview with the Administrator, s/he indicated that the four staff members listed received abuse in-service related to the incident. However, a review of the abuse in-services attendance records related to the incident provided to the survey team failed to show Staff #41, Staff #44, and Staff #55 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents and policies it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an abuse allegation. This was evident for 2 of 9 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed. The findings include: 1. On 10/06/22 at 09:30 AM, review of the facility reported investigation revealed the allegation of 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) were rough with Resident #14 while they were providing ADL care. In the report, on 10/19/21, Resident #14 reported that over the weekend while 2 GNA's were working with him/her, they were rough with her/him while providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Activities of daily living are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating. Although the FRI was not specific to a day or shift, or the identity of the accused, 4 staff members; 3 from the day shift (Staff #39, Staff#41 and Staff #44) and 1 member from night shift (Staff #55) were the only staff interviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents or their responsible party and the local Ombudsman, received written notification of a transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (Resident #58 and Resident #105) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record on 10/11/2022 7:21 AM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 7/2022 with several medical diagnoses. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was transferred to the hospital on two occasions, 9/8/2022 and on 10/1/2022. The resident was transferred to the hospital on 9/8/2022 due to a dislodged jejunal tube. The second transfer occurred on 10/1/2022 due to Altered Mental Status. During review of Resident #58's transfer documentation for both transfers, written notification of the resident transfers to the Resident #58's responsible party and the local Ombudsman were not located. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised as required. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #28 and Resident #64) out of 33 residents reviewed for care plans during the Annual Survey. The findings include: 1. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) diabetes is a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces. Insulin is a hormone that regulates blood glucose. Hyperglycemia, also called raised blood glucose or raised blood sugar, is a common effect of uncontrolled diabetes and over time leads to serious damage to many of the body's systems, especially the nerves and blood vessels. During an interview with Resident #28 on 10/02/2022 at approximately 9:29 AM, the resident stated s/he received insulin for the treatment of diabetes. A review of resident #28's medical record confirmed the resident was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus. A review of resident #28's physician orders conducted on 10/06/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with staff, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an intervention, determined to be necessary, for a resident who was identified as a fall risk. This was evident of 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for accidents during the annual survey. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed Resident #18's medical record on 10/7/22 at 8:30 AM. This review revealed that resident #18 was admitted to the facility in early 2022 with diagnoses that include hyperlipidemia, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, and dysphagia. Review of Section B of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident did not speak, was rarely or never understood, and rarely/never understood others. Further review of Resident #18's medical record revealed a progress note dated 9/23/22 that described an unwitnessed fall that the resident had sustained. The surveyor reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with staff and review of medical records and the facility's policies, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for a resident by failing to implement nutritional recommendations and, 2) effectively address significant weight loss. This was evident of 1 of 11 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. This deficient practice affected a resident who had consistent weight loss throughout a two-month stay. The findings include: Significant weight change is defined as a gain or loss of 5% of a person's weight within 30 days, 7.5% within 90 days or 10% within 180 days. Significant weight change requires clinical evaluation and, if the change is not beneficial, intervention. 1. On 10/12/22 at 11:22 AM, review of Resident #62's medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in August 2022, and resided in the facility for approximately 2 months. Further review of Resident #62's medical record revealed that Resident #62 had the following weights recorded: 8/5/22: admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with staff and review of residents' medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatments to prevent complications for a resident who required enteral nutrition. This was evident by the facility replacing a resident's gastrostomy tube without appropriate physician's orders and failing to document that gastrostomy tube placement. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for tube feeding during the annual survey. The findings include: Enteral nutrition, also known as tube feeding, is a way to deliver dietary needs directly to the stomach or small intestine. A gastrostomy tube or (g-tube) is used when nutrition is delivered to your stomach. A common g-tube placed is called a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. This is done by a surgical procedure. The tract of the tube can take a month to form and in some people this process can take longer. If the tube is removed or accidentally dislodged before the heeling process is finished, the medical professional should replace the tube to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to complete a risk assessment prior to the use of the siderails. This was evident of 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #18) reviewed for accidents during an annual survey. The findings include: Bedrails also known as side rails are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them, such as suffocation, entrapment, and psychological risks. A risk assessment is required to evaluate the resident's risk of entrapment before the use of bedrails. Review of Resident #18's medical record on 10/7/22 at 8:30AM revealed that Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in early 2022 with diagnoses that include but not were not limited to hyperlipidemia, cerebra infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was properly prepared for residents with a diet order for pureed food. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who received pureed food. The findings include: Pureed foods are a type of texture of food that helps with problems related to difficulty in chewing and swallowing. A pureed diet consists of foods that are blended, whipped, or mashed until they are a pudding-like texture. During an observation conducted on 10/04/2022 at approximately 11:30 AM of the steam table and tray line, the Surveyor requested a test sample of the pureed roast beef served for lunch. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2022 approximately 11:45 AM, the Dietary Manger #9 confirmed the kitchen prepared the pureed food. On 10/04/2022 at approximately 12:10 PM the pureed roast beef was tasted by a surveyor who determined the pureed roast beef was not completely pureed, it had concerning sizable pieces of meat mixed in with the pureed meat. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview with Resident #76 the facility failed to deliver low carbohydrate diet recommended for a Resident #76 with diabetes. This was evident for 2 of 3 (Resident #76) residents reviewed for preferences during the survey. Findings include: On 10/02/22 09:58 AM, an interview has held with Resident #76 who had food sitting on the tray table in front of him/her. Resident #76 stated the food was cold and inedible. Resident #76 also stated the carts with the trays sit outside the rooms because there were not enough staff to distribute trays and the kitchen does not serve enough green leafy vegetables and too many starches for a diabetic resident. In addition, Resident #76 indicated he/she cannot read the menu as his/her eyes are bad and he/she cannot write what she wants to eat and does not receive assistance from the staff. Interview with the facility Dietician on 10/2/22 at 9:58 AM confirmed the resident was to receive a low carbohydrate diet. The Dietician stated she would check with the kitchen to make sure Resident #76 was receiving the proper diet.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and observation it was determined the facility failed to provide food at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 10/03/2022 the survey team requested a breakfast test tray for 10/05/2022 based on random complaints from about the taste and flavoring of the food provided by the facility. A breakfast tray was presented to the survey team on 10/04/2022 at approximately 8:50 AM. The breakfast tray consisted of an unshelled boiled egg, 2 breakfast sausage links, oatmeal, orange juice, cranberry juice and a carton of milk. The temperature of the breakfast sausage link temperature was observed at 100 degrees Fahrenheit, the oatmeal temperature was observed at 122 degrees Fahrenheit, the boiled egg temperature was observed at 98 degrees Fahrenheit, orange juice temperature was observed at 44 degrees Fahrenheit, cranberry temperature was observed at 52 degrees Fahrenheit, and milk temperature was observed at 44 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared by the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted on 10/03/2022 at approximately 7:30 AM, the Surveyor and Dietary Manager # 9 observed 2 Quaker Grits containers opened and undated, 1 box of Belgium waffle mix opened and undated, and 1 box of Hungry [NAME] complete pancake mix opened and undated in the walk-in refrigerator. An interview conducted on 10/03/2022 at approximately 7:32 AM, the Dietary Manager # 9 confirmed the facility's policy was to securely close packages/bags once opened, write an open date, use by date, and use a date format of month, day and year. During the continued tour of the kitchen, the Surveyor and Dietary Manager #9 observed 3 bags of unopened Raviolis laying without an expiration date on the bottom right shelf of the walk-in freezer. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that facility staff wore face masks, respirators, and face shields in an appropriate manner during a COVID-19 outbreak. This was evident on 3 of 18 days of the annual survey. The findings include: The annual survey was conducted from 10/2/22 to 10/26/22, during an outbreak of COVID-19 at the facility among staff and residents. On 10/3/22 at 7:30 AM, the surveyor observed two kitchen staff working the tray line in the kitchen. They were transferring food from containers in a steam table onto resident plates. They were noted to be wearing surgical masks but, although the masks covered the staff members' mouths, the masks were below both of their noses. On 10/3/22 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP, Staff #10). During the interview, the IP stated that all staff were currently expected to wear at least a surgical mask at all times while in the facility. The IP indicated that staff who were working on nursing units with residents who recently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of insects. This was found to be evident for the kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/04/2022 at approximately 7:30 AM, the Surveyor and Dietary Manager #9 observed a cockroach crawling up the wall above the sink in the dishwasher room. Several gnats were observed flying around all of the meal carts located in an area with puddles of standing water. The food traps observed during the tour were observed with vegetables and macaroni noodles. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2022 at approximately 7:32 AM the Dietary Manger # 9 stated the kitchen is routinely exterminated for pest, the standing puddles of water in the area where the meal carts are kept was from the staff that rinsed the floors, and the food traps should have been cleaned. The Dietary Manager #9 stated he understood standing water and unclean food traps has the potential to attract pest such as gnats and cockroaches. On 10/04/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. This was evident in 3 out of 40 resident's rooms with spa shower room on the 3rd floor nursing unit during the survey process. The findings include: On 01/08/19 at 9:30 A.M. the surveyor observed on the 3rd floor nursing unit within the resident's spa shower room, broken tiles with the exposed steel support panel on the interior corner wall. On that same day at 9: 40 A.M., the surveyor was accompanied by staff member #2 who measured the missing wall guard tile. It measured to 14 inches with broken off plaster on the wall corner. The guard edge separated the bathroom to the resident showers. On 01/08/19 at 10:17 A.M. during observations in room [ROOM NUMBER] the surveyor observed in the personal bathroom that the shower floor had visible red, black, and brown dirt stains covering the entire shower floor. The resident stated that the facility had not cleaned the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview with resident and responsible party, the facility failed to provide a water cup for Resident # 11 or refill his water cup consistently. This was evident for 1 out of 40 residents observed during the interview and observational part of the survey process. The findings include: On 1/8/19 at 10 A.M., this surveyor met with Resident # 11 and conducted an interview. The resident was able to answer all questions. The resident stated at that time, that he wanted a glass of water to drink. The surveyor noticed there was no water cup in the room and asked the unit secretary to get him a glass of water. The resident has a history of Chronic Kidney disease among other diagnoses. A Basic Metabolic panel was done on 12/1/18 and was abnormal. The Bun (Blood Urea Nitrogen) was high at 55 and creatine was high at 2.51. The physician was aware, and no new orders were given. The resident is total care and must be fed during all meals and liquids. All ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) are done for the resident. On 1/9/18 at 3P.M., again there was no water cup in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a bathroom faucet mechanism used in the room of Resident #74 was in proper working condition. This was evident in 1 of 4 rooms where handwashing was observed. The findings include: On 1/11/19 at 2:49 PM while observing staff #1 washing her hands in the room of Resident #74, it was noted the water was not shutting off properly. Staff #1 was observed pressing down on the double faucet handles and then putting her hands under the faucet to begin the handwashing process. The water ran for a few seconds and then shut itself off. Staff #1 repeatedly touched the faucets handles with her hands to turn the water back on, but the water always went off after a few seconds. On 1/16/19 at about 1:30 PM during an interview with the Director of Environmental Services, he stated the type of mechanism used on this sink was a metering sink faucet. Per Law Insider Contract database and search engine at https://www.lawinsider.com, a metering sink faucet is defined as: .a fitting that when turned on, will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-26 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a list of all staff persons and identify their COVID-19 vaccination status as vaccinated, exempt, non-exempt, or temporarily delayed. The findings include: On 10/14/22 at 1:59 PM, the surveyor obtained a COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Log from the Infection Preventionist (IP, staff #10), a tool required for compliance with federal regulation for determining the vaccination status of all facility employees. The vaccination log was noted to only contain a list of staff who had been vaccinated. No column on the tool allowed for documentation if a staff person was exempt from vaccination for religious or medical reasons, or if a staff person was pending vaccination. On 10/18/22, the IP provided the survey team with two religious exemptions for COVID-19 vaccination. These two staff persons were not included on the COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Log. A list of all facility staff had been obtained from the facility on 10/3/22, the second day of survey. On 10/19/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-10-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of resident medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to identify a reason for declination for influenza and pneumonia vaccinations offered to residents. This was evident for 6 of 6 declination forms reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 10/18/22 at 1:42 PM, the surveyor sampled five resident for review of influenza (flu) and pneumonia vaccination. Of the five sampled residents, two residents (Resident #145 and #111) declined vaccinations. Both residents declined to receive the flu vaccine as well as both pneumonia vaccines (one 13-valent and another 23-valent). The forms were obtained from the residents' medical records. The forms had decline checked off but did not check any of the boxes to indicate the reason for the declination.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEFFREY ATTMON TRUST UA DTD 122686 ATTMON PHYLLIS TTEE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 06/01/2009 |
| POWERS, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 12/01/2025 |
| ALVIN POWERS RESIDUARY TRUST FBO JEFFREY POWERS | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| ALVIN POWERS RESIDUARY TRUST FBO MARK POWERS | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| POWERS, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| ATTMAN, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| ATTMAN, LEONARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| FINGLASS, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| FUTURE CARE HEALTH & MANAGEMENT OF PINEVIEW INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| SPADARO, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2013 |
| CLINTON NURSING HOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/19/2025 |
| LAG ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| LEONARD J ATTMAN TR UA FBO WENDE ATTMAN PHYLLIS TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| SHELLYE ATTMAN GILDEN TR UA DTD ATTMAN PHYLLIS TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| ATTMAN, JEFFREY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| GILDEN, SHELLYE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
| LEVITAS, WENDE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2009 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215328. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.