No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Future Care Canton Harbor

1300 South Ellwood Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224 · For profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (410) 342-6644 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 342-6644 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$13,627 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,627 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-12)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3601 O'Donnell Street, Suite 150 · (410) 633-6300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2760 Lighthouse Pt E Ste 110 · (410) 276-7586 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2701 Lighthouse Pt E · (410) 558-0390 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1213 S Ellwood Ave · (410) 396-7900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3100 Boston St · (443) 632-4104

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.8%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.5%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.0%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.6%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.7%13.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.7%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.141.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.671.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 226 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.5%CMS range 51.8–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 9.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge85.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 5.0–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
38.0%
Total nursing turnover
18.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 152.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-18)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (resident #1) from physical abuse from a facility staff member. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. This failure to protect residents from physical abuse by a facility staff member resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. However, the facility developed, initiated, and completed an acceptable plan of correction to prevent further abuse which met all elements of past noncompliance. The period of noncompliance began on 2/12/24 and ended on 2/20/2024. The findings include: The following terms are defined for comprehension of the investigative findings: Minimum Data Set (MDS): The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive assessment of a resident completed by facility staff. The MDS is a multi-discipline tool that allows many facets of the resident's care [cognition, behavior, mobility, activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' personal health information from being publicly displayed. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident # 4, # 30, and # 136) of 3 residents observed with Covid precaution signs posted during the facility's survey.Findings include: An observation was made of the 100-unit hallway on 9/15/25 at 9:00AM and the following concerns were identified:On the entrance doorway leading into Resident # 4 and Resident # 131's room, there was a sign posted indicating the following information: Stop Covid Precautions. Keep door closed. Additional instructions on personal protective equipment were also on the posted sign.On the entrance doorway leading into Resident # 30 room, there was a sign posted indicating the following information: Stop Covid Precautions. Keep door closed. Additional instructions on personal protective equipment were also on the posted sign.On the entrance doorway leading into Resident # 136 room, there was a sign posted indicating the following information:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews with the resident family and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation of a resident refusal to get out of bed. This was found to be evident during observations of 1 (Resident # 6) of 2 residents reviewed for activities during the survey.Findings include:Based on record review, Resident # 6 had the following but not limited diagnosis: Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (Stroke)On 9/15/25 at 8:45 AM an observation was made of Resident # 6 lying in bed in the bedroom. No activities were observed. Another observation was made on the same date at 12:30PM and the resident was lying in the bed in the bedroom. No activities were observed.During a family interview conducted on 9/15/25 at 2:17 PM the family expressed concerns about staff not getting the resident out of bed. The family went on to say that they visited Resident # 6 the prior weekend, and the resident was lying in bed. They stated that there was no wheelchair available, so they were unable to take the resident out of the room during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of active and closed medical records, reviews of the residents' electronic medical records, and interviews with staff members, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident in 3 (Resident #2, #6, #10) of 11 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) A review of complaint MD00204530 on [DATE] revealed an allegation Resident #2 was not being provided incontinence care timely. A review of Resident #2's closed medical record revealed that Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted to the facility on [DATE] due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint and reviews of a closed medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order to administer an antibiotic for 3 days, a total of 6 doses. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 11 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A review of complaint MD00213834 on 03/27/25 revealed an allegation Resident #6 was not receiving quality care and not being cared for properly. A review of Resident #6's closed medical record revealed that Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-surgical orthopedic procedure due to a fractured right ankle and cystitis with pyuria. A review of Resident #6's closed medical record on 03/27/25 at 12 PM revealed a physician order dated 01/18/25 at 9 AM instructing the nursing staff to administer the antibiotic, Cefpodoxime Proextill, 100 mg, orally, every 12 hours for cystitis for 3 days. A review of Resident #6's January 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a closed medical record, reviews of the resident's electronic medical records, and interviews with facility staff members, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) update a resident's skin and wound care plan after being readmitted with actual stage II wounds, 2) document a resident's assessment timely demonstrating the healing or deterioration of a resident's Stage II wounds, and notifying the resident's physician and family of the resident's stage II wounds. This was evident in 1 (Resident #2) of 11 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III ( full-thickness skin loss involving damage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to report the alleged abuse of a cognitively impaired resident (resident #1) to the proper authorities. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The following terms are defined for comprehension of the investigative findings: Minimum Data Set (MDS): The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive assessment of a resident completed by facility staff. The MDS is a multi-discipline tool that allows many facets of the resident's care [cognition, behavior, mobility, activities of daily living, accidents, activities, weight, pain, and medications to name a few] to be addressed. The MDS assessment is part of the broader Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. The RAI process ties the assessment and care plan to the delivery of care to meet the needs of the resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/11/2024 at 9:30 AM, review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), MD00202778, revealed that Resident #2's sister reported on 2/19/2024 that the resident told her a couple of weeks ago that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA # 11) told him/her To shut up and was rough with care. Further review of the facility investigation report of the incident on 4/11/2024 at 11:00 AM, revealed that there were interviews /statements from staff and other residents. However, some of the interview statements on file did not indicate the titles nor identify the persons completing the forms and/or the date the statements were obtained. There was no interview statement of the resident, resident's roommate and/or statements from other residents. The investigation was not thorough. On 4/11/2024 at 12:50 PM, in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on tour, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to secure and monitor chemicals in an active resident area. This was evident during a random tour on the 3rd floor of the facility. The findings include: During a tour on the 3rd floor of the facility at 12:44 PM on 4/11/24 revealed a maintenance cart with 4 cans of Ultra Power Foam for stripping and cleaning the floors. It was observed and noted at this time that multiple rooms were being deep cleaned. An additional can of the Ultra Power Foam was sitting on the railing next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. This surveyor continued observations through 12:53 PM when the facility Assistant Director of Nursing arrived on the floor and made the same observations. The chemicals remained on the floor as 2 residents were observed rolling down the hall. Resident #6 stopped at all the items and stated 'wow there is a lot of stuff here.' Their medical records were reviewed on 4/12/24 at 10:20 AM. Resident #6 was documented with a brief interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This was evident for 6 (#4, #21, #57, #55, #106, & 455) out 21 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) During review of a FRI on 9/11/23 at 9:00 AM, the surveyors found interviews of 5 residents cared for by Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) # 40), a staff member under investigation for allegations of abuse. The report of the resident's interviews stated GNA # 40 was not physically abusive to them however the interview comments read: Resident # 4 stated, it is GNA # 40's way or no way, Resident # 57 stated GNA # 40 is not good to work with and sometimes rude, Resident # 21 stated, I feel that GNA # 40 is mad at me, she is not always polite and does not socialize with me. No follow-up was found in the FRI regarding these comments. During an interview on 9/14/23 at 7:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was shown the above report of the statements made by residents regarding GNA # 40. The DON was asked what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to serve food at appetizing temperatures. This was evident during 1 of 1 food test tray samples reviewed during an annual survey. The finding include: On 9/15/23 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's kitchen staff assemble food trays for the lunch mealtime. The surveyor requested a sample tray be placed on the food cart that was scheduled to be delivered to the 1st floor. Further observation revealed a log of recorded temperatures taken from the foods that were contained on the steam table assembly line in preparation for the lunch meal. The temperatures were: Entrée (Chicken Salad)- 37 degrees Fahrenheit (F) Vegetable (buttered beets)- 37 degrees F Soup (Cream of Broccoli)- 198 degrees F Mechanical soft meat- 41 degrees F Pureed Meat -30 degrees F Pureed Vegetable- 38 degrees F Dessert- 41 degrees F Juice- 41 degrees F On 9/15/23 at 12:33 PM, the surveyor observed the food cart delivered to the 1st floor. On 9/15/23 at 12:46 PM, all the trays were delivered and only the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with facility staff and review of facility records it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety, and 2) keep complete kitchen records. This was found evident of 1 of 4 kitchen observation and 2 of 3 kitchen record reviews during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/28/23 at 8:35 AM, the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. The surveyor observed the facility's Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) Staff #10 walk into the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator. The surveyor conducted an interview at this time. Staff #10 stated she usually comes to the kitchen in the morning to check the dates labeled on the food. The surveyor asked Staff #10 what was in the square clear container on the shelf. Staff #10 stated it was pudding and that it was just made but agreed it had no label to indicate what it was or when it was made. Staff #10 explained that different items have different discard dates depending on the product. The date that it was received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This finding was evident for 2 of 4 residents (#103 and #146) review for care plan. The findings include: 1) During an interview conducted on 8/29/23 at 10:45 AM, Resident #103 stated that he/she was upset because the staff did not provide continent care when needed and had been left soiled for long periods of time. The resident further stated that when my son came to visit he would change my soiled diaper routinely. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strength and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 9/11/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to provide an explanation in the resident's medical record to demonstrate the absence of the resident from their care plan meetings and 2) update a resident's care plan to reflect a new diagnosis with recommended treatments. This was evident for 1 (Resident #99) out of 3 residents reviewed for care planning during the investigation portion of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. In a care plan meeting, staff and residents/families talk about life in the facility-meals, activities, therapies, personal schedule, medical and nursing care, and emotional needs. Residents/families can bring up problems, ask questions, or offer information to help staff provide care. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment is a 15-point cognitive screening used to screen and identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and resident record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide scheduled showers to residents. This was evident of 2 of 2 residents (Resident #398 and #108) reviewed for Activities of Daily Life (ADL) care on an annual and complaint survey. The finding include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are everyday routine activities that are done to take care of oneself. 1a) On 8/28/23 at 12:13 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #398. During this interview Resident #398 stated that they had been here over a week and hadn't gotten a shower. On 9/5/23 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #398's electronic medical record. This review revealed that Resident #389 had been admitted to the facility in the middle of August 2023 and had a past medical history that included, difficulty in walking, weakness, history of falling, and cerebral infarction (disruption of blood flow to the brain). On 9/6/23 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor interviewed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) Staff #22. During this interview Staff # 22 stated the GNA's are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure skin alterations were documented in the medical record. This was evident for 1 (#451) of 65 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. It was determined that the facility's failure to document the skin alterations resulted in past non-compliance which existed from 01/12/2023 until 01/29/2023. The findings include: On 09/12/2023 at 9:00 AM, a record review revealed that on 01/18/2023 the facility received a complaint from Resident #451's son alleging that the resident had obtained a wound on [his/her] right hip where a previous wound had been healed. When investigating the concern, facility staff members were interviewed. Staff #59 recalled that Resident #451's right hip had a dark spot, like a bruise. Staff #61 also remembered a dark area on the right hip. Staff #61 stated that it wasn't new and that it was darker but was there before. Staff #60, a nurse that cared for Resident #451 on the day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for oxygen administration. This was found evident of 1 out of 5 (Resident #128) residents reviewed for respiratory care during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: Pulse oximeter - a device that uses a light source to analyze the light that passes through a finger and can determine the percentage of oxygen in the red blood cells, referred to as a pulse ox. Nasal cannula- a medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels. On 8/30/23 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #41 resting in bed noted to have oxygen being delivered via nasal cannula. On 9/6/23 at 8:58 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #128's medical records. The review revealed that Resident #128 was admitted to the facility in early 2022 and had a past medical history of, acute pulmonary edema (fluid on the lungs), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), and lung cancer. Further review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medications consistent with professional standards. This was found evident of 1 of 5 (Resident # 41) residents reviewed for pain management during the annual survey. The findings include: On 8/31/23 at 12:41 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #41's medical record. The review revealed Resident #41 had a past medical history of polyneuropathy (multiple nerves damaged causing pain in different areas of the body), surgical amputation, diabetes type 2 with foot ulcer and muscle weakness. A care plan is a guide that addresses the needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Further review of the record revealed Resident #41 had a care plan for chronic pain related to diabetic neuropathy (damaged nerves that cause pain) and arthritis. On 9/5/23 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #41's hospital discharge summaries. The review revealed a hospital discharge summary from a hospital stay Resident #41 had in early July 2023. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store medication in a locked compartment. This was found evident on 2 of 2 random observations. The findings include: 1) This surveyor observed on the second floor an unlocked medication cart on 9/6/23 at 10:42 AM. The cart was located by room [ROOM NUMBER] and across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Five different staff members, including nursing staff, walked past the cart without securing it. They continued down the hallway without maintaining eye contact with the medication cart. Staff at the nursing station were not looking at the cart. There were no residents in the vicinity. This surveyor checked the drawers at 10:57 AM. Every medication except the controlled substances which were in a locked drawer within the cart were accessible. A nurse (Staff #37) walked up to the cart at 10:58 AM and locked it. This surveyor approached and informed her that the cart has been under observation. I asked if it was her assigned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices and guidelines were followed. This was found to be evident for 3 (resident #474, 475 and #110) out of 65 residents reviewed for infection control. The findings include: 1) On 08/31/23 at 09:28 AM, an observation was conducted in Resident #475's room. The Surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #8 obtain Resident #474's blood pressure. She (#8) did not disinfect the shared blood pressure cuff prior to taking Resident #475's blood pressure. During an interview conducted on 08/31/23 at 09:35 AM, the surveyor asked GNA #8 how she provided infection control when using a shared blood pressure cuff. The GNA admitted that she did not apply the infection control practices properly in terms of disinfecting the shared blood pressure cuff. An interview with the Regional Clinical Service Manager (RCSM, Staff #5) on 08/31/23 at 11:18 AM confirmed that the expectation was for all staff to consistently apply the infection control practices on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, observation and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans with measurable goals. This was evident for 12 (#38, #51, #53, #81, #127, #132, #6, #90, #130, #25, #59, #31) of 40 residents reviewed. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Upon introduction and interview on 1/25/19 at 8:30 AM, resident #38 indicated that he/she was waiting for glasses. At the time, resident #38 was not wearing glasses and indicated that the television was blurry. Review of the resident's medical record on 1/29/19 revealed that resident #38 was seen by an ophthalmologist on 3/21/18. The consultant ophthalmology report indicated issues with the resident's left eye and prescribed medicated drops with follow-up in 6-months. Review of resident #38's care plans revealed a care plan related to impaired visual function, dated 3/13/18. One of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to perform appropriate revision to care plan goals and interventions as resident care needs became apparent or changed over time. This was evident for 6 (# 48, #53, #27, #110, #25, #437) of 40 residents reviewed. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 1/25/19 at 12:57 AM, an observation of Resident #48 revealed that the resident had a contracture (shortening of a muscle or joint) of both hands. Review of Resident #48's physician orders revealed that a 9/16/18 order for bilateral hand splints was discontinued on 11/28/18. On 1/30/19 at 3:51 PM, during an interview, Staff #34 stated that Resident #48 recently received OT and it was determined that hand splints were no longer needed. Review of Resident #48's care plans revealed a care plan Alteration in musculoskeletal status r/t (related to) contracture of bilateral upper extremities which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-02-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, observations and review of the medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program based on repeat deficiencies related to ensuring a resident's dignity, accurate comprehensive assessments and the facilities ineffective QAA program. The findings include: On 2/1/19 at 3:01 PM, review of the Quality Assurance Program with Staff #13 revealed that effective processes had not been put in place regarding repeat deficiencies. The facility's action plans did not resolve quality deficiencies identified during the last recertification survey, which was concluded on 9/22/17, with a plan of correction date of 11/6/17. Dignity and respect of individuality, comprehensive assessments and having an effective quality assurance program were cited during the annual survey on 9/22/19. Effective processes were not put in place to correct the deficiencies. Cross Reference F557, F636. During an interview, when asked about the QA process put into place following the prior deficiencies, Staff #13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to ensure access to the nurse call bell for a resident who was dependent on nursing staff due to impaired mobility and 2) failed to ensure access to be able to turn the over the bed light on and off. This was evident for 5 (#51, #127, #6, #90, #388) of 32 residents observed in the initial resident pool. The findings include: 1) An interview was conducted with Resident #51 on 1/25/19 at 9:28 AM. During the interview, the resident was asked to activate the call light, so the surveyor could make sure the call light worked. Resident #51 looked around and saw the call bell cord clipped to the privacy curtain on the left side of the bed and stated that he/she could not reach the call bell cord. The surveyor advised Staff #28. Review of Resident #51's care plan, ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t impaired balance had the approach encourage the use of bell to call for assistance. The care plan at risk for falls r/t gait/balance problems had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident for 15 of 35 resident rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Surveyor observed two stained ceiling tiles above the window in room [ROOM NUMBER], on 1/24/19 at 10:02 AM. Additionally, there was a separation between the wood molding by the window, with exposure of rough wood along the separation. The filter of the heating /air conditioning unit was exposed and hanging down to the floor, with noted dust accumulations. 2) On 1/24/19 at 11:09 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], observation revealed that the window ledge above the b-bed was separating from the wall, with additional wall damage noted behind the bed. 3) On 1/24/19 at 11:09 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], observation revealed that the cover of the heating/AC unit was off the unit and sitting on the floor, exposing the insides of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct an accurate, comprehensive assessment by failing to assess a resident's cognition and mood on comprehensive MDS assessments and failing to accurately code a resident's dental status. This was evident for 7 (#6, #130, #110, #31, #42, #51, #53) of 40 residents reviewed. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. The findings include: 1) On 1/25/19 at 9:28 AM, observation of Resident #6 revealed the resident did not have any teeth. Review of Resident #6's annual comprehensive assessment with and assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/20/18 revealed Section L0200. Dental was coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct an accurate assessment by failing to assess a resident's cognition and mood on quarterly MDS assessments. This was evident for 5 (#110, #31, #42, #51, #26) of 40 residents reviewed. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for resident #110 on 1/28/19, revealed an incomplete MDS assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/1/18 failed to assess the resident in Cognition and Mood, Sections C & D. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #31 on 1/28/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 4 residents reviewed for dental status, 2 (#51, #53) of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, 1 (#132) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 (#25) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's pain was managed for 1 ( #131) of 3 residents reviewed for pain. The findings include: A record review for Resident #131, on 1/29/19 at 8:14 AM, revealed a care plan, initiated 1/27/19; for pain related to healing fractures with the goal; Resident #131 will not have an interruption in normal activities due to pain through the review date with the following interventions; Administer analgesia (Tylenol) as per orders, initiate non-pharmacological interventions (like relaxation, guided imagery, music distraction and massage) before, after and if possible, during painful activities or before pain occurs., Orders included to notify physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from residents past experience of pain., PT/OT (physical therapy/occupational therapy) treatment as ordered. Review of medical records, for resident #131, revealed that this resident's medication administration record (MAR) did not have a pain medication order. On 1/30/19 at 1:35 PM, record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0710 — pattern
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff Interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician or nurse practitioner supervised the immediate care and needs for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1 (#29) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Upon entering the facility on 1/24/19 for the recertification survey, review of the facility matrix revealed that Resident # 29 had a facility acquired pressure ulcer, stage 3 (a stage 3 pressure ulcer has full thickness tissue loss; subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed; slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss and may include undermining and tunneling). During record review of Resident # 29's chart on 1/31/19 at 11:06 AM, the progress notes written on 10/8/18, 11/15/18, 11/21/18, 12/5/18, and 12/26/18 failed to reveal that the pressure ulcer was being followed by the physician and/or certified nurse practitioner. On 01/31/19 at 12:06 PM, an interview was conducted with the CRNP (certified register nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-01 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) Review of the medical record for Resident #132 on 1/30/19 revealed a physician's History and Physical note dated 12/3/18. The note was printed on 12/11/18. An 11/16/18 physician's History and Physical note was printed on 11/21/18. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician's progress note dated 12/20/18 was printed on 12/26/18, a 12/25/18 physician's progress note that was printed on 1/23/19 and a 1/2/19 physician's progress note that was printed on 1/23/19. The physician's progress notes were not in the medical record the day of the visit. The medical records clerk stated during an interview on 1/30/19 at 2:43 PM, the physician dictates the note and then it is sent over through a secure email. Every morning when I come in I print the physician's notes and give it to the charge nurse to file. The medical records clerk acknowledged that some of the physician notes took 3 to 4 weeks to arrive at the facility via email. Discussed with the Corporate Nurse on 2/1/19 at 8:36 AM. 3) On 1/25/19, a review of Resident #130's medical record revealed that physician notes were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation on [DATE] at 09:25 AM, it was determined the facility failed to properly store medications as evidenced by 1) failing to label and date medications when opened and 2) failing to discard a medication after the expiration date. This was evident in 4 of 4 medication carts observed. The findings include: 1) Inspection of medication cart on 2nd floor revealed that the facility failed to ensure that the medications were labeled appropriately and not expired. [DATE] 09:25 AM 2nd floor Medication Cart: Resident #4; Humalog Kwik Pen dispensed on [DATE] did not have an open date. Resident #6; Novolog flexpen dispensed on [DATE], did not have an open date. Resident #87; Humalog Qwik pen dispensed on [DATE], did not have an open date. Resident #6; novolog flex pen, dispensed on [DATE], was opened on [DATE] and was expired Resident #92; Levemir flex touch did not have an open date. Resident #83; Novolog injection opened on [DATE], had expired Resident # 99; Lantus injection opened on [DATE] expired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines by 1) failing to label and store resident care equipment in a manner to prevent the development and transmission of disease 2) and failing to ensure that medications were administered in a hygienic manner. This was evident for 1 of 5 observed medication passes during medication administration and 3 of 15 resident room observed on Unit 3. The findings include: 1) During observation of the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER], a bed pan was laying inside of a basin on top of the trash can. 2) Observation conducted in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], on 01/24/19 at 9:42 AM, revealed soiled linen lying on top of the trash can, a bed pan sitting on top of 2 basins, and a toilet hat (to collect urine) sitting on top of the grab rail. 3) Observation conducted in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], on 1/25/19 at 11:42 AM, revealed that a bed pan was sitting inside basins on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observationt it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity by standing to feed a resident and not being at eye level. This was evident for 1 (#89) random observation. The findings include: Observation was made, on 1/25/19 at 9:12 AM, of Geriatric Nursing Assistant #24 standing to feed breakfast to Resident #89. There was a fold up chair next to the bed. According to Resident #89's care plan, the resident was totally dependent on staff for all care needs. The Corporate Nurse was made aware of the observation on 2/1/19 at 8:36 AM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with respect and dignity as evidenced by the failure of staff to knock on resident doors and request permission to enter prior to entry. This was evident for 1 of 5 observed medication passes during medication administration observation. The findings include: Registered Nurse (RN) #17 was observed while performing medication administration for Resident #91 on 1/31/19 at 8:24 AM. During the medication administration, RN #17 entered the room a total of 4 different times. Resident #91 was in the bed closer to the window and Resident #389 was in the bed closer to the door. The first time that RN #17 entered the room (approximately 8:26 AM), s/he walked past the open door and into the room a short way without knocking, then turned around and returned to the door. S/he then knocked loudly on the door and called out, It's time for your medicines. RN #17 then exited the room at 8:27 AM and returned to the room quickly with more supplies. RN #17 did not knock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notification of room/roommate change. This was evident for 1 (#437) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Resident #437's medical record was reviewed on 1/31/19 at 1:45 PM. A progress note, dated 11/4/18 16:00, revealed that the resident was involved in a verbal altercation with his/her roommate. The roommate alleged that the altercation turned physical. A progress note, dated 11/5/18 02:59, indicated that Resident #437's room was changed for arguing with his/her roommate. The record failed to reveal that Resident #437 was provided with written notification of the room change. During an interview on 1/31/19 at 2:15 PM, Staff #1 confirmed that the resident was not provided with a written notification for the room change. Staff #3 was made aware of these findings on 2/1/19 at 8:40 AM. Cross reference F 600.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that facility staff failed to assure that resident medical records remained private and confidential as evidenced by resident information being left visible on the medication administration computer while the nurse entered the resident's room to administer medications. This was evident for 1 of 5 observed medication passes during medication administration observation. The findings include: Staff #17 was observed while performing medication administration for Resident #91 on 1/31/19 at 8:24 AM. When Staff #17 first entered Resident #91's room at 8:26 AM, the surveyor noted that the medication administration computer was left still displaying Resident #91's medical information, including name, date of birth , allergies, diagnoses, prescribed medications, and other information.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident and facility records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a safe resident environment free from abuse by failing to address a resident to resident altercation resulting in a second altercation. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 1/31/19 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed facility incident reports for 2 alleged physical altercations between Resident #25 and #437, who were roommates. The incidents occurred on 10/27/18 and 11/4/18. The report from the incident dated 10/27/18 alleged that Resident #437 struck Resident #25. The report from 11/4/18 alleged that Resident #437 attempted to strike Resident #25 causing Resident #25 to fall from his/her wheelchair. A nursing progress note, dated 11/4/18 16:00, in Resident #437's record indicated Patient had verbal altercation with his/her roommate. Reported by the roommate that the altercation turned physical. The surveyor requested the facility's record of the report to the state agency, investigation follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident and facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately report allegations of abuse to the facility administrator and state agency. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 1/29/19, the surveyor requested and received the facility's incident reports related to 2 alleged physical altercations between Resident's #25 and #437. On 1/31/19 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor requested the facility's documentation that the initial report and investigation follow up report had been sent to the state regulatory agency for each incident. At 12:20 PM on 1/31/19, Staff #1 informed the surveyor that he/she was unable to find that the reports had been sent to the state agency for either incident and stated, I don't know why it wasn't done. Staff #3 was made aware of these findings on 2/1/19 at 8:40 AM. On 2/1/19 at 8:47 AM, Staff #2 informed the surveyor that a nurse reported the incident on 10/27/18 to the supervisor, but the supervisor did not report the incident. Cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident and facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to investigate alleged abuse and prevent further potential abuse by failing to address an alleged resident to resident altercation resulting in a second allegation of assault. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 1/31/19 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed facility incident reports for 2 physical altercations between Resident #25 and #437 who were roommates. The incidents occurred on 10/27/18 and 11/4/18. The report from the incident dated 10/27/18 alleged that Resident #437 struck Resident #25. The report from 11/4/18 alleged that Resident #437 attempted to strike Resident #25 causing Resident #25 to fall from his/her wheelchair. The surveyor requested the facility's investigation documentation for both incidents. At 12:20 PM, Staff #1 informed the surveyor that he/she was unable to find that either incident had been investigated. Staff #1 stated I don't know why it wasn't done. Review of Resident #437's record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 (#51, #132, #130) of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #51's medical record on 1/29/19 revealed the resident had a fall on 7/15/18. Nursing documentation on 7/16/18 revealed, swelling, bruising, painful left hip. The 7/16/18 22:20 nurse's note documented, resident was transported to ER via 911 for left acute femoral fracture. There was no further documentation that the resident was prepared and oriented to the transfer. On 1/29/19 at 1:35 PM, an interview was conducted with the charge nurse, Staff #33. Staff #33 went through the medical record with the surveyor and confirmed there was no documentation that the resident was prepared for transfer to the hospital. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #132 on 1/30/19 revealed a 11/17/18 change in condition nursing note which documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, family and staff interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the appropriate care for activities of daily living to residents who were totally dependent on staff for all aspects of care. This was evident for 1 (#48) of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: On 1/28/19 at 9:16 AM, during an interview, when asked if Resident #48 got the help needed to clean his/her teeth, the resident's representative (RP) stated that they could do better oral care because sometimes when he/she visited, the resident's breath smelled bad. The RP also stated that the resident has had infections of his/her finger nails and toes. On 1/30/19, Resident #48's medical record was reviewed and documented that the resident was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). On 1/30/19 at 3:31 PM, an observation of Resident #48 revealed that the resident's finger nails were long and dirty on both of the resident's hands. On 1/31/19, at 10:23 AM, during an observation of Resident #48,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of residents' medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order for twice-daily blood glucose checks was performed for the first 7 days of the order. This was evident for 1 of 40 residents (Resident #7) reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey. The findings include: Resident #7's medical record was reviewed on 1/28/19 at 11:16 AM. During the review, a note was found written by the resident's primary physician on 1/6/19 that stated, The patient's fingersticks are running significantly elevated. We need to check his/her fingersticks. They are now being checked at this current time at least twice a day. Further review of the medical record did not reveal that the resident was receiving twice-daily fingersticks prior to 1/6/19, however. A physician's order, dated 1/6/19, was also found that ordered twice daily fingersticks to check for blood glucose. In reviewing Resident #7's January treatment administration record (TAR), a treatment was found that stated check finger sticks bid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to arrange follow-up consultation with eye care practitioner to ensure that the resident received proper treatment. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 3 residents reviewed with sensory problems related to vision and/or hearing problems. The findings include: Upon introduction and interview on 1/25/19 at 8:30 AM, resident #38 indicated that he/she was waiting for glasses. At the time, resident #38 was not wearing glasses and indicated that the television was blurry. Review of the resident's medical record on 1/29/19 revealed that resident #38 was seen by an ophthalmologist on 3/21/18. The consultant ophthalmology report indicated issues with the resident's left eye and prescribed medicated drops with follow-up in 6-months. Review of resident #38's care plans revealed developed care plan related to impaired visual function dated 3/13/18. One of the care plan interventions was written as Arrange consultation with eye care practitioner as required. Further review of the medical record did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with urinary incontinence received the appropriate services to achieve or maintain as much normal bladder function as possible. This was evident for 1 (#81) of 1 resident reviewed for bladder incontinence. The findings include: Observation was made of Resident #81, on 1/25/19 at 9:48 AM, lying in bed asleep. There was a urinal sitting on the window sill adjacent to the bottom of the bed. Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed a 12/1/18 quarterly MDS which documented that the resident was frequently incontinent. On 1/31/19 at 2:22 PM, Staff #7 was asked if the resident was able to use the urinal. Staff #7 stated, he has come a long way. We discussed this in care plan meeting. The resident will let you know after he urinates. We have worked hard with him to try to get him to go in the urinal, but it has not been successful. The family wants us to continue to offer him the urinal and we do without success. Review of the ADL (activities of daily living)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility's consultant pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in the physicians orders during the monthly drug regimen review. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 6 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Drugs. The findings include: A review of Resident #25's medical record on 2/1/19 at 11:04 AM revealed physicians orders for pain medications written on 11/13/18. One order was for Percocet 10-325 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. The other order was for Acetaminophen 325 mg administer 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain related to acute paralytic poliomyelitis (an infectious viral disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause temporary or permanent paralysis). The physicians orders were not clear as to how staff would identify if the resident was having pain related to acute paralytic poliomyelitis nor how staff were to determine which of the two pain medications to administer when the resident had pain. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the residents drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 6 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Drugs. The findings include: Resident #25's medical record was reviewed on 2/1/19 at 11:04 AM. The record revealed physicians orders for pain medications written on 11/13/18. One order was for Percocet 10-325 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. The other order was for Acetaminophen 325 mg administer 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain related to acute paralytic poliomyelitis. Poliomyelitis is an infectious viral disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause temporary or permanent paralysis. The physicians orders were not clear as to how staff would identify if the resident was having pain related to acute paralytic poliomyelitis nor how staff were to determine which of the two pain medications should have been administered when the resident had pain. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication by failing to initiate a gradual dose reduction timely when prescribed. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include. Resident # 38's medical record was reviewed throughout the survey. Diagnoses of resident #38 include dementia, with anxiety, mood, and depressive disorder. The resident was prescribed psychotropic medications and received ongoing outside psychiatric health consultations for evaluation of the resident's mood, behavior, and psychotropic medications. The resident had received an on sight psychiatric consultation on 1/2/19. The consultation visit recommended for the resident to have a gradual dose reduction of the anti-psychotic medication Olanzapine. The consultant practitioner recommended to reduce the dosage from 2.5 milligrams (mg) to 1.25 mg daily. A nursing progress note, dated 1/4/19, indicated that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's food service operations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store an ice machine dispensing scoop and failed to utilize appropriate hair restraints for employees preparing meals for residents. This was noted in the facilities kitchen during random observations. The findings include. Initial inspection of the facility's food service operation on 1/24/19 at in the kitchen revealed that the scoop to the ice machine was stored on the ice within the ice machine. The person in charge of the kitchen at the time (staff #35) was notified of the inappropriate storage of the ice scoop. It was noted that there was an ice scoop holding receptacle on the outside of the ice machine. [Appropriate ice and water handling practices prevent contamination and the potential for waterborne illness.] A random inspection of the kitchen on 1/30/19 at 10:38 AM revealed a male dietary person (Staff #11) working with open cans of food preparing individual dishes. Staff #11 was not wearing a beard restraint to cover his facial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain accurate medical records by failing to ensure a resident's smoking assessment was complete and accurate, failing to ensure a medication order was transcribed accurately and failing to ensure an accurate diagnosis list in the resident record. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 (#25) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) 1/30/19 at 1:02 PM, review of Resident #6's most recent assessment, with a reference date of 1/1/19, indicated that Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #6's Smoking Assessment, dated 1/3/19 ,documented that the resident was not cognitively impaired, which was inaccurate, and the smoking assessment was not completed in full as a final decision of either 'safe to smoke without supervision' or 'unsafe to smoke with supervision' had not been completed. 2) On 2/1/19, a review of Resident #25's January 2019 MAR (medication administration record)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-02-01 · tag F0655 — widespread
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the resident/resident representative with a summary of the baseline care plan including the resident's medications and dietary instructions. This was evident for 12 (#53, #127, #132, #297, #130, #294, #7, #59, #78,#387, #388, #74) of 40 residents reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #53 on 1/28/19 revealed that a baseline care plan was created on 9/1/18. According to the unit manager, Staff #7 on 1/28/19 at 3:00 PM, baseline care plans are filled out in the electronic medical record. We only give a copy of the medications if the resident asks for it. We have not been giving a copy of the baseline care plan and a list of medications to the family or resident. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #127 on 1/28/19 revealed that a baseline care plan was developed on 7/30/18, however, was not given to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-02-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 2 (#387, #102, #51, #132, #130) of 9 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) In an interview on 1/24/19 at 9:33 AM, Resident #387 stated that the transfer notice was not given at the time of their transfer to the hospital, or upon their return to facility. Record review did not reveal documentation that Resident #387 was notified, in writing, of the transfer notice. 2) Record review on 1/25/19 at 11:13 AM, of Resident #102, hospitalized on [DATE], did not reveal documentation that the resident or resident representative received a transfer notice. In an interview on 1/25/19 at 11:13 AM, the administrator stated that the facility recently began mailing out the transfer notices, but had not done so previously. 3) Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-02-01 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice of the facility's bed hold policy to residents who were transferred to an acute care facility. This was evident for 4 (Resident #387, #102, #51, #132) of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) In an interview on 1/24/19 at 9:33 AM, resident #387, stated that the bed hold notice was not given at time of transfer to the hospital, or upon return to facility. Record review did not reveal documentation that the resident was notified in writing of the facility's bed hold policy. 2) On 1/25/19 at 11:13 AM, record review of resident #102, hospitalized on [DATE], did not reveal documentation that the resident or resident representative were notified of the facility's bed hold policy. In an interview with the administrator, on 1/25/19 at 11:13 AM, it was stated that the facility recently began mailing out the bed hold and transfer notices, but had not previously done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-04-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.4+1.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE LEONARD J ATTMAN 1995 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 04/14/2014
POWERS, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF12%since 12/01/2025
ALVIN POWERS RESIDUARY TRUST FBO JEFFREY POWERSOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
ALVIN POWERS RESIDUARY TRUST FBO MARK POWERSOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
POWERS, JEFFREYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2005
ATTMAN, LEONARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2005
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2005
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT OF CANTON HARBOR INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2014
EVANS, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2019
ATTMAN, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2025
GILDEN, SHELLYEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2025
LEVITAS, WENDEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2025
CANTON HARBOR RP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2014
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 11%Other / private 89%

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$390per resident / day
operating cost
$11,852per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215176. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next