Future Care Charles Village
2327 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 109 certified beds · (410) 889-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.9% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.6% | 22.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.3% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.1% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.1% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 88.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.4%CMS range 58.2–70.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 9.2–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 88.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 89.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 77.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.2–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 101.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse as evidenced by staff who worked during the time of the alleged incident were not interviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (Resident #8) of 5 investigations reviewed for the allegation of abuse during the compliant survey.The findings include:On 05/18/26 at 12:32 pm the surveyor reviewed the facility's investigation concerning an allegation of abuse concerning Resident #8. The staffing sheets were not included in the investigation; the surveyor asked Administrator #1 to provide the staffing sheets to be reviewed. A review of Unit 3 staffing sheets and staff interviews during the time of the alleged incident revealed there were no interviews/statements from three Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) who worked when the alleged incident occurred. A review of the staffing sheet dated 12/10/25, 3 pm - 11 pm and the staffing sheet dated 12/11/25, 3 pm - 11 pm shift revealed GNA #16 worked on the unit. The staffing sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to accurately document contact attempts for notification of a change in condition with resident representatives. This was evident for 1 of 2 complaints (Resident #3) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Review of intake 2671400 on 5/15/26 at 9:15am revealed an allegation that facility nursing staff failed to notify the resident representative for Resident #3 of a change in condition. Review of Resident #3's medical records on 5/15/26 at 10:11am revealed change in condition documentation that revealed that the resident was observed by nursing staff to have had a change in mental status on 12/13/25. The change in mental status resulted in the resident being transferred to the local hospital for observation and treatment. The medical record documentation also revealed that the resident's son was notified of the change in condition and transfer to the local hospital. Further review of Resident #3's medical records on 5/15/26 at 11:30am revealed that the resident's daughter was listed as the 1st…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations to prevent possible foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment, including but not limited to refrigerators, mobile food carts, tray line equipment, freezers, dishwashers, ovens, stoves, and ranges, must be maintained in safe operating conditions in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations.Cross-contamination means the transfer of harmful substances or disease causing microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils which are not cleaned after touching raw food, and then touch ready-to-eat foods. Cross-contamination can also occur when raw food touches or drips onto cooked ready-to-eat foods. On 9/29/2025 at 7:48 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and facility staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 9 (Resident #1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 11, 29, 58, and #105) out of 9 Resident rooms and the 1st floor shower room on tours of the facility during the annual/recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/30/2025 at 8:30 AM during tour of the facility the surveyor observed items in Resident rooms that were not in good repair. The following rooms were observed with items that were not in good repair: room [ROOM NUMBER] – stained ceiling tile located near window; room [ROOM NUMBER] – stained ceiling tiles located in bathroom and near window; room [ROOM NUMBER] – loose baseboard not affixed to the wall in bathroom under sink; room [ROOM NUMBER] – three ceiling tiles stained with a brown color located near bathroom; room [ROOM NUMBER] – bedside dresser with three broken drawers not affixed on the dresser…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident meals were palatable and hot foods were maintained above the food danger zone of 135 degrees Fahrenheit. This was evident for 6 (Resident #2, 9, 10, 11, 13 and #87) of 6 residents interviewed during the annual survey. This failure had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen. The findings include: 1) On 09/30/25 at 10:04 AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour on the first floor unit and Resident #11 was interviewed. During the interview it was revealed that food was served last of all three units and his/her meals are regularly cold by the time s/he receives it. An interview was held with Resident #9 on 09/30/2025 at 10:55 AM. The resident stated that breakfast is, at most times, cold and would prefer it to be hotter. During a follow up interview with Resident #11 on 10/2/25 at 11:25 AM s/he stated that their meals were now warmer than usual. During a follow up interview on 10/7/25 at 9:25 AM with Resident #9 s/he stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to minimize or eliminate the spread of potential cross-contamination and to implement proper hand hygiene practices to prevent the spread of possible communicable diseases and infections. This was evident in 5 of 5 infection control areas reviewed throughout the facility during the annual survey. The findings include: Hand hygiene refers to a general term that applies to hand washing, antiseptic handwash, and alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). 1) On 9/29/2025 at 8:40 AM, surveyors observed Staff #11 filling residents' water cups from the hand sink faucet in the second-floor nourishment room. The staff member explained that this was a routine practice. On 9/30/2025 at 2:20 PM, the surveyor toured the facility with the Regional Director of Nursing (RDON) and the Director of Nursing/Certified Infection Preventionist (DON/CIP) to address the infection control issues found at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 3 of 3 pieces of equipment reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 9/29/2025 at 7:50 AM, the surveyor observed that the hand sink in the ware washing area was obstructed by an open box of trash bags, with two bags draped over the sink and extending to the kitchen floor.At 7:52 AM, the Champion high-temperature dishwasher was noted to be turned off, and one of the two above-ground grease trap interceptor covers was missing, allowing for visual inspection of the grease level.At 7:54 AM, a review of the high-temperature dishwasher log sheet indicated that the wash and rinse temperatures for breakfast, lunch and dinner have not been documented since 9/24/2025.At 8:30 AM, an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed that the dishwasher had been in use over the weekend, but staff had neglected to log the temperatures. The surveyor requested that the trash bags be removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-07 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clean and effective ventilation systems, thereby impeding proper airflow throughout the premises. This was evident in 3 of 3 areas reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:HVAC means heating, ventilation and air conditioning. Local Exhaust Ventilation ([NAME]) systems are designed/engineered to capture and remove contaminants such as excessive heat, steam, condensation, vapors, smoke, and fumes. This is achieved by calibrating the total pressure, which is determined by the sum of the static pressure exiting and entering the system, minus the velocity pressure entering the system. In addition, the fan speed, pressure, and power must be adjusted to account for the specific gravity of the contaminant being captured and removed by the [NAME] system, considering the specific size and air changes of the room.1) On 9/29/2025 at 1:50 PM, the initial facility tour concluded at the first-floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (#5). This was true for one of residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A record review was completed on 09/29/2025 at 10:54 AM. The review noted that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Sepsis, Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis and Type II Diabetes. Continued review of the record for Resident #5 revealed an MDS assessment dated [DATE]. On section N0350 for Insulin, 1 was indicated for number of days the resident received insulin injections. Next, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, facility staff interview and surveyor record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a Resident's care plan for antipsychotic drug use timely. This finding was found to be evident for 1(Resident #14) out of 1 Resident reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include:In an interview with Resident #14 on 9/30/2025 at 9:20 AM the surveyor asked Resident about care plan meeting. Resident #14 stated I don't attend care plan meeting, and I don't want to attend the meeting. Resident #14 was alert and oriented to person, place and time.A care plan is a formal document or a set of notes that outlines a person's healthcare needs, treatment goals, and the specific interventions required to meet those goals, ensuring personalized and consistent care. It serves as a guide for healthcare providers and Residents, detailing medications, test results, and care strategies while promoting collaboration between the Resident, their family, and the care team.Antipsychotic drug is a class of medication used to treat mental health conditions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs and preferences of residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13 and #119) of 2 residents interviewed for activities during the annual survey.The findings include:On 9/29/2025 at 2:30 PM, the surveyor observed 14 residents on the first-floor dining/activities room and noted that eight residents were sitting in their wheelchairs, and six residents were sitting in the Geri chairs, where two residents have fully extended their recliner seats positioned to elevate their legs. When the surveyor asked to speak with resident #13, five other residents had to rearrange their chairs out of the dining/activities room to allow the resident to exit from the corner of the limited spaced dining/activities room.On 10/2/2025 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor observed five residents on the second-floor dining/activities room and noted that three residents were sitting in front of the large screen TV while two other residents were staring out the windows.On 10/3/2025 at 2:15 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interviews with residents, residents' family members and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure ordered splints were in place, 2) failed to get an X-ray and the appropriate higher level of care for a resident who had sustained a fall that had resulted in a hip fracture in a timely manner, 3) failed to get a resident who was experiencing abdominal pain and had made multiple request for the facility to call 911 transported to the hospital in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and #15) of 2 residents reviewed for neglect during the annual survey.The findings include:1) Surveyor completed a tour of the facility and multiple observations of Resident #2 on 9/2/2025. During these observations Resident #2 was observed lying in his/her bed without any noticeable splints or braces in place. Upon review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), it was discovered that the nurse had signed off that the splints had been applied but failed to do so. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified.2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, facility staff interview, and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate respiratory care and services. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #30) out of 2 Residents reviewed for respiratory care and services.The findings include:On tour of Unit 3 on 9/29/2025 at 2:35 PM the surveyor observed Resident #30 in bed with an oxygen concentrator in the room in use. There was not an oxygen signage posted on Resident #30's room door upon entry to the room.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #30's medical record on 10/2/2025 at 7:45 AM. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #30 had a current physician order dated 6/3/2025 for oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters/minute every shift for shortness of breath.Additionally, the surveyor reviewed the nursing home facility's Respiratory Therapy: Oxygen Therapy Policy and Procedure on 10/2/2025 at 8:15 AM. The policy indicated that oxygen will be delivered in a safe manner.In an interview with the Unit Manager on Unit 3 at 11:10 AM on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient physician-ordered thickened drinks to maintain resident hydration needs and preferences. This deficiency was evident for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 resident reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 9/29/2025 at 2:30 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in the dining/activities room without a hydration cup at the table. The surveyor requested to escort the resident back to their room for a private conversation, whereupon the resident requested a cup of water.On 9/30/2025 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 with a therapist; however, no hydration cup was present next to the bedside tray table or dresser drawer.On 10/2/2025 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 with a therapist; however, no hydration cup was present next to the bedside tray table or dresser drawer.On 10/3/2025, at 12:49 PM, a record review indicated that the resident was on a regular diet, level 7, and level 2 mildly thick consistency liquid, with no straws and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Treatment Administration Record was documented in accordance with physician's orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #114) of 1 resident's records reviewed during the survey.The findings include:On 10/3/2025 at 3:05 PM, a record review indicated that Resident #114 had a physician's order for a topical ointment to be applied to the right hip four times a day for pain. A record review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that Staff #8, Staff #29, and Staff #30 made 11 consecutive entries over a three-day period, from 3/6/2025, to 3/8/2025, indicated that the topical ointment was applied to the resident's both hips.On 10/6/2025 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor requested the Regional Clinical Services Nurse to verify the inconsistency noted in the resident's MAR and TAR report.On 10/7/2025 at 9:00 AM, the Administrator and the Regional Clinical Services Nurse confirmed that all three staff have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a call bell system accessible to residents in the restrooms. This was evident for 3 of 3 restroom call bell systems reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 9/29/2025 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed that the restroom call bell cords in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were wrapped around the toilet handrails making them inaccessible to residents if they were on the restroom floors.On 10/3/2025 at 1:40 PM, the Regional Director of Operations was informed of these findings and confirmed that the call bell cord would be extended to the restroom floors to ensure resident accessibility.On 10/6/2025 at 12:05 PM, the surveyor noted an additional restroom call bell cord in room [ROOM NUMBER] wrapped around the toilet handrail making it inaccessible to residents if they were on the restroom floor.The Administrator, Regional Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Clinical Services Nurse, and the DON were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) consistently document whether a resident was having psychotropic medication side effects or behaviors. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (Resident #32) of 3 Behavioral Records reviewed during the survey; and 2) document in the progress notes, the consent of the resident or the resident representation prior to the installation of the side rails. This was evident for 3 out of 3 residents, (#2, #28, and #80) reviewed for siderail consent. The findings include: 1) On 01/12/24 on 12:15 pm Review of Resident #32's Behavioral Record for November 2023 there was no documentation on the behavioral record on 11/18/23 and 11/19/23 during day shift for signs and symptoms of depression, inappropriate behaviors towards female staff, or psychotropic medication side effects. In December 2023 there is no documentation on 12/04/23, 12/09/23, and 12/14/23 for behavioral monitoring for signs and symptoms of depression, inappropriate behaviors towards female staff, or psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and observations, it was determined the facility staff failed to: 1) provide a resident with a locked cabinet to secure valuables, and 2) maintain residents' shower rooms to be operational, usable, and in good repair. This was evident in 1(#59) of 1 resident records reviewed for accommodation of needs during the survey and 6 out of 9 resident shower stalls observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 01/10/24 at 10:05 am during an interview with Resident #59, he/she reported having money taken from his/her drawer a month prior and requested to have a lock on the bedside table. The surveyor checked the bedside table, and a lock was not in place. On 01/18/24 at 2:16 pm, the Administrator reported a Concern Form was completed in November 2023 and they spoke with the resident. He/she indicated she misplaced the money and didn't believe it was taken. A lock box with a key will be provided. Review of the Concern Form dated 11/01/23 revealed that maintenance would apply a lock to her stand/closet. On 01/23/24 at 10:52 am during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) An observation was made on 1/18/24 at 11:00 AM of a resident room during an interview with the resident to discuss concerns. Resident #141 stated that a mouse was seen in the room and that the mouse retreated in a hole that is in the wall behind the toilet. At that time an observation was made of the bathroom and there was a hole in the wall next to the toilet and above the base board. It was approximately the size of 3 silver dollars. Review of the maintenance logs that were provided to the survey team indicated that the building was treated on 1/5/24 by a pest control company for mouse complaints on the first floor. An interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director on 1/18/24 at 3:40 PM and he was made aware of the resident concern regarding the mice and the observation of the hole in the resident bathroom and he stated that he would repair the hole. The Maintenance Director returned to the survey team on 1/19/24 and reported that the hole in the resident room was repaired. He also stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was evident in 1 (#241) of 4 facility reported incidents investigated during the survey. The findings include: On 01/24/24 at 2:50 pm a review of the facility's investigation of MD00184620 revealed that on 10/11/22 while providing personal care to Resident # 241 the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #49 yelled at and spoke to Resident #241 in a demeaning manner according to the resident's roommate. On 01/24/24 at 3:24 pm further review of the investigation revealed Resident # 241's roommate reported the GNA #49 was verbally abusive to the resident. The alleged GNA was interviewed. A complaint was filed with the Maryland Board of Nursing (MBON) on 10/18/22. Review of the five-day follow-up report submitted by the facility indicated the allegation of abuse was not substantiated. On 01/26/24 at 12:38 pm the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing why abuse was not substantiated when GNA #49 was terminated on 10/18/22 and reported to the MBON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency within the two hour timeframe. This was found to be evident for 4 of 22 facility reported abuse investigations reviewed during the facility's survey. Findings include: 1) While the survey team was conducting the survey, the facility administration team was informed on 1/17/24 at 2:19 PM of an allegation of abuse by residents regarding a staff member. The facility stated to the survey team that they would investigate. A meeting was conducted with the Administration team on 1/22/24 at 10:30 AM and they gave an update to the survey team. The Administrator was asked if the facility sent an initial report to the state agency and he stated that after conducting their investigation, abuse was unsubstantiated and that it was a customer service concern provided education to the staff. The Administrator returned to the survey team on 1/23/24 and stated that he submitted a late initial report to the state agency and will follow-up by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to send a copy of a resident's transfer to the hospital to the Ombudsman. This deficient practice was evident in 1 (#20) of 2 resident records reviewed for transfer/discharge paperwork during the survey. The findings include: On 01/10/24 at 11:34 am, a review of Resident #20's electronic medical record revealed the resident was transferred to the emergency department on 10/20/23. On 01/23/24 at 3:04 pm the surveyor requested a copy of the resident's transfer notice sent to the responsible party and verification a copy was sent to the ombudsman. On 01/24/24 at 9:32 am the surveyor received a copy of the October 2023 admission/discharge list that was emailed to the ombudsman on 11/01/23 at 7:12 am. Resident #20 was not included on the list. On 01/24/24 at 10:41 am during an interview with Regional Nursing Director #3 who verbalized the staff did not do the quick editing and when the Administrator pulled the report, Resident #20 was not on the list which was realized on 1/23/24.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) initiate a patient centered care plan for a resident who was ordered oxygen therapy, 2) initiate a care plan for a resident who had a significant weight loss, and 3) establish a care plan specific to one of the resident's primary diagnosis. This deficient practice was evident in 3 (#20, #32, #12) out of 6 resident records reviewed for the initiation of care plans for residents. The findings include: 1) On 01/17/24 A review of Resident #20's electronic medical record revealed the resident had an order for oxygen therapy. Further review of the EMR revealed the resident did not have a patient specific care plan for oxygen therapy. On 01/17/24 at 12:38 PM during an interview with Director of Nursing #1, If a resident has a diagnosis indicating the need oxygen he/she would put the care plan under respiratory or cardiac depending on the resident's needs. DON #1 confirmed Resident #20 did not have a patient specific care plan for oxygen therapy. 2) On 01/17/24 at 11:30 am a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) update a resident care plan to address the resident specific needs (Resident #63), 2) have quarterly care plan meetings including the dietician for a resident who had a significant weight loss (Resident #89), 3) initiate a diagnosis specific care plan for a resident during the resident's length of stay (Resident #12). This was found to be evident for 3 of 62 residents, reviewed for care plan timing. Findings include: 1) During an observation made on 1/10/24 at 12:10 PM, Resident #63 was observed lying in the bed and the resident was noted to have lesions present to the right neck area near the ear and left ear area. The area had redness with a small amount of heme (blood) present. A staff nurse who was present at the nurse station was made aware of the observation and she stated that she would assess the resident. Resident #63's medical record was reviewed on 1/23/24 at 11:30 AM and upon review it revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a summary of a resident's stay and a copy of the most recent comprehensive assessment to a resident who initiated a discharge. This deficient practice was evident in 1 (#241) of 1 resident-initiated discharge record reviewed. The findings include: On 01/25/24 at 10:14 am a review of Resident #241's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was discharged on 07/01/23. On 01/25/24 at 11:01 am during an interview with Director of Social Services #5 revealed the resident initiated the discharge so arrangements were made after gathering information with the resident for needs at home and process is to provide discharge instructions, prescriptions and a medication list. On 01/25/24 at 11:05 am the surveyor requested to view Resident #241's discharge instructions, post discharge plan of care, and all the documents provided to Resident #241 when discharged . On 01/25/24 at 11:40 am the surveyor reviewed Resident #241's post discharge plan of care, 17 prescriptions, and a note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) such as bathing and/or showering were provided these services. This was found to be true for 3 of 3 residents (#32, #38, and #82) reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: 1. On 1/22/24 at 10:12 AM the surveyor toured three clinical units in the facility. The surveyor was informed by the administrator that there were three single occupancy resident rooms with private showers. The surveyor observed that the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a shower curtain and there was storage of a wheelchair, and walker inside the shower stall. Resident #82 was present in his/her bed watching the TV, dressed in civilian clothes. At approximately 10:15 AM on 1/23/24 the surveyor interviewed Resident #82 who stated that he/she had not been provided a shower since his admission, but the staff had assisted him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to prevent new pressure ulcers/in-house acquired wounds from occurring. This was evident for 2 (Resident #242 and #92) out of 3 residents reviewed for new pressure ulcers during the survey. The findings include: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved prolonged pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and /or eschar in the wound bed). 1). Record review, on 01/25/24 at 11:50 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure annual staff performance reviews were completed as required, 2) ensure an annual performance review for the facility Geriatric Nurse Aides (GNAs), 3) provide performance related outcomes based staff education. This was found to be evident for 1 of 7 clinical employee files reviewed and for 1 of 5 GNA's that were reviewed during the survey. Findings include: On 1/26/24 at 2:00 PM two employee files were reviewed after Resident #143 reported allegations of abuse to the facility staff on 1/24/24. Upon review of the employee file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #43 who was hired in 2021 did not contain documentation of a performance evaluation. Further review of LPN #43's file revealed a documented disciplinary notice dated 11/15/22 with an (x) documented next to written warning, for not following proper infection control procedures. On 1/4/23 LPN # 43 did not complete schedule evaluations for a shift and on 1/5/23 she did not complete lab report documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of facility documentation the facility failed to properly store medications and biologicals under proper temperature controls according to professional standards. This was evident in 1 out of 3 medication storage refrigerators observed during the survey. The findings include: During observation rounds of the facility 2nd floor medication storage room on 01/12/24 at 11:37 AM with Staff (#3) the refrigerator storing medications and biologicals thermometer read 58 degrees F. Several medications and biologicals for facility residents were found in this refrigerator. During an interview on 01/12/24 at 11:50 AM Staff (#3) stated that yes, the refrigerator was too hot and confirmed that the refrigerator thermometer read 58 degrees F. Staff (#3) stated that he/she will get someone to come now to fix it. Review of facility policy for Medication Storage on 01/12/24 at 3:30 PM revealed that medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F are to be kept in a secure refrigerator with a thermometer to allow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a resident's food intolerance list and to honor requested double-portion meals. This was evident for 1 (Resident #391) out of 9 residents reviewed for food preference and nutritional adequacy. The findings include: On 1/9/23 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #391 who stated I could not do too much .too weak and needed to re-strengthen. I was hungry and told the staff that I need .more food on my tray, like a doubled portion. This resident was observed in bed with a 30 degrees up sitting position. Visibly excessive nasal and neck muscles were being used to gain air intake from his/her oxygen supply. During record review on 1/11/24 at 13:19 PM, it was revealed that Resident #391 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an intensive care hospitalization. The resident had a history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview regarding the facility kitchen's operation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service to prevent the potential for contamination. This was evident for 2 out of 3 observations in the kitchen. The findings include: On 1/9/24 at 10:31 AM, a tour was conducted in the kitchen with Regional Kitchen Director Staff #13. The surveyor observed and pointed out that there was a bucket sitting on the floor with labeled food items and dates. Further observation, on 1/22/24 at 10:00 AM, revealed that a stack of fresh bread in eight large trays was sitting on the kitchen floor in the middle of a high foot traffic area. The last tray was only less than one inch from touching the floor. During interview, Kitchen Director Staff #39 stated that she was about to move the bread.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices as evidenced by a resident's oxygen tubing being uncovered and draped over the oxygen concentrator and five used, unlabeled, and undated urinals being left in the bathroom cabinet. The deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident #20 and the residents who reside in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The findings include: During observation rounds on Unit 1 on 01/09/24 at 9:32 am, while in Resident #20's room the surveyor observed the resident's oxygen tubing draped over the oxygen concentrator. Under further inspection the surveyor noted the oxygen tubing was not labeled or dated. The sterile water connected to the oxygen concentrator was not labeled or dated. Geriatric Nursing Assistance (GNA) #7 was in the resident's room and confirmed the surveyor's findings. On 01/10/24 at 2:05 pm while in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, the surveyor observed five used urinals under the bathroom sink. GNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control as flying gnats were observed throughout the building. This was found to be evident during the survey. Findings include: During the survey multiple observations were made of gnat sightings throughout the building. On the first day of the survey on January 9, 2024, surveyors were placed in one of the facility's rooms and with multiple flying gnats observed in the room. During a resident council meeting conducted on 1/11/24 at 10:00 AM in the dining room on the second floor, the residents that were in attendance were swatting at the gnats throughout the meeting. The residents stated that at one time, the problem with the gnats were brought under control, but currently, it has been an ongoing problem. A meeting was conducted with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) Staff # 5 and the DON on 1/11/24 at approximately 10:38 AM after the resident council meeting, to make the facility aware of the resident's concerns. They told the survey team that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident, or the resident's representative, was notified in writing regarding the reason for a hospital transfer. This was found to be evident for two out of four residents (Resident #85 and #52) reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/14/19 review of Resident #85's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnosis included severe dementia. The resident had a hospital transfer in December 2018. On 2/14/19 at 2:14 PM the Unit Nurse Manager #13 reported that a Notice of Facility Initiated Transfer form is sent with the resident to the hospital, a copy is kept on the chart and one is mailed to the responsible party. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that the resident or the responsible party had received a Notice of Facility Initiated Transfer. On 2/14/19 at 2:19 PM this information was reviewed with the Unit Nurse Manager. On 2/14/19 at 2:42 PM the corporate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident, or the resident's representative, was notified in writing of the bed-hold policy at the time of a hospital transfer. This was found to be evident for two out of four residents (Resident #85 and #52) reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/14/19 review of Resident #85's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnosis included severe dementia. The resident had a hospital transfer in December 2018. On 2/14/19 at 2:14 PM the Unit Nurse Manager #13 reported that the bed-hold policy is sent with the resident to the hospital, a copy is kept on the chart and one is mailed to the responsible party. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that the resident or the responsible party had received a copy of the bed-hold policy at the time of the December 2018 transfer. On 2/14/19 at 2:19 PM this information was reviewed with the Unit Nurse Manager. On 2/14/19 at 2:42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans as evidenced by 1) failure to develop a care plan to address a resident diagnosis and 2) failure to develop a care plan to address the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. This was found to be evident for two out of twenty-four residents (Resident #78 and #398) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 2/13/19 Resident #78's medical records were reviewed and revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility in December 2018 for long term care and with diagnosis which included breast cancer. Further review of the medical records revealed that the resident had monthly follow-up related to the diagnosis and was currently receiving chemotherapy. Review of the care plans failed to reveal a care plan for cancer. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical records review and interview with staff it was determined that the staff failed to 1) revise care plans with appropriate goals and interventions and 2) review and revise the care plan for a resident after a significant change. This was found to be evident for two of twenty-nine residents (Resident #78 and #397) reviewed for care plan timing and revisions during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is valuable in preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels. It must reflect immediate steps for assuring outcomes which improve the resident's status and progress. 1) Review of Resident #78's medical record on 2/13/19 revealed the resident's diagnoses which included cancer and a remote history of substance abuse. Review of the resident medical records also revealed that the resident developed a wound secondary to her/his medical diagnosis. Further review of the medical records revealed weekly visits by the wound team. Review of the impaired skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow their policy for proper notification of a physician when Resident #62 left the facility. This was evident for one out of one residents (Resident #62) reviewed during closed record reviews. Findings include: A medical record review conducted on 02/14/19 at 10:03 AM for Resident #62 revealed Resident had signed out Against Medical Advice (AMA) on 1/30/19 and left the facility. Review of the facility's policy regarding Residents signing out AMA conducted on 02/15/19 at 08:57 AM revealed the Administrator and attending physician must be notified immediately of the AMA discharge. Review of medical record at this time failed to provide documentation of either the Administrator or physician being notified on 1/30/19. These concerns were discussed during an interview with the Corporate Manager on 2/15/19 at 11:00 AM who confirmed that no documentation was found verifying that the Administrator and physician had been notified when Resident #62 signed out AMA on 1/30/19.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) have an effective system in place to ensure that the hand off communication regarding resident consultations and prescriptions were clearly and effectively communicated with staff and 2) make a referral to hospice in a timely manner. This was evident for two of twenty-nine residents (Resident #78 and #93) reviewed during the investigation process of the long-term care process. The findings include: 1) On 2/15/19 Resident #78's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2016 for long term care and with diagnoses which included cancer, Lymphedema (swelling that generally occurs in one of your arms or legs and is most commonly caused by the removal of or damage to your lymph nodes as a part of cancer treatment). Medical record review also revealed that the resident had monthly visits with the Oncologist. Further review of the medical records revealed that on 1/4/19 the resident returned from the oncologist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly assess and implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #398. This was evident for one out of five Residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A medical record review conducted on 02/12/19 at 02:40 PM revealed documentation that on 2/8/19 Resident #398 had developed a new Stage II sacral pressure ulcer. Further record review at that time revealed this resident had diagnoses of but not limited to a left leg above the knee amputation, iron deficiency anemia and generalized weakness. Although there were several documented occasions that the Resident was refusing care, i.e. physical therapy and showers, the facility failed to implement strategies to encourage him/her to do so. A resident interview was conducted on 02/14/19 at 01:13 PM. The surveyor asked Resident #398 how often someone helps him/her change positions and/or get out of the bed. The resident stated only when h/she asks or when they bring the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident #397 with the necessary behavioral health care in the expected time frame. This was evident for one out of two residents (Resident #397) noted to be receiving behavioral health services. Findings include: Record review on 02/12/19 on 03:00 PM for Resident #397 revealed an eInteract change of condition note written on 1/31/19 that stated the Resident was depressed and a possible suicide potential. Further record review revealed that on 1/31/19 the Social Worker (SW) #25 met with Resident #397 and determined h/she was not a suicide risk, however h/she was depressed and did not desire to live anymore. At that time the SW called the physician who wrote an order for a psychology consult. During an interview with SW #25 conducted on 02/15/19 at 11:35 AM she revealed per her evaluation on 1/31/19 of Resident #397 that the Resident was sad and depressed over his/her current medical conditions and wanted to die but did not have a plan to hurt his/herself. An interview with the Corporate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain records that were legible. This was evident during the review of two of two medical records (Resident #38 and #93) reviewed during the annual review. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 regarding unnecessary medications on 02/14/19 at 10:56 AM revealed physician notes from 1/29/18 thru 1/27/18 that were not legible to the surveyor. The Corporate Nurse and Unit Manager and Director of Nursing (DON) were subsequently called in and asked to read the physician notes from the Physician in the presence of the survey team. They were unable to decipher the entirety of the physician notes from 1/29/18 thru 1/27/19. 2. During the review of the medical record for Resident #93 on 2/15/19 at 8:31 AM surveyor attempted to review the physician documentation related to the resident's assessment. Again, the surveyor was unable to decipher the physician's documentation and showed the physician notes to the Corporate Nurse on 2/15/19 at 2:49 PM who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date leftover food that was in the refrigerator. This was true of on out three observations made in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator. Findings include: On the initial kitchen observation tour on 2-11-2019 at 10:00 AM with Food Service Manager (Staff #11), a large package of aluminum foil was observed on the second shelf in the walk-in refrigerator. The package was not labeled or dated. Interview with the Staff #11 revealed it was determined to be left over ham that was being used to make ham sandwiches as an alternate meal for the residents. The Food Service Manager (Staff #11) was aware of the unlabeled package at the time of the tour. The administrator was also made aware on 2-19-2019 at 4:05 PM.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTMAN, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| ATTMAN, LEONARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2003 |
| FINGLASS, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| SPADARO, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/29/2005 |
| ATTMAN, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/29/2025 |
| GILDEN, SHELLYE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/29/2025 |
| LEVITAS, WENDE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/29/2025 |
| 2327 NORTH CHARLES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/30/2025 |
| ALVIN POWER FAMILY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| POWERS, JEFFREY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
| POWERS, MARK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.