No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Future Care Homewood

2700 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 · For profit - Individual · 141 certified beds · (410) 554-6300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 554-6300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Jun 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2510 Saint Paul St Floor 1 · (833) 243-7411 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2504 N Charles St · (410) 662-7594 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.3 mi
2401 N Charles St · (410) 261-6110 · Call to confirm hours
Park
North Charles Street &, W 29th St · (410) 338-3705 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.0%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.3%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.1%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.0%96.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.3%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.521.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 276 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.8%CMS range 47.0–64.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 10.2–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.1–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.03
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
46.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 139.1 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.38 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.52 to 1.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-30)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were served to residents at an appealing and palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 test tray temperature observation. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared by the facility.The findings include:Resident interviews revealed ongoing concerns regarding the quality, taste temperature, variety, and portions of meals served by the facility.On 6/23/2026 at 8:54 AM, Resident #104 stated that the food tasted awful, lacked variety, and was served cold.On 6/23/2026 at 9:14 AM, Resident #8 stated that food did not taste good.On 6/23/2026 at 9:27 AM, Resident #14 stated that the food was room temperature.On 6/23/2026 at 9:32 AM, Resident #39 stated that meals lacked variety and were usually cold.On 6/23/2026 at 9:43 AM, Resident #138 complained that meal portions were inadequate.On 6/23/2026 at 10:33 AM, Resident #38 stated that the food was rarely served hot.On 6/24/2026 at 7:53 AM, Resident #17 stated that the food tasted terrible.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and stored to maintain their integrity and prevent the use of outdated food. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen, and this finding had the potential to affect all residents who received food prepared by the facility. The findings include: On, 6/23/2026 at 7:53 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (Staff #8), the surveyor observed more than 20 plastic souffle cups containing salad dressing labeled with a preparation date of 6/9/2026. The surveyor also observed a clear container of leftover egg salad covered with a plastic wrap and labeled 6/13/2026. During the same tour, the surveyor observed two dry storage bins containing flour and sugar that were not labeled. On 6/26/2026 at 7:56 AM, Dietary Aide (Staff #22) stated that leftover food items should be labeled, refrigerated, and discarded after 3 days. On 6/26/2026 at 8:33 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the findings. On 6/29/2026 at 1:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and maintain residents' dignity by serving meals on paper trays with disposable plastic utensils for an extended period without a documented clinical or regulatory justification. This was evident for 2 (Residents #39 and #9) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: Contact Precautions and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are both infection-control strategies used to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). The key difference is that EBP targets high- risk residents without isolating them, while Contact Precautions require strict room isolation for contagious infections. On 6/23/2026 at 9:32 AM, Resident #39 stated during an interview that meals were routinely served on paper trays with plastic utensils. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the practice. On 6/23/2026 at 9:59 AM, Resident #9 was also expressed concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to protect the privacy of a resident's clinical information. This was evident for 1 (Resident #86) out of 45 residents that were in the survey sample.The findings include:During an environmental tour of the facility on 6/29/26 at 8:37 AM an unlocked medication cart with an open laptop was observed outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Closer inspection revealed that Resident #86's medications and some personal information were onscreen and visible. This surveyor then stood two feet away from the medication cart to continue the observation.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 came out of the room at 8:38 AM, went to the cart and opened the controlled substance logbook. He searched through the logbook and called back to the resident to let the resident know he was searching for information regarding whether the resident was administered a particular medication or not. LPN #5 came out of the room again, went to the cart, looked at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's psychotropic drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to timely act upon a pharmacist's recommendation to evaluate, add a duration, or implement a stop date for an active as needed (PRN) anxiolytic medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #18) of 5 Resident records reviewed for unnecessary medication during the recertification survey process.The Findings Included:A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: (i) Anti-psychotic; (ii) Anti-depressant; (iii) Anti-anxiety; and (iv) Hypnotic.On 06/25/2026 at 10:15 AM, a review of the Resident#18's clinical records revealed that on 04/08/2026 a monthly pharmacy review of the resident's medication was conducted and the Pharmacist's recommendation showed that: Resident #18 had an order of hydroxyzine 50mg PO Q12 hours PRN anxiety. Re-evaluate the continued use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurate. This was evident for 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #17) out of 30 residents reviewed for MDS assessment during the annual survey. The findings include:A colostomy is a surgical procedure which involves creating a hole in the abdominal wall called a stoma, through which a portion of the colon is brought to the surface and attached to a pouch outside the body to collect stool (colostomy bag). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned for based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed ensure physician orders were obtained and implemented in accordance with their assessed needs and individualized care plans by: 1) failing to obtain and implement physician orders for turning and repositioning dependent residents; and 2) failing to obtain a physician order that included the clinical indication for a resident's chronic urinary catheter. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1 and #6) of 3 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility, and for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter management during the annual and complaint survey.The findings include:1a) According to the Mayo Clinic, a contracture is a condition where muscles, tendons ligaments, or skin tighten, restricting the normal movement of the affected body part. This can lead to a joint being stuck in a bent or flexed position.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment is a standardized tool used to evaluate the residents' functional, physical, and psychosocial status and to guide individualized care planning.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review ad interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received treatment in accordance with the wound physician's recommendations to promote healing. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer during the recertification and complaint survey.The findings include:A pressure ulcer, also known as a bedsore or pressure sore, is an open wound that occurs when skin is damaged by prolonged pressure. Pressure ulcers can range in severity from discoloration to open sores that expose bone or muscle. They can be painful and take a long time to heal. Pressure ulcers often develop on bony areas of the body, such as the heels, ankles, buttocks, hips, tailbone, and back. They can occur in people who are bedridden or use a wheelchair and are more likely to develop in areas where the body rests against the chair or bed. On 6/29/2026 at 8:04 AM, a review of Resident #1's medical record revealed that the resident was evaluated by the wound physician on 6/22/2026 for a Stage 4 pressure ulcer of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to 1) ensure that oxygen was administered as ordered, and 2) ensure residents' oxygen tubing was labelled and placed in the resident's nose as ordered. This was evident for 2 (Resident #17 and Resident #98) out of 3 residents sampled for oxygen use during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/23/2026 at 7:55 AM, during the initial screening process of the survey, Resident #17 was observed in bed receiving supplemental oxygen through a nasal cannula. The concentrator flow meter was set at 2.5 Liters per minute (L/min). The resident was unsure whether the oxygen flow should have been 2 L/min or 3 L/min. On 6/25/2026 at 10:40 AM, a review of Resident #17's electronic record revealed an active order dated 5/26/2026 for Oxygen via Nasal Cannula at 3 LPM every shift for COPD. An additional observation on 6/25/2026 at 11:03 AM, revealed that Resident #17's oxygen flow meter remained at 2.5 L/min. Staff #5 was present in the resident's room and verified the finding. On 6/25/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to document attempts at non-pharmacological interventions prior to a resident being administered a pain medication. This was evident for 3 (Resident #124, Resident #18, and Resident #10) out of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Non-pharmacological interventions are identified as an alternative method of treatment for a medical concern without the use of medication. This could include physical, psychological, and lifestyle interventions designed to reduce pain and improve quality of life. The CDC's 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids emphasizes non-pharmacological, non-opioid therapies as the first line of treatment for subacute and chronic pain. 1) On 6/25/2026 at 8:58AM, during a review of pain medications for Resident #124, the surveyor noted an order dated 6/16/2026 as follows: Acetaminophen (Tylenol) tablets 325 mg, give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain 1-5 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to lock a medication cart. This was evident for 1 (Resident #86) out of 45 residents that were in the survey sample.The findings include:During an environmental tour of the facility on 6/29/26 at 8:37 AM an unlocked medication cart with an open laptop was observed outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Closer inspection revealed that Resident #86's medications and some personal information were onscreen and visible. This surveyor then stood two feet away from the medication cart to continue the observation.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 came out of the room at 8:38 AM, went to the cart and opened the controlled substance logbook. He searched for information regarding whether the resident was administered a particular medication or not. LPN #5 came out of the room again, went to the cart, looked at the computer screen, closed the window on the computer screen, and then locked the cart. Another nurse approached the cart; LPN #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside resource routine dental service to meet the needs of each resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services during the recertification survey process.The Findings Included:On 06/24/2026 at 11:20 AM, during Resident #19's interview the resident revealed that he/she would like to see a dentist because his/her dentures were not fitting well. The surveyor observed that the resident had no teeth in his/her mouth.On 06/26/2026 at 9:31 AM, a review of the Resident #19's medical record revealed that oral screenings where conducted on 4 separate occasions (7/18/2025, 10/18/2025, 1/18/2026 and 4/18/2026) and each dental screen revealed that the oral assessment identified the resident's mouth condition as edentulous and dental consult needed; however, there was no documented evidence to support that dental consult was obtained at anytime since the resident's admission in April 2025.On 06/26/2026 at 11:55 AM, in an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's showers were documented accurately. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) out of 1 reviewed for showers during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the initial tour of the facility Resident #8 was interviewed on 6/23/26 at 9:09 AM. This surveyor asked if the resident receives two showers each week. The resident replied that they would like to get showers but has not received one. Resident said they only get bed baths because staff would not take them to the showers. A review of the resident's annual minimum data set (MDS) on 6/25/26 at 8:12 AM under Section F the resident replied that it was Very Important for them to choose whether they received a shower or a bath. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed that under the Documentation Survey Reports for April, May, and June 2026 the resident did not receive a shower but only bed baths. This surveyor interviewed the Fourth Floor Unit Manager (Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions. This was the result of a random observation during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During a tour of the facility on 6/25/26 at 9:15 AM Staff #11 and Staff #12 were observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER]. The door had a sign alerting anyone entering the room that there were enhanced barrier precautions in place.Enhanced barrier precautions required using hand sanitizer prior to entering the room and prior to exiting the room. The precaution also required using gloves, gown, and mask prior to contact with the resident as well as contact with the resident's linen.The two staff entered without using hand sanitizer prior to entry. The two were observed to have touched the bed several times, they touched the sheets, the air mattress and the air mattress device which maintained the air content. The two left the room after approximately two minutes. While they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for two (2) out of 21 sampled residents (Resident [R] #6 and R#19) when housekeeping staff failed to clean the residents' room and bathroom which had a strong smell of urine; and general housekeeping duties were not completed across three (3) units (Units #4, #5, and #6). Intakes #2608459 and #2599200 are directly related to these findings.The findings include:Review conducted on 5/13/26 at 2:00 PM of the facility's 1.2 Environmental Hygiene Cleaning & Disinfection Program dated July 2020 noted: Cleaning is the physical removal of dirt, body fluids, and other organic matter. Disinfection destroys the number of potential pathogens on a surface.4.1 General Cleaning and Disinfection Procedures for Daily Room and Discharge Cleaning.General Guideline - 1. Housekeeping surfaces (e.g., floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur and when these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for residents. This was evident for 2 resident (Resident #137 and Resident #410) of 3 residents who were reviewed for pain management during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During a complaint investigation on 5/12/2025, at 5:58 PM, it was revealed that in February 2025, a complainant reported Resident #410 was in constant pain from wounds and often received medication late. On 5/13/2025, at 9:50 AM, Registered Nurse (RN #13) explained that nurses documented medication administration time when they physically handed medications to residents. The final documented time was entered after leaving the resident's room and saving the record. RN #13 stated, it should have a couple minutes gap, but not hours gap. Additionally, RN #13 explained that wound nurses communicated wound care schedules to floor nurses, enabling them to administer pain medication prior to treatment. When interviewed on 5/13/2025, at 10:48 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of staff personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure nursing staff are retrained on an annual basis. This was evident for 3 (Staff #6, #34, #37) out of the 5 nurses reviewed for skills and competencies. The findings include: A review of the employee files for Staff #6, Staff #34 and Staff #37 revealed trainings for: Abuse and Neglect, Active Shooter Response, Age-Specific Care, Employee Safety Basics, Fire Safety, Infection Control and Prevention Basics, Person-centered Care, Normal Aging Process, and Understanding Dementia were past due. Staff #6's trainings were due by these dates as follows: Abuse and Neglect - 2/28/25, Active Shooter Response - 4/30/25, Age-Specific Care - 2/28/25, Employee Safety Basics - 4/30/25, Fire Safety - 3/31/25, Infection Control and Prevention Basics - 3/31/25, Person-centered Care - 4/30/25, Normal Aging Process - 2/28/25, and Understanding Dementia - 3/31/25. Staff #34's trainings were due by these dates as follows: Abuse and Neglect - 2/28/25, Active Shooter Response - 4/30/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food trays and dinnerware in good condition and failed to store and serve food in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. This was evident during the initial and subsequent kitchen observations conducted during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/12/25 at 8:10 AM during the initial kitchen observation tour, the surveyor noted multiple dinner trays that were chipped at the edges and sides. The trays were stacked on a rack by the dish washing machine. In an interview with staff #24, a porter responsible for washing the dishes on 5/12/25 at 8:20 AM, he was asked about the chipped trays. He stated that they have lots of chipped trays which they use to serve food to the resident's during meals. He asked the surveyor if the trays should be thrown out and not be used. The surveyor referred him to his supervisors. On 5/13/25 at 09:20 AM on a second visit to the kitchen, the surveyor again observed chipped trays coming off the dish washer line.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-coverage) was provided to the residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but had benefit days remaining. This was evident for 2 (Resident #30 and Resident #420) of 3 randomly selected residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings included: Residents with Medicare Part A have certain rights and protections related to financial liability and appeals. The financial liability, appeal rights, and protections are communicated to beneficiaries through notices given by providers to residents who are being discharged from Medicare services but have Medicare benefit days remaining. The SNF ABN should be provided to residents/responsible parties in order to provide information so the resident/responsible party can make a decision to continue to receive services that may not be paid for by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for each service and treatment provided. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of the 28 sample size resident records reviewed during the survey process. Findings Included: BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) is a non-invasive respiratory treatment that uses air pressure to assist with breathing, particularly for conditions like sleep apnea, COPD, and other respiratory problems. On 05/12/25 at 11:48 AM, an observation of Resident #14's room revealed that the resident was on oxygen via nasal cannula with oxygen concentrator and the resident also had a Bi PAP machine at bedside. In an interview with Resident #14, he/she reported that he/she requires oxygen at all times and uses the Bipap machine to sleep. The resident expressed concern about discharge planning and the ability to receive the respiratory treatment upon discharge. On 05/19/25 at 10:16 AM, a review of the Resident #14's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a medical record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) revise care plans quarterly, 2) the inter-disciplinary team (IDT) failed to attend care plan meetings at the time of the quarterly revision, and 3) revise care plans with a change in the resident's condition. This was evident for 3 (Resident #2, #130, #46 ) of the 75 Residents reviewed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Care plans are developed for Residents to guide the care they receive in the facility. They describe residents' needs and the interventions to address them; they are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). and they must be reviewed and revised at least every quarter and/or as changes in the residents' conditions occur. The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by IDT, including: the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a complaint incident MD00195763, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive their showers on scheduled shower days. This was evident for 1(Resident #96 ) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/14/25 at 8:55 AM, a review of a complaint incident MD00195763 was completed. It stated that Resident #96 was not being bathed and because of the neglect, the patient's hair had to be cut off because it began to lock up. In an interview with Staff #25, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), on 5/14/25 at 2:00 PM, he was asked how often residents on the floor are scheduled for showers. He stated that they are scheduled two times a week and that they document this on their task sheet. He showed the surveyor where the shower schedules were posted on the wall and explained how it was broken down as to who gets showered, and which shift was responsible to give the shower to the residents. The surveyor then asked for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide fingernail grooming for a dependent resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) of 2 residents investigated for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) during the survey process. The findings include: On 05/14/25 at 08:27 AM, Resident #31 was observed with very long fingernails. The surveyor asked the Resident if he/she prefers long nails. The Resident stated that she/he had requested to have them cut. Resident also stated that his/her niece use to do his/her nails, but she had not visited in a while. A record review of Resident's care plan on 5/14/25 at 9:32 AM indicated that Resident had self-care deficit related to unsteady gait, balance, uncoordinated movement, ambulatory impairment, and weakness bilaterally. Further review of diagnosis revealed no history of diabetes. An Interview was conducted on 05/14/25 at 08:22 AM with Geriatric Nurse Aide (Staff #15). The surveyor asked GNA #15 what tasks were included in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for the residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that a resident received prescribed medication for 5 days, 2) ensure that a physician's order for a wound consultation was followed timely and 3) clarify a physician's order. This was evident for 3 (Resident # 389, #416 and #394) of 75 residents reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Tafamidis is a medication primarily used to treat transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. However Resident #389's hospital record showed that he/she had been used this medication for [name of cancer]. 1) On 5/13/2025, at 12:26 PM, the surveyor investigated complaints for Resident #389. One complainant reported that facility staff did not administer prescribed medication to the resident. A review of Resident #389's Medical Administration Record (MAR) for December 2024, conducted on 5/14/2025 at 7:58 PM, revealed the resident was prescribed Tafamidis 61mg by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received treatment and services as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #130) of 1 resident investigated for position and mobility during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Range of Motion (ROM) refers to moving a patient's joints and muscles to maintain or restore their physical abilities, and also to prevent further muscle degradation. Passive ROM is performed to prevent contractures and promote mobility in patients who are unable to move or reposition themselves on their own. Functional maintenance programs (FMP) in long-term care (LTC) are designed to help residents maintain their functional capabilities beyond the time spent in an active therapy program. Documentation of the services provided ensures medical necessity requirements. This program is particularly beneficial for residents who may be at higher risk for declining without therapy, therefore follow-up is essential to assess the program's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the complaint and medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide/document appropriate and sufficient services, treatment, and care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. This was evident for one (Resident #288) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: An indwelling urinary catheter (often known as a Foley catheter) is inserted similarly to an intermittent catheter but remains in place, secured in the bladder by a water-filled balloon. A complaint review on 5/15/2025, at 5:56 PM, revealed that Resident #288's family member reported concerns in December 2022. The family stated, the resident called crying around 12 PM because his/her Foley bag had not been emptied and had been so full. A review of Resident #288's medical records on 5/19/2025, at 7:05 AM, showed that the facility's attending provider documented in the History and Physical (H&P) on October 12, 2022, that Resident #288 had a Foley catheter draining clear urine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure drug records were maintained in a manner that allowed for reconciliation of dispensed and administered medication. This failure was evident for one resident (Resident #410) out of two residents reviewed for narcotic medication administration during this recertifiation/complaint survey. The findings include: Oxycodone is a narcotic medication used to treat moderate to severe pain. It carries a high risk for addiction and dependence and can cause respiratory distress and death when taken in high doses or when combined with other substances, especially alcohol or other illicit drugs such as heroin and cocaine. A controlled medication utilization record, known as a count sheet, is a form used to document controlled medication dispensing. It records details for each instance a controlled substance amount is removed from its original containers, including the date, time, dose given, the signature of the nurse administering the medication, the amount…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This was evident for two (2) errors identified out of 26 opportunities for error during medication pass observation. The findings include: On 5/13/2025 at 9:40 AM, during an observation of medication administration, Registered Nurse (RN #12) was observed dispensing 4 meds into 4 medication cups and after crushing the ones that were not in liquid form, she administered them to Resident #79 via a gastrostomy tube [G-tube (a medical device inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to provide nutrition, medications, and fluids when someone cannot swallow or cannot eat enough by mouth)]. Following the medication observation on 5/13/2025 at 2:19 PM, a review of Resident #79's May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed two active orders: Multivitamin & Mineral Oral Liquid (Multiple Vitamins w/ Minerals), Give 15 ml via G-Tube one time a day for supplement with start date 7/13/2023 and scheduled to be given at 10:10 AM; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident received dental services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #24) out of the 42 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: A member of the survey team interviewed Resident #24 on 5/12/25 at 9:19 AM. The resident said since I have been here, I have not seen a dentist and I would like to. I told them I would like some teeth at the meeting. A review of Resident #24's clinical record on 5/20/25 revealed the resident had not had a dental consultation since admission. The resident's comprehensive review of 2/26/24 noted the resident had missing teeth which means teeth were present at that time. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 5/20/25 at 10:44 AM. This surveyor asked if dental consultations/visits are conducted routinely. He replied that dental screens are done through HealthDrive. If a nurse, GNA [Geriatric Nursing Assistant], and/or nurse practitioner does an oral screening and observes a problem and/or if a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) A review of Resident #120's clinical record on 5/15/25 revealed staff charted that they provided daily and sometimes twice daily showers for the resident. The first floor Unit Manager (Staff #22) was interviewed on 5/15/25 at 11:58 AM. Asked him if the resident gets showers each week. He replied at least two every week and we try for more. He said the resident sometimes refuses but gets a bed bath once or twice a day. This surveyor showed him the set of shower sheets where it shows two to three showers a day. He said No way. It takes two and sometimes three staff to give a shower and never a tub bath. He said it is an education error. New staff are probably clicking 'yes' because they are in a hurry and probably only seeing the word bath not tub bath. The Regional Clinical Services Manager (Staff #4) was interviewed on 5/19/25 at 8:50 AM. This surveyor showed her the shower sheets and asked if she was aware of our concern. She replied that they were aware, confirmed the resident does not get two showers a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that 1) the facility failed to offer the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine to 1 (Resident #6) out of 5 Residents reviewed for immunizations; and 2) provide education about the risk and benefits to resident who refused the pneumococcal vaccine. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 5 Residents reviewed for immunizations during the survey. The findings include: Adults aged 65 and older should receive at least one dose of the pneumococcal vaccine. The frequency of additional doses depends on previous vaccination history and individual risk factors. If previously vaccinated, an additional dose is given one to five years after your last vaccination, education must be provided as it relates to the immunizations. On 05/20/25 at 11:07 AM the immunization record reviewed for Resident #6 indicated that the resident received the pneumococcal vaccine on 8/14/17. This was indicated on the final hospital discharge summary. Surveyor could not locate any documentation that the pneumococcal vaccine was given at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that every resident had access to a communication system to call for staff assistance, if needed. This is evident for 3 (Resident #100, #87, #40) of 8 resident's call bell accessibility observed during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Included: On 05/21/25 at 08:45 AM, a surveyor conducted an audit for call bell accessibility and function, during the audit the following concerns were identified: In an interview with Resident #95, he/she was asked if there was any concerns about the call light system, Resident #95 stated that his/her call bell was in good working condition, but the roommate's (Resident #100) call bell stop working a while ago. Resident #100 was not present for an interview; however, the surveyor attempted to use Resident #100's call bell and it was in-operable. At approximately 9:10 AM, the surveyor inquired with Resident #87 regarding the call light system and upon closer observation, it was noted that Resident #87's call bell was not within reach. Specifically,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of staff personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) are retrained on an annual basis. This was evident for 1 out of the 1 GNA's reviewed for skills and competencies. The findings include: A review of Staff #36's employee file revealed these required trainings were late and were due by these dates as follows: Abuse and Neglect - 2/28/25, Active Shooter Response - 4/30/25, Age-Specific Care - 2/28/25, Employee Safety Basics - 4/30/25, Fire Safety - 3/31/25, Infection Control and Prevention Basics - 3/31/25, Person-centered Care - 4/30/25, Normal Aging Process - 2/28/25, and Understanding Dementia - 3/31/25. The Regional Clinical Services Manager (Staff #4) was interviewed on 5/21/25 at 8:30 AM. This surveyor asked about the late trainings and if the employee files were simply not updated. She said she would check and stated that if the employee was hired less than a year ago then they might not be due. Staff #4 returned at 9:30 AM on 5/21/25 and confirmed the training list was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-08 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 7/28/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 3/31/22. Further review of the Resident's medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a notice regarding the transfer had been provided to the Resident or the Resident's responsible party. Interview with Regional Nurse #1 on 7/29/22 at 7:45 AM confirmed the facility had no evidence Resident #37 and the Resident's responsible party had been given written notification of the transfer to the hospital and the reason for the transfer. Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the residents, and residents' representative. This was found to be evident for 6 out of 7 (#3, #97 #103, #104, #225, and #37) residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigative of the survey. The findings include: 1. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans for residents (Resident #37, #64, #89, #113). This was evident for 4 out of 66 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the resident's needs and the ways of meeting the needs. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the individual's specific needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the resident. The care plan typically includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care. 1. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan addressing Resident #37's need for oxygen therapy. Observation of Resident #37 on 7/25/22 at 9:34 AM revealed the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident council members meeting and interviews It was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with enough nurse staffing. The finding includes: On 08/02/22 at 1:00 p.m. during resident council meeting with attending resident's #8, #33, #51, #82, and #110 who asked the Activity Director to be present during council meeting. Five members were interviewed when asked the question do you get the help and care you need without waiting a long time and does answer your call lights in a timely manner all five resident council members answered no, we must sit in our wheelchairs or in lay in bed for over a 1 hour in soiled incontinent briefs only for staff who don't change us this happens on weekend and night shifts. The staff comes turn off the call light and tell you I will be right back and don't return to help you until hours later. On 8/03/22 at 9:00 a.m. during interview with Corporate Regional Nurse was made aware of resident council concerns. The Administrator, Director of Nursing and Corporate Regional Nurse was aware of this concern prior and during survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-08 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations during the survey it was determined that the facility staff failed to post staffing information at the entrance to the facility. This was evident from the start of the survey until 8/5/22. The evidence is: During tours of the facility and observation when the surveyors entered and left the facility it was noted that there was no posting of the current nurse staffing information at the entrance for visitors and residents to see. Regional Nurse #1 was interviewed on 8/5/22 at 1:50 PM and informed of the findings.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that medication regimens were free from unnecessary medications (Residents #103, #315, #31 and #110). This is evident for 4 of 66 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to hold a medication when the heart rate and systolic blood pressure was (top number) below the set parameter. Medical record review on 8/5/22 at 8 AM for Resident #103 revealed on 7/1/11 the physician ordered: Amlodipine besylate tablet 5 mg give one tablet via Peg tube one time a day for hypertension hold for SBP less than 110 mmhg or heart rate less than 55bpm. Amlodipine is in a class of medications called calcium channel blockers. It lowers blood pressure by relaxing the blood vessels, so the heart does not have to pump as hard. A review of the Medication Administration Record revealed on 7/2 at 9 AM the facility staff documented the resident's SBP as 104 and on 7/19 at 9 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that food was served and handled in sanitary manner during lunch meal service and failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This practice has a potential of effecting all residents in facility. Finding includes: On 7/29/22 at 12:00 p.m. during observation of lunch meal service in main dining room. Surveyor observed staff member #8 was plating up hot resident lunch plates from hot meal cart without wearing required hair net to cover braid hair while handling food. During the same date and time this same staff member #8 was observed bare hand touching and handling hamburger buns serving in this meal observation. On 7/29/22 at 12:25 p.m. conducted interview with staff member #8 replied I forgot to put on a hair net. I was in a hurry to serve lunch. Staff member asked surveyor if he/she was required to plastic gloves while touching food. On 7/29/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most accurate form for residents (Resident #31, #89, #110 and #226). This was evident for 4 of 66 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. Review of Resident #89's medical record on 7/29/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include depression. Review of the Resident's physician orders revealed the Resident was ordered Mirtazapine 30 mg one time a day for appetite stimulant. Review of the Resident's psychiatric progress note on 3/30/22 revealed the Resident was receiving Mirtazapine 30 mg for depression. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to ensure residents received at least two showers each week (#26, #31, and #102). This was evident for 3 out of the 66 residents reviewed as part of the survey process. The findings are: 1. Resident #26 was interviewed on 7/27/22 at 9:18 AM. The resident stated that he/she was never offered a shower since admission and has only received bed baths. A review of the shower documentation for July and August in the clinical record revealed that the resident has only received a shower on 7/20 and 7/29. That works out to 2 out of 10 opportunities for showers. Regional Nurse #1 was interviewed on 7/27/27/22 at 9:18 AM. She was informed of the findings and confirmed that the resident received two showers since July. 2. Resident #31 was interviewed on 7/25/22 at 12:48 AM. The resident stated that he/she has not received a shower for awhile and bed baths are provided twice a week in the room. A review of the shower documentation in the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to properly manage the funds of a resident (Resident #109). This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: During interview with Resident #109 on 7/26/22 at 11:51 AM the Resident stated the facility has failed to pay his/her AARP (The American Association of Retired Persons) insurance coverage from his/her pension funds. The Resident stated he/she had the AARP insurance prior to coming to the facility and the facility agreed to pay using his/her funds when he/she was admitted to the facility. Resident also stated had that time he/she has received 2 late notices from AARP. Review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 7/26/22 the facility provided the surveyor a copy of the Resident's RFMS (Resident Fund Management Service) Resident statement that showed payments monthly for insurance premiums in the amount of $441.00. The Resident provided the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency which is the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 2 (#218 and #317) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 7/29/22 at 9:15 a.m. closed medical record review was conducted of the facility reported incident MD00168244 related to an allegation of verbal abuse involving resident #218 on 6/2/21. The facility documentation indicated the alleged incident was reported to the state agency on 6/4/21 which was two days after the alleged incident. Law enforcement agency documented reporting to facility on 6/4/21 arrival 9:24 p.m. The facility failed to report the abuse incident immediately not later than 2 hours of the event that caused the allegation. On 7/29/22 at 1:00 p.m. conduct staff interview with Corporate Regional Nurse verified these allegations had not been reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician for residents (Resident #37 and #315). This was evident for 2 out of 7 residents reviewed for skin conditions during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide wound care for Resident #37. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 7/29/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a physician order on 6/15/22 for wound care on left second finger daily. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the wound to be an arterial ulcer related to vascular insufficiency. Arterial wounds, also known as arterial ulcers, are painful injuries in your skin caused by poor circulation. During interview with Resident #37 on 8/3/22 at 11:28 AM, the Resident stated the facility staff are not changing his/her wound dressings daily. Review of Resident #37's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) on 8/3/22 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers for a resident (Resident #37). This is evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during an annual survey. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). The findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record on 7/29/22 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of adequate care to residents with indwelling urinary catheters (Residents #103). This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters during the annual survey. The Findings: A review of Resident #103's clinical record revealed that the resident's primary physician wrote an order on 6/30/2022, Patient has Foley catheter 16Fr; Balloon size 10ml, for stage 4 sacral ulcer. Provide catheter care every shift. On 07/26/22 at 10:22 AM an observation of resident #103's revealed the foley catheter tubing resting by the resident's left hip. At that time the Unit Manger was made aware of the findings and confirm that the resident did not have a foley catheter leg strap. On 8/5/22 at 1 pm interview with Regional Nurse revealed that catheter care does not include leg straps and a physician order will be obtained.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified about weight loss (#102), failed to recognize a resident's weight loss, reweigh and provide a dietary consult in a timely manner (#5), and failed to obtain ordered weights (#61). This was evident for 3 residents out of the 66 sampled as part of the survey. The evidence is: 1. A review of Resident #102's clinical record revealed that the resident has had a 22% weight loss since admission a year ago. There was no mention in the clinical record of the physician being contacted regarding this weight loss. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that on 8/2/21 the dietician wrote a note Resident readmitted after short stay hospital . Received IVF [Intravenous fluids] and IVABT [IV antibiotics] during hospital course. Wt [weight] 7/29 168.3#. Magic cup (nutritional supplement) was ordered to continue, and dietician added Med Pass 120 ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide oxygen therapy consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident (Resident #37). This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy during an annual survey. The findings include: Observation of Resident #37 on 7/25/22 at 9:34 AM revealed the Resident was wearing humidified oxygen at 2 liters nasal cannula. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 7/29/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have a physician order for oxygen. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the facility staff began documenting the Resident was wearing oxygen on 8/27/21. During interview with Resident #37 on 8/3/22 at 11:28 AM, the Resident stated he/she couldn't remember the exact date he/she began wearing oxygen but stated it has been a long time. Observation of the Resident's humidified oxygen revealed it was dated 7/28/22. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE LEONARD J ATTMAN 1995 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 10/25/1995
POWERS, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 10/01/2007
ATTMAN, GARYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007
POWERS, JEFFREYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
ATTMAN, LEONARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007
FINGLASS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007
SPADARO, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2013
FUTURE CARE HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007
FUTURECARE HEALTH & MANAGEMENT OF HOMEWOOD INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 15%Other / private 85%

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$487per resident / day
operating cost
$14,817per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$478per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215249. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next