Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation of

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 3 of 15 sampled residents (R3, R51, and R69). Findings include:Resident #51 (R51) A review of R51’s admission Record, dated 07/17/2025, revealed they were a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R51 had multiple diagnoses that included depression, bipolar disease, schizophrenia, and alcohol-induced disorder. R51’s admission Record also revealed they were their own responsible party (in charge of their own medical decisions). A review of R51’s Order Summary Report, dated 7/17/25, revealed R51 had physician orders for Benztropine Mesylate (a medication for Parkinson’s Disease and movement disorders from other diseases or side effects from antipsychotic medications) 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day and Bupropion (a medication for depression) 150 mg once a day. In addition, R51’s Order Summary Report revealed R51 was also prescribed Fluphenazine decanoate (an antipsychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to notify the responsible party of changes in conditions and treatment for one Resident (R5) of fifteen residents reviewed. Findings Resident #5 (R5) Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected R5 admitted to the facility 3/11/2018 with diagnoses that included: Traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Aphasia (inability or difficulty speaking), and Hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R5 was severely cognitively impaired. The EMR admission Record reflected Primary Contact (PC) K was the Guardian for R5. On 7/16/2025 at 11:16 AM a telephone interview was conducted with PC K who reported the facility had not always informed her of changes in status and care for R5. PC K reported several months ago she contacted the facility for an update on R5. PC K reported staff informed her R5 had been sick. PC K reported she contacted the facility a day or two later and was told by the facility R5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and implemented for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #40 and #5) reviewed for care plans. Findings: Resident #40 (R40) Review of an admission Record revealed R40 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Muscular Dystrophy and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of R40’s “Antigravity Team Note” dated 6/12/25 revealed, “Date of Fall: 6/11/25Root Cause(s) of Fall: Rolled from bed…New Interventions: Floor mats added…” Review of R40’s fall “Care Plan” on 7/16/25 at 12:09 PM and on 7/17/25 at 11:02 AM revealed, “I am at an increased risk for falls r/t (related to) muscular dystrophy, muscle weakness, DM II (diabetes type 2), depression, anxiety, chronic pain, scoliosis, history of falls. Date Initiated: 11/23/2023.” There was no intervention for the placement of a floor mat. During an interview on 07/18/2025 at 8:30 AM, Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #40 and #55) reviewed for medication administration. Findings:Resident #40 (R40) Review of an admission Record revealed R40 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Muscular Dystrophy and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The diagnosis of dysphagia was added to her diagnosis list on 12/1/23. Review of R40’s “Care Plan” revealed no entries that R40 could self-administer medications. Review of R40’s “Self-Administration of Medication Evaluation” revealed the assessment for self-administering medications was last completed on 8/10/23 (prior to the dysphagia diagnosis). Review of R40’s “SLP (Speech Language Pathology) Screen” dated 11/27/23 revealed R40 did not have the physical capacity to swallow without difficulty and had difficult/painful swallowing and would cough/choke with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure insulin was administered and monitored following the provider order and 2.) ensure abnormal blood sugar results were reported to the provider for 3 of 15 residents (Resident #40, #10, and #64) reviewed for insulin administration.Findings:Resident #40 (R40) Review of an admission Record revealed R40 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Muscular Dystrophy Review of R40's Order Summary dated 5/3/25 revealed, HumaLOG KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject 4 unit subcutaneously with meals for DM2 In addition to sliding scale insulin. Hold if BS <100 (blood sugar less than 100) or not eating.Review of R40's June Medication Administration Record and Blood Sugar Summary revealed that on 6/24/2025 at 08:06 AM R40's blood sugar was 93 and the 4 units of Humalog was administered. (The sliding scale insulin was not administered due to her blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device for one Resident (R15) of fifteen residents reviewed. Findings: Resident #15 (R15) Review of the medical record reflected R15 admitted to the facility 10/21/2019 with the pertinent diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (a condition when breathing stops while sleeping due to a blockage of the windpipe). The medical record reflected that R15 used a CPAP device (the device that consisted of a pressure module that delivered breathable air under pressure via tubing from the device to a mask worn while sleeping to keep the windpipe open) to treat this condition. On 7/16/2025 at 10:09 AM an observation and interview were conducted with R15 in her room. It was observed that R15 had a CPAP device that was not in use and the mask was not stored in a bag. Review of the CPAP filter revealed it was moderately soiled. R15 reported that staff had not cleaned her CPAP in a long time. On 7/17/2025 at 10:53 AM during an observation and interview with R15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were properly dispensed and documented for 3 of 15 residents (Residents #2, #4, and #25) reviewed for controlled medication administration. Findings:Resident #2 (R2) Review of an admission Record revealed R2 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: osteoporosis. Review of R2's Order Summary dated 5/26/25 revealed, tramadol HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for PAIN.Review of R2's Controlled Substance Proof-Of-Use Record revealed that on 7/1/25, 7/2/25, 7/3/25, and 7/14/25 the evening doses of tramadol were documented as dispensed.Review of R2's July Medication Administration Record revealed that on 7/1/25, 7/2/25, 7/3/25, and 7/14/25 the evening doses of tramadol were documented as not administered. Review of R2's Controlled Substance Proof-Of-Use Record revealed that on 7/4/25 there were no doses of tramadol documented as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 6 residents (R52 and R60) observed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.66% (2 errors of 30 medications administered).Findings include:R52A review of R52's admission Record, dated 7/18/25, revealed they were a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R52's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included Vitamin D deficiency.During an observation on 7/16/25 at 8:25 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E administered eleven medications to R52, including Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50 mcg (micrograms) (2000 International Units (IU)).A review of R52's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 7/1/25 to 7/18/25, revealed LPN E should have administered cholecalciferol 1000 units on 7/16/25, not cholecalciferol 2000 units.During an interview on 7/16/25 at 12:18 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label medications in 1 of 2 medication carts (Northeast/ Northwest Split Medication Cart) observed for medication storage.Findings include: During an observation on 07/16/2025 at 8:35 AM, the Northeast/Northwest Split Medication Cart was inspected with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. The following observations were made: - Incruse Ellipta 62.5 mcg/act discus box labeled with R52's name. However, the discus in the box was not labeled with R52's name and/or any other resident identifying information. - Fluticasone propionate 50 mcg/act nasal spray box labeled with R52's name. However, the nasal spray was not labeled with R52's name and/or any other resident identifying information. During an interview on 07/16/2025 following the inspection of the Northeast/Northwest Split Medication Cart at 8:35 AM, LPN E stated, They (the discus and nasal spray) should be labeled [with the resident's name] so we know if they are in the right box. LPN E also stated the discus, and nasal spray should be labeled with the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1239234:Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment for 2 residents (R7 and R17) reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings include: On 7/11/2025 the Long-Term Care Ombudsman reported that the facility was odoriferous (unpleasant smell) during recent visits. On 7/15/2025 at 11:04 AM a strong smell of urine was noted at and around the Nurse's Station at the South East/West Hall becoming more pronounced down the hall past room [ROOM NUMBER] and continued to room [ROOM NUMBER] before subsiding but still notable. Due to the strong prevalence of the odor in the area the source could not immediately be isolated. Resident #7 (R7) Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility 5/3/2024 with pertinent diagnoses that included Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R7 was occasionally incontinent of urine and was not on a toileting program. The Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION POINT HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI