Intersect Healthcare of Roscommon

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 86.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 36.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 3/9/2026 at 4:17 PM there was an observed lack of hot water at the two hand sinks in the kitchen. The hand sink closest to the maintenance hallway was observed to have hot water at 81 degrees, and the hand sink on the other end of the kitchen closest to the dish machine room was observed at 80 degrees, as registered on a probe thermometer. On 3/9/2026 at 11:35 AM the dish machine room hand sink temperature was recorded at 82 degrees and the sink closest to the maintenance hall at 80 degrees, using a probe thermometer. During this observation, Maintenance Director G stated that the water heater was recently replaced and the mixing valve was turned down too low. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-202.12 Handwashing Sink, Installation. (A) A HANDWASHING SINK shall be equipped to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a change in bowel health for one Resident (#20) of one resident reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for constipation, intestinal blockage and discomfort.Findings include:Resident #20 (R20)Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/2025, revealed R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, heart failure, right side hemiplegia, bilateral foot amputation, and diabetes. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R20 received hemodialysis treatment, required supervision/touching assistance with transfers and scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the Resident was cognitively intact.On 3/10/2026 at 8:47 a.m., R20 was observed seated on the edge of his bed eating breakfast. R20 was not wearing a shirt and a dialysis access line was observed to be in place in his upper arm right. R20's meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:(1) the correct dosage of medication was administered and(2) medication administration according to manufacturer recommendations for two Residents (R28 and R38) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 6.4% from 2 of 31 opportunities for error.Findings include:Resident #28 (R28) On 3/10/26 at 8:08 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was observed administering medications to R28 who required medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a tube in the abdominal wall to provide direct access to the stomach for nutrition, fluids, and medication).LPN A added water to a 30 ml (milliliter) plastic medication cup containing a crushed medication tablet. The medication did not dissolve in the water and LPN A used a plastic spoon to stir the medication in the cup. When the medication was stirred in the 30 ml cup, the medication began spilling over the sides of the cup onto the bedside table. LPN A continued to stir…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications in one medication cart of two medications carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On 3/10/26 at 7:58 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared 11 medications in a medication cup for Resident #15 (R15). LPN A placed the cup of medications on the overbed table in R15's room while she replaced a medication patch on R15's left upper posterior arm. After placing the medication patch, LPN A picked up the cup of medications from the overbed table to administer the medications. R15 told LPN A he didn't want the medications at that time. LPN A took the cup of medications back to the medication cart and placed the cup of medications in the top drawer of the medication cart.On 3/10/26 at 8:08 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A then proceeded to prepare seven medications for Resident #28 (R28), including a losartan tablet (medication to treat high blood pressure) obtained from a blister pack (a medication packaging system that holds individual doses of medication in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide barriers for resident care equipment and maintain infection control practices during medication administration for four Residents (#10, #15, #28, & #38) of seven residents reviewed for infection prevention and control.Findings include:Resident #10 (R10)R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documented R10 had chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and required supplemental oxygen and a non-invasive ventilator (respiratory support device). On 3/9/26 at 2:05 PM, R10 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (an oxygen delivery device that provides supplemental oxygen through the nostrils) connected to an oxygen concentrator. An additional nasal cannula was connected to a portable oxygen tank on the back of R10's wheelchair. The nasal cannula on the portable oxygen tank was unbagged and lying across the back of R10's wheelchair without a barrier (a barrier is an item…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to address fall prevention were implemented for two Residents (#5 & #6) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings Include: Resident #5 (R5) Review of the care plan revealed R5 was identified on 11/21/23 at risk for accidents, injuries, and falls r/t (related to) hx (history) of falls with major injury, insomnia, heart failure, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease) & emphysema with dependence on oxygen, impaired mobility and balance, generalized weakness, forgetfulness, impaired vision . Interventions on 11/21/23 included: Be sure my call light is within reach and encourage me to use it for assistance as needed. I need prompt response to all requests for assistance. Ensure that I am wearing non-skid footwear prior to assisting me with transfers and/or ambulation. Reduce my risk for falling by cleaning up spills or clutter from my floor, provide glare-free lighting, accessible working call light, bed set at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain accurate and complete documentation for 15-minute safety checks for two Residents (#5 & #6) of two residents reviewed for documentation related to 15-minute safety checks. Findings include: Resident #5 (R5) Review of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), dependence of supplemental oxygen, heart failure, Type II diabetes, presence of artificial eye, and legal blindness. R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R5 was cognitively intact. R5 was identified as a fall risk on 11/21/23 as indicated during review of their care plan. R5's care plan was updated on 8/14/24 after a fall with injury, to include 15-minute visual safety checks due to cognitive impairment, failure to use call light consistently, and frequent attempts to ambulate unassisted. R5's Current Care Record was updated to 15-minute checks Q (every) 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) Ensure proper hand sanitizing during hall tray pass; (2) Ensure donning of proper personal protective equipment (PPE) in droplet precaution resident rooms and; (3) Ensure disinfection of an insulin pen prior to returning it to the medication storage cart during a facility influenza outbreak, (4) Ensure infection control practice was maintained for respiratory equipment, (5) Ensure opened containers of distilled water were dated for proper identification of expiration and discarding. These deficient practices resulted in the potential for transmission of infections and further spread of an influenza outbreak to all 36 facility residents and staff. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 1/18/21, with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sleep apnea. R1 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a resident's urostomy for complications, skin integrity, and proper function for one Resident (#238) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder. Findings include: Resident #238 (R238) A review of medical records indicated R238 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, history of malignant neoplasm of bladder, acquired absence of other parts of urinary tract, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. On 2/9/25 at 1:54 PM, R238 was interviewed and indicated they had a urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening [stoma] in the abdomen to divert urine from the kidneys directly into a bag on the outside of the body) and was currently being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). R238 stated the urostomy had been present for about three years and they were accustomed to caring for it themselves. R238 stated facility staff had asked R238 to alert the facility if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store topical treatment medication for one Resident (#1) of twelve residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 1/18/21, with diagnoses including obesity. R1 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of intact cognition. On 2/9/25 at 10:10 AM, R1 was observed in her room, lying in bed. R1 had a tube of Nystatin (an antifungal or anti-yeast cream) 100,000 units per 30 grams sitting on her nightstand. The topical cream order for application was completed two days ago according to the physician's order below. Review of R1's physician order, dated 12/1/24, read, Nystatin External Cream 100,000 units/gram, apply to vaginal folds topically every shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 7th every month for preventative skin care and candidiasis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION POINT HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $686K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI