Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehab Center of D

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Properly store food items in the kitchen; 2. Remove undated, unlabeled food from the kitchen walk-in cooler and resident refrigerators; and 3. Adequately clean kitchen surfaces. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen and resident refrigerators, resulting in an increased potential for foodborne illness.Findings include:On 1/21/2026 beginning at 9:41 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Kitchen Manager (KM) A. During the tour, the following items were observed:-in the walk-in cooler two containers of chicken soup undated KM A said the soup was for staff and should not be in the cooler.-one box of opened turkey lunch meat undated. KM A said the box should be labelled and dated.-one box of opened raw hamburgers dated 12/1/26. KM A said the date is wrong and was not sure when they were opened or if they are still good.-one tray of uncovered, unlabeled, undated fish. KM A said the fish should be covered, labelled and dated. -in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was obtained for one resident (R9) of one resident reviewed for PASARR, resulting in R9 not being screened for mental health services and the potential for care needs being unmet.Findings include:On 1/23/26 at 10:50 A.M. review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R9 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: restlessness and agitation, irritability and anger, profound intellectual disabilities, other developmental disorders of scholastic skills. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R9 had severe cognitive impairment (BIMs=1) and required supervision for most activities of daily living.On 1/23/26 at 11:00 A.M., Social Worker (SW) C was interviewed about R9's Level 11, a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority which cannot be completed by the facility. This evaluation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply a wheelchair cushion for one resident (R4) with a stage three Sacro Coccyx (base of spine) pressure injury (Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin loss Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include:On 1/21/2026 at 12:54 PM, R4 was interviewed about care in the facility and stated, I don't have a wheelchair cushion and my bottom hurts. I would like one. R4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair without a wheelchair cushion.On 1/22/2026 at 11:41 AM, R4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair without cushion in the first-floor dining room.On 1/22/2026 at 2:43 PM, R4 was observed with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E sitting in a wheelchair without a wheelchair cushion. When LPN E was asked about R4's wheelchair LPN E stated, R4 does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff verified tube placement prior to administering medication through a PEG tube for one resident (R6) of two residents reviewed for tube placement. This deficient practice had the potential to result in improper medication administration and resident harm.Findings include:On 1/22/2026 at 1:49 PM, observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B administer medication through a R6 PEG tube without checking tube placement prior to administration.On 1/23/2026 at 11:01 AM LPN B was interviewed and confirmed they did not check placement before administering the medication. LPN B said they checked placement when they administered morning medication and that is why they did not check when they administered afternoon medications. LPN B said they should check PEG tube placement prior to every use.On 1/23/2026 at 12:06 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON said staff are expected to verify PEG tube placement every time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided respiratory care in accordance with acceptable standards of clinical practice during deep suctioning for one resident (R6) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased oxygenation and respiratory compromise.Findings include:On 1/22/2026 at 1:39 PM, observed License Practical Nurse (LPN) B provide deep suctioning to R6. LPN B did not provide hyperoxygenation prior to initiating deep suctioning.On 1/23/2026 at 11:41 AM, LPN B was interviewed and said they did not know they should have hyper oxygenated the resident before deep suctioning. The nurse said they can see the need for hyper oxygenating because oxygen saturation could drop during the deep suctioning process.On 1/23/2026 at 12:24 PM, interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) and they said nursing staff go through a competency check-off and they expect nursing staff to hyper oxygenate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2588852Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of misappropriation of funds for one (R402) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of funds.A review of the facility's incident report was received by the State Agency via online submission on 8/1/25 revealed the following: Incident Summary Unauthorized charges have been made on (R402) debit card. Card was cancelled and Detroit Police Department was notified.Investigation Summary Analysis: (R402) admitted to (this facility) on 5/10/2024.On 8-01-2025 (Nursing Home Administrator), was notified by the (Business Office Manager) that she received an alert by phone regarding (R402's) (bank) account. The alert showed that someone was attempting to withdrawal $800.00 from the account. (Business Office Manager) immediately responded to the alert, notifying the fraud department at the bank. The card was cancelled immediately. The resident (R402) was interviewed regarding (their)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary physical environment in the Dietary Department, resulting in a potential for contamination of food from soiled ceiling tiles and corroded, rusted vents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 50 residents that received meals and/or food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 12/11/2024 at 12:00 P.M. during a follow up observation in the kitchen four of five ceiling vents were observed soiled with grease, rust and corroded discolored areas. The tiles around the perimeter of the vent exiting the doorway to the tray line had visible black, greasy, lint spots. During the observation Dietary Manager C was queried concerning who was responsible for cleaning of the vents in the kitchen. The manager indicated the department had a porter who had recently cleaned the vents, but the areas observed on the vents were rust and the vents needed to be replaced. The manager indicated the outer portions of the vents had been recently cleaned but the inner lining and adjacent ceiling tiles required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to revise care plans in a timely manner for three residents (R10, R260, and R7) out of 14 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R10 On 12/10/24 at 9:59 AM R10's guardian was interviewed and stated that R10 has had recent falls and was concerned. Record review of R10's electronic health records (EHR) revealed admission into the facility on 3/8/23 with pertinent diagnoses of epilepsy, and traumatic brain injury. According to the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], R18 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Record review of R10's fall report dated 10/6/24 revealed that Resident observed on floor next to bed laying on his back no c/o (complaints) pain nor distress noted, resident verbally responsive. Record review of R10's active care plans revealed the following: Focus: I had an actual fall on 10/6/24 revision on 12/11/24. Goal I will exhibit less behaviors resulting in me placing myself on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directive was completed for one resident (R210) of fourteen residents reviewed resulting in the potential for inaccurate life sustaining measures or withholding medical treatment. Findings include: On 12/10/24, at approximately 2:00 PM, record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R210 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Respiratory Failure, and Muscle Weakness. In addition, R210 was being treated for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, (CRE). CRE is a bacterium which is resistant to certain antibiotics. There was no signed Advance Directive. According to admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R210 had moderately impaired cognition. R210 required extensive one-person assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). On 12/12/24 at 9:10 AM, Social Worker G was interviewed regarding R210's Advance Directive and said while looking and calling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hair care for one resident (R1) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), resulting in poor grooming. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 1:25 P.M. R1 was observed sitting in the hallway outside of her room. R1's hair was observed loose around the front portion of the resident's face and the back braids had scattered patches of unbraided rows. The resident's scalp was dry in appearance and unkempt. R1 was observed on 12/11/24 at 12:00 P. M during lunch in the main dining room and on 12/12/24 at 8:14 A.M. exiting the elevator going to activities. R1's hair was not groomed, and the resident's hair remained in the same condition as it was observed on 12/10/24. Review of the admission Record for R1 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Down Syndrome, Diabetes Mellitus, dry eye syndrome, seizure disorder and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION POINT HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI