Briarwood Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 95.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of facility investigation, physician interview, review of bed user service manual, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #01 was provided adequate supervision during the provision of activities of daily living. Resident #01 was cognitively impaired, and dependent on staff for transfer and bed mobility with bilateral lower extremity contractures. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, actual harm and death beginning on [DATE] at 10:11 A.M. when two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) directed attention away from Resident #01, who was lying in bed on her left side with the bed elevated. Resident #01 rolled from the elevated bed and fell to the floor, sustaining a laceration to the scalp requiring six staples, acute odontoid process fracture (second cervical vertebra [C2] in the neck) and closed displaced fracture of first cervical vertebra (C1 in the neck). On [DATE] Resident #01 expired as a result of the injuries sustained at the time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident council meeting minutes and staff interview, the facility failed to respond to resident concerns addressed in resident council meetings. This affected two residents (#242 and #249) of four residents reviewed for Resident Council. The facility census was 95.1.Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes (RCMM) dated 07/01/25 revealed concerns with the dietary department. Further review revealed there was no evidence of action taken to address residents' concerns. Interview on 09/15/25 at 12:12 P.M. with the Administrator verified she was unable to locate evidence of staff action taken in response to concerns brought up by residents during the August 2025 Resident Council Meeting (RCM). 2. Review of the RCMM for 08/05/25 revealed residents' voiced concerns of receiving their medications late on the weekends due to nurse helping the aides. Nurses were sitting medications at bed side and leaving. Also, residents voiced concerns of sheets not fitting bigger sized beds. 2. Review of 08/05/25 RCMM revealed on the weekends residents were getting their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete residents' showers as scheduled. This affected three residents (#249, #242, and #212) of three residents reviewed for showers. The census was 951.Review of the medical record for Resident #249 revealed an admission date of 03/06/23 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #249 a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating impaired cognition. He required set-up or clean up assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of Resident #249's shower sheets for the past 14 days revealed the following: 09/02/25 not applicable, 09/05/25 no shower given, 09/25/25 shower given, and 09/12/25 not applicable. Further review revealed Resident #249's scheduled shower days were Tuesdays and Fridays. Interview on 09/15/25 at 10:00 A.M. with Resident #249 revealed the resident needs help with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for a resident positive with COVID-19. This affected one (Resident #249) of one resident reviewed for COVID-19 precautions. The facility census was 62.Review of the medical record for Resident #249 revealed an admission date of 03/06/23. The resident was admitted with diagnosis of COVID-19.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. This resident was assessed to require set or clean-up assistance for bathing, dressing, and toileting.Review of the progress note dated 09/09/25 revealed Resident #249 tested positive for COVID-19 and was placed in droplet isolation for ten days. Observation on 09/15/25 at 10:00 A.M. Resident #249 and Resident #242 were talking by Resident #242's doorway. Resident #242 was standing just outside of Resident #249's door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, local health department staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report norovirus cases and multiple resident's gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (nausea/vomiting/diarrhea) to the local health department. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents of the facility. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/22. Diagnoses listed included chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, and morbid obesity. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Review of progress notes revealed Resident #4 was not feeling well and was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation on 02/25/25. Resident #4 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of hospital documentation revealed Resident #4 tested positive for norovirus on 02/25/25. 2. Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Application Gateway, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident physical abuse to the state agency. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/30/21. Diagnoses listed included Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder, hearing loss, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was rarely understood by staff. Review of progress notes revealed on 03/21/25 at 8:30 P.M. Resident #19 was walking with her walker and came to stop in front of of an empty recliner in the common area. A resident sitting in a nearby chair began yelling at Resident #19. A third resident came into the area and told Resident #19 to move. Resident #19 has confusion, and did not move. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staffing record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a Director of Nursing (DON) full time at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 86 residents. Findings include: Interview on 09/30/24 at 7:17 A.M. at the time of entrance with the Administrator revealed there was no DON employed at the facility. A second interview with the Administrator on 10/01/24 at 10:11 A.M. revealed the facility had not had a DON or acting DON since 09/18/24. Record review of the staffing sheets from 09/23/24 through 09/29/24 revealed no DON had been scheduled.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review and interview the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNAs) had 90 day evaluations and/or annual performance evaluations. This affected four of six employee files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of employee file for STNA #353 with hire date of 05/14/19 revealed no annual evaluation for July of 2023 or any for 2024. 2. Review of employee file for STNA #374 with hire date of 11/06/18 revealed no annual evaluation for 2020, 2021, and 2023. 3. Review of employee file for STNA #370 with hire date of 01/10/24 revealed no 90 day evaluation. 4. Review of employee file for STNA #331 with hire date of 10/05/23 revealed no 90 day evaluation. Interview on 08/08/24 at 11:04 A.M. with Human Resources (HR #508) verified the evaluations were not in the employee files for STNAs #353, #374, #370, and #331.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) completed 12 hours of education. This affected two of three STNA files reviewed for annual training. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of employee file for STNA #353 with hire date of 05/14/19 revealed no education training for 2023 or 2024. 2. Review of employee file for STNA #389 with hire date of 02/09/22 revealed no education training for 2023 or 2024. Interview on 08/08/24 at 11:02 A.M. with Executive Director (ED) verified the employees were not compliant with their education. ED stated the employees are scheduled to take courses. Review of policy titled, Inservice Education, dated 10/2003 revealed Nursing Assistants are required to have 12 hours of training per year calculated from their date of hire.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and the review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop and initiate a care plan in regards to a corrective device for a resident. This affected one resident (#195) of three residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #195 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #195 included post surgical care for digestive tract, overactive bladder, sciatica, and pulmonary hypertension. Further review of Resident #195's list of diagnoses revealed there were no diagnosis relating to a fracture of the leg noted in the medical records. Review of Resident #195's care plans dated 07/26/24 revealed no focus for the plan of care for a walking cast. Review of Resident #195's physician orders revealed no orders for a walking cast. Observation and interview on 08/05/24 at 11:22 A.M. with Resident #195 revealed the resident was alert and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor bruises once observed. This affected one resident (#59) of one resident reviewed for bruising. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 03/29/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, dementia, anxiety, pain in right hip, and syncope and collapse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with no behaviors. Resident #59 required supervision/touching assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 07/10/24 revealed Resident #59 was at risk for bleeding/bruising related to platelet aggregated therapy. Interventions included medications as tolerated and monitor for signs and symptoms of bruising or bleeding every shift. Review of current physician orders for Resident #59 revealed clopidogrel (blood thinner) 75 milligrams (mg) daily and monitor for signs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-08-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $456K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH