No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hempfield Manor

1118 Woodward Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (724) 836-4424 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jul 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
44 S Washington Ave · (724) 836-1862 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Omnicare0.4 mi
1152 Garden St · (724) 832-1233 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4589 Pennsylvania 136 · (724) 836-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Park
311 Willow Crossing Rd · (724) 219-3421 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4497 State Route 136 · (724) 837-8790

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.9%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.9%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.5%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.5%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%9.5%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 48.4–71.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.2–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.3–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
35.7%
Total nursing turnover
38.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement that created an immediate jeopardy situation for one of 29 cognitively impaired residents (Resident R1).Findings Include: Review of the facility, Missing Resident Policy dated 12/2/25, indicated the facility will take all necessary steps to locate a resident that is missing. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (bladder problems due to disease or injury of the nervous system involved in the control of urination), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and high blood pressure. Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated that Resident R1 has severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility diagnosis list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed effectively manage the facility to protect residents from elopement. This failure resulted in a resident exiting the building unsupervised (Resident R1). This failure created an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of 29 cognitively impaired residents (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated the NHA, directs the overall operations of the care community in accordance with current local, state, and federal regulations governing long-term care in-order to ensure the highest level of care is provided to each resident.Review of the facility-provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description indicated the DON, Manages and directx resident care within the nursing department in-order to maintain standards of resident care and ensure each resident functions at his/her highest level.Based on findings identified in this report, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility documents, clinical record review as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident needs for seven of nine residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9).Findings include: Review of the facility, Nursing Services Policy dated 12/2/25, indicated the facility will have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. During an interview on 5/27/26, at 2:36 p.m. when asked if the facility maintained sufficient staff to care for residents, Resident R1 stated, No. We wait a long time for care. I push the button but no one is coming. Observation at this time revealed Resident R1 to have greasy appearing hair. During an interview with Resident R2 and R3 on 5/27/26, at 2:40 p.m. when asked if the facility maintained sufficient staff to care for residents, Resident R2 stated, No and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policy and facility documents, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain grievance forms can be filed anonymously in four of four locations where grievance information is available. (front lobby, resident lounges between unit's A/B and C/D - grievance boxes with grievance forms are in front of the activity department and in resident lounges between unit's A/B and C/D). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Grievances last reviewed 12/2/25, indicated A formal grievance must be submitted in writing to the Grievance Officer and signed by the resident or the person filing the grievance on behalf of the resident. During an observation on 3/19/26 between 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. revealed the grievance policy/procedure posted in the facility did not contain wording that a grievance form can be filed anonymously. Grievance forms available at grievance box location did not contain wording that a grievance form can be filed anonymously. During an interview on 3/19/26, at 9:00 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for four of 25 residents (Resident R5, R14. R43, and R60).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Resident R5 had an ARD of 2/13/26, with an MDS completion date of 3/2/26.Resident R14 had an ARD of 2/11/26, with an MDS completion date of 2/26/26.Resident R43 had an ARD of 10/30/25, with an MDS completion date of 11/13/26.Resident R60 had an ARD of 9/26/25, with an MDS completion date of 10/1425. During an interview on 3/20/26, at 2:27 p.m. the Resident Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 18 of 28 residents (Resident R4, R12, R20, R29, R48, R53, R56, R63, R74, R85, R90, R95, R100, R101, R102, R103, R114, R119).Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated the following instructions: -Section C: Cognitive Patterns - Resident interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, one is available.-Section D: Mood - Resident interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, one is available.-Section O: Special Treatments,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and maintain oxygen equipment for four of eight sampled residents (Residents R2, R46, R61, and R138).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Oxygen by Nasal Cannula last reviewed on 12/2/25, indicated Cannula and tubing to be replaced weekly. Label with resident's name and date. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/2/26, indicated the diagnoses of respiratory failure (lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide from it), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent feelings of worry, fear and uneasiness). Review of Resident R2's current physician orders, indicated resident is on 3 liters per minute of oxygen.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and facility documents (grievance and staffing) reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for fourteen of twenty-three residents (Residents R1, R9, R12, R16, R23, R40, R44, R46, R64, R500, R501, R502, R503, and R505).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Nursing Services Policy last reviewed on 12/2/25, indicated that The Manor will have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Conduct of Nursing Personnel answer call lights promptly. During a group interview, on 3/17/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m., when asked if they felt the facility maintained enough staff to care for resident needs and answer call lights, consensus from the group was no. Residents verbalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make sure that medical supplies and medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in one of two medication rooms (A/B Nursing Unit).Findings include: Review the facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated [DATE], indicated that outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated items will be removed from stock. During an observation of the A/B nursing unit medication room on [DATE], at approximately 12:32 p.m. the following was observed: (42) 25-gauge needles with an expiration date of [DATE].(2) 25-gauge needles with an expiration date of [DATE].(1) insulin syringe without sterile wrapping.(41) 22-gauge safety syringes with an expiration date of [DATE].(37) viral transport swabs with an expiration date of [DATE].(15) 5 milliliter syringes with an expiration date of [DATE].(1) saline enema with an expiration date of 02/2026.(2) feeding tube connector sets with an expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides (Employees E6 and E7).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, Nursing Assistants are required to have 12 hours of training per year calculated from their date of hire. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/9/24. with approximately 2.00 hours in-service education between 1/9/25, through 1/9/26. Review of NA Employee E7's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/10/23 with 6.50 hours in-service education between1/10/25, through 1/10/26. During an interview on 3/20/26, at approximately 2:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for five of sixteen residents (Resident R9, R30, R74, R502, and R504).Findings include: Review of the Resident Rights policy last reviewed 12/2/25, indicated that the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the Manor. The Manor will protect and promote the rights of each resident, including: A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident 's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident and staff interviews, observation, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain routine services from an eye care professional and failed to accurately document the need for vision care for one of five residents (Resident R12).Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 10/22/25, indicated the facility will provide vision care for vision loss, cataracts, glaucoma, and macular degeneration. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/5/26, included diagnoses of Parkinsonism (group of neurological disorders characterized by tremors, stiffness, slowness of movement, and difficulty maintaining balance), Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), and a seizure disorder. Section B: Hearing, Speech, and Vision indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation for five of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E5, E6, and E7).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Included in the list of topics was Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation and Reporting Crimes Pursuant to the Elder Justice Act.Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on the prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation.Review of Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/12/19. Review of RN Employee E3's training record for 2/12/25, through 2/12/26, did not include training on the prevention of abuse, neglect, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for four of ten staff members (Employees E2, E5, E6, and E7).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Included in the list of topics was Prevention and Control of Infections / Standard Precautions. Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on infection control. Review of the Activity Employee E5's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/6/06. Review of Activity Employee E5's training record for 1/6/25, through 1/6/26, did not include training on infection control. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/9/24. Review of NA Employee E6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, document review, resident interviews, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prompt assistance to meet residents care needs for ten of twenty residents who require care (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10). Based on facility policy, document review, resident interviews, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prompt assistance to meet residents care needs for ten of twenty residents who require care (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10). Findings included: Review of facility policy Resident Rights last reviewed 12/4/24, indicated in part The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to person and services inside and outside the Manor. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing the required Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of nine residents (Resident R1). Review of the facility Missing Resident Policy dated 12/4/24, indicated the facility will complete all necessary steps to locate any resident that is missing from a community. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/1/24, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), high blood pressure, and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of an Elopement Risk Assessment completed on 3/19/25, indicated Resident R1 was at risk for elopement. Review of the physician's order dated 2/18/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make accessible grievance boxes to residents on two of two nursing unit resident lounge areas (East and [NAME] Wings). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Grievances reviewed 1/6/25, all persons will be provided with an opportunity to present these complaints through a formal grievance procedure. During an observation on 3/4/25, at 11:25 a.m. revealed the grievance box and forms were not accessible on the East and [NAME] nursing unit resident lounge areas. The grievance boxes had been placed on a shelf, out of the reach of residents in wheelchairs. During an interview on 3/4/25, at 11:40 a.m. The Activity Director Employee E1 confirmed the facility failed to make accessible grievance boxes to residents on two of two nursing units resident lounge areas (East and [NAME] Wings). During an interview on 3/5/25, at 2:45 p.m. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to make accessible grievance boxes to residents on two of two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident interviews, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prompt assistance to meet residents care needs for two of ten residents who require care (Residents R14 and R49). Findings included: Review of facility policy Resident Rights last reviewed 1/06/25, indicated the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment throughout the facility (resident rooms) for three of four nursing units. (A, C, and D nursing units). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Environment Policy dated 1/6/25, indicated the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. During an observation of the facility on 3/7/25, at 1:00 p.m., the following was revealed: A Wing resident rooms 5W, 2W, 13W, and 14W (window) air condition/heating unit had dusty debris on the unit. C Wing resident rooms 33W, 43W, 45W, and 47W (window) air condition/heating unit had dusty debris on the unit. D Wing resident rooms 54W, 55W, 58W, and 59W (window) air condition/heating unit had dusty debris on the unit. During an interview on 3/7/25, at 1:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a homelike environment on three of four nursing units. Pa Code: 207.2 (a) Administrator's responsibility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that included instructions to provide person centered care for two of five residents (Residents R4 and R86). Findings include: Review of facility's policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 12/4/24, indicated the facility will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/18/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia. Review of Resident R4's current care plan dated 9/12/24, failed to reveal a care plan with goals and interventions for dementia. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R86 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan for one of five residents (Resident R4) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident and care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 1/6/25 indicated the facility will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/18/24, indicated the diagnoses of dementia, depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), the resident is alert and oriented and able to make needs known. Review of Resident R4's physician order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility job description, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of four residents observed (Resident R57). Review of the facility Registered Nurse (RN) job description, revised 2/07, indicated the RN must function within the scope of practice according to the State Board of Nursing. Administers medication and treatments as prescribed by the physician. Assumes responsibility for his/her own professional competence. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/10/25, included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and orthostatic hypotension (decrease in blood pressure after rising from laying or sitting). During an observation on 3/3/25 at approximately 11:29 a.m. RN Employee E2 administered medication to Resident R57 while Resident 57 was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain ongoing communication with the hemodialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) center for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R59). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Dialysis Care Policy reviewed 1/6/25, indicated residents ordered dialysis will have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. Qualified trained staff will communicate via written format with a dialysis communication form. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R59 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic renal disease (ESRD - the kidneys permanently fail to work) and high blood pressure. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/27/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident was free from unnecessary medication for one of twenty-four residents reviewed (Resident 39). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Medication Administration General Guidelines reviewed 1/6/25, indicated medications are administered according to written orders of the attending physician. When PRN (as needed) medications are administered, documentation of complaints or symptoms for which medication was given is to be provided. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included pain in left knee and pain in right hip. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/4/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current. Review of Resident 39's physician order dated December 6, 2024, revealed an order for Tramadol HCI (A medication used to treat severe pain) 50 mg Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for two of four residents (Residents R4 and R168) A review of the facility policy Documentation Policy dated 1/6/25, indicated the facility will provide an account of the resident's care and treatment and information will be appropriate. The resident's medical record shall be complete, accurate, and timely. A review of the clinical record on 3/7/25, indicated that Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety and bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression). A review of the MDS (minimum data set - resident assessment and care screening) dated 12/18/24, indicated the diagnoses remained current and the resident can make needs known. A review of physician orders dated 3/4/25, indicated Resident R4 received psychoactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a through investigation three of three allegations of possible abuse and neglect. (5/20/24, 6/11/24, and 6/26/24) Findings include: A review of facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy date 12/23/23, revealed that abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property will not be tolerated. An investigation of the allegations will be conducted. A review of grievance form dated 5/20/24. revealed Resident R4 alleged that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)Employee E1 refused to provide treatment on 5/18/24. A statement written date 5/18/24, by LPN Employee E1 confirmed that she refused to complete the treatment as she was unaware of the physician order. A review of Resident R4's May Electronic Treatment Administration Record (ETAR) revealed that LPN Employee E1 signed off on completing the treatment on 5/16/24, and 5/17/24. A review of grievance form dated 6/11/24, Resident R5 alleged that a staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, resident medical records, facility provided documents, staff statements and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified living experience for one of three residents (Resident R4). Findings include: A review of facility Resident Rights policy dated 12/13/23, indicated that the residents have the right to a dignified existence, self determination, communication with access to persons and services within and outside the facility. A review of facility grievance form dated 5/20/24, revealed that Resident R4 filed a grievance on 5/18/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E1 called the resident by her non preferred name. Review of a handwritten employee statement submitted on 5/18/24, by LPN Employee E1 confirmed that she had called the resident by her non preferred name. LPN Employee E1's statement indicated that LPN Employee E1 and Resident R4 were discussing a treatment for the resident when LPN Employee E1 stated she said * (resident's non preferred name) I have to go look at the computer. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility documents, clinical record review as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident need for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility, Nursing Services Policy dated 12/8/23, indicated the facility will have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/27/24, included the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate respiration resulting in low levels of oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were monitored, assessed, and received the necessary services to prevent pressure ulcers from developing or worsening for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pressure Ulcer Policy dated 12/13/23, indicated a resident who enters the facility without a pressure ulcer will not develop a pressure ulcer unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates they are unavoidable. All residents will be assessed for pressure ulcer risk on admission, monitored weekly and reviewed quarterly and as needed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/3/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (high blood sugar levels), and anemia (too little iron in the blood). Section M: Skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for Legionella (bacterium that causes Legionnaires Disease found in pipes and heating systems) Control, the facility's infection control tracking logs for water management and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive program for water management to monitor the potential development and spread of Legionella within the facility, failed to exercise proper infection control techniques and dispose of contaminated PPE (personal protective equipment) during a dressing change to prevent the potential of spread of infection for one of three residents (Resident R59). Review of the facility Legionella Policy-Environmental reviewed 12/13/23, indicated that the facility will implement control measures to reduce the potential for the growth and spread of Legionella by quarterly testing of chlorine levels. The facility indicated that the Weekly Water Temperature Inspection logs are used to track the testing of the water temperatures and the chlorine levels.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for one of three residents (Residents R59). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Rights dated 12/13/23, indicated the Resident has a right to a dignified existence. The facility must treat each Resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included malnutrition, falls, heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/27/23, indicated the diagnoses remained current. Review of the facility provided pressure ulcer list indicated Resident R59 developed pressure ulcers of his right and left heels on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record, facility provided documents and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for one of two residents (Resident R21). Review of the facility policy Physician Services, last reviewed on 12/13/23, indicated that all medications and treatments administered to the resident must be ordered by the physician. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinsons (a disorder of the nervous system that affects movement), anxiety, and cognitive disorder. Review of the Physician Orders Audit Report indicated that on 12/2/23, Resident R21 was ordered the Freestyle Libre 2 Sensor for glucose monitoring (device that requires no finger sticks). Resident R21's family member (FM1) requested due to Resident R21's inability to tolerate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards when the salon was unsecured containing hazardous items in two unsecured cabinets (Beauty Salon). Findings include: During an observation on 2/13/24, at 10:50 a.m., the main hallway between the two nursing unit halls, the beauty salon door was unsecured with a hoyer lift placed inside and one upper cabinet with a bottle of eye wash, a bottle of Tylenol with tablets inside, and the lower cabinet had a bottle of sledge hammer all purpose cleaner. During an interview on 2/13/24, at 10:53 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that the salon door should have been locked. The NHA confirmed that the cabinets should have been secured and that the facility failed to maintain the environment free from potential hazards. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility. 28 Pa. Code: 211.10(d) Resident care policies.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a functional resident call bell system for the beauty salon (Beauty Salon). Findings include: Review of the facility provided checklists of Environmental Services monthly review indicated that the nurses call system of all call lights and bulbs are functioning is identified. During an observation on 2/13/24, at 10:50 a.m., of the hair salon, the emergency call bell alarm was triggered however, the light above the door and the alert sound were not in functioning order. During an interview on 2/13/24, at 10:50 a.m., Nurse Aide Employee E2 indicated that the light above the door should illuminate and a sound should be present to alert staff of the need for assistance. During an interview on 2/13/24, at 10:53 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and Maintenance Director Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to provide a functional call bell system for the hair salon to alert staff if assistance is needed. 28 Pa. Code: 205.28 (c) (1) Nurse's station. 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) assessments were completed in the required time frame for four of 22 residents (Resident R14, R25, R27, and R31).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments, dated October 2025, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission (admission date plus 13 calendar days), and annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Resident R14 had an ARD of 8/11/25, with an MDS completion date of 8/26/25 (15 days later). Resident R25 had an ARD of 8/5/25, with an MDS completion due date of 8/20/25 (15 days later). Resident R27 had an admission date of 9/22/25, with an MDS completion due date of 10/8/25 (16 days later).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for four of ten direct care staff members (Employees E2, E5, E6, and E7).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on effective communication. Review of the Activity Employee E5's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/6/06. Review of Activity Employee E5's training record for 1/6/25, through 1/6/26, did not include training on effective communication. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/9/24. Review of NA Employee E6's training record for 1/9/25, through 1/9/26, did not include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for five of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E5, E6, and E7).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Included in the list of topics was Resident Rights and Confidentiality.Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on resident rights.Review of Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/12/19. Review of RN Employee E3's training record for 2/12/25, through 2/12/26, did not include training on resident rights.Review of the Activity Employee E5's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/6/06. Review of Activity Employee E5's training record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) for five of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E4, E5, and E6).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on the QAPI Program. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/12/19. Review of RN Employee E3's training record for 2/12/25, through 2/12/26, did not include training on the QAPI Program. Review of the Activity Employee E4's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/16/10. Review of Activity Employee E4's training record for 2/16/25, through 2/16/26, did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for three of ten staff members (Employees E2, E5, and E6).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on on compliance and ethics. Review of the Activity Employee E5's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/6/06. Review of Activity Employee E5's training record for 1/6/25, through 1/6/26, did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/9/24. Review of NA Employee E6's training record for 1/9/25, through 1/9/26, did not include training on compliance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-20 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for four of ten staff members (Employees E2, E5, E6, and E7).Review of the facility policy, Inservice Education dated 12/2/25, indicated, The inservice education program is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills and personnel. Included in the list of topics was Care of Cognitively Impaired Residents and Dementia Training. Review of Registered Nurse Employee E2's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/14/23. Review of RN Employee E2's training record for 2/14/25, through 2/14/26, did not include training on behavioral health. Review of the Activity Employee E5's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/6/06. Review of Activity Employee E5's training record for 1/6/25, through 1/6/26, did not include training on behavioral health. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 1/9/24. Review of NA Employee E6's training record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHAD M. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2022
DAVID V. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2022
JEFFREY L. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/16/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-29-04 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KENDRA M. UOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KERRI A. ROOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KEVAN R. UNOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KRISTEN S.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KYLE J. UNVOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOSEPH L. UNVERFERTH 12-15-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
LAWRENCE G. UNVERFERTH 12-13-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
KLAY, CELESTEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2016
PRUETT, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/24/2022
ROMES, KERRIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/29/2019
SHAW, ANTHONYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/26/2015
UNVERFERTH, CHADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2003
HCF MANAGEMENT, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$573K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 3%Other / private 33%

This home reported $573K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,587per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$318per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395705. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next