Manor At Perrysburg
250 Manor Drive, Perrysburg, OH 43551 · For profit - Corporation · 111 certified beds · (419) 874-0306 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.4% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.8% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 39.0–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 2.7–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 101.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed as physician ordered. This affected one (#13) of one resident reviewed for wound treatments. The facility census was 106.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/30/23 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot, congestive heart failure, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right calf.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition and had open lesions of the foot, other than ulcers, rashes or cuts.Review of the physician orders dated 12/19/25 revealed Resident #13 had a wound to the right foot with treatment directions to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate with silver, wrap with kerlix then ACE wrap, every day shift for open area. There were treatment directions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of meal tickets, staff and resident interviews, and review of Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure residents received menu items as selected at mealtime. This affected two (#11 and #15) of four residents reviewed for accuracy of meal tray food items. The facility census was 106.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/09/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, type II diabetes mellitus, and overactive bladder. Review of the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition and was able to eat independently.Interview on 12/24/25 at 8:48 A.M. with Resident #11 revealed she generally did not receive the choices she selected on her menus for lunch and dinner.Observation during meal service on 12/24/25 at 12:55 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #203, and concurrent interview, confirmed Resident #11 did not receive the vegetable soup she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that residents were served together during dining in the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents who reside on the memory care unit. Additionally the facility failed to ensure a female resident was free from long facial hair. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for facial hair. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/18/25 at 8:58 A.M. of breakfast trays being delivered to the dining room on the memory care unit revealed the staff began delivering trays to the tables. Staff removed the plates and drinks from the trays and placed them in front of the residents. Staff did not serve the residents by tables. One table with two residents sitting at the table had one resident that was served at 9:00 A.M. while the other resident was served at 9:14 A.M. The staff were observed serving tables at random from the cart. Observation of another two top table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the psychotropic education form was completed prior to starting medications. This affected one (#30) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 06/25/25 with diagnoses of insomnia, bipolar disorder, depression, stroke, and dementia. Review of the 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was rarely/never understood. Review of the physician order initiated 06/25/25, discontinued 08/20/25, and re-initiated 08/20/25, revealed Resident #30 received Divalproex Sodium (an anticonvulsant) oral tablet delayed release 250 milligrams (mg), twice daily for bipolar disorder. Review of the physician order initiated 07/24/25, discontinued 08/20/25, and re-initiated 08/20/25, revealed Resident #30 received Sertraline Hydrochloride (HCl) (an antidepressant) oral tablet 50 mg once daily for depression. An additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan included all resident care areas. This affected two (#77 and #98) of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 96.Findings include:1.Review of medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 09/01/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and visual hallucinations.Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. No pressure ulcers during the look back period.Review of current physician orders revealed right lateral foot cleanse with wound wash, pat dry, cover with foam dressing every third day and as needed if soiled.Review of care plan dated 08/01/25 revealed the resident is at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility. Interventions included apply lotion/moisture barrier cream as needed, encourage frequent repositioning, encourage to lay down after meals to offload,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident fingernails were cleaned and groomed. This affected one (#68) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 96.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 09/20/19 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression. Review of the comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/25, revealed Resident #68 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of the current care plan, updated 07/10/25, revealed Resident #68 required staff participation with personal hygiene. Interview and observation on 08/18/25 at 9:11 A.M. revealed Resident #68 lying in bed. Resident #68 stated his fingernails needed to be trimmed and observation revealed there was debris under his fingernails on both hands. Interview on 08/19/25 at 7:59 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #471 revealed she received in report from night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely ensure a resident's wound was accurately assessed and documented. This affected one (#77) of two residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 09/01/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and visual hallucinations.Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. No pressure ulcers were coded on the assessment.Review of current physician orders revealed on order dated 08/01/25 for right lateral foot, cleanse with wound wash, pat dry, cover with foam dressing every third day and as needed if soiled.Review of the form titled Skin Monitoring: Comprehensive Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) shower reviews dated 08/11/25 and 08/04/25 revealed the diagram of the body had no skin alterations marked on the diagram, and the CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent skin breakdown were implemented as ordered by the physician. This affected one of two residents (#2) reviewed for pressure ulcer care prevention and treatment. The facility census of 96. Findings include:Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, end stage renal disease, asthma, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, urinary tract infection, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, lymphedema, dependence on renal dialysis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #2 had intact cognition, no recorded behaviors, impaired range of motion to bilateral lower extremities, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living, and at risk for pressure ulcer development with a current stage II and stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure post-fall assessments were completed, including neurological assessments. This affected two (#30 and #78) of four residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place for one (#12) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 96.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Former Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25 with diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus, kidney transplant failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident #53 discharged home with family on 08/08/25. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/31/25, revealed Resident #53 had intact cognition, had an impairment on one side of her lower extremity, and required partial/moderate assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, sit-to-standing, and transfers. Further review revealed Resident #53 had one fall without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutrition supplements were provided as ordered. This affected one (#50) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 96.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/27/24 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, unspecified psychosis, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #50 was under the care of hospice. Review of the significant change comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/25, revealed Resident #50 was rarely/never understood and was dependent for all activities of daily life.Review of the physician order dated 01/17/25 revealed Resident #50 received a nutrition supplement (Magic Cup) twice daily with meals.Interview on 08/21/25 at 10:08 A.M. with Dietetic Technician, Registered (DTR) #551 confirmed Resident #50 received Magic Cup twice daily to supplement her calorie intake. Interview on 08/21/25 at 12:05 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #451, and concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper equipment for residents with a tracheostomy were available at bedside. This affected one (#7) of one resident reviewed for a tracheostomy. Resident #7 was the only resident in the facility with a tracheostomy. The facility census was 96.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 03/15/25 with respiratory failure and tracheostomy status.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/05/25, revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition and had a tracheostomy.Review of the care plan initiated 03/15/25 for Resident #7 revealed to keep an extra tracheostomy tube and obturator (a curved rod designed to help the tracheostomy tube fit into the trachea) at bedside.Review of the current physician order initiated 03/18/25 revealed Resident #7 had an order to change tracheostomy tube with size 5.5 and style 41c65 Name of Tracheostomy Shiley every day shift every 90 day(s) for tracheostomy maintenance with Pulmonologist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed. This affected one (#54) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 07/05/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder depressive type, end stage renal disease, and vascular dementia.Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #54 received dialysis.Review of current physician orders revealed the resident had dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.Further review of the electronic medical records revealed no dialysis assessments.Interview on 08/20/25 at 11:26 A.M. with Regional Clinical Nurse (RCN #550) revealed the facility did not do the post dialysis assessments when the residents return from dialysis. RCN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, physician interview, staff interview, and review of Medscape website the facility failed to ensure residents were not given unnecessary medications. This affected one (#10) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 09/08/20 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, epilepsy, major depressive disorder severe with psychotic features, dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, other schizoaffective disorders, and subdural hematoma.Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment.Review of current physician orders revealed Lovenox (blood thinner) injection prefilled syringe kit 40 milligrams (mg)/0.4 milliters (ml) daily for prevention of blood clot request clarification with Neurosurgery follow up on 06/23/25 (started on 06/11/25 and continued until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutrition assessments were completed timely. This affected one (#50) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 96. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/27/24 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, unspecified psychosis, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the significant change comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/25, revealed Resident #50 was rarely/never understood and was dependent for all activities of daily life. Review of the physician order dated 07/15/25 revealed Resident #50 was admitted to hospice. Review of the medical record revealed a quarterly nutrition progress note was completed on 04/29/25. Further review revealed no more recent quarterly or annual nutrition assessment was completed. Additionally, no comprehensive nutrition assessment was completed after Resident #50 had a significant change and was admitted to hospice on 07/15/25.Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were practiced during tracheostomy care. This affected one resident (#7) observed for tracheostomy care. The facility identified only one resident with a tracheostomy in the facility. The facility census was 96. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 03/15/25 with respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, and history of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (a drug resistant bacteria) infection. Review of the current physician orders for August 2025 for Resident #7 revealed she did not have an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (precautions used to prevent infections for residents with areas of enhanced portals of entry such as tracheostomy or wounds). Review of the care plan initiated in March 2025 for Resident #7 revealed she was care planned for EBP due to have a tracheostomy and gastric feeding tube with a goal of understanding that staff will wear personal protective equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility electronic medical record (EMR), review of external provider documents, staff interview, interview with external provider staff, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident timely received medications upon discharge. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of Social Security (SS) of discharge. This affected one (#110) of three residents (#110, #112, and #114) reviewed for discharge rights. Findings include: 1. Review of the EMR for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 07/25/24 and a discharge date of 03/12/25 with diagnoses including frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus (DM2), Vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia, frontal lobe and executive dysfunction, retention of urine, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), constipation, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, hypertension (HTN), and multiple myeloma not having received remission. Review of the most recent State Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered via feeding tube per physician orders. This affected one resident (#15) out of 6 residents reviewed for medications. The census was 95. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #15 include sick sinus syndrome, traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was receiving nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of Resident #15's care plans dated 02/19/25 revealed a focus for alteration in gastro-intestinal status related to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastronomy (PEG) tube for tube feeding and nothing per mouth due to dysphagia. Interventions include administering medications per order. Further review of the care plans dated 03/16/25 revealed a focus for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policies, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all nursing care was provided in accordance with standards and practices. This affected three residents (#15, #16, and #18) of three residents observed for medication administration. The current census was 95. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #15 include sick sinus syndrome, traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was receiving nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of Resident #15's care plans dated 02/19/25 revealed a focus for alteration in gastro-intestinal status related to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastronomy (PEG) tube for tube feeding and nothing per mouth due to dysphagia. Interventions include administering medications per order. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility policies, staff interview, and review of medical records, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate lower than 5%. The error rate on 03/26/24 was 19%, this affected three residents (#15, #17, and #18) of three residents observed for medication administration. The current census is 95. Findings include: Observation on 03/26/25 from 9:15 A.M. to 10:01 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 administering medications to the residents on the B-hall revealed there to be 11 medication errors noted during 3 medication administrations for Resident #15, Resident #17, and Resident #18. LPN #100 was observed administering 57 medications to four residents during the observation. 1. Review of Resident #15's care plans dated 02/19/25 revealed a focus for alteration in gastro-intestinal status related to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastronomy tube, (PEG) for tube feeding and nothing per mouth due to dysphagia. Interventions include administering medications per order.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policies, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to properly administer insulin medications per the manufacturer's guidelines. This affected one resident (#18) out of five residents observed receiving medications. The current census was 95. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #18 include diabetes type two, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity. Review of Resident #18's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was receiving insulin injections. Review of Resident #18's care plans dated 09/21/23 revealed a focus for diabetes mellitus. Interventions include checking blood glucose per physician order and to administer medications per order. Review of Resident #18's physician ordered medications dating from 09/30/23 to 03/25/25 revealed the resident was ordered to receive Amiodarone 200 mg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical record, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for administration. This affected two residents (#26 and #80) of five (#26, #71, #80, #89, and #93) residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The Facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/02/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type II diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HTN), symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndrome, bipolar disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and aphasia following cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/24, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 09/12/24 for Famotidine (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility medical record, review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant mediation errors. This affected three residents (#26, #89, and #93) of five residents (#26, #71, #80, #89, and #93) reviewed for accurate medical records. The Facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/02/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type II diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HTN), symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndrome, bipolar disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and aphasia following cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/24, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the current physician orders for Resident #26 revealed a physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure gloves were worn while administering subcutaneous insulin. This affected one resident (#71) of five (#26, #71, #80, #89, and #93) reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified 24 residents (#3, #4, #7, #8, #9, #10, #17, #26, #28, #29, #32, #39, #42, #50, #61, #65, #67, #69, #70, #71, #73, #79, #89, and #93) who were prescribed insulin. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 02/18/23 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and type two diabetes mellitus, type II. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #71 revealed an order, dated 05/03/22, for 16 units of Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector 100 unit per milliliter (ml) to be administered subcutaneously (injected under the skin) (SQ) one time a day for diabetes mellitus, type II. Observation of medication administration to Resident #71 on 01/14/25 at 7:40 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain controlled substance drug records. This affected four (#118. #24, #117, #84) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 99. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #118 revealed an admission date of 03/30/23 and a discharge date of 06/26/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders dated 06/18/24 revealed the resident was ordered Ceftriaxone sodium injection solution reconstituted one gram, inject one gram intramuscularly one time only for infection for one day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was timely completed. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 99. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 09/30/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the comprehensive care plan dated 10/01/24 and last revised on 10/12/24 revealed there was no care plan in place for incontinence care. Review of the continence task documentation from 09/30/24 through 10/22/24 revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interview on 10/22/24 at 7:23 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #423 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with assistive devices as ordered/care planned. This affected one (Resident #27) out of three residents reviewed for assistance with drinking. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/22/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type two diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, vascular dementia, disorientation, delirium, essential tremor, and hypertension. Review of Resident #27's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/28/23, revealed Resident #27 had a brief interview of mental status score of zero which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #27 required supervision/touching to moderate assistance for activities of daily living. Resident #27 was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the Nursing Interdisciplinary Meeting Note, dated 03/07/24, revealed nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were applied in accordance with physician orders and failed to ensure wound measurements were consistently and accurately maintained in the medical record. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wound management and care. Facility census was 98. Findings include: Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, heart failure, chronic vascular disorder of intestine, hypotension, malignant neoplasm of appendix, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, rhabdomyolysis, anxiety disorder, major depression, chronic embolism and thrombosis, lymphedema, stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacral region, unstageable pressure ulcer to right heel, urinary tract infection, and asthma. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #3 with intact cognition, dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was practiced during meal services. This directly affected five (#30, #93, #94, #100, and #307) residents and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except one resident (#38) the facility stated did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Observations on 11/28/23 beginning at 11:57 A.M. revealed [NAME] #503 wearing gloves and plating food for the noon meal. [NAME] #503 opened a drawer searching for a serving utensil, used a ladle to pour a bowl of soup, opened a plastic bag of hamburger buns, picked up a hamburger bun with his gloved hands, opened it on the plate and used a utensil to scoop mechanical soft bologna onto the sandwich then used the same gloved hand to close the sandwich. [NAME] #503 stated the meal he just plated was for Resident #30. [NAME] #503 continued to touch serving utensils for bologna slices, ground bologna, pureed bologna, wax beans, and soup with his gloved hands, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the manufacturer specifications, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided beds of the appropriate length. This affected one (Resident #101) of three reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, hypertension, muscle weakness and encounter for orthopedic after care. Review of Resident #101's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #101 was cognitively intact. Resident #101 was independent with eating and oral care. Resident #101 required assistance from staff with dressing and mobility. Resident #101 was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. Resident #101 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #101's care plan revised 11/11/23 revealed supports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were consistent within the medical record. This affected two (Residents #74 and #258) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/04/22. Diagnoses include frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, cardiomegaly, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #74's paper medical record revealed a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care - Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest) form dated 11/20/23 revealing the resident's advanced directive was DNRCC - Arrest. Review of current physician order dated 08/19/23, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed Resident #74's advanced directive was Do Not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician when a wound treatment was not completed. This affected one (Resident #257) of two residents reviewed for wounds. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding ongoing complaints of elevated pain. This affected one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #257 revealed an admission date of 11/23/23 with diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis. Review of the Nursing Admission/readmission Screener dated 11/23/23 revealed Resident #257 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. Further review revealed Resident #257 was admitted with a left hip open wound with a wet to dry dressing and expectation a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) (a method of drawing out fluid and infection from a wound to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of bathing documentation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident showers were completed as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #64) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 99. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 had an admission date of 11/23/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care last revised 12/03/22 revealed the resident required staff participation with bathing. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #64 was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays on day shift. Review of shower documentation for the last 30 days revealed no documentation Resident #64 received showers on 11/03/23, 11/14/23, and 11/24/23. Review of the nurse's notes dated 11/01/23 through 11/29/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete an initial wound assessment and failed to complete wound treatments as ordered for one (Resident #257) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #257 revealed an admission date of 11/23/23 with diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis. Review of the Nursing Admission/readmission Screener dated 11/23/23 revealed Resident #257 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. Further review revealed Resident #257 was admitted with a left hip open wound with a wet to dry dressing and expectation a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) (a method of drawing out fluid and infection from a wound to help it heal) would be applied after admission. Review of a physician order dated 11/23/23 revealed Resident #257 should receive NPWT applied the left hip every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 125 millimeters of mercury (mmHg),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately check the placement of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube prior to administering medications. This affected one (Resident #357) of three residents reviewed for PEG tube medication administration. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #357 revealed an admission date of 11/16/23 with diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke) and gastrostomy tube. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #357 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #357's physician orders for November 2023 revealed medications were to be administered via PEG tube, regular mechanical soft diet with nectar thickened liquids, and tropical liquid supplement to be administered via PEG tube if the resident ate less than 75% of a meal. Observation on 11/28/23 at 8:17 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #492 checking for PEG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed ensure pain interventions were in place for a resident. This affected one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteomyelitis, essential hypertension, anemia, essential hypertension, cauda equina syndrome, muscle weakness, insomnia and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #101 was cognitively intact, was alert and oriented and was able to make his needs known. Resident #101 received scheduled and as needed pain medications. Further review revealed the resident did not receive non-medication interventions for pain. Review of the care plan for Resident #101 dated 10/19/23 revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure controlled pain medication administration was accurately documented throughout the resident's medical record. This affected one (#101) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), hypertension, anemia, cauda equina syndrome (compressed nerve roots in the lumbar spine), muscle weakness, insomnia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #101 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #101's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident had orders for oxycodone HCI oral tablet, five milligrams (mg), one tablet every four hours as needed for moderate pain and oxycodone HCI oral tablet, five mg, two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing direct care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one (#357) of four residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #357 revealed an admission date of 11/16/23 with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA - stroke) and gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident #357's current physician orders revealed the resident's medications were to be administered via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG - tube feeding) tube, was on a regular mechanical soft diet with nectar thickened liquids, and received tropical liquid supplement, to be administered via PEG tube if the resident eats less than 75% of a meal. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #357 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were administered per CDC guidelines. This affected three (#11, #62, #64) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 99. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date 03/23/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and chronic kidney disease. Review of the immunization records for Resident #11 revealed the resident last received a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) on 01/05/22. Review of CDC recommendations for pneumococcal vaccine timing for adults, dated 02/16/22, revealed based on the resident's age and date of last pneumococcal immunization the resident should have been offered one dose of the pneumococcal 15-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV 15) or PCV20 one year after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment when residents were provided a meal in the dining room on a meal tray. This affected 13 (#18, #19, #34, #38, #53, #54, #56, #61, #64 #89, #91, #92, and #96) of 13 residents observed in the dementia unit. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Observation on 06/07/21 at 12:30 P.M., revealed Resident #18, #19, #34, #38, #53, #54, #56, #61, #64, #89, #91, #92, and #96, in the dining room received their lunch meal on a tray and the tray was not removed while the resident ate. Interview on 06/07/21 at 12:51 P.M., with State Testing Nursing Assistant (STNA) #213 verified some of the residents in the dining room received their lunch meal on a tray and the tray remained in place while the resident ate. STNA #213 stated there was no specific reason this occurred.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of precautionary label and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were appropriately implemented as care planned and failed to ensure medications and laundry detergent were maintained in a safe manner on the locked dementia unit. This deficient practice affected one (#204) resident reviewed for fall interventions and had the potential to affect ten (#16, #17, #18, #19, #26, #34, #53, #61, #91, and #93) residents the facility identified as independently mobile and cognitively impaired on the locked dementia unit. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #204's medical record revealed an original admission date of 05/12/21 and a most recent admission date of 05/25/21. Diagnoses included: cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type II, muscle weakness, metabolic encephalopathy, hyperlipidemia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of medical record, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity by hanging a sign with resident care needs above the resident's bed. This affected one (#100) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #100's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/19 and a readmission date of 06/02/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; schizoaffective disorder, unspecified; gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) without esophagitis; and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/06/21, revealed Resident #100 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive one person physical assistance with eating. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #100 had a self-care deficit and impaired mobility related to right sided weakness post cardiovascular accident (CVA). Interventions included eating assistance required,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline or comprehensive care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for a resident admitted with a urinary catheter. This affected one (#208) of one residents reviewed with urinary catheters. The facility identified eight residents with urinary catheters. The census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #208's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, hyperlipidemia, chlamydial pneumonia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of an admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #208 was oriented to person only and was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of a baseline care plan initiated on 06/04/21 and completed on 06/06/21, revealed no care plan was developed for Resident #208's urinary catheter care. Observation on 06/07/21 at 1:59 P.M. and 5:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident participation in care conferences. This affected one (#5) of two residents reviewed for care conference participation. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/21. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia; unspecified atrial fibrillation; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) unspecified; and type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/14/21, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Review of a case management progress note dated 02/04/21 revealed a call was placed to Resident #5's daughter to schedule a care conference and was awaiting a return call. The medical record was silent for communication with the Resident regarding her care conference meetings or documentation of a care conference meeting until 04/14/21. Interview on 06/08/21 at 2:26 P.M., with the MDS Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing assistance with positioning in bed as indicated in the nursing plan of care. This deficient practice affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/20, with diagnoses including: anemia, asthma, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia, acute embolism and thrombosis of lower bilateral extremities, polyneuropathy, malignant neoplasm of appendix, history of pressure ulcer to right heel, pressure ulcer to sacral region, hydronephrosis, hypotension, chronic vascular disorder of intestines, major depression, anxiety, and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as alert, able to make needs known, dependent on staff for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing restorative nursing services in accordance with physical therapy recommendations. This deficient practice affected one (#11) of 24 residents reviewed for range of motion and treatment. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/20, with diagnoses including: anemia, asthma, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia, acute embolism and thrombosis of lower bilateral extremities, polyneuropathy, malignant neoplasm of appendix, history of pressure ulcer to right heel, pressure ulcer to sacral region, hydronephrosis, hypotension, chronic vascular disorder of intestines, major depression, anxiety, and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as alert, able to make needs known, dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted with a urinary catheter had a physician order for use and failed to ensure care was provided for the urinary catheter. This affected one (#208) of one residents reviewed with urinary catheters. The facility identified eight residents with urinary catheters. The census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #208's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, hyperlipidemia, chlamydial pneumonia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of a hospital after care summary revealed Resident #208 was treated in the hospital between 05/25/21 and 06/04/21 and revealed Resident #208 had a urinary catheter inserted on 06/02/21 for acute urinary retention and obstruction. Review of an admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #208 was oriented to person only and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAD M. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| DAVID V. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JEFFREY L. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-29-04 REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KENDRA M. U | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KERRI A. RO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KEVAN R. UN | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KRISTEN S. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KYLE J. UNV | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/13/2021 |
| JOSEPH L. UNVERFERTH 12-15-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| LAWRENCE G. UNVERFERTH 12-13-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/13/2021 |
| KLAY, CELESTE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| MILLER, JEFF | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| ROMES, KERRI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/29/2019 |
| SHAW, ANTHONY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/26/2015 |
| UNVERFERTH, CHAD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/17/2003 |
| HCF MANAGEMENT, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2004 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $452K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366022. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.