Roselawn Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 74% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 44.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.482 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility staffing review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure at least eight hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage per day for seven days. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the nursing staff schedule from 05/19/26 to 05/25/26 revealed no documentation to support the facility had eight hours of consecutive RN coverage on 05/23/26 and 05/24/26.Interview on 05/28/26 at 11:00 A.M., the Administrator verified the facility did not have eight hours of consecutive RN coverage on 05/23/26 and 05/24/26.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment included the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff are available to meet the residents' needs. This had the potential to affect all the residents. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], which was reviewed on 03/12/26 revealed no documentation to support the facility determined the number of qualified staff needed to provide care for the residents. During an interview on 05/27/26 at 2:43 P.M., the Administrator confirmed the Facility Assessment did not contain documentation to support the facility determining the number of staff that would be needed to provide care for the residents.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed. This affected one (#48) of four residents reviewed for EBP. The facility failed to ensure glucometers were sanitized following accuchecks. This had the potential to affect seven (#8, #9, #11, #20, #28, #32, and #41) who the facility identified as receiving accuchecks testing on the E and D-halls. The facility also failed to ensure the measures to prevent the growth of Legionella were completed. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 01/02/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, malignant neoplasm of tonsil, tracheostomy status, and gastrostomy status. Review of care plan dated 01/06/26, revealed Resident #48 had an indwelling medical device and may be in EBP while residing at the facility. Interventions included educating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (#33) of four residents observed during med pass. The facility identified 10 residents (#9, #14, #16, #22, #27, #31, #32, #33, #38 and #41) who were independently mobile whether ambulatory or wheelchair on D-hall. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 11/15/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to epilepsy, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #33 had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for medication administration. Review of Active physician orders for Resident #33 revealed the following medications to be given upon rising: bee pollen (dietary supplement) 500 milligrams (mg) daily, docusate (stool softener)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen stored, prepared, distributed and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 36 out of 40 residents who received food from the kitchen. Four Residents (#23, 26,37, and 48) do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 05/26/26 at 7:47 A.M., with [NAME] #265, revealed one six pound eleven ounce can of crushed pineapple, approximately half full, and one seven pound empty chocolate pudding can being stored under the three compartment sink with the lids left open and positioned upright. Both cans contained black residue on the interior and exterior surfaces. The findings were verified at the time of observation with [NAME] #265.Continued observation of the kitchen on 05/26/26 at 8:00 A.M., with [NAME] #265, revealed black, loose residue around the gas burners of the stove, along with crumbled food debris. Multiple dried streaks of an unidentified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided to a resident timely. This affected one (Resident #17) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25 with medical diagnoses of traumatic subdural hemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), hypertension and epilepsy. Resident #17 discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the end of Prospective Payment System (PPS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing, bed mobility, and transfers and supervision with eating and toilet hygiene. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #17's last day of Medicare A coverage was 12/23/25.Review of Resident #17's NOMNC revealed Medicare last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary team (IDT) members attended care conferences as per facility policy. This affected one (Resident #26) out of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/16/18 with medical diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, chronic kidney stage III, gastrostomy tube, essential tremor, and moderate Intellectual Disabilities.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living.Review of Resident #26's care conference documentation revealed care conferences were held on 10/10/25 and 01/02/26 and the staff attendees included nursing and Social Service designee only. Review of the care conference note on 04/04/26 revealed staff attendees included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities to meet residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. In addition, the facility failed to document individual participation in activities as per policy. This affected one (Resident #26) out of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/16/18 with medical diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, chronic kidney stage III, gastrostomy tube, essential tremor, and moderate Intellectual Disabilities.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living.Review of the Resident Preference Evaluation dated 06/25/25 revealed it was important to Resident #26 to listen to music, do things with groups of people, and participate with religious activities.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied per physician order. This affected one (Resident #37) of one resident reviewed for splints. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 10/12/23. Diagnoses included contracture of muscle right hand, contracture of left hand, contracture of right elbow, and contracture of left elbow.Review of the physician orders revealed a left blue palm protector and a right hand small tan hand roll if able (or washcloth) on in the morning at breakfast time and remove at lunch time approximately for four hours and monitor skin.Review of the care plan dated 09/05/24 revealed assist with bilateral hand splints apply after morning care or hand hygiene and remove at end of first shift or as tolerated. Small tan hand roll to right, blue soft hand splint to left. Provide skin checks before applying and after removal. Interventions included assess skin for redness, irritation, open areas and report to nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to address a resident's significant loss. This affected one (Resident #05) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 03/04/25 with medical diagnoses of anemia, anxiety, arthritis, and depressive disorder.Review of Resident #05's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, required substantial/maximum staff assistance for bathing and bed mobility, and partial/moderate assist with transfers. The MDS revealed Resident #05 had a significant weight gain, was edentulous, and received a mechanically altered diet.Review of Resident #05's physician order dated 03/04/25 for bumetanide (a diuretic) 2 milligram one tablet by mouth daily and an order 12/02/25 for a regular mechanical soft…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $320K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH