Court House Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and hospital record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when they failed to monitor Resident #2 who was on Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) and had a decreasing hemoglobin and did not complete a Physician recommended complete blood count (CBC) lab test. This resulted in harm when Resident #2 had bloody tarry stool and was admitted to the hospital for three days with a hemoglobin lab value (a test to detect anemia with a normal range of 11.5 to 15.4 g/dl) of 4.5 grams per dececiliter (g/dl) upon hospital admission. Resident #2 had to receive three units of packed red blood cells and was found to have a gastric ulcer that required clamping. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed on anticoagulant medication. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/04/22 with pertinent diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2019-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's fall interventions were implemented to prevent falls in accordance with the resident's fall risk care plan. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #33's bilateral side rails were not in place and the resident experienced a fall resulting in a laceration to the head and bruising. The resident was subsequently sent to the hospital and required staples. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a second resident's (Resident #32) fall interventions in accordance with the care plan. This affected two (Resident #32 and Resident #33) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/13/17 with diagnoses including unspecified pain, unilateral primary osteoarthritis to the left knee, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on infection control log review and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility and community acquired organism was identified and tracked in the facility's infection control log. This had the potential to affected all 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the January 2024 infection control log, the urinary tract infection (UTI) no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #143 was prescribed the antibiotic Augmentin for a UTI with no identification of the organism causing the UTI. Review of the February 2024 infection control log, the UTI no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #12, #144 and #145 were admitted from the hospital with antibiotic orders with no identifying organism causing the UTI. Review of the March 2024 infection control log, the UTI no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #38, #144 and #146 were admitted from the hospital with antibiotic orders with no identifying organism causing the UTI. Review of the July 2024 infection control log, the UTI no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #52,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (#30) family of a change in condition and new physician orders related to the change in condition. This affected one (Resident #30) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an initial admission date of 01/26/21 with the latest admission date of 03/12/25 with the diagnoses including pneumonia, anemia, adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, cerebrovascular accident with right sided hemiplegia, severe morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypercholesterolemia, obstructive sleep apnea, obstructive and reflux uropathy, gout, dementia, congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis, metabolic encephalopathy, spinal stenosis, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder and insomnia. Review of the plan of care dated 11/18/22, last revised 02/26/24 revealed the resident was at risk for bleeding and bruising due to antiplatelet therapy. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, record reviews, and hospital discharge record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #188 had a dressing order in place and [NAME] hose ordered and failed to ensure Resident #199's weekly wound assessments were documented along with daily treatments completed for a surgical wound. Furthermore, the facility also failed to ensure a hospice certification was present for Resident #5. This affected three residents (#5, #188, and #199) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #188, revealed an admission date of 03/07/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, subsequent encounter. Review of the functional abilities assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #188…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of wound notes and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent facility acquired suspected deep tissue injury (a type of pressure-induced damage to underlying tissues, such as muscle and subcutaneous layers, that appears as a localized area of discolored intact skin (purple or maroon) or a blood filled blister, without a visible open wound) to bilateral heels. This affected one (Resident #188) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #188, revealed an admission date of 03/07/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, subsequent encounter. Review of the functional abilities assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #188…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review,interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medication. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census is 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands, bell's palsy, and candidiasis of skin and nails. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had mild cognitive deficit and was frequently incontinent of bowel and always incontinent of bladder. The resident required supervision or touching assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene and bed mobility, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and transfers, substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene and substantial/maximal assistance for dressing. Review of physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility medication storage policy, the facility failed to ensure outdated medications were removed from stock. This affected one (Resident #53) out of 11 resident's insulin reviewed. Facility census is 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had a slight cognitive deficit and was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of bladder. The resident required independent with eating, set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene and bed mobility, dependent for toileting and transfers, substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene and dependent assistance for dressing. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #53 had an order dated [DATE] to be administered Humalog Kwik insulin pen-injector…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a pressure ulcer dressing change per physicians orders for Resident #79. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 10/13/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: sepsis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, hypertension, mood affective disorder, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, anemia, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, and infection of amputation stump left lower extremity. Review of the 10/18/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The resident required setup or clean up assistance to roll left and right and was independent for sit to lying. The resident was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcer. Review of a Physician Order dated 10/18/24 revealed wound care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff did not follow infection control procedures during a dressing change for Resident #79. Facility staff did not follow infection control techniques when they removed Resident #79's soiled dressing and did not change gloves and then cleaned the wound with the soiled gloves. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 10/13/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: sepsis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, hypertension, mood affective disorder, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, anemia, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, and infection of amputation stump left lower extremity. Review of the 10/18/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the therapeutic spreadsheet and provide food portions as planned by a registered dietitian. This had to the potential to affect all 78 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the breakfast menu spreadsheet dated 12/21/22 revealed the breakfast meal consisted of six ounces of hot cereal. Observation on 12/21/22 at 7:30 A.M. revealed Dietary Server #290 on Unit A kitchenette used a four-ounce scoop for all residents who selected hot cereal. Interview on 12/21/22 at 7:45 A.M. with Dietary Server #290 verified she had served four ounces of hot cereal to all residents who selected hot cereal. Dietary Server #290 verified the portion size was to be six ounces as listed on the meal ticket, which was generated by the menu spreadsheet. Observation on 12/21/22 at 7:35 A.M. revealed Dietary Server #320 on Unit C kitchenette used a four-ounce scoop for all residents who selected hot cereal. Interview on 12/21/22 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to store foods with label and dates and discard expired foods. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/21/22 at 7:25 A.M. of Unit A kitchenette revealed in the reach in refrigerator, there were two containers of unidentifiable foods with no date and no label. Interview on 12/21/22 at 7:25 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] #321 verified the containers should have been labeled and dated. 2. Observation on 12/21/22 at 7:35 A.M. of Unit B kitchenette revealed in the reach in refrigerator, there was a plastic bag labeled bacon dated 12/11/22. Interview on 12/21/22 at 7:35 A.M. with Dietary Aide #290 verified the containers should have been labeled and dated. 3. Observation on 12/21/22 at 7:45 A.M. of Unit C kitchenette revealed in the refrigerator, there were 15 boiled eggs unlabeled and dated 12/01/22 and there was a plastic bag of labeled swiss cheese dated 12/09/22. Interview on 12/21/22 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-30 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH