Shawnee Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 126.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)/Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine was being implemented per physician recommendations and care plan. This affected one (Resident #1 )of three residents reviewed for the use of CPAP machines. The facility census was 129.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 10/14/25. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, bronchiectasis, and chronic respiratory failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition and was receiving non-invasive oxygen therapy.The care plan dated 05/18/22 revealed Resident #1 was at risk for altered respiratory status. Interventions include assist Resident #1 ensuring the BiPAP)/CPAP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food products were not stored in medication carts near biologicals, ensure medication was stored in the original packaging and labeled with resident identification, failed to ensure all prepackaged medication remained in their resident labeled box, and failed to ensure insulin and medications were dated upon opening. This affected three of six medication carts and two of two medication rooms. This had the potential to affect 23 residents who received medications from the D-hall medication cart, 24 residents who received medications from the A-hall cart, one resident receiving ear drops from the F-Hall cart, and five resident receiving insulin from insulin pens from the A-hall cart. The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 02/12/25 at 9:03 A.M of the F-hall medication cart revealed one opened bottle of a generic ear drops, for wax build-up, with no open date in the third drawer. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #533 verified the ear drops had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for the residents. This affected three residents (#31, #104, and #235). The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spastic hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, abnormal posture, contracture on left elbow, and convulsions. Review of the care plan dated 11/29/24 revealed Resident #31 was at risk to make basic needs known on a daily basis with goal to monitor effectiveness of communication strategies and assistive devices. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively impaired. Observation on 02/10/25 at 7:21 P.M. revealed Resident #31 was laying on her left side in bed. Call light was on the right side of the bed wrapped around the handrail and stuck tightly between the mattress and handrail. Resident #31 was not able to see or reach the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for bathing received the necessary services to maintain good hygiene. This affected one (Resident #97) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 01/13/25. Diagnoses included infection of the skin, diabetes mellitus (DM), pressure ulcer of left and right buttocks, and spinal stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #97 was cognitively intact. Resident #97 was impaired bilateral lower extremity and required assistance from staff with bathing and had three pressure ulcers. Review of the plan of care revealed Resident #97 was at risk for decline of ADL related to cellulitis, injury to right knee, morbid obesity, noncompliance, spinal stenosis, gait and or balance problems, incontinence, unaware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's treatment for a skin tear was completed as physician ordered. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin concerns. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/18/22. Diagnoses included carpal tunnel syndrome, type two diabetes mellitus, cognitive heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Review of a skin issue assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was noted with skin tear measuring 2.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 1.5 cm wide to the left forearm. Review of the physician orders dated 01/24/25 revealed an order to cleanse skin tear on left forearm with normal saline (NS), apply triple-antibiotic ointment (TAO), and covered with bordered gauze every day shift. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand and foot splints were applied per physician order. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for splints. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/10/13. Diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, osteoarthritis, intellectual disabilities, contracture of right shoulder and right elbow, and contracture of muscle right hand. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/25 revealed Resident #1 used a left wrist hand finger orthosis (WHFO), right c-splint elbow brace, PRAFO boots (a custom-fitted ankle foot orthosis that helps support the foot and ankle), palm protectors due to muscle weakness, contractures, and pain. Interventions included braces as ordered with no signs and symptoms of skin irritation and pain and no further decline through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention was in place when a resident fell. This affected one (Resident #335) of four residents reviewed of accidents. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of Resident #335's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/24/24. Diagnoses included depression, chronic kidney disease, malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, and seizures. Resident #335 was discharged from the facility on 01/20/25. Review of a five-day [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #335 was severely cognitively impaired and has had repeated falls. Review of a care plan dated 10/24/24 revealed Resident #335 was at risk for falls related to deconditioning, gait/balance problems, incontinence, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and history of repeated falls. Interventions included to encourage the resident to rest after lunch as tolerated was added on 01/14/25 and wheel resident uses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's respiratory equipment was changed as physician ordered. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/18/22. Diagnoses included cognitive heart failure and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders dated 04/07/24 revealed an order for oxygen maintenance, change oxygen (O2) tubing and supply bag weekly. Wipe down the concentrator and clean filter weekly. Change water jug weekly. Observation of Resident #12's oxygen concentrator humidification bottle on 02/11/25 at 8:48 A.M. revealed it was dated 12/29/24. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #605 on 02/11/25 at 8:53 A.M. confirmed the dressing on Resident #12's O2 humidification bottle was dated 12/29/24. Review of the facility's policy titled Respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review review, observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and review of facility's policy's, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during catheter and ostomy care. This affected one (Resident #79) of residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed admission date of 01/08/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, pressure ulcer to left hip, stage three, colostomy status, pressure ulcer to left buttock and dementia. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/08/25 for changing ostomy appliance every three days and as needed (PRN). An oder dated 02/12/25 for indwelling Foley catheter 16 french with catheter care every shift. The Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 was cognitively intact and required extensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide two residents, #25 and #40, of five (#25, #40, #63, #67, and #80) reviewed for showers, with showers twice weekly. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/06/21. Diagnoses include disorders of bladder, repeated falls, dementia, and diabetes mellitus type II. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Residents #25 was cognitively impaired and was dependent for personal hygiene. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation revealed Resident #25 received a shower on 11/29/24, 12/02/24, and 12/13/24 for the past 30 days with one refusal on 12/16/24. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 11/01/17. Diagnoses include dementia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Residents #40 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $610K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH