Village At The Greene
4381 Tonawanda Trail, Dayton, OH 45430 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (937) 426-5033 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,505 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-06)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.6% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 46.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 41.4–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.1–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 46.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) information, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and identify pressure ulcers and failed to implement interventions and treatments to prevent the development and promote healing of pressure ulcers. The facility failed to identify multiple unstageable (blackened in color with necrotic tissue) deep tissue injuries (DTI), failed to contact the physician to implement treatments, resulting in worsening tissue damage and failed to follow infection control protocols during pressure ulcer dressing changes. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries when one resident (#286) was hospitalized with septic shock as she had a large Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed) sacral decubitus ulcer, as well as bilateral heel decubitus ulcers and a urinary tract infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Observation on 11/07/22 from 1:09 P.M. through 1:29 P.M. in the Cypress, [NAME] View, Pine Glen and Juniper unit kitchenettes, revealed steam table wells at wheelchair height directly open to a walk-through corridor. There were no sneeze guards or barriers from the steam table edge of eight inches, to the corridor counter edge, where residents were passing by the steam table. Foods were being served from the steam table. Observation on 11/07/22 at 1:40 P.M. of Cypress, [NAME] View, Pine Glen and Juniper unit kitchenettes, after meal service was completed, revealed no barrier between the kitchenettes and adjacent resident dining area. Three steam table controls were exposed and two carafes of hot coffee were unattended. During interview on 11/07/22 at 1:55 P.M., Maintenance Director #220 stated the steam table controls should be covered with a counter cover made with a lock. Maintenance Director #220 demonstrated the steam table cover counter cover with lock. He verified the kitchenette staff should use the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital record, staff and family interview, observation, review of the skills checklist for catheter care, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was timely sent to the hospital when the resident exhibited signs and symptom of sepsis. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries when Resident #10 had symptoms of lethargy, foul-smelling urine, and had no urinary output for 48 hours. Subsequently, Resident #10's condition progressively worsened, was sent to the hospital, and diagnosed with sepsis/bacteremia with proteus [a gram-negative rod-shaped bacterium that is a main pathogen causing complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) especially catheter-associated UTI] growing in her urine and blood, an indwelling urinary catheter obstruction with bilateral hydronephrosis (an enlargement of the parts of the kidney that collects the urine), and an acute kidney injury. This affected one (#10) out of three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident and family interview, review of video camera footage, review of facility investigation and incident report, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly transferred and provided a mechanical lift (Hoyer) during transfer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #27 who was a high fall risk, dependent for transfers, and required the utilization of a mechanical lift (Hoyer) for all transfers suffered a right distal femur fracture from a fall that occurred during a transfer. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 83. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 02/20/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, neurogenic bladder, cerebrovascular attack (CVA), non-Alzheimer's dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident from developing Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). This resulted in actual harm when it was discovered Resident #08 was left on a wet mattress, resulting in significant MASD needing antibiotic treatment. This affected one (Resident #08) of one reviewed for MASD prevention. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 01/01/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #08 was cognitively impaired. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #08 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, toileting, supervision for eating and total dependence for transfers. Review of the care plan revised 08/04/22 revealed Resident #08 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to MASD. Interventions included use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not inappropriately discharged when the facility issued a resident a 30- day discharge notice without proper cause. This affected one (#52) out of three residents reviewed for discharge notices. The facility census was 47. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/05/24 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, left hemiplegia, cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage IV. Further review, revealed Resident #52 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and then discharged to another facility on 09/24/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/25, which indicated Resident #52 was cognitively intact and was dependent for bed mobility, bathing, toileting and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #52…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to complete discharge summary/recapitulation of stays and failed to obtain physician discharge orders prior to discharge. This affected two (#48 and #52) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 01/01/22 with medical diagnoses of anemia, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, bipolar disease with psychotic features, and congestive heart failure. Review of the medical record revealed a discharge date of 10/16/25. Review of the medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for bathing, toilet hygiene, bed mobility and transfers and required set-up assistance with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed no documentation to support a discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order prior to administering a c-pap machine and oxygen. This affected one (#09) out of three residents reviewed for following physician orders. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of Resident #09's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/25 with diagnoses of stress fracture of the left femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the care plan for Resident #09, dated 12/08/25 revealed resident had altered cardiovascular status r/t Hypertension, iron deficiency anemia with intervention of to give oxygen as ordered by the physician. Further review of the care plan, dated 12/08/25 revealed resident had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide therapy services to ensure a resident maintained highest practicable level of physical and functional mobility. This affected one (#10) out of three residents reviewed for cares and services. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/19/26 with medical diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of cerebellum, malignant neoplasm of right lung, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/01/26, which indicated Resident #10 had modified independence with decision making, required substantial/maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene and was dependent upon staff for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #10 received physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents who required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This affected five (#09, #22, #43, #53, and #73) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/05/18. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, depression, and cervical cancer. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required supervision for eating, toileting, personal hygiene, and bed mobility, and partial/moderate assistance with bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure gloves were changed between contaminated surfaces and food. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (#11, #18, #25, #28, #32, #34, #39, #40, #41, #54, #59, and #73) who were served from this kitchenette on the Pine Club unit. The census was 76. Findings included Observation on 02/24/25 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #122 had on gloves and was using his gloved hands to touch the trays, silverware, and reaching into the cabinets. He trayed up a meal with the gloves on and reached into the package of rolls and used his gloved hands to place the roll on the plate. He removed his gloves and left the kitchenette and returned with two pots of coffee placed gloves on both hands and reached up into the cabinet with his right hand and gets down two coffee cups and fills one with his right hand placed the coffee on the tray. He continued with the gloves to plate up another meal and went to the bag of rolls and used his right hand to place a roll on the plate and covers the plate with the lid. He walks over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure significant change assessments were completed in a timely manner. This affected three (#43, #45, and #51) of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/26/23. Diagnoses included frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, repeated falls, dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression, breast cancer, hypertension, anxiety, and history of multiple wedge compression fractures, clavicle fracture, multiple rib fractures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for bed mobility, partial/moderate assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the medical record revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately. This affected three (#22, #37, and #51) of 22 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23. Diagnoses included alzheimer's disease, dementia with severe agitation, age-related osteoporosis, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required set-up assistance with eating, supervision with bed mobility, and partial/moderate assistance with toileting, transfers, and dressing. The resident weighed 145 pounds. Review of weights revealed on 01/29/25, the resident weighed 132.4 pounds. On 02/07/24, the resident weighed 133.2 pounds. Interview on 02/26/25 at 3:06 P.M., Dietetic Technician (DT) #78 verified the weight entered on the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nephrostomy tube care was completed as ordered. This affected one (#234) resident out of the one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #234 revealed an admission date of 02/10/25 with medical diagnoses of end stage renal disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, anemia, and malignant neoplasm of cervix. Review of the medical record for Resident #234 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/17/25, which indicated Resident #234 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, required substantial/maximum assistance with bathing, and partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #234 had an indwelling catheter. Review of the medical record for Resident #234 revealed a physician order dated 02/18/25 to change gauze dressing every other day to bilateral nephrostomy tubes. Review of the medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained in a timely manner. This affected three (#49, #51, and #64) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 05/26/23. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, thyroid cancer, anxiety, and hypothyroidism. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, however was dependent on staff for all other ADLs. Review of Resident #49's weights revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility skills documentation form, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy care/oral care was completed as ordered. This affected one (#13) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/14/10 with medical diagnoses of persistent vegetive state, respiratory failure, epilepsy, anoxic brain injury, quadriplegia, and tracheostomy. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #13 was in a persistent vegetative state and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #13 had a tracheostomy. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an order dated 01/25/25 for tracheostomy care/oral care three times per day and an order dated 01/15/25 to change inner cannula two times per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were completed and sent to the dialysis center prior to dialysis. This affected one (#47) resident who attended hemodialysis. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 11/08/24 with medical diagnoses of end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #47 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers and dependent upon staff for bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #47 received dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed a physician order dated 11/05/24 to attend dialysis Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with pick up time at 6:00 A.M. and an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medications were administered as ordered resulting in three medication errors out of 29 opportunities or a 10.34 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#33 and #62) residents out of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/23/17 with medical diagnoses of chronic kidney disease Stage III, morbid obesity, left hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, and spina bifida. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #33 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bathing, and transfers and required substantial/maximum assistance with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication errors when staff did not prime an insulin pen prior to administration. This affected one (Resident #33) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/23/17 with medical diagnoses of chronic kidney disease Stage III, morbid obesity, left hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, and spina bifida. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #33 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bathing, and transfers and required substantial/maximum assistance with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a physician order dated 01/21/25 for Novolog solution 100 units per milliliter (ml) to inject 28 units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, review of insulin pen checklist, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure over the counter medication bottle and insulin pen were dated after opened and failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected two (#33 and 51) residents out of the four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/23/17 with medical diagnoses of chronic kidney disease Stage III, morbid obesity, left hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, and spina bifida. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/06/24, which indicated Resident #33 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bathing, and transfers and required substantial/maximum assistance with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during tracheostomy care. This affected one (#13) resident of one resident observed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 76 Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/14/2010 with medical diagnoses of persistent vegetive state, respiratory failure, epilepsy, anoxic brain injury, quadriplegia, and tracheostomy. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/01/25 which indicated Resident #13 was in a persistent vegetative state and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #13 had a tracheostomy. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a physician order dated 01/25/25 for tracheostomy care/oral care three times per day and an order dated 01/15/25 to change inner cannula two times per day. Review of the physician orders revealed no documentation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the abuse policy was implemented. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, renal insufficiency, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #57's functional status required setup and clean-up for eating, moderate assistance for toileting, and supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #57 was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowel. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #116 on 12/31/24 at 10:59 A.M. revealed at the end of her shift on 12/29/24 a message was sent over What's AP (which is a program the facility used to send…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the abuse policy was implemented. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, renal insufficiency, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #57's functional status required setup and clean-up for eating, moderate assistance for toileting, and supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #57 was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowel. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #116 on 12/31/24 at 10:59 A.M. revealed at the end of her shift on 12/29/24 a message was sent over What's AP (which is a program the facility used to send…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the abuse policy was implemented. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, renal insufficiency, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #57's functional status required setup and clean-up for eating, moderate assistance for toileting, and supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #57 was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowel. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #116 on 12/31/24 at 10:59 A.M. revealed at the end of her shift on 12/29/24 a message was sent over What's AP (which is a program the facility used to send…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and family interview the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for residents at least twice a week. This affected two (#27 and #17) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 74. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 02/20/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, neurogenic bladder, cerebrovascular attack (CVA), non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia, or hemiparesis, and respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was severely cognitively impaired, had impaired functional status on one side for both upper and lower extremities, used a wheelchair, required maximal assistance for bathing, and was dependent for bed mobility, and transfers. Review of care plan dated 02/21/24 for Resident #27 revealed the resident required one to two person assistance for bathing in the bed and two-person for showering.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a resident fall. This affected one (#32) resident of the three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/28/2020 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage IV, hypertension, and history of transient ischemic attack. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed the resident was hospitalized on [DATE], returned to the facility on [DATE], and then discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/22/24, which indicated Resident #32 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision to light touching for eating, ambulation up to ten feet, and bed mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Medication Administration checklist, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#18 and #32) residents out of the five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/23/22 with medical diagnoses of paraplegia, spinal stenosis, asthma, depression, and morbid obesity. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, and transfers and was supervision with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed a physician order dated 01/25/23 for Lisinopril (antihypertensive medication) 5 milligram (mg) by mouth daily and to hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected one (#18) resident out of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/23/22 with medical diagnoses of paraplegia, spinal stenosis, asthma, depression, and morbid obesity. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, and transfers and was supervision with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed physician orders dated 10/24/22 for Calcium Carbonate with Vitamin D (supplement) 500-50 mg one tablet by mouth two times per day, 12/25/22 for Aspirin (analgesic) 81…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a resident assistance with feeding. This affected one (#56) of the three residents reviewed for assistance with meals. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 11/16/23 with medical diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, gastroenteritis, and anxiety. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/24, indicated Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for eating, toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of a physician order dated 11/22/23 revealed Resident #56 was to have one-to-one feeding assistance. Review of a physician order dated 12/18/23 revealed Resident #56 was to have a regular diet with pureed texture and regular liquids. Review of a physician order dated 02/09/24 revealed Resident #56 was ordered a divided plate with meals, and an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff and physician interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in the resident's condition. This affected one (Resident #200) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 10/30/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, liver transplant, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and emphysema. Review of Resident #200 respiratory progress notes from 01/22/24 at 9:12 A.M. revealed Resident #200 was on five liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. The respiratory progress note dated 01/22/24 at 9:25 A.M. revealed Resident #200's oxygen saturation was re-checked on room air, and oxygen saturation was 77%. Resident #200 was breathing shallow and tachypneic gave treatment on six liters, oxygen tank stats held for a couple of minutes but started to fall again. Respiratory therapist notified the nurse on duty and placed Resident #200 on five-liter nasal cannula.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facilities investigation, review of witness statements, and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall intervention was in place to prevent a fall. This affected one resident (#18) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, depression, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 06/08/23 for Resident #28, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and Resident #18 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Resident #18 was assessed as not having any falls. Review of a fall review assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an action plan when they identified pressure ulcers and falls as an area of quality concern, resulting in a substandard quality of care deficiency. Failure to implement an action plan directly affected six (Residents #11, #29, #38, #46, #61, and #81) out of seven falls reviewed who had falls with injuries when the facility had not identified patterns, trends, root cause analysis or implement appropriate interventions. (See findings under F689). Four (Residents #08, #05, #02, and #20) out of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers were identified when the facility didn't ensure proper care, treatment, assessments and care plan interventions were in place. (See findings under F686). The facility failed to identify catheters as a concern and implement an action plan when one (Resident (#10) out of three residents reviewed for indwelling catheters went with no urinary output and the facility physician was not notified to prevent hospitalization. (See findings under F690). This had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the medical director reports, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance (QA) program to ensure accidents, pressure ulcers, and catheters were comprehensively reviewed and timely initiate corrective actions to prevent the incidents. This affected 11 (Residents #11, #29, #38, #46, #61, #81, #08, #05, #02, #20 and #10) out of 30 reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. The facility census was 89. Findings included: Review of the adverse events of the facility revealed six residents (#11, #29, #38, #46, #61 and #81) out of seven falls reviewed who had falls with injuries when the facility had not identified patterns, trends, root cause analysis or implement appropriate interventions which resulted in substandard quality of care under (F689). Four residents (#08, #05, #02, and #20) out of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers were identified when the facility had not ensured proper care, treatment, assessments and care planned interventions were in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify family/residents of hospital transfer/discharge in writing and send a copy to the Ombudsman. This affected seven (Residents #39, #05, #63, #65, #10, #286 and #58) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed admission date of 04/26/22, with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the progress notes dated 07/13/22 revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the hospitalized . Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation to suggest the transfer/discharge paperwork was given to the resident or the Ombudsman was notified of the discharge. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #286 revealed admission date of 10/25/19, with diagnoses including: peripheral vascular disease, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities right and left,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide family/residents of bed hold notice upon discharge to the hospital. This affected seven (Residents #39, #5, #63, #65, #10, #286 and #58) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed admission date of 04/26/22, with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the progress notes dated 07/13/22 revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the hospitalized . Further review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence of a bed hold notification or policy was provided. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #286 revealed admission date of 10/25/19, with diagnoses including: peripheral vascular disease, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities right and left, depression and dementia. Review of the progress notes revealed Resident #249 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for bathing for residents who required assistance. This affected four (Residents #08, #26, #56, and #64) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 05/03/22. Diagnoses included: chronic kidney disease stage 3 unspecified, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, other reduced mobility, hypertension, congestive heart failure, sick sinus syndrome, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, gout, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, chronic atrial fibrillation, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/09/22, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide personal care and ensure accident prevention. This affected four (Residents #8, #64, #56 and #5), of six residents reviewed for personal hygiene care and two (Residents #29 and #11) of 11 residents reviewed for accident prevention. The total facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 04/01/22, revealed all staffing assignments are reviewed as needed to ensure continued coordination and continuity of care for the residents with a minimum of 2.5 hours of direct care hours per resident per day. The facility identified a total of 20 secured unit beds. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/04/22 revealed six residents who attended the meeting reported inconsistent call light response times. Review of staffing schedule on 01/28/22, with a census of 76 during 7:00 A.M to 3:00 P.M. shift, there was one STNA on the secured unit of 16 residents and a nurse split…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the kitchenette refrigerators to prevent contamination and food borne illness . This had the potential to affect all 85 residents who received food from the kitchenettes. The total facility census was 89. Findings include: Observation on 11/09/22 from 8:16 A.M through 8:32 A.M. with Diet Server #269, revealed the following sanitation violations in the resident refrigerator in the kitchenettes: In the Pine Glen resident refrigerator, there was opened thickened apple juice with no open or use by date. In the Juniper unit refrigerator, there were three thickened juice containers with no open or use by dates. In the Cypress unit refrigerator, there was a plate of breakfast foods, uncovered, undated and unlabeled. There were six cups of unidentifiable liquid with no date or label. In the [NAME] View unit refrigerator, there was no thermometer inside the refrigerator. There were 14 cups of unidentified dessert not dated or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct care conferences as required and invite residents or resident representatives. This affected three (Residents #10, #63, and #26) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 05/03/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 3 unspecified, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, other reduced mobility, hypertension, congestive heart failure, sick sinus syndrome, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, gout, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, chronic atrial fibrillation, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/09/22, revealed this resident had intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, Power of Attorney (POA) interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure notification was made to the POA for removal of a urinary catheter and when a tube feeding was restarted continuously. This affected one (Resident #63) of one reviewed for notification of change. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/22, with medical diagnoses included: coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes and respiratory failure. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #63's functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, total dependence for transfers, eating, and toilet use. Resident #63 was coded for urinary catheter, suctioning, tracheostomy care and oxygen. Review of progress notes dated 09/19/22 revealed Resident #63 came into the facility with a urinary catheter. Resident #63 went out to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document a resident's hearing status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (Resident #08) of 30 MDS assessments reviewed. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #08 revealed admission date of 01/01/19, with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, acute diastolic congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic venous hypertension with inflammation of the bilateral lower extremities' atherosclerosis of autologous vein bypass graft of the left extremity with gangrene, left at knee level imputation of the left leg. Record review of ear care exam by Service Provider #10 dated 03/24/22, revealed the reason for visit was Resident #08 had an apparent hearing loss with normal conversation tones and was interested in a visit. Auditory referral was made. A follow-up audiology appointment by Service Provider #10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission was accurate. This affected one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/22, discharged on 08/17/22, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, congestive heart failure, iron deficiency anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hemorrhagic disorder due to extrinsic circulating anticoagulants, hypertensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a baseline care plan for a resident who utilized a tracheostomy and ventilator. This affected one (Resident #05) of 30 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The census was 89. Findings included: Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/13/22, with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, and malnutrition. Review of admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use with two-person assistance. She was total dependence for eating with one-person physical help. She has an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent for bowel. She had one, stage two pressure ulcer. She was on oxygen, required suctioning, tracheostomy, and a mechanical ventilator. Review of baseline care plan dated 07/13/22, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed. This affected three (Residents #05, #56 and #10) of 30 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #05 medical record review revealed an admission date of 07/13/22. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, and malnutrition. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use with two-person assistance. She was total dependence for eating with one-person physical help. She has an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent for bowel. She had one stage two pressure ulcer. She was on oxygen, required suctioning, tracheostomy, and a mechanical ventilator. The MDS revealed it was somewhat important for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper discharge planning was completed. This affected one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 08/05/22, with diagnoses including: pneumonia, heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. Review of physician progress note dated 10/25/22, revealed the resident was admitted to hospice this week per family's preference with comfort medications in place. The plan was to transition to long term care with hospice. Review of the progress notes on 10/31/22 revealed there was not any discharge plan for the resident. Review of the daily census revealed the resident was discharged on 10/31/22. Interview on 11/02/22 at 12:44 P.M., with the Administrator, revealed the family came in and took him home and there was not any discharge paperwork given to him because the facility didn't know he was going to be discharge. The Administrator stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was prepared and provided to a resident or resident representative. This affected one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 08/05/22, with diagnoses including: pneumonia, heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. Review of physician progress note dated 10/25/22, revealed the resident was admitted to hospice this week per family's preference with comfort medications in place. The plan was to transition to long term care with hospice. Review of the progress notes on 10/31/22 revealed there was not a discharge summary. Review of the daily census revealed the resident was discharged on 10/31/22. Interview on 11/02/22 at 12:44 P.M., with the Administrator revealed the family came in and took him home and there was not any discharge paperwork given to him because the facility didn't know he was going to discharge. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for residents. This affected two (Residents #29 and #39) of four residents reviewed for activities. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, and malnutrition. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/18/22, revealed Resident #05 was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent for bed mobility and transfers. She had a tracheostomy and was on a mechanical ventilator. It was somewhat important for the resident to listen to music she liked and favorite activities. Review of activity assessment dated [DATE], revealed the assessment was not completed. The resident had no care plan for activities. Review of the activity participation documentation from 09/20/22 through 10/16/22; 10/31/22 through 11/05/22; and 11/07/22 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper foot care. This affected one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for foot care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 3 unspecified, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, other reduced mobility, hypertension, congestive heart failure, sick sinus syndrome, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, gout, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, chronic atrial fibrillation, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the plan of care, initiated 05/04/22, revealed Resident #26 had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to weakness, arthritis, and chronic kidney disease. Interventions included praise efforts at self-care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding were given per physician orders. This affected two (#5 and #63) out of three reviewed for tube feeding. The facility identified there were seven tube feeding residents. The census was 89. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/13/22. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, and malnutrition. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use with two-person assistance. She was total dependence for eating with one-person physical help. She has an indwelling Foley catheter and was frequently incontinent for bowel. She had one stage two pressure ulcer. She was on oxygen, required suctioning, tracheostomy, and a mechanical ventilator. Observation of the tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff properly performed Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care for one (Resident #286) out of one resident reviewed with a PICC line and urinary catheter care for one (Resident #39) out of three reviewed for urinary catheter use to prevent potential infection of the resident. The facility identified one resident with a PICC line and six residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 08/17/22, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the consent forms, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective immunization program for pneumococcal (pneumonia) and influenza (flu). This affected three (Residents #32, #34, and #48) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left carotid arteries, aphasia following cerebral infarction, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, bilateral, hypertension, alcohol dependence with withdrawal, and cerebral edema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for resident assessments. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/09/19. Diagnoses listed included dementia, Down syndrome, anxiety disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of the MDS assessments revealed a MDS assessment was last completed on 08/30/19. During an interview on 01/02/20 at 10:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (#99) confirmed that a MDS assessment had not been completed since 08/30/19 and that a quarterly MDS assessment was pass due.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for resident assessments. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 06/17/19. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, sepsis, hypothryoidism, and type II diabetes mellitus. Resident #1 was discharged on 08/22/19. Review of MDS assessments revealed a discharge MDS assessment was not completed for Resident #1's discharge on [DATE]. During an interview on 01/02/20 at 10:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (#99) confirmed that a MDS assessment had not been completed when Resident #1 was discharged form the facility on 08/22/19.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review; the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the use of antianxiety and antibiotic medication. Additionally, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the use of a urinary catheter. This affected two Resident's (#8 and #59) of 23 residents reviewed for the development and implementation of comprehensive care plans. The census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses includes Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, agitation, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes mellitus type two, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, hypertension, constipation osteoarthritis. Review of a physician order dated 10/06/19, revealed Resident #8 was ordered clonazepam (antianxiety medication) one milligram (mg) by mouth three times a day. Review of a physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan. This affected one (Resident #50) of two residents reviewed for fall. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/07/17. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and bone density disorder. Review of Resident #50's fall care plan dated as last revised 10/22/19 revealed staff were to encourage Resident #50 to use a walker when ambulating. Review of section G of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 did not walk in room or corridor and did not use a walker. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #50 on 01/09/20 at 7:35 A.M. revealed Resident #50 was not able to use a walker, but used a wheelchair. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/09/20 at 8:32 A.M. confirmed Resident #50's care plan was not updated for not using walker.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received hygiene assistance on a regular basis. This affected one (Resident #43) of two reviewed during the annual survey. The census was 97. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 10/04/19. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes and renal insufficiency. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Functional status was limited assistance for bed mobility, transfers and eating were supervision, and she was extensive assistance for toilet use. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required physical help in part for bathing activity with one-person physical assistance. Review of progress notes dated 11/10/19 through 01/08/20 revealed there wasn't any documentation the resident refused her showers. Review of care plans revealed no concerns of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's splint device was in place per therapy recommendations. This affected one (Resident #82) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 08/22/09. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, contracture left hand, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) of non-infectious origin without acute organ dysfunction, atherosclerotic heart disease, phlebitis and thrombophlebitis of unspecified deep vessels of lower extremity, sick sinus syndrome, mild cognitive impairment, dysphagia, edema, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormal posture, paraphilia, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, hypothyroidism, generalized muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, transient cerebral ischemic attack,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observation, resident representative interview, and staff interview; the facility failed to have fall interventions in place as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 97. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, anemia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, heart failure, hypothyroidism, zoster complications, glaucoma, scoliosis, and syncope. Review of a progress noted dated 01/13/19, revealed Resident #27 was found on the floor by staff. The resident was observed lying on the floor on the resident's left side, wrapped up in bed covers. Documentation revealed the left side of the air mattress was hanging off the bed and it appeared the resident rolled off the bed. New interventions included fall mat and low bed at all times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure physician catheter orders were entered, a baseline care plan was initiated for an indwelling catheter, and catheter care was provided. This affected one (Resident #192) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheter. The facility identified six residents who had indwelling catheters. The census was 97. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #192 revealed an admission date of 12/30/19. Medical diagnoses included cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. His functional status was limited assistance for bed mobility and transfers. He was a supervision for eating and extensive assistance for toilet use. The MDS further identified he had an indwelling catheter. Review of physician orders from 12/30/19 through 01/06/20 revealed no orders for an indwelling catheter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly sanitize the blood glucose monitoring system between resident use. This affected one (Resident #73) of two residents observed during medication administration. The facility identified three residents who use the glucometer from the medication cart on the Willow/Juniper halls. The census was 97. Findings included: Observation on 01/07/20 at 11:32 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #41 was walking down the hallway on [NAME] from Resident #6's room with a glucometer machine. The glucometer machine had a used strip sticking out of it. LPN #41 also had a Novolog Pen in her hand. She dropped the Novolog pen on the floor and left it there. She proceeded to remove the used strip and placed in the sharps container. She then placed a new strip into the machine. Resident #73 was seated next the medicine cart and LPN #41 began to assess the residents blood sugar. The surveyor stopped the LPN #41 and questioned her about the cleaning of the machine. The LPN stated she had cleaned the machine before she went to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,505 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,505 — penalty dated 2025-01-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAD M. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/31/2021 |
| DAVID V. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JEFFREY L. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-29-04 REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KENDRA M. U | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KERRI A. RO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KEVAN R. UN | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KRISTEN S. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KYLE J. UNV | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 12/31/2021 |
| JOSEPH L. UNVERFERTH 12-15-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/30/2021 |
| LAWRENCE G. UNVERFERTH 12-13-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/31/2021 |
| R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/31/2021 |
| KLAY, CELESTE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| PEGG, PEPPER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/21/2022 |
| ROMES, KERRI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/29/2019 |
| SHAW, ANTHONY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| UNVERFERTH, CHAD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/17/2003 |
| HCF MANAGEMENT, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2004 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $357K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365497. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.