Fairview Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 114.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident requiring blood sugar monitoring to meet a resident's needs for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1) resulting in hospitalization and actual harm of Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (a serious complication of diabetes characterized by extremely high blood sugar levels and severe dehydration, often leading to confusion and other mental status changes requiring immediate medical attention to prevent life-threatening outcomes). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Care Plan Policy dated 12/2/25, indicated The Manor will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . Clinical record review revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and hospital records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician-ordered blood glucose monitoring for one of seven residents (Resident R1) reviewed, which required hospitalization and actual harm resulting in Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (a serious complication of diabetes characterized by extremely high blood sugar levels and severe dehydration, often leading to confusion and other mental status changes requiring immediate medical attention to prevent life-threatening outcomes). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Nursing Policy and Procedure dated 12/02/25, indicated a combination of resource material is used to reflect nursing policy as it pertains to resident care. It also indicated that nurses follow these guidelines in addition to specific physician orders when rendering care. Clinical record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-22 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician medication orders were entered in the clinical record upon admission for the resident's immediate care needs for one of one residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Services dated 12/1/25, indicated All orders must be recorded in the resident's clinical record. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/22/26, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), end stage renal disease (a diseases where the kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs), and congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues). Review of Resident R1's physician's orders faxed from the discharging facility to the receiving facility revealed a fax date and time stamp of 4/22/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital, for five of six residents reviewed (Residents R7, R9, R10, R48, and R54).Findings include: Resident R7's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/2/23, with diagnoses that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin). Resident R7's clinical record revealed progress notes revealed notes dated 8/21/25, and 10/26/25, indicating transfers to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence that his/her necessary clinical information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. Resident R9's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/23/25, with diagnoses that included Anemia (a reduction in red blood cells resulting in symptoms such as fatigue and weakness), Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - happens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R12, R9, and R10).Findings include: Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/31/25, with diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, left bronchus or lung (lung cancer), and major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder that causes feelings of sadness, loss of interest in daily activities, emotional and physical problems that impact daily life). Resident R12's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary was provided to Resident R12 and/or his/her representative. During an interview on 4/9/26, at 2:09 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing confirmed that the clinical record for Resident R12 lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plans, and order summaries were provided to the resident and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R14, and R60).Findings include: A facility policy dated 12/2/25, entitled Care Plan Policy revealed Residents will have the opportunity to discuss their goals for care including their preferences for advance care planning and Prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes the attending physician, a registered nurse and a STNA [state tested nurse aide] with the responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition staff, and other appropriate staff and disciplines as determined by the resident's needs, and, to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident, the resident's family or the resident's representative. A facility policy dated 12/2/25, entitled Resident Rights Policy revealed The right to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident requiring intravenous (IV) therapy that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's needs for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R4).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Care Plan Policy dated 12/2/25, indicated The Manor will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Review of Resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/1/26, with diagnoses that included Cerebral infraction (also known as a stroke it occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked), malignant carcinoid tumor of the small intestine (cancer in the digestive tract), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R4's physician's orders revealed an order to change dressing system and measure PICC (peripheral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect an elopement (an at-risk individual leaving a supervised care setting without staff knowledge) for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R53).Findings include:Review of facility policy entitled Care Plan Policy dated 12/2/25, revealed Periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment.Resident R53's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/16/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), dementia (brain changes that cause a decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life due to memory loss, thinking/language difficulties, and personality changes), and hypertension (high blood pressure) .Review of facility documents revealed Resident R53 had an elopement on 5/13/25. Review of Resident R53's care plan for elopement created on 1/17/25, revealed Resident R53 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement (an at-risk individual leaving a supervised care setting without staff knowledge) and failed to adequately implement search procedures related to an elopement for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R53). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Accidents and Incidents Policy, dated 12/2/25, states, The Manor will ensure that the resident's environment remains free of accident hazards and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to reduce accidents. Review of facility policy entitled Missing Resident Policy dated 12/2/25, states It shall be the policy of our organization that all necessary steps are taken to locate any resident that is missing from a Community.Building and Grounds Search: Upon discovery that a resident is missing an announcement of code brown or other approved statement will be made. A building and grounds search…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection regarding respiratory care equipment for one of one residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident R60). Findings include: A facility policy dated 12/2/25, entitled Oxygen Concentrators - Care and Maintenance of Oxygen Concentrators revealed If there are external cabinet filters present, these are to be cleaned weekly by washing the filters with warm water. Allow the filter to dry thoroughly before replacing. Some concentrators have these filers on the sides or on the back of the unit. Resident R60's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/29/24, with diagnoses that included Hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) and Hemiplegia (complete paralysis or loss of ability to move one side of the body) related to Cerebral Infarction (occurs when the blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted preventing oxygen and nutrients from reaching brain cells causing them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated when opened in one of five medication rooms reviewed and one of five medication carts reviewed (Main Medication Room and D-Wing Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications dated 12/2/25, indicated that, .The date opened is recorded by the first person to use each multidose vial.multi-dose vials expire 28 days after initial use, unless otherwise indicated by the manufacturer. Manufacturer's recommendations for Tubersol PPD (solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and for employment), indicated that vials which are entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Manufacturer's guidelines for Lantus insulin (a long-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes), indicated that after opened, vials and pre-filled pens should be discarded after 28 days. Observation on 4/7/26, at 1:10 p.m. of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R4 and R53).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Documentation Policy dated 12/2/25, revealed The Manor will provide a complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc., as well as the progress of the resident's care, (i.e., nursing progress notes, episodic charting, and plan of care.) Appropriate information to assist the physician in ordering medications, treatments, and diet. The purpose of the clinical record is to provide ongoing, individualized information regarding the status of the resident. Review of facility policy entitled Accidents and Incidents Policy dated 12/2/25, states, Documentation in the clinical record will reflect the same information and/or incident report.Follow up documentation will be made in the clinical record each shift for seventy-two hours including, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $531K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA